Metadata Sharing Policy

Similar documents
Building Consensus: An Overview of Metadata Standards Development

For more information about how to cite these materials visit

Metadata Workshop 3 March 2006 Part 1

DIGITAL STEWARDSHIP SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION FORM

Guidelines for Developing Digital Cultural Collections

Metadata Standards and Applications

Legal Issues in Data Management: A Practical Approach

Emory Libraries Digital Collections Steering Committee Policy Suite

Alphabet Soup: A Metadata Overview Melanie Schlosser Metadata Librarian

The Clinical Data Repository Provides CPR's Foundation

1. CONCEPTUAL MODEL 1.1 DOMAIN MODEL 1.2 UML DIAGRAM

Collection Policy. Policy Number: PP1 April 2015

Data Curation Handbook Steps

Metadata: The Theory Behind the Practice

The Sunshine State Digital Network

EUROPEANA METADATA INGESTION , Helsinki, Finland

Table of contents for The organization of information / Arlene G. Taylor and Daniel N. Joudrey.

Registry Interchange Format: Collections and Services (RIF-CS) explained

Sharing Archival Metadata MODULE 20. Aaron Rubinstein

The Need for a Terminology Bridge. May 2009

For those of you who may not have heard of the BHL let me give you some background. The Biodiversity Heritage Library (BHL) is a consortium of

Data Partnerships to Improve Health Frequently Asked Questions. Glossary...9

Ontology Servers and Metadata Vocabulary Repositories

Protecting Future Access Now Models for Preserving Locally Created Content

A Dublin Core Application Profile in the Agricultural Domain

University of Bath. Publication date: Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record. Link to publication

METADATA POLICIES FOR THE DESCRIPTION OF DIGITAL FOLKLORE COLLECTIONS

case study The Asset Description Metadata Schema (ADMS) A common vocabulary to publish semantic interoperability assets on the Web July 2011

ISO 2146 INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Information and documentation Registry services for libraries and related organizations

UC Irvine LAUC-I and Library Staff Research

Introduction to Archivists Toolkit Version (update 5)

INCOMMON FEDERATION: PARTICIPANT OPERATIONAL PRACTICES

How to contribute information to AGRIS

Appendix B SUBSCRIPTION TERMS AND CONDITIONS. Addendum to British Columbia Electronic Library Network Electronic Products License Agreement

Writing a Data Management Plan A guide for the perplexed

METS For The Cultural Heritage Community: A Literature Review

Importance of cultural heritage:

InCommon Federation: Participant Operational Practices

CDL s Web Archiving System

Open Archives Initiatives Protocol for Metadata Harvesting Practices for the cultural heritage sector

Aquifer Gap Analysis Task Group Final Report August 15, 2006

National Data Sharing and Accessibility Policy-2012 (NDSAP-2012)

DOIs for Research Data

DuraSpace FAIRness and GDPR

Indiana University s Media Digitization and Preservation Initiative

INCOMMON FEDERATION: PARTICIPANT OPERATIONAL PRACTICES

INCOMMON FEDERATION: PARTICIPANT OPERATIONAL PRACTICES

James Hardiman Library. Digital Scholarship Enablement Strategy

Staying Relevant: The New Technical Services

The MEG Metadata Schemas Registry Schemas and Ontologies: building a Semantic Infrastructure for GRIDs and digital libraries Edinburgh, 16 May 2003

Information Technology Accessibility Policy

CD STRENGTH LLC. A MASSACHUSETTS, USA BASED COMPANY

Links, languages and semantics: linked data approaches in The European Library and Europeana. Valentine Charles, Nuno Freire & Antoine Isaac

INCOMMON FEDERATION: PARTICIPANT OPERATIONAL PRACTICES

Integrating Access to Digital Content

Towards semantic asset management and Core Vocabularies for e-government. Makx Dekkers Stijn Goedertier

Scientific Data Policy of European X-Ray Free-Electron Laser Facility GmbH

INCOMMON FEDERATION: PARTICIPANT OPERATIONAL PRACTICES

Search Interoperability, OAI, and Metadata

Seven Requirements for Successfully Implementing Information Security Policies and Standards

7.3. In t r o d u c t i o n to m e t a d a t a

DIGITIZATION OF HISTORICAL INFORMATION AT THE NATIONAL ARCHIVES OF ZAMBIA: CRITICAL STRATEGIC REVIEW

Comparison and mapping of VRA Core and IMS Meta-data

Alphabet Soup: Choosing Among DC, QDC, MARC, MARCXML, and MODS. Jenn Riley IU Metadata Librarian DLP Brown Bag Series February 25, 2005

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Information and documentation Managing metadata for records Part 2: Conceptual and implementation issues

UKOLN involvement in the ARCO Project. Manjula Patel UKOLN, University of Bath

INCOMMON FEDERATION: PARTICIPANT OPERATIONAL PRACTICES

STRATEGIC PLAN

Update on the TDL Metadata Working Group s activities for

Request for Proposals. The National Center for State Courts (NCSC) requests proposals for the. Graphic Design of Trends in State Courts 2018

Workshop B: Application Profiles Canadian Metadata Forum September 28, 2005

Data Governance. Mark Plessinger / Julie Evans December /7/2017

INCOMMON FEDERATION: PARTICIPANT OPERATIONAL PRACTICES

Building a missing item in INSPIRE: The Re3gistry

Archives in a Networked Information Society: The Problem of Sustainability in the Digital Information Environment

SAS Web Infrastructure Kit 1.0. Overview

Basic Profile 1.0. Promoting Web Services Interoperability Across Platforms, Applications and Programming Languages

Toward Horizon 2020: INSPIRE, PSI and other EU policies on data sharing and standardization

An aggregation system for cultural heritage content

S1000D International Specification for Technical Publications

Data driven transformation of the public sector Tallinn, Estonia Head of unit 22 September 2016 European Commission

Privacy Policy. LAST UPDATED: 23 June March 2017

INCOMMON FEDERATION: PARTICIPANT OPERATIONAL PRACTICES

INCOMMON FEDERATION: PARTICIPANT OPERATIONAL PRACTICES

Creating a System for the Online Delivery of Oral History Content

You may print, preview, or create a file of the report. File options are: PDF, XML, HTML, RTF, Excel, or CSV.

