Supplementary information

Similar documents
Case Study - Vierendeel Frame Part of Chapter 12 from: MacLeod I A (2005) Modern Structural Analysis, ICE Publishing

E and. L q. AE q L AE L. q L

Beams. Lesson Objectives:

CITY AND GUILDS 9210 UNIT 135 MECHANICS OF SOLIDS Level 6 TUTORIAL 15 - FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS - PART 1

Introduction. Section 3: Structural Analysis Concepts - Review

Example Lecture 12: The Stiffness Method Prismatic Beams. Consider again the two span beam previously discussed and determine

CE2302 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS I Important Questions PART B

ANALYSIS OF PLANE FRAME STRUCTURE WITH MATLAB AND SAP2000 PROGRAMS

Tutorial 1: Welded Frame - Problem Description

THREE DIMENSIONAL ACES MODELS FOR BRIDGES

Finite Element Analysis Dr. B. N. Rao Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Madras. Module - 01 Lecture - 15

Problem 1. Lab #12 Solution

Slope Deflection Method

CE371 Structural Analysis II Lecture 5:

INFLUENCE OF CURVATURE ILLUMINATION WAVEFRONT IN QUANTITATIVE SHEAROGRAPHY NDT MEASUREMENT

Challenge Problem 5 - The Solution Dynamic Characteristics of a Truss Structure

Non-Linear Analysis of Bolted Flush End-Plate Steel Beam-to-Column Connection Nur Ashikin Latip, Redzuan Abdulla

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS - II

3D Coordinate Transformation Calculations. Space Truss Member

PLAXIS 2D - SUBMERGED CONSTRUCTION OF AN EXCAVATION

SUBMERGED CONSTRUCTION OF AN EXCAVATION

This is NOT a truss, this is a frame, consisting of beam elements. This changes several things

Strength of Overlapping Multi-Planar KK Joints in CHS Sections

Chapter 3 Analysis of Original Steel Post

Investigation of the behaviour of single span reinforced concrete historic bridges by using the finite element method

Finite Element Method. Chapter 7. Practical considerations in FEM modeling

8. Plastic Analysis. 8.1 Introduction. Figure 8.1

ANALYSIS OF BOX CULVERT - COST OPTIMIZATION FOR DIFFERENT ASPECT RATIOS OF CELL

UNIT III KANI S METHOD

Calculation of initial pretension for a cable-stayed bridge using Cable Force Tuning function in midas Civil

1.2 Connection configurations:

Scientific Manual FEM-Design 17.0

= Set the units Click on the units icon, and change the default units to lbs and inches for:

MAE 323: Lecture 6. Modeling Topics: Part I. Modeling Topics Alex Grishin MAE 323 Lecture 6 FE Modeling Topics: Part 1

Application nr. 2 (Global Analysis) Effects of deformed geometry of the structures. Structural stability of frames. Sway frames and non-sway frames.

Supplementary Information. Design of Hierarchical Structures for Synchronized Deformations

Supplementary Material: The Rotation Matrix

= 21

Settlement of a circular silo foundation

SAP2000. Linear and Nonlinear Static and Dynamic Analysis and Design of Three-Dimensional Structures BASIC ANALYSIS REFERENCE

BEARING CAPACITY OF CIRCULAR FOOTING

CE Advanced Structural Analysis. Lab 1 Introduction to SAP2000

Guidelines for proper use of Plate elements

Building the Graphics Memory of. the Stiffness Matrix of the Beam

Bridge Software Institute 2

d has a relationship with ψ

ASSIGNMENT 1 INTRODUCTION TO CAD

RISA 3D. Verification Problems. Rapid Interactive Structural Analysis 3 Dimensional

Vibration Analysis of Welded Tubular Structures Considering Local Joint Flexibility

Interference. Electric fields from two different sources at a single location add together. The same is true for magnetic fields at a single location.

Analysis of Composite Aerospace Structures Finite Elements Professor Kelly

D DAVID PUBLISHING. Stability Analysis of Tubular Steel Shores. 1. Introduction

CHAPTER 4. Numerical Models. descriptions of the boundary conditions, element types, validation, and the force

CE2351-STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS II

SCIA stands for scientific analyser. The C in SCIA Engineering is not pronounced. Note that the first c in science is not pronounced either.

