Study Data Reviewer s Guide. FDA/PhUSE Project Summary

Similar documents
Study Data Reviewer s Guide Completion Guideline

Sandra Minjoe, Accenture Life Sciences John Brega, PharmaStat. PharmaSUG Single Day Event San Francisco Bay Area

Beyond OpenCDISC: Using Define.xml Metadata to Ensure End-to-End Submission Integrity. John Brega Linda Collins PharmaStat LLC

Taming the SHREW. SDTM Heuristic Research and Evaluation Workshop

Introduction to Define.xml

Comparison of FDA and PMDA Requirements for Electronic Submission of Study Data

Optimizing the Use of Data Standards CSS Summary

Traceability Look for the source of your analysis results

Bay Area CDISC Network: PhUSE Working Group for Inspection Site Selection Data Standards

Study Data Reviewer s Guide

Improving Metadata Compliance and Assessing Quality Metrics with a Standards Library

Material covered in the Dec 2014 FDA Binding Guidances

Lex Jansen Octagon Research Solutions, Inc.

Creating Define-XML v2 with the SAS Clinical Standards Toolkit 1.6 Lex Jansen, SAS

PhUSE Paper SD09. "Overnight" Conversion to SDTM Datasets Ready for SDTM Submission Niels Mathiesen, mathiesen & mathiesen, Basel, Switzerland

Out-of-the-box %definexml

Reporting & Visualisation : D un Dun standard maison au format CDISC 02/02/2016 CDISC GUF 1

Pharmaceuticals, Health Care, and Life Sciences. An Approach to CDISC SDTM Implementation for Clinical Trials Data

CDISC SDTM and ADaM Real World Issues

OpenCDISC Validator 1.4 What s New?

CBER STUDY DATA STANDARDS UPDATE

Standards Driven Innovation

Preparing the Office of Scientific Investigations (OSI) Requests for Submissions to FDA

The Wonderful World of Define.xml.. Practical Uses Today. Mark Wheeldon, CEO, Formedix DC User Group, Washington, 9 th December 2008

PharmaSUG Paper PO22

What is high quality study metadata?

Dataset-XML - A New CDISC Standard

CDASH MODEL 1.0 AND CDASHIG 2.0. Kathleen Mellars Special Thanks to the CDASH Model and CDASHIG Teams

Standards Metadata Management (System)

Optimization of the traceability when applying an ADaM Parallel Conversion Method

Edwin Ponraj Thangarajan, PRA Health Sciences, Chennai, India Giri Balasubramanian, PRA Health Sciences, Chennai, India

Implementing CDISC Using SAS. Full book available for purchase here.

How to write ADaM specifications like a ninja.

PhUSE EU Connect 2018 SI05. Define ing the Future. Nicola Perry and Johan Schoeman

From Implementing CDISC Using SAS. Full book available for purchase here. About This Book... xi About The Authors... xvii Acknowledgments...

Introduction to ADaM and What s new in ADaM

Creating Define-XML version 2 including Analysis Results Metadata with the SAS Clinical Standards Toolkit

CDASH Standards and EDC CRF Library. Guang-liang Wang September 18, Q3 DCDISC Meeting

Leveraging Study Data Reviewer s Guide (SDRG) in Building FDA s Confidence in Sponsor s Submitted Datasets

Aquila's Lunch And Learn CDISC The FDA Data Standard. Disclosure Note 1/17/2014. Host: Josh Boutwell, MBA, RAC CEO Aquila Solutions, LLC

Standards Implementation: It Should be Simple Right? Thursday January 18, 2018

A SDTM Legacy Data Conversion

CDISC Standards and the Semantic Web

SAS Clinical Data Integration Server 2.1

Study Composer: a CRF design tool enabling the re-use of CDISC define.xml metadata

Voting Results. Kathie Clark, IQVIA, USA (Vendor) David Ives, Vertex, USA (BioPharma)* Russell Joyce, Heath Barrowcliff Consulting, UK (Consultant)*

Considerations on creation of SDTM datasets for extended studies

SAS Clinical Data Integration 2.4

SAS Clinical Data Integration 2.6

Boston, June 26 th 2018

Taming Rave: How to control data collection standards?

