Thermal Coupling Method Between SPH Particles and Solid Elements in LS-DYNA

Similar documents
Thermal Coupling Method Between SPH Particles and Solid Elements in LS-DYNA

Applications of ICFD /SPH Solvers by LS-DYNA to Solve Water Splashing Impact to Automobile Body. Abstract

Modelling of Impact on a Fuel Tank Using Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics

SPH: Why and what for?

C. A. D. Fraga Filho 1,2, D. F. Pezzin 1 & J. T. A. Chacaltana 1. Abstract

Divergence-Free Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics

Interaction of Fluid Simulation Based on PhysX Physics Engine. Huibai Wang, Jianfei Wan, Fengquan Zhang

Simulation of Fuel Sloshing Comparative Study

Smoothed Particle Galerkin Method with a Momentum-Consistent Smoothing Algorithm for Coupled Thermal-Structural Analysis

CGT 581 G Fluids. Overview. Some terms. Some terms

A Geometric Approach to Animating Thin Surface Features in SPH Water

LS-DYNA Smooth Particle Galerkin (SPG) Method

Comparison between incompressible SPH solvers

Robust Simulation of Sparsely Sampled Thin Features in SPH-Based Free Surface Flows

Finite Element Simulation using SPH Particles as Loading on Typical Light Armoured Vehicles

14 Dec 94. Hydrocode Micro-Model Concept for Multi-Component Flow in Sediments Hans U. Mair

University of Quebec at Chicoutimi (UQAC) Friction Stir Welding Research Group. A CUDA Fortran. Story

Example 13 - Shock Tube

Particle-based Fluid Simulation

SIMULATION OF A DETONATION CHAMBER TEST CASE

The Immersed Smoothed Particle Galerkin Method in LS-DYNA for Material Failure Analysis of Fiber-Reinforced Solid Structures

3D Simulation of Dam-break effect on a Solid Wall using Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamic

SOIL-MACHINE INTERACTION: SIMULATION AND TESTING

1.6 Smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH)

Particle-Based Fluid Simulation. CSE169: Computer Animation Steve Rotenberg UCSD, Spring 2016

PARALLEL SIMULATION OF A FLUID FLOW BY MEANS OF THE SPH METHOD: OPENMP VS. MPI COMPARISON. Pawe l Wróblewski, Krzysztof Boryczko

Simulation of Automotive Fuel Tank Sloshing using Radioss

SPH METHOD IN APPLIED MECHANICS

Dynamical Simulation 1: Particle Systems and ODEs

Characteristic Aspects of SPH Solutions

A Particle Cellular Automata Model for Fluid Simulations

Numerical Simulation of Coastal Wave Processes with the Use of Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) Method

Partial Differential Equations

SPH: Towards the simulation of wave-body interactions in extreme seas

Fluid-Structure-Interaction Using SPH and GPGPU Technology

Support for Multi physics in Chrono

Lagrangian methods and Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) Computation in Astrophysics Seminar (Spring 2006) L. J. Dursi

LS-DYNA 980 : Recent Developments, Application Areas and Validation Process of the Incompressible fluid solver (ICFD) in LS-DYNA.

Recent Developments and Roadmap Part 0: Introduction. 12 th International LS-DYNA User s Conference June 5, 2012

Technical Sciences Academy of Romania Received 3 February 2016 Accepted 2 September 2016 Received in revised from 1 August 2016

Transfer and pouring processes of casting by smoothed particle. hydrodynamic method

"The real world is nonlinear"... 7 main Advantages using Abaqus

Scalability Study of Particle Method with Dynamic Load Balancing

Fluid Simulation. [Thürey 10] [Pfaff 10] [Chentanez 11]

Application of the SPH Method for Simulation of Aerospace Structures under Impact Loading

FINITE ELEMENT MODELING OF THICK PLATE PENETRATIONS IN SMALL CAL MUNITIONS

2.7 Cloth Animation. Jacobs University Visualization and Computer Graphics Lab : Advanced Graphics - Chapter 2 123

An explicit feature control approach in structural topology optimization

Navier-Stokes & Flow Simulation

Navier-Stokes & Flow Simulation

Analysis of Fluid-Structure Interaction Effects of Liquid-Filled Container under Drop Testing

COMPUTATIONAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MECHANICS RESEARCH GROUP

GALAXY ADVANCED ENGINEERING, INC. P.O. BOX 614 BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA Tel: (650) Fax: (650)

