Linear and Nonlinear Analysis of a Cantilever Beam

Similar documents
Multi-Step Analysis of a Cantilever Beam

Sliding Block LESSON 26. Objectives: Demonstrate the use of Contact LBCs in a simple exercise.

Post-Buckling Analysis of a Thin Plate

Linear Bifurcation Buckling Analysis of Thin Plate

Transient Response of a Rocket

Introduction to MSC.Patran

Helical Spring. Supplementary Exercise - 6. Objective: Develop model of a helical spring

Stiffened Plate With Pressure Loading

Heat Transfer Analysis of a Pipe

Sliding Split Tube Telescope

Modeling a Shell to a Solid Element Transition

Spatial Variation of Physical Properties

Spatial Variation of Physical Properties

Using Groups and Lists

The Essence of Result Post- Processing

Materials, Load Cases and LBC Assignment

Normal Modes - Rigid Element Analysis with RBE2 and CONM2

Linear Static Analysis of a Spring Element (CELAS)

Normal Modes - Rigid Element Analysis with RBE2 and CONM2

Rigid Element Analysis with RBAR

Modal Analysis of a Beam (SI Units)

Mass Properties Calculations

Elasto-Plastic Deformation of a Thin Plate

Normal Modes - Rigid Element Analysis with RBE2 and CONM2

Load Lug Model EXERCISE 6. Objective: Write a function to apply the loads and element properties to the finite element mesh of the lug.

Cylinder with T-Beam Stiffeners

Post Processing of Displacement Results

Load Analysis of a Beam (using a point force and moment)

Finite Element Model

Post-Processing Modal Results of a Space Satellite

MSC/PATRAN LAMINATE MODELER COURSE PAT 325 Workbook

Merging Databases LESSON 2. Objectives: Construct two databases which have distinct similarities and differences.

Elastic Stability of a Plate

APPENDIX B. PBEAML Exercise. MSC.Nastran 105 Exercise Workbook B-1

Linear Static Analysis of a Simply-Supported Truss

Post Processing of Displacement Results

Engine Gasket Model Instructions

Importing a PATRAN 2.5 Model into P3

ME 442. Marc/Mentat-2011 Tutorial-1

Projected Coordinate Systems

Post-Processing Static Results of a Space Satellite

Nonlinear Creep Analysis

Exercise 1. 3-Point Bending Using the GUI and the Bottom-up-Method

CE366/ME380 Finite Elements in Applied Mechanics I Fall 2007

Post Processing of Stress Results

Post Processing of Stress Results With Results

Projected Coordinate Systems

Linear Static Analysis of a Simply-Supported Truss

Modal Analysis of a Flat Plate

Building the Finite Element Model of a Space Satellite

Appendix B: Creating and Analyzing a Simple Model in Abaqus/CAE

Building the Finite Element Model of a Space Satellite

Verification and Property Assignment

NonLinear Analysis of a Cantilever Beam

FEMAP Tutorial 2. Figure 1: Bar with defined dimensions

Shell-to-Solid Element Connector(RSSCON)

ME Optimization of a Frame

Visit the following websites to learn more about this book:

Post-Processing of Time-Dependent Results

PATRAN/ABAQUS PRACTICE

SETTLEMENT OF A CIRCULAR FOOTING ON SAND

Abaqus CAE Tutorial 1: 2D Plane Truss

A pipe bend is subjected to a concentrated force as shown: y All dimensions in inches. Material is stainless steel.

Linear Static Analysis for a 3-D Slideline Contact

Recent Advances on Higher Order 27-node Hexahedral Element in LS-DYNA

Analysis Steps 1. Start Abaqus and choose to create a new model database

CHAPTER 4. Numerical Models. descriptions of the boundary conditions, element types, validation, and the force

Rigid Element Analysis with RBE2 and CONM2

Figure E3-1 A plane struss structure under applied loading. Start MARC Designer. From the main menu, select STATIC STRESS ANALYSIS.

