Meeting. Wataru OKAMURA 26/12/2011 Osaka ATLAS meeting

Similar documents
Boosted ZHLL analysis. Wataru OKAMURA 27/12/2011

Status report. Wataru OKAMURA 06/02/2012 ATLAS Osaka meeting

Study of the Higgs boson coupling to the top quark and of the b jet identification with the ATLAS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider.

Tau ID systematics in the Z lh cross section measurement

How to discover the Higgs Boson in an Oracle database. Maaike Limper

Alignment of the ATLAS Inner Detector

Tracking POG Update. Tracking POG Meeting March 17, 2009

Monte Carlo programs

ATLAS PILE-UP AND OVERLAY SIMULATION

Tracking and flavour tagging selection in the ATLAS High Level Trigger

Event Displays and LArg

Time of CDF (II)

ATLAS ITk Layout Design and Optimisation

Tracking and Vertexing performance in CMS

PoS(IHEP-LHC-2011)002

Direct photon measurements in ALICE. Alexis Mas for the ALICE collaboration

Recent developments in tracking and

The performance of the ATLAS Inner Detector Trigger Algorithms in pp collisions at the LHC

Dijet A LL Dijet cross section 2006 Dijet A LL Preparation for Tai Sakuma MIT

Track reconstruction with the CMS tracking detector

Performance of FPCCD vertex detector. T. Nagamine Tohoku University Feb 6, 2007 ACFA 9, IHEP,Beijin

CMS FPGA Based Tracklet Approach for L1 Track Finding

ATLAS Simulation Computing Performance and Pile-Up Simulation in ATLAS

arxiv:hep-ph/ v1 11 Mar 2002

Early experience with the Run 2 ATLAS analysis model

pyframe Ryan Reece A light-weight Python framework for analyzing ROOT ntuples in ATLAS University of Pennsylvania

Physics CMS Muon High Level Trigger: Level 3 reconstruction algorithm development and optimization

Electron and Photon Reconstruction and Identification with the ATLAS Detector

Design of the new ATLAS Inner Tracker (ITk) for the High Luminosity LHC

Full Silicon Tracking Studies for CEPC

Validation of Missing ET reconstruction in xaod

An SQL-based approach to physics analysis

Performance of Tracking, b-tagging and Jet/MET reconstruction at the CMS High Level Trigger

PoS(EPS-HEP2017)523. The CMS trigger in Run 2. Mia Tosi CERN

SiD Tracking using VXD. Nick Sinev, University of Oregon

Real-time Analysis with the ALICE High Level Trigger.

Fast pattern recognition with the ATLAS L1Track trigger for the HL-LHC

LVL1 e/γ RoI Builder Prototype

The FTK to Level-2 Interface Card (FLIC)

Charged Particle Reconstruction in HIC Detectors

PoS(ACAT08)101. An Overview of the b-tagging Algorithms in the CMS Offline Software. Christophe Saout

Analysis of Failed Runs in IU Mini Data Challenge. Kei Moriya Indiana University GlueX Offline Meeting November 13, 2013

b-jet identification at High Level Trigger in CMS

Physics Analysis Tools for Beauty Physics in ATLAS

Jet algoritms Pavel Weber , KIP Jet Algorithms 1/23

b-jet slice performances at L2/EF

Performance studies of the Roman Pot timing detectors in the forward region of the IP5 at LHC

PoS(TIPP2014)204. Tracking at High Level Trigger in CMS. Mia TOSI Universitá degli Studi di Padova e INFN (IT)

Bent Solenoid C or S type. Akira SATO Osaka University Jun COMET-mu2e joint workshop

Xianyou Wang,Guoming Chen, Zheng Wang, Xianwei Meng, Jan Wang. Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS, Beijing

Understanding the predefined examples

First results from the LHCb Vertex Locator

HPS Data Analysis Group Summary. Matt Graham HPS Collaboration Meeting June 6, 2013

PoS(High-pT physics09)036

ATLAS Dr. C. Lacasta, Dr. C. Marinas

MIP Reconstruction Techniques and Minimum Spanning Tree Clustering

Modules and Front-End Electronics Developments for the ATLAS ITk Strips Upgrade

Full Simulation of Belle & Belle II SVD Detector (within ILC Framework)

H γγ. Sean Simon UC San Diego (on behalf of the H γγ WG) Photon Workshop July 23 rd 2008

MadAnalysis5 A framework for event file analysis.

