Semaphores. Chapter. verview inary Semaphores for Task Synchronization utex Semaphores to Solve Mutual Exclusion Problems

Similar documents
Lecture 4: Real Time Semaphores

Experiment #3 Semaphores

Lab Manual for VxWorks

EE458 - Embedded Systems Lecture 8 Semaphores

Introduction to Real-Time Operating Systems

Experiment #7 Priority Inversion

Real Time College. These are the methods, variables and definitions that you may use throughout home and class exercises :

SYNCHRONIZATION M O D E R N O P E R A T I N G S Y S T E M S R E A D 2. 3 E X C E P T A N D S P R I N G 2018

2.c Concurrency Mutual exclusion & synchronization mutexes. Unbounded buffer, 1 producer, N consumers

Appendix Example Code

Operating Systems. Designed and Presented by Dr. Ayman Elshenawy Elsefy

Deadlock. Concurrency: Deadlock and Starvation. Reusable Resources

PROCESS SYNCHRONIZATION

ENGG4420 CHAPTER 2 LECTURE 6

C09: Process Synchronization

Concurrency: Deadlock and Starvation

What is the Race Condition? And what is its solution? What is a critical section? And what is the critical section problem?

Operating Systems. Lecture 4 - Concurrency and Synchronization. Master of Computer Science PUF - Hồ Chí Minh 2016/2017

Dealing with Issues for Interprocess Communication

Concurrency Race Conditions and Deadlocks

Lecture 3: Concurrency & Tasking

1 Process Coordination

ECE519 Advanced Operating Systems

Interprocess Communication By: Kaushik Vaghani

Concurrency: Deadlock and Starvation. Chapter 6

Lecture 6: Real-Time Timing + Real-Time Objects

Introduction to OS Synchronization MOS 2.3

Chapters 5 and 6 Concurrency

FYS4220 / RT-lab no SIGNALS

Embedded Systems. 5. Operating Systems. Lothar Thiele. Computer Engineering and Networks Laboratory

FreeRTOS. A Brief Overview. Christopher Kenna. October 1, Avionics. FreeRTOS 1 / 34

Chapter 6 Concurrency: Deadlock and Starvation

CS 471 Operating Systems. Yue Cheng. George Mason University Fall 2017

Chapter 5: Process Synchronization. Operating System Concepts Essentials 2 nd Edition

Chapter 6: Synchronization. Operating System Concepts 8 th Edition,

Lesson 6: Process Synchronization

Multithreading Programming II

Concurrency. On multiprocessors, several threads can execute simultaneously, one on each processor.

Tasks. Task Implementation and management

Module 1. Introduction:

Reminder from last time

CSC Operating Systems Spring Lecture - XII Midterm Review. Tevfik Ko!ar. Louisiana State University. March 4 th, 2008.

The University of Texas at Arlington

CHAPTER 6: PROCESS SYNCHRONIZATION

Concurrency: a crash course

CS 31: Intro to Systems Deadlock. Kevin Webb Swarthmore College April 21, 2015

Deadlock. Lecture 4: Synchronization & Communication - Part 2. Necessary conditions. Deadlock handling. Hierarchical resource allocation

Multitasking / Multithreading system Supports multiple tasks

Operating Systems: William Stallings. Starvation. Patricia Roy Manatee Community College, Venice, FL 2008, Prentice Hall

Locks. Dongkun Shin, SKKU

Chapter 5: Process Synchronization. Operating System Concepts 9 th Edition

Process & Thread Management II. Queues. Sleep() and Sleep Queues CIS 657

Process & Thread Management II CIS 657

ENGR 3950U / CSCI 3020U UOIT, Fall 2012 Quiz on Process Synchronization SOLUTIONS

Learning Outcomes. Concurrency and Synchronisation. Textbook. Concurrency Example. Inter- Thread and Process Communication. Sections & 2.

Chapter 6: Synchronization. Chapter 6: Synchronization. 6.1 Background. Part Three - Process Coordination. Consumer. Producer. 6.

Real-Time Programming

CS420: Operating Systems. Process Synchronization

Exceptions, Interrupts, and Timers

Chapter 6: Process Synchronization

Last Class: Synchronization

Module 6: Process Synchronization

Today: Synchronization. Recap: Synchronization

Process Synchronization

ArdOS The Arduino Operating System Reference Guide Contents

Concurrency and Synchronisation

Module 6: Process Synchronization. Operating System Concepts with Java 8 th Edition

Concurrency and Race Conditions (Linux Device Drivers, 3rd Edition (

The University of Texas at Arlington

CS 153 Design of Operating Systems Winter 2016

Synchronization. CSE 2431: Introduction to Operating Systems Reading: Chapter 5, [OSC] (except Section 5.10)

Chapter 6: Process Synchronization. Operating System Concepts 8 th Edition,

Data Races and Deadlocks! (or The Dangers of Threading) CS449 Fall 2017

Synchronization for Concurrent Tasks

Real Time Operating System: Inter-Process Communication (IPC)

Concurrency. On multiprocessors, several threads can execute simultaneously, one on each processor.

