By Cornelia Wawretchek. The Drug Manufacturer s Guide to Site Master Files

Similar documents
21 CFR PART 11 FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQS)

1. Document Control 2. Change Record Version Date Author(s) Comments 3. Reviewers Version Name Organisation 4. Distribution Version Date Name Status

ICH Topic M 4 Common Technical Document for the Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use Organisation CTD. Step 5

Q&A QP Declaration. Table of contents

1. STRATEGIC PLANNING

Submission of information in the public consultation on potential candidates for substitution under the Biocidal Products Regulation

Summary of PIC/S Guidance Good Practices for Data Management and Integrity in Regulated GMP/GDP Environments

AUDITOR / LEAD AUDITOR PHARMACEUTICAL AND MEDICAL DEVICE INDUSTRY

ABB Limited. Table of Content. Executive Summary

Supersedes Division Name Revision No. 00 Export Division Page No. 1 of 5

Vaccine data collection tool Oct Functions, Indicators & Sub-Indicators

Cybersecurity. Quality. security LED-Modul. basis. Comments by the electrical industry on the EU Cybersecurity Act. manufacturer s declaration

Industry Guidelines for Computerized Systems Validation (GAMP, PDA Technical Reports)

Responsible Person: European Commission, Pharm. Unit Responsible Person: European Medicines Agency, Inspections Sector

DATA INTEGRITY (EMA AUGUST 2016)

21 CFR Part 11 LIMS Requirements Electronic signatures and records

Alexion Pharma International Trading

Introduction. Content. Training Course NAA Inspectors Training Course - Initial Airworthiness. Location(s) / Date(s) List price September 2019

ISO/IEC INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Conformity assessment Supplier's declaration of conformity Part 1: General requirements

Sparta Systems TrackWise Digital Solution

The Accreditation and Verification Regulation - Verification report

INAB Mandatory and Guidance Documents Policy and Index

FSC STANDARD. Standard for Multi-site Certification of Chain of Custody Operations. FSC-STD (Version 1-0) EN

INAB Mandatory and Guidance Documents Policy and Index

Government of Ontario IT Standard (GO ITS)

QP Current Practices, Challenges and Mysteries. Caitriona Lenagh 16 March 2012

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION (EU)

Isabella Marta, Head of Marketing Authorization Department Italian Medicines Agency

Sparta Systems Stratas Solution

TURKISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION

An unofficial translation, in case of any discrepancies between the English version and the original Swedish version the latter will prevail.

EUROPEAN MEDICINES AGENCY (EMA) CONSULTATION

APPROVAL SHEET PROCEDURE INFORMATION SECURITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CERTIFICATION. PT. TÜV NORD Indonesia PS - TNI 001 Rev.05

Rules covering tests / examinations procedures and conditions

Government of Ontario IT Standard (GO ITS) GO-ITS Number 56.3 Information Modeling Standard

Date yyyy-mm-dd binding declaration GASTEC QA GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

Contributed by Djingov, Gouginski, Kyutchukov & Velichkov

How flowmeters perform self-verification

Pre-notification check for type IB Variations 1

COMMITTEE FOR PROPRIETARY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS (CPMP) GUIDELINE ON REQUIREMENTS FOR PLASMA MASTER FILE (PMF) CERTIFICATION

Guidelines 4/2018 on the accreditation of certification bodies under Article 43 of the General Data Protection Regulation (2016/679)

FDA Finalizes Regulation Amending Food Facility Registration Regulations

EU Annex 11 Compliance Regulatory Conformity of eve

OMCL Network of the Council of Europe QUALITY ASSURANCE DOCUMENT

Biocides Submission Manual

EMA Common Repository: Questions and answers relating to practical and technical aspects of the implementation

UDI progress in China

ARTICLE 29 DATA PROTECTION WORKING PARTY

PS Mailing Services Ltd Data Protection Policy May 2018

Integration of Agilent OpenLAB CDS EZChrom Edition with OpenLAB ECM Compliance with 21 CFR Part 11

MARPA DOCUMENT MARPA Revision 1.1

Assessment of Vaisala Veriteq viewlinc Continuous Monitoring System Compliance to 21 CFR Part 11 Requirements

European Aviation Safety Agency

Request for Qualifications for Audit Services March 25, 2015

Guide to the implementation and auditing of ISMS controls based on ISO/IEC 27001

Sparta Systems TrackWise Solution

Good Laboratory Practice GUIDELINES FOR THE ARCHIVING OF ELECTRONIC RAW DATA IN A GLP ENVIRONMENT. Release Date:

