PHY Link Channel Resource Allocation, Overhead, Impact on Procedures. Nicola Varanese (Qualcomm)

Similar documents
EPOC Upstream PHY Link Channel and Channel Probing

Adaptive Modulation and Coding

EPoC PHY and MAC proposal

Multiple Profiles for EPoC. Andrea Garavaglia and Nicola Varanese - Qualcomm IEEE 802.3bn Task Force Interim Phoenix, AZ

Multiple Profiles for EPoC. Andrea Garavaglia and Nicola Varanese - Qualcomm IEEE 802.3bn Task Force Interim Phoenix, AZ

EPoC PHY Link and Auto Negotiation. Ed Boyd, Broadcom Avi Kliger, Broadcom

802.3bn Link Ad Hoc. Meeting Notes & Baseline

MCPC IN EPOC. Ryan Hirth, Glen Kramer

802.3bn Link Ad Hoc. Meeting Notes & Baseline

802.3bn Link Ad Hoc. Meeting Notes & Baseline

Title. Figure 1 PHY Link Frame... 3 Figure 2 PHY Instruction response... 4 Figure 3 Config ID bit usage... 6

Coax ver C N ov. Steve Shellhammer, Qualcomm Juan Montojo, Qualcomm Dylan Ko, Qualcomm

Initial PHY Layer System Proposal for Sub 11 GHz BWA

BW-REQ channel design recommendations for IEEE m

Choices of Modulation Profiles for EPoC

4.3 IEEE Physical Layer IEEE IEEE b IEEE a IEEE g IEEE n IEEE 802.

Data-rate adaption function for EPoC (baseline proposal)

Overview of Broadband Cable Access Technologies

MPCP Messaging Frame Formats

Intelligent Transportation Systems. Wireless Access for Vehicular Environments (WAVE) Engin Karabulut Kocaeli Üniversitesi,2014

November 1998 doc.: IEEE /378 IEEE P Wireless LANs Extension of Bluetooth and Direct Sequence Interference Model.

802.22b NICT Proposal

ETSI Project BRAN Hiperlan Type 2 for IEEE 1394 Applications System Overview

John E. Smee, Ph.D. Sr. Director, Engineering Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. May QUALCOMM Technologies, Inc. and/or its affiliates.

Advanced Computer Networks WLAN

Multiple Modulation Profiles for EPoC

IEEE ah. sub 1GHz WLAN for IoT. What lies beneath Wi-Fi HaLow. Eduard Garcia-Villegas, Elena López-Aguilera Dept. of Network Engineering

Adaptive Bit Loading. Author/ Hesham ElBakoury Version: HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.

802.11ax for 5G. Richard van Nee

Framing, Synchronization, and Error Detection

Wireless LAN A competing method to wired LAN. Course: Wireline Communication Instructor: Prof. Werner Henkel Student: Chin Yung Lu

Transport Requirements for a 5G Broadband Use Case. Vishwanath Ramamurthi Thomas Tan Shankar Venkatraman Verizon

Mobile Communications Chapter 7: Wireless LANs

Combined EFM PHY using Single Carrier Modulation

Overview of WiMAX (Chapter 2) ENE 490 MON 13:30-16:30 Asst. Prof. Suwat Pattaramalai

Clause 45 changes for US Superframe. Authors: Duane Remein; Huawei Avi Kliger; Broadcom

Gigabit Ethernet Passive Optical Network (GEPON) Tutorial. June 2004

Coax ver C N ov. Steve Shellhammer, Qualcomm Alex Liu, Qualcomm Juan Montojo, Qualcomm

100BASE-Cu Dual Mode Proposal

Data Rate Adaptation in EPoC

Protocol Independent PHY Specific Sub-layer (PSS) for PON

Hands-On Exercises: IEEE Standard

Local Area Networks NETW 901

Performance Comparison of d OFDMA, TD-CDMA, cdma2000 1xEV-DO and a WLAN on Voice over IP Service

