County of Sacramento

Similar documents
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA BOARD OF SUPERVISORS POLICY. ELECTRONIC MEDIA AND USE POLICY A-50 1 of 9

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO

SPRING-FORD AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT

Records Information Management

Records Retention Policy

Policy Summary: This guidance outlines ACAOM s policy and procedures for managing documents. Table of Contents

Cellular Site Simulator Usage and Privacy

UTAH VALLEY UNIVERSITY Policies and Procedures

RECORDS AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT AND RETENTION

WHEATON COLLEGE RETENTION POLICY May 16, 2013

Management: A Guide For Harvard Administrators

Policies & Regulations

COMPUTER & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CENTER. Information Transfer Policy

Memorandum ITS FOIL

4.2 Electronic Mail Policy

Order F19-04 OFFICE OF THE PREMIER. Celia Francis Adjudicator. January 29, 2019

Frequently Asked Questions Related to The Arkansas General Records Retention Schedule

Florida Supervisor of Elections Conference May 22, 2018 Patricia R. Gleason Special Counsel for Open Government Attorney General Pam Bondi

POLICY TITLE: Record Retention and Destruction POLICY NO: 277 PAGE 1 of 6

Department of Veterans Affairs VA DIRECTIVE April 17, 2006 WEB PAGE PRIVACY POLICY

Office of Presidential Libraries; Proposed Disposal of George H.W. Bush and Clinton. Agency: National Archives and Records Administration (NARA)

DIRECTIVE ON RECORDS AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT (RIM) January 12, 2018

POLICY AND PROCEDURE Electronic Mail Retention Guidelines

Farmingdale State College Records Management Training PRESENTED BY DOROTHY HUGHES INTERNAL CONTROL OFFICER AND RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER

ADOPTED STANDARDS/POLICIES. Information Technology Security Policy

8/28/2017. What Is a Federal Record? What is Records Management?

University Policies and Procedures ELECTRONIC MAIL POLICY

Supersedes Policy previously approved by TBM

Version Date Author Revision(s)/Edit(s) V3.0 12/8/2010 Marland Webb V4.0 03/18/15 Marland Webb Update procedures and links

Records Management - Part 1. Records Retention Folders

RECORD RETENTION POLICY

Subject: University Information Technology Resource Security Policy: OUTDATED

Records Management at MSU. Hillary Gatlin University Archives and Historical Collections January 27, 2017

POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

CARROLL COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS BOARD POLICY EHB: DATA/RECORDS RETENTION. I. Purpose

RECORDS MANAGEMENT AND YOU

Community Unit School District No. 1. School Board

University Information Technology Data Backup and Recovery Policy

RECORDS MANAGEMENT RECORDS MANAGEMENT SERVICES

Table of Contents 6.1 CORRESPONDENCE

5/6/2013. Creating and preserving records that contain adequate and proper documentation of the organization.

NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION. Office of Presidential Libraries; Disposal of Presidential Records

RECORDS WWU: . WWU Archives & Records Management Tony Kurtz x3124 Rachel Thompson x6654

Best Practices for Organizing Electronic Records

Library and Archives Canada. Generic Application Guide for the Disposition Authorization for Transitory Records (DA 2016/001)

North American Market for Electronic Content Archiving

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY RECORDS MANAGEMENT HANDBOOK

ALAMEDA COUNTY GRAND JURY FINAL REPORT

9/30/2014. Oregon Public Risk Manager s Conference October Retention and Public Records Requests. Facts

SUBJECT: Effective Date: Policy Number: Florida Public Records Act: Scope and

UTAH VALLEY UNIVERSITY Policies and Procedures

Record Retention Policies: How Long Do We Keep This Record? Pari J. Swift, CRM, Senior Records Manager

Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy (FOIPOP)

RPost's Registered services and Evidence issues within the United Kingdom Legal System

NEWTON COUNTY OPEN RECORDS ACT POLICY

Managing and Electronic Records: A Transition Priority

Southington Public Schools

UCOP Guidelines for Protection of Electronic Personal Information Data and for Security Breach Notification

The Trail of Electrons

Records Retention 101 for Maryland Clerks

Information Security Incident Response Plan

Information Security Data Classification Procedure

\\amr-web04\inetpub\wwwroot\new.nascio.org\portals\0\awards\nominations2003\2003\2003northdakota1.docpage 1 of 6

Cisco Unity Connection uses separate databases to store the system configuration and the information in voic s.

