Afilias DNSSEC Practice Statement (DPS) Version

Similar documents
APNIC DNSSEC APNIC DNSSEC. Policy and Practice Statement. DNSSEC Policy and Practice Statement Page 1 of 12

CIRA DNSSEC PRACTICE STATEMENT

Richemont DNS Inc. DNS Practice Statement for the PANERAI Zone. Version 0.2

DNSSEC Practice Statement

DNSSEC Practice Statement. for the.man TLD. Knipp Medien und Kommunikation GmbH

DNSSEC Practice Statement (DPS) for.lat TLD

DNSSEC PRACTICE STATEMENT FOR TOP-LEVEL DOMAINS

DNSSEC Practice Statement

The Common Controls Framework BY ADOBE

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: ISSN: T. Okubo ICANN January 2013

DNSSEC Practice Statement.CORSICA

12 DNS Security Extensions DNS resolution via recursive nameserver DNS request/response format Simple DNS cache poisoning The Dan Kaminsky DNS

Hoda Rohani Anastasios Poulidis Supervisor: Jeroen Scheerder. System and Network Engineering July 2014

DNS Security and DNSSEC in the root zone Luzern, Switzerland February 2010

NETWORK AND CERTIFICATE SYSTEM SECURITY REQUIREMENTS

Draft Applicant Guidebook, v3

SECURITY & PRIVACY DOCUMENTATION

DNSSec Operation Manual for the.cz and e164.arpa Registers

Apple Corporate Certificates Certificate Policy and Certification Practice Statement. Apple Inc.

DNSSEC for the Root Zone. ICANN 37 Nairobi March 2010

4. Performance Specifications. 4.1 Goals and intentions of Service Level Agreements and Public Service Monitoring. Goals of Service Level Agreements:

DNSSEC for the Root Zone. IETF 76 8 November 2009

TARGET2-SECURITIES INFORMATION SECURITY REQUIREMENTS

2.4. Target Audience This document is intended to be read by technical staff involved in the procurement of externally hosted solutions for Diageo.

University of Pittsburgh Security Assessment Questionnaire (v1.7)

DNSSEC for the Root Zone. NZNOG Hamilton, NZ January 2010

DNS/DNSSEC Workshop. In Collaboration with APNIC and HKIRC Hong Kong. Champika Wijayatunga Regional Security Engagement Manager Asia Pacific

Trust Services Principles and Criteria

DNSSEC for the Root Zone. IETF 76 Hiroshima November 2009

ORA HIPAA Security. All Affiliate Research Policy Subject: HIPAA Security File Under: For Researchers

Morningstar ByAllAccounts Service Security & Privacy Overview

Apple Inc. Certification Authority Certification Practice Statement. Apple Application Integration Sub-CA Apple Application Integration 2 Sub-CA

DIGITALSIGN - CERTIFICADORA DIGITAL, SA.

Draft Applicant Guidebook, v4

3. The DNSSEC Primer. Data Integrity (hashes) Authenticated Denial of Existence (NSEC,

.BIZ Agreement Appendix 10 Service Level Agreement (SLA) (22 August 2013)

Apple Inc. Certification Authority Certification Practice Statement Worldwide Developer Relations Version 1.10 Effective Date: June 10, 2013

Apple Inc. Certification Authority Certification Practice Statement

THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY PUBLIC KEY INFRASTRUCTURE CERTIFICATE POLICY. November 2015 Version 4.0. Copyright , The Walt Disney Company

ISO27001 Preparing your business with Snare

Algorithm for DNSSEC Trusted Key Rollover

gtld Applicant Guidebook (v ) Module 5

Shared cctld DNSSEC Signing Platform Bill Woodcock and Rick Lamb ICANN San Francisco March 2011

Keeping DNS parents and children in sync at Internet Speed! Ólafur Guðmundsson

1. Post for 45-day comment period and pre-ballot review. 7/26/ Conduct initial ballot. 8/30/2010

National Identity Exchange Federation. Trustmark Signing Certificate Policy. Version 1.0. Published October 3, 2014 Revised March 30, 2016

Annex 1 to NIST Special Publication Recommended Security Controls for Federal Information Systems

Criminal Justice Information Security (CJIS) Guide for ShareBase in the Hyland Cloud

SSL Certificates Certificate Policy (CP)

Certification Practice Statement of the Federal Reserve Banks Services Public Key Infrastructure

