Requirements for 5G Fronthaul

Similar documents
DAY 2. HSPA Systems Architecture and Protocols

LTE-Advanced Relay. Oct 18, 2011

LTE Radio Interface Architecture. Sherif A. Elgohari

IMPACT OF 5G RAN ARCHITECTURE IN TRANSPORT

Split Options for 5G Radio Access Networks. Paul Arnold, Nico Bayer, Jakob Belschner, Gerd Zimmermann Technology Innovation Deutsche Telekom AG

5G: an IP Engineer Perspective

Graph-based Framework for Flexible Baseband Function Splitting and Placement in C-RAN

Virtual Evolved Packet Core (VEPC) Placement in the Metro Core- Backhual-Aggregation Ring BY ABHISHEK GUPTA FRIDAY GROUP MEETING OCTOBER 20, 2017

Challenges in Data-Center Technologies for Distributed Radio Signal Processing. Raymond Knopp EURECOM, Communication Systems Department

Common Public Radio Interface

IEEE 1914 NGFI (xhaul): efficient and scalable fronthaul transport for 5G

xran and C-RAN Integration in M-CORD

The Open-Source SDR LTE Platform for First Responders. Software Radio Systems

5G Core Network Standardization

Acropolis Winter School on OAI4G LTE 2012

Dual Connectivity in LTE

The Impact of 5G Air Interfaces on Converged Fronthaul/Backhaul. Jens Bartelt TU Dresden / 5G-XHaul

Overview and requirements

Common Public Radio Interface

Mobile Network Evolution Part 2

ITSF - TIMING FOR 5G SYNCHRONISATION REQUIREMENTS FOR 5G

OpenAirInterface promoting the development, distribution and adoption of the opesource hardware and software wireless technology platforms

TTCN3 in Wireless Testing Eco Space

Long Term Evolution - Evolved Packet Core S1 Interface Conformance Test Plan

FlexCRAN: A Flexible Functional Split Framework over Ethernet Fronthaul in Cloud-RAN

Benefits and challenges of cloud technologies for 5G architecture

System Architecture Evolution

King s Research Portal

LTE RAN Operation (ARI0001) Course Outline

awaves academy EPS/LTE Training Program In cooperation with GreenlightPM and TheSpecTool TheSpecTool

MME SGW PGW. 17-Feb-14 21:15 (Page 1) This sequence diagram was generated with EventStudio Sytem Designer -

RAN slicing as enabler for low latency services

Evolution of OAI Software towards 5G NR Raymond Knopp Communication Systems Department EURECOM

Small Data over NAS, S11-U and SGi Interfaces

INTRODUCING THE 5G-PPP 5G-XHAUL PROJECT

Tektronix LTE Test Solution Next Technology Wave for Mobile Networks

Architecture and Protocols of EPC-LTE with relay

SON/RRM Functionality for Mobility Load Balancing in LTE Networks

Frequency domain IQ. Richard Maiden - Intel

Summary of WP5 Integration and Validation Second Year. FP7 ICT Objective 1.1 The Network of the Future

LTE Radio Interface Architecture

AL-FEC for Streaming Services over LTE Systems

Converged Ethernet for Next- Generation x-haul

POWER-ON AND POWER-OFF PROCEDURES

Error resilient packet switched H.264 video telephony over third generation networks

NGFI packet format for various functional splits

LTE system performance optimization by RED based PDCP buffer management

IT Certification Exams Provider! Weofferfreeupdateserviceforoneyear! h ps://

3GPP LTE-WLAN Aggregation 發展現況. Jing-Rong Hsieh, HTC

ETSI TS V ( )

Flexible Ethernet Fronthaul. Philippos Assimakopoulos Communications Research Group, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK

The path toward C-RAN and V-RAN: benefits and challenges from operator perspective

1.1 Beyond 3G systems

Load Tester v11.2 Release Notes - Page 1 of 16 -

Virtual Mobile Core Placement for Metro Area BY ABHISHEK GUPTA FRIDAY GROUP MEETING NOVEMBER 17, 2017

Evolution of OAI Software for Data Center Deployments Communication Systems Department EURECOM

RADIO PROTOCOLS FOR LTE AND LTE-ADVANCED

E. The enodeb performs the compression and encryption of the user data stream.

Design and Implementation of an Open Source NB-IoT enb

Key Performance Aspects of an LTE FDD based Smart Grid Communications Network

Fronthaul scenarios and 1914 transport classes. Vincenzo Sestito, SM Optics June 22 nd, 2017