Subject: Open letter on REMIT transaction reporting data quality

White Paper Assessment of Veriteq viewlinc Environmental Monitoring System Compliance to 21 CFR Part 11Requirements

OIML-CS PD-05 Edition 2

Guidelines 1/2018 on certification and identifying certification criteria in accordance with Articles 42 and 43 of the Regulation 2016/679

IEEE P1564 Voltage Sag Indices Task Force Meeting

EU Code of Conduct on Data Centre Energy Efficiency

OIE Sub-Regional Training Seminar on Veterinary Legislation Botswana National Veterinary Laboratory, Sebele, Gaborone (Botswana)

Rules for Operators. Version 6 / Version 6, 13 May 2011 Page 1/12

October p. 01. GCP Update Data Integrity

GDPR AMC SAAS AND HOSTED MODULES. UK version. AMC Consult A/S June 26, 2018 Version 1.10

ENCePP Code of Conduct Implementation Guidance for Sharing of ENCePP Study Data

Regulating Cyber: the UK s plans for the NIS Directive

GC0102 Mod Title: EU Connection Codes GB Implementation Mod 3

GUIDELINE. of the European Committee for Welding of Railway Vehicles (ECWRV) ( ) PART 1

AUDIT PROGRAM. Revision 6 Dated September 29, Management Systems Analysis, Inc. P.O. Box 136, Royersford, PA

Summary of Changes in ISO 9001:2008

This Policy has been prepared with due regard to the General Data Protection Regulation (EU Regulation 2016/679) ( GDPR ).

Australian Standard. Records Management. Part 2: Guidelines AS ISO ISO TR

BEST PRACTICE GUIDE for The classification of unforeseen variations

ISO27001:2013 The New Standard Revised Edition

Swedish experiences of reporting according to UNFCCC and KP Malin Kanth Swedish EPA

Data Processing Agreement

QUALITY OVERALL SUMMARY - CHEMICAL ENTITIES (Applications for Drug Identification Number Submissions) (QOS-CE (DINA))

Voluntary certification at an intermediate stage of manufacture

Rev 2 May Health and Safety Authority. Function and Scope of REACH and CLP Helpdesk

Requirements for Certification Bodies

ISO/IEC INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine Information Security Standard

Integration of Agilent UV-Visible ChemStation with OpenLAB ECM

MHRA GMP Data Integrity Definitions and Guidance for Industry March Introduction:

IMI Level 3 Award in Automotive Refrigerant Handling (EC ) I.D NO: 500/6771/0

USDA ISO Guide 65 Program Accreditation for Certification Bodies

ITU Asia-Pacific Centres of Excellence Training on Conformity and Interoperability. Session 2: Conformity Assessment Principles

This Advisory Circular relates specifically to Civil Aviation Rules Part 147. Published by Civil Aviation Authority PO Box 3555 Wellington 6140

Procedure for the Selection, Training, Qualification and Authorisation of Marine Management Systems Auditors

Department of Veterans Affairs VA DIRECTIVE April 17, 2006 WEB PAGE PRIVACY POLICY

General Data Protection Regulation BT s amendments to the proposed Regulation on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of

ISO/IEC/ IEEE INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Systems and software engineering Requirements for acquirers and suppliers of user documentation

Audit Report. Chartered Management Institute (CMI)

Description of the TÜV NORD CERT certification procedure GMP+ FC (Feed Certification scheme) of GMP+ International B.V. (NL)

Quality Management System (QMS)

Inhalt. Description of Certification Procedure ISO 22000, HACCP and DIN 15593

Cooperation with other Certification Systems

Transcription:

By Cornelia Wawretchek The Drug Manufacturer s Guide to Site Master Files

ISBN: 978-3-943267-69-3 A Process Approach to Pharmaceutical Quality Systems A Guide to ICH Q10 Compliance Where a product trademark, registration mark, or other protected mark is made in the text, ownership of the mark remains with the lawful owner of the mark. No claim, intentional or otherwise, is made by reference to any such marks in this book. While every effort has been made by Maas & Peither AG GMP Publishing, to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this book, this organisation accepts no responsibilty for errors or omissions. Copyright 2013 by Maas & Peither AG GMP Publishing, All Rights Reserved This book is based on a chapter of the GMP MANUAL, Good Manufacturing Practice and Implementation. The material has been adapted and edited incollaboration with the FDAnews, 300 N. Washington St., Suite 200, FallsChurch, VA 22046-3431. Maas & Peither AG GMP Publishing Karlstrasse 2 79650 Schopfheim Germany http://www.gmp-publishing.com Neither this e-book nor any part may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, microfilming, and recording or by any information storage and retrieval system without permission in writing from the publisher.