DNSSEC Trust tree: (A) ---dnslab.org. (DS keytag: 9247 dig (DNSKEY keytag. ---org. (DS keytag: d

Apple Inc. Certification Authority Certification Practice Statement

Trust Services Practice Statement

Information Security Policy

INFORMATION SECURITY. One line heading. > One line subheading. A briefing on the information security controls at Computershare

ISC2. Exam Questions CISSP. Certified Information Systems Security Professional (CISSP) Version:Demo

AfriNIC 14 Shared cctld DNSSEC Signing Platform June 9, 2011 Bill Woodcock Research Director Packet Clearing House

InterCall Virtual Environments and Webcasting

Certificate Policy for Deployment and Operation of European Cooperative Intelligent Transport Systems (C-ITS)

GDPR Processor Security Controls. GDPR Toolkit Version 1 Datagator Ltd

QUICKSIGN Registration Policy

Solution Pack. Managed Services Virtual Private Cloud Security Features Selections and Prerequisites

Projectplace: A Secure Project Collaboration Solution

CERTIFICATE POLICY CIGNA PKI Certificates

Juniper Vendor Security Requirements

Root Servers. Root hints file come in many names (db.cache, named.root, named.cache, named.ca) See root-servers.org for more detail

Checklist: Credit Union Information Security and Privacy Policies

AWS continually manages risk and undergoes recurring assessments to ensure compliance with industry standards.

The following security and privacy-related audits and certifications are applicable to the Lime Services:

Part 11 Compliance SOP

Applications/Data To Include in Survey (include applications that meet one or more of the following criteria)

RADIAN6 SECURITY, PRIVACY, AND ARCHITECTURE

TeliaSonera Gateway Certificate Policy and Certification Practice Statement

ADIENT VENDOR SECURITY STANDARD

WORKSHARE SECURITY OVERVIEW

e-authentication guidelines for esign- Online Electronic Signature Service

Executive Order 13556

Data Security and Privacy Principles IBM Cloud Services

Donor Credit Card Security Policy

Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers ( ICANN )

"Charting the Course... Certified Information Systems Auditor (CISA) Course Summary

emarketeer Information Security Policy

Standard: Event Monitoring

Trust Service Provider Technical Best Practices Considering the EU eidas Regulation (910/2014)

Applicability Statement: DNS Security (DNSSEC) DNSKEY Algorithm Implementation Status

Root Zone DNSSEC KSK Rollover

EXCERPT. NIST Special Publication R1. Protecting Controlled Unclassified Information in Nonfederal Systems and Organizations

DNSSEC the.se way: Overview, deployment and lessons learned. Anne-Marie Eklund Löwinder Quality & Security Manager

Lakeshore Technical College Official Policy

Page 1 of 15. Applicability. Compatibility EACMS PACS. Version 5. Version 3 PCA EAP. ERC NO ERC Low Impact BES. ERC Medium Impact BES

Awareness Technologies Systems Security. PHONE: (888)

7.16 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SECURITY

Public Key Infrastructure PKI. National Digital Certification Center Information Technology Authority Sultanate of Oman

Apple Inc. Certification Authority Certification Practice Statement Worldwide Developer Relations

Sparta Systems TrackWise Digital Solution

Managed NIDS Care Services

Security Policies and Procedures Principles and Practices

Certified Information Systems Auditor (CISA)

Table of Contents. PCI Information Security Policy

RECORDS MANAGEMENT RECORDS MANAGEMENT SERVICES

Transcription:

