Introduction to MRI data processing with FSL. Anna Blazejewska

Similar documents
Brain Extraction, Registration & EPI Distortion Correction

Structural Segmentation

Structural Segmentation

Basic principles of MR image analysis. Basic principles of MR image analysis. Basic principles of MR image analysis

Image Registration + Other Stuff

FSL Pre-Processing Pipeline

Playing with data from lab

User s Guide Neuroimage Processing ToolKit (NPTK) Version.1.7 (beta) fmri Registration Software Pipeline for Functional Localization

Basic fmri Design and Analysis. Preprocessing

Computational Neuroanatomy

FSL Pre-Processing Pipeline

SPM8 for Basic and Clinical Investigators. Preprocessing. fmri Preprocessing

Functional MRI in Clinical Research and Practice Preprocessing

Fmri Spatial Processing

EPI Data Are Acquired Serially. EPI Data Are Acquired Serially 10/23/2011. Functional Connectivity Preprocessing. fmri Preprocessing

Automated MR Image Analysis Pipelines

Functional MRI data preprocessing. Cyril Pernet, PhD

Diffusion MRI Acquisition. Karla Miller FMRIB Centre, University of Oxford

An Introduction To Automatic Tissue Classification Of Brain MRI. Colm Elliott Mar 2014

Introduction to fmri. Pre-processing

SPM8 for Basic and Clinical Investigators. Preprocessing

2. Creating Field Maps Using the Field Map GUI (Version 2.0) in SPM5

fmri pre-processing Juergen Dukart

The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity

2019 FSL Course. Course Handbook February 2019 Dunedin, New Zealand

White Pixel Artifact. Caused by a noise spike during acquisition Spike in K-space <--> sinusoid in image space

Supplementary methods

User s Guide Neuroimage Processing ToolKit (NPTK) Version 2.0 fmri Registration Software Pipeline for Functional Localization

How to create a head model

Nonrigid Registration using Free-Form Deformations

Image Processing for fmri John Ashburner. Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, 12 Queen Square, London, UK.

ASAP_2.0 (Automatic Software for ASL Processing) USER S MANUAL

1 Introduction Motivation and Aims Functional Imaging Computational Neuroanatomy... 12

Preprocessing II: Between Subjects John Ashburner

Methods for data preprocessing

Automatic Registration-Based Segmentation for Neonatal Brains Using ANTs and Atropos

BDP: BrainSuite Diffusion Pipeline. Chitresh Bhushan

FMRI Pre-Processing and Model- Based Statistics

Anatomic parcellation based on DTI data with FSL taking the example of SMA/preSMA

Pre-processing of ASL data T CT

Statistical Analysis of Neuroimaging Data. Phebe Kemmer BIOS 516 Sept 24, 2015

Where are we now? Structural MRI processing and analysis

BDP: BrainSuite Diffusion Pipeline. Chitresh Bhushan

ECSE 626 Project Report Multimodality Image Registration by Maximization of Mutual Information

Correction of Partial Volume Effects in Arterial Spin Labeling MRI

Overview of fmri Analysis Software. McConnell BIC Open Methods Meetup January 13th 2013

Math in image processing

Head motion in diffusion MRI

Slide 1. Technical Aspects of Quality Control in Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Slide 2. Annual Compliance Testing. of MRI Systems.

MR IMAGE SEGMENTATION

RIGID IMAGE REGISTRATION

The simulator can be applied in a number of diverse applications which span both

SPM Introduction. SPM : Overview. SPM: Preprocessing SPM! SPM: Preprocessing. Scott Peltier. FMRI Laboratory University of Michigan

SPM Introduction SPM! Scott Peltier. FMRI Laboratory University of Michigan. Software to perform computation, manipulation and display of imaging data

Spatial Preprocessing

Phase Difference Reconstruction. Outline

Norbert Schuff VA Medical Center and UCSF

Surface-based Analysis: Inter-subject Registration and Smoothing

The Insight Toolkit. Image Registration Algorithms & Frameworks

Performance Evaluation of the TINA Medical Image Segmentation Algorithm on Brainweb Simulated Images

