Next Steps for WHOIS Accuracy Global Domains Division. ICANN June 2015

Similar documents
WHOIS Accuracy Reporting System (ARS): Phase 2 Cycle 1 Results Webinar 12 January ICANN GDD Operations NORC at the University of Chicago

WHOIS Accuracy Reporting: Phase 1

WHOIS Accuracy Reporting System (ARS)

General Update Contractual Compliance Initiatives and Improvements Audit Program Update Complaints Handling and Enforcement Summary

WHOIS Accuracy Reporting System (ARS)

Contractual Compliance Update. Contractual Compliance ICANN 57 5 November 2016

Registrar Session ICANN Contractual Compliance

Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers Contractual Compliance Update

RDAP Implementation. Francisco Arias & Gustavo Lozano 21 October 2015

General Update Contractual Compliance Initiatives and Improvements Audit Program Update Complaints Handling and Enforcement Summary

Update on ICANN Domain Name Registrant Work

Intellectual Property Constituency (IPC)

ICANN Contractual Compliance. ALAC Mee(ng. Sunday, 23 March 2014 #ICANN49

ICANN Contractual Compliance. IPC Mee(ng. Tuesday, 25 March 2014 #ICANN49

2011 Whois Data Reminder Policy Audit Report

Pilot Study for the WHOIS Accuracy Reporting System: Preliminary Findings

Registrar Stakeholder Mee2ng Tuesday, 25 March 2014

Contractual Compliance

TRANSMITTED VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL, FACSIMILE, AND COURIER

Program Update. Contractual Compliance ICANN March 2017

Contractual Compliance Update ICANN 52 February 2015

Privacy and Proxy Service Provider Accreditation. ICANN58 Working Meeting 11 March 2017

TRANSMITTED VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL, FACSIMILE, AND COURIER RE: NOTICE OF BREACH OF REGISTRAR ACCREDITATION AGREEMENT

Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers Contractual Compliance Update

Contractual ICANN. An Overview for Newcomers 11 March 2012

Contractual Compliance Update. Contractual Compliance ICANN October 2015

TRANSMITTED VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL, FACSIMILE, AND COURIER

Contractual Compliance. Registry Stakeholder Group March 2012

Improving WHOIS- An Update. 20 November, 2013

All Things WHOIS: Now and in the Future

TRANSMITTED VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL, FACSIMILE, AND COURIER RE: NOTICE OF BREACH OF REGISTRAR ACCREDITATION AGREEMENT

W H O I S A C C U R A C Y R E P O R T I N G S Y S T E M

EVALUATION OF INTERNET CORPORATION OF ASSIGNED NAMES AND NUMBERS (ICANN) COMPLIANCE PROCESSES. Garth Bruen

TRANSMITTED VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL, FACSIMILE, AND COURIER RE: NOTICE OF BREACH OF REGISTRAR ACCREDITATION AGREEMENT

Report on Registrar Whois Data Reminder Policy Survey

TRANSMITTED VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL, FACSIMILE, AND COURIER

TRANSMITTED VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL, FACSIMILE, AND COURIER

TRANSMITTED VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL, FACSIMILE, AND COURIER

General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)

Contractual Compliance Update ICANN June 2015

TRANSMITTED VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL, FACSIMILE, AND COURIER RE: NOTICE OF BREACH OF REGISTRAR ACCREDITATION AGREEMENT

Introduction. Prepared by: ICANN Org Published on: 12 January 2018

TRANSMITTED VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL, FACSIMILE AND COURIER RE: NOTICE OF BREACH OF REGISTRAR ACCREDITATION AGREEMENT

Compliance Outreach Wednesday, 26 March 2014

Registrar Outreach. Contractual Compliance ICANN June 2015

TRANSMITTED VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL, FACSIMILE, AND COURIER

IGO/INGO Identifiers Protection Policy Implementation. Meeting with the IRT 9 March 2016

RDAP Implementation. 7 March 2016 Francisco Arias & Gustavo Lozano ICANN 55 7 March 2016

SME License Order Working Group Update - Webinar #3 Call in number:

Contractual Compliance Update. Registrar Stakeholder Meeting. 16 October 2012

TRANSMITTED VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL, FACSIMILE, AND COURIER RE: NOTICE OF BREACH OF REGISTRAR ACCREDITATION AGREEMENT