Modeling of Fuel Sloshing Phenomena Considering Solid-Fluid Interaction

This tutorial illustrates how to set up and solve a problem involving solidification. This tutorial will demonstrate how to do the following:

Smoke Simulation using Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) Shruti Jain MSc Computer Animation and Visual Eects Bournemouth University

How TMG Uses Elements and Nodes

Simulation of liquid cube fracture with SPH

A Review of S-ALE Solver for Blast Simulations

Fluid-structure Interaction by the mixed SPH-FE Method with Application to Aircraft Ditching

Recent Developments in LS-DYNA II

More Animation Techniques

LS-Dyna CAE A ssociates Associates

GPU Simulations of Violent Flows with Smooth Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) Method

MODELLING WATER ENTRY OF A WEDGE BY MULTIPHASE SPH METHOD. Kai GONG, Benlong WANG and Hua LIU 1

Acknowledgements. Prof. Dan Negrut Prof. Darryl Thelen Prof. Michael Zinn. SBEL Colleagues: Hammad Mazar, Toby Heyn, Manoj Kumar

OVERVIEW OF ALE METHOD IN LS-DYNA. Ian Do, LSTC Jim Day, LSTC

Effectiveness of Element Free Galerkin Method over FEM

Modeling the behavior of dry sand with DEM for improved impact prediction

Animation of air bubbles with SPH

A New Way for Multi-piece and Multi-hit Fragment Impact Simulation Using LS-DYNA

Applications of ICFD solver by LS-DYNA in Automotive Fields to Solve Fluid-Solid-Interaction (FSI) Problems

EFFECT OF PLY NUMBER & ORIENTATION OF COMPOSITE STRUCTURE IN BIRD STRIKE ANALYSIS

How to Handle Irregular Distribution of SPH Particles in Dynamic Fracture Analysis

Interactive Fluid Simulation using Augmented Reality Interface

Animation of Fluids. Animating Fluid is Hard

ALE and Fluid-Structure Interaction in LS-DYNA March 2004

Realtime Water Simulation on GPU. Nuttapong Chentanez NVIDIA Research

Alex Li 11/20/2009. Chris Wojtan, Nils Thurey, Markus Gross, Greg Turk

Simulating Underbelly Blast Events using Abaqus/Explicit - CEL

Divergence-Free Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics

Numerical study of composite structures subjected to slamming loads using Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH)

Necking and Failure Simulation of Lead Material Using ALE and Mesh Free Methods in LS-DYNA

Introduction to C omputational F luid Dynamics. D. Murrin

A 3D Virtual Earth Simulator for Earthquake Micro-physics: LSMearth.

Driven Cavity Example

Modeling Methodologies for Assessment of Aircraft Impact Damage to the World Trade Center Towers

APPLICATIONS OF NUMERICAL ANALYSIS IN SIMULATION ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGIES

CFD in COMSOL Multiphysics

Navier-Stokes & Flow Simulation

Using MSC.Nastran for Explicit FEM Simulations

Solving Partial Differential Equations on Overlapping Grids

A Coupled 3D/2D Axisymmetric Method for Simulating Magnetic Metal Forming Processes in LS-DYNA

Experimental Validation of the Computation Method for Strongly Nonlinear Wave-Body Interactions

Facundo DEL PIN / Iñaki ÇALDICHOURY / Rodrigo PAZ / / Livermore Software Technology Corporation

Parallelization study of a VOF/Navier-Stokes model for 3D unstructured staggered meshes

Robust Simulation of Sparsely Sampled Thin Features in SPH-Based Free Surface Flows

Modelling of Levitation Melting using a Fixed Mesh Method

Overview of Traditional Surface Tracking Methods

Fluent User Services Center

Transcription:

