McLean BASIS plus TM. Sample Hospital. Report for April thru June 2012 BASIS-24 APR-JUN. McLean Hospital

Similar documents
3. EXCEL FORMULAS & TABLES

2017 PIT Summary: Jefferson County

Excel Functions & Tables

2017 PIT Summary: Boulder County

Statistical Methods in Trending. Ron Spivey RETIRED Associate Director Global Complaints Tending Alcon Laboratories

MHealth - The Future of Mental Health Care

Bergen County Housing, Health and Human Services Center 120 South River Street, Hackensack, NJ 07601

INSPIRE. User Screen Guide: MST, Administrative

ADVANCED SPREADSHEET APPLICATIONS (07)

Netsmart Sandbox Tour Guide Script

ICT PROFESSIONAL MICROSOFT OFFICE SCHEDULE MIDRAND

San Joaquin County Emergency Medical Services Agency

Welcome To The. Broward County Human Services Department. Community Partnerships Division FY2016 Provider Information Workshop

Vision Services Application Overview

IT Specialist, Associate of Applied Science Outcomes Assessment Implementation Summary. Academic Year

Haringey CCG Performance and Quality Dash Board January 2015

October Broward County Government Human Services Department. Community Partnerships Division FY2015 Provider Information

Topline Questionnaire

New Beginnings Long-Term Treatment Program

4. ENCOUNTER DATA PROCESSING PROCEDURES A. General Information

Catalyst Views. 1. Open your web browser and type in the URL address line:

TRAINING WORKBOOK Pilot Session 2

NMOSE GPCD CALCULATOR

(26) Disposition Program Referred to **Must complete 26 if 24 is: SCMH Adult Clinic, SCMH Youth Clinic, Adult Contractor or Youth Contractor

Medicaid: Beyond the Silos Series Health and Housing Integration August 7, Arizona Environment

Admission Application: Intensive Residential Rehabilitation / Community Residence / Supportive Living COVER PAGE

Registering and submitting data for multiple healthcare organizations... 4

HEALTH COVERAGE ENROLLMENT REPORT

Certified Peer Recovery Mentor

PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATES AND SHORT COURSES: MICROSOFT OFFICE. PCS.uah.edu/PDSolutions

Full Clinical Psychotherapist

HEALTH COVERAGE ENROLLMENT REPORT

SAMPLE Treatment Perceptions Survey (TPS) Report. XXXXXX County, N=239. (Not Real Data) All Substance Use Treatment Programs Surveyed.

Comprehend Pro v.1 User s Manual

REPORT ON TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE QUALITY WINDSTREAM FLORIDA, INC.

includes the archived video and post test.

375 SMITH STREET 384 SMITH STREET. TEL: 0860 CALL DCC ( ) FAX: (031) AGREEMENT BETWEEN

June 2012 First Data PCI RAPID COMPLY SM Solution

A D D E N D U M # 2 August 24, 2016

San Francisco Housing Authority (SFHA) Leased Housing Programs October 2015

Contents:

Vine Medical Group Patient Registration Form Your Information

UNIVERSITY OF BAHRAIN COLLEGE OF APPLIED STUDIES STATA231 LAB 4. Creating A boxplot Or whisker diagram

Application Procedures for Additional Endorsement to a Michigan Teaching Certificate and/or Standard Career & Technical Education (CTE) Certificate

September Real Sector Statistics Division. Methodology

Lecture 10: Boolean Expressions

Essentials. Week by. Week. All About Data. Algebra Alley

Commission on Paraoptometric Certification Year in Review

Routing the Internet in Geoff Huston APNIC March 2007

2

Student Information System User Guide

Council, 26 March Information Technology Report. Executive summary and recommendations. Introduction

Undergraduate Admission File

2

2

MI LAST NAME DATE OF BIRTH GENDER ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CODE MI LAST NAME DATE OF BIRTH GENDER

Ready for Kindergarten Online:

Undergraduate Research Internship in Science & Engineering URISE at Berkeley Summer Application Form. Name: Address: Street City State Zip

Metro Transit Police Update

Chapter 4 - Demographic Data Set (DEMO) Table of Contents. I. Document Revision History 2 II. General Policies and Considerations 3

C4Yourself External User Guide. External Page User Guide

Cyber Defense 2019 Summer Application

Grade 4 Mathematics Pacing Guide

Yawkey Scholars Program for Massachusetts Residents

software.sci.utah.edu (Select Visitors)

The New England Approach to HIPAA. John D. Halamka MD Chairman, New England Health EDI Network CIO, CareGroup Healthcare System

ICD-10 Compliance Project November 2013 update

CLINTON COUNSELING CENTER STUDENT SOCIAL MEDICAL QUESTIONNAIRE

Civil Service Affirmative Action Executive Summary Report. Office of Diversity, Equity, and Access

New Jersey Department of Children and Families Focusing on the Fundamentals Annual Update

Domestic Violence Client Intake Form

Getting in Gear with the Service Catalog

Netsmart Sandbox Tour Guide Script

SkilMatch documentation for adding, changing and deleting Affordable Care Act (ACA) Tracking Codes (TCs) for employees (EEs). Command "ACADATUPD".

