High Dynamic Range Imaging

Similar documents
Sky-domain algorithms to reconstruct spatial, spectral and time-variable structure of the sky-brightness distribution

Radio Interferometry Bill Cotton, NRAO. Basic radio interferometry Emphasis on VLBI Imaging application

High dynamic range imaging, computing & I/O load

Image Pixelization and Dynamic Range

Imaging and Deconvolution

How accurately do our imaging algorithms reconstruct intensities and spectral indices of weak sources?

Wide-field Wide-band Full-Mueller Imaging

Imaging and Deconvolution

ERROR RECOGNITION and IMAGE ANALYSIS

CASA. Algorithms R&D. S. Bhatnagar. NRAO, Socorro

Empirical Parameterization of the Antenna Aperture Illumination Pattern

Fast Holographic Deconvolution

ALMA Memo 386 ALMA+ACA Simulation Tool J. Pety, F. Gueth, S. Guilloteau IRAM, Institut de Radio Astronomie Millimétrique 300 rue de la Piscine, F-3840

Wideband Mosaic Imaging for VLASS

Synthesis Imaging. Claire Chandler, Sanjay Bhatnagar NRAO/Socorro

Data Analysis. I have got some data, so what now? Naomi McClure-Griffiths CSIRO Australia Telescope National Facility 2 Oct 2008

Imaging and non-imaging analysis

Adaptive selfcalibration for Allen Telescope Array imaging

Primary Beams & Radio Interferometric Imaging Performance. O. Smirnov (Rhodes University & SKA South Africa)

OSKAR: Simulating data from the SKA

Lecture 17 Reprise: dirty beam, dirty image. Sensitivity Wide-band imaging Weighting

ADVANCED RADIO INTERFEROMETRIC IMAGING

Self-calibration: about the implementation in GILDAS. Vincent Piétu IRAM. IRAM millimeter interferometry summerschool

Basic Imaging and Self- Calibration (T4 + T7)

ERROR RECOGNITION & IMAGE ANALYSIS. Gustaaf van Moorsel (NRAO) Ed Fomalont (NRAO) Twelfth Synthesis Imaging Workshop 2010 June 8-15

Deconvolution and Imaging ASTR 240: In-class activity, April 1, 2013

OSKAR-2: Simulating data from the SKA

Continuum error recognition and error analysis

The Techniques of Radio Interferometry III: Imaging

EVLA Memo #132 Report on the findings of the CASA Terabyte Initiative: Single-node tests

Modeling Antenna Beams

Lessons learnt from implementing mosaicing and faceting in ASKAPsoft. Max Voronkov & Tim Cornwell ASKAP team 2nd April 2009

IRAM mm-interferometry School UV Plane Analysis. IRAM Grenoble

Correlator Field-of-View Shaping

ASKAP Pipeline processing and simulations. Dr Matthew Whiting ASKAP Computing, CSIRO May 5th, 2010

What might astronomers want? Flexible data products and remotely-steered pipelines

Wide field polarization calibration in the image plane using the Allen Telescope Array

Visualization & the CASA Viewer

Controlling Field-of-View of Radio Arrays using Weighting Functions

Pre-Processing and Calibration for Million Source Shallow Survey

Imaging and Deconvolution

ALMA SIMULATIONS WITH CASA. Hsi-An Pan & ARC Taiwan Team

GBT Commissioning Memo 11: Plate Scale and pointing effects of subreflector positioning at 2 GHz.

Imaging Strategies and Postprocessing Computing Costs for Large-N SKA Designs

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.im] 21 Jun 2017

Radio interferometric imaging of spatial structure that varies with time and frequency

Synthesis imaging using CASA

Using CASA to Simulate Interferometer Observations

COMMENTS ON ARRAY CONFIGURATIONS. M.C.H. Wright. Radio Astronomy laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA, ABSTRACT

IRAM Memo MAPPING for NOEMA: Concepts and Usage

Using CASA to Simulate Interferometer Observations

NRAO VLA Archive Survey

POSSUM: analysis for early science and beyond

PSRCHIVE is: Introduction to PSRCHIVE. IPTA 2015 Student Workshop. PSRCHIVE can: PSRCHIVE cannot: Use PSRCHIVE to. PSRCHIVE Core Applications 7/21/15

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.im] 15 Jan 2019

MWA Real-Time Subsystem

Imaging and Deconvolution

The Virtual Observatory in Australia Connecting to International Initiatives. Peter Lamb. CSIRO Mathematical & Information Sciences