Updated impact parameter resolutions of the ATLAS Inner Detector

Trigger and Data Acquisition at the Large Hadron Collider

Spark and HPC for High Energy Physics Data Analyses

Description and performance of track and primaryvertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker

ALICE ANALYSIS PRESERVATION. Mihaela Gheata DASPOS/DPHEP7 workshop

TPC Detector Response Simulation and Track Reconstruction

Expected feedback from 3D for SLHC Introduction. LHC 14 TeV pp collider at CERN start summer 2008

Fast simulation in ATLAS

Rivet. July , CERN

NuGen III. Friday, May 10, 13

ATLAS, CMS and LHCb Trigger systems for flavour physics

A LVL2 Zero Suppression Algorithm for TRT Data

π ± Charge Exchange Cross Section on Liquid Argon

Latest development for ME-PS matching with MadGraph/MadEvent

The Belle II Software From Detector Signals to Physics Results

Alignment of the ATLAS inner detector tracking system

DeepCore Veto Methods

ATLAS NOTE ATLAS-CONF July 20, Commissioning of the ATLAS high-performance b-tagging algorithms in the 7 TeV collision data

Track reconstruction for the Mu3e experiment based on a novel Multiple Scattering fit Alexandr Kozlinskiy (Mainz, KPH) for the Mu3e collaboration

Trigger information in the Atlantis event display

CMS Conference Report

Atlantis event display tutorial

A New Variable-Resolution Associative Memory for High Energy Physics

ATLAS Tracking Detector Upgrade studies using the Fast Simulation Engine

Physics Analysis Software Framework for Belle II

PoS(ACAT)049. Alignment of the ATLAS Inner Detector. Roland Haertel Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, Munich, Germany

Inside-out tracking at CDF

A Topologic Approach to Particle Flow PandoraPFA

Johns Hopkins University and CMS

HLT Hadronic L0 Confirmation Matching VeLo tracks to L0 HCAL objects

Robustness Studies of the CMS Tracker for the LHC Upgrade Phase I

LHCb Topological Trigger Reoptimization

SiD Simulation & Reconstruction. Norman Graf (for the sim/reco team) LCWS 2010, Beijing March 28, 2010

ALICE tracking system

Topics for the TKR Software Review Tracy Usher, Leon Rochester

The ATLAS Trigger System: Past, Present and Future

LHC Detector Upgrades

The CLICdp Optimization Process

Tracking and Vertex reconstruction at LHCb for Run II

Update on Energy Resolution of

Transcription:

Meeting Wataru OKAMURA 6// Osaka ATLAS meeting

NTUP_HSG5ZHLL ZHllbb_boostedFilter.py (NTUP_HSG5ZHLL) Used dataset at least jet from CamKtLCTopoJets collection with pt>5 GeV either > electrons from the ElectronAODCollection with ET > 5 GeV and cluster eta <.5, or >= muons from the MuidMuonCollection with pt > 5 GeV and eta <.6 missing ET < 5 GeV