Freedom of Information Act 2000 reference number RFI

The City of Seattle s Mandatory Benchmarking and Disclosure Program

Application For Employment (Apprenticeship Application Form)

Thank you for completing this process. Please visit to learn more about our charitable outreach efforts.

Inter-Domain Routing Trends

2013 Local Arts Agency Salary & Benefits Summary EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR / PRESIDENT / CEO

November 2016 G. Oscar Anderson, Senior Research Advisor AARP Research

Admission, Discharge, Update Client Data and Associated Forms

Netsmart Sandbox Tour Guide Script

Library. Summary Report

Lessons from Haiti: Innovation in Tracking and Housing Internally Displaced Persons

New Concept for Article 36 Networking and Management of the List

Enroll-HD Data Handling Manual

This report is based on sampled data. Jun 1 Jul 6 Aug 10 Sep 14 Oct 19 Nov 23 Dec 28 Feb 1 Mar 8 Apr 12 May 17 Ju

HIGH RISK REPORT J.CREW GROUP, INC. September 14, 2017

Characterization and Modeling of Deleted Questions on Stack Overflow

Compliance Enforcement Initiative

Automatic Renewal Using DIY Technology to Create an Improved Patron Experience

HIPAA Case Study. Long Term Care (LTC) Industry. October 26, Presented by: James Pfeiffer Brian Zoeller

Interim Report Technical Support for Integrated Library Systems Comparison of Open Source and Proprietary Software

CIMA Asia. Interactive Timetable Live Online

10th Maintenance Cost Conference Chairman s Report Athens Sept 10& Tiymor Kalimat Manager Technical Procurement Royal Jordanian Airlines

INSPIRE. User Screen Guide: MST, Clinical

GALLUP NEWS SERVICE GALLUP POLL SOCIAL SERIES: VALUES AND BELIEFS

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA FOR RADIOGRAPHER PROGRAM. To determine whether the identified outcomes are being met, the Program will assess its effectiveness.

CIMA Asia. Interactive Timetable Live Online

Transcription:

APR-JUN 212 McLean BASIS plus TM Sample Hospital Report for April thru June 212 BASIS-24 McLean Hospital 115 Mill Street Belmont, MA 2478 Department of Mental Health Services Evaluation Tel: 617-855-2424 Fax: 617-855-2948 Website: www.ebasis.org Email: basisadmin@mclean.harvard.edu

BASIS-24: IP : Sample Hospital, April 212 to June 212 (LoC : In Patient) 1

BASIS-24 The BASIS-24 is a twenty-four item patient self-report questionnaire designed to assess treatment outcomes by measuring symptoms and functional difficulties experienced by consumers seeking mental health services. The BASIS-24 is administered at the beginning of a treatment episode, with repeat assessments obtained at desired intervals to assess change during or following treatment. All items are answered on a 5-point scale with different sets of response options tailored to particular sets of questions. Scores are computed for the overall BASIS-24, as well as for six domains: Depression and Functioning, Interpersonal Relationships, Psychosis, Substance Abuse, Emotional Lability, and Self-harm. Clinical and Organizational Applications The BASIS-24 allows you to evaluate clinical and program effectiveness from the patient perspective with the statistical accuracy necessary today. Results can be used to meet accreditation requirements, satisfy insurers and other payers, and most importantly deliver high quality behavioral health care to the community you serve. Program Comparison and Assessment Aggregate results are useful for comparing programs and tracking changes in outcomes over time. Program Planning Baseline assessment can help guide program planning by informing administrators and clinical leaders about the kinds of symptoms and problems presented by patients; this can also guide staff training and recruitment efforts. Results can also be used to identify the prevalence of types of symptoms and problems in specific populations, e.g., self-reported substance abuse among adult psychiatric inpatients not admitted for nor diagnosed with a substance abuse 2