ANSYS 5.6 Tutorials Lecture # 2 - Static Structural Analysis

Linear Static Analysis of a Simply-Supported Stiffened Plate

Analysis of a Tension Coupon

Linear Buckling Load Analysis (without spring)

Analysis of a Tension Coupon

Post Processing of Results

FB-MULTIPIER vs ADINA VALIDATION MODELING

Torsional-lateral buckling large displacement analysis with a simple beam using Abaqus 6.10

Creating and Analyzing a Simple Model in Abaqus/CAE

Exercise 1. 3-Point Bending Using the Static Structural Module of. Ansys Workbench 14.0

Imported Geometry Cleaning

Geometric Linear Analysis of a Cantilever Beam

Finite Element Analysis Using NEi Nastran

Abaqus CAE Tutorial 6: Contact Problem

Aufgabe 1: Dreipunktbiegung mit ANSYS Workbench

Elasto-Plastic Deformation of a Truss Structure

Exercise 1: 3-Pt Bending using ANSYS Workbench

FEA TUTORIAL 2D STRESS ANALYSIS OF A THIN BAR (Using ProMechanica Wildfire 1.0)

Normal Modes with Differential Stiffness

Modelling Flat Spring Performance Using FEA

Abaqus/CAE (ver. 6.12) Vibrations Tutorial

Shear and Moment Reactions - Linear Static Analysis with RBE3

Two Dimensional Truss

ECE421: Electronics for Instrumentation

ME 475 FEA of a Composite Panel

Loads and Boundary Conditions on a 3-D Clevis

Abaqus/CAE Axisymmetric Tutorial (Version 2016)

Exercise 2: Mesh Resolution, Element Shapes, Basis Functions & Convergence Analyses

Construct Hybrid Microcircuit Geometry

A Quadratic Pipe Element in LS-DYNA

Example 24 Spring-back

Transcription:

LESSON 1 Linear and Nonlinear Analysis of a Cantilever Beam P L Objectives: Create a beam database to be used for the specified subsequent exercises. Compare small vs. large displacement analysis. Linear elastic theory. 1-1

1-2

LESSON 1 Linear and Nonlinear Analysis of Beam Model Description: In this exercise, a cantilever beam is subjected to a static load. The beam is initially analyzed using small deformation theory. However, after reviewing the results, it becomes apparent that small deformation theory is not appropriate for this problem. Subsequently, a large deformation analysis is performed and its results are compared to the small deformation analysis. The model built in Lesson 1 will be used for this analysis. The model is made using eight, 2D plane stress, incompatible mode elements. The elements are uniformly spaced along the length of the beam (i.e. a mesh eight elements wide and one element deep). The incompatible mode type element is designed specifically for in-plane bending and is well suited for this problem. P A L A Data for basic case: a L = 100.0 in (2.54m) a = 1.0 in (25.4mm) b = 2.0 in (50.8mm) Linear elastic Young s modulus=30.0 x 10 6 lb/in 2 (207 GPa) Poisson s ratio =0.3 P = 6000 lb (27200 N) b Section A-A 1-3

Exercise Procedure: 1. Open a new database. Name it cantilever_beam File/New... New Database Name: cantilever_beam The viewport (PATRAN s graphics window) will appear along with a New Model Preference form. The New Model Preference sets all the code specific forms and options inside MSC/PATRAN. In the New Model Preference form set the Analysis Code to MSC.Marc. Tolerance: Analysis Code: Analysis Type: Based on Model MSC.Marc Structural 2. Create the model geometry. Geometry Action: Create Object: Surface Method: XYZ Vector Coordinate List: <100, 2, 0> The surface in Figure 1.1 will appear in your viewport. 1-4

LESSON 1 Linear and Nonlinear Analysis of Beam Figure 1.1 - Surface for the Cantilever Beam Y Z X 3. Create the finite element mesh. Elements Action: Create Object: Mesh Seed Type: Uniform Number: 8 Click in the Curve List databox and screen select the bottom edge of the surface. Curve List: pick bottom edge (see Figure 1.2) 1-5

Figure 1.2 - Mesh Seed Location Left Edge (Surface 1.1) Bottom Edge (Surface 1.4) Y Z X Now create a mesh seed for the left edge of the beam Number: 1 Curve List: pick left edge (see Figure 1.2) 4. Create the model s finite element mesh. On the Finite Element form change: Action: Create Object: Mesh Type: Surface Element Topology: Quad 4 Surface List: Surface 1 1-6

LESSON 1 Linear and Nonlinear Analysis of Beam 5. Now create the material and element properties for the beam. The beam is made of a Linear Elastic material with Young s modulus of 30.0E6 lb/in 2, with a Poisson s ratio of 0.3 and a mass density of 0.00074. Materials Action: Create Object: Isotropic Method: Manual Input Material Name: Input Properties... Constitutive Model: steel Elastic Elastic Modulus: 30.0E6 Poisson s Ratio: 0.3 Density: 0.00074 6. Input the properties of the Cantilever Beam under Properties. The beam will be assigned an incompatible modes element formulation. These elements are designed for conditions where bending is the predominate loading. Properties Action: Create Dimension: 2D Type: 2D Solid Property Set Name: Options: Input Properties... beam Plane Stress Standard Formulation 1-7

