Design of Case Report Forms. Case Report Form. Purpose. ..CRF Official clinical data-recording document or tool used in a clinical study

Similar documents
!"# $ # # $ $ % $ &% $ '"# $ ()&*&)+(( )+(( )

How to review a CRF - A statistical programmer perspective

Common Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) Frequently Asked Questions

How to write ADaM specifications like a ninja.

CDASH Standards and EDC CRF Library. Guang-liang Wang September 18, Q3 DCDISC Meeting

CRA OC RDC Classic User Guide

Study Data Reviewer s Guide Completion Guideline

Pooling Clinical Data: Key points and Pitfalls. October 16, 2012 Phuse 2012 conference, Budapest Florence Buchheit

Discrepancy Management

Source Documentation Standards for DMID Clinical Studies. Version Nov-2005

No conflict of interest to disclose

Case Report Form Design Erik Jolles, Research Informatics, Family Health International

Office of Human Research

InForm Functionality Reference Manual for Sites. Version 1.0

An Introduction to Analysis (and Repository) Databases (ARDs)

ELECTRONIC SITE DELEGATION LOG (esdl) USER MANUAL

Cost-Benefit Analysis of Retrospective vs. Prospective Data Standardization

This is a controlled document. The master document is posted on the JRCO website and any print-off of this document will be classed as uncontrolled.

FDA Audit Preparation

The Lilly Safety Mailing Process

Introduction to ADaM and What s new in ADaM

Chapter 10: Regulatory Documentation

Why organizations need MDR system to manage clinical metadata?

Preparing the Office of Scientific Investigations (OSI) Requests for Submissions to FDA

SDTM Implementation Guide Clear as Mud: Strategies for Developing Consistent Company Standards

Monitoring Data Quality

OnCore Enterprise Research. Subject Administration Full Study

DF/HCC Operations for Human Research Subject Registration Procedures

Cite: CTSA NIH Grant UL1- RR024982

Investigator Site OC RDC PDF User Guide

Discrepancy Management

Section 14 - Study Reporting Plan

Elements of Data Management

The Human Touch: Develop a Patient-Centric Injection Device

Discrepancy Statuses In OC RDC PDF Discrepancy Management Window:

eirb Electronic Institutional Review Board User Guide For more information contact: Research Administration (803)

Standard Operating Procedure Clinical Data Management

User Guide 16-Mar-2018

How a Metadata Repository enables dynamism and automation in SDTM-like dataset generation

OC RDC HTML User Guide

Serious Adverse Events Reporting Form Completion Guidelines

Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) Research and Development Office

Investigator Activities Quick Reference Guide. Sanofi/Genzyme October 2013

Pooling strategy of clinical data

Center for Devices and Radiological Health Premarket Approval Application Critical to Quality

Protocol Deviations and Protocol Violations Made Simple. Donna Brassil, MA, RN, CCRC Rhonda G. Kost, MD

Pharmaceuticals, Health Care, and Life Sciences. An Approach to CDISC SDTM Implementation for Clinical Trials Data

Tips on Creating a Strategy for a CDISC Submission Rajkumar Sharma, Nektar Therapeutics, San Francisco, CA

Smart Measurement System for Late Phase

UDI progress in China

POLICY AND PROCEDURES OFFICE OF SURVEILLANCE AND EPIDEMIOLOGY. Procedures for Handling Requests for Proprietary Name Review.

Practical Elements of Database Design

Topics Raised by EFPIA. Webinar on Policy Jun 2017, FINAL. Presentation

Clinical trial data management technology Guide

Medical Device Usability

BioInformatics A Roadmap To Success. Data Management Plans. Wes Rountree Associate Director of Data Management Family Health International

Reviewers Guide on Clinical Trials

Common Protocol Template (CPT) Frequently Asked Questions

Implementing CDISC Using SAS. Full book available for purchase here.