Whole Body MRI Intensity Standardization

Lilla Zöllei A.A. Martinos Center, MGH; Boston, MA

Comparison Study of Clinical 3D MRI Brain Segmentation Evaluation

Histograms. h(r k ) = n k. p(r k )= n k /NM. Histogram: number of times intensity level rk appears in the image

A Model-Independent, Multi-Image Approach to MR Inhomogeneity Correction

Image Registration I

This Time. fmri Data analysis

Normalization for clinical data

Neuroimaging and mathematical modelling Lesson 2: Voxel Based Morphometry

Sampling-Based Ensemble Segmentation against Inter-operator Variability

Preprocessing I: Within Subject John Ashburner

MEDICAL IMAGE COMPUTING (CAP 5937) LECTURE 4: Pre-Processing Medical Images (II)

MRI Physics II: Gradients, Imaging

Norbert Schuff Professor of Radiology VA Medical Center and UCSF

Motion Correction in fmri by Mapping Slice-to-Volume with Concurrent Field-Inhomogeneity Correction

Classification of Subject Motion for Improved Reconstruction of Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging

AFNI Preprocessing: Outline, Recommendations, and New(ish) Stuff. Robert W Cox SSCC / NIMH & NINDS / NIH / DHHS / USA / EARTH

fmri Image Preprocessing

Data pre-processing framework in SPM. Bogdan Draganski

ADAPTIVE GRAPH CUTS WITH TISSUE PRIORS FOR BRAIN MRI SEGMENTATION

Methodological progress in image registration for ventilation estimation, segmentation propagation and multi-modal fusion

Journal of Articles in Support of The Null Hypothesis

A Spatio-temporal Denoising Approach based on Total Variation Regularization for Arterial Spin Labeling

Ensemble registration: Combining groupwise registration and segmentation

mritc: A Package for MRI Tissue Classification

Registration Techniques

Chapter 3 Set Redundancy in Magnetic Resonance Brain Images

Preprocessing of fmri data

Image Registration. Prof. Dr. Lucas Ferrari de Oliveira UFPR Informatics Department

Function-Structure Integration in FreeSurfer

Supplementary Online Content

Role of Parallel Imaging in High Field Functional MRI

Non-rigid Image Registration using Electric Current Flow

MRI image formation 8/3/2016. Disclosure. Outlines. Chen Lin, PhD DABR 3. Indiana University School of Medicine and Indiana University Health

Norbert Schuff Professor of Radiology VA Medical Center and UCSF

Analysis of fmri data within Brainvisa Example with the Saccades database

EMSegment Tutorial. How to Define and Fine-Tune Automatic Brain Compartment Segmentation and the Detection of White Matter Hyperintensities

Human Connectom Project : The minimal processing Pipeline

HST.583 Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Data Acquisition and Analysis Fall 2008

Robust Realignment of fmri Time Series Data

Transcription:

Introduction to MRI data processing with FSL Anna Blazejewska

FSL = FMRIB Software Library FMRIB = Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain @ Oxford since 2000, last stable FSL 5.0, free! for structural MRI, functional MRI (task, resting), diffusion MRI data processing & analysis written in C++ & TCL for Linux (virtual box on Windows) & Mac OS GUI but also command line!! shell script pipelines installation: fslinstaller.py support: wiki, FAQ, forum yearly FSL courses: theory & hands on, 5 days, slides on-line http://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fslcourse/

diffusion MRI functional MRI structural MRI Why N How Seminar Martinos Center March 30, 2017 Anna Blazejewska ablazejewska@mgh.harvard.edu FSL overview registration: linear (FLIRT) & non-linear (FNIRT) brain segmentation/extraction (BET) tissue type segmentation (FAST) subcortical structures segmentation (FIRST) voxelwise GM density analysis (FSLVBM) atrophy estimation (SIENA) motion correction (MCFLIRT) EPI distortion correction (FUGUE, PRELUDE) model-based analysis (FEAT) model free ICA-based analysis (MELODIC) Bayesian analysis of perfusion, ASL data (FABBER, VERBENA, BASIL) distortion correction (TOPUP) eddy current correction (EDDY) diffusion toolbox (FDT) tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS) general: fslmaths, fslchfiletype, fslroi, smoothing, stats, fslview and more

