OpenCDISC Validator 1.4 What s New?

Similar documents
Study Data Reviewer s Guide Completion Guideline

Lex Jansen Octagon Research Solutions, Inc.

Implementing CDISC Using SAS. Full book available for purchase here.

Taming the SHREW. SDTM Heuristic Research and Evaluation Workshop

From Implementing CDISC Using SAS. Full book available for purchase here. About This Book... xi About The Authors... xvii Acknowledgments...

Study Data Reviewer s Guide

DIA 11234: CDER Data Standards Common Issues Document webinar questions

Introduction to Define.xml

TS04. Running OpenCDISC from SAS. Mark Crangle

Material covered in the Dec 2014 FDA Binding Guidances

Updates on CDISC Standards Validation

Beyond OpenCDISC: Using Define.xml Metadata to Ensure End-to-End Submission Integrity. John Brega Linda Collins PharmaStat LLC

Edwin Ponraj Thangarajan, PRA Health Sciences, Chennai, India Giri Balasubramanian, PRA Health Sciences, Chennai, India

CDASH Standards and EDC CRF Library. Guang-liang Wang September 18, Q3 DCDISC Meeting

Improving Metadata Compliance and Assessing Quality Metrics with a Standards Library

Common Programming Errors in CDISC Data

Lex Jansen Octagon Research Solutions, Inc.

Codelists Here, Versions There, Controlled Terminology Everywhere Shelley Dunn, Regulus Therapeutics, San Diego, California

Generating Define.xml from Pinnacle 21 Community

PMDA Valida+on Rules. Preparing for your next submission to Japanese Pharmaceu6cals and Medical Devices Agency. Max Kanevsky December 10, 2015

Controlling OpenCDISC using R. Martin Gregory PhUSE 2012 Budapest, October 2012

Advantages of a real end-to-end approach with CDISC standards

SDTM-ETL TM. New features in version 1.6. Author: Jozef Aerts XML4Pharma July SDTM-ETL TM : New features in v.1.6

Comparison of FDA and PMDA Requirements for Electronic Submission of Study Data

How to handle different versions of SDTM & DEFINE generation in a Single Study?

Paper FC02. SDTM, Plus or Minus. Barry R. Cohen, Octagon Research Solutions, Wayne, PA

How to write ADaM specifications like a ninja.

PhUSE US Connect 2019

CDASH MODEL 1.0 AND CDASHIG 2.0. Kathleen Mellars Special Thanks to the CDASH Model and CDASHIG Teams

DCDISC Users Group. Nate Freimark Omnicare Clinical Research Presented on

Dataset-XML - A New CDISC Standard

SAS Clinical Data Integration 2.6

Creating Define-XML v2 with the SAS Clinical Standards Toolkit 1.6 Lex Jansen, SAS

Standards Metadata Management (System)

Experience of electronic data submission via Gateway to PMDA

PharmaSUG Paper DS16

Submission-Ready Define.xml Files Using SAS Clinical Data Integration Melissa R. Martinez, SAS Institute, Cary, NC USA

PhUSE Paper SD09. "Overnight" Conversion to SDTM Datasets Ready for SDTM Submission Niels Mathiesen, mathiesen & mathiesen, Basel, Switzerland

Dealing with changing versions of SDTM and Controlled Terminology (CT)

Sandra Minjoe, Accenture Life Sciences John Brega, PharmaStat. PharmaSUG Single Day Event San Francisco Bay Area

Doctor's Prescription to Re-engineer Process of Pinnacle 21 Community Version Friendly ADaM Development

Adding, editing and managing links to external documents in define.xml

CBER STUDY DATA STANDARDS UPDATE

The Wonderful World of Define.xml.. Practical Uses Today. Mark Wheeldon, CEO, Formedix DC User Group, Washington, 9 th December 2008

Define.xml 2.0: More Functional, More Challenging

Revision of Technical Conformance Guide on Electronic Study Data Submissions

Study Data Reviewer s Guide. FDA/PhUSE Project Summary

SDTM-ETL 4.0 Preview of New Features

CDISC Standards End-to-End: Enabling QbD in Data Management Sam Hume

Best Practice for Explaining Validation Results in the Study Data Reviewer s Guide