Afilias DNSSEC Practice Statement (DPS) Version 1.07 2018-02-26 Page 1 of 8

1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. Overview This document was created using the template provided under the current practicing documentation. 1 This document comprises the practices utilized by Afilias to operate DNS zones as it relates to the DNS Security Extensions. Unless stated otherwise within this document, these statements pertain to all TLD zones under Afilias auspice that have been signed. 1.2. Document name and identification Afilias DNSSEC Practice Statement (DPS) Version 1.06 1.3. Community and Applicability This section describes the various stakeholders of the functionality provided by DNSSEC and a signed TLD. 1.3.1. The TLD Registry Afilias operates in two distinct modes: (1) As a Registry Operator (RO), where the TLD has been directly delegated to Afilias by ICANN, and (2) as a Back End Service Provider (BESP), where Afilias operates and performs the functions of maintaining the zone, on behalf of another entity (which acts as the RO). In the case where Afilias is the RO for a zone, Afilias is also acting as the BESP. The Registry is expected to perform the following functions: - Generate the Key Signing Keys (KSK) for the zone. - Generate the Zone Signing Keys (ZSK) for the zone. - Sign the ZSK using the KSK. - Sign the relevant Resource Records of the zone using the ZSK. - Update the ZSK and KSK as needed. - Send Delegation Signer (DS) Resource records to ICANN for inclusion into the root zone. - Receive DS Resource Records from accredited registrars, and update the zone accordingly. - Update the WHOIS information accordingly. 1.3.2. Accredited Registrars Registrars that are accredited by a given TLD RO are required to make changes to the zone using one of two mechanisms: (1) via EPP, or (2) via a Web Administration Tool. The Web Administration Tool is an Afilias provided front end to EPP, so, in effect, all changes to the registry are made via EPP. For DNSSEC, registrars are expected to maintain Delegation Signer (DS) records with Afilias on behalf of their customer, the registrant. 1.3.3. Registrants Registrants are responsible for ensuring that their second level zones are properly signed and maintained. They must also generate and upload DS records for their signed zones to their registrar (who, in turn, sends these into Afilias). 1 Definitions for many of the terms used in this document are defined in Section 2 of RFC 6841. Page 2 of 8

1.4. Specification Administration 1.4.1. Specification administration organization Afilias maintains this specification. 1.4.2. Contact Information Questions or concerns regarding this DPS, or the operation of a signed TLD should be sent to the Afilias Customer Support Center. They can be reached via: Phone: +1 416.646.3306 Email: support@afilias.info 1.4.3. Specification change procedures The DPS is reviewed periodically and updated as appropriate. All changes are reviewed by operations and security teams and submitted to executive management for approval. Once accepted, procedures are updated, and appropriate personnel are trained on any new or changed practice. Once all preparatory work has been completed, the DPS is published and becomes effective as of its publication. 2. PUBLICATION AND REPOSITORIES 2.1. Repositories This DPS can be found at http://www.afilias.info/dps Only the Afilias Operations department has the ability to update the contents of the website. ACLs on the file are Read-Only. 2.2. Publication of public keys Afilias generates DS-record data for zones that fall under Afilias control, either through direct contractual delegation by ICANN, or via contract with a Registry Operator using Afilias to provide DNS services. Key Signing Keys (KSKs) are signed with the Secure Entry Point (SEP) bit set. As soon as possible, Afilias sends DS-record data pertaining to these KSKs for signed TLD zones to ICANN for publication in the root. No other trust anchors or repositories are used. 3. OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTS 3.1. Meaning of domain names Policies regarding restrictions on domain names within a given zone are specified by the registry operator, and vary from TLD to TLD. 3.2. Identification and authentication of child zone manager Registry Operators must first give express permission to Afilias to permit DNSSEC for child zones in a given TLD. Only registrars (on behalf of their registrants) are permitted to activate DNSSEC for a child zone. To activate DNSSEC, a registrar must submit a Delegation Signer (DS) record either via the Web Administration Tool, or via EPP (according to RFC 5910). For EPP, each registrar has unique credentials to access the TLD registry, which are verified before EPP transactions of any kind can be conducted. For the Web Administration Tool, certificates are used to uniquely identify each registrar. 3.3. Registration of delegation signer (DS) resource records Page 3 of 8

