Data: a collection of numbers or facts that require further processing before they are meaningful

Similar documents
Digital Image Classification Geography 4354 Remote Sensing

DIGITAL IMAGE ANALYSIS. Image Classification: Object-based Classification

Lab 9. Julia Janicki. Introduction

Spectral Classification

A Vector Agent-Based Unsupervised Image Classification for High Spatial Resolution Satellite Imagery

Object-Based Classification & ecognition. Zutao Ouyang 11/17/2015

Classify Multi-Spectral Data Classify Geologic Terrains on Venus Apply Multi-Variate Statistics

Image Classification. Introduction to Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (SGHG 1473) Dr. Muhammad Zulkarnain Abdul Rahman

(Refer Slide Time: 0:51)

Lab #4 Introduction to Image Processing II and Map Accuracy Assessment

Remote Sensing & Photogrammetry W4. Beata Hejmanowska Building C4, room 212, phone:

HYPERSPECTRAL REMOTE SENSING

Introduction to digital image classification

Land Cover Classification Techniques

Raster Classification with ArcGIS Desktop. Rebecca Richman Andy Shoemaker

Image Classification. RS Image Classification. Present by: Dr.Weerakaset Suanpaga

The Gain setting for Landsat 7 (High or Low Gain) depends on: Sensor Calibration - Application. the surface cover types of the earth and the sun angle

Geomatica II Course guide

Pattern Recognition & Classification

Chapter Seventeen: Classification of Remotely Sensed Imagery Introduction. Supervised Versus Unsupervised Classification

This is the general guide for landuse mapping using mid-resolution remote sensing data

Lab 5: Image Analysis with ArcGIS 10 Unsupervised Classification

EVALUATION OF CONVENTIONAL DIGITAL CAMERA SCENES FOR THEMATIC INFORMATION EXTRACTION ABSTRACT

Aardobservatie en Data-analyse Image processing

Classifying. Stuart Green Earthobservation.wordpress.com MERMS 12 - L4

Remote Sensing Introduction to the course

A Comparative Study of Conventional and Neural Network Classification of Multispectral Data

Figure 1: Workflow of object-based classification

Using ArcGIS for Landcover Classification. Presented by CORE GIS May 8, 2012

INCREASING CLASSIFICATION QUALITY BY USING FUZZY LOGIC

Classification. Vladimir Curic. Centre for Image Analysis Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Uppsala University

Classification. Vladimir Curic. Centre for Image Analysis Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Uppsala University

INF 4300 Classification III Anne Solberg The agenda today:

Artificial Neural Networks Lab 2 Classical Pattern Recognition

EVALUATION OF THE THEMATIC INFORMATION CONTENT OF THE ASTER-VNIR IMAGERY IN URBAN AREAS BY CLASSIFICATION TECHNIQUES

PUTTING KNOWLEDGE ON THE MAP PROBA-V CLOUD ROUND ROBIN. Béatrice Berthelot 01/03/ /03/2017 HYPOS-PPT-37-MAGv1.0

ArcGIS Pro: Image Segmentation, Classification, and Machine Learning. Jeff Liedtke and Han Hu

Nearest Clustering Algorithm for Satellite Image Classification in Remote Sensing Applications

8. Clustering: Pattern Classification by Distance Functions

CHAPTER 5 OBJECT ORIENTED IMAGE ANALYSIS

DZD DPZ 9 Clasification. Jiří Horák - Tomáš Peňáz Institut geoinformatiky VŠB-TU Ostrava

COSC160: Detection and Classification. Jeremy Bolton, PhD Assistant Teaching Professor

Comparative Analysis of Unsupervised and Supervised Image Classification Techniques

AUTOMATIC CLASSIFICATION METHODS OF HIGH-RESOLUTION SATELLITE IMAGES: THE PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS APPLIED TO THE SAMPLE TRAINING SET

Attribute Accuracy. Quantitative accuracy refers to the level of bias in estimating the values assigned such as estimated values of ph in a soil map.

APPLICATION OF SOFTMAX REGRESSION AND ITS VALIDATION FOR SPECTRAL-BASED LAND COVER MAPPING

Dirty REMOTE SENSING : OBIA

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOMATICS AND GEOSCIENCES Volume 2, No 2, 2011

Computational Statistics The basics of maximum likelihood estimation, Bayesian estimation, object recognitions

Defining Remote Sensing

Lecture 11: Classification

About the Land Image Analyst project Land Image Analyst was developed by GDA Corp for the USDA Forest Service Chesapeake Bay Program as a land cover

Hyperspectral Remote Sensing

GST 105: Introduction to Remote Sensing Lab 5: Unsupervised Classification

IMAGINE Objective. The Future of Feature Extraction, Update & Change Mapping

Robust PDF Table Locator

The Feature Analyst Extension for ERDAS IMAGINE

Classification (or thematic) accuracy assessment. Lecture 8 March 11, 2005

Supervised vs unsupervised clustering

Fuzzy Segmentation. Chapter Introduction. 4.2 Unsupervised Clustering.