A common metadata approach to support egovernment interoperability

Increasing access to OA material through metadata aggregation

Making cloud SLAs readily usable in the EU private sector. C-SIG WG on Cloud Standards 18 January 2017 Brussels, Belgium

Metadata Management System (MMS)

Swedish National Data Service, SND Checklist Data Management Plan Checklist for Data Management Plan

Making the most of metadata with Metadata 2020

Secure Messaging is far more than traditional encryption.

INCOMMON FEDERATION: PARTICIPANT OPERATIONAL PRACTICES

Building Institutional Repositories: Emerging Challenges

UHCL s Proactive Approach to Accessible Electronic Information

INCOMMON FEDERATION: PARTICIPANT OPERATIONAL PRACTICES

Ponds, Lakes, Ocean: Pooling Digitized Resources and DPLA. Emily Jaycox, Missouri Historical Society SLRLN Tech Expo 2018

INCOMMON FEDERATION: PARTICIPANT OPERATIONAL PRACTICES

Dynamic management of digital preservation

Transcription:

University of California Libraries Metadata Sharing Policy Lisa Rowlison de Ortiz UC Berkeley, June 2015

Why is the Policy important? Establishes a major area for collaboration Who would make use of shared library metadata? Is library metadata the most beneficial focus? How might LOD be hosted/deployed? What technical options make sense for a UC LOD implementation?

UC Libraries Metadata Sharing Policy UCL Plan & Priorities Goal #3 Maximize discovery of and access to information resources: Faculty and staff are adopting new techniques to identify, find, and use information resources. As user behaviors evolve, library services must adapt to provide better, faster, and broader access and support.

Introduction, con t. Bibliographic and authority data in local library systems Descriptive, administrative, and technical metadata in local digital asset management systems Archival finding aids User-contributed metadata Metadata in institutional repositories

Policy All UC Libraries, including CDL, are empowered to share metadata within constraints imposed by contractual agreements or by law. This includes metadata that is managed by an individual campus library or collectively managed by CDL.

Policy, con t. For the purposes of this policy, metadata is defined as structured information that describes resources, allowing users to locate, retrieve, interpret, or manage those resources.

Policy, con t. Although the UC Libraries are not obligated to share their metadata, sharing is encouraged because the use and re-use of open metadata facilitates discovery, furthers knowledge and research, and provides public access to rich scholarly and cultural heritage content.

Seven Guidelines 1. Libraries will place the fewest possible restrictions on the reuse of the metadata they share. The preferred standard under which to share UC Libraries metadata is CC0, the Creative Commons Zero Public Domain Dedication.

CC0 no rights reserved Public Domain Dedication the human-readable summary The person who associated a work with this deed has dedicated the work to the public domain by waiving all of his or her rights to the work worldwide under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights, to the extent allowed by law. You can copy, modify, distribute and perform the work, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission.

2. Metadata will be shared in accordance with the law: Seven Guidelines Consistent with contractual terms, copyright law, privacy rights UC will make reasonable effort to retract if in violation of the above

Seven Guidelines 4. Metadata should be shared in formats that facilitate its reuse, such formats to be determined by the sharing library.

Panoply of schema in use by UC libraries: CDWA HTML PREMIS XML CSDGM MARC RDF DC METS TSV EAD MODS VRA

Seven Guidelines 5. Those who contribute metadata to UC Libraries that is not covered by a purchase and/or contractual agreement must be made aware of the terms under which their metadata may be shared.

Seven Guidelines 6. UC Libraries will take reasonable measures to keep shared metadata accurate and correct. 7. UC Libraries should include their preferred URL in the metadata they share to direct users back to the resource being described.

UC Shared Metadata is 1. Open 2. Legal 3. By Choice 4. Interoperable 5. Community created 6. Accurate 7. Linked

Collaborative Activity Break into 9 groups of approx.10 Use sticky-notes to write responses, ideas, follow-up questions After approx. 10-15 min. move to a different question board

Question Board 1: a) What are the benefits to sharing UC library metadata? b) How would it be used? c) Who would make use of it

Question Board 2: a) What types of data/metadata should we focus on sharing Library only? Campus partners? Faculty/Research? b) How might we acquire and make use of campus partner, faculty, or research data / metadata?

Question Board 3: a) What value would UC get from publishing its Library metadata? b) Should campus libraries be responsible for campus metadata in general?

Question Board 4: a) How might UC LOD metadata be hosted / deployed? b) What technical solutions are available?

Question Board 5: a) What are some barriers to making UC LOD available using the Metadata Sharing Policy and its guidelines? b) What role should Open play in metadata sharing?

Question Board 6: How would you rank the importance of UC LOD against other UC initiatives and/or CoUL plans and priorities? Why?

Question Board 7: What challenges and opportunities might the UC libraries encounter around shared schema development?

Question Board 8: What schema, vocabularies, and kinds of resources or collections might be good candidates for a UC collaborative project?

Question Board 9: What technical options might make sense for a UC LOD implementation?

Thank you! The California Digital Library and UC Berkeley LOD Reception begins at 5:30 pm in the Morrison Room, of Doe Library