CDISC Standards and the Semantic Web

Similar documents
CDISC Standards End-to-End: Enabling QbD in Data Management Sam Hume

Helping The Define.xml User

Advantages of a real end-to-end approach with CDISC standards

Standards Driven Innovation

SDTM-ETL 3.2 User Manual and Tutorial

CDASH Standards and EDC CRF Library. Guang-liang Wang September 18, Q3 DCDISC Meeting

Improving Metadata Compliance and Assessing Quality Metrics with a Standards Library

Study Composer: a CRF design tool enabling the re-use of CDISC define.xml metadata

Now let s take a look

A Taste of SDTM in Real Time

Paper DS07 PhUSE 2017 CDISC Transport Standards - A Glance. Giri Balasubramanian, PRA Health Sciences Edwin Ponraj Thangarajan, PRA Health Sciences

Implementing CDISC Using SAS. Full book available for purchase here.

Why organizations need MDR system to manage clinical metadata?

Managing CDISC version changes: how & when to implement? Presented by Lauren Shinaberry, Project Manager Business & Decision Life Sciences

SDTM-ETL 3.1 User Manual and Tutorial. Working with the WhereClause in define.xml 2.0. Author: Jozef Aerts, XML4Pharma. Last update:

Creating Define-XML v2 with the SAS Clinical Standards Toolkit 1.6 Lex Jansen, SAS

Lex Jansen Octagon Research Solutions, Inc.

Taming the SHREW. SDTM Heuristic Research and Evaluation Workshop

Semantic Technologies and CDISC Standards. Frederik Malfait, Information Architect, IMOS Consulting Scott Bahlavooni, Independent

R1 Test Case that tests this Requirement Comments Manage Users User Role Management

CDASH MODEL 1.0 AND CDASHIG 2.0. Kathleen Mellars Special Thanks to the CDASH Model and CDASHIG Teams

Dataset-XML - A New CDISC Standard

CDISC Public Webinar Standards Updates and Additions. 26 Feb 2015

Material covered in the Dec 2014 FDA Binding Guidances

Out-of-the-box %definexml

SDTM-ETL. New features in version 3.2. SDTM-ETLTM: New features in v.3.2

Sandra Minjoe, Accenture Life Sciences John Brega, PharmaStat. PharmaSUG Single Day Event San Francisco Bay Area

Beyond OpenCDISC: Using Define.xml Metadata to Ensure End-to-End Submission Integrity. John Brega Linda Collins PharmaStat LLC

The CDISC Moonshot - Can we do it? Presented by FH-Prof. Dr. Jozef Aerts University of Applied Sciences FH Joanneum Graz, Austria

Define 2.0: What is new? How to switch from 1.0 to 2.0? Presented by FH-Prof.Dr. Jozef Aerts University of Applied Sciences FH Joanneum Graz, Austria

Hanming Tu, Accenture, Berwyn, USA

From ODM to SDTM: An End-to-End Approach Applied to Phase I Clinical Trials

Edwin Ponraj Thangarajan, PRA Health Sciences, Chennai, India Giri Balasubramanian, PRA Health Sciences, Chennai, India

SAS offers technology to facilitate working with CDISC standards : the metadata perspective.

SDTM-ETL TM. New features in version 1.6. Author: Jozef Aerts XML4Pharma July SDTM-ETL TM : New features in v.1.6

How to write ADaM specifications like a ninja.

PharmaSUG 2014 PO16. Category CDASH SDTM ADaM. Submission in standardized tabular form. Structure Flexible Rigid Flexible * No Yes Yes

From Implementing CDISC Using SAS. Full book available for purchase here. About This Book... xi About The Authors... xvii Acknowledgments...

Introduction to ADaM and What s new in ADaM

The Wonderful World of Define.xml.. Practical Uses Today. Mark Wheeldon, CEO, Formedix DC User Group, Washington, 9 th December 2008

Best Practices for E2E DB build process and Efficiency on CDASH to SDTM data Tao Yang, FMD K&L, Nanjing, China

PhUSE Paper SD09. "Overnight" Conversion to SDTM Datasets Ready for SDTM Submission Niels Mathiesen, mathiesen & mathiesen, Basel, Switzerland

edify Requirements for Evidence-based Templates in Electronic Case Report Forms Marco Schweitzer, Stefan Oberbichler

Clinical Metadata Metadata management with a CDISC mindset

Pharmaceuticals, Health Care, and Life Sciences. An Approach to CDISC SDTM Implementation for Clinical Trials Data

Introduction to Define.xml

How to handle different versions of SDTM & DEFINE generation in a Single Study?