DIA 11234: CDER Data Standards Common Issues Document webinar questions

Get ready for ectd in South Africa. Current status at MCC

Managing CDISC version changes: how & when to implement? Presented by Lauren Shinaberry, Project Manager Business & Decision Life Sciences

PharmaSUG 2014 PO16. Category CDASH SDTM ADaM. Submission in standardized tabular form. Structure Flexible Rigid Flexible * No Yes Yes

The Submission Data File System Automating the Creation of CDISC SDTM and ADaM Datasets

Paper FC02. SDTM, Plus or Minus. Barry R. Cohen, Octagon Research Solutions, Wayne, PA

Step Up Your ADaM Compliance Game Ramesh Ayyappath & Graham Oakley

Tips on Creating a Strategy for a CDISC Submission Rajkumar Sharma, Nektar Therapeutics, San Francisco, CA

LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY RESEARCH OFFICE STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE. Loughborough University (LU) Research Office SOP 1027 LU

Customizing SAS Data Integration Studio to Generate CDISC Compliant SDTM 3.1 Domains

Paper DS07 PhUSE 2017 CDISC Transport Standards - A Glance. Giri Balasubramanian, PRA Health Sciences Edwin Ponraj Thangarajan, PRA Health Sciences

e-sens Nordic & Baltic Area Meeting Stockholm April 23rd 2013

Work to establish standard ENTSOE STAKEHOLDER COMMITTEE 1

Document Number: HITSP 08 N 378 Date: December 17, 2008 Report from the HITSP Education, Communication and Outreach (HITSP-ECO) Committee

Experience of electronic data submission via Gateway to PMDA

Streamline SDTM Development and QC

CDISC Journal. Generating a cabig Patient Study Calendar from a Study Design in ODM with Study Design Model Extension. By Jozef Aerts.

Semantic Technologies and CDISC Standards. Frederik Malfait, Information Architect, IMOS Consulting Scott Bahlavooni, Independent

Legacy to SDTM Conversion Workshop: Tools and Techniques

Helping The Define.xml User

SME License Order Working Group Update - Webinar #3 Call in number:

AUTOMATED CREATION OF SUBMISSION-READY ARTIFACTS SILAS MCKEE

User Guide 16-Mar-2018

ADaM Reviewer s Guide Interpretation and Implementation

SDTM Attribute Checking Tool Ellen Xiao, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ

The «CDISC Stupidario» (the CDISC Nonsense)

FedRAMP: Understanding Agency and Cloud Provider Responsibilities

PhUSE US Connect 2019

ODM The Operational Efficiency Model: Using ODM to Deliver Proven Cost and Time Savings in Study Set-up

Advantages of a real end-to-end approach with CDISC standards

CDISC Migra+on. PhUSE 2010 Berlin. 47 of the top 50 biopharmaceu+cal firms use Cytel sofware to design, simulate and analyze their clinical studies.

From SDTM to displays, through ADaM & Analyses Results Metadata, a flight on board METADATA Airlines

PMDA Valida+on Rules. Preparing for your next submission to Japanese Pharmaceu6cals and Medical Devices Agency. Max Kanevsky December 10, 2015

Challenges with the interpreta/on of CDISC - Who can we trust?

Best Practices for E2E DB build process and Efficiency on CDASH to SDTM data Tao Yang, FMD K&L, Nanjing, China

Next Steps for WHOIS Accuracy Global Domains Division. ICANN June 2015

DIRECTORS OF METHODOLOGY/IT DIRECTORS JOINT STEERING GROUP 18 NOVEMBER 2015

R1 Test Case that tests this Requirement Comments Manage Users User Role Management

Information Technology (CCHIT): Report on Activities and Progress

11 days Mon 12/7/15 Mon 12/21/15. 4 days Tue 12/8/15 Fri 12/11/ days Mon 1/4/16 Mon 2/29/16. External Milestone. Manual Summary Rollup Split

Converting Data to the SDTM Standard Using SAS Data Integration Studio

ADaM Compliance Starts with ADaM Specifications

Substance, Product, Organisation and Referential (SPOR) communication update

FDA Study Data Technical Conformance Guide v4.2

PhUSE Protocol Representation: The Forgotten CDISC Model

Harmonizing CDISC Data Standards across Companies: A Practical Overview with Examples

Session #2: CORSIA MRV System: Monitoring of CO 2 emissions The ICAO-Germany Small Scale Implementation Project

IEEE Backplane Ethernet Study Group Agenda and General Information. Vancouver, BC January 12, 2004

Catherine Hosage Norman, Ph.D., RAC. January 11, 2012

Transcription:

Study Data Reviewer s Guide FDA/PhUSE Project Summary

Agenda FDA/PhUSE Collaboration Overview Study Data Reviewer s Guide (SDRG) Project Summary

