Projected Coordinate Systems

Similar documents
Projected Coordinate Systems

Helical Spring. Supplementary Exercise - 6. Objective: Develop model of a helical spring

Post Processing of Displacement Results

Post Processing of Displacement Results

Post-Processing Static Results of a Space Satellite

Post-Processing Modal Results of a Space Satellite

Post Processing of Results

The Essence of Result Post- Processing

Post Processing of Stress Results With Results

Spatial Variation of Physical Properties

Spatial Variation of Physical Properties

Cylinder with T-Beam Stiffeners

Stiffened Plate With Pressure Loading

Mass Properties Calculations

Importing Results using a Results Template

Composite Trimmed Surfaces

Post Processing of Stress Results

Multi-Step Analysis of a Cantilever Beam

Linear Bifurcation Buckling Analysis of Thin Plate

Finite Element Model

Importing Geometry from an IGES file

Post-Processing of Time-Dependent Results

Modeling a Shell to a Solid Element Transition

Importing a PATRAN 2.5 Model into P3

Using Groups and Lists

Sliding Split Tube Telescope

Introduction to MSC.Patran

Linear Static Analysis of a Simply-Supported Truss

Linear and Nonlinear Analysis of a Cantilever Beam

Building the Finite Element Model of a Space Satellite

Importing Geometry from an IGES file

EXERCISE 4. Create Lug Geometry. Objective: Write a function to create the geometry of the lug. PATRAN 304 Exercise Workbook 4-1

Load Analysis of a Beam (using a point force and moment)

Linear Static Analysis of a Spring Element (CELAS)

Normal Modes - Rigid Element Analysis with RBE2 and CONM2

Getting Started LESSON 1. Objectives: In this exercise you will perform the following tasks. Access MSC PATRAN and run a Session File.

Normal Modes - Rigid Element Analysis with RBE2 and CONM2

Imported Geometry Cleaning

Sliding Block LESSON 26. Objectives: Demonstrate the use of Contact LBCs in a simple exercise.

Rigid Element Analysis with RBAR

Modal Analysis of a Flat Plate

Normal Modes - Rigid Element Analysis with RBE2 and CONM2

Load Lug Model EXERCISE 6. Objective: Write a function to apply the loads and element properties to the finite element mesh of the lug.

Views of a 3-D Clevis

Transient Response of a Rocket

Linear Buckling Load Analysis (without spring)

APPENDIX B. PBEAML Exercise. MSC.Nastran 105 Exercise Workbook B-1

Materials, Load Cases and LBC Assignment

Verification and Property Assignment

Merging Databases LESSON 2. Objectives: Construct two databases which have distinct similarities and differences.

Elastic Stability of a Plate

Free Convection on a Printed Circuit Board

Heat Transfer Analysis of a Pipe

Large-Scale Deformation of a Hyperelastic Material

MSC/PATRAN LAMINATE MODELER COURSE PAT 325 Workbook

A rubber O-ring is pressed between two frictionless plates as shown: 12 mm mm

Direct Transient Response Analysis

Elasto-Plastic Deformation of a Thin Plate

Modal Analysis of A Flat Plate using Static Reduction

Loads and Boundary Conditions on a 3-D Clevis

Building the Finite Element Model of a Space Satellite

Restarting a Linear Static Analysis of a Simply- Supported Stiffened Plate

Finite Element Model of a 3-D Clevis

Post-Buckling Analysis of a Thin Plate

Elasto-Plastic Deformation of a Truss Structure

Modal Analysis of a Beam (SI Units)

Transient and Modal Animation

Alternate Bar Orientations

Construct Hybrid Microcircuit Geometry

SETTLEMENT OF A CIRCULAR FOOTING ON SAND

Intersecting Lamina. To complete this model you should have a working knowledge of Solidworks 2006/2009.

Forced Convection on a Printed Circuit Board

Static Stress Analysis

Nonlinear Creep Analysis

WORKSHOP 33 A1 A2 A1. Subcase 1 4 Subcase 2 X: -16,000 lbs. X: 16,000 lbs Y: -12,000 lbs. Y: -12,000 lbs. Objectives:

Lesson: Static Stress Analysis of a Connecting Rod Assembly

MSC.visualNastran Desktop FEA Exercise Workbook. Foot Support

Linear Static Analysis of a Simply-Supported Stiffened Plate

Static and Normal Mode Analysis of a Space Satellite

Static and Normal Mode Analysis of a Space Satellite

FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF A PLANAR TRUSS

In-plane principal stress output in DIANA

Quarter Symmetry Tank Stress (Draft 4 Oct 24 06)

Direct Transient Response Analysis

Tutorial 1: Welded Frame - Problem Description

Existing API Scripts. Andy Haines Senior Applications Engineer. Unrestricted Siemens AG 2013 All rights reserved.