- Page 1 of 8 -

5G Standards and Outlook for 5G Unlicensed

3GPP TS V ( )

Frequency domain IQ. Richard Maiden - Intel

LTE Training LTE (Long Term Evolution) Training Bootcamp, Crash Course

WCDMA evolution: HSPA and MBMS

Integrating Base Stations with a Software Defined Core Network

INTRODUCTION TO LTE. ECE MOBILE COMMUNICATION Monday, 25 June 2018

NFV and SDN: The enablers for elastic networks

awaves academy EPS/LTE Training Program In cooperation with GreenlightPM and TheSpecTool awaves academy

Softwarized LTE Self-Backhauling Solution and Its Evaluation

Impact of Packetization and Scheduling on C-RAN Fronthaul Performance

X-TCP: a Cross Layer Approach for TCP Uplink Flows in mmwave Networks Laboratorio di Fondamenti di Informatica

An In-depth Study of LTE: Effect of Network Protocol and Application Behavior on Performance

II. RELATED WORK. Backhaul Network 5G-CORE S1AP/X2AP UDP/GTP SDAP. F1 Interface. Fronthaul/Midhaul Network RLC MAC PHY RLC MAC PHY MAC PHY

Evaluation of M2M Data Traffic Aggregation in LTE-A Uplink

Dual Connectivity in LTE 資策會智通所 魏嘉宏

ETSI TS V ( )

Primebit Solution EXPERT DIPLOMA IN PROTOCOL TESTING COURSE CONTENT

Load Tester v4.0 Release Notes - Page 1 of 6 -

5G transport latency requirement analysis. Lujing Cai, Abdellah Tazi AT&T

Exam Questions 4A0-M02

Keywords Quality of Service (QoS), Long Term Evolution (LTE), System Architecture Evolution (SAE), Evolved Packet System (EPS).

Primebit Solution MASTERED DIPLOMA IN PROTOCOL DEVELOPMENT COURSE CONTENT

LTE EPC Emulators v10.0 Release Notes - Page 1 of 15 -

Transport Requirements for a 5G Broadband Use Case. Vishwanath Ramamurthi Thomas Tan Shankar Venkatraman Verizon

Long Term Evolution - LTE L10 Training Programs. Catalog of Course Descriptions

Priority Considerations for Fronthaul Traffic. Raghu M. Rao, Xilinx Inc.

Long Term Evolution - Advanced (LTE-Advanced)

Infrastructure Test System

Virtual Mobile Core Placement for Metro Area BY ABHISHEK GUPTA FRIDAY GROUP MEETING JANUARY 5, 2018

UMTS course. Introduction UMTS principles. UMTS Evolution. UMTS Project

Cloud-RAN in Support of URLLC

Throughput requirements

Converged backhaul and fronthaul considerations. Jouni Korhonen Broadcom Ltd. 10/26-28/2016 IEEE TF

4G LTE MOBILE TOWER TRANSMITTER RECEIVER REAL SYSTEM TRAINER MODEL - 4GLTE100

China Mobile s View on Next Generation Fronthaul Interface

ENG Advanced Mobile Networks: QoS, QoE & Technical Aspects

R-FFT: Function Split at IFFT/FFT in Unified LTE CRAN and Cable Access Network

Transcription:

Requirements for 5G Fronthaul L. Valcarenghi, K. Kondepu, F. Giannone, A. Marotta*, P. Castoldi Scuola Superiore Sant Anna, Pisa, Italy Università degli studi dell Aquila IEEE SA P1914.1 presentation Conference Call 30/11/2016

Outline Objective Proposed functional splits Simulation scenario Overhead computation Results Conclusions 2

Objective Evaluate the communication overhead between UE and BBU for different functional splits 3

Proposed functional splits 3GPP 4

LTE-A Pro Protocol Stack RRC: broadcast of System Information (i.e., System Information Blocks SIB); paging; mobility functions ROHC=robust header compression ARQ=Automated Repreat request HARQ=Hybrid Automated Repeat request 5

Fronthaul capacity requirements: previous work (1) RRC: broadcast of System Information (i.e., System Information Blocks SIB); paging; mobility functions L2 ROHC=robust header compression ARQ=Automated Repreat request HARQ=Hybrid Automated Repeat request 6

