DCDISC Users Group. Nate Freimark Omnicare Clinical Research Presented on

Similar documents
Introduction to ADaM and What s new in ADaM

How to write ADaM specifications like a ninja.

An Efficient Solution to Efficacy ADaM Design and Implementation

From Implementing CDISC Using SAS. Full book available for purchase here. About This Book... xi About The Authors... xvii Acknowledgments...

Implementing CDISC Using SAS. Full book available for purchase here.

ADaM Reviewer s Guide Interpretation and Implementation

What is the ADAM OTHER Class of Datasets, and When Should it be Used? John Troxell, Data Standards Consulting

Automate Analysis Results Metadata in the Define-XML v2.0. Hong Qi, Majdoub Haloui, Larry Wu, Gregory T Golm Merck & Co., Inc.

Robust approach to create Define.xml v2.0. Vineet Jain

Some Considerations When Designing ADaM Datasets

Introduction to ADaM standards

Yes! The basic principles of ADaM are also best practice for our industry Yes! ADaM a standard with enforceable rules and recognized structures Yes!

CDASH Standards and EDC CRF Library. Guang-liang Wang September 18, Q3 DCDISC Meeting

ADaM Compliance Starts with ADaM Specifications

The Benefits of Traceability Beyond Just From SDTM to ADaM in CDISC Standards Maggie Ci Jiang, Teva Pharmaceuticals, Great Valley, PA

Material covered in the Dec 2014 FDA Binding Guidances

Programming checks: Reviewing the overall quality of the deliverables without parallel programming

Creating an ADaM Data Set for Correlation Analyses

Analysis Data Model Implementation Guide Version 1.1 (Draft) Prepared by the CDISC Analysis Data Model Team

ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION WHERE TO START? 1. DATA CHECK FOR CONSISTENCIES

AUTOMATED CREATION OF SUBMISSION-READY ARTIFACTS SILAS MCKEE

Dealing with changing versions of SDTM and Controlled Terminology (CT)

PharmaSUG Paper PO22

PharmaSUG Paper PO21

Updates on CDISC Standards Validation

The Implementation of Display Auto-Generation with Analysis Results Metadata Driven Method

Considerations on creation of SDTM datasets for extended studies

NCI/CDISC or User Specified CT

Harmonizing CDISC Data Standards across Companies: A Practical Overview with Examples

Legacy to SDTM Conversion Workshop: Tools and Techniques

Study Data Reviewer s Guide Completion Guideline

ADaM Implementation Guide Prepared by the CDISC ADaM Team

Traceability Look for the source of your analysis results

PharmaSUG Paper DS24

Riepilogo e Spazio Q&A

It s All About Getting the Source and Codelist Implementation Right for ADaM Define.xml v2.0

Customer oriented CDISC implementation

PharmaSUG Paper DS06 Designing and Tuning ADaM Datasets. Songhui ZHU, K&L Consulting Services, Fort Washington, PA

ADaM and traceability: Chiesi experience

Traceability in the ADaM Standard Ed Lombardi, SynteractHCR, Inc., Carlsbad, CA

ADaM Implementation Guide Status Update

Hands-On ADaM ADAE Development Sandra Minjoe, Accenture Life Sciences, Wayne, Pennsylvania

OpenCDISC Validator 1.4 What s New?

Lex Jansen Octagon Research Solutions, Inc.

Why organizations need MDR system to manage clinical metadata?

ADaM IG v1.1 & ADaM OCCDS v1.0. Dr. Silke Hochstaedter

ADaM for Medical Devices: Extending the Current ADaM Structures

Metadata and ADaM.

Deriving Rows in CDISC ADaM BDS Datasets

Hands-On ADaM ADAE Development Sandra Minjoe, Accenture Life Sciences, Wayne, Pennsylvania Kim Minkalis, Accenture Life Sciences, Wayne, Pennsylvania

From SAP to BDS: The Nuts and Bolts Nancy Brucken, i3 Statprobe, Ann Arbor, MI Paul Slagle, United BioSource Corp., Ann Arbor, MI

CDASH MODEL 1.0 AND CDASHIG 2.0. Kathleen Mellars Special Thanks to the CDASH Model and CDASHIG Teams

Now let s take a look

Advanced Data Visualization using TIBCO Spotfire and SAS using SDTM. Ajay Gupta, PPD

Use of Traceability Chains in Study Data and Metadata for Regulatory Electronic Submission

DIA 11234: CDER Data Standards Common Issues Document webinar questions

A Taste of SDTM in Real Time

Clarifications About ADaM Implementation Provided in ADaMIG Version 1.1

PharmaSUG 2014 PO16. Category CDASH SDTM ADaM. Submission in standardized tabular form. Structure Flexible Rigid Flexible * No Yes Yes

How a Metadata Repository enables dynamism and automation in SDTM-like dataset generation

TS04. Running OpenCDISC from SAS. Mark Crangle

Automated Creation of Submission-Ready Artifacts Silas McKee, Accenture, Pennsylvania, USA Lourdes Devenney, Accenture, Pennsylvania, USA

Challenges with the interpreta/on of CDISC - Who can we trust?