DS records are sent to the registry by the registrar via EPP (specifically, according to RFC 5910). Once submitted to the TLD registry, the WHOIS data is changed, and the zone changes are automatically propagated out to the DNS infrastructure. 3.4. Method to prove possession of private key It is the responsibility of the accredited registrar to ensure the integrity of the data submitted to Afilias. There is no requirement that a corresponding DNSKEY already be published in a zone before a DS record is submitted to the parent. This makes proof of possession of a private key unpredictable. Afilias therefore does not perform any tests to prove possession of a private key. 3.5. Removal of DS resource records 3.5.1. Who can request removal Only the sponsoring registrar for a domain name can add, change, or delete DS records for that domain name. Registrars must provide an Auth-Info code to verify any change for this domain name. 3.5.2. Procedure for removal request DS records are removed using the appropriate EPP command, as specified by RFC 5910. Only the Sponsoring Registrar can request a DS record be removed, and then only if they include the correct Auth-Info code. 3.5.3. Emergency removal request Because this is facilitated via EPP, and the system is updated continuously, there is no additional procedure required for an emergency removal request. 4. FACILITY, MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL CONTROLS 4.1. Physical Controls Afilias uses two geographically separate sites located in different countries that are not part of our offices. Both sites are physically protected environments that deter, prevent, and detect unauthorized use of, access to, and disclosure of sensitive information and systems. Both facilities limit access to authorized personnel. Visitors are only permitted by escort from Authorized personnel, and for a specific purpose (such as hardware repair by a technician). Both facilities provide redundant and backup power, air conditioning, and fire suppression and protection services. The sites provide redundant and backup DNSSEC services for each other. Reasonable precautions have been taken to minimize the impact of water exposure to Afilias systems. Media with sensitive information is stored within Afilias facilities with appropriate physical and logical access controls designed to limit access to authorized personnel. Sensitive documents, materials, and media are shredded or rendered unreadable before disposal. Afilias performs routine backups of critical system data and maintains an off-site backup with a bonded third party storage Page 4 of 8

facility. 4.2. Procedural Controls There are at least two operational teams with access to and responsibility for the signer systems. Each team member holds a part of the password necessary to grant access to the signer systems. Any task performed on a signer system requires an authorized representative from each team to be present. 4.3. Personnel Controls Afilias requires that all personnel taking part in a trusted role have to have been working for Afilias for at least one year and must have the qualifications necessary for the job role. Afilias provides training to all personnel upon hire as well as requisite training needed to perform job responsibilities. Refresher training and updates are provided as needed. Personnel and rotated and replaced as needed. In limited circumstances, contractors may be permitted to occupy a trusted role. Any such contractor is required to meet the same criteria applied to an Afilias employee in a comparable position. Afilias provides all employees with the materials and documentation necessary to perform their job responsibilities. 4.4. Audit Logging Procedures All key life cycle events, including but not limited to generation, activation, rollover, destruction, and use, whether successful or unsuccessful, are logged with a system that includes mechanisms to protect the log files from unauthorized viewing, modification, deletion, or other tampering. Access to physical facilities is logged by the facility and the log is only accessible to authorized personnel. Afilias monitors all log entries for alerts based on irregularities and incidents. The Afilias security team reviews all audit logs at least weekly for suspicious or unusual activity. 4.5. Compromise and Disaster Recovery In the event of a key compromise or disaster, Afilias incident response team would be notified. The response team has documented procedures for investigation, escalation, and response. The team is responsible for assessing the situation, developing an action plan, and implementing the action plan with approval from executive management. Afilias maintains redundant facilities to ensure immediate availability of a disaster recovery site should one site become unavailable. Key data is cloned, encrypted, and sent to a hot spare in the same facility, and to two spares in the redundant facility. The ability to encrypt and decrypt the key data resides entirely within each system's High Security Module, and exists nowhere external to the signing systems. Page 5 of 8

4.6. Entity termination Afilias has adopted a DNSSEC termination plan in the event that the roles and responsibilities of the signing services must transition to other entities. Afilias will coordinate with all required parties in order to execute the transition in a secure and transparent manner. 5. TECHNICAL SECURITY CONTROLS 5.1. Key Pair Generation and Installation All key pairs are generated on the signer systems according to parameters set by the operational team. The signer systems meet the requirements of FIPS 140-2 level 2. The public key is automatically inserted in the TLD zone file as a DNSKEY resource record as part of the signing process. A DS record is made available for submission to the parent (root) zone. The signer system maintains the separation of the KSK from the ZSK and manages the use of each key pair as appropriate. Each key is used for only one zone. 5.2. Private key protection and Cryptographic Module Engineering Controls All signing systems are FIPS 140-2 level 2 certified. No unencrypted access to the private key is permitted. Access to the signer system is specified in the Procedural and Personnel Control sections. Multiple redundant signing systems are maintained. The systems include a mechanism to backup key pairs and other operational parameters to each other in a secure manner. Private keys are not otherwise backed up, escrowed, or archived. When a private key is deactivated it is destroyed by the signing system. A trusted team has the authority to create, activate, and deactivate key pairs, and executes the responsibility according to documented policies and procedures. 5.3. Other Aspects of Key Pair Management 5.3.1. Public key archival Obsolete public keys are not archived. 5.3.2. Key Usage Periods Zone Signing Keys (ZSKs) are used in production for approximately one month before being rolled. Key Signing Keys (KSKs) are expected to be rolled every five years. 5.4. Activation Data Activation data is a set of passwords corresponding to a user accounts with key-generation privileges. The passwords are split to ensure that no single operator can perform these operations. 5.5. Computer Security Controls Afilias ensures that the systems maintaining key software and data files are trustworthy systems secure from unauthorized access. In addition, Afilias limits access to production servers to those individuals with a valid business reason for such access. General application users do not have accounts on production servers. 5.6. Network Security Controls The signing systems are placed in Afilias production systems, which are logically separated from all other systems. Use of normal network security mechanisms such as firewalls mitigate intrusion threats; only restricted role users are allowed access to production systems, and Page 6 of 8