Thermal Coupling Method Between SPH Particles and Solid Elements in LS-DYNA Jingxiao Xu 1, Jason Wang 2 1 LSTC 2 LSTC 1 Abstract Smooth particles hydrodynamics is a meshfree, Lagrangian particle method and a simple, yet flexible method for modeling fluid flows and solid bodies in a robust way. It has been applied extensively to the multiphase flows, heat conduction, high explosive problems and so on. For the thermal coupling between any two parts in LS-DYNA, the standard way is through thermal contacts which require the contact areas between those two parts. Due to particle property, SPH particles can handle extremely large deformations, particles can be moved without limitation. In real engineering applications, SPH particles may have very complex free surface and material interface behaviors, including break-up into fragments, and new surfaces will be generated automatically every cycle when interacting with Solid elements. It is quite difficult to update new contact surfaces and calculate the true contact areas between SPH particles and Solid elements. In this paper we introduce a new thermal coupling method between SPH particles and Solid elements through keyword *DEFINE_ADAPTIVE_SOLID_TO_SPH with icpl=3 and iopt=0 options without using thermal contacts, the ghost SPH particles inside the solid elements are used as the coupling medium between original SPH particles and the Solid elements. Some examples are presented to show the robustness of the coupling method. 2 Introduction Heat transfer is very important in many industrial and geophysical problems. Many of the problems of geophysical and industrial fluid dynamics involve complex flows of multiple liquids and gases coupled with heat transfer. The motion of the surfaces of the liquids can involve sloshing, splashing and fragmentation. Thermal and chemical processes present further complications. The simulation of such systems can sometimes present difficulties for finite difference and finite element methods, particularly when coupled with complex free surface motion, while smoothed particle hydrodynamics can easily follow wave breaking, and it provides a reasonable simulation of splash on a length scale exceeding that where surface tension must be included. SPH is a Lagrangian method for solving partial differential equations. Essentially, the domain is discretized by approximating it by a series of roughly equi-spaced particles. They move and change their properties (such as temperature) in accordance with a set of ordinary differential equations derived from the original governing PDEs. Cleary and Monaghan (1995) extended the method to heat conduction and then to coupled heat and mass flows due to that SPH has a range of strong advantages in modeling industrial heat and mass flows: 1. The Lagrangian framework allows momentum dominated flows to be easily handled. 2. Complex free surface and material interface behavior, including break-up into fragments, can be modeled naturally. 3. Complicated physics such as multi-phase, realistic equations of state, compressibility, radiation, solidification and fracturing can be added with comparative ease. For the thermal coupling between any two parts in LS-DYNA, the standard way is through thermal contacts which require the contact areas between those two parts. Due to particle property, SPH particles can handle extremely large deformations, particles can be moved without limitation. In real engineering applications, SPH particles may have very complex free surface and material interface behaviors, including break-up into fragments, and new surfaces will be generated automatically every cycle when interacting with Solid elements. It is quite difficult to update new contact surfaces and calculate the true contact areas between SPH particles and Solid elements. Here we introduce a new thermal coupling method between SPH particles and Solid elements through keyword *DEFINE_ADAPTIVE_SOLID_TO_SPH with icpl=3 and iopt=0 options without using thermal contacts.

3 Keyword in LS-DYNA and Applications Keyword *DEFINE_ADAPTIVE_SOLID_TO_SPH is used to adaptively transform a Lagrangian solid Part or Part Set to SPH particles, when the Lagrangian solid elements comprising those parts fail (Shown in Fig 1), or used as hybrid elements to couple between original SPH parts and Solid parts. One or more SPH particles (elements) will be generated for each failed element. The SPH particles replacing the failed element inherit all of the properties of the failed solid element, e.g. mass, kinematic variables, and constitutive properties. Fig.1: Transform Solid elements into SPH particles With ICPL=0, this keyword is used for debris simulation, no coupling happens between newly generated SPH particles and solid elements, user need to define node to surface contact for the interaction between those two parts. When ICPL=1 and IOPT=1, the newly generated SPH particles are bonded with solid elements as one part through the coupling (Hybrid elements). With ICPL=1 and IOPT=0, this keyword is used as Hybrid Elements coupling SPH with Solid. Hybrid elements are used as transit layers between SPH particles and Solid elements, for a portion of grid model comprises SPH particles because the likelihood of enduring large deformation, while the rest of the model comprises FEM solid elements, hybrid elements are placed between the solids and the particles, each hybrid element comprises two layers: solid layer and particle layer. A new function was introduced into this keyword for the pure thermal coupling between SPH particles and Solid elements with ICPL=3 and IOPT=0. In this function hybrid elements were used, we have the SPH formulation and at the same time we have the Solid meshes which clearly describe the material interfaces. Solid elements constrain SPH nodal locations. SPH particles here provide real thermal coupling between original SPH parts and Solid element parts, also a coupling conductivity parameter between SPH part and Solid part was introduced here in the 8 th parameter of the keyword input *DEFINE_ADAPTIVE_SOLID_TO_SPH (as shown in Fig 4). 4 Examples 4.1 Case 1 A simple 3D pure thermal conduction example was tested here. For both SPH and Solid parts, initial temperature conditions were set to 0.0. On the surface nodes of the right side of the SPH part, a constant thermal BC was set (as shown in Fig 2). The thermal coupling between SPH and Solid part was applied through keyword *DEFINE_ADAPTIVE_SOLID_TO_SPH with icpl=3 and iopt=0. The default coupling conductivity between SPH and Solid parts was set (average value of the conductivities of two parts). Fig 3 shows the temperature results from the thermal conduction and the thermal coupling between SPH part and Solid part.