Application of SDTM Trial Design at GSK. 9 th of December 2010

Making a List, Checking it Twice (Part 1): Techniques for Specifying and Validating Analysis Datasets

CDISC SDTM and ADaM Real World Issues

Paper FC02. SDTM, Plus or Minus. Barry R. Cohen, Octagon Research Solutions, Wayne, PA

Doctor's Prescription to Re-engineer Process of Pinnacle 21 Community Version Friendly ADaM Development

Creating Define-XML version 2 including Analysis Results Metadata with the SAS Clinical Standards Toolkit

Beyond OpenCDISC: Using Define.xml Metadata to Ensure End-to-End Submission Integrity. John Brega Linda Collins PharmaStat LLC

Common Programming Errors in CDISC Data

Improving Metadata Compliance and Assessing Quality Metrics with a Standards Library

Interpreting CDISC ADaM IG through Users Interpretation

SDTM-ETL TM. New features in version 1.6. Author: Jozef Aerts XML4Pharma July SDTM-ETL TM : New features in v.1.6

Planning to Pool SDTM by Creating and Maintaining a Sponsor-Specific Controlled Terminology Database

SDTM Automation with Standard CRF Pages Taylor Markway, SCRI Development Innovations, Carrboro, NC

PharmaSUG2014 Paper DS09

Applying ADaM Principles in Developing a Response Analysis Dataset

PhUSE EU Connect Paper PP15. Stop Copying CDISC Standards. Craig Parry, SyneQuaNon, Diss, England

SAS Application to Automate a Comprehensive Review of DEFINE and All of its Components

Xiangchen (Bob) Cui, Tathabbai Pakalapati, Qunming Dong Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, MA

Advanced Visualization using TIBCO Spotfire and SAS

Clinical Metadata Metadata management with a CDISC mindset

Submission-Ready Define.xml Files Using SAS Clinical Data Integration Melissa R. Martinez, SAS Institute, Cary, NC USA

Pooling Clinical Data: Key points and Pitfalls. October 16, 2012 Phuse 2012 conference, Budapest Florence Buchheit

Standardising The Standards The Benefits of Consistency

Working with Composite Endpoints: Constructing Analysis Data Pushpa Saranadasa, Merck & Co., Inc., Upper Gwynedd, PA

Pooling Clinical Data: Key points and Pitfalls

SDTM Implementation Guide Clear as Mud: Strategies for Developing Consistent Company Standards

Harnessing the Web to Streamline Statistical Programming Processes

Standardizing FDA Data to Improve Success in Pediatric Drug Development

SAS offers technology to facilitate working with CDISC standards : the metadata perspective.

Standard Safety Visualization Set-up Using Spotfire

PhUSE Paper TT05

Managing CDISC version changes: how & when to implement? Presented by Lauren Shinaberry, Project Manager Business & Decision Life Sciences

Creating Define-XML v2 with the SAS Clinical Standards Toolkit 1.6 Lex Jansen, SAS

Optimization of the traceability when applying an ADaM Parallel Conversion Method

One-PROC-Away: The Essence of an Analysis Database Russell W. Helms, Ph.D. Rho, Inc.

Streamline SDTM Development and QC

Advantages of a real end-to-end approach with CDISC standards

Transcription:

DCDISC Users Group Nate Freimark Omnicare Clinical Research Presented on 2011-05-12 1

Disclaimer The opinions provided are solely those of the author and not those of the ADaM team or Omnicare Clinical Research 2

What is ADaM? Datasets created to support analyses analysis-ready Rich with metadata support DEFINE file Computational methods document/reviewer s guide Results-metadata also a component Elements for DEFINE identified DEFINE schema does not yet support Can be produced in non-xml fashion 3

ADaM vs SDTM We know in CDISC there is SDTM and ADaM Some think of SDTM as collected data and ADaM as analysis/derived data Distinction not 100% accurate and lines may get more blurred over time SDTM has many derived components AGE (unless collected on CRF) RFSTDTC/RFENDTC --DY (study day anchored by RFSTDTC) Patient Populations (SUPPDM) Rows added with DRVFL=Y (total score in QS) 4

Why Not Just Use SDTM? Components not gathered in one place Populations Treatment values Values from multiple domains (AEs by baseline APACHE score) Fixed and Rigid Structure Does not allow addition of supportive variables Does not allow for all transformations of values (categorization (RESCAT has been added but only allows one ), groupings, etc.) Unless SUPP is used as primary storage space However - Additions in SUPPs which are not 100% user-friendly Not a lot of controlled terminology huge learning curve Values can only be captured as character and not numeric No standard tools to put things together 5

Why Not Just Use SDTM? (cont.) Analysis Components not part of standard Visit windows Record selection flags Derivation methodology captured as free text Supportive variables have to be supp ed Metadata for SUPPs are not user-friendly 6

Simple Summary From SDTM Age Univariate by Treatment Group Safety Population Age from DM Treatment Group ARM from DM QNAM=SAFETY, QVAL=Y from SUPPDM Easy to create and reproduce if standard tool is available to put DM and SUPPDM together 7