Chapter 5: Process Synchronization. Operating System Concepts 9 th Edition

KERNEL THREAD IMPLEMENTATION DETAILS. CS124 Operating Systems Winter , Lecture 9

Synchronization I. Jo, Heeseung

CSE 451: Operating Systems Winter Lecture 7 Synchronization. Steve Gribble. Synchronization. Threads cooperate in multithreaded programs

UNIT:2. Process Management

Chapter 6: Process Synchronization. Module 6: Process Synchronization

CSci 4061 Introduction to Operating Systems. Synchronization Basics: Locks

CS 333 Introduction to Operating Systems. Class 4 Concurrent Programming and Synchronization Primitives

Threading and Synchronization. Fahd Albinali

CS 571 Operating Systems. Midterm Review. Angelos Stavrou, George Mason University

Operating Systems: Quiz2 December 15, Class: No. Name:

Synchronization I q Race condition, critical regions q Locks and concurrent data structures q Next time: Condition variables, semaphores and monitors

Chapter 6: Process Synchronization. Operating System Concepts 8 th Edition,

Concurrency. Chapter 5

Condition Variables CS 241. Prof. Brighten Godfrey. March 16, University of Illinois

Chapter 6: Process Synchronization

Concurrency and Synchronisation

Lecture 3: Synchronization & Deadlocks

CS 333 Introduction to Operating Systems. Class 3 Threads & Concurrency. Jonathan Walpole Computer Science Portland State University

CS 333 Introduction to Operating Systems Class 4 Concurrent Programming and Synchronization Primitives

MULTITHREADING AND SYNCHRONIZATION. CS124 Operating Systems Fall , Lecture 10

IV. Process Synchronisation

Synchronization for Concurrent Tasks

Process Management And Synchronization

Transcription:

Chapter 7 Semaphores Tornado Training Workshop Copyright 7-1 verview inary Semaphores for Task Synchronization utex Semaphores to Solve Mutual Exclusion Problems

7.1 Overview Semaphores Binary Semaphores and Synchronization Mutual Exclusion Tornado Training Workshop Copyright 7-2 hat are semaphores? ow are they used

Overview A Semaphore is a kernel primitive object. Semaphore operations: Can change a task s state. Are fast. Three semaphore types available: Binary semaphores allow a task to pend until a given event occurs (e.g., an interrupt). Mutual exclusion semaphores allow a task to acquire an exclusive lock on a shared resource (e.g., a file or a device). Counting semaphores are available: Less commonly used. See manual pages for details. Tornado Training Workshop Copyright 7-3

Overview Semaphores 7.2 Binary Semaphores and Synchronization Mutual Exclusion Tornado Training Workshop Copyright 7-4 ynchronization problem. inary semaphore solution.

The Synchronization Problem Task mygetdata ( ) { requestdata( ); waitfordata( ); getdata( ); } Task may need to wait for an event to occur. Busy waiting (i.e., polling) is inefficient. Pending until the event occurs is better. Tornado Training Workshop Copyright 7-5

The Synchronization Solution Create a binary semaphore for the event. Binary semaphores exist in one of two states: Full (event has occurred). Empty (event has not occurred). Task waiting for the event calls semtake( ) and blocks until semaphore is given. Task or interrupt service routine detecting the event calls semgive( ), which unblocks the waiting task. Tornado Training Workshop Copyright 7-6

Binary Semaphores SEM_ID sembcreate (options, initialstate) options Specify queue type (SEM_Q_PRIORITY or SEM_Q_FIFO) for tasks pended on this semaphore. initialstate Initialize semaphore to be available (SEM_FULL) or unavailable (SEM_EMPTY). Semaphores used for synchronization are typically initialized to SEM_EMPTY (event has not occurred). Returns a SEM_ID, or NULL on error. Tornado Training Workshop Copyright 7-7 Symbolic constants defined in semlib.h.