CDISC Laboratory Standards Release Notes. for. Base Model Version Schema Version Microbiology Extension Review Version

SAS Clinical Data Integration 2.4

SDTM Attribute Checking Tool Ellen Xiao, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ

CDISC SDTM and ADaM Real World Issues

SDTM Validation Rules in XQuery

R1 Test Case that tests this Requirement Comments Manage Users User Role Management

It s All About Getting the Source and Codelist Implementation Right for ADaM Define.xml v2.0

Planning to Pool SDTM by Creating and Maintaining a Sponsor-Specific Controlled Terminology Database

Xiangchen (Bob) Cui, Tathabbai Pakalapati, Qunming Dong Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, MA

Out-of-the-box %definexml

Tips on Creating a Strategy for a CDISC Submission Rajkumar Sharma, Nektar Therapeutics, San Francisco, CA

Customizing SAS Data Integration Studio to Generate CDISC Compliant SDTM 3.1 Domains

A CMC Reviewer s Perspective on the Quality Overall Summary. Arthur B. Shaw, Ph.D. FDA/CDER/ONDQA FDA DMF Expert June 15, 2010.

Global Checklist to QC SDTM Lab Data Murali Marneni, PPD, LLC, Morrisville, NC Sekhar Badam, PPD, LLC, Morrisville, NC

Traceability Look for the source of your analysis results

Legacy to SDTM Conversion Workshop: Tools and Techniques

ADaM Compliance Starts with ADaM Specifications

ADaM Reviewer s Guide Interpretation and Implementation

An Alternate Way to Create the Standard SDTM Domains

PharmaSUG Paper PO22

What is high quality study metadata?

SDTM-ETL 3.1 User Manual and Tutorial

Why organizations need MDR system to manage clinical metadata?

Bay Area CDISC Network: PhUSE Working Group for Inspection Site Selection Data Standards

Streamline SDTM Development and QC

SCDM 2017 ANNUAL CONFERENCE. September I Orlando

Study Composer: a CRF design tool enabling the re-use of CDISC define.xml metadata

Aquila's Lunch And Learn CDISC The FDA Data Standard. Disclosure Note 1/17/2014. Host: Josh Boutwell, MBA, RAC CEO Aquila Solutions, LLC

Customer oriented CDISC implementation

Business & Decision Life Sciences

Pharmaceuticals, Health Care, and Life Sciences. An Approach to CDISC SDTM Implementation for Clinical Trials Data

Helping The Define.xml User

PharmaSUG Paper AD03

STUDY DATA TECHNICAL CONFORMANCE GUIDE

The Submission Data File System Automating the Creation of CDISC SDTM and ADaM Datasets

SAS Application to Automate a Comprehensive Review of DEFINE and All of its Components

Optimization of the traceability when applying an ADaM Parallel Conversion Method

ADaM and traceability: Chiesi experience

Automate Clinical Trial Data Issue Checking and Tracking

Harmonizing CDISC Data Standards across Companies: A Practical Overview with Examples

Standards Driven Innovation

Now let s take a look

SAS, XML, and CDISC. Anthony T Friebel XML Development Manager, SAS XML Libname Engine Architect SAS Institute Inc.

Power Data Explorer (PDE) - Data Exploration in an All-In-One Dynamic Report Using SAS & EXCEL

AUTOMATED CREATION OF SUBMISSION-READY ARTIFACTS SILAS MCKEE

%check_codelist: A SAS macro to check SDTM domains against controlled terminology

Standards Implementation: It Should be Simple Right? Thursday January 18, 2018

Converting Data to the SDTM Standard Using SAS Data Integration Studio

Creating a Patient Profile using CDISC SDTM Marc Desgrousilliers, Clinovo, Sunnyvale, CA Romain Miralles, Clinovo, Sunnyvale, CA

Mapping and Terminology. English Speaking CDISC User Group Meeting on 13-Mar-08

Transcription:

OpenCDISC Validator 1.4 What s New? Bay Area CDISC Implementation Network 23 May 2013 David Borbas Sr Director, Data Management Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Disclaimers The opinions expressed in this presentation are not the official views or policies of Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 2

