MediaTek High Efficiency Video Coding

Similar documents
Upcoming Video Standards. Madhukar Budagavi, Ph.D. DSPS R&D Center, Dallas Texas Instruments Inc.

Homogeneous Transcoding of HEVC for bit rate reduction

NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION OR REPRODUCTION

High Efficiency Video Decoding on Multicore Processor

White paper: Video Coding A Timeline

Building an Area-optimized Multi-format Video Encoder IP. Tomi Jalonen VP Sales

Mark Kogan CTO Video Delivery Technologies Bluebird TV

High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) test model HM vs. HM- 16.6: objective and subjective performance analysis

High Efficiency Video Coding: The Next Gen Codec. Matthew Goldman Senior Vice President TV Compression Technology Ericsson

Higher compression efficiency, exceptional image quality, faster encoding time and lower costs

Full HD HEVC(H.265)/H.264 Hardware IPTV Encoder Model: MagicBox HD4 series MagicBox HD401: Single channel HDMI/AV, HDMI/VGA/YPbPr/AV, HDSDI input

COMPARISON OF HIGH EFFICIENCY VIDEO CODING (HEVC) PERFORMANCE WITH H.264 ADVANCED VIDEO CODING (AVC)

TotalCode Studio. Professional desktop encoding for digital distribution and over the top services NEW FEATURES

Emerging Markets for H.264 Video Encoding

A COMPARISON OF CABAC THROUGHPUT FOR HEVC/H.265 VS. AVC/H.264. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Texas Instruments

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R BT

HIKVISION H.265+ Encoding Technology. Halve Your Bandwidth and Storage Enjoy the Ultra HD and Fluency

Performance Comparison of HEVC and H.264/AVC Standards in Broadcasting Environments

International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering Website: (ISSN , Volume 2, Issue 4, April 2012)

The Dash for HEVC Nov 2012 Ittiam Systems Pvt Ltd Contact us at

STUDY AND IMPLEMENTATION OF VIDEO COMPRESSION STANDARDS (H.264/AVC, DIRAC)

CONTENT ADAPTIVE COMPLEXITY REDUCTION SCHEME FOR QUALITY/FIDELITY SCALABLE HEVC

HDMI/HD-SDI HEVC/H.264 IPTV

Tech Note - 05 Surveillance Systems that Work! Calculating Recorded Volume Disk Space

Integrating Beamr Video Into a Video Encoding Workflow By: Jan Ozer

Megapixel Networking 101. Why Megapixel?

OVERVIEW OF IEEE 1857 VIDEO CODING STANDARD

A Dedicated Hardware Solution for the HEVC Interpolation Unit

ZEN / ZEN Vision Series Video Encoding Guidelines

The Performance of MANET Routing Protocols for Scalable Video Communication

Professor, CSE Department, Nirma University, Ahmedabad, India

Enhancing the World of 4K in the Home by Expanding 4K Product Lineup and Enriching 4K Content Environment

Parallelism In Video Streaming

Updates in MPEG-4 AVC (H.264) Standard to Improve Picture Quality and Usability

ACCELERATING HEVC ADOPTION

XAVCTM. Specification Overview. Revision 2 Sep. 13 th, 2013 First Edition Nov. 1 st, 2012

Axis Zipstream technology

Comparative and performance analysis of HEVC and H.264 Intra frame coding and JPEG2000

A comparison of CABAC throughput for HEVC/H.265 VS. AVC/H.264

3 September, 2015 Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation NTT Advanced Technology Corporation

Video Quality for Live Adaptive Bit-Rate Streaming: Achieving Consistency and Efficiency

IEEE 1857 Standard Empowering Smart Video Surveillance Systems

Analysis of Motion Estimation Algorithm in HEVC

Vector Bank Based Multimedia Codec System-on-a-Chip (SoC) Design

Broadcast-Quality, High-Density HEVC Encoding with AMD EPYC Processors

Mali GPU acceleration of HEVC and VP9 Decoder

One-to-Many (Interactive Broadcast)