Fronthaul capacity requirements: previous work (2) Split A Forwards the time-domain received signals that have been downconverted to the baseband and analogto-digital (AD) converted (indicated by block RF/AD) (CPRI approach) Split B Removes the Cyclic Prefix (CP) and transforms the Rx signal to frequency-domain using fast Fourier transformation (FFT), guard subcarriers can be removed (block CP/FFT). Split C Only the resource elements (REs) remain after RE demapping (block RE Demap) and have to be forwarded to the cloud-platform (If only a part of the RE are actually utilized by the user equipment (UE) in a cell) Split D The receive processing (block Rx Proc) per user consists of equalization in frequency domain, inverse discrete Fourier transformation (IDFT), MIMO receive processing, and demapping Split E During forward error correction (FEC) decoding (block DEC), data bits are recovered from the received symbols and redundant bits are removed, resulting in the pure MAC payload at the decoder output. Source: Dirk Wübben et al., Benefits and Impact of Cloud Computing on 5G Signal Processing, IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING MAGAZINE, Nov. 2014 7

Our study RRC: broadcast of System Information (i.e., System Information Blocks SIB); paging; mobility functions L2 ROHC=robust header compression ARQ=Automated Repreat request HARQ=Hybrid Automated Repeat request 8

Downlink Packet Encapsulation Adaptation from A. Larmo, M. Lindström, M. Meyer, G. Pelletier, J. Torsner and H. Wiemann, "The LTE link-layer design," A. in IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 52-59, April 2009. 9

Utilized tool OAI Software Stack IP packets AT commands MME Application S+P-GW Application Linux IP stack NAS enb Application NAS S11 Abstraction S1-U RRC RRC S1-MME X2AP S1-U S1-MME S6a/Diameter GTP-U SGi PDCP PDCP SCTP UDP SCTP UDP RLC RLC IP IP MAC MAC Ethernet Ethernet PHY PHY UEs enbs MME + S+P-GW Wireshark 3GPP layers Linux stack Control Plane Data Plane, IP packet Implements LTE Rel10 Access Stratum (enb & UE) and EPC (MME, S+P-GW, HSS) All the stack (incl. PHY) runs entirely on a PC in real-time operating system (RTAI, Xenomai, low-latency kernel) Wireshark/tshark

Setup and Performance Evaluation Parameters 100s Inter departure time Small packet CBR C-plane overhead (at each layer) the overall amount of control data and overhead exchanged in bytes including System Information Blocks (SIBs) U-plane overhead (at each layer) number of overhead bytes used to transport the considered application data C-plane functional split overhead (CFSO) the sum of C-plane overhead of each layer residing at the BBU based on the implemented functional split option CFSO percentage the ratio between CFSO and the offered load. Overhead capacity consumption Uplink traffic only the ratio between the overhead and the experiment duration for C-plane overhead, U-plane overhead, and CFSO 11

Results: overhead and overhead capacity RRC contribute more number of bytes to the C-plane overhead (periodic transmission of SIB information) PDCP and RLC have less contribution to C-plane overhead because these layers are involved only in transportation of DCCH for non-access stratum (NAS)-evolved packet core (EPC) access stratum (AS)-evolved packet core (EPC) connection RLC has other additional C-plane overhead to specify signalling radio bearers (SRB) for RRC and NAS signalling messages The C-plane MAC overhead includes MAC PDU header, buffer status report (BSR), and power headroom report (PHR) of MAC control elements Layer contributions are separate 12

Results: C-plane functional split overhead capacity and percentage Bottom layer sums the contribution by upper layers 13

Conclusions Functional split overhead evaluation Functional split requirements PDCP and RLC have a slight impact on the functional split requirements From MAC above Capacity required for transporting both user and control data are limited to slightly less than one Megabit per second. The limiting requirement for the fronthaul is the latency which can vary from units of milliseconds (PHY split) to tens of seconds (RRC split) 14

thank you! email: luca.valcarenghi@sssup.it 15

Fronthaul capacity requirements Source: A. Maeder, M. Lalam, A. De Domenico, E. Pateromichelakis, D. Wubben, J. Bartelt, R. Fritzsche, P. Rost, "Towards a flexible functional split for cloud-ran networks," in Networks and Communications (EuCNC), 2014 European Conference on, vol., no., pp.1-5, 23-26 June 2014 16

Fronthaul latency requirements Source: Common Public Radio Interface (CPRI) Specification V6.1. [Online] Available: http://www.cpri.info/spec.html, Tech. Rep., 2014 17