Let s Create Standard Value Level Metadata

Standardizing FDA Data to Improve Success in Pediatric Drug Development

An Efficient Solution to Efficacy ADaM Design and Implementation

Standards Implementation: It Should be Simple Right? Thursday January 18, 2018

Optimization of the traceability when applying an ADaM Parallel Conversion Method

CDISC SDTM and ADaM Real World Issues

A Successful Meta- Data Repository (MDR) - It s About Managing Relationships. Phil Giangiulio & Melanie Paules June, 2018

What is high quality study metadata?

Clinical Metadata A complete metadata and project management solu6on. October 2017 Andrew Ndikom and Liang Wang

Standards Metadata Management (System)

ODM The Operational Efficiency Model: Using ODM to Deliver Proven Cost and Time Savings in Study Set-up

Adding, editing and managing links to external documents in define.xml

DIA 11234: CDER Data Standards Common Issues Document webinar questions

Traceability Look for the source of your analysis results

Business & Decision Life Sciences

Less is more - A visionary View on the Future of CDISC Standards

ISO CTS2 and Value Set Binding. Harold Solbrig Mayo Clinic

Submission-Ready Define.xml Files Using SAS Clinical Data Integration Melissa R. Martinez, SAS Institute, Cary, NC USA

PhUSE EU Connect Paper PP15. Stop Copying CDISC Standards. Craig Parry, SyneQuaNon, Diss, England

Updates on CDISC Standards Validation

Lex Jansen Octagon Research Solutions, Inc.

PharmaSUG Paper DS-24. Family of PARAM***: PARAM, PARAMCD, PARAMN, PARCATy(N), PARAMTYP

Aquila's Lunch And Learn CDISC The FDA Data Standard. Disclosure Note 1/17/2014. Host: Josh Boutwell, MBA, RAC CEO Aquila Solutions, LLC

Taming Rave: How to control data collection standards?

An Alternate Way to Create the Standard SDTM Domains

How a Metadata Repository enables dynamism and automation in SDTM-like dataset generation

MY ATTEMPT TO RID THE CLINICAL WORLD OF EXCEL MIKE MOLTER DIRECTOR OF STATISTICAL PROGRAMMING AND TECHNOLOGY WRIGHT AVE OCTOBER 27, 2016

Mapping and Terminology. English Speaking CDISC User Group Meeting on 13-Mar-08

ADaM and traceability: Chiesi experience

Cost-Benefit Analysis of Retrospective vs. Prospective Data Standardization

Reporting & Visualisation : D un Dun standard maison au format CDISC 02/02/2016 CDISC GUF 1

CDISC Variable Mapping and Control Terminology Implementation Made Easy

Creating Define-XML version 2 including Analysis Results Metadata with the SAS Clinical Standards Toolkit

SCDM 2017 ANNUAL CONFERENCE. September I Orlando

Data Science Services Dirk Engfer Page 1 of 5

Customizing SAS Data Integration Studio to Generate CDISC Compliant SDTM 3.1 Domains

Data Standardisation, Clinical Data Warehouse and SAS Standard Programs

How to review a CRF - A statistical programmer perspective

Automated Creation of Submission-Ready Artifacts Silas McKee, Accenture, Pennsylvania, USA Lourdes Devenney, Accenture, Pennsylvania, USA

Planning to Pool SDTM by Creating and Maintaining a Sponsor-Specific Controlled Terminology Database

ADaM Compliance Starts with ADaM Specifications

Study Data Reviewer s Guide Completion Guideline

Study Data Reviewer s Guide. FDA/PhUSE Project Summary

Power Data Explorer (PDE) - Data Exploration in an All-In-One Dynamic Report Using SAS & EXCEL

Generating Define.xml from Pinnacle 21 Community

From SDTM to displays, through ADaM & Analyses Results Metadata, a flight on board METADATA Airlines

Doctor's Prescription to Re-engineer Process of Pinnacle 21 Community Version Friendly ADaM Development