CoE4TN4 Image Processing. Chapter 5 Image Restoration and Reconstruction

ALMA Antenna responses in CASA imaging

John W. Romein. Netherlands Institute for Radio Astronomy (ASTRON) Dwingeloo, the Netherlands

Data Compression for HERA

Spherical Geometry Selection Used for Error Evaluation

Computational issues for HI

A Modified Algorithm for CLEANing Wide-Field Maps with Extended Structures

Fourier Transform and Texture Filtering

Edge and local feature detection - 2. Importance of edge detection in computer vision

IRAM Memo Introducing Associated Arrays in CLASS

IRAM-30m HERA time/sensitivity estimator

Advanced Jitter Analysis with Real-Time Oscilloscopes

Long Term Analysis for the BAM device Donata Bonino and Daniele Gardiol INAF Osservatorio Astronomico di Torino

SCALE INVARIANT FEATURE TRANSFORM (SIFT)

The Programmable Telescope

Illumination for the microscope

Imaging Supermassive Black Holes with the Event Horizon Telescope

Optimization Results for Consistent Steady-State Plasma Solution

SIGNAL PROCESSING ADVANCEMENTS FOR CASS UT EXAMINATIONS. T. Seuaciuc-Osório, M. Dennis, D. MacDonald, EPRI, USA D. Braconnier, D.B. Ltd.

EVLA memo 77. EVLA and SKA computing costs for wide field imaging. (Revised) 1. T.J. Cornwell, NRAO 2

OSKAR Settings Files Revision: 8

European VLBI Network

LOFAR UV-DATA PROCESSING TUTORIAL

Polarization SYS#224, 225. Hiroshi Nagai (NAOJ) With the help by K. Nakanishi (JAO/NAOJ), Y.-W. Tang (ASIAA), E. Chapillon (ASIAA -> French ARC-node)

Michael Moody School of Pharmacy University of London 29/39 Brunswick Square London WC1N 1AX, U.K.

Signal processing with heterogeneous digital filterbanks: lessons from the MWA and EDA

EVLA Memo #133 Parallelization of the off-line data processing operations using CASA

Introduction to CASA

Waves & Oscillations

MaNGA Technical Note Finding Fiber Bundles in an Image

Data reduction of International LOFAR observations in AIPS

Lecture 39: Mueller Calculus and Optical Activity Physical Optics II (Optical Sciences 330) (Updated: Friday, April 29, 2005, 8:29 PM) W.J.

GEOG 4110/5100 Advanced Remote Sensing Lecture 2

FieldFox N9923A RF Vector Network Analyzer

Status of PSF Reconstruction at Lick

S.A. Torchinsky, A. van Ardenne, T. van den Brink-Havinga, A.J.J. van Es, A.J. Faulkner (eds.) 4-6 November 2009, Château de Limelette, Belgium

Appendix E. Development of methodologies for Brightness Temperature evaluation for the MetOp-SG MWI radiometer. Alberto Franzoso (CGS, Italy)

Robot vision review. Martin Jagersand

Implementing the Scale Invariant Feature Transform(SIFT) Method

IB-2 Polarization Practice

Computer Vision 2. SS 18 Dr. Benjamin Guthier Professur für Bildverarbeitung. Computer Vision 2 Dr. Benjamin Guthier

Outline 7/2/201011/6/

Transcription:

High Dynamic Range Imaging Josh Marvil CASS Radio Astronomy School 3 October 2014 CSIRO ASTRONOMY & SPACE SCIENCE

High Dynamic Range Imaging Introduction Review of Clean Self- Calibration Direction Dependence Other Advanced Techniques

An image s dynamic range is the ratio of the peak brightness to the noise floor Image by R. Perley

An image s dynamic range is the ratio of the peak brightness to the noise floor Image by R. Perley

Requirements for high dynamic range: Bright sources in the field of view Your target is bright Bright source(s) near your target Your data are part of a survey

Requirements for high dynamic range: Low noise Sensitive instrument Large bandwidth Long integration time Sensitivity Equation Confusion Limit

Let s design the ultimate high dynamic range image 10 Jy point source 1 ujy thermal noise Avoid confusion limit Reach DR of 10 Million to One What could go wrong?