SAP 2000 Problem II Homework Problem P5.45. Recall from Lab #6 the Global and Local Reference Coordinate Systems for 2D Problems

Behaviour of cold bent glass plates during the shaping process

UNIT-I ENERGY METHODS & INDETERMINATE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Use of S-Frame and S-Steel

ORBIS MODERN ROLLING-ELEMENT BEARING ANALYSIS SOFTWARE

ixcube 4-10 Brief introduction for membrane and cable systems.

An introduction to understanding the deflection of beams using the Push Me Pull Me models on Expedition Workshed

[3] Rigid Body Analysis

WP1 NUMERICAL BENCHMARK INVESTIGATION

Optimization of Arch Supported Tensile Roofs

Finite Element Specialists and Engineering Consultants

Multiframe May 2010 Release Note

The Generate toolbar has convenient tools to create typical structural shapes.

FLAP P6.2 Rays and geometrical optics COPYRIGHT 1998 THE OPEN UNIVERSITY S570 V1.1

Module 1: Introduction to Finite Element Analysis. Lecture 4: Steps in Finite Element Analysis

3 METHODS FOR TRUSS ANALYSIS

Coordinate transformations. 5554: Packet 8 1

UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA SARAWAK FACULTY OF ENGINEERING CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

SAMCEF for ROTORS. Chapter 3.2: Rotor modeling. This document is the property of SAMTECH S.A. MEF A, Page 1

The diagram above shows a sketch of the curve C with parametric equations

Chapter 7 Practical Considerations in Modeling. Chapter 7 Practical Considerations in Modeling

Development of Backhoe Machine By 3-D Modelling using CAD Software and Verify the Structural Design By using Finite Element Method

OP-029. INTERPRETATION OF CIU TEST

EngiLab Beam.2D User Manual

Membrane structure in the form of Moebius strip

MODELING AND ANALYSIS OF LATTICE TOWERS WITH MORE ACCURATE MODELS

Quantifying Three-Dimensional Deformations of Migrating Fibroblasts

Laminates can be classified according to the fiber orientation.

MEAM 550 Modeling and Design of MEMS Spring Solution to homework #3. In our notation and values, k = = =

Math 7 Elementary Linear Algebra PLOTS and ROTATIONS

Frame Analysis Using Multiframe4D

17. SEISMIC ANALYSIS MODELING TO SATISFY BUILDING CODES

Modeling Foundations in RS

1. Carlos A. Felippa, Introduction to Finite Element Methods,

Preliminary remarks. Preliminary remarks. Preliminary remarks. CHAPTER 7 BM Analysis using Stiffness Method

MAE Advanced Computer Aided Design. 01. Introduction Doc 02. Introduction to the FINITE ELEMENT METHOD


SAFI Sample Projects. Design of a Steel Structure. SAFI Quality Software Inc. 3393, chemin Sainte-Foy Ste-Foy, Quebec, G1X 1S7 Canada

Solve the problem described in the figure below for the joint action of Ε y, E x

OPENSEES Soil-Pile Interaction Study under Lateral Spread Loading

Internal Forces and Moments

ME Optimization of a Frame

DD2429 Computational Photography :00-19:00

CHAPTER 40 CARTESIAN AND POLAR COORDINATES

Finite Element Model for Axial Stiffness of Metal-Plate-Connected Tension Splice Wood Truss Joint

Transcription:

Modern Structural Analysis - Introduction to Modelling Supplementary information Chapter 3 Section 5.10 Equivalent beam for parallel chord trusses The cross references in the form n.m or n.m.p are to sub-sections in Modern Structural Analysis - Introduction to Modelling. The cross references with a single number are to items within this document. Case study 1 - Checking for a plane parallel chord truss Purpose The purpose of this study is to investigate: an example of the use of the equivalent beam checking for a plane parallel chord truss - Section 5.10 the behaviour of a truss of this type Truss configuration Figure 1 shows a plane truss with parallel chords fabricated from circular hollow sections (CHS). 1000 1000 Chord members: 168.3 x 5 CHS Diagonal members: 88.9 x 5 CHS (a) Truss 1 2 1 2 4 3 6 6 7 8 8 4 9 9 5 10 11 11 50 kn (b) Analysis Figure 1 In-plane parallel chord truss Element Figure 1(b) shows the 2D element. Model types Two types of are considered: 1