GEOBIA for ArcGIS (presentation) Jacek Urbanski

Remote Sensed Image Classification based on Spatial and Spectral Features using SVM

Uttam Kumar and Ramachandra T.V. Energy & Wetlands Research Group, Centre for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore

Application of nonparametric Bayesian classifier to remote sensing data. Institute of Parallel Processing, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences

COMBINING HIGH SPATIAL RESOLUTION OPTICAL AND LIDAR DATA FOR OBJECT-BASED IMAGE CLASSIFICATION

SOFT COMPUTING-NEURAL NETWORKS ENSEMBLES

An Approach To Classify The Object From The Satellite Image Using Image Analysis Tool

Digital Image Processing. Prof. P.K. Biswas. Department of Electronics & Electrical Communication Engineering

Fuzzy Clustering Methods in Multispectral Satellite Image Segmentation

Working Note: Using SLEUTH Urban Growth Modelling Environment

Learning and Inferring Depth from Monocular Images. Jiyan Pan April 1, 2009

Object Based Image Analysis: Introduction to ecognition

ENVI. Get the Information You Need from Imagery.

Computer Vision & Digital Image Processing. Image segmentation: thresholding

Estimating the Natural Number of Classes on Hierarchically Clustered Multi-spectral Images

Feature Selection. CE-725: Statistical Pattern Recognition Sharif University of Technology Spring Soleymani

Unsupervised Learning

MultiSpec Tutorial: Unsupervised Classification (Cluster Analysis)

Spatial Information Based Image Classification Using Support Vector Machine

Compression of RADARSAT Data with Block Adaptive Wavelets Abstract: 1. Introduction

A Comparison of Three Image Classification Techniques for Satellite Remote Sensing

Using Imagery for Intelligence Analysis

Adaptive Learning of an Accurate Skin-Color Model

Estimating Map Accuracy without a Spatially Representative Training Sample

Learning Sparse Codes for Hyperspectral Imagery

FEATURE EXTRACTION BASED ON OBJECT ORIENTED ANALYSIS

Clustering and Visualisation of Data

Event: PASS SQL Saturday - DC 2018 Presenter: Jon Tupitza, CTO Architect

CHAPTER 4: CLUSTER ANALYSIS

SD 372 Pattern Recognition

Clustering CS 550: Machine Learning

Unsupervised and Self-taught Learning for Remote Sensing Image Analysis

Structural Analysis of Aerial Photographs (HB47 Computer Vision: Assignment)

VC 17/18 TP14 Pattern Recognition

NRM435 Spring 2017 Accuracy Assessment of GIS Data

CROP MAPPING WITH SENTINEL-2 JULY 2017, SPAIN

Quality assessment of RS data. Remote Sensing (GRS-20306)

CRF Based Point Cloud Segmentation Jonathan Nation

Fast Sample Generation with Variational Bayesian for Limited Data Hyperspectral Image Classification

Copyright 2005 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers.

Transcription:

Digital Image Classification Data vs. Information Data: a collection of numbers or facts that require further processing before they are meaningful Information: Derived knowledge from raw data. Something that is independently meaningful 1

Information Classes vs. Spectral Classes Information classes are the categories of interest to the users of the data, e.g., forest types, wetlands categories, agricultural fields, urban land use, These classes form the information that we hope to derive from remote sensing data. These classes are not directly recorded on remote sensing images. We can derive them only indirectly, using the evidence contained in brightness recorded by each band of remote sensing image. Spectral classes are groups of pixels that are uniform with respect to the brightness in their spectral channels. The links between spectral classes and the information classes are the primary goal of image classification 2

Multispectral Classification is the process of sorting pixels into a finite number of individual classes, or categories of data, based on their data file values. If a pixel satisfies a certain set of criteria, the pixel is assigned to the class that corresponds to that criteria. Pattern Recognition is the science and art of finding meaningful patterns in data, which can be extracted through classification. Guiding Principal 3

Four Levels of the U.S. Geological Survey Land-Use/Land-Cover Classification System for Use with Remote Sensor Data and the type of remotely sensed data typically used to provide the information. 4

Urban Deciduous Forest Wetland Coniferous Forest Fresh Water Agriculture Ocean Water 5

For example, differences between vegetation classes are often more distinct in the near infrared than visible spectrum. Spatial Resolution (Pixel size) Spectral Resolution (Bands) 6