diffusion MRI functional MRI structural MRI Why N How Seminar Martinos Center March 30, 2017 Anna Blazejewska ablazejewska@mgh.harvard.edu FSL overview registration: linear (FLIRT) & non-linear (FNIRT) brain segmentation/extraction (BET) tissue type segmentation (FAST) subcortical structures segmentation (FIRST) voxelwise GM density analysis (FSLVBM) atrophy estimation (SIENA) 1. segmentation 2. registration 3. distortion correction 4. shell scripts! motion correction (MCFLIRT) EPI distortion correction (FUGUE, PRELUDE) model-based analysis (FEAT) model free ICA-based analysis (MELODIC) Bayesian analysis of perfusion, ASL data (FABBER, VERBENA, BASIL) distortion correction (TOPUP) eddy current correction (EDDY) diffusion toolbox (FDT) tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS) general: fslmaths, fslchfiletype, fslroi, smoothing, stats, fslview and more $ fsl

1. segmentation

BET: brain extraction = skull stripping 1. segmentation goal: automatic segmentation of brain & non-brain tissue (skin, skull, eyeballs, etc.) preparation for: registration/motion correction tissue segmentation masking out non-brain problems of manual segmentation: time, training, reproducibility benefits of BET 5-20 sec, high reproducibility different contrasts T1-/T2-/T2*-w data, robust to bias field (uses local intensity changes) can estimate inner & outer skull & outer scalp surface brain non-brain Smith, SM, Fast robust automated brain extraction, HBM 17(3), 2002. Jenkinson, M et al., BET2: MR-based estimation of brain, skull and scalp surfaces, OHBM, 2005.

BET: how does it work? 1. segmentation surface = mesh of connected triangles (no folds, not cortex) histogram-based threshold t estimation t-based binarization center of gravity (COG) spherical surface initialization subdividing each triangle expanding the surface vertex locations updated based on local intensities not self-intersecting surface smoothness condition Smith, SM, Fast robust automated brain extraction, HBM 17(3), 2002.

BET: how to use it? 1. segmentation $ bet input output [parameters] -f <f> -g <g> f brain outline estimate, [0,1], =0.5 g brain outline bottom, top, [-1,1], =0 7T Philips MPRAGE 1.0 mm 3 default: f=0.5 g=0 modified: f=0.3 g=0.3

BET: how to use it? 1. segmentation $ bet input output [parameters] -c <x y z> -r <r> initial center of gravity [voxels] head radius [mm], initial r/2 -R -Z -F -m -s -o -n -A robust brain center estimation temporary add slices for small z-fov apply to 4D fmri data (-f 0.3 + dilation) save binary brain mask save skull image save brain surface outline skip segmented brain image generate skull & scalp surfaces (BETSURF)

FAST: tissue segmentation FMRIB s Automated Segmentation Tool goal: automatic segmentation of WM, GM & CSF input: BET processed images (extracted brain) single image: T1, T2, PD multichannel images pre-aligned (with FLIRT) output: binary tissue masks or probability maps http://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fslcourse 1. segmentation 1. histogram-based: uses Gaussian mixture model 2. estimates & removes bias field 3. considers voxel s neighborhood robust to noise 4. use of prior tissue probability maps GM CSF WM Zhang, Y et al., Segmentation of brain MR images through a hidden Markov random field model and the expectation-maximization algorithm, IEEE Trans Med Imag, 20(1), 2001.

FAST: histogram as a mixture of Gaussians 1. segmentation data intensity histogram model = mixture of Gaussians separation of the peaks segmentation peaks overlap segmentation more difficult for each voxel calculates: P(CSF), P(GM), P(WM) CSF GM WM WM GM CSF P(CSF) = 0 P(GM) = 400 P(WM) = 9000 GM/WM border http://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fslcourse http://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fslcourse

FAST: hard segmentation vs probability maps 1. segmentation original image 3 class probability maps segmentation CSF GM WM 7T Siemens MEMPRAGE 0.75 mm 3

FAST: bias field correction http://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fslcourse 1. segmentation low resolution, head motion, noise, blurring & bias field histogram peaks overlap RF inhomogeneity spatial intensity variations = bias field original image estimated bias field corrected image