Beam element which includes axial, bending (but not shear) deformation. Full moment connections at all joints Bar element which includes only axial deformation of the members Element Properties - see Table 1 Table 1 Element properties Member Area (mm 2 ) I value (mm 4 ) E (kn/mm 2 ) Chords 2570 8.56E+08 209 Diagonals 1320 1.16E+06 209 The supports are: Node 1 - restrained in global x and y directions; no rotational restraints Nodes 6 - restrained in the vertical direction only. Loading 50 kn vertical checking load at the centre of the span applied at the lower chord level. Calculate the central deflection in the line of the applied load - - using the equivalent beam of Section 5.10.4 For a definition of symbols see Section 5.10.4. The equivalent beam is shown in Figure 2 I g, k st W = 50 kn L = 0 Figure 2 Equivalent beam Section properties for the equivalent truss For I g use Equation (5.17) I g = A c b 2 = 2570*^2/2 = 1.157E8 mm 4 For the shear stiffness K st use Equation (5.19) ( there are no posts) θ = tan -1 (/500) = 0.5404 K st = fe d A d sin 2 θcosθ = 1.0*1320*209*sin(0.5404)^2*cos(0.5404) =62617 kn/rad Central deflection of the equivalent beam = b + s (Equation 5.5) = WL 3 /(48EI e ) + WL/(4K st ) (From Table A4) = 50*0^3/(48*209*1.157E8) + 50*0/(4*62617) = 1.163 + 0.5989 = 1.762 mm 2

Comparison of values of central deflection with element results Table 2 compares the results for central deflection for the equivalent beam, the beam element and the bar element. Table 2 Comparison of values 1 2 3 4 5 Displacement Equivalent Beam %diff Bar %diff beam element (1-2)/2*100 element (1-4)/4*100 b - axial, chords 1.164 0.814 42.88 1.228-5.26 s - axial, diagonals 0.599 0.382 56.70 0.599 0.01 m - bending 0.278 1.762 1.475 19.49 1.827-3.54 Note: b is the contribution of the axial deformation of the chords to the central deflection. For the equivalent beam this is the central deflection due to bending mode deformation. s is the contribution of the axial deformation of the diagonals to the central deflection. For the equivalent beam this is the central deflection due to shear mode deformation. m is the contribution to from the moments in the beam element i.e. from bending in the elements of the beam element. Calculate the contribution of axial and bending deformation in the beam element using the principle of virtual work Table 3 shows the calculation of the contributions to from axial deformation in the beam element. The columns of Table 3 represent: N a - the actual axial forces in the elements from the LUSAS output N v - the virtual forces in the elements due to a unit point load in the direction of the required displacement. In this case the required displacement is in the line of the applied load and is therefore the N a column divided by 50. For displacements in an other direction a separate load case with a unit load in that direction would be required to establish the N v column. A and L are the areas and the lengths of the members respectively. Table 3 Virtual work calculation of the deformation of the beam element element N a N v A L N a N v L/(EA) chords diagonals 1-38.03-0.7606 2570 1000 0.0539 2-98.88-1.9776 2570 1000 0.3641 3-38.03-0.7606 2570 1000 0.0539 4 67.83 1.3566 2570 1000 0.1713 5 67.83 1.3566 2570 1000 0.1713 6 44.14 0.8828 1320 583.10 0.0824 7-34.64-0.6928 1320 583.10 0.0507 3