BASIS-24 RESULTS: Sample Hospital, April 212 to June 212 (LoC : In Patient) Figure 1 - BASIS-24 SCORES AT ADMISSION AND DISCHARGE... Figure 2 - COMPARISON CHART: BASIS-24 - OVERALL CHANGE SCORE... Figure 3 - COMPARISON CHART: BASIS-24 - SELF HARM CHANGE SCORE... Figure 4 - COMPARISON CHART: BASIS-24 - DEPRESSION/FUNCTIONING CHANGE SCORE... Figure 5 - COMPARISON CHART: BASIS-24 - RELATIONSHIP/INTERPERSONAL COMPETENCE... Figure 6 - COMPARISON CHART: BASIS-24 - EMOTIONAL LIABILITY CHANGE SCORE... Figure 7 - COMPARISON CHART: BASIS-24 PSYCHOSIS CHANGE SCORE... Figure 8 - COMPARISON CHART: BASIS-24 SUBSTANCE ABUSE CHANGE SCORE... Figure 9 - CONTROL CHART: BASIS-24 - OVERALL CHANGE SCORE... Figure 1 - CONTROL CHART: BASIS-24 - SELF HARM CHANGE SCORE... Figure 11 - CONTROL CHART: BASIS-24 - DEPRESSION/FUNCTIONING CHANGE SCORE... Figure 12 - CONTROL CHART: BASIS-24 - RELATIONSHIP/INTERPERSONAL COMPETENCE... Figure 13 - CONTROL CHART: BASIS-24 - EMOTIONAL LIABILITY CHANGE SCORE... Figure 14 - CONTROL CHART: BASIS-24 - PSYCHOSIS CHANGE SCORE... Figure 15 - CONTROL CHART: BASIS-24 - SUBSTANCE ABUSE CHANGE SCORE... Figure 16 - PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS... 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 3

Figure 1 - BASIS-24 SCORES AT ADMISSION AND DISCHARGE (Mean) N= 326 Admission Discharge Self Harm 5.96 Depression/Functioning 1.11 2.13 Relationship/Interpersonal Competence 1. 1 1.56 Emotional Lability 1. 2 1.8 7 Psychosis.34.69 Substance Abuse.75 1.2 6 BASIS-24 Overall.9 1.71 1 2 3 4 Level Of Difficulty: =none 1=a little 2=moderate 3=quite a bit 4=extreme BASIS-24 COMPARISON GROUP SCORES BASED ON 14579 CASES FROM 13 DIFFERENT ORGANIZATIONS Measure Admission Discharge Mean Std. Dev. Mean Std. Dev. Self Harm 1.41 1.26.51.82 Depression/Functioning 2.43 1.1 1.32.83 Relationship/Interpersonal Competence 1.74.95 1.29.97 Emotional Lability 2.15 1.5 1.3.93 Psychosis.97 1.5.53.79 Substance Abuse 1.27 1.26.85.95 BASIS-24 Overall 2.2.77 1.16.65 4

Figure 2 - COMPARISON CHART: BASIS-24 - TOTAL CHANGE SCORE HCOObservedRate ExpectedRate UpperExpRate Low erexprate 1.3 1.1.9.7.5.3.1 -.1 -.3 -.5 21 Q'1 21 Q'2 21 Q'3 211 Q'1 211 Q'2 211 Q'3 211 Q'4 212 Q'1 212 Q'2 Comparison Chart shows your health care organization s (HCO) observed range each quarter compared to expected performance based on the comparison group. The expected range (performance) is calculated using a 99% confidence interval for your observed performance. This formula takes into consideration the size of your patient population. The expected rate is the comparison group value. Qtr/Year Table of Comparison Data Using Z-score: BASIS-24 Total Change Score Quarterly Performance Compared to Performance Guidelines HCO s Number Expected Value Z-score2 Outlier status3 of cases (N) (Xe)1 HCO s Observed Value (Xo) HCO s StdDev of Observed Value (So) 21 Q'1 534.89 1..82 1.659 None 21 Q'2 411.93 1..82 2.1767 None 21 Q'3 411.83.96.82.1697 None 211 Q'1 437.81.84.82 -.1996 None 211 Q'2 276.9.94.82 1.3339 None 211 Q'3 283.84 1.13.82 92 None 211 Q'4 24.78 1.4.82 -.5811 None 212 Q'1 38.78.9.9-2.39 None 212 Q'2 326.81 1.1.9-1.6421 None 1 Expected value (Xe) is the comparison group mean 2 Z-score (<-2.576 or >+2.576) indicates whether Xo is an outlier, and if so, whether Xo is desirable or undesirable 3 Outlier status may be NONE, DESIRABLE, or UNDESIRABLE. NONE: Xo is within current performance guidelines. Z-Score between - 2.576 and 2.576. Indicates expected performance; DESIRABLE: Xo exceeds current performance guidelines. Zscore>+2.576. May indicate excellent performance. UNDESIRABLE: Xo does not meet performance guidelines. (Z-Score <-2.576. May indicate opportunity for improvement. 5