WHOIS Review Team Internationalized Registration Data Expert Working Group. Margie Milam ICANN October 2015

TRANSMITTED VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL, FACSIMILE, AND COURIER RE: NOTICE OF BREACH OF REGISTRAR ACCREDITATION AGREEMENT

TRANSMITTED VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL, FACSIMILE, AND COURIER RE: NOTICE OF TERMINATION OF REGISTRAR ACCREDITATION AGREEMENT

Contractual Compliance Semi-Annual Report July Table of Contents

Letter from the Vice President of Contractual Compliance

Advisory Statement: Temporary Specification for gtld Registration Data

TRANSMITTED VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL, FACSIMILE, AND COURIER RE: NOTICE OF BREACH OF REGISTRAR ACCREDITATION AGREEMENT

Contractual Compliance Update. Contractual Compliance ICANN 55 9 March 2016

TRANSMITTED VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL, FACSIMILE, AND COURIER RE: NOTICE OF BREACH OF REGISTRAR ACCREDITATION AGREEMENT

TRANSMITTED VIA FACSIMILE, ELECTRONIC MAIL AND COURIER RE: NOTICE OF BREACH OF REGISTRAR ACCREDITATION AGREEMENT

Outreach Program 20 November 2013

Undergraduate Admission File

New Concept for Article 36 Networking and Management of the List

Contractual Compliance 2014 Annual Report. Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers

TRANSMITTED VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL, FACSIMILE AND COURIER

Council, 26 March Information Technology Report. Executive summary and recommendations. Introduction

REPORT ON TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE QUALITY WINDSTREAM FLORIDA, INC.

Topic LE /GAC position Registrar Position Agreement in Principle 1. Privacy and Proxy services

CBERS-2. Attitude Control and its Effects on Image Geometric Correction. Follow up to TCM-06 INPE CBERS TEAM

North American Portability Management, LLC Transition Oversight Manager. TOEP Webcast December 12, 2017

TRANSMITTED VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL, FACSIMILE AND COURIER RE: NOTICE OF TERMINATION OF REGISTRAR ACCREDITATION AGREEMENT

Contractual Compliance Semi Annual Report February 2009

TRANSMITTED VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL, FACSIMILE, AND COURIER RE: NOTICE OF BREACH OF REGISTRAR ACCREDITATION AGREEMENT

Contractual Compliance. Text. IPC Meeting. Tuesday, 24 June 2014 #ICANN50

Interim Report Technical Support for Integrated Library Systems Comparison of Open Source and Proprietary Software

North American Portability Management, LLC Transition Oversight Manager. TOEP Webcast November 7, 2017

TRANSMITTED VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL, FACSIMILE, AND COURIER RE: NOTICE OF BREACH OF REGISTRAR ACCREDITATION AGREEMENT

Draft Thick RDDS (Whois) Consensus Policy and Implementation Notes

CIMA Asia. Interactive Timetable Live Online

TRANSMITTED VIA FACSIMILE, COURIER SERVICE & ELECTRONIC MAIL RE: NOTICE OF TERMINATION OF REGISTRAR ACCREDITATION AGREEMENT

Stakeholder consultation process and online consultation platform

TRANSMITTED VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL, FACSIMILE, AND COURIER

TRANSMITTED VIA FACSIMILE, ELECTRONIC MAIL AND COURIER RE: NOTICE OF BREACH OF REGISTRAR ACCREDITATION AGREEMENT

TRANSMITTED VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL, FACSIMILE, AND COURIER

Council, 8 February 2017 Information Technology Report Executive summary and recommendations

Contractual Compliance Registrars Outreach With focus on AP March 27, 2014

Overview of ITU capacity building activities

Proposed Final Report on the Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery Policy Development Process Executive Summary

Progress Report Negotiations on the Registrar Accreditation Agreement Status as of 1 March 2012

IRTP Part A PDP Final Report. Thursday 16 April 2009 GNSO Council Meeting

ICANN's Whois Data Accuracy and Availability Program: Description of Prior Efforts and New Compliance Initiatives. 27 April 2007

Current status and next steps. Haileyesus Getahun Coordinator IACG Secretariat World Health Organization

ISO/IEC JTC 1 Special Working Group on Accessibility (SWG-A)

TRANSMITTED VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL, FACSIMILE, AND COURIER RE: NOTICE OF BREACH OF REGISTRAR ACCREDITATION AGREEMENT