their work is logged. 5.7. Timestamping The signer systems securely synchronize their system clocks with a trusted time source inside the Afilias network. 5.8. Life Cycle Technical Controls Applications developed and implemented by Afilias conform to its development and change management procedures. All software is traceable using version control systems. Software updates in production are part of a package update mechanism, controlled via restricted role access and updated via automated recipes. All updates and patches are subject to complete verification prior to deployment. Afilias uses a third-party solution on its signer systems, where updates are tested in a secure lab environment prior to deployment. 6. ZONE SIGNING 6.1. Key lengths, Key Types and algorithms 6.1.1 Key Signing Key Afilias uses a key length of 2048 bits with RSA as the generation algorithm. 6.1.2 Zone Signing Key Afilias uses a key length of 1024 bits with RSA as the generation algorithm. 6.2. Authenticated denial of existence Authenticated denial of existence will be provided through the use of NSEC3 records as specified in RFC 5155 [RFC5155]. 6.3. Signature format SHA-1 and SHA-256, using RSA 6.4. Key Rollover 6.4.1 Zone signing key roll-over Afilias will roll the ZSK with a pre-publishing scheme as described in RFC 4641, section 4.2.1.1. ZSK roll-over is carried out once a month. 6.4.2 Key signing key roll-over Afilias will roll the KSK with a double-signing scheme as described in RFC 4641, section 4.2.1.2. There are no planned KSK rollover frequencies defined at this time. 6.5. Signature life-time and re-signing frequency Zones are signed once every 8 or 9 days (4 times a month), with a signature life-time of 20 days. Jitter is introduced to avoid presumptive attacks during signing. 6.6. Verification of resource records All RRset signatures are verified prior to publication. 6.6.1 Verification of zone signing key set Verification of the zone signing key set is performed by validating the public key data contained in the Key Signing Record. 6.7. Resource records time-to-live DNSKey 15 minutes NSEC3 SOA minimum (24 hours) Delegation Signer (DS) 24 hours RRSIG varies depending on the RR covered 7. COMPLIANCE AUDIT 7.1. Frequency of entity compliance audit Compliance Audits are intended to be conducted at least biennially. 7.2. Identity/qualifications of auditor Page 7 of 8

The auditor will be an entity who is proficient in the technologies they are auditing, and are independent from Afilias. 7.3. Auditor's relationship to audited party Auditors must be independent to Afilias. 7.4. Topics covered by audit Environmental, network and software controls, operations, key management practices and operations. 7.5. Actions taken as a result of deficiency Any gaps identified in the audit will result in the creation of an action map, which lists what actions are necessary for the resolution of each gap. Management will design and implement mitigating steps to close the gaps identified. 7.6. Communication of results Afilias will publish results at http://www.afilias.info/dps. 8. LEGAL MATTERS This DPS is to be construed in accordance with and governed by the internal laws of Ireland without giving effect to any choice of law rule that would cause the application of the laws of any jurisdiction other than the internal laws of Ireland. The following material shall be considered confidential: - Private keys - Information necessary to retrieve/recover private keys - Disaster recovery plans (DRPs) - Any operational details relevant to the management and administration of DNS keys, including but not limited to network, software, hardware details. Afilias does not implicitly or explicitly provide any warranty, and has no legal responsibility for any procedure or function within this DPS. Afilias shall not be liable for any financial damages or losses arising from the use of keys, or any other liabilities. All legal questions or concerns should be sent to legal@afilias.info. Page 8 of 8