1.4 Sample Hospital, April 212 to June 212 (LoC : In Patient) Figure 3 - COMPARISON CHART: BASIS-24 - SELF HARM CHANGE SCORE HCOObservedRate ExpectedRate UpperExpRate Low erexprate 1.2 1.8.6 21 Q'1 21 Q'2 21 Q'3 211 Q'1 211 Q'2 211 Q'3 211 Q'4 212 Q'1 212 Q'2 Comparison Chart shows your health care organization s (HCO) observed range each quarter compared to expected performance based on the comparison group. The expected range (performance) is calculated using a 99% confidence interval for your observed performance. This formula takes into consideration the size of your patient population. The expected rate is the comparison group value. Table of Comparison Data Using Z-Score: Basis-24 - Self Harm Change Score Quarterly Performance Compared to Performance Guidelines Qtr/Year HCO s Number of cases (N) Expected Value (Xe)1 Z-score2 Outlier status3 HCO s Observed Value (Xo) HCO s StdDev of Observed Value (So) 21 Q'1 534.87 1.27.81 1.114 None 21 Q'2 411 1. 1.33.81 2.961 Desirable 21 Q'3 411.93 1.35.81 1.8175 None 211 Q'1 437.92 1.25.81 1.854 None 211 Q'2 276 1. 1.22.81 2.5726 None 211 Q'3 283.96 1.47.81 1.72 None 211 Q'4 24.87 1.24.81.728 None 212 Q'1 38.72 1.24 1.13-5.8525 Undesirable 212 Q'2 326.7 1.28 1.13-6.444 Undesirable 1 Expected value (Xe) is the comparison group mean. 2 Z-score (<-2.576 or >+2.576) indicates whether Xo is an outlier, and if so, whether Xo is desirable or undesirable 3 Outlier status may be NONE, DESIRABLE, or UNDESIRABLE. NONE: Xo is within current performance guidelines. Z-Score between - 2.576 and 2.576. Indicates expected performance; DESIRABLE: Xo exceeds current performance guidelines. Zscore>+2.576. May indicate excellent performance. UNDESIRABLE: Xo does not meet performance guidelines. (Z-Score <-2.576. May indicate opportunity for improvement. 6

Figure 4 - COMPARISON CHART: BASIS-24 DEPRESSION/FUNCTIONING CHANGE SCORE 1.4 1.2 1.8.6 21 Q'1 HCOObservedRate ExpectedRate UpperExpRate Low erexprate 21 Q'2 21 Q'3 211 Q'1 211 Q'2 211 Q'3 211 Q'4 212 Q'1 212 Q'2 Comparison Chart shows your health care organization s (HCO) observed range each quarter compared to expected performance based on the comparison group. The expected range (performance) is calculated using a 99% confidence interval for your observed performance. This formula takes into consideration the size of your patient population. The expected rate is the comparison group value. Table Of Comparison Data Using Z-Score: BASIS-24 Depression/Functioning Change Score Quarterly Performance Compared to Performance Guidelines Qtr/Year HCO s Number of cases (N) HCO s Observed Value (Xo) HCO s StdDev of Observed Value (So) Expected Value (Xe)1 Z-score2 Outlier status3 21 Q'1 534 1.8 1.21 1.11 -.6342 None 21 Q'2 411 1.13 1.21 1.11 698 None 21 Q'3 411 1.3 1.14 1.11-1.4369 None 211 Q'1 437 1. 1.5 1.11-2.2521 None 211 Q'2 276 1.8 1.2 1.11 -.3592 None 211 Q'3 283 1.4 1.32 1.11 -.8737 None 211 Q'4 24 1.5 1.28 1.11 -.6997 None 212 Q'1 38.96 1.11 1.7-1.6919 None 212 Q'2 326 1.2 1.22 1.7 -.6822 None 1 Expected value (Xe) is the comparison group mean. 2 Z-score (<-2.576 or >+2.576) indicates whether Xo is an outlier, and if so, whether Xo is desirable or undesirable 3 Outlier status may be NONE, DESIRABLE, or UNDESIRABLE. NONE: Xo is within current performance guidelines. Z-Score between - 2.576 and 2.576. Indicates expected performance; DESIRABLE: Xo exceeds current performance guidelines. Zscore>+2.576. May indicate excellent performance. UNDESIRABLE: Xo does not meet performance guidelines. (Z-Score <-2.576. May indicate opportunity for improvement. 7