New York Department of Financial Services Cybersecurity Regulation Compliance and Certification Deadlines

EDRMS Document Migration Guideline

Ashford Board of Education Ashford, Connecticut POLICY REGARDING RETENTION OF ELECTRONIC RECORDS AND INFORMATION

Washington State Archives Public Records Management for Conservation Districts

Office of Inspector General Office of Professional Practice Services

Roche Directive on the Use of Roche Electronic Communication Tools

Springfield, Illinois Police Department

Records Management and Retention

DAOS - IBM Lotus Domino Attachment and Object Service

Clearing Out Legacy Electronic Records

UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON SYSTEM ADMINISTRATIVE MEMORANDUM. SECTION: Information Technology NUMBER: 07.A.07

PCI Compliance and records management

TRICARE Operations Manual M, April 1, 2015 Records Management (RM) Chapter 9 Section 1

Rules governing staff access to and use of Parliament's system

GOVERNMENT OF ONTARIO COMMON RECORDS SERIES TRANSITORY RECORDS

CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER BOARD OF STANDARDS, INC. ANONYMOUS CASE HISTORIES NUMBER 30648

UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST INFORMATION SECURITY POLICY October 25, 2017

Information Security Incident Response Plan

Recordkeeping Metadata Study Committee

APPENDIX TWO RETENTION AND DISPOSAL SCHEDULE IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES

POLICYAND PROCEDURE INDEX. Number Rev. I Effective Date n.,ge 1 of: I B. 1 IA /6/07

Credit Card Data Compromise: Incident Response Plan

Kunal Mahajan Microsoft Corporation

Electricity Sub-Sector Coordinating Council Charter FINAL DISCUSSION DRAFT 7/9/2013

Professional Engineers Ontario. canada s anti-spam. Guidelines for Chapters

The date when this policy is posted to the online Company Policy Manual and communicated to all business lines: December 14, 2012

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure IT Obligations For

Virginia State University Policies Manual. Title: Information Security Program Policy: 6110

MNsure Privacy Program Strategic Plan FY

1997 Minna Laws Chap. February 1, The Honorable Jesse Ventura Governor 130 State Capitol Building

UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST INFORMATION SECURITY POLICY September 20, 2017

MAPP Update

The Data Protection Act 1998 Clare Hall Data Protection Policy

Archiving Service Reports Guide

Publications. ACH Audit Requirements. A new approach to payments advising SM. Sound Practices Checklists

Record Keeping Best Practice. Distinguish between University and Non-University Records

Transcription:

Chief Information Officer Patrick Groff County Executive Terry Schutten County of Sacramento DATE: January 30, 2008 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Agency Administrators and Department Directors Patrick Groff, Chief Information Officer Unified Messaging Retention Policy On October 4, 2007 the Information Technology Policy Board (ITPB) recommended approval of the referenced Unified Messaging Retention Policy for the County of Sacramento. The Unified Messaging Retention Policy updates the policy formerly known as the E-Mail Retention Policy. This new policy includes other data message types (voice messages and faxes) that unified messaging and VoIP can integrate into a user s e-mail inbox. The purpose of this policy is to provide guidance for the following: Backup tapes will be retained for six months. Backup tapes are kept primarily for disaster recovery purposes and are not to be relied upon for retention of records. E-mails that are public records are to be retained in a manner determined by the responsible department for a period of time consistent with the retention period for such records. This policy applies to: Data messages: voice messages, faxes, emails that unified messaging and Voice over IP integrate into a user s email box. The Technology Review Group (TRG) recommended approval of the referenced Unified Messaging Retention Policy on September 18, 2007. This policy is effective immediately. You can view an electronic version of the policy on the County Internet site at: http://inside.saccounty.net/sites/itpb/standards-policies/docs/um-retention-combined.pdf If you have any questions or need more information, contact me at 874-7825 or by e-mail at groffp@saccounty.net. Concurrence: Terry Schutten County Executive Cc: Technology Review Group, Communications & Media Officers 799 G Street Suite 709 Sacramento, California 95814 phone (916) 874-7825 fax (916) 874-9077 www.saccounty.net

