An introduction to understanding the deflection of beams using the Push Me Pull Me models on Expedition Workshed

Similar documents
Introduction. Section 3: Structural Analysis Concepts - Review

8. Plastic Analysis. 8.1 Introduction. Figure 8.1

Case Study - Vierendeel Frame Part of Chapter 12 from: MacLeod I A (2005) Modern Structural Analysis, ICE Publishing

CE2302 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS I Important Questions PART B

Tutorial 1: Welded Frame - Problem Description

Engineering Effects of Boundary Conditions (Fixtures and Temperatures) J.E. Akin, Rice University, Mechanical Engineering

LIGO Scissors Table Static Test and Analysis Results

SAP 2000 Problem II Homework Problem P5.45. Recall from Lab #6 the Global and Local Reference Coordinate Systems for 2D Problems

Behaviour of cold bent glass plates during the shaping process

HOW to ANALYZE a SIMPLY SUPPORTED BEAM for INTERNAL FORCES, REACTION

Chapter 3 Analysis of Original Steel Post

WP1 NUMERICAL BENCHMARK INVESTIGATION

Revision of the SolidWorks Variable Pressure Simulation Tutorial J.E. Akin, Rice University, Mechanical Engineering. Introduction

[3] Rigid Body Analysis

Kinematics of Machines Prof. A. K. Mallik Department of Mechanical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur. Module 10 Lecture 1

E and. L q. AE q L AE L. q L

Beams. Lesson Objectives:

Master and Slave Nodes (Rigid Link Function)

Frame Analysis Using Visual Analysis

Visit the following websites to learn more about this book:

Analysis of Composite Aerospace Structures Finite Elements Professor Kelly

FEA BENDING, TORSION, TENSION, and SHEAR TUTORIAL in CATIA

ES 230 Strengths Intro to Finite Element Modeling & Analysis Homework Assignment 2

Example Lecture 12: The Stiffness Method Prismatic Beams. Consider again the two span beam previously discussed and determine

2D Tutorial. Project Description: Running VisualAnalysis: Setting Up the Project:

THREE DIMENSIONAL ACES MODELS FOR BRIDGES

The Generate toolbar has convenient tools to create typical structural shapes.

Manual BS : 2000 steel code check

SAFI Sample Projects. Design of a Steel Structure. SAFI Quality Software Inc. 3393, chemin Sainte-Foy Ste-Foy, Quebec, G1X 1S7 Canada

A pipe bend is subjected to a concentrated force as shown: y All dimensions in inches. Material is stainless steel.

Appendix B: Creating and Analyzing a Simple Model in Abaqus/CAE

SUBMERGED CONSTRUCTION OF AN EXCAVATION

Lab#5 Combined analysis types in ANSYS By C. Daley

ANALYSIS OF BOX CULVERT - COST OPTIMIZATION FOR DIFFERENT ASPECT RATIOS OF CELL

UNIT-I ENERGY METHODS & INDETERMINATE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Creating and Analyzing a Simple Model in Abaqus/CAE

Optics INTRODUCTION DISCUSSION OF PRINCIPLES. Reflection by a Plane Mirror

Torsional-lateral buckling large displacement analysis with a simple beam using Abaqus 6.10

Supplementary information

ANALYSIS OF SIMPLE AND CANTILEVER BEAMS USING MATLAB GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES

This document gives a detailed summary of the new features and improvements of FEM- Design version 16.

General Information Project management Introduction... 4 Getting Started Input geometry... 7

Design Optimization of Robotic Arms

Tutorial 4 Arch Bridge

PLAXIS 2D - SUBMERGED CONSTRUCTION OF AN EXCAVATION

Solid Bodies and Disjointed Bodies

Solid Bodies and Disjointed bodies

Introduction to SolidWorks for Technology. No1: Childs Toy

Cylinders in Vs An optomechanical methodology Yuming Shen Tutorial for Opti521 November, 2006

Scientific Manual FEM-Design 17.0

Lesson: Static Stress Analysis of a Connecting Rod Assembly

In part 2, we demonstrate the following additional topics:

Modeling Skills Stress Analysis J.E. Akin, Rice University, Mech 417

Kinematics of Machines Prof. A. K. Mallik Department of Mechanical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur. Module - 3 Lecture - 1