Figure 5 - COMPARISON CHART: BASIS-24 RELATIONSHIP/INTERPERSONAL COMPETENCE CHANGE SCORE.9 HCOObservedRate ExpectedRate UpperExpRate Low erexprate.7.5.3.1 -.1 -.3 -.5 21 Q'1 21 Q'2 21 Q'3 211 Q'1 211 Q'2 211 Q'3 211 Q'4 212 Q'1 212 Q'2 Comparison Chart shows your health care organization s (HCO) observed range each quarter compared to expected performance based on the comparison group. The expected range (performance) is calculated using a 99% confidence interval for your observed performance. This formula takes into consideration the size of your patient population. The expected rate is the comparison group value. Table of Comparison Data Using Z-score: BASIS-24 Relationship/Interpersonal Competence Change Score Quarterly Performance Compared to Performance Guidelines Qtr/Year HCO s Number of cases (N) HCO s Observed Value (Xo) HCO s StdDev of Observed Value (So) Expected Value (Xe)1 Z-score2 Outlier status3 21 Q'1 534.57 1.31 4 2.2151 None 21 Q'2 411.56 1.26 4 1.948 None 21 Q'3 411.38 1.24 4 -.9453 None 211 Q'1 437 5 1.14 4.1945 None 211 Q'2 276 8 1.17 4.5549 None 211 Q'3 283 9 1.34 4.6133 None 211 Q'4 24 3 1.47 4 -.1371 None 212 Q'1 38 5 1.25.63-2.5565 None 212 Q'2 326.55 1.23.63-1.279 None 1 Expected value (Xe) is the comparison group mean 2 Z-score (<-2.576 or >+2.576) indicates whether Xo is an outlier, and if so, whether Xo is desirable or undesirable. 3 Outlier status may be NONE, DESIRABLE, or UNDESIRABLE. NONE: Xo is within current performance guidelines. Z-Score between - 2.576 and 2.576. Indicates expected performance; DESIRABLE: Xo exceeds current performance guidelines. Zscore>+2.576. May indicate excellent performance. UNDESIRABLE: Xo does not meet performance guidelines. (Z-Score <-2.576. May indicate opportunity for improvement. 8

Figure 6 -COMPARISON CHART: BASIS-24 - EMOTIONAL LABILITY CHANGE SCORE 1.3 1.1.9.7.5.3.1 -.1 -.3 -.5 21 Q'1 HCOObservedRate ExpectedRate UpperExpRate Low erexprate 21 Q'2 21 Q'3 211 Q'1 211 Q'2 211 Q'3 211 Q'4 212 Q'1 212 Q'2 Comparison Chart shows your health care organization s (HCO) observed range each quarter compared to expected performance based on the comparison group. The expected range (performance) is calculated using a 99% confidence interval for your observed performance. This formula takes into consideration the size of your patient population. The expected rate is the comparison group value. Table of Comparison Data Using Z-score: Basis-24 Emotional Lability Change Score Quarterly Performance Compared to Performance Guidelines Qtr/Year HCO s Number of cases (N) Expected Value (Xe)1 Z-score2 Outlier status3 HCO s Observed Value (Xo) HCO s StdDev of Observed Value (So) 21 Q'1 534.94 1.35.8 2.468 None 21 Q'2 411.99 1.37.8 2.7468 Desirable 21 Q'3 411.91 1.4.8 1.6614 None 211 Q'1 437.91 1.2.8 1.8699 None 211 Q'2 276.96 1.32.8 2.643 None 211 Q'3 283.86 1.54.8.67 None 211 Q'4 24.72 1.34.8 -.8947 None 212 Q'1 38.88 1.27.82.8796 None 212 Q'2 326.85 1.34.82 562 None 1 Expected value (Xe) is the comparison group mean. 2 Z-score (<-2.576 or >+2.576) indicates whether Xo is an outlier, and if so, whether Xo is desirable or undesirable 3 Outlier status may be NONE, DESIRABLE, or UNDESIRABLE. NONE: Xo is within current performance guidelines. Z-Score between - 2.576 and 2.576. Indicates expected performance; DESIRABLE: Xo exceeds current performance guidelines. Zscore>+2.576. May indicate excellent performance. UNDESIRABLE: Xo does not meet performance guidelines. (Z-Score <-2.576. May indicate opportunity for improvement. 9