Law Enforcement Recommended RAA Amendments and ICANN Due Diligence Detailed Version

WHOIS Accuracy Study Findings, Public Comments, and Discussion

TRANSMITTED VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL, FACSIMILE, AND COURIER RE: NOTICE OF BREACH OF REGISTRAR ACCREDITATION AGREEMENT

Contact Information Redacted. Contact Information Redacted

CIMA Asia. Interactive Timetable Live Online

Transcription:

Next Steps for WHOIS Accuracy Global Domains Division ICANN 53 24 June 2015

Agenda: Next Steps for WHOIS Accuracy Reporting System 1 2 3 Introduction and Implementation Approach Pilot Project and Lessons Learned Phase 1 Status 4 5 6 Phase 2 Status and Compliance Q & A 2

Introduction

Background and Goals WHOIS activities at ICANN Policy, Implementation, Technical Where does fit? Major implementation initiative 2012 WHOIS RT and GAC Advice Key objective: systematically improve accuracy Multi-phase project Public reports Compliance component And now for the detail. 4

Background and Goals Mandate The Board directed the CEO to establish a project to: Proactively identify inaccurate gtld registration data, exploring the use of automated tools Forward potentially inaccurate records to registrars for action Publicly report on the resulting actions to encourage improvement Objective Identify and report in a way to improve quality of the data in the WHOIS 5

Phased Implementation of Project NOW 0 1 2 Pilot: Proof of Concept Tested processes for data collection and validation. Completed March 2015 Phase 1: Syntax Validation Is the record correctly formatted? Target Report: August 2015 Phase 2: Operational Validation Does the email go through, phone ring, mail deliver? Target Report: December 2015 3 Phase 3: Identity Validation, TBD, if at all: Is the contacted individual responsible for the domain? 6

Utilizing a Cross-Functional Team!"#$$%&'()% *++%,-./#&!,$0% ",$&/#"&1#2%",3-2!#$".% /.*!0&/#/%0./4!".0% 2.*#2%!&%5%-/,+1"&% 3#$#*.3.$&% $,/"% :;!<0.% +!*!"./&% 1-1% 4'6789%&'()% Accuracy Reports 7

ARS Project Approach Identify sample records Collect WHOIS records for sample Select subsample for accuracy testing Perform accuracy testing Analyze results & produce report Compliance follow up with registrars 8

Roadmap for Phases 1 & 2 1Q 15 2Q 15 3Q 15 4Q 15 1Q 16 2Q 16 3Q 16 4Q 16 1Q 17 2Q 17 Pilot Public Comment Phase 1 Phase 2 Report Publication!! Pilot is complete!! Phase 1 Syntax Report on track for publication in August 2015!! Phase 2 Operational report, expected in December 2015! Followed by new Phase 2 reports each six months 9

Lessons Learned from the Pilot

Opportunities for Improvement from the Pilot Pilot was successful as a proof of concept. Two major areas of learning:!"#$%"#&'! Align to RAA! Respect effective date! Registrant, Tech & Admin contacts (%)*"+,-'! Statistical significance! Reasons for inaccuracy! Actionable data 11

Phase 1 Syntactic Accuracy

Phase 1 - Building on Lessons Learned from Pilot Registrar Accreditation Agreement Requirements Phone Email Postal!! Criteria posted to Knowledge Center on: whois.icann.org Syntactic Accuracy Range (0-9) 13

ARS Phase 1 Report Expectations Accuracy Statistics by Segment 95% confidence intervals, +/- 5% margin of error Reporting syntactic accuracy for the following segments: The gtld space, by region and in total New gtlds compared to prior (legacy) gtlds 2013 RAA records compared to 2009 RAA records Compliance will be provided report of all inaccurate records for registrar follow up Summary Report will Focus on Why Records are Inaccurate Understanding the errors can enable: Registrar improvements Registrant updates / corrections Community to consider improvement initiatives based on data 14

Phase 1 On Track for Publication in Mid-August NOW Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Lessons Learned & Vendor Coordination Accuracy Criteria Refinement Data Collection Accuracy Testing Data Analysis & Report Development Report Publication!! Phase 1 Criteria published to: Knowledge Center on whois.icann.org!! Accuracy Testing of 10k records underway, expected completion in early July 2015!! Planning a webinar in August 2015 after publication to explain results 15