Taking a Semaphore STATUS semtake (semid, timeout) semid The SEM_ID returned from sembcreate( ). timeout Can pend the task until either Semaphore is given or Timeout expires. Semaphore left unavailable. Maximum time to wait for semaphore. Value can be clock ticks, WAIT_FOREVER, or NO_WAIT. Returns OK if successful, ERROR on timeout (or invalid semid). Tornado Training Workshop Copyright 7-8

Taking a Binary Semaphore semaphore available? no task pends until sem is given or timeout timeout task unpends, semtake( ) returns ERROR yes task continues, semtake( ) returns OK semaphore given task unpends, semtake( ) returns OK Tornado Training Workshop Copyright 7-9 The semaphore is always left unavailable after a semtake( ).

Giving a Semaphore STATUS semgive (semid) Unblocks a task waiting for semid. If no task is waiting, makes semid available. Returns OK, or ERROR if semid is invalid. Tornado Training Workshop Copyright 7-10 Unblocking a higher priority task will preempt caller of semgive( ).

Giving a Binary Semaphore tasks pended? no semaphore made available yes task at front of queue made ready, semaphore remains unavailable @ Tornado Training Workshop Copyright 7-11 See the code example Synchronization Solution on page 2 of ppendix A.

Information Leakage Fast event occurrences can cause information loss. Suppose a VxWorks task (priority=100) is executing the following code, with semid initially unavailable: FOREVER { semtake (semid, WAIT_FOREVER); printf ( Got the semaphore\n ); } What would happen in the scenarios below? 1. -> repeat(1, semgive, semid) 2. -> repeat(2, semgive, semid) 3. -> repeat(3, semgive, semid) Tornado Training Workshop Copyright 7-12

Synchronizing Multiple Tasks STATUS semflush (semid) Unblocks all tasks waiting for semaphore. Does not affect the state of a semaphore. Useful for synchronizing actions of multiple tasks. Tornado Training Workshop Copyright 7-13 This routine is not available for mutual exclusion semaphores.

Overview Semaphores Binary Semaphores and Synchronization 7.3 Mutual Exclusion Tornado Training Workshop Copyright 7-14 ace conditions. btaining exclusive access to a resource via mutex semaphores.

Mutual Exclusion Problem Some resources may be left inconsistent if accessed by more than one task simultaneously. Shared data structures Shared files Shared hardware devices Must obtain exclusive access to such a resource before using it. If exclusive access is not obtained, then the order in which tasks execute affects correctness. We say a race condition exists. Very difficult to detect during testing. Mutual exclusion cannot be compromised by priority. Tornado Training Workshop Copyright 7-15

Race Condition Example ttask1 ttask2 1 char mybuf[buf_size]; /* Store data here */ 2 int mybufindex = -1; /* Index of last data */ 3 4 mybufput (char ch) 5 { 6 mybufindex++; 7 mybuf[mybufindex]=ch; 8 } mybufindex++ mybuf[mybufindex]= b mybufindex++ mybuf[mybufindex]= a... Tornado Training Workshop Copyright 7-16 Multiple tasks calling mybufput( ) may disrupt each other: Suppose ttask1 wants to add b to the buffer, and ttask2 wants to add a to the buffer. If the events happen as above, then a will be overwritten in its buffer slot, and the previous slot will contain invalid data.

Solution Overview Create a mutual exclusion semaphore to guard the resource. Call semtake( ) before accessing the resource; call semgive( ) when done. semtake( ) will block until the semaphore (and hence the resource) becomes available. semgive( ) releases the semaphore (and hence access to the resource). Tornado Training Workshop Copyright 7-17

Creating Mutual Exclusion Semaphores SEM_ID semmcreate (options) options can be: queue specification deletion safety priority inheritance SEM_Q_FIFO or SEM_Q_PRIORITY SEM_DELETE_SAFE SEM_INVERSION_SAFE Initial state of semaphore is available. Tornado Training Workshop Copyright 7-18 Symbolic constants defined in semlib.h. Queue specification determines the order in which tasks waiting for the semaphore should unblock. Deletion safety and priority inheritance will be discussed later.

Mutex Ownership A task which takes a mutex semaphore owns it, so that no other task can give this semaphore. Mutex semaphores can be taken recursively. The task which owns the semaphore may take it more than once. Must be given same number of times as taken before it will be released. Mutual exclusion semaphores cannot be used in an interrupt service routine. Tornado Training Workshop Copyright 7-19 A mutex may be given regardless of ownership by calling the semmgiveforce( ) function. This is primarily intended as a debugging aid, but the function might be used in a recovery task if the task owning the mutex dies, and the resource guarded by the mutex can be reset to a consistent state.