Implementation of a Dual-Mode SDR Smart Antenna Base Station Supporting WiBro and TDD HSDPA

Impact of IEEE n Operation on IEEE Operation

Release Note for LTE Measurement

Current and Projected Digital Complexity of DMT VDSL

IEEE PHY Overview

e-pg Pathshala Quadrant 1 e-text

LANCOM Techpaper IEEE n Overview

Lecture 24: CSE 123: Computer Networks Stefan Savage. HW4 due NOW

Modeling a MAC Scheduler: Experiences with a DOCSIS Cable

100G-EPON: Channel Bonding Placement Issues

Performance Evaluation of Standard IPACT for Future Long Reach Passive Optical Networks (LR-PON).

outline background & overview mac & phy wlan management security

ADSL (Asymmetrical Digital Subscriber Line) details

More on Super-PON. Scale Fully Passive Optical Access Networks to Longer Reaches and to a Significantly Higher Number of Subscribers

IEEE 1901 HD-PLC (High Definition Power Line Communication) Abstract

PON TC Layer/MAC Layer Specification Comparison. Yuanqiu Luo, Duane Remein, Bo Gao, Frank Effenberger

Mobile WiMAX EPL 657. Panayiotis Kolios

Lecture #6 Multiplexing and Switching

A Flexible Architecture for EPON

Lecture 25: CSE 123: Computer Networks Alex C. Snoeren. HW4 due NOW

Delivering Voice over IEEE WLAN Networks

ReDECTed Building an SDR based DECT sniffer. May 27 th, 2015 HITB HAXPO Marc Newlin

Lecture 16: QoS and "

EPoC System Level Synchronization Transport 802.3bn Interim meeting - Phoenix

TSIN01 Information Networks Lecture 3

Wireless Medium Access Control Protocols

Combining Space-Time Coding with Power-Efficient Medium Access Control for Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks

Analysis on estimated SNR values on a generic cable plant

Clause 45 changes for US Superframe. Authors: Duane Remein; Huawei AviKliger; Broadcom

Ad hoc and Sensor Networks Chapter 6: Link layer protocols. Holger Karl

Terawave Communications, Inc. P13- An EPON System Ryan Hirth September 2001 IEEE 802.3ah(EFM) Copenhagen,Denmark

IEEE MAC/CC Overview

DAB. Digital Audio Broadcasting

Physical Layer: Multiplexing, Spectrum Spreading and Switching. Covers Chapters# 06 & 08 from Text Book

R-FFT: Function Split at IFFT/FFT in Unified LTE CRAN and Cable Access Network

Flexible GFDM PHY Tutorial

Lecture 5 The Data Link Layer. Antonio Cianfrani DIET Department Networking Group netlab.uniroma1.it

Multiple Access Protocols

Mohammad Hossein Manshaei 1393

MC-CDMA Based IEEE Wireless LAN

Data and Computer Communications. Chapter 2 Protocol Architecture, TCP/IP, and Internet-Based Applications

Wireless Sensor Networks

Preliminary Performance Evaluation of QoS in DOCSIS 1.1

Outline. A Professional Company in Software-Defined Networking (SDN) Copyright , EstiNet Technologies Inc. All Rights Reserved..

The Impact of 5G Air Interfaces on Converged Fronthaul/Backhaul. Jens Bartelt TU Dresden / 5G-XHaul

MPCP Auto Discovery Baseline Proposal

SDIO PRODUCT SPECIFICATION

BEST Paper MobiCom 2017 Zhijun Li and Tian He

Computer Networks. Wireless LANs

The WAVE Communications Stack: IEEE p, and, September, 2007

LTE: MIMO Techniques in 3GPP-LTE

Dual core architecture with custom N-PLC optimized DSP and Data Link Layer 32bit controller

Mesh Networks

WiMedia Ultra-wideband: Efficiency Considerations of the Effects of Protocol Overhead on Data Throughput. January All Rights Reserved.