Figure 7- COMPARISON CHART: BASIS-24 PSYCHOSIS CHANGE SCORE 1.8.6 - - -.6 -.8-1 21 Q'1 HCOObservedRate ExpectedRate UpperExpRate Low erexprate 21 Q'2 21 Q'3 211 Q'1 211 Q'2 211 Q'3 211 Q'4 212 Q'1 212 Q'2 Comparison Chart shows your health care organization s (HCO) observed range each quarter compared to expected performance based on the comparison group. The expected range (performance) is calculated using a 99% confidence interval for your observed performance. This formula takes into consideration the size of your patient population. The expected rate is the comparison group value. Table of Comparison Data Using Z-score: BASIS-24 Psychosis Change Score Quarterly Performance Compared to Performance Guidelines Qtr/Year HCO s Number of cases (N) Expected Value (Xe)1 Z-score2 Outlier status3 HCO s Observed Value (Xo) HCO s StdDev of Observed Value (So) 21 Q'1 534.51 1.6.39 2.5449 None 21 Q'2 411.55 1.14.39 2.8793 Desirable 21 Q'3 411 6 1.6.39 1.34 None 211 Q'1 437 9 1.5.39 1.893 None 211 Q'2 276.59 1.15.39 2.9347 Desirable 211 Q'3 283.54 1.22.39 2.658 None 211 Q'4 24 1.5.39.1176 None 212 Q'1 38 2.92.58-3.1374 Undesirable 212 Q'2 326.35 1.8.58-3.8847 Undesirable 1 Expected value (Xe) is the comparison group mean. 2 Z-score (<-2.576 or >+2.576) indicates whether Xo is an outlier, and if so, whether Xo is desirable or undesirable 3 Outlier status may be NONE, DESIRABLE, or UNDESIRABLE. NONE: Xo is within current performance guidelines. Z-Score between - 2.576 and 2.576. Indicates expected performance; DESIRABLE: Xo exceeds current performance guidelines. Zscore>+2.576. May indicate excellent performance. UNDESIRABLE: Xo does not meet performance guidelines. (Z-Score <-2.576. May indicate opportunity for improvement. 1

Figure 8- COMPARISON CHART: BASIS-24 SUBSTANCE ABUSE CHANGE SCORE.8.6 - - -.6 -.8-1 21 Q'1 HCOObservedRate ExpectedRate UpperExpRate Low erexprate 21 Q'2 21 Q'3 211 Q'1 211 Q'2 211 Q'3 211 Q'4 212 Q'1 212 Q'2 Comparison Chart shows your health care organization s (HCO) observed range each quarter compared to expected performance based on the comparison group. The expected range (performance) is calculated using a 99% confidence interval for your observed performance. This formula takes into consideration the size of your patient population. The expected rate is the comparison group value. Table of Comparison Data Using Z-score: BASIS-24 Substance Abuse Change Score Quarterly Performance Compared to Performance Guidelines Qtr/Year HCO s Number of cases (N) Expected Value (Xe)1 Z-score2 Outlier status3 HCO s Observed Value (Xo) HCO s StdDev of Observed Value (So) 21 Q'1 534.53 1.21 1 2.3252 None 21 Q'2 411.39 1.4 1 -.379 None 21 Q'3 411.38.99 1 -.5629 None 211 Q'1 437.36.94 1-1.71 None 211 Q'2 276.32 1. 1-1.4483 None 211 Q'3 283.32 1.1 1-1.4143 None 211 Q'4 24 5 1.7 1-2.31 None 212 Q'1 38 6 1.4 8 -.3427 None 212 Q'2 326.5 1.18 8.384 None 1 Expected value (Xe) is the comparison group mean. 2 Z-score (<-2.576 or >+2.576) indicates whether Xo is an outlier, and if so, whether Xo is desirable or undesirable 3 Outlier status may be NONE, DESIRABLE, or UNDESIRABLE. NONE: Xo is within current performance guidelines. Z-Score between - 2.576 and 2.576. Indicates expected performance; DESIRABLE: Xo exceeds current performance guidelines. Zscore>+2.576. May indicate excellent performance. UNDESIRABLE: Xo does not meet performance guidelines. (Z-Score <-2.576. May indicate opportunity for improvement. 11

Figure 9 - CONTROL CHART BASIS-24 TOTAL CHANGE (X-chart) UCL M Median LCL 1.4 1.2 1.8.6 Jul '1 Aug '1 Legend: X-chart: Mean - Mean of observed values for a month M - Overall mean of observed values for all months together UCL - upper control limit LCL - lower control limit Sep '1 Jan '11 Feb '11 Mar '11 Apr '11 May '11 Jun '11 Jul '11 Aug '11 Sep '11 Oct '11 Nov '11 Dec '11 Jan '12 Feb '12 Mar '12 Apr '12 May '12 Jun '12 TJC has established 3 tests to determine whether performance indicated on the X-chart is in control. Test 1: All monthly data points should be within three standard deviations of the average; Test 2: No more than 7 consecutive monthly data points should be on one side of (above or below) the average; Test 3: No more than 5 consecutive monthly data points should show a steady increase or decrease over time. A measure in statistical control does not necessarily mean that performance is satisfactory. Results may be stable, yet still indicate poor or good performance. Once results are determined to be in statistical control, they should be compared to external comparison group using a Comparison Chart. If the X-chart indicates that performance is not in control, the HCO should investigate to determine the underlying or root causes for why the process appears unstable and unpredictable. 12