The Drug Manufacturer s Guide to Site Master Files Table of Contents Introduction History...3 Focus of Recent Update (PE 008-4)...4 Regulatory Requirements...5 Appendices...16 A. Explanatory Notes on the Preparation of a Site Master File B. Explanatory Notes for Pharmaceutical Manufacturers on the Preparation of a Site Master File C. Sample Document: SMF Appendix 8 Equipment and Devices for Production and Quality Control D. Sample Site Master File About the Author Cornelia Wawretschek is a pharmaceutical technical assistant with GxP Services in Germany and a freelance consultant for quality assurance. Prior to her consulting work, she worked for Schering AG Berlin in its department of pharmaceuticals as an analyst, chemical development and quality assurance, responsible for GMP optimization, SOP systems, manufacturing documentation, preparation and execution of audits and inspections by authorities, training programs, qualification and validation.

Introduction Before competent regulatory authorities conduct an inspection, they will ask for a drug manufacturer s current Site Master File to become familiar with the company. The Site Master File is a company description compiled by the drug manufacturer that contains all good manufacturing practice (GMP) aspects. It is also a regulatory requirement. You can find the Explanatory Notes for the Preparation of a Site Master File (Appendix A) in Part III of the EU GMP Guideline, which was republished in December 2010. The format and structure of the document correspond to F.5 PIC/S PE 008-4: Explanatory Notes for Pharmaceutical Manufacturers on the Preparation of a Site Master File, which can be found in Appendix B. The Site Master File document is also explicitly required in Part I of the EU GMP Guideline in Chapter 4: Documentation (revised version of January 2011). The company description should meet all documentation requirements according to GMP standards. The authorities will examine the Site Master File and all references and appendices for accuracy (plausibility), completeness and actuality. So the Site Master Files becomes part of the quality assurance system of a company. A Site Master File has two purposes. First, it is intended for submission to the authorities. Second, it is expected to be a part of the management of suppliers and service providers. The Site Master File plays a further important role in project and company audits in connection with purchase and sale of shareholdings (due diligence audits). This management report will explain the purpose of the Site Master File, why it is needed, how it is structured, its scope, the associated chapters of the EU GMP Guideline that comprise the Site Master File and what information is expected in each chapter.

History The Drug Manufacturer s Guide to Site Master Files In April 1993 the Pharmaceutical Inspection Convention (PIC) published Guideline PH 4/93, a detailed guidance for preparing a Site Master File in the form of a recommendation. In November 2002 Pharmaceutical Inspection Co-Operation Scheme (PIC/S) published a revision of this document under the new title PE 008-1. The paper was supplemented with two important points: First the chapter on production updated the section Reprocessing and Reworking to include a topic on reworking processes. Secondly, the tasks and responsibilities of quality assurance versus quality control were clarified. In addition to these two major changes, the editor s coordinates were updated in the PE 008-2, July 2004 and PE 008-03, September 2007 revisions. 3

The Drug Manufacturer s Guide to Site Master Files Focus of Recent Update (PE 008-4) The Annex shaping the format and structure of contents of the Site Master File was completely revised (Chapter F.5) in version PIC/S PE 008-4 of January 2011. In addition, the contents of individual chapters were restructured, adapted to the current requirements and supplemented by numerous innovations, including: Quality management system (QMS) of the manufacturer; Release procedures; Quality Risk Management (QRM); Product Quality Review (PQR); Dealing with suppliers and service providers; Compliance with Transmitting Animal Spongiform Encephalopathy (TSE) guidelines; Use of modern control strategies such as Process Analytical Technologies (PAT) or parametric release; Traceability of batches in the supply chain; and Protection against counterfeiting and falsification. It more closely examines the pharmaceutical quality system based on GMP regulations. As a consequence the version is less detailed. In addition, some topics are no longer listed in chapters. For example, training, health and personnel hygiene are not explicitly listed in Chapter 2 Personnel and qualification, validation and calibration are no longer mentioned in Chapter 3 Premises. However, these omissions do not mean that drug manufacturers can neglect these topics. Version PIC/S PE 008-4 was the first guideline to be included in the newly created Part III of the EU GMP Guideline. The document was published under the title Explanatory Notes on the Preparation of a Site Master File. The supplement for Pharmaceutical Manufacturers was omitted. 4