SAS CLINICAL SYLLABUS. DURATION: - 60 Hours

AUTOMATED CREATION OF SUBMISSION-READY ARTIFACTS SILAS MCKEE

SDTM-ETL 3.1 User Manual and Tutorial

New Approach to Graph Databases

Guidance for building Study and CRF in OpenClinica

Study Data Reviewer s Guide

Transcription:

CDISC Standards and the Semantic Web Dave Iberson-Hurst 12 th October 2015 PhUSE Annual Conference, Vienna 1 Abstract With the arrival of the FDA guidance on electronic submissions, CDISC SHARE and the notion of Research Concepts the time is ripe to look at improved implementations of the CDISC standards to assist in producing high-quality clinical research data. The presentation/paper, drawing on experience of production work and the CDISC SHARE project, will examine a prototype implementation that is being used to gain insights into the use of Research Concepts combined with Semantic Web technologies as the foundation for implementing the CDISC standards. In particular: 1. Review why we want Research Concepts and highlight the principles behind them 2. Look at a prototype semantic web MDR implementation based upon the ISO11179 Metadata Standard, the ISO21090 Healthcare Datatypes Standard, the BRIDG model and RCs taken from the CDISC Therapeutic Area development work. 3. Examine prototype tools to see implementation issues and automation opportunities. 4. Detail the benefits Research Concepts bring to the business and support business artifacts such as annotated CRFs and define.xml. 5. List the existing sources of RC metadata. 2 1

3 We Need Better Clarity! Assumptions section with each SDTM domain contains rules and provisos! --CAT and --SCAT use. Some better defined than others! Often see examples quoted as definitive Complete! Terminology not defined in all cases! Variables float, are not related Support Business Need! Data aggregation and re-use of data! Sponsor! Regulators! Data transparency! Traceability! Operational efficiency! CDISC compliant data to regulators,! The end to end clinical trial process Easy to Understand! Should not require 10 years experience before becoming a SDTM guru Ease of Use! Electronic! Indication of changes! Version managed 4 2

Variable-Based World VSTESTCD C66741 VSORRESU C66770 X X 5 Variable-Based World VSTESTCD C66741? VSORRESU C66770? VSLOC VSLAT X X 6 3

Biomedical (Research) Concepts Impact Assessment " Clarity " Structure " Complete " Terminology " Machine readable " Reusable Biomedical Concept Automation End-to-End Traceability Business Outputs Note: Name change from Research Concept to Biomedical Concept took place in August 2015 7 Simple VS Biomedical Concepts Code C25347 HEIGHT Concept Test Result Name C25347 Height Value Date Units C49668 IN Time C48500 cm 8 4

Vital Signs Additional Information CDISC released (2014) additional information for Vital Signs and ECG VS Provides units and additional relationships e.g. HEIGHT & WEIGHT just units 9 Vital Signs Additional Information SYSBP and DIABP, units and position 10 10 5

Vital Signs Additional Information DIABP Code C25299 Concept Test PosiOon Name C25299 Diastolic Blood Pressure C77532 Result Value Units C49670 mmhg 11 Value Level Metadata Contained within the concepts, for example HEIGHT, Integer, ###, in & cm WEIGHT, Float, ###.##, lbs & kg Also POS, --LOC, --METHOD, --CAT, --SCAT will be handled Code C25347 HEIGHT Concept Test Result Name C25347 Height Value Date Units C49668 IN Time C48500 cm 12 6

Define Once, Use Many Protocol CRF Tabulation Measurement of vital signs (heart rate, blood pressure at rest) Position Diastolic Systolic Units mmhg Units mmhg Correct mapping PLUS Traceability V S T E S T C D V S P O S CRF Capturing DIABP Set the correct test code Protocol dictates capture of Blood Pressure (DIABP + SYSBP) ** Protocol IE criteria could also use RCs ** Shared terminology for response: SITTING, STANDING, SUPINE, ** Statistical Analysis Plan ** 13 Silos Design Study Build Study Capture Tabulate Analyse Submit Business Object Protocol CRF Tabula?on Analysis Dataset Content Std Physical Format??? CDASH SDTM ADaM SDTM??? SDM ODM SAS SAS XML Model BRIDG 14 7

Decrease Need for Mapping & Gain Traceability Design Study Build Study Capture Tabulate Analyse Submit Business Object Process & Traceability Protocol CRF Tabula?on Analysis Dataset Content Std Physical Format??? CDASH SDTM ADaM SDTM??? SDM ODM SAS SAS XML Model Research Concepts BRIDG 15 Increasing Rate of Change Taken from presentation by W Kubick, CDISC Intrachange, August 2015 16 8

