ATTACHMENT 1: TEAM ROSTERS TABLE 1 PROJECT DELIVERY TEAM RESOURCE NAME RESOURCE CODE LEAD TEAM MEMBERS PHONE NUMBER Project Manager Program Management Plan Formulator Hydrology & Hydraulic Design (PAE) Economic Analysis Inland Environmental Inland Environmental (Cultural Res) Hazardous, Toxic Radioactive Waste (HTRW) Cost Engineering Real Estate Planning Real Estate Appraisal Sponsor Support CESAM-PD-FP CESAM-PM-C CH2M Hill CESAM-EN-HH CESAM-PD-FE CESAM-PD-EI CESAS-PD-EM CESAM-EN-GE TBD CESAM-RE-P CESAM-RE-A Cobb County Water System TABLE 2 AGENCY TECHNICAL REVIEW TEAM RESOURCE NAME RESOURCE CODE LEAD TEAM MEMBERS PHONE NUMBER ATR Lead TBD TBD TBD Planning TBD TBD TBD Economics TBD TBD TBD Environmental Resources TBD TBD TBD Hydrology & Hydraulic TBD TBD TBD Engineering Cost Engineering TBD TBD TBD Real Estate TBD TBD TBD 12

ATTACHMENT 2: SAMPLE STATEMENT OF TECHNICAL REVIEW FOR DECSION DOCUMENTS COMPLETION OF AGENCY TECHNICAL REVIEW The Agency Technical Review (ATR) has been completed for the Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration Review Plan for Proctor Creek, Cobb County, Georgia. The ATR was conducted as defined in the project s Review Plan to comply with the requirements of EC 1165-2-209. During the ATR, compliance with established policy principles and procedures, utilizing justified and valid assumptions, was verified. This included review of: assumptions, methods, procedures, and material used in analyses, alternatives evaluated, the appropriateness of data used and level obtained, and reasonableness of the results, including whether the product meets the customer s needs consistent with law and existing US Army Corps of Engineers policy. The ATR also assessed the District Quality Control (DQC) documentation and made the determination that the DQC activities employed appear to be appropriate and effective. All comments resulting from the ATR have been resolved and the comments have been closed in DrChecks sm. TBD ATR Team Leader Office Symbol Date Project Manager PD-FP Date Project Architect Engineer EN-HH Date TBD Review Management Office Representative Office Symbol Date CERTIFICATION OF AGENCY TECHNICAL REVIEW Significant concerns and the explanation of the resolution are as follows: None at this time. As noted above, all concerns resulting from the ATR of the project have been fully resolved. SIGNATURE Chief, CESAM-EN Date SIGNATURE Chief, CESAM-PD PD Date 13

ATTACHMENT 3: REVIEW PLAN MINOR REVISIONS Revision Date Description of Change Page / Paragraph Number 14

ATTACHMENT 4: ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS Term Definition Term Definition AFB Alternatives Formulation Briefing IWR Institute of Water Resources ATR Agency Technical Review ITR Independent Technical Review CAP Continuing Authorities Program MCACES Micro Computer Aided Cost Estimating System CE/ICA Cost Effective/Incremental Cost Analysis NEPA National Environmental Policy Act DQC District Quality Control/Quality Assurance OMRR&R Operation, Maintenance, Repair, Replacement and Rehabilitation DX Directory of Expertise PCX Planning Center of Expertise EA Environmental Assessment PDT Project Delivery Team EC Engineer Circular PED Pre Construction Engineering & Design ECO PCX Ecosystem Planning Center of Expertise PMP Project Management Plan EIS Environmental Impact Statement RMO Review Management Organization ER Engineering Regulation SAD USACE South Atlantic Division ERR Ecosystem Restoration Report SAR Safety Assurance Review HEC RAS Hydrologic Engineering Center River SIAM Sedimentation Impact Analysis Analysis System HQUSACE Headquarters, U.S. Army Corps of USACE U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Engineers IEPR Independent External Peer Review WCS Watershed Characterization System 15