LINEAR VIDEO DELIVERY FROM THE CLOUD. A New Paradigm for 24/7 Broadcasting WHITE PAPER

HDMI/HD-SDI/VGA H.264/H.256 HEVC

Mobile Data Trends and Networks Fit for Purpose

Camera to NVR Ratio for Recording

NEW CAVLC ENCODING ALGORITHM FOR LOSSLESS INTRA CODING IN H.264/AVC. Jin Heo, Seung-Hwan Kim, and Yo-Sung Ho

Digital Media Capabilities of the Modero X Series Touch Panels

Development of mixed screen content coding technology: SCC-HEVC extensions framework

Testing HEVC model HM on objective and subjective way

Homogeneous Transcoding of HEVC

MAGIX Software GmbH CHALLENGES CASE STUDY

Fast Decision of Block size, Prediction Mode and Intra Block for H.264 Intra Prediction EE Gaurav Hansda

Advanced Video Coding: The new H.264 video compression standard

Video & Vision: New IP, New Standards, New Solutions

A Study on Transmission System for Realistic Media Effect Representation

Exaflood Optics 1018

High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC)

An Adaptive Video Compression Technique for Resource Constraint Systems

Cisco Visual Networking Index (VNI) Global IP Traffic Forecast Update;

Using M-Link H.264 over BGAN Video delivery from Livewire Digital Ltd

Image and Video Coding I: Fundamentals

A LOW-COMPLEXITY AND LOSSLESS REFERENCE FRAME ENCODER ALGORITHM FOR VIDEO CODING

Reducing/eliminating visual artifacts in HEVC by the deblocking filter.

Chapter 3 Information and Communication Technology (ICT) and EEE Consumption Trends

Introduction. White Paper H.265 High Efficiency Coding Video Compression for Security Applications

Performance Comparison between DWT-based and DCT-based Encoders

THE VALUE OF SOCIAL MEDIA

EXCELLENCE IN AUDIO AND MEDIA ENGINEERING

HIGH PERFORMANCE VIDEO CODECS

Transcoding from H.264/AVC to High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC)

A COST-EFFICIENT RESIDUAL PREDICTION VLSI ARCHITECTURE FOR H.264/AVC SCALABLE EXTENSION

2010 Intel Core processor family (Intel Core i3/i5/i7)

H.264 High Profile: Codec for Broadcast & Professional Video Application

Image and video processing

A Quantized Transform-Domain Motion Estimation Technique for H.264 Secondary SP-frames

HDTV: concatenated compression EBU test results Credits to the EBU projects P/HDTP (M.Visca, RAI) and D/HDC (R.Schaefer, IRT) and their Members

Bi-directional optical flow for future video codec

Analysis of Information Hiding Techniques in HEVC.

Efficient Parallel Architecture for a Real-time UHD Scalable HEVC Encoder

ITU-T. FS-VDSL White Paper. Full-Service VDSL. Focus Group White Paper. Required ONU/OLT Bandwidth capacity for Video Services

Georgios Tziritas Computer Science Department

MiraVision Picture Quality Enhancement Technology for Displays MediaTek White Paper January 2015

WHITE PAPER. An explanation of video compression techniques.

An Efficient Mode Selection Algorithm for H.264

The Case for Content-Adaptive Optimization

STACK ROBUST FINE GRANULARITY SCALABLE VIDEO CODING

Entering the Zettabyte Era

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MPEG-4 AND H.264 VIDEO COMPRESSION STANDARDS

HEVC The Next Generation Video Coding. 1 ELEG5502 Video Coding Technology

TotalCode Enterprise is an ideal solution for video-on-demand content preparation for any screen anywhere.

The Democratization of Media Transformation Socionext America Inc.