Radio Networks. Riccardo Cavallari. Radio Networks Office: 3 rd floor, Main Building

R-FFT: Function Split at IFFT/FFT in Unified LTE CRAN and Cable Access Network

Transcription:

PHY Link Channel Resource Allocation, Overhead, Impact on Procedures Nicola Varanese (Qualcomm) 1

Summary A PHY Control Channel (PLC) is needed for Aiding PHY initialization and CNU bring-up Broadcasting information strictly necessary to enable the operation of the PHY layer (e.g., proper demodulation and decoding of data) Collecting CNU-specific information (e.g., supported MCS in DS) It does not convey MAC Control information (GATE/REPORT messages) This presentation aims at providing more details on the PLC proposal presented in San Antonio Information carried on the PLC (DS/US) Amount of required resources and proposal for resource allocation Implications on buffering requirements and impact on upper layers Assumptions: MMP with MCS per profile (no bit-loading) In order to ensure scalability, each PHY channel (192MHz) has its own, dedicated PLC 2

Downstream PLC 3

Purpose of PLC - Downstream PLC Reference Signal: Aids PHY acquisition Carrier frequency recovery PHY frame synchronization PLC Data: Broadcasts network information + CNU-specific information OFDM channel ID DS Bandwidth (Number of available sub-carriers in this OFDM channel) Exclusion bands, e.g., Start frequency of each EB Bandwidth of each EB Info regarding PHY frame structure TDD split in terms of US/DS OFDM symbols and guard interval FDD US information: carrier frequency, number of available subcarriers Frequency Interleaving pattern (logical to physical subcarrier mapping) Time Interleaving depth for DS Active profiles (active MCS s) Timing advance information for specific CNU(s) Assignment of specific CNU(s) to a given DS/US profile Power control information for specific CNU(s) Needs definition of a PHY address 4

Evaluation of Necessary Resources (Upper Bound) Feature Item Value MMP Number of profiles 2 bits (max 4 profiles) Exclusion Bands (6MHz) Channel Structure MCS index Number of EBs DS Index of EB DS Number of EBs US Index of EB US DS channel width US carrier frequency US channel width TDD Frame Structure 4 bits (max 16 MCS) 4 bits (max 16 EBs) 7 bits (2MHz grid) 4 bits (max 16 EBs) 7 bits (2MHz grid) 13 bits (8k FFT) 10 bits (2MHz grid) 13 bits (8k FFT) 4 bits (16 possible splits) Interleaving DS Interleaving depth 4 bits (16 possible values) CNU-specific message CNU ID Timing advance Power control DS profile assigned US profile assigned 48 bits (full Eth. address) 16 bits (1.2 ns resolution with 80us symbol duration) 4 bits 2 bits 2 bits Error Control CRC 16 bits Total: <50 Bytes (accounting also for an additional PLC header field) Resources needed: 648 bits (802.11n code rate 3/4) 162 QAM symbols (16QAM modulation) 5

A First Proposal for DS PHY Link We propose to allocate a limited number of symbols for PLC Data in order to perform Time interleaving Repetition of PLC Data PLC includes reference signals (RS) for PHY acquisition ( preamble ) Example configuration (8k FFT would scale accordingly for a different FFT size): 4 OFDM symbols PLC RS PLC Data 128 subcarriers Why it is good to have a wide-band preamble: Pre-FFT detection (time-domain processing) Resilient to: Residual Timing Offset (FFT window placement) Residual Carrier Frequency Offset (causes inter-carrier-interference) Channel delay spread (non-coherent detection) 6

Resources Reserved for PLC - Downstream Physical layer frame Physical layer frame Physical layer frame 1 OFDM Channel frequency time Frequency location: 1 OFDM symbol We propose to locate the PLC around the center frequency of the OFDM channel Does it really make sense to center an OFDM channel right on top of an Exclusion Band? Alternatively, we may define a small set of pre-defined center frequencies on the 2MHz grid. Time location: A fixed number of subcarriers within the first few symbols of a PHY frame Incurred overhead is the bare minimum Rate adaptation is performed according to the net PHY rate (accounting for all overheads)» MAC is aware of the net PHY rate (accounting for all overheads). Moderate increase of buffering requirements at the PHY (see next slide) 7