Formulation Options: Material Name: 7. Now apply the loads and boundary conditions. The left end of the beam is fixed in all active degrees of freedom. Figure 1.3 - Fixed end of beam Assumed Strain steel Thickness: 1.0 Select Members: Surface 1 Add Loads/BCs Action: Create Object: Displacement Type: Nodal New Set Name: Input Data... fixed Translations: <0, 0 > Select Application Region... Geometry Filter: Geometry Select Geometric Entities: see Figure 1.3 Select points 1:2 Add 1-8

LESSON 1 Linear and Nonlinear Analysis of Beam 8. Create Groups, which will contain all the entities comprising the cantilever beam. Group/Create... New Group Name: Make Current (OFF) Posted Unpost All Other Groups Group Contents: cantilever_beam Add Entity Selection Entity Selection: Point 1:4 Surface 1 Node 1:18 Elm 1:8 Now create two other groups with nothing in them for now. New Group Name: Entity Selection: Cancel rigid_body1 (leave this box empty) 9. Create the interference Geometry Place a semicircular arc at the mid-span of the beam just below it a few inches. Geometry Action: Create Object: Curve Method: 2D ArcAngles Radius: 10 Start Angle: 0.0 End Angle: 180 Construction Plane List: Coord 0.3 1-9

Center Point List: [50, -15, 0] 10. Now place the two geometric arcs you just created into the groups created previously. Group/Modify... Change Target Group... Existing Groups: rigid_body1 Cancel Member List to Add/Remove: Curve 1 Add 11. Close the Database. You have now completed the foundation database for the cantilever beam problems. Do not delete the database, since you will be using it for a few of the following exercises. File / Close Note: You may want to make a backup of this database, cantilever_beam.db. 12. Open a new database named tip_load.db File/New... New Database Name: Tolerance: Analysis Code: Analysis Type: tip_load Based on Model MSC.Marc Structural 1-10

LESSON 1 Linear and Nonlinear Analysis of Beam 13. Import the old database. Use the cantilever beam model from the first part of this exercise. File/Import... Object: Source: Import File: Model MSC.Patran DB cantilever_beam This will be the old database just created. Close the summary form by selecting. 14. Now graphically display only the cantilever beam. Group/Post... Selected Groups to Post: Cancel cantilever_beam Note: You should always be aware of which is the current group. It is always listed in the header of the graphics screen after the database name and the viewport name. 15. Next, you will create the point load that totals 6000 lbs at the end of the beam. Loads/BCs Action: Create Object: Force Type: Nodal New Set Name: Input Data... tip_load 1-11

Force: <0, -3000 > Select Application Region... Geometry Filter: Geometry Select Points: see Figure 1.4 Figure 1.4 - Free end of beam Select points 3:4 12 12 Add Your model should now look like the picture shown in Figure 1.5: Figure 1.5 - Beam with applied Loads/BCs 3000. 3000. 12 12 1 16. Your model is now ready for analysis. You will be using the Default Static Step to perform this analysis. The default static step is an analysis step which runs a Linear Static solution on the corresponding Default load case. Analysis Action: Analyze Object: Entire Model Method: Full Run Job Name: linear 1-12

LESSON 1 Linear and Nonlinear Analysis of Beam Load Step Creation... Solution Parameters... Linearity: Linear Yes Select Yes when asked to overwrite. Cancel 17. When the analysis job is finished read the results back into PATRAN. Analysis Action: Read Results Object: Result Entities Method: Attach Available Jobs: Select Results File... linear linear.t16 18. We will now use MSC/PATRAN to post process the results of the linear static analysis. Results Action: Create Object: Quick Plot Select Results Case: Select Fringe Result: Default, A1:Incr=1, Time=0 Displacement, Translation 1-13

Select Deformation Result: Displacement, Translation 19. This will plot a true-scaled version of the real deformation. Finally, to see the whole plot, click on the Zoom out icon from the toolbar. Zoom Out Your model should appear as shown in Figure 1.6: Figure 1.6 - Beam Deformation (actual) 20. To plot a scaled version of the real deformation set the scaling factor by clicking on the Deformation Attributes icon: 1-14