ADAPTIVE STREAMING. Improve Retention for Live Content. Copyright (415)

A Hardware Solution for the HEVC Fractional Motion Estimation Interpolation

ABSTRACT 1. INTRODUCTION 2. RELATED WORK

Transcription:

MediaTek High Efficiency Video Coding MediaTek White Paper October 2014 MediaTek has pioneered the HEVC in mobile devices and will do the same for TVs by enabling HEVC in 4K TVs in during 2015. MediaTek provided the first hardware-based 4Kx2K HEVC encoder and decoder, a hardware-based implementation that consumes much less power, allowing for longer battery life in portable devices. 2014 MediaTek Inc.

Introduction Video compression has been commonplace for more than two decades. And the rise of cloud services, smartphones, tablet computers, and social media has transformed the way in which this video is created and consumed. These days TV programming and movies are consumed on demand over the internet through a multitude of services and content providers, and are often watched on smartphones and tablets, as well as TV. Even when watched on TV the content is frequently downloaded to a smartphone or tablet and then streamed to a smart TV within the home. Video is not just streamed or downloaded from various content providers. Many consumers share their memories with family and friends by uploading videos to social media sites directly from their personal mobile devices. And commercial enterprises are also making greater use of video for traditional and social marketing, conferencing and training. Whether watching video programming or sharing memories, consumers demand ever higher quality reproduction, and have an expectation to receive this higher quality. The increased use of video-transmitting bandwidth exceeds that of non-video traffic and the demand for this bandwidth is ever increasing. Meeting these demands are the challenges we address in the next generation of video coding standards. There is a need to record higher resolution video, compress it more, maintain high quality reproduction, and be able to both compress and decompress not just on high performance computers or purpose-built media devices, but also on tablets and smartphones costing the consumer hundreds of dollars. Trends H.264/Advanced Video Coding (AVC), initially developed in the period 1999-2003 and then extended from 2003-2009, allowed for significantly better compression performance than prior video coding standards (H.261, MPEG-1, H.262/MPEG-2, H.263, MPEG-4). H.264 enabled a wide range of digital video applications, including high definition (HD) TV broadcast, video acquisition and editing systems, camcorders, remote video surveillance applications, Internet video streaming, mobile network video, Blu-ray discs, and real-time video communication systems such as videoconferencing and videophones. Today 2014 MediaTek Inc. 2

H.264/AVC allows mainstream video resolution of these applications to increase from CIF (352x288) 15-30fps and SDTV (720x480x30fps or 720x576x25fps) to HD720p (1280x720x30fps) and full HD (1920x1080x30fps). Current projections are that mainstream video resolution will exceed current HD formats (e.g., 4K 2K and 8K 4K resolutions at 60-120fps) as the demand for higher video quality increases. Problem Today the industry faces two significant interrelated challenges, both the result of dramatically increased traffic demands: bandwidth transmission problems and coding insufficiencies evident in H.264. In a recent IEEE report on HEVC, researchers noted consumer driven increased desire to higher quality and resolutions in mobile applications. i By 2018 a projected 60% increase in video traffic on global networks is projected. Cisco and Ericsson anticipate significant increases in global IP traffic: In 2016 global IP traffic: one zettabyte (1,000 exabytes) per year, 91.3 exabytes per month In 2018 global IP traffic: 1.6 zettabytes per year, 131.9 exabytes per month. Globally, IP video traffic will constitute 79% of all business and consumer IP traffic by 2018, up from 66% in 2013. This percentage does not include the amount of video exchanged through peer-to-peer (P2P) file sharing. The sum of all forms of video (TV, video on demand, Internet, and P2P) will continue to be in the range of 80 to 90 percent of global consumer traffic by 2018. Solution MediaTek was one of the primary contributors in a multi-year international development and the 2013 adoption of the HEVC/H.265 standard. ii The basic framework of this H.265/HEVC standard is the same as prior standards block-based motion compensated transform coding. However, all H.265/HEVC building blocks have adopted advanced techniques that show significant technical improvements. Benefits H.265/HEVC can achieve significantly higher compression performance than prior video coding standards. IEEE researchers iii report impressive bit-rate savings, as shown in the table below. 2014 MediaTek Inc. 3