Taking a Mutex Semaphore owner of semaphore? no one another task this task task pends until sem is given or timeout task continues, semtake( ) returns OK, task becomes owner task continues, semtake( ) returns OK, ownership count incremented Tornado Training Workshop Copyright 7-20 Difference from binary semaphores: Can be taken more than once by a task without blocking.

Giving a Mutex Semaphore ownership count? not owner semgive( ) returns ERROR one greater than one tasks pended? decrement ownership count yes no semaphore made available task at head of queue is made ready, becomes owner. Tornado Training Workshop Copyright 7-21 Difference from binary semaphore: Only the owner of a semaphore can give it. The owner may take the semaphore more than once, but must give it as many times as it was taken in order to release it.

Code Example - Solution 1 #include vxworks.h 2 #include semlib.h 3 4 LOCAL char mybuf[buf_size];/* Store data here */ 5 LOCAL int mybufindex = -1;/* Index of last data */ 6 LOCAL SEM_ID mysemid; 7 8 void mybufinit( ) 9 { 10 mysemid = semmcreate(sem_q_priority 11 SEM_INVERSION_SAFE 12 SEM_DELETE_SAFE); 13 } 14 15 void mybufput (char ch) 16 { 17 semtake(mysemid,wait_forever); 18 mybufindex++; 19 mybuf[mybufindex]=ch; 20 semgive(mysemid); 21 } Tornado Training Workshop Copyright 7-22

Deletion Safety Deleting a task which owns a semaphore can be catastrophic. data structures left inconsistent. semaphore left permanently unavailable. The deletion safety option prevents a task from being deleted while it owns the semaphore. Enabled for mutex semaphores by specifying the SEM_DELETE_SAFE option during semmcreate( ). Tornado Training Workshop Copyright 7-23 To force task deletion, use: STATUS taskdeleteforce (tid) This routine is intended as debugging aid and is generally inappropriate for applications. If a task calls taskdelete() for another task, which has invoked deletion safety, the deleting task will block until the deletion safety is removed, after which it will unblock and successfully delete the unsafe task.

High Priority Unbounded Priority Inversion Pended thigh unblocks tmedium unblocks semtake( ) Pended Medium Priority Pended semtake( ) Ready Low Priority Critical Region time Ready Tornado Training Workshop Copyright 7-24 High and low priority tasks share a resource. Medium priority task has nothing to do with the resource whatsoever. High-priority task blocks on a mutex semaphore held by low-priority task. Can t continue until low priority task calls semgive( ). Critical region is short, so low-priority task will call semgive( ) soon if given a chance to run. Low-priority task is preempted by medium-priority task, which is not involved in the mutual exclusion. Low-priority task can t complete its (very short) critical region. This prevents the high-priority task from running.

Priority Inheritance Priority inheritance algorithm solves the unbounded priority inversion problem. Task owning a mutex semaphore is elevated to priority of highest priority task waiting for that semaphore. Enabled on mutex semaphores by specifying the SEM_INVERSION_SAFE option during semmcreate( ). Must also specify SEM_Q_PRIORITY (SEM_Q_FIFO is incompatible with SEM_INVERSION_SAFE). Tornado Training Workshop Copyright 7-25

Priority Inversion Safety High Priority Pended thigh unblocks tmedium unblocks semtake( ) Pend Medium Priority Low Priority Pended semtake( ) Critical Region time Ready Ready semgive( ) Tornado Training Workshop Copyright 7-26 The low-priority task is allowed to finish its critical region at the same priority as the high-priority task. The low-priority task returns to its original priority when it has given up all the inversion-safe mutexes which it owns.

Avoiding Mistakes It is easy to misuse mutex semaphores, since you must protect all accesses to the resource. To prevent such a mistake: Write a library of routines to access the resource. Initialization routine creates the semaphore. Routines in this library obtain exclusive access by calling semgive( ) and semtake( ). All uses of the resource are through this library. Tornado Training Workshop Copyright 7-27

Caveat - Deadlocks semtake (semid2, -1) semtake (mutex1, -1) semtake (semid1, -1) semtake semtake (semid1, (mutex2, -1) -1) semtake (semid2, -1) semtake (mutex1, -1) semtake (mutex2, -1) A deadlock is a race condition associated with the taking of multiple shared resources. May be very difficult to detect during testing. Tornado Training Workshop Copyright 7-28 Common solutions to potential deadlock situations: Use only one semaphore to protect resources that will be accessed together. Sequence accesses to resources. In above example, all tasks would take semid1 before attempting to take semid2. In the WindView graph, note that WindView can distinguish between the time at which a blocking call to semtake() is logged, and the slightly later time at which the resulting context switch occurs. The above sequence takes not quite 300 µs on a 25 MHz 68k board. INT6 is the system clock interrupt level.