Spectral band 1 2 3 4 23 42 89 94 Unsupervised Classification Requires only a minimal amount of initial input from the analyst. However, the analyst will have the task of interpreting the classes that are created by the unsupervised training algorithm. Unsupervised classification is a process of numerical operations that search for natural groupings of the spectral properties of pixels, as examined in multispectral feature space. It is also called clustering. 7

ISODATA (Iterative Self-Organizing Data Analysis Technique) Makes a large number of passes through the remote sensing dataset until specified results are obtained. It requires the analyst to specify: 1. the maximum number of clusters to be identified by the algorithm. 2. the maximum percentage of pixels whose class values are allowed to be unchanged between iterations. When this number is reached (e.g., 95%), the algorithm terminates. 8

Isodata Clustering Advantage Clustering is not geographically biased to the top or bottom pixels of the data file, because it is iterative. It is highly successful at finding the spectral clusters that are inherent in the data. A preliminary thematic raster layer is created, which gives results similar to using a minimum distance classifier on supervised classification. this data layer can be used for analyzing and manipulating the signatures before actual classification takes place. Disadvantage Does not account for pixel spatial homogeneity. Supervised Classification Supervised classification is more closely controlled by analyst than unsupervised classification. In this process, the analyst select pixels that represent patterns recognized and identify the pixels as training signatures. By the training signatures, the computer system can be trained to identify pixels with similar characteristics. 9

Training is the process of defining the criteria by which patterns in image data are recognized for the purpose of classification Training Sample (Signature) A set of pixels selected to represent a potential class. Supervised Training Any methods of generating signatures for classification, in which the analyst is directly involved in pattern recognition process. Non-Parametric Rules: 1. Parallelepiped 2. Feature Space Parametric Rules 1. Minimum distance 2. Mahalanobis distance 3. Maximum likelihood (with Bayesian variation) 10

Parallelepiped Decision Rule The data file values of the candidate pixels are compared to upper and lower limits. These limits can be either: 1. The minimum and maximum data file values of each band in the signature 2. The mean of each band, plus and minus a number of standard deviations, or 3. Any limits that user defines based on the user s evaluation of the data file. Overlap Region In cases where a pixel value may fall into the overlap region of two or more parallelepipeds, the user must define how the pixel will be classified. The pixel can be classified by the order of the signatures. If one of the signatures is first and the other signature is fourth, the pixel will be assigned to the first signature s class. This order can be set in the Signature Editor. The pixel can be classified by the defined parametric decision rule. The pixel will be tested against the overlapping signatures only. If neither of these signatures is parametric, then the pixel will be left unclassified. If only one of the signatures is parametric, then the pixel will be assigned automatically to that signature s class. The pixel can be left unclassified. 11

Regions Outside of the Boundaries If the pixel does not fall into one of the parallelepipeds, then the user must define how the pixel will be classified. The pixel can be classified by the defined parametric decision rule. The pixel will be tested against all of the parametric signatures. If none of the signatures is parametric, then the pixel will be left unclassified. The pixel can be left unclassified. Parallelepiped Decision Rule Advantage Fast and simple, since the data file values are compared to limits that remain constant for each band in each signature. Often useful for a first-pass, broad classification, which narrow down the number of possible classes before more time-consuming process starts. Not dependent on normal distributions. Disadvantage Since parallelepipeds have corners, pixels that are actually quite far, spectrally from the mean of the signature may be classified. 12

Minimum Distance Rule (Spectral Distance): This decision rule calculates the spectral distance between measurement vector from the candidate pixel and the mean vector for each signature. Minimum Distance Decision Rule Advantage Since every pixel is spectral closer to either one sample mean or another, there are no unclassified pixels. a fast decision rule in computing. Disadvantage Does not consider class variability. For example, a class like an urban land cover class is made up of pixels with high variance, which may tend to be farther from the mean of the signature. Using this decision rule, outlying urban pixels may be improperly classified. Inversely, a class with less variance, e.g., water, may tend to over classify (i.e., classify more pixels than are appropriate to the class. 13

Maximum Likelihood Decision Rule (Bayesian Classifier) The maximum likelihood decision rule assumes that the histograms of the bands of data have normal distributions. It is based on the probability that a pixel belongs to a particular class. The basic equation assumes that these probabilities are equal for all classes. If the user has a priori knowledge that the probability are not equal for all classes, the weight factors can be employed to improve the classification. Mean STD Maximum Likelihood/Bayesian Decision Rule Advantage Disadvantage The most accurate of the classifiers for the pixel values that have a normal distribution, because it takes the most variables into consideration Takes the variability of classes into account by using the covariance. Maximum likelihood is parametric, meaning that it relies heavily on a normal distribution of the data in each input band. Tends to over classify signatures with relatively large values in the covariance matrix. If there is a large dispersion of the pixels in a cluster or training dispersion, then the covariance matrix of that signature will contain large values. 14