# dataset ndataset: 6 dataset: mc_7tev.95.zhllbb_pythia.merge.ntup_hsg5zhll.e85_s_s_r7_r7_p78_tid575_ nevent: 76 xsec:.9 dataset: mc_7tev.5.t_mcatnlo_jimmy.merge.ntup_hsg5zhll.e85_s7_s74_r7_r78_p78_tid575_ nevent: 557 xsec:.455 dataset: mc_7tev.9.alpgenjimmyzeebbnp_nofilter.merge.ntup_hsg5zhll.e85_s_s_r7_r7_p78_tid57564_ nevent: 88 xsec:.6557 dataset: mc_7tev.9.alpgenjimmyzeebbnp_nofilter.merge.ntup_hsg5zhll.e85_s_s_r7_r7_p78_tid57565_ nevent: 6595 xsec:.479 dataset4: mc_7tev.9.alpgenjimmyzeebbnp_nofilter.merge.ntup_hsg5zhll.e85_s_s_r7_r7_p78_tid57566_ nevent4: 75 xsec4:.88856 dataset5: mc_7tev.9.alpgenjimmyzeebbnp_nofilter.merge.ntup_hsg5zhll.e85_s_s_r7_r7_p78_tid57567_ nevent5: 769 xsec5:.998 dataset6: mc_7tev.95.alpgenjimmyzmumubbnp_nofilter.merge.ntup_hsg5zhll.e85_s_s_r7_r7_p78_tid57568_ nevent6: 787 xsec6:.6566 dataset7: mc_7tev.96.alpgenjimmyzmumubbnp_nofilter.merge.ntup_hsg5zhll.e85_s_s_r7_r7_p78_tid57569_ nevent7: 575 xsec7:.476 dataset8: mc_7tev.97.alpgenjimmyzmumubbnp_nofilter.merge.ntup_hsg5zhll.e85_s_s_r7_r7_p78_tid5757_ nevent8: 44 xsec8:.886 dataset9: mc_7tev.98.alpgenjimmyzmumubbnp_nofilter.merge.ntup_hsg5zhll.e85_s_s_r7_r7_p78_tid5757_ nevent9: 64 xsec9:.877 dataset: mc_7tev.9.alpgenjimmyztautaubbnp_nofilter.merge.ntup_hsg5zhll.e85_s_s_r7_r78_p78_tid5757_ nevent: 8 xsec:.65646 dataset: mc_7tev.9.alpgenjimmyztautaubbnp_nofilter.merge.ntup_hsg5zhll.e85_s_s_r7_r7_p78_tid5757_ nevent: 998 xsec:.48 dataset: mc_7tev.9.alpgenjimmyztautaubbnp_nofilter.merge.ntup_hsg5zhll.e85_s_s_r7_r7_p78_tid57574_ nevent: 598 xsec:.886 dataset: mc_7tev.9.alpgenjimmyztautaubbnp_nofilter.merge.ntup_hsg5zhll.e85_s_s_r7_r7_p78_tid57575_ nevent: 48 xsec:.895 dataset4: mc_7tev.65.herwigwz_pt.merge.ntup_hsg5zhll.e85_s_s_r7_r7_p78_tid57585_ nevent4: 57 xsec4:.68 dataset5: mc_7tev.66.herwigzz_pt.merge.ntup_hsg5zhll.e85_s_s_r7_r7_p78_tid57586_ nevent5: 98 xsec5:.575

Electron Selection Object Selection - 4-vector : el_et=el_cl_e/cosh(el_tracketa), el_tracketa, el_trackphi, el_cl_e. author== author==. medium==. Et> GeV 4. eta <.47 5. OQ&446== 6. ptcone/pt<. 7. overlap removal Electron with ΔR<. to a muon candidate are removed 4

Muon Selection () - - Muon id : Staco 4-vector : mu_staco_pt, mu_staco_eta, mu_staco_phi, mu_staco_e. iscombinedmuon issegmenttaggedmuon. BLayer :! expectblayerhit nblhits>. Pixel : (npixhits+npixeldeadsensors)> 4. SCT : (nscthits+nsctdeadsensors)>=5 5. PixSCTHoles : (npixholes+nsctholes)< 6. TRT :... 7. z< mm 8. d< mm 9. pt> GeV 5

Muon Selection (). eta <.5.ptcone/pt<. I don t care smearing and scaling for electron and muon. 6