Regulatory Requirements The Drug Manufacturer s Guide to Site Master Files The Site Master File as a document describing the GMP-related activities of the manufacturer is mentioned in Chapter 4 of the EU GMP Guideline in the section Required GMP Documentation. A company s obligation to answer questions and provide information to regulatory authorities is fixed in national legislation, as for example in 66 of the German Act on Medicinal Products (AMG). As for the European Medicines Agency (EMA), the Guideline on the Compilation of Community Procedures on Inspections and Exchange of Information (February 2011) makes a number of references to the necessity of consulting a Site Master File. It is a document aimed at standardizing inspections by regulatory authorities within the EU (Chapter C.10) The document structure of PIC/S PE 008-4 (Chapter F.5) is similar to the previous versions: 1. Introduction 2. Purpose 3. Scope 4. Content of Site Master File 5. Revision history 6. Annex In the following sections, italicized text indicates changes, followed by author thoughts and analysis. Introduction The Site Master File is prepared by the pharmaceutical manufacturer and should contain specific information about the quality management policies and activities of the site, the production and/or quality control of pharmaceutical manufacturing operations carried out at the named site and any closely integrated operations at adjacent and nearby buildings. If only part of a pharmaceutical operation is carried out on the site, a Site Master File needs only describe those operations, e.g., analysis, packaging, etc. The pharmaceutical manufacturer is responsible for the preparation of the Site Master File. In practice it is left to the respective drug manufacturer to decide who actually prepares the document. The contents of the Site Master File should reflect actual processes and procedures and must not conflict with the corresponding documentation. Therefore it makes sense to entrust the process to an interdisciplinary team of all divisions concerned with the preparation of the Site Master File. In many cases the head of quality assurance will coordinate this process. When submitted to a regulatory authority, the Site Master File should provide clear information on the manufacturer s GMP related activities that can be useful in general supervision and in the efficient planning and undertaking of GMP inspections. PIC/S PE 008-4 guidelines are primarily intended for submission to the regulatory authority. If the document is used for other purposes, the manufacturer shall decide whether to shorten the document or include other information. 5

The Drug Manufacturer s Guide to Site Master Files A Site Master File should contain adequate information but, as far as possible, not exceed 25-30 pages plus appendices. Simple plans, outline drawings or schematic layouts are preferred instead of narratives An inspector does not expect narrative but rather short texts with references to appendices, simple plans, drawings and schematic layouts in DIN A4 format instead of detailed text. If necessary, he or she will ask questions. However, the complete Site Master File including lists, appendices and references may depending on the size of the site and particularities of the mode of operation reach a considerable length. The Site Master File, including appendices, should be readable when printed on A4 paper sheets. The Site Master File must not necessarily be available in printed form. A transmission in electronic form is also possible. However, inspectors should be able to read the Site Master File, particularly plans, schematic layouts or comprehensive tables, when printed on A4 (or 8 1/2 by 11 ) paper sheets. The Site Master File should be a part of documentation belonging to the quality management system of the manufacturer and kept updated accordingly. The Site Master File should have an edition number, the date it becomes effective and the date by which it has to be reviewed. It should be subject to regular review to ensure that it is up to date and representative of current activities. Each Appendix can have an individual effective date, allowing for independent updating. The manufacturer should prepare and administer the Site Master File according to GMP requirements and update it at defined intervals. I recommend an interval of two years. It s also helpful to establish a change history to ensure transparency of changes and amendments made. In conclusion, it takes considerable effort to prepare and maintain a Site Master File. However, the document is so important for the authorities and other external interested parties that it justifies the effort In addition, if manfacturers use the Site Master File as a checklist, it allows them the possibility of reconsidering all operations and procedures. They can then close gaps and optimize quality management. Purpose The purpose of a Site Master File is to fulfill the European regulatory requirements. The document provides a good overview of the products, processes and organization of a drug manufacturing site. In addition, it is also helpful and valuable for internal transparency. Scope Manufacturers should refer to regional/national regulatory requirements to establish whether it is mandatory for manufacturers of medicinal products to prepare a Site Master File. Although there is no general obligation to prepare a Site Master File, the European Commission notes: These Explanatory Notes are intended to provide guidance on the recommended contents of a Site Master File. The need for a Site Master File is mentioned in Chapter 4 of the EU GMP Guideline. In Germany, the German Ordinance on the Production of Pharmaceuticals and Active Substances (AMWHV) points to the EU GMP Guideline in its Article 3 on the interpretation of the Principles of GMP, the latter thus becoming legally binding. PIC/S PE 008-4 goes on to say: These Explanatory Notes apply for all kind of manufacturing operations such as production, packaging and labeling, testing, relabeling and repackaging of all types of medicinal products. The outlines of 6