FAST: neighborhood 1. segmentation local neighborhood information robust to noise P(class) = P(intensity) + P(neighborhood) controls contribution of neighbors vs intensity, can be set by user =0 =0.1 =0.3 =0.5 http://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fslcourse

FAST: how to use it? 1. segmentation $ fast [options] input -H -t -S -b -B -N -I -l, =0.3 input data type: 1=T1, 2=T2, 3=PD number of input data channels, =1 save estimated bias field save bias-corrected input image no bias field correction number of iteration for bias field removal, =4 bias field smoothing FWHM, =20mm -n -g -nopve number of tissue type classes, =3 save a binary mask for each class skip probability maps

FAST: use of priors 1. segmentation -a t.mat -P -A p1 p2 p3 -s file use prior probability maps for initialization (requires transformation to standard space) use prior probability maps at all stages (requires a/-a) alternative prior images for tissue classes initial tissue-type means T1-w mean GM WM CSF http://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fslcourse

2. registration

registration 2. registration = transformation of 3D volumes into the same space (coordinate system) 1. transformation 2. cost function 3. interpolation intra-subject: different modalities, contrasts, frames etc. inter-subject: different subjects to common space (population analysis etc.) MNI152 = 152 structural images, averaged after high-dimensional nonlinear registration MNI152lin_T1_1mm @ $FSLDIR/data/standards Jenkinson M & Smith. A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images. Medical Image Analysis, 5(2):143-156, 2001. M. Jenkinson, P.R. Bannister, J.M. Brady, and S.M. Smith. Improved optimisation for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. NeuroImage, 17(2):825-841, 2002.

FLIRT: linear transformation FMRIB s Linear Registration Tool intra-subject, same/different modality, DOF = degrees of freedom 2. registration rigid body = 6DOF = 3 rotations + 3 translations affine = 12 DOF = 6DOF + 3 scalings + 3 skews/shears represented by a transformation matrix a 11 a 12 a 13 a 14 a 21 a 22 a 23 a 24 a 31 a 32 a 33 a 34 0 0 0 1 coordinate vectors multiplied by the matrix define transformed coordinates http://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fslcourse

FNIRT: non-linear transformation FMRIB s Non-Linear Registration Tool 2. registration inter-subject: same anatomical region in all subjects (atlas with anatomical labels) many many DOFs, same modality, least squares cost function, bias field model (FNIRT) represented by a 3D deformation field = warp, displacement field stored as 3 x 3D volumes (x-, y-, z-components of the vectors) deformation field x-component FLIRT MNI152 FNIRT y-component z-component http://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fslcourse -6 6 mm https://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/fslwiki! inter-subject variability not very accurate! some individual features lost

cost function 2. registration registration = iterative process of finding the best alignment of 3D volumes minimizing cost function = measure of goodness of the alignment beware of local minima! local min global min local min least squares: same modality, same brightness, contrast (includes bias field model) normalized correlation: same modality, different brightness, contrast correlation ratio: any MRI modalities mutual information: any modalities (also CT, PET etc.) normalized mutual information: any modalities (also CT, PET etc.) boundary-based-registration = BBR: intra-subject, EPI to structural

http://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fslcourse Why N How Seminar Martinos Center March 30, 2017 Anna Blazejewska ablazejewska@mgh.harvard.edu interpolation =finding intensity values between grid points 2. registration nearest neighbor (NN) fast, blocky (pixelized) for labels, binary masks tri linear (TL) fast, blurring most common option spline, sinc slower, sharper images (spline not that slow) 7T Siemens GRE EPI 1.5 mm 3

FLIRT: how to use it? 2. registration $ flirt -in input ref reference out output -omat matrix -dof df -cost cf -interp it degrees of freedom, =12 cost function, =corratio interpolation method, =trilinear -searchrx min max -nosearch -usesqform -noresample search angles, =-90 90 all search angles = 0 initialize using sform/qform estimates transformation

FLIRT: example 2. registration 7T Siemens GRE EPI 1.5 mm 3 7T Siemens MEMPRAGE 0.75 mm 3 $ flirt -in input ref reference out output -omat matrix -cost mutualinfo -dof 6 interp sinc searchrx -3 3 searchry -3 3 searchrx -3 3