Increasing Rate of Change From: http://www.cdisc.org/system/files/all/standard/cfast-ta-project-status.pdf 17 So 18 9

Four Steps STEP 1 MODEL STEP 2 SIMPLE STEP 3 SEMANTIC DATABASE STEP 4 IMPROVE Create a semantic model that encompasses all the items needed to meet the business need. Create a simple MDR and Study Build tool to show the ideas working. The tool will use a simple filebased database to speed progress. Take the model from step 1 and build a user interface (UI) on top learning the lessons from step 2. Improve the initial implementation from step 3. 19 Step 1: Model 20 10

Step 1: Compare Terminology SPARQL Query XML XSLT XML DB XSLT XML SPARQL Query XML XSLT XML 21 Step 1: Compare Terminology 22 11

Step 1: Annotated CRF DB SPARQL Query XML XSLT ODM XSLT HTML 23 Step 1: Notes Used the Topbraid Composer tool to Build the model Be the database Lessons BC approach brings benefits Combined SPARQL query & XSLT approach works well 24 12

Step 2: Simple Tools Desire to see it and focus on user interaction Keep it simple for the user 25 Step 2: Skill Set CDISC Sponsor Domains Forms Domains Ability to create Forms based on BCs & custom Domains based on SDTM Models & BCs. BCs BCs Ability to create BCs (content) using BC Templates. Hide BRIDG from user. BC Templates Ability to create BC Templates. Requires BRIDG knowledge. Hopefully CDISC provide these. Terminology Terminology Ability to manage Sponsor, CDISC and other terminologies. BRIDG BRIDG provides the framework for BCs. 26 13

Step 2: BC Editing 27 Step 2: BC Editing BC structure flattened using alias to make it understandable to those working in the business today Menu Structured to reflect the Skill Set Terminology BC Templates & BCs Form & Domains Study Concept Test Result Date Code Name Value Units C25347 C25347 C49668 HEIGHT Height IN Time C48500 cm 28 14

Step 2: acrf Automated acrf generation to show potential of using BCs and investigate issues 29 Step 2: Notes Built using PHP & Javascript Database a combination of files ODM for Forms and Studies Define for domains Some bespoke XML for other pieces Terminology XML files from Step 1 exports Lessons Can hide the complexity Confirmed the benefits of BCs Can make it easy for the users 30 15

Step 3: Semantic Database User Interface implemented by Web Site Database accessed by SPARQL over HTTP Ontotext S4 Cloud Service Fuseki Apache open source server Implements the model developed during stage 1 31 Step 3 : Terminology Imports owl files issued by CDISC from Dec 2013 onwards Use the power of the query to meet key business needs. Changes and impact of changes 32 16

Step 3: Terminology Changes such as submission value changes and when did it change 33 Step 3: Biomedical Concept Based on ISO1179 BRIDG Classes & Attributes ISO21090 Data Types 34 17

Step 3: Tools SPARQL Query to extract a specified BC 35 Step 3: Biomedical Concept Equivalent BC to that shown for stage 2 36 18

Step 3: Notes Version management and namespaces been a tricky area Power of SPARQL Issues with tools and debugging Benefits of BCs and power for impact analysis, great potential Forms, Domains and Study Build to be done by end of year Blogs will be written! 37 Summary Semantic Technology Impact Assessment " Clarity " Structure " Complete " Terminology " Machine readable " Reusable Biomedical Concept Automation End-to-End Traceability Business Outputs Exports to Support Today s Process 38 19

Useful Links Topic More on Biomedical Concepts Link h]p://www.assero.co.uk/2015/research- concepts- a- what- why- and- how/ ISO25964 h]p://www.assero.co.uk/2015/terminology- and- iso- 25964/ ISO11179 h]p://www.assero.co.uk/2015/all- things- to- all- men- iso- 11179/ Step 2 h]p://www.assero.co.uk/2015/a- bit- of- a- tangent/ GitHub Paper from PresentaOon h]ps://github.com/daveih/alba PhUSE website 39 Contact And More Information Email dave.iberson-hurst@assero.co.uk Blogs Available At www.assero.co.uk 40 20