Image artifacts around bright sources limit dynamic range Achieving high dynamic range requires advanced calibration and proper imaging Standard Calibration: Self- Calibration: Advanced Calibration: 10 3 10 4 ~5 10 5 ~6+ Image by R. Perley

High Dynamic Range Imaging Introduction Review of Clean Self- Calibration Direction Dependence Other Advanced Techniques

Review of the clean algorithm Dirty Image Dirty Beam Model Image

Review of the clean algorithm Dirty Image Dirty Beam Model Image Find the brightest peak

Review of the clean algorithm Dirty Image Dirty Beam Model Image Find the brightest peak Subtract the dirty beam

Review of the clean algorithm Dirty Image (Residual) Find the brightest peak Dirty Beam Subtract the dirty beam Model Image Add component to model

Review of the clean algorithm Dirty Image (Residual) Find the brightest peak Dirty Beam Subtract the dirty beam Model Image Add component to model

Review of the clean algorithm Residual Image + Model Image Clean Beam = Restored Image

Best case: Residual image is noise- like with a Gaussian distribution Typical case: Residual image has substantial non- Gaussian structures Sources of image errors: Refer to previous talks Especially Emil s talk on Error Recognition

High Dynamic Range Imaging Introduction Review of Clean Self- Calibration Direction Dependence Other Advanced Techniques

Self- calibration is just like regular calibration Use source s visibilities and model image (from clean) to solve for antenna- based gains Works because complex gains are factored into O(N) antenna- based quantities using N(N- 1)/2 baseline- based quantities Requires adequate signal- to- noise and decent model image

Self- calibration recipe 1. Solve and apply standard (external) calibration 2. Split and clean the target field 3. Solve for gain corrections using the clean model 4. Apply corrections, split, re- image 5. Solve for new gain corrections using the new clean model 6. Apply new corrections, split, re- image 7. Iterate

Self- calibration recipe (a variant) 1. Solve and apply standard (external) calibration 2. Split and clean the target field 3. Solve for gain corrections using the clean model 4. Apply corrections, split, re- image 5. Return to step (3) but use model image from step (4) 6. Iterate

Self- calibration tips Inspect the gain solutions for coherence Apply phase- only corrections during initial iterations Try including amplitude corrections in final iteration Experiment with different averaging: time, freq, pol Peak fluxes should increase and image RMS decrease

Self- calibration- example results Original 1 st phase cal Images by C. Brogan

Self- calibration- example results Original 3 iterations Images by M. Bietenholz

Self- calibration- example results Good coherence

Self- calibration- example results Higher order solutions

High Dynamic Range Imaging Introduction Review of Clean Self- Calibration Direction Dependence Other Advanced Techniques

Direction- dependent imaging errors Errors are larger for bright sources further from the image center Image by R. Perley

Effect of the rotating primary beam pattern Time varying gain Images by S. Bhatnagar

A- Projection Algorithm Incorporates the primary beam convolution function into the imaging algorithm Accounts for rotation of (asymmetric) beam on the sky Some implementations are available but not fully integrated with other imaging algorithms (eg. wideband)

Pointing Self- calibration Solves for antenna, time based primary beam translation Not yet implemented in common data reduction packages EVLA Memo #84

Peeling Works like self- cal but on one source at a time Does not discriminate between sources of errors Can be tedious to run on more than a couple sources

Peeling Recipe Model and UV- subtract all but one bright source Images by T. Oosterloo subtract central sources only off-axis source left

Peeling Recipe Self- calibrate and apply solutions subtract central sources only off-axis source left Images by T. Oosterloo

Peeling Recipe Apply solutions to previous data, subtract far- field source, undo gain corrections Images by T. Oosterloo

High Dynamic Range Imaging Introduction Review of Clean Self- Calibration Direction Dependence Other Advanced Techniques

Baseline- based Calibration Visibilites are corrupted by closure errors (C ij ) ij V G G * ij i j (1 C )S -based gain is separated into an a ij ij O Closure errors are multiplicative (larger error around brighter sources) Closure errors do not factor out into antenna- based gains ij n ij

Recipe for BL Calibration Solve for baseline- based amplitude and phase Use a bright calibrator field and a very good model Divide the visibilities by the FT of the model Average the remainder in time

Polarization Calibration Flux of polarized sources can leak into Stokes I image Flux of unpolarized sources can leak into Stokes I image Off- axis unpolarized sources can appear polarized by the primary beam response and leak into Stokes I image

Full Direction- Dependent Jones Matrix Calibration Solutions can address many effects without separating them by origin (eg. antenna pointing, pol leakage) Can solve for calibration simultaneously and independently in multiple directions Implemented in the MeqTrees package This approach is essential for reaching the highest dynamic ranges

Full Direction- Dependent Jones Matrix Calibration 3.2 Million Dynamic Range Current world record Calibrated with MeqTrees Image by R. Perley and O. Smirnov

Summary Self calibration is not scary Advanced methods are available New algorithms are being developed Only go as far as required by your science 41 Presentation title Presenter name