LESSON 1 Linear and Nonlinear Analysis of Beam Model Scale Scale Factor: 0.1 Finally, to see the whole plot, click on the Fit View icon from the toolbar. Your screen will appear as shown in Figure 1.7: Figure 1.7 - Beam Deformation (scaled) 1-15

Linear beam theory predicts the maximum beam deflection in the Y- direction and stress to be: ( PL 3 ) U max = ------------- 3EI or 4PL 3 ----------------- E ab 3 where b = 2 and a = 1 6, 000 ( 100) 3 4 U max = ----------------------------------------------- 6 30 10 ( 1) ( 2) 3 = 100 M max b σ max = --------------------- I ------------ 6PL ab ( ) 2 6 6, 000 100 σ max = -------------------------------------- 1 ( 2) 2 = 900,000 The maximum Y deflection of the beam can be taken directly off of the displayed spectrum/range. The largest value should correspond to a magnitude of 99.64, which is in very close agreement with our hand calculation of 100. Linear beam theory assumes plane section remain plane and the deflection is small relative to length of the beam. As can be clearly seen by this analysis, the deflection is very large and this analysis is in violation of the underlying assumptions used for linear beam theory. These results match the linear hand calculations and also show that the small deformation assumption is not valid and therefore, a non-linear, large deformation analysis needs to be performed. In large deformation analysis, the bending and axial stiffness are coupled. Thus, as the cantilever beam deflects, a portion of the load P puts the beam in tension which tends to stiffen the beam in bending (i.e. geometric stiffness ). Thus, one would expect to see a much smaller deformation in the large deformation analysis as compared to the small deformation analysis. To set up a large deformation analysis, one needs to change the analysis set-up and re-submit the job to MSC.Marc. 1-16

LESSON 1 Linear and Nonlinear Analysis of Beam Part 2 - NonLinear Analysis 21. Now set up a Large Displacement Analysis by creating a nonlinear static step. You will use the same default load case and use the default solution parameters and output for the nonlinear static solution. Analysis Action: Analyze Object: Entire Model Method: Full Run Job Name: Load Step Creation... Job Step Name: Solution Parameters... nonlinear Linearity: NonLinear nonlinear elastic analysis Nonlinear Geometric Effects: Large Displ.(Updated Lagr.)/Small Strains Cancel Load Step Selection... Select nonlinear elastic analysis from the Existing Job Steps listbox. Deselect the Default Static Step step by clicking on it once in the Selected Job Steps listbox. After the job starts to run, MSC.Marc creates several files that can be used to monitor the job and verify that the analysis has run correctly. One file is nonlinear.log. This ASCII file contains Element, Loads & Boundary Conditions, Material Translation, Step Control parameters, Equilibrium and Error information. When the job completes, this file 1-17

contains an Analysis Summary which summarizes the error and iteration information. Another useful ASCII file is the nonlinear.sts file. This file contains a summary of job information; including step number, number of increments, number of iterations, total time of step, and time of a given increment. Also, the nonlinear.out file contains a summary of any job errors. These files can be viewed during or after a job has completed. A more convenient method might be to use the Analysis application, Monitor. Action: Monitor Object: Job View Status File... After the job has finished, a successful completion will result with: Job ends with exit number: 3004 22. Read in the results of the analysis Analysis Action: Read Results Object: Result Entities Method: Attach Available Jobs: Select Results File... nonlinear nonlinear.t16 23. Now we will post process the nonlinear analysis and compare these results to the linear static analysis. Results Action: Create Object: Quick Plot Select Result Case: Select Fringe Result: Quantity: Nonlinear..., A2:..., Time=1 Displacement, Translation Y Component 1-18

LESSON 1 Linear and Nonlinear Analysis of Beam Select Deformation Result: Displacement, Translation As a final step, get the maximum Y deflection from the fringe spectrum/range. Enter that value into the table below. Another interesting post-processing technique is to create an animation by selecting the Animate Results Icon in the Results form. Table 1: Small Deflection Large Deflection MSC.Marc Theory -100.0 ------ As shown in the results obtained, inclusion of large deformation effects are very important in realistically modeling the physical behavior of the cantilever model. 24. Quit out of MSC/PATRAN Close the database and quit PATRAN. This concludes the exercise File/Close File/Quit Small Deflection Large Deflection MSC.Marc -95.5-57.3 Theory -100.0 ------ ANSWERS: 1-19

1-20