Frame Analysis Using Multiframe4D

A function: A mathematical relationship between two variables (x and y), where every input value (usually x) has one output value (usually y)

SETTLEMENT OF A CIRCULAR FOOTING ON SAND

ME5286 Robotics Spring 2013 Quiz 1

ABAQUS/CAE Tutorial: Large Deformation Analysis of Beam-Plate in Bending

3 SETTLEMENT OF A CIRCULAR FOOTING ON SAND (LESSON 1) Figure 3.1 Geometry of a circular footing on a sand layer

Introduction to Computer Aided Engineering: Solidworks and Cosmosworks using CosmosXpress

Static Stress Analysis

ME 442. Marc/Mentat-2011 Tutorial-1

Quarter Symmetry Tank Stress (Draft 4 Oct 24 06)

Contact Analysis. Learn how to: define surface contact solve a contact analysis display contact results. I-DEAS Tutorials: Simulation Projects

Effect of the Initial Shape of L-angle Member into Bending Properties on Push-Through Bending of Aluminum Extrusion Section

Finite Element Specialists and Engineering Consultants

Challenge Problem 5 - The Solution Dynamic Characteristics of a Truss Structure

Normal Data ID1050 Quantitative & Qualitative Reasoning

Buckling of Rigid Frames I

We can use square dot paper to draw each view (top, front, and sides) of the three dimensional objects:

Guidelines for proper use of Plate elements

1. Carlos A. Felippa, Introduction to Finite Element Methods,

Teaching Structural Behavior with a Physics Engine. Kirk Martini 1. VA 22904; PH ;

D DAVID PUBLISHING. Stability Analysis of Tubular Steel Shores. 1. Introduction

Exercise 1. 3-Point Bending Using the Static Structural Module of. Ansys Workbench 14.0

CE Advanced Structural Analysis. Lab 4 SAP2000 Plane Elasticity

Exercise 1. 3-Point Bending Using the GUI and the Bottom-up-Method

Slope Deflection Method

Calculation of initial pretension for a cable-stayed bridge using Cable Force Tuning function in midas Civil

1.2 Connection configurations:

Structural Analysis of an Aluminum Spiral Staircase. EMCH 407 Final Project Presented by: Marcos Lopez and Dillan Nguyen

Finite Element Course ANSYS Mechanical Tutorial Tutorial 3 Cantilever Beam

Problem 1. Lab #12 Solution


Advanced Professional Training

BE PLATES. Manual. July Friedel Hartmann. statik.de statik.de

DIFFERENT TECHNIQUES FOR THE MODELING OF POST-TENSIONED CONCRETE BOX-GIRDER BRIDGES

Reflection and Refraction

TUTORIAL INCLUDING PUSHOVER ANALYSIS

1-8 Exploring Transformations

CITY AND GUILDS 9210 UNIT 135 MECHANICS OF SOLIDS Level 6 TUTORIAL 15 - FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS - PART 1

Revised Sheet Metal Simulation, J.E. Akin, Rice University

WIRE BASICS ESTIMATED TIME REQUIRED. This tutorial will teach you the basics of sketching wires and using them as contours for solid objects.

OPENSEES Soil-Pile Interaction Study under Lateral Spread Loading

Lecture 17. ENGR-1100 Introduction to Engineering Analysis CENTROID OF COMPOSITE AREAS

CATIA V5 Parametric Surface Modeling

Multiframe Windows Version 16. User Manual

Truss Analysis using Multiframe

Module 1: Introduction to Finite Element Analysis. Lecture 4: Steps in Finite Element Analysis

Transcription:

Worksheet 2 Deflections of Beams An introduction to understanding the deflection of beams using the Push Me Pull Me models on Expedition Workshed

introduction Understanding how structures deform and deflect upon mechanical loading is a key part of understanding structural behaviour. The deflected shape of a structure can provide information on the bending stresses, since the way the curvature varies along the beam is related to the bending moment. Using Push Me Pull Me models, this tutorial will help students understand how an action will cause a given structure to deflect for a given set of support conditions. The first part of this tutorial provides worked examples of different loaded structural configurations, with hints and tips on how to estimate the deflected shape. Then, students are asked to sketch the approximate deflected shape of different structures and use Push Me Pull Me models to verify their answers. PG. 2