FDA/PhUSE Collaboration FDA Proclamation We the Masses Yearning for Answers

Paradigm Shift CRO FDA CDISC Pharma Vendor

Conferences/Meetings 2.0 A different kind of event Collaborative working meeting Initially defined working groups focused on general topics with projects Work does not stop when people go home continue the collaboration Work products, timelines, next steps

Working Group Structure Working Group Steering Committee Consists of 12 members from industry/fda including: liaison to WG Industry/FDA PM Project Reviewers Data Quality FDA Co-Leads Industry Co-Lead Steering Committee Liaison Optimizing Data Standards FDA Co-Leads Industry Co-Lead Steering Committee Liaison Standard Scripts FDA Co-Leads Industry Co-Lead Steering Committee Liaison Non-Clinical Roadmap FDA Co-Leads Industry Co-Lead Steering Committee Liaison Emerging Technologies FDA Co-Leads Industry Co-Lead Steering Committee Liaison Project s Project s Project s Project s Project s

Study Data Reviewer s Guide (SDRG) Purpose: Provide FDA Reviewers with additional context and single point of orientation for SDTM datasets submitted as part of ectd Module 5 Project: Standards implementation identified by 2012 FDA/PhUSE WG4 Work Package includes SDRG Template, SDRG Completion Guidelines, SDRG Examples

SDRG Work Package (WP) SDRG Template: Structured template designed to facilitate the consistent development of a SDRG SDRG Completion Guidelines: Set of instructions and partial examples designed to aid sponsors developing a SDRG from the template SDRG Examples: Complete SDRG examples developed by SDRG Team members using real-world SDTM data

SDRG Content Introduction: SDRG overview and standards inventory Protocol Description: Brief orientation to the study and additional context about the Trial Design Datasets Subject Data Descriptions: Additional context for subject-level datasets that are not adequately documented by define.xml

SDRG Content (Cont.) Data Conformance Summary: Inputs used to evaluate SDTM conformance and summary of conformance findings Appendix I: Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria: Full description of inclusion/exclusion criteria if criteria cannot be documented in TI due to SAS v5 limitations Appendix II: Conformance Issues Details Detailed record-level description of conformance issues Sponsors are strongly discouraged from including this section

SDRG Project Milestones 18-Mar-12: SDRG Kickoff at FDA/PhUSE CSS 01-Jun-Aug-12: Identification of SDRG content 21-Oct-12: SDRG Core Team F2F 15-Nov-12: 1 st draft of template and completion guidelines posted to PhUSE Wiki 18-Dec-12: Prequalification completed 25-Feb-13: Final WP released for WG4 review 18-Mar-13: v1 provided to FDA CSC

SDRG Project Challenges Building the plane while flying Narrowing broad working group focus to discrete projects Technical challenges with online collaboration tools Core Team day jobs Identifying and herding additional volunteers Purposeful Duplication Balancing duplication in the SDRG with other project documentation and single-point of orientation requirement Significant discussions occurred between FDA and industry regarding duplication with the protocol, clinical study report, define.xml, etc.

Next Steps Next Steps: CSC to pilot SDRG with sponsors Sponsors are welcomed, but NOT REQUIRED to use the SDRG Work Package to develop SDRGs for their SDTM submissions Analysis Data Reviewer s Guide kicked off at 2013 FDA/PhUSE CSS Additional volunteers are needed - join the team today!

Purpose: Analysis Data Reviewer s Guide (ADRG) Provide FDA Reviewers with additional context and single point of orientation for ADaM datasets submitted as part of ectd Module 5 Project: Analysis Data Reviewer s Guide (ADRG) project launched at 2013 FDA/PhUSE CSS

ADRG Preview Purpose: Provide FDA Reviewers with additional, human-readable documentation of analysis methods, datasets, and results that cannot be fully explained by ADaM metadata Project Leadership: Susan Kenny (Amgen), Gail Stoner (J&J), Mina Holen (FDA)

ADRG Project Tasks Define ADRG Scope Develop draft ADRG template and completion guidelines Vet draft documents Finalize draft ADRG template, completion guidelines and ADRG examples Release ADRG Work Package for public comment Finalize ADRG Work Package and release for use

Acknowledgements SDRG Core Team: Steve Wilson, FDA Helena Sviglin, FDA Douglas Warfield, FDA John Brega, Pharmastat Joanna Koft, Biogen-Idec Gail Stoner, Johnson & Johnson Scott Bahlavooni, Genentech David Brega, Pharmastat