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO Inter-Departmental Correspondence For the agenda of: October 4, 2007 TO: FROM: Information Technology Policy Board Members Jeff Leveroni, Chair Technology Review Group SUBJECT: Update to the E-mail Retention Policy 1. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Unified Messaging Retention Policy, formerly known as the E-mail Retention Policy, documented in attachment A. 2. BACKGROUND: Recently, the Technology Review Group held discussions with County Counsel to determine how the (January 2007) change in Federal rules relating to E- Discovery would affect new or existing County technology implementations. After review, a determination was made that the existing E-Mail Retention Policy required modification to include technologies that are now part of our e-mail infrastructure as a result of the convergence of the County s voice and data networks. 3. DISCUSSION: In March 2002, the ITPB approved the strategic direction of a converged voice and data network infrastructure (Voice over Internet Protocol, or VoIP) and unified messaging for Sacramento County. As a result, data or message types not traditionally associated with common e-mail usage may be routinely stored in a users e-mail inbox, including voice messages and fax messages. County Counsel has advised that when an employee is using VoIP and voicemail is integrated with that individuals e-mail inbox, voicemail and faxes are part of the e-mail infrastructure and must be covered in our E-Mail Retention policy. The - 1 -

Technology Review Group recommends modifying the E-Mail Retention policy to be consistent with County Counsel s advice. 4. IMPACT OF IMPLEMENTING THIS RECOMMENDATION: Implementation of this policy update will ensure that retention of electronic data related to the County s unified messaging system is handled in a consistent manner Countywide. Also, the ability to specify criteria for electronically searching stored voicemail and faxes is limited. During an E-Discovery process, voicemail may require translation and faxes may need to be reviewed, both of which are labor-intensive activities. - 2 -

ATTACHMENT A UNIFIED MESSAGING RETENTION POLICY October 2007 (Formerly E-Mail Retention Policy) Electronic Mail: Generally, messages sent to a users mailbox are temporary communications which are non-vital and should be discarded routinely. However, depending on the content of the message, it may be considered public record. Accordingly, employees have the same responsibilities for their mailbox messages as they do for any other public record, and must distinguish between records and non-record information. Back-up: Electronic mail should be considered a communication tool, not a storage mechanism. Back-up tapes are for disaster recovery purpose only. However, the County does access backup tapes periodically to restore data. Retention is the responsibility of the sender of the message, not the back-up process. Back-up copies performed by Information Technology staff are not records retention. Back-up tapes should be retained no more than six months. Legal Proceedings: Regardless of retention requirements, electronic mail and all other electronic or paper documents pertaining to threatened or actual legal proceedings must be retained until the litigation is finally concluded pursuant to the County s litigation hold policy. Retention of Record Electronic Mail: The definition of public records includes any writing containing information relating to the conduct of the public s business prepared, owned, used or retained by the County. The definition includes electronic records, including e-mail, voicemail or fax messages sent to the same mailbox. The definition does not include preliminary drafts, notes, or interagency or intra-agency memoranda that are not retained by the County in the ordinary course of business. Personal correspondence and interdepartmental and intradepartmental messages should routinely be deleted unless either the sender or the recipient would have retained the writing had it been sent in any other form. Messages received from outside the County should be retained by the recipient if he or she would have retained the document if it had been sent in any other form. Responsibility for Retention: The sender of the message, regardless of message type, is responsible for ensuring proper retention of messages sent within the County. All other copies are duplicates and may be deleted. However, if a record message was sent by an outside agency, a member of the public or anyone outside the County, the recipient is responsible for retention. - 3 -

Method of Retention: Message records that have not met their retention period should be saved by one of the following methods: Print the e-mail or e-mail based fax and store the hard copy in the appropriate file. E-mail based voice messages cannot be printed, other than the subject line of the message. Electronically store the message in an Exchange shared public folder, or move it out of the e-mail system and store it on a shared network drive. Note: When there is doubt about the ability to retrieve an electronic record over its life span, the record should be printed and maintained in a hard copy format. Voice messages may be saved to a shared network drive. Each department shall select the method of retention for that department. Retention Period for Record Messages: E-mail, e-mail based voicemail and e- mail based faxes sent to the same mailbox are themselves not considered a record series or category; it is a means of transmission of messages or information. Retention or disposition of these messages must be related to the information they contain or the purpose they serve. Thus, the retention period is determined by the content of the message, not the medium. Record messages may be deleted upon expiration of the statutory retention period (or after two years if there is no statutory retention period) upon authorization of the Board of Supervisors pursuant to Government Code section 26202. When in doubt about the legally appropriate retention period, consult the County Counsel s Office. Electronic Message Attachments: Attachments should be retained or disposed of according to the content of the attachment itself, not the message which transmits the attachment. Thus, attachments should be retained if they constitute a document which the recipient or the sender would ordinarily retain in the course of business. - 4 -