Bit-Rate Savings Relative to Encoding H.264/MPEG-4 H.263 MPEG-4 MPEG-2 AVC HP CHC ASP H.262 MP HEVC MP 40.3% 67.9% 72.3% 80..1% H.264/MPEG-4 AVC HP - 46.8% 54.1% 67.% H.263 CHC - - 1.3.2% 37.4% MPEG-4 ASP - - - 27.8% HEVC compression performance verification testing shows the average bit-rate savings of H.265/HEVC. With comparable subjective visual quality of H.264/AVC testing shows a savings of 52%, 56%, 62%, and 64% for 480p, 720p, 1080p, and ultra HD. Complexity was reasonably well controlled during the H.265/HEVC standardization. The H.265/HEVC decoder complexity is similar to that of H.264/AVC, while H.265/HEVC encoders are several times more complex than H.264/AVC encoders. iv 2014 MediaTek Inc. 4

Real World Usage Examples The most obvious examples for the use of the new standards are in the consumption of TV and movie content. Three particular examples stand out: On demand streaming from the provider to a smart TV either directly or via a tablet or smartphone. In this case the consumer is looking for the best possible video experience with the minimum bandwidth consumption and the decoding is carried out on relatively low cost low power devices Live streaming of events such as sports both to the home and to tablets and smartphones at the optimum resolution of the devices in use. In this case supporting a range of resolutions and bit rates to suite the different device capabilities both screen resolution and network bandwidth Downloading of content for later viewing offline on tablets and smartphones. Here it is necessary to provide the best possible video experience while using a minimum of the device storage capacity The second growing area of use is the use of video in social interactions in social media and consumerized video calling Instant video sharing on social networks utilizing smartphone or tablet to upload and publish small segments of video at acceptable resolution with a minimum overhead on processing power and network bandwidth. Live personal video calls and conferences are an increasingly common way for families to stay in touch from afar. The better the video quality the more it feels like the family is together sharing every day experiences. Finally there is enterprise usage: Video conferencing from the desktop, smartphone, and tablets Video-based training and events both live and recorded for on demand consumption Traditional and social media-based marketing Conclusion This new standard allows for improved ultra high definition resolutions while minimizing the bandwidth needs. The well-controlled HEVC complexity is expected to enable its use in the wide range of consumer devices including cameras, smart TV, tablets, and smartphones, as well as the more traditional consumer and professional video devices. 2014 MediaTek Inc. 5

During the HEVC standardization process MediaTek was recognized for our considerable technical contributions to improving compression performance and reducing complexity. MediaTek s hardware-based implementation consumes much less power hence longer battery life in portable devices can be achieved. MediaTek pioneered the HEVC in mobile devices and will do the same for TVs by enabling HEVC in 4K TVs in during 2015. References i J.-R. Ohm, G. J. Sullivan, H. Schwarz, T. K. Tan, T. Wiegand, Comparison of the Coding Efficiency of Video Coding Standards Including High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC), IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, December 2012. ii The standard was finalized in January 2013 by the Joint Collaboration Team on Video Coding (JCT-VC) of ITU-T SG16 WP3 (known as VCEG Video Coding Experts Group) and ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11 (known as MPEG Moving Picture Experts Group), and extensions of HEVC (range, scalable, 3-D, and screen content coding extensions) are being developed. In ITU-T, HEVC is named H.265. In MPEG, HEVC is named MPEG-H Part 2 (ISO/IEC 23008-2). MediaTek provided considerable contributions and was recognized as one of the leading companies in JCT-VC. We submitted more than 200 technical proposals and more than 100 crosscheck reports. More than 50 of our technical proposals were adopted into HEVC v1. If HEVC extensions are also counted, these numbers would be more than doubled. iii J.-R. Ohm, G. J. Sullivan, H. Schwarz, T. K. Tan, T. Wiegand, Comparison of the Coding Efficiency of Video Coding Standards Including High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC), IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, December 2012. iv F. Bossen, B. Bross, K. Sühring, D. Flynn, HEVC Complexity and Implementation Analysis, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, December 2012. 2014 MediaTek Inc. 6