Data Management of Clinical Studies

CTSU UPDATES ALLIANCE FALL MEETING

Examining Rescue Studies

Welcome! A few things to go over before we get started

General Guidance for Maintaining a Regulatory Binder

Applying ADaM Principles in Developing a Response Analysis Dataset

April 28, Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305) Food and Drug Administration 5630 Fishers Lane, Room 1061 Rockville, MD 20852

A CMC Reviewer s Perspective on the Quality Overall Summary. Arthur B. Shaw, Ph.D. FDA/CDER/ONDQA FDA DMF Expert June 15, 2010.

SITE FILE MANAGEMENT

To launch the Enrollment module and create an enrollment; click on your Menu > Enrollment

CDO Application Web Form User Guide

MTN-036 Medidata Rave Training SCHARP. Tanya Harrell & Jen Berthiaume

esource Initiative ISSUES RELATED TO NON-CRF DATA PRACTICES

NEWCASTLE CLINICAL TRIALS UNIT STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

Specification of a Cardiovascular Metadata Model: A Consensus Standard

1. STRATEGIC PLANNING

Getting Started. WCHRI Clinical Research Informatics 10/23/2015 1

2015 Vanderbilt University

Once the data warehouse is assembled, its customers will likely

Automate Clinical Trial Data Issue Checking and Tracking

Use of Standards and Conformity Assessment in U.S. Regulation: Perspective of the Private Sector

WISER. Protocol Creation, Activation, and Management TRAINING MANUAL. Wake Integrated Solution for Enterprise Research. For Oncology Studies

ProviderConnect Registered Services Autism Service Provider User Manual ASD Behavioral Assessment, Treatment Plan and Program Book Development

The Texas A&M University System. Internal Audit Department. Fiscal Year 2014 Audit Plan

OnCore Enterprise Research. Basics: Reporting and Searching

In addition, below we offer our responses to the questions posed in the Federal Register Notice announcing the availability of the Draft Guidance:

PCORI Online: Awardee User Guide Research Awards

Quality Site Visit Report

Real Time Clinical Trial Oversight with SAS

Implementing targeted Source Data Verification (SDV) Strategy in idatafax

Investigator-Initiated Research. Full Instructions Submission Website

Standard Operating Procedure. Data Management. Adapted with the kind permission of University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust

Version 11, JAN2017. Regulatory Document Approval Parameters for WebDCU TM POINT. People Document Collection REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS

University of Pennsylvania Institutional Review Board

DOD Medical Device Cybersecurity Considerations

ALBERTA ADVERSE EVENT FOLLOWING IMMUNIZATION(AEFI) HL7 MESSAGING SPECIFICATION

CTI BioPharma Privacy Notice

Certification of Physicians and Non- Physicians in the United States

Study Data Technical Conformance Guide (TCG)

Creating a Patient Profile using CDISC SDTM Marc Desgrousilliers, Clinovo, Sunnyvale, CA Romain Miralles, Clinovo, Sunnyvale, CA

The National Medical Device Information Sharing & Analysis Organization (MD-ISAO) Initiative Session 2, February 19, 2017 Moderator: Suzanne

Transcription:

Design of Case Report Forms David W. Mailhot February 23, 2010 Case Report Form..CRF Official clinical data-recording document or tool used in a clinical study PAPER RDC/RDE (Remote Data Capture, Remote Data Entry) Purpose Collects relevant data in a specific format in accordance with the protocol compliance with regulatory requirements Allows for efficient and complete data processing, analysis and reporting Facilitates the exchange of data across projects and organizations especially through standardization

CRF Relationship to Protocol Protocol determines what data should be collected on the CRF All data must be collected on the CRF if specified in the protocol Data that will not be analyzed should not appear on the CRF Protocol Analysis Plan Describes Study Conduct purpose objectives operational aspects Describes Analysis data presentations key endpoints statistical methods Case Report Form Collects data to support the above CRF Development Guidelines Collect data outlined in the protocol Collect data to support the analysis plan Collect data required by the regulatory agencies