8 37.04 0.7408 1320 583.10 0.0580 9 37.04 0.7408 1320 583.10 0.0580 10-34.64-0.6928 1320 583.10 0.0507 11 44.14 0.8828 1320 583.10 0.0824 Sum 0.8144 0.3822 The sums of the last two columns in the table give the contributions to of the chord and the diagonal elements of the. The contribution of bending deformation - m = 1.475-0.814-0.382 = 0.278 mm) is the difference between the total deflection and the sum of these two axial components Calculate the contribution of chords and the diagonals in the bar element The same process as for the beam element was repeated for the bar element to calculate the contributions of the axial deformations of the chords and of the diagonals to The results are quoted in Table 3 (calculation not shown here). Analysis of the results in Table 3 The following trends are identified: The dominant contribution to is the axial deformation of the chords. The bending deformation of the elements has the least effect but it is not negligible in the beam element. The equivalent beam significantly overestimates the central deflection by 19% as compared with the beam element results due to the fact that it does not take account of the bending of the elements. The equivalent beam gives very good correlation with the results from the bar element in this case. Estimate the values of the axial forces in the members of the frame See last part of Section 5.10.4 Table 4 Axial forces in the plane truss 1 2 3 4 5 Axial force Equivalent beam Beam element %diff (1-2)/2*100 Bar element %diff (1-4)/4*100 N c Top chord 125.0 98.87 26.4 125.0 0.0 N c Bottom chord 125.0 67.83 84.3 83.33 50.01 N d End diagonal 48.59 41.76 16.4 48.59 0.0 Chord members For the equivalent beam the axial forces in the chords are calculated using: N c = M/b where: 4

N c is the axial force in a chord member at the position where M is calculated M is the (central) bending moment in the equivalent beam. b is the distance between the chord members For the axial force at the centre of the span N c = M/b = WL/4/b = 50*0/4/ =125.0 kn Table 4 compares this result with the values from the beam and bar element s. End diagonal members The axial force in the end diagonal is estimated by resolving the forces at the support - Figure 9. Vertical equilibrium gives 25.0 = N d sin(θ) hence N d = 25.0/sin(0.5404) = 48.59 kn 25.0 θ N d Figure 3 Forces at support This result is also included in Table 3. Analysis of the results of Table 3 The following trends are identified: The top chord axial force from the equivalent beam (125.0) correlates precisely with that from the bar element but the bottom cord axial forces are lower because of the diagonals that connect to it at the loaded node. The top chord value for the beam element is significantly less due to the bending stiffness of the elements. The end diagonal forces from the equivalent beam and the bar element precisely correlate. The effect of element bending on the end diagonal axial force is less pronounced. General conclusions The results of this case study indicate the type of correlation that can be achieved in using the equivalent beam. It is recommended that these results are not extrapolated to other truss configurations without cross checking against element results. 5

Case study 2 - Checking for a parallel chord truss with a triangular cross section The purpose of this study is to investigate an example of the use of the equivalent beam checking for a 3D parallel chord truss. Truss configuration Figure 4 shows a 3D truss with parallel chords fabricated from circular hollow sections (CHS). The configuration is similar to the plane truss of Case study 1 but there are two top chord members forming a triangular cross section for the system. (a) Elevation 600 600 φ 1000 1000 1000 (b) Plan at top level of truss (diagonals and lower chord members not shown) Figure 4 3D Truss (c) Cross section For plan showing diagonals and lower chords see Figure Element s Figure 5 shows the 3D element. Beam and bar element s were used as for the truss of Case Study 1 The element properties are the same as for the truss of Case Study 1 (Table 1) Y 1 X 4 Z 5 1 26 28 25 52 11 8 13 14 2 12 19 18 19 23 7 6 7 29 27 38 30 9 15 16 10 17 23 20 21 22 24 26 50.0 kn Figure 5 Analysis for 3D truss 4 11 10 6

The supports are: Nodes 1 and 8 - restrained in global x,y and z direction; no rotational restraints Nodes 6 and 13 - restrained in the vertical direction only. Loading 50 kn vertical checking load at the centre of the span applied at the lower chord level Calculate the central deflection in the line of the applied load - - using the equivalent beam of Section 5.10.4 For a definition of symbols see Section 5.10.4. Centroidal axis 600 A c = 2570 mm 2 100 y = 200 φ b p Figure 6 Cross section of equivalent beam Equivalent I value I g Figure 6 shows the cross section for the equivalent beam. The three chord member areas form a 'section' for which the second moment of area is calculated by identifying the position of the centroidal axis of the section and taking second moments of area of the chord members about this axis. Position of centroidal axis. Take moments of area about the lower chord member: 3A c y = 2A c i.e. y = 2*/3 = 200 mm where: A c is the area of a chord member y is the distance from the lower chord to centroidal axis The second moment of are is therefore: I g = A c 200 2 + 2 A c 100 2 = 2570*200^2 + 2*2570*100^2 = 1.542E8 mm 4 Shear stiffness - K st To calculate the vertical shear stiffness of the truss, the shear stiffness in the inclined plane of the diagonals (i.e. the planar stiffness) is calculated and the vertical component of this is calculated (by a cos 2 (φ) transformation - see table A5) and then doubled to account for the two inclined planes. The inclined planar trusses are oriented at an angle φ to the vertical - Figure 6. The angle φ = tan -1 (/) = 0.7854 radians Depth of a planar truss - b p = sqrt(^2 + ^2) = 424.3 mm The θ angle for a planar truss (Figure 7) - θ p = tan -1 (424.26/500) = 0.7036 radians 7