Cantilever A cantilever is the simplest single-support, isostatic structure. Natural cantilevers are seen in the form of trees everywhere. Find the cantilever on the Push Me Pull Me Expedition Workshed website: WORKSHED > MODELS > PMPM > CANTILEVER BEAM Looking at the render of the real structure (Fig.1), it has a single support on the left-hand side. This support is modelled as a fixed support in Fig. 2. Kinematically, this means that the left-hand end cannot move horizontally or vertically. Furthermore the rotation of the left hand end is suppressed. This is a modelling assumption that can be considered valid, due to the fact that the support connection has bolts located at some distance from the beam s neutral axis, preventing translational and rotational displacements. Fig 1. Cantilever Push Me Pull Me model Therefore under the application of any load, anywhere along the beam, the left hand end will remain at its unloaded position. y Δ x (x =0) = 0 Δ y (x =0) = 0 θ(x =0) = 0 Kinematic Assumptions (i.e. Starting Point) θ x Fig 2. Line model of a cantilever showing the boundary conditions for horizontal and vertical deflection, and for rotation at the left hand end of the structure. PG. 3

Cantilever Assuming the structure is stable out-of-plane, applying a lateral (vertical) load anywhere along the beam will cause it to bend and deflect in the direction of the load. Δ y ( 2 L ) Observations: a) The left hand side (x=0) has not moved or rotated. b) The largest vertical deflection occurs at the right hand tip of the beam (x=l). x θ ( L 2 ) Δ y (L) θ(l) c) The beam bends (flexes) between the fixed end and the point of load application. Beyond that point the beam remains straight. θ ( L )= θ (L) 2 L Δ y ( )< Δy (L) 2 Quiz: At which point along the structure would you place the load to maximize the vertical displacement at midspan? Fig 3. Diagram showing the deflection of a cantilever when a point load is applied halfway along its length. PG. 4

Simply Supported Beam Example A simply supported beam is another common type of isostatic structure this time being supported at both ends. As depicted in Fig.4, the left-hand side is bolted very close to the neutral axis. The support on the right-hand side is very similar, the only difference being the slotted cleat angles connecting the beam to the wall allow (some) horizontal displacement of the beam. On the Expedition Workshed website go to: WORKSHED > MODELS > PMPM > SIMPLY SUPPORTED BEAM Looking at the kinematics of the beam and assuming out-of plane stability, the beam can be modelled with a triangular simple support on the left that suppresses translations (i.e. horizontal and vertical movement) and on the right with a roller support that suppresses only vertical displacements (Fig.5). Rotations are free at both ends and upon the application of a load anywhere along the beam, the ends will rotate. Fig 4. Simply Supported Beam Push Me Pull Me model of Expedition Workshed. Δ y (0) = 0 Δ x (0) = 0 Δ y (L) = 0 x y Fig 5. Line model of a simply supported beam showing the boundary conditions at both ends. PG. 5

Simply Supported Beam Upon the application of a lateral load the beam will deflect in the direction of the load as a result of bending. Observations: a) Applying the vertical point load anywhere along the beam does not change the position of the two ends. They simply rotate to accommodate beam flexure (Fig. 6). Δ y (0) = 0 Δ x (0) = 0 Δ y (L) = 0 b) If the vertical load is applied at midspan, the maximum diplacement and flexure will coincide with the point of application (Fig. 6). c) If the point load is applied anywhere along the beam, except midspan, then the maximum vertical displacement does not coincide with the maximum curvature, which occurs at the point of load application (Fig. 7). Fig 6. Line model of a simply supported beam with a point load applied at the centre of the span. d) As there is nothing to prevent the ends of the beam from rotating, the curvature at either end is always zero. Quiz: Under the application of a moderate lateral load, why doesn't the right hand support move in? Maximum Curvature Maximum Vertical Displacement Fig 7. The deflection of a simply supported beam under the action of a non-central point load. PG. 6