Jet Selection - - Jet algorithm : AntiKt4TopoEMJets 4-vector : AntiKt4TopoEM_pt, AntiKt4TopoEM_eta, AntiKt4TopoEM_phi, AntiKt4TopoEM_E. E> GeV.! isbadloose.! isugly 4. pt>5 GeV 5. eta <.5 6. jvtxf>.75 7. overlap removal Jets with ΔR<.4 to a selected electron are removed 7

Event Selection. HFor Rejection : top_hfor_type<4. N_good_lepton>. Trigger - - electron : EF_e_medium EF_e_medium muon : EF_mu8_MG EF_mu4_MSonly_barrel 4. Vertex : Primary vertex containing at least tracks 5. leptons of same flavour 6. leptons of opposite charge 7. 76<M ll <6 GeV 8

8. MET<5 GeV 9. At least jets.exactly b-jets - JetFitterCOMBNN>.5 Boosted cut.angular : Δφ(ZH) >π/.z candidate Pt>5 GeV.Higgs candidate Pt> GeV 9

Cut Flow

Electron details Jet details

Muon details

MET for signal MC

Mbb for signal MC 8 6 4 8 6 4 Entries 54 Mean 9. ±.985 RMS.85 Underflow Overflow Integral 58 5 5 5 4

Mbb for background MC Entries 6 Entries 86 8 6 4 ttbar Mean 47. ±.5 RMS 6.8 Underflow Overflow 568 Integral 594.5 ZeebbNp Mean 4. ± 7.4 RMS 6.64 Underflow Overflow 7 Integral 69 8.5 6 4.5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Entries 8 Entries 5 4 ZeebbNp Mean 6.6 ± 4.65 RMS 6.89 Underflow Overflow 4 Integral 77 4.5 ZeebbNp Mean. ± 4.7 RMS 57. Underflow Overflow 6 Integral 77.5.5.5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5

Mbb for background MC Entries Entries 7 4.5.5.5.5 ZeebbNp Mean 9. ± 5.55 RMS 5.68 Underflow Overflow Integral 9 5 5 5.8.6.4..8.6.4. Mean 46. ± 9.46 ZmumubbNp RMS 6.46 Underflow Overflow 6 Integral 45 5 5 5 Entries Entries 6 5 Mean 9.5 ± 5.6 ZmumubbNp RMS 64. Underflow Overflow 5 Integral 6 5 4 Mean 9.9 ± 4.8 ZmumubbNp RMS 64. Underflow Overflow 4 Integral 79 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 6

Mbb for background MC Entries 99 Entries.5 Mean 9.4 ± 6.88 ZmumubbNp RMS 57.5 Underflow Overflow 8 Integral 8.8 ZtautaubbNp Mean ± RMS Underflow Overflow Integral.6.5.4.5. 5 5 5 5 5 5 Entries Entries Mean ± ZtautaubbNp RMS Underflow ZtautaubbNp Mean ± RMS Underflow.8 Overflow Integral.8 Overflow Integral.6.6.4.4.. 5 5 5 5 5 5 7

Mbb for background MC Entries Entries ZtautaubbNp Mean ± RMS Underflow Mean ± HerwigWZ_pt RMS Underflow.8 Overflow Integral.8 Overflow Integral.6.6.4.4.. 5 5 5 5 5 5 Entries 6 Mean 9.68 ± 8.579 HerwigZZ_pt RMS. Underflow.8.6.4..8.6.4. Overflow Integral 5 5 5 5 8

Mbb for MC hs_cut Entries 6 8 54 99 86 7 Mean 9. 9.68 9.4 47. 9.5. 6.6 9. 4. 46. 9.9 ± ±.985 8.579 6.88 5.6 5.55 4.7 4.65.5 7.4 9.46 4.8 RMS. 64. 5.68 6.89 6.64 6.8.85 6.46 57. 57.5 64. Underflow Overflow 568 8 4 5 6 4 7 6 Integral 594 79 6 77 58 8 9 69 45 hs_cut hs_cut 5 5 5 hs_cut 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 9

Trigger study (After good lepton cut) el_et efficiency (?) triggered el_et ET[GeV] ET[GeV] ET[GeV]