Topics What is Open CDISC? Why is it important? View of the FDA use of OpenCDISC Validator Using the application Understanding the Validation Reports 3

Open CDISC Open Source application Java and xml Can check/validate SDTM, ADaM, SEND and Define.xml files Generate Define.xml limited Based on published standards e.g. Draft Janus validation rules and user suggested rules Currently used in the FDA submission checking process 4

FDA Review Past, Present & Future FDA Review Environment Sponsor Validation Review Past WebSDM Sponsor Data in ectd format for NDA or snda FDA Electronic Document Room Servers Present Open CDISC Validator Future 2013? FDA Review Tools WebSDM/ Empirica, jreview, SAS/JMP Open CDISC Validator Data Fit JANUS Data Views Future Additional Data Visualization Tools - Evaluation of JMP Clinical, ireview, Spotfire 5

Open CDISC Application Website location http://www.opencdisc.org/ PC specs Minimum RAM 1 GB Any Java capable PC Java version required >= ver 1.5 run check-java.bat file to confirm version Command line option available http://www.opencdisc.org/projects/validator/usingopencdisc-validator 6

What is New in Version 1.4-1 Support for SDTM v1.3 and SDTMIG v3.1.3 SDTMIG 3.1.2 amend 1 removed upgraded to SDTMIG 3.1.3 Controlled Terminology Added ability to specify CDISC Controlled Terminology versions ADaM and SEND validation Added ability to specify SEND or ADaM validation types 7

What is New in Version 1.4-2 New SDTM Validation Rules Validator 1.3 Rule Count = 227 Validator 1.4 Rule Count = 360 Updates to SDTM, SEND and ADaM rules Better support for split datasets Specify MedDRA/CDISC Controlled Terminology versions Specify SEND/ADaM validation types 8

GUI Screen View - 1 9

Directories config Note: Version 1.4 on the right panel in this and all following slides 10

Directories - data 11

Directories cdisc New directory Not present in ver 1.3 12

Directories cdisc/sdtm Terminology Directories 13

Directories 2012-12-21 14

Terminology Files Updating Terminology files Create a new directory Name with terminology version date 2013-04-12 newly added after the OpenCDISC validator ver 1.4 was downloaded 15

Updated Terminology File added! 16

MedDRA -1 Same process as Terminology versions 17

MedDRA - 2 Add the MedDRA ascii files for each version to a directory 18

MedDRA versions in the GUI 19

Using MedDRA with Define.xml OpenCDISC Validator is programmed to use the MedDRA Version that is specified in the define.xml file. So running validation with a define.xml file will support checking against that MedDRA version. NOTE: You cannot override the MedDRA version specified in the define.xml file by selecting a different version of MedDRA from the Options menu of the GUI. If you do not use a define.xml file OR the define file does not specify the MedDRA version you can use a drop down list choice during the Options selection phase of the MedDRA GUI. 20

Running OpenCDISC Validator - GUI Start in the main Validator directory where you unzipped the files and find the file client.bat. This is the file that will start the GUI and for most users will be the easiest way to run validation checking of CDISC Standards files. Select client.bat to start the program. 21

Client Application - Options Validate (data) or Generate Define.xml Standard Choices SDTM AdaM Define.xml SEND Custom (Tabular) Source / Input files: select location SAS V5 Transport Delimited (CSV, Tab etc) Configuration Depends on Standard choice Define.xml optional Reports Report settings link: use to customize report filename etc 22

Viewing the Validation Report - 1 Once the validation is complete you will see a brief summary of the validation statistics 23

Viewing the Validation Report - 2 Once the validation is complete you have three options View the validation report - click the View Report button OR Start another validation or define generation activity - click the New Session button OR Exit the GUI application by clicking the File - > Exit or the close window red x and confirm the exit. 24

Validation Report - 1 At the end of a validation run you can choose to view the report. When you select this option the spreadsheet file will open. You can review the report, save the file in another location, or attach to an email. Since version 1.3 the Excel report has been revised to improve readability. The issues summary tab is now grouped by domain The terminology issues are collapsed into instances of distinct terms. This reduces the size of the details tab. 25