θ p 424.26 500 Figure 7 Angle θ p The shear stiffness for a planar truss K st,p is calculated using Equation (5.19): K st,p = fe d A d sin 2 θ p cosθ p = 1.0*209*1320*sin(0.70360)^2*cos(0.7036) = 88051 kn/rad The vertical component of the shear stiffness for the system is: K st = 2 K st,p cos 2 (φ) = 2*88051*cos(0.7854)^2 =88051 kn/rad Value of = b + s (Equation (5.5)) = WL 3 /(48EI e ) + WL /(4 K st ) Table A4 = 50*0^3/(48*209*1.5428E8) + 50*0/(4*88051) = 0.872 + 0.426 = 1.298 mm In Table 5 this value is compared with the corresponding results from the beam element and the bar element s Table 5 Comparison of values Parameter 1 2 3 4 5 Beam %diff Bar element (1-2)/2*100 element Equivalent beam %diff (1-4)/2*100 Deflection 1.298 1.019 27.38 1.231 5.4 N c Top chord 62.5 46.2 35.28 49.10 27.3 Axial force N c Bottom chord 125 65.06 92.13 83.33 50.01 N d End diagonal 27.32 24.3 12.43 27.32 0.0 49.10 Analysis of the results for deflection in Table 5 The equivalent beam gives good correlation against the bar element results but is less accurate with the beam element where bending deformation is not negligible. Estimate the values of the axial forces in the members of the frame Chord members 8

Treating the section of Figure 6 as that of a beam, the axial stress in the bottom chord member - σ cb - is: σ cb = My/I e = M*200/I g M = WL/4 = 50*0/4 = 37500 kn mm hence σ cb = 37500*200/1.542E8 = 0.04864 kn/mm 2 The axial force in the bottom chord is therefore: N cb = σ cb A c = 0.04864*2570 = 125.0 kn The axial force a top chord member is: N ct = σ ct A c = MyA c I e = 37500*100/1.542E8*2570 = 62.50 kn where σ ct is the axial stress in the top chord member End diagonal member Vertical equilibrium at a support node: R = N d cosλ where: R is the reaction at the support = 12.5 kn N d is the axial force in the diagonal member λ is the angle between the axis of the diagonal member at the support (e.g element 14 in Figure 5) and the vertical axis - See Figure 8 cosλ = projection of diagonal member on the vertical axis true length of the diagonal member Length of diagonal member = sqrt(^2 + ^2 + 500^2) =655.74 mm cosλ = /655.74 = 0.4575 hence N d = R /cosλ = 12.5/0.4575 = 27.32 kn The results for the three s are given in Table 5 500 Element 14 A 655.74 λ Element 14 (a) Plan of showing the diagonal elements Figure 8 Definition of angle λ (b) View on A Analysis of the results for axial forces in Table 5 The equivalent beam significantly overestimates the axial forces as compared with the beam element. This is mainly due to the effect of element bending. The correlation between the equivalent beam results and the bar element results is good apart from that for the bottom chord. This is due to the effect of the diagonals meeting at the bottom central node. 9

A correlation with the bar element for the bottom chord axial force is achieved by taking moments about the axis at 'a' on the free-body diagram of Figure 9. (a) Applying the condition of equilibrium gives: 25.0*100 = n b * hence n b = 25.0*1000/0 = 83.33 This is the same as the value from the bar element 10