SimPLY Supp. Beam with Cantilever end An extension to the simply supported beam is the simply supported beam with a cantilever at one end. In real life this structural configuration can be described by a simple cleat angle connection on one end and a support column between the main span and the cantilever as this is depicted in Fig. 8. This second support provides vertical restraint but allows the beam to rotate. It should be noted however that the beam on the left-hand side and the right-hand side of the support rotate simultaneously since the beam is continuous over the support. On the Expedition Workshed website this can be found at: WORKSHED > MODELS > PMPM > SIMPLY SUPPORTED WITH CANTILEVER Fig 8. Simply Supported Beam with Cantilever Beam End Push Me Pull Me model. By clicking on draw model the mathematical model is revealed (Fig. 9), with a simple support on the left (vertical & horizontal restraint) and a roller support on the right (vertical restraint only). Fig 9. Line model of a simply supported beam with a cantilever end. Note that the pin on the roller support is under the beam. If the pin were in the beam, the right-hand end would simply collapse. PG. 7

SimPLY Supp. Beam with Cantilever END Upon the application of a point load in the main span (ie. between the two supports), the beam would behave like the simply supported example, assuming the self-weight of the beam is not considered, with the beam bending between the two supports which allow free rotation, and the cantilever deflecting but remaining straight. The downward curvature of the main span of the beam is referred to as `sagging (see fig. 10). When the point load is applied anywhere along the cantilever (ie. to the right hand side of the right-hand support), the whole beam is seen to be deflecting and curving upwards, which is referred to as hogging. Δ y (0) = 0 Δ x (0) = 0 L L/2 Δ y (L) = 0 Fig 10. Simply Supported Beam with Cantilever line model featuring a load in the main span, demonstrating again the boundary condition and also the notation of the case. Quiz: In the case where the point load is applied on the cantilever, is the portion of the beam to the right of the right-hand support straight? Trivia: The term 'hogging' comes from the back of a pig (aka 'hog') which resembles the deflected shape of a beam that is curving upwards. Fig 11. The same line model, this time with the load shifted to the end of the cantilever. Note the change from sagging in Fig 10. to hogging in Fig 11. PG. 8

Encastre (Fully Fixed) Beam An encastré (also known as a 'fully fixed') beam is one in which rotations and displacements are suppressed at both ends. Practically, this can be achieved by fixing the steel beam depicted in Fig. 12 with a wide plate which is bolted on the wall. The bolts not only provide vertical and horizontal restraint but also by placing them some distance away from the beam's neutral axis, they prohibit rotation at the two ends. Quiz: The encastré beam is said to be hyperstatic. What does that mean and to what degree is this the case? Fig 12. Encastré Beam Push Me Pull Me model The beam can be found on the Expedition Workshed website at: WORKSHED > MODELS > PMPM > ENCASTRE BEAM The mathematical model of the 2D beam restricts all displacements at the ends, making the response of the beam stiffer. Due to the presence of rotational restraints, there are two points of contraflexure on either side of the applied load, as can be seen in Fig.13. At a point of contraflexure, curvature changes sign as seen in Fig. 13. Δ y (0) = 0 Δ x (0) = 0 θ (0) = 0 Δ y (L) = 0 Δ x (L) = 0 θ (L) = 0 Quiz: if the point load is applied at midspan, where are the points of contraflexure located? Fig 13. Encastré beam line model with a load in the centre of the beam. The 'X' marks correspond to the points of contraflexure. PG. 9

Continuous Beam with Internal Pin Sometimes continuous beams are designed such that a long beam is connected via a plate joining the webs of the girders as shown for the right span in Fig. 14. The presence of the small connecting plates on either side of the web, allow the free rotation at the connection, since the connection acts like a door hinge. The beam can be found on the Expedition Workshed website at WORKSHED > MODELS > PMPM > TWO SPAN SIMPLY SUPPORTED BEAM CONTINUOUS OVER CENTRAL SUPPORT WITH INTERNAL PIN The mathematical model of the 2D beam suppresses the vertical and horizontal displacements on the left support and the vertical displacement at the central and right support. The pin in the middle of the right span models the web plate connection assuming free rotation at that location. Fig 14. Continuous Beam with Internal Pin. Quiz: By applying the load at several different locations along the beam, do you see any points of contraflexure? Fig 15. A line diagram of the same beam. PG. 10

Questions Being able to sketch approximate beam deflection shapes is an extremely important skill for a civil engineer. Try the examples below and then use Push Me Pull Me models to verify your results. a. d. b. e. c. f. PG. 11

Questions g. j. h. k. i. PG. 12