Fig.2: Initial set up for thermal coupling between SPH part and Solid part Fig.3: Temperature contour plot for thermal coupling between SPH part and Solid part

Coupling conductivity Fig.4: Hybrid element set up for thermal coupling between SPH part and Solid part 4.2 Case 2 A more complicated high velocity impact problem was tested in this case. A SPH part hit a thin Solid plate with very high initial speed. During the impacting process, SPH part endured very complex free surface and material interface behaviors, including break-up into fragments and new surfaces generation every cycle when interacting with Solid plate. For the structure behavior, a node to surface contact was used for the interaction between SPH part and Solid plate. The temperature of the SPH body changed due to the conversion of mechanical work into heat through plastic deformation. The process was fast enough such that there is no heat transfer with the environment. Thermal coupling between SPH part and Solid plate was applied through *DEFINE_ADAPTIVE_SOLID_TO_SPH (Fig 6 shows the hybrid elements setup for this coupling) with ICPL=3 and IOPT=0, the default coupling thermal conductivity was set for the thermal interaction between SPH part and Solid plate. Fig 5 shows the temperature contour plot during thermal coupling processing for HVI problem between SPH part and Solid plate. Fig.5: Temperature contour plot for HVI between Solid plate and SPH part with thermal coupling.

Fig.6: Hybrid element set up for HVI between SPH part and Solid plate with thermal coupling. 5 Summary and Future Works In this article, we introduce a new thermal coupling method between SPH particles and Solid elements through keyword *DEFINE_ADAPTIVE_SOLID_TO_SPH with icpl=3 and iopt=0 options without using thermal contacts. A more sophisticated coupling thermal conductivity model between SPH part and Solid part is needed for the further application of this keyword to the more complicated engeneering behaviors. 6 Literature [1] Jingxiao Xu, Jason Wang, Interaction methods for the SPH parts (Multiphase Flow, Solid Bodies) in LS-DYNA, 13 th International LS-DYNA Users conference, 2014. [2] Jingxiao Xu, Heat Transfer with Explicit SPH Method in LS-DYNA, 12 th International LS-DYNA Users conference, 2012. [3] Jingxiao Xu, Jason Wang, Node to node contacts for SPH applied to multiple fluids with large density ratio, 9th European LS-DYNA Conference 2013. [4] L.B. Lucy, A numerical approach to the testing of the fission hypothesis, Astron. J. 82 (12) (1977) 1013. [5] L.D. Cloutman, SPH simulations of hypervelocity impacts, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Rep. UCRL-ID-105520, 1991. [6] R.A. Gingold and J.J. Monaghan, Kernel estimates as a basis for general particle methods in hydrodynamics, J. Comput. Phys. 46 (1982) 429-453. [7] L.D. Libersky and A.G. Petschek, Smooth particle hydrodynamics with strength of materials, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM. [8] J.J. Monaghan, Simulating free surface flows with SPH, J. Comp. Phys. 110 (1994) 399-406. [9] Paul W. Cleary, Modelling confined multi-material heat and mass flows using SPH, Applied Mathematical Modelling, Volume 22, Issue 12, December 1998, Pages 981 993. [10] F. OTT and E. SCHNETTER, A modified SPH approach for fluids with large density differences, 2003. [11] X. Y. Hu and N. A. ADAMS, A multi-phase sph method for macroscopic and mesoscopic flows, Comput. Phys. 213, 2 (2006), 844-861. [12] B. Solenthaler and R. Pajarola, Density contrast SPH Interfaces, Eurographics/ACM SIGGRAPH symposium on Computer Animation, 2008. [13] Matthias Muller, Barbara Solenthaler, Richard Keiser and Markus Gross, Particle-Based Fluidfluid Interaction, Eurographics/ACM SIGGRAPH symposium on Computer Animation (2005), pp. 237-244. 1, 2, 4, 6.

[14] Markus Ihmsen, Julian Bader, Gizem Akinci and Mathias Teschner, Animation of air bubbles with SPH, International Conference on Computer Graphics Theory and Application, 2011. [15] P. A. Cundall and O. D. L. Strack, A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies (1979), Geotechnique, 29(1), 47-65.