Phase 1 Demographics At Time of Sample Records in gtlds Prior TLDs New gtlds 2013 RAA Registrar 100k Sample 157M 96.85% 3.15% +95%* AFR LAC EUR APAC N.A. 2009 RAA GF 2013 RAA 2013 RAA New gtlds Prior gtlds.07% 3% 23% 24% 49% 3% 51% 46% 25% 75% 10k Sub-sample AFR LAC EUR APAC N.A. 2009 RAA GF 2013 RAA 2013 RAA New gtlds Prior gtlds 7% 18% 19% 21% 35% 18% 44% 38% 20% 80% * Majority of these are grandfathered 2013 RAA records, record created prior to effective date of 2013 RAA 16

Phase 2 Operational Accuracy

Phase 2 Operational Accuracy Phase 2 = Syntax + Operability Examples of operability tests: Email: Does the email go through / not bounced back? Phone: Does the number ring when dialed? Postal: Is the address deliverable? Phase 2 Criteria Aligned to RAA Obligations Contact information in the WHOIS must be accurate Working standard is used for intended purpose, i.e. contactable Lessons learned from Phase 1 will be incorporated & criteria updated for Phase 2 18

Phase 2 Implementation Plan $,:% Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Accuracy Criteria Refinement Data Collection Accuracy Testing Data Analysis & Report Development Report Publication 19

and Compliance

Compliance Pilot Goal of Compliance Pilot: Test the proof of concept: Use data to generate and forward WHOIS inaccuracy and WHOIS format complaints to registrars. Summary of Events from January April 2015: Telephone and email inaccuracy reports sent to contractual compliance Conducted initial review and validation of the data and collaboration with the ICANN and vendors. Uploaded the data into the complaint processing system. Began processing complaints. Stopped processing to address data issues based on registrar feedback. Resumed complaint processing. Closed complaints in system if data was incomplete or did not meet the contractual criteria. 21

Compliance Pilot Overview Complaint volume and outcome 10,510 complaints tickets created 71 tickets sent to registrars 10,439 closed before sending to Registrars (see below) Top Closure Resolve Codes: Incomplete (9941) Domain not registered (337) Domain suspended or canceled (208) Complaint inconsistent with current WHOIS (12) Data changed (9) Registrar verified correct (8) Note: some complaints are closed with mul+ple closure codes; total will not equal to 10,510 22

Compliance Pilot (continued) Lessons Learned Inaccuracy criteria used for the sampling was not aligned with RAA/ICANN process: Cross-team collaborated to align on test criteria. Phase 1 Validation Criteria published at: http://whois.icann.org/sites/default/files/files/whois-ars-phase-1- validation-criteria-01jun15-en.pdf Ensure future reports are complete. Large complaint ticket influx burdened the complaint processing system. Separate data files from vendors caused inefficiency and duplication. Request to consolidate the reports and where appropriate all identified inaccuracies for a domain are placed in one record. 23

WHOIS Accuracy Reporting System Enforcing Contractual Obligations Registrars must investigate and correct inaccurate WHOIS data per: Section 3.7.8 of 2009 and 2013 RAA and WHOIS Accuracy Program Specification of 2013 RAA. Registrars under 2013 RAA must use WHOIS format and layout required by Registration Data Directory Service (WHOIS) Specification. WHOIS inaccuracy and WHOIS format complaints created from data will follow the Contractual Compliance Approach and Process as published at: https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/approach-processes-2012-02-25-en. Failure to respond or demonstrate compliance during complaint processing will result in a Notice of Breach (and publication of notice on icann.org). ICANN will continue to give priority to complaints submitted by community members. 24

Community Input Processes Registrar Advisory Panel Topics Accuracy criteria (which were also published) Method/mechanism for delivering inaccurate WHOIS records to registrars Method/mechanism for registrar reporting to ICANN Compliance on actions taken Public Comment Outcomes / metrics Compliance enforcement process and results General feedback Could lead to formation of advisory group, depending on issue complexity or contentiousness. 25

Summary 1 Phased approach to ARS implementation. 2 Phase 1 Syntax on track for report in August 2015. 3 Phase 2 Operational Kicking off in Q2 2015. Report in December 2015. 4 Compliance to follow up with Registrars. Questions? 3 26