Figure 1 - CONTROL CHART BASIS-24 SELF HARM (X-chart) 1.4 UCL M Median LCL 1.2 1.8.6 Jul '1 Aug '1 Legend: X-chart: Mean - Mean of observed values for a month M - Overall mean of observed values for all months together UCL - upper control limit LCL - lower control limit Sep '1 Jan '11 Feb '11 Mar '11 Apr '11 May '11 Jun '11 Jul '11 Aug '11 Sep '11 Oct '11 Nov '11 Dec '11 Jan '12 Feb '12 Mar '12 Apr '12 May '12 Jun '12 TJC has established 3 tests to determine whether performance indicated on the M-chart is in control. Test 1: All monthly data points should be within three standard deviations of the average; Test 2: No more than 7 consecutive monthly data points should be on one side of (above or below) the average; Test 3: No more than 5 consecutive monthly data points should show a steady increase or decrease over time. A measure in statistical control does not necessarily mean that performance is satisfactory. Results may be stable, yet still indicate poor or good performance. Once results are determined to be in statistical control, they should be compared to external comparison group using a Comparison Chart. If the X-chart indicates that performance is not in control, the HCO should investigate to determine the underlying or root causes for why the process appears unstable and unpredictable. 13

Figure 11 - CONTROL CHART BASIS-24 DEPRESSION/FUNCTIONING (X-chart) 1.6 UCL M Median LCL 1.4 1.2 1.8.6 Jul '1 Aug '1 Legend: X-chart: Mean - Mean of observed values for a month M - Overall mean of observed values for all months together UCL - upper control limit LCL - lower control limit Sep '1 Jan '11 Feb '11 Mar '11 Apr '11 May '11 Jun '11 Jul '11 Aug '11 Sep '11 Oct '11 Nov '11 Dec '11 Jan '12 Feb '12 Mar '12 Apr '12 May '12 Jun '12 TJC has established 3 tests to determine whether performance indicated on the X-chart is in control. Test 1: All monthly data points should be within three standard deviations of the average; Test 2: No more than 7 consecutive monthly data points should be on one side of (above or below) the average; Test 3: No more than 5 consecutive monthly data points should show a steady increase or decrease over time. A measure in statistical control does not necessarily mean that performance is satisfactory. Results may be stable, yet still indicate poor or good performance. Once results are determined to be in statistical control, they should be compared to external comparison group using a Comparison Chart. If the X-chart indicates that performance is not in control, the HCO should investigate to determine the underlying or root causes for why the process appears unstable and unpredictable. 14

Figure 12 - CONTROL CHART BASIS-24 RELATIONSHIP/INTERPERSONAL COMPETENCE (X-chart) UCL M Median LCL 1.2 1.8.6 Jul '1 Aug '1 Sep '1 Legend: X-chart: Mean - Mean of observed values for a month M - Overall mean of observed values for all months together UCL - upper control limit LCL - lower control limit Jan '11 Feb '11 Mar '11 Apr '11 May '11 Jun '11 Jul '11 Aug '11 Sep '11 Oct '11 Nov '11 Dec '11 Jan '12 Feb '12 Mar '12 Apr '12 May '12 Jun '12 TJC has established 3 tests to determine whether performance indicated on the X-chart is in control. Test 1: All monthly data points should be within three standard deviations of the average; Test 2: No more than 7 consecutive monthly data points should be on one side of (above or below) the average; Test 3: No more than 5 consecutive monthly data points should show a steady increase or decrease over time. A measure in statistical control does not necessarily mean that performance is satisfactory. Results may be stable, yet still indicate poor or good performance. Once results are determined to be in statistical control, they should be compared to external comparison group using a Comparison Chart. If the X-chart indicates that performance is not in control, the HCO should investigate to determine the underlying or root causes for why the process appears unstable and unpredictable. 15

Figure 13 - CONTROL CHART BASIS-24 EMOTIONAL LABILITY (X-chart) 1.4 UCL M Median LCL 1.2 1.8.6 Jul '1 Aug '1 Legend: X-chart: Mean - Mean of observed values for a month M - Overall mean of observed values for all months together UCL - upper control limit LCL - lower control limit Sep '1 Jan '11 Feb '11 Mar '11 Apr '11 May '11 Jun '11 Jul '11 Aug '11 Sep '11 Oct '11 Nov '11 Dec '11 Jan '12 Feb '12 Mar '12 Apr '12 May '12 Jun '12 TJC has established 3 tests to determine whether performance indicated on the X-chart is in control. Test 1: All monthly data points should be within three standard deviations of the average; Test 2: No more than 7 consecutive monthly data points should be on one side of (above or below) the average; Test 3: No more than 5 consecutive monthly data points should show a steady increase or decrease over time. A measure in statistical control does not necessarily mean that performance is satisfactory. Results may be stable, yet still indicate poor or good performance. Once results are determined to be in statistical control, they should be compared to external comparison group using a Comparison Chart. If the X-chart indicates that performance is not in control, the HCO should investigate to determine the underlying or root causes for why the process appears unstable and unpredictable. 16