Nonlinear Creep Analysis

Engine Gasket Model Instructions

Nastran In-CAD: Understanding Data Conversion, Data Type, and Contour Type

Scuba Tank: Solid Mesh

Linear Static Analysis of a Simply-Supported Truss

Linear Static Analysis for a 3-D Slideline Contact

Geometric Linear Analysis of a Cantilever Beam

Lesson 6: Assembly Structural Analysis

SOEM 024: Computer Aided Design. E. Rozos

Normal Modes with Differential Stiffness

FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF A PLANAR TRUSS

Generative Part Structural Analysis Fundamentals

Solid Conduction Tutorial

ME 442. Marc/Mentat-2011 Tutorial-1

Transcription:

LESSON 8 Projected Coordinate Systems Objectives: To become familiar with the difference between Global and Projected-Global coordinate systems. To realize the importance of both coordinate systems. PATRAN 328 Exercise Workbook 8-1

8-2 PATRAN 328 Exercise Workbook

LESSON 8 Projected Coordinate Systems Model Description: In the following exercise, a two-dimensional model of a connecting rod (planar, shell elements) is built in the Z plane of the Global coordinate system. Stresses in the x-direction (out of plane) should be zero, by definition of the model. In order to insure that the user gets the correct results, PATRAN utilizes a Projected-global coordinate system. Often times, this makes interpreting results easier for the user as well. Since the model is not built in the plane, the Global results will differ from the Projected-global results. For example, the stresses out of plane will be zero in both the Global x-direction as well as the Projected z-direction. This makes sense when viewing the model from the point of view of the normal (which is what PATRAN assumes you are doing with a shell model). The purpose of this exercise is to determine exactly how this system of Projected-global results works; i.e., which Global results correspond to which Projected results. Exercise Procedure: 1. Open up a new database and name it connect2. File/New... New Database Name OK connect2 In the Model Preferences form, change the maximum model dimensions to 100. Tolerance: Analysis Code: Analysis Type: OK Default MSC/NASTRAN Structural 2. Read a NASTRAN results file into the database, including both the results and the entities. Analysis PATRAN 322 Exercise Workbook 8-3

Action: Read Output 2 Object: Both Method: Translate Select Results File... OK Apply connect.op2 3. Clean up the display and change the viewpoint in order to properly view the model. Select the following two icons from the toolbar: Hide labels Left side view ou should now see a meshed connecting rod, as shown below: Z 1Z 8-4 PATRAN 328 Exercise Workbook

LESSON 8 Projected Coordinate Systems 4. Create a deformation plot to get an idea of what is happening with the model. Results Form Type: Advanced Select Result: Plot Displacement, Translational The following deformation plot should appear: Z 1Z Now that you have an understanding of how the model is behaving, clear up the display with the Reset graphics toolbar icon. 5. Calculate and compare the stress components for both a global and projected-global coordinate system. This next step will involve using multiple advanced results plots in order to determine how a projected-global coordinate system operates when compared to a global coordinate system. Results Form Type: Advanced Select Results: Stress Tensor PATRAN 322 Exercise Workbook 8-5

Type and Components... Display Results As: Type Change: From Tensor to Scalar Coordinate Transformation Options: Finite Elements OK Plot Scalar Comp Global The following should appear on your viewport: Z What you have just done is plot the tension in the x-direction of the global coordinate system. Write down the range of stresses in the following table. The purpose of this will become evident soon.* NOTE: The Coordinate Transformation Options always resets to Projected-Global. Be sure to check this toggle before getting the results for the Global coordinate cases. Comp Comp ZZ Comp Global Proj-Global 8-6 PATRAN 328 Exercise Workbook

LESSON 8 Projected Coordinate Systems Repeat the above procedure for the other five cases. To check the validity of your results, there is a table at the end of the exercise to compare them to. The projected system is defined as follows. First, the normal to the shell surface is calculated. This varies for curved elements and is constant for flat elements. If the angle between the normal and the global x-axis is greater than.01 radians, the global x-axis is projected onto the shell surface as the local x-axis. If the angle is less than.01 radians, either the global y-axis or the z-axis (whichever makes the largest angle with the normal) is defined to be the local x-axis. The local y-axis is perpendicular to the plane defined by the normal and the local x-axis. In the case of this exercise, the normal of the shell elements points in exactly the same direction as the Global x-direction. Therfore, either the y or z global axis will become the Projected x-axis. Since they both make the same angle with the normal, the global y-axis is arbitrarily made the new projected x-axis. The projected axis becomes the direction perpendicular to the plane defined by the normal (Global x) and local x-axis (Global y axis), which in this case happens to be the Global z-axis. By comparing the results written in the table, the above statement can be proven true. 6. Exit PATRAN. File/Quit... This ends the exercise. Global Proj-Global Comp -0 to 0-560.8 to 588.4 Comp -560.8 to 588.4-282.7 to 232.3 ZZ Comp -282.7 to 232.3-0 to 0 PATRAN 322 Exercise Workbook 8-7

8-8 PATRAN 328 Exercise Workbook