Validation Report - 2 Formats CSV file unlimited rows 4 tabbed Excel worksheets 1. Dataset Summary with Error counts Errors (High) Warnings (Med) Infos (Low) 2. Issue Summary by Rule ID with error counts 3. Details dataset, variables, values, rules, messages Contains the complete list of the validation findings sorted by domain name. 4. Rules Rule ID with message, description and type Report file name and headers can be input with Protocol, date, time, other text etc Useful to communicate with vendors and internal team 26

Validation Report - 3 The Details worksheet can be filtered and sorted to identify the individual data items you want to investigate by dataset or by rule or by type of check. There are a two characteristics of this list to highlight that will aid the interpretation of your results. 27

Validation Report - 4 Unique Row Findings If the finding is related to a specific row in the data then a record number will be present. And the specific variable(s) and value(s) will be identified. If character values are placed into numeric fields OR numeric values placed into text fields these will be treated as unique records in the finding list. Global Findings Controlled Terminology findings for a variable that are present across multiple records will be counted for each specific term. 28

Interpreting the Validation Results - 1 What Open CDISC can automate for you dataset structure var names / labels data integrity checks reference to DM subjects presence of baseline flags dates after disposition Results units consistency Terminology checks referential integrity Start date before End date Disposition references - sometimes 29

Interpreting the Validation Results - 2 What you still have to do dataset structure do you have the right vars per spec? custom domains data integrity baseline flags does not see 2 per subject Review Terminology flags, If a codelist is expandable is it correct? data validation more content focused right subjects right dates right codelists right testcodes 30

Interpreting the Validation Results - 3 False positive results may occur Lab tests without units will generate error SD0026 and SD0029 e.g. Urine Ph = 5, specific gravity 1.012 Terminology Extensible codelists with non matches in the terminology file where the sponsor has added codes / values not present E.g. Oxygen Saturation as O2SAT VSTESTCD Some program bugs may generate false error messages Post to Open CDISC forum 31

Interpreting the Validation Results - 4 View of Validation Report 32

OpenCDISC Forum Feedback on this New Rule! - 1 SD1082 -- variable length is too long for actual data graded as an ERROR in the AE domain Remember All Errors should be addressed and fixed if possible prior to esubmission..note, that variable length issue is not SDTM compliance. It s very specific to SAS format used for regulatory submission. 33

OpenCDISC reply - 2 Defining requirements for variable lengths is a very interesting and controversial topic. This week we have productive discussion on FDA/PhUSE Data Validation workgroup meeting. There are several basic and mutually exclusive needs or risks. 1. Datasets should be re-sized (not compressed!) to minimal size because (very long list of reasons, e.g., data transfer, archiving storage, analysis tools limitations, hardware limitations, etc.) 2. Variables in SAS XPORT datasets should have consistent/predefined length to avoid data truncation during data integration. There are many un-perfect and un-complete recommendations how to achieve this. E.g., --TESTCD variables lengths should be always 8 Chars. 3. Variable length should be defined by data collection process. E.g., it can be set to maximum length of value in your data collection or control terminology codelist. 34

Rule change 3 New Release v 1.4.1 Note, that variable length issue is not SDTM compliance. It s very specific to SAS format used for regulatory submission. OpenCDISC validator will remove all current Variable Length related checks. Only one new Rule will be introduced. Before sending data to FDA you need to re-size you data by each variable to actual maximum value. Note, that it s needed only for actual data transfer to FDA. You can do whatever you want before this event. It s very easy to do. Profiles will be updated soon. Watch for v1.4.1 OpenCDISC Validator release in the next weeks. 35

Suggested Process for OpenCDISC Validator Review Setup / Parameters Confirm SDTM Version Confirm MedDRA version compared to Data Mgt Plan Confirm Terminology version Include the define.xml file if present Set report parameters Study Name / Number / Dates / other text / Excel message limit Run validation Review Error report Update Issue Summary tab with Comments Refer to details tab as needed Identify / report any new bugs Consider submitting an update to terminology team If final dataset for submission to CBER then complete word doc with validation findings. CBER doc UCM209772 36

Questions? 37

Thank you! David Borbas RN, MIS Sr. Director, Data Management Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc David.Borbas@jazzpharma.com P. 650-496-2637 38