Figure 14 - CONTROL CHART BASIS-24 PSYCHOSIS (X-chart).9 UCL M Median LCL.8.7.6.5.3.1 Jul '1 Aug '1 Legend: X-chart: Mean - Mean of observed values for a month M - Overall mean of observed values for all months together UCL - upper control limit LCL - lower control limit Sep '1 Jan '11 Feb '11 Mar '11 Apr '11 May '11 Jun '11 Jul '11 Aug '11 Sep '11 Oct '11 Nov '11 Dec '11 Jan '12 Feb '12 Mar '12 Apr '12 May '12 Jun '12 TJC has established 3 tests to determine whether performance indicated on the X-chart is in control. Test 1: All monthly data points should be within three standard deviations of the average; Test 2: No more than 7 consecutive monthly data points should be on one side of (above or below) the average; Test 3: No more than 5 consecutive monthly data points should show a steady increase or decrease over time. A measure in statistical control does not necessarily mean that performance is satisfactory. Results may be stable, yet still indicate poor or good performance. Once results are determined to be in statistical control, they should be compared to external comparison group using a Comparison Chart. If the X-chart indicates that performance is not in control, the HCO should investigate to determine the underlying or root causes for why the process appears unstable and unpredictable. 17

Figure 15 - CONTROL CHART BASIS-24 SUBSTANCE ABUSE (X-chart) UCL M Median LCL.9.8.7.6.5.3.1 Jul '1 Aug '1 Legend: X-chart: Mean - Mean of observed values for a month M - Overall mean of observed values for all months together UCL - upper control limit LCL - lower control limit Sep '1 Jan '11 Feb '11 Mar '11 Apr '11 May '11 Jun '11 Jul '11 Aug '11 Sep '11 Oct '11 Nov '11 Dec '11 Jan '12 Feb '12 Mar '12 Apr '12 May '12 Jun '12 TJC has established 3 tests to determine whether performance indicated on the X-chart is in control. Test 1: All monthly data points should be within three standard deviations of the average; Test 2: No more than 7 consecutive monthly data points should be on one side of (above or below) the average; Test 3: No more than 5 consecutive monthly data points should show a steady increase or decrease over time. A measure in statistical control does not necessarily mean that performance is satisfactory. Results may be stable, yet still indicate poor or good performance. Once results are determined to be in statistical control, they should be compared to external comparison group using a Comparison Chart. If the X-chart indicates that performance is not in control, the HCO should investigate to determine the underlying or root causes for why the process appears unstable and unpredictable. 18

Figure 16 - PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS N= 326 # % 25 Age Group <= 18 7 2.1 19-24 72 22.1 25-34 58 17.8 35-44 51 15.6 45-54 71 21.8 55-64 45 13.8 >= 65 22 6.7 26 Gender Male 16 49.1 Female 165 5.6 27 Hispanic / Latino Hispanic or Latino 65 25.2 Not Hispanic or Latino 193 74.8 28 Race American Indian 9 4.1 Asian 7 3.2 Black or African-American 21 9.5 White/Caucasian 173 78.3 Hawaiian or Pacific islander 2.9 Multiracial or other 9 4.1 29 How much school have you completed? 8th grade or less 5 1.7 Some High school 36 12.6 High school graduate/ged 52 18.2 Some college 134 46.9 4-Yr college grad. or higher 59 2.6 3 Marital Status Married 18 38.4 Separated 23 8.2 Divorced 34 12.1 Widowed 6 2.1 Never Married 11 39.1 19

31 Main source of social support Wife, husband or partner 125 59.8 Other Family 151 72.2 Friends/Roommates 79 37.8 Community/Church 38 18.2 Other 19 9.1 No one 16 7.7 32 Where did you sleep in the past 3 days? Apartment or house 225 79.8 Halfway house/ group home. 15 5.3 School or dormitor Hospital or tetox center 59 2.9 Nursing home/ Assisted living 2.7 Shelter/ Street 6 2.1 Jail/ Prison Other 15 5.3 33 At any time in the past 3 days, did you work at a No 181 66.1 paying job? Yes, 1-1 hours per week 17 6.2 Yes, 11-3 hours per week 12 4.4 Yes, More than 3 hours 64 23.4 34 At any time in the past 3 days, did you work at a No 257 91.1 volutineer job? Yes, 1-1 hours per week 19 6.7 Yes, 11-3 hours per week 3 1.1 Yes, More than 3 hours 3 1.1 35 At any time in the past days, were you a student Yes 36 12.8 in a high school, job or college degree program? No 245 87.2 36 Do you now receive disability benefits? No 2 72.7 Yes, for medical reasons 5 18.2 Yes, for psuchiatric reasons 32 11.6 Yes, for substance abuse 2