Other Caveats Mutual exclusion semaphores can not be used at interrupt time. This issue will be discussed later in the chapter. Keep the critical region (code between semtake( ) and semgive( )) short. Tornado Training Workshop Copyright 7-29

Common Routines Additional semaphore routines: semdelete( ) show( ) Destroy the semaphore. semtake() calls for all tasks pended on the semaphore return ERROR. Display semaphore information. Tornado Training Workshop Copyright 7-30 If there were tasks pended on the destroyed semaphore, each pended task s errno will be set to S_objLib_OBJ_DELETED on return from that task s semtake( ) call. On a timeout, errno is set to S_objLib_OBJ_TIMEOUT, unless NO_WAIT was specified, in which case semtake( ) returns ERROR immediately, with errno set to S_objLib_OBJ_UNAVAILABLE.

Semaphore Browser To inspect the properties of a specific semaphore, insert the semaphore ID in the Browser s Show box, and click on Show. Tornado Training Workshop Copyright 7-31 A displayed timeout of zero signifies a WAIT_FOREVER.

Locking Out Preemption When doing something quick frequently, it may be preferable to disable preemption instead of taking a mutex. Call tasklock( ) to disable preemption. Call taskunlock( ) to reenable preemption. Does not disable interrupts. If the task blocks, preemption is reenabled. When the task continues executing, preemption is again locked. Prevents all other tasks from running, not just the tasks contending for the resource. Tornado Training Workshop Copyright 7-32 tasklock( )/taskunlock( ) is faster than semgive( )/semtake( ). Keep the critical region short to avoid increasing latency in the system. tasklock( ) increments a variable lockcnt in the TCB of the task making the call. If this variable is greater than zero when a preemption would ordinarily ocurr, the current task is not preempted. If the task blocks within the critical region and later unblocks, this count is still incremented, so preemption is once more locked out. taskunlock() decrements the lock count, and checks whether a reschedule must occur when the count reaches zero. Be VERY cautious making blocking calls within a tasklock() / taskunlock() critical region, as preemption lockout will be lost. Occasionally it is valid to block in such a region when it is only important that preemption be locked out before or after the block.

ISR s and Mutual Exclusion ISR s can t use mutex semaphores. Task sharing a resource with an ISR may need to disable interrupts. To disable/re-enable interrupts: int intlock( ) void intunlock (lockkey) lockkey is return value from intlock( ). Keep interrupt lock-out time short (e.g., long enough to set a flag)! Making kernel calls at task level can reenable interrupts! Tornado Training Workshop Copyright 7-33 May be called from interrupt or task time. intlock( ) does not prevent context switch, which will occur if: Task blocks (e.g., calls semtake( ), malloc( ), etc.). Task unblocks a higher priority task (e.g., semgive( )). Interrupts are unlocked whenever a task making a kernel call exits kernel state (usually just before returning from the call). Calling kernel functions within intlock() / intunlock() in a task may thus reenable interrupts and so compromises mutual exclusion. ISR stands for interrupt service routine.

Summary Binary sembcreate Mutual Exclusion semmcreate semtake, semgive show semdelete Tornado Training Workshop Copyright 7-34 Note that semflush() is valid for binary semaphores, but not mutex semaphores. ( Why? )

Summary Binary Semaphores allow tasks to pend until some event occurs. Create a binary semaphore for the given event. Tasks waiting for the event blocks on a semtake( ). Task or ISR detecting the event calls semgive( ) or semflush( ). Caveat: if the event repeats too quickly, information may be lost. Tornado Training Workshop Copyright 7-35

Summary Mutual Exclusion Semaphores are appropriate for obtaining exclusive access to a resource. Create a mutual exclusion semaphore to guard the resource. Before accessing the resource, call semtake( ). To release the resource, call semgive( ). Mutex semaphores have owners. Caveats: Keep critical regions short. Make all accesses to the resource through a library of routines. Can t be used at interrupt time. Deadlocks. Tornado Training Workshop Copyright 7-36

Summary tasklock( )/taskunlock( ): Prevents other tasks from running. Use when doing something quick frequently. Caveat: keep critical region short. intlock( )/intunlock( ): Disables interrupts. Use to protect resources used by tasks and interrupt service routines. Caveat: keep critical region short. Tornado Training Workshop Copyright 7-37