CRF Development Guidelines (con( con t) Collect data with all users in mind Be clear and concise with your data questions Avoid duplication Request minimal free text responses Provide units to ensure comparable values Provide instructions to reduce misinterpretations CRF Development Guidelines (con( con t) Provide choices for questions where possible Use of None and Not done for assesments Collect data in a fashion that allows for the most efficient computerization Collect Collect data and formats that provides for pooling across studies CRF book needs to be finalized and available before an investigator starts enrolling patients into a study Elements of the CRF Three major parts: Header Safety related modules Efficacy related modules Module block of specific questions CRF module(s) make up a single CRF page CRF Book series of CRF pages

Header Information Key identifying Information MUST HAVES Study Number Site/Center Number Subject identification number Creating Safety Modules Ideally come from a standard library Select modules appropriate for your study Keep safety analysis requirements in mind Safety Modules usually include Demographic Adverse Events Vital Signs Medical History/Physical Exam Concomitant Medications Patient Disposition/Status at end of study Efficacy Modules Designed for each therapeutic area based on the protocol Primary and secondary efficacy endpoints/parameters Health Outcomes Assessments/Questionnaires Considered to be unique modules and can be more difficult to develop Use existing examples from similar protocols where applicable

Creating Efficacy Modules Follow general CRF design guidelines Include appropriate baseline measurements Repeat same battery of tests Define and identify key efficacy endpoints diagnostic tests for efficacy Importance of Standard CRFs Prepares the way for data exchange Removes the need for mapping during data exchange Allows for consistent reporting across protocols, across projects Promotes monitoring and investigator staff efficiency Allows merging of data between studies Provides increased efficiency in processing and analysis of clinical data CRF Development Process Drafts CRF from protocol CRF Designer CRF Review Meeting Comments back to designer Reviewers CRF Designer Updates CRF to include comments Review and Sign off/approval CRF Book Coordinate printing and distribution Site

CRF Development Process Responsibility for CRF design can vary between clinical research organizations (CRA, data manager, specialty role) Interdisciplinary review is necessary Each organization has its own process for review/sign-off Should include relevant members of the project team involved in conduct, analysis and reporting of the trial Begins As soon as possible in the study planning process (draft protocol) CRF Development Process Review Team (example) Clinician CRA Statistician Programmer Data Manager Others Database Development, Dictionary Coding, Standards CRF Development Process After the CRF book is approved Initiate the process for printing Note: the Protocol must be approved before the CRF book is approved and printed After it is printed Stored according to organizational guidelines Printed and distributed to research sites

Properly Designed CRF Components/All of the CRF pages are reusable in future studies Saves time Saves money + Poorly Designed CRF Necessary data not collected Database may require modification Data Entry process impeded Need to review/clean data increases Target dates are missed Collected too much data Wasted resources in collection and processing Delay in getting study results and ability to adequately test the protocol objectives The Case Report Form How do we use it? Collect data from the investigational sites Helps project team and study site team Reminder to investigator to perform specific evaluations CRA uses to verify protocol is being followed and compare with source documents Statistics and Programming groups use it to build database structures, develop edit checks and programming specs

The Case Report Form...Data is Used for Data analysis and reporting Subject tracking Reports to FDA on subject safety Promotional materials New Drug Application submissions Support of labeling claims Publication in medical journals Electronic CRFs The use of RDC is increasing In general, the concepts for the design of electronic CRFs/RDC screens are the same as for paper CRFs Electronic CRFs will impact the following: Review of CRF is different (screen review) No need to print and distribute paper Responsibility for Data entry Data quality checks at source Electronic CRFs and Data Capture Types of Systems Direct entry into active database Entry into local disc/holding file for later loading/transfer Entry with second review necessary in order to change status

CRF Completion Guidelines Used to give both general and specific guidance to facilitate quality data collection Partial Dates Unknowns Missed Visits Unplanned visits Discontinued Subjects May also include navigation or technical instructions associated with an EDC system Examples

Questions?