Buffering Requirements N P N F bits Δ buffer PHY buffer size in bits n P n S R PHY n S frequency time 1 OFDM symbol N P N F OFDM symbol# No interleaving (worst case): proportional to the PLC overhead and PHY frame duration in symbols (N FRAME ) R PHY is the maximum possible PHY rate in bps/hz (accounting for all overheads) Buffer increase can be quantified as Δ buffer = R PHY n P N P [bits] The relative buffer increase can be computed as Δ buffer% = R PHY n P N P R PHY n S 100 = n P N P n S N F N F 100 Same buffering requirements apply at both TX and RX side Nominal Buffering requirements for a single OFDM symbol Buffer increase % = OH PLC x N F x 100 8

Preamble Structure in Time The preamble signal is designed so that in the time domain (after band-pass filtering) it appears as a periodic/repeating sequence Periodic structure is not affected by convolution with channel Periodic structure facilitates CFO and Rx I/Q imbalance estimation Also, the resulting estimate already makes use of all the energy coming from the channel, without the need for a multi-finger correlation 1 OFDM symbol: N SC + N CP samples N CP samples Phase rotation bw two successive periods provides a measure of CFO Result of convolution with channel N SC /M samples 9

frequency N SC subcarriers K subcarriers Preamble Structure in Frequency and Time Time-periodic structure with M repetitions is induced by employing only 1 subcarrier out of M in the frequency domain Energy loss due to subcarrier nulling can be partially or entirely recovered by boosting the power of preamble QAM symbols E.g., M=2 leads to an energy loss of 3dB. This can be compensated by a 3dB power boost of the Preamble subcarriers. Guard band M-1 subcarriers are nulled DC IFFT+CP insertion N SC samples 1 2 3 M Used subcarriers N CP samples N SC /M samples Guard band time 10

frequency N SC subcarriers Initial PHY Acquisition Procedure Filtering N CP samples N SC samples 1 2 3 M time time Time-domain processing Time-domain searcher at the CNU (pre-fft) 1. Filter subcarriers where we expect to find the PLC 2. Run preamble detector 3. Estimate PHY parameters Carrier Frequency Offset Raw symbol timing synchronization Gain control Others as needed 4. Find FFT boundaries (fine symbol timing synchronization) 5. Perform IFFT and decode PLC information only 11

Upstream PLC 12

Purpose of PLC - Upstream PLC Reference Signal: Aids PHY procedures Timing advance estimation for the CNU which is transmitting Assignment of the CNU to a specific US profile (evaluation of US MCS) PLC Data: CNU-specific information PHY address identifying this CNU Supported MCS for DS for this CNU (needed to assign CNU to a specific DS profile) Unusable sub-carriers in DS for this CNU (needed by CLT to determine Exclusion Bands in DS) Protected with a strong FEC code Feature Item Value CNU-specific CNU ID 48 bits (full Eth. address) DS profile supported 2 bits Number of EBs DS 4 bits (max 16 EBs) Index of EB DS 7 bits (2MHz grid) Error Control CRC 16 bits 13

Resources Reserved for PLC - Upstream The upstream PLC is accessed with a contention-based protocol Resources need to be reserved for the PLC in upstream Reserve a fixed number of OFDM symbols within a PHY frame Physical layer frame frequency time 14

Resources Reserved for PLC - Upstream The upstream PLC is accessed with a contention-based protocol Resources need to be reserved for the PLC in upstream Reserve a fixed number of OFDM symbols within a PHY frame Features: CLT estimates full channel for the user and assigns US profile CLT estimates timing advance (to compensate propagation delay) CLT estimates optimal power control settings CNU is identified after decoding PLC Data Transmission from a specific CNU (no collisions) Propagation delay PLC Data PLC RS 15