FLIRT: mask registration 2. registration applying existing transformation: $ flirt -in input ref reference out output applyxfm init matrix.mat -interp nearestneighbour integer, rounded mask shrinks -interp trilinear followed by thresholding: = 0.5 same size mask as input < 0.5 more PVE, > 0.5 less PVE original NN TL TL vs NN TL 0.5 vs NN TL 0.2 vs NN

http://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fslcourse FLIRT & FNIRT: weighted registration 2. registration cost function weighting for input and/or reference image values range [0,1], for corrupted areas, for important areas artifacts pathologies =1 =0 -refweight <volume> -inweight <volume> use weights for reference volume use weights for input volume

MCFLIRT: motion correction 2. registration registration of multiple frames of the same fmri scan $ mcflirt in input out output [options] -refvol -meanvol -cost cf -dof df reference frame, =middle use mean volume as a reference cost function, =normcorr degrees of freedom, =6 before -sinc_final -spline_final final interpolation choice, =trilinear -stats -mats -plots save variance & stdev images save motion parameters in*.par file save transformation matrices (in subdir) after Jenkinson, M, et al., Improved Optimisation for the Robust and Accurate Linear Registration and Motion Correction of Brain Images. NeuroImage, 17(2), 825-841, 2002.

3. distortion correction

EPI geometric distortion 3. distortion correction magnetic susceptibility = χ material s property, quantifies ability to magnetize susceptibility effects T 2 *w contrast B 0 PA brain χ <<1 air χ 0 B +Δφ +Δφ +Δφ φ φ φ Δφ Δφ Δφ dephasing 0 G y distortion AP 1. field map based distortion correction (FUGUE) 2. EPI data acquired with the opposite PE direction (TOPUP)

FUGUE: how to use it? 3. distortion correction field map B voxel shift map undo distortion (unwarp) need to have/know: field map, phase encoding direction, ESP, TEs ( TE) $ fugue -i epi p phase u output --unwarpdir=dir -dwell=esp --asym=dte -s sigma phase encoding direction, =y (usually AP) echo spacing (ESP, in sequence parameters) TE 2D Gaussian smoothing (field map regularization)! phase data must have the same FOV & resolution as EPI (may require prior resampling)

FUGUE: how to use it? 3. distortion correction magnitude TE1 magnitude TE2 phase 7T Siemens, 2mm 3 Siemens: GUI/script, magnitude data brain only (BET), output in rad/s $ fsl_prepare_fieldmap SIEMENS phz mag output dte others (or Siemens) manually: resampling to EPI resolution: flirt -applyxfm convert phase to radians & rad/s: fslmaths unwrapping phase: prelude

${FSLDIR}/etc/flirtsch/ TOPUP: distortion correction 3. distortion correction EPI data acquired with opposite phase encoding directions

${FSLDIR}/etc/flirtsch/ TOPUP: distortion correction 3. distortion correction EPI data acquired with opposite phase encoding directions

${FSLDIR}/etc/flirtsch/ TOPUP: how to use it? 3. distortion correction $ topup - imain=input - datain=ap_pa.txt -config=topup.cfg --out=output --fout=fmap - iout=corrected --dfout=deform input: combined frames with opposite phase encoding directions ap_pa.txt: columns 1-3 = phase encoding directions (3 rd one must be 0), column 4 = readout time (if vary between the volumes) config: default one $FSLDIR/etc/flirtsch/b02b0.cnf (data resolution <3.0 mm) corrected: input set of frames otherwise applytopup ap_pa.txt 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0-1 0 1 0-1 0 1 0-1 0 1

shell scripting REF=${PATH_TO_ALL_MY_DATA}/struct_brain.nii.gz for s in ${PATH_TO_ALL_MY_DATA}/epi*brain.nii.gz; do flirt -in ${s} ref ${REF} dof 6 cost mutualinfo... done; automatic! work by themselves! run multiple subjects/datasets automatically systematically explore different parameters/options run multiple processing streams in parallel reproducibility: each subjects processed the same way replicability: easy to re-run with some modification save (are) documentation of what was run easy to share with others! check the results on each stage of processing & monitor potential crashing..

Thank you! Anna Blazejewska ablazejewska@mgh.harvard.edu