Less Simple Summary From SDTM Disposition by Treatment Group Safety Population Completion Status from DS Treatment Group ARM from DM QNAM=SAFETY, QVAL=Y from SUPPDM Requires: Subsetting of DS records Merge of DM/SUPPDM Merge of DS and DM Assumes all subjects have a disposition record does not account for ongoing subjects 8

Slightly Complicated Summary From SDTM Vital Signs Summary by Analysis Visit and Treatment Group Vital Sign Values from VS Treatment Group ARM from DM QNAM=SAFETY, QVAL=Y from SUPPDM Requires: Windowing of VS records per SAP Data or metadata to support windowing decisions Selection decision if more than one record in window Merge of DM/SUPPDM Merge of VS and DM 9

So Now What? We ADaM! Decide which ADaM datasets to create Gather source data Gather source documentation Create specifications Create ADaM datasets QC datasets Create DEFINE (.doc,.pdf,.xml,html depending on requirements) Outputs and documentation we will leave for another time 10

SDTM/ADaM Relationship How do they interact? Creation Process SDTM -> ADaM ADaM Superdataset -> SDTM and ADaM ADaM -> SDTM Documentation ADaM has to point back to SDTM Reconstruction/consistency is an issue that has to be considered 11

Which ADaM Datatsets Do I Create? ADSL required Anything more is up to sponsor and reviewer ADaM Model Document: consist of the optimum number of analysis datasets needed and have enough self-sufficiency to allow analysis and review with little or no additional programming or data processing " Some possibilities: Support only selected summaries Key safety and efficacy Support all summaries Support all outputs 12

Where Does ADaM Come From? Source data and documentation: ADaM Model has ADaM datasets built from SDTM domains as the default methodology Even if SDTM is not source for ADaM, ADaM metadata has to indicate how to create ADaM from SDTM External input: Data that may not be captured in SDTM (dictionaries, IVRS variables, Evaluation Committee data) Decision spreadsheets Disallowed medications Sponsor over-rides 13

Where Does ADaM Come From? (cont.) Documents: Protocol SAP Table shells Evaluability plan (definitions for populations and end-point determinations with supportive review outputs) SDTM define 14

Analysis Dataset Specifications Everyone has their own methodology One method is to create excel spreadsheets Provides a priori direction Dataset/variable names attributes algorithms Captures post facto documentation Special rules implemented during dataset creation Decision spreadsheet values, etc. Can be used as input into Define creation Populate source/derivation column Provide content for computational method document 15

What Goes Into ADaM? ADSL Subject level population flags Planned and actual treatment variables Demographic information Randomization factors Subgrouping variables Important dates 16

What Goes Into ADaM? (cont.) BDS (Basic Data Structure) PARAM/PARAMCD (required) AVAL/AVALC (at least one is required) other analysis variables (CHG, AVALCAT1) by group variables (AGEGRP1, SEX) Selection flags (ITTRFL, ANL01FL) Treatment variables (TRTP, TRTA) Can be grouped by topic Labs, vitals, time-to-event parameters 17

More ADaMs Standards: ADAE post-public review ADTTE post-public review Some other possibilities: ADEFF ADLB ADRESP No current controlled terminology (besides for ADSL) 18

How Do You Evaluate ADaM Datasets? Fundamental Principles : Analysis datasets and their associated metadata must: facilitate clear and unambiguous communication provide traceability between the analysis data and its source data (ultimately SDTM) be readily useable by commonly available software tools Analysis datasets must: be accompanied by metadata be analysis-ready 19

How Do You Evaluate ADaM Datasets? Some principles are testable and some are not Does data and metadata allow a user to reproduce the results? Does data comply to the standard? ~180 checks defined to measure compliance Metadata for ADaM does not currently fit into define schema (parameter identifier and results metadata) Define.xml for ADaM can be created using SDTM schema but is not required 20

How Do You Document ADaM Databases? ADaM Metadata Dataset metadata Variable metadata Parameter-level metadata Results level metadata 21

Dataset Metadata 22

Dataset Metadata example 23

Variable Metadata 24

Variable Metadata example 25

Parameter-Level Metadata 26

Results Level Metadata 27

28

Results Level Metadata example 29

Does Anything From ADaM Go Back Into SDTM? Patient Populations Can go seamlessly from ADSL into SUPPDM Allows for the creators to create and the users to use Input into population creation needs a process and is a subject for another day Complicated Endpoint Values Capturing in ADaM only means it is not available with SDTM data Capturing as an SDTM data fact is possible but traceability/documentation becomes a hunting exercise Very careful process has to be followed to ensure linear process and no circular logic is followed 30

What Next? Posted Compliance checks 180 checks OpenCDISC has created ADaM Validator ADAE Draft posted >450 comments received ADTTE Draft posted >150 comments received Near future General Examples Metadata 31

Questions? Thank you all for attending!! 32

Source material: ADaM Model Document V2.1 ADAMIG V1.0 Nate.freimark@omnicarecr.com 33