Resource Mapping With the proposed frame structure for upstream, data transmission is not allowed in the two (or more) OFDM symbols dedicated for the US PLC. However, at the xmii interface, we require a full-duplex, continuous transmission This can be enforced by a proper mapping between the xmii time scale and the PHY time scale One-to-one map of time intervals (see figure) An additional 1D-to-2D map may be needed to map time intervals to time/frequency resources Increased buffering requirements (see next slide) grant of time quanta resources xmii Dimension of US PLC is here exaggerated Physical layer frame Upstream resources Physical medium 16

Buffering Requirements N P N F bits PHY buffer size in bits n S Δ buffer frequency time 1 OFDM symbol R PHY n S N P N F OFDM symbol# Analysis is analogous to DS case: R PHY is the maximum possible PHY rate in bps/hz (accounting for all overheads) Buffer increase can be quantified as Δ buffer = R PHY n S N P [bits] The relative buffer increase can be computed as Δ buffer% = R PHY n S N P R PHY n S 100 = N P N F N F 100 This requirement (and the related delay) applies at both TX and RX side Nominal Buffering requirements for a single OFDM symbol Buffer increase % = OH PLC x N F x 100 17

Initialization Procedure 18

Timeline of PHY Initialization Procedure CLT PHY CNU PHY DS MCS supported by this CNU Unusable sub-carriers for this CNU Timing advance for this CNU Power control for this CNU US MCS supported by this CNU DS PCCH US PCCH DS PCCH PHY Frame structure Time interleaving depth, etc PHY Time/Frequency Synch DS MCS supported by this CNU Power control for this CNU Timing advance for this CNU DS profile for this CNU US profile for this CNU Supported US/DS PHY throughput via MDIO MAC MAC Supported US/DS PHY throughput via MDIO MPCP Procedures Information from CCH Determined at receiver 19

Overall Delay for Upstream Transmission Let s assume that we have no PHY processing delays and we have only propagation delays Let s assume that PHY initialization has been successful Proper timing advance is performed at the PHY layer We can evaluate the overall upstream delay at the xmii interface: xmii @CNU Upstream resources T Δ Physical medium @CNU τ p Physical medium @CLT xmii @CLT T Δ + τ p 20

RTT Measurement (including PHY processing delays) Discovery gate PHY delay Physical layer frame xmii @CLT Physical medium @CLT Physical propagation delay Physical medium @CNU PHY delay Granted time quanta xmii @CNU Registration message xmii @CNU PHY delay Upstream resources Physical medium @CNU Physical propagation delay Physical medium @CLT PHY delay xmii @CLT 21

RTT Measurement (including PHY processing delays) Discovery gate t 0 PHY delay Physical layer frame xmii @CLT Physical medium @CLT Physical propagation delay Physical medium @CNU PHY delay t 0 xmii @CNU t 1 xmii @CNU PHY delay Upstream resources Physical medium @CNU Physical propagation delay RTT components Physical medium @CLT PHY delay xmii @CLT t 2 22

RTT Measurement The sum of the two RTT components is (assuming symmetric PHY processing delays for simplicity) RTT = 2τ PHY delay + τ p + 2τ PHY delay + τ p +T Δ = 4τ PHY delay + 2τ p +T Δ Increase in RTT is limited to the time interval when transmission is not allowed (T Δ ) 2 OFDM symbols in our case RTT measurement can be carried out at the xmii level using the same procedures employed in EPON. 23

Notes on PHY Initialization Procedures There is no need for a complex protocol for exchanging information over the PLC Simple three-way exchange DS PLC is a broadcast channel i.e., information on the PLC can be decoded by all CNUs It contains both broadcast (network info) and unicast (CNU-specific) information US PLC carries only CNU-specific information RTT measurement and upper-layer procedures are not affected by the amount of resources occupied by PLC Buffering requirements have been quantified 24

Proposals For Downstream, PLC is carried only in selected few OFDM symbols within a PHY frame Simple PHY initialization procedure (Slide 19) 25