Survey of European Broadcasters on MPEG-DASH DASH Industry Forum- May 2013

Similar documents
DASH trial Olympic Games. First live MPEG-DASH large scale demonstration.

Video Developer Report 2017

DASH IN ATSC 3.0: BRIDGING THE GAP BETWEEN OTT AND BROADCAST

Interoperability Quest: OTT Video, WebApps and CE

MPEG's Dynamic Adaptive Streaming over HTTP - An Enabling Standard for Internet TV. Thomas Stockhammer Qualcomm Incorporated

LINEAR VIDEO DELIVERY FROM THE CLOUD. A New Paradigm for 24/7 Broadcasting WHITE PAPER

HbbTV Explained

ISO/IEC TR TECHNICAL REPORT. Information technology Dynamic adaptive streaming over HTTP (DASH) Part 3: Implementation Guidelines

Freeview Play Technical Specification Profile. Version: 3.0.9

Video Technology Crossroads What s next?

1.1 SD Commercial File Delivery standard (FAST)

Powering the Next-Generation Video Experience

NEULION DIGITAL PLATFORM POWERING THE NEXT-GENERATION VIDEO EXPERIENCE

TRANSCODER SDK CERTIFICATION PROCESS VENDORS. Instructions to Validate the Correct Implementation of the Nielsen ID3 Software Development Kit

Improving Interoperability Task Force: Update

APPEAR SOFTWARE PORTFOLIO LIVE OTT TRANSCODING

A Converged Content Delivery Platform for IP and QAM Video

Streaming Technologies Delivering Multimedia into the Future. May 2014

Wowza Streaming Engine

Internet Streaming Media Alliance Ultravox Provisional Specification Version 1.0 November 2007

Interoperability and the Large-scale Growth of Broadband Video W3C Web and TV Workshop, 8-9 February 2011

3 September, 2015 Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation NTT Advanced Technology Corporation

Audio issues in MIR evaluation

The Dash for HEVC Nov 2012 Ittiam Systems Pvt Ltd Contact us at

Live Digital Video Advertising Live Digital Video Advertising

EN-100. New Products. Multi-Stream Multi-CODEC Encoder

Anytime, Anywhere, Best Quality: Multiscreen Streaming Workflows for Broadcasters

NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION OR REPRODUCTION

Adaptive Bitrate Streaming

Status of the "H.325 Project"

The Guide to Best Practices in PREMIUM ONLINE VIDEO STREAMING

AWS Elemental MediaPackage. User Guide

3GPP BASED TV SERVICE LAYER

AES67 AND RAVENNA IN A NUTSHELL

Transitioning Video to All-IP IP Video Better Than Broadcast. Fabio Souza Cisco Video Group May/2017

These Are the Top Languages for Enterprise Application Development

Technology Overview. Gallery SIENNA London, England T

MULTISCREEN DELIVERY SOLUTION

Additionally, we present a case study of the National High School Baseball Championship at Koshien Stadium.

MULTISCREEN DELIVERY SOLUTION

Mark Kogan CTO Video Delivery Technologies Bluebird TV

HYBRID BROADCAST AND OTT DELIVERY FOR TERRESTRIAL AND MOBILE TV SERVICES

SOLUTION GUIDE FOR BROADCASTERS

TotalCode Enterprise is an ideal solution for video-on-demand content preparation for any screen anywhere.

HbbTV Companion Screen Sync

This is a preview - click here to buy the full publication

IP-Delivered Broadcast Channels and Related Signalling of HbbTV Applications

INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATION FOR STANDARDISATION ORGANISATION INTERNATIONALE DE NORMALISATION ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11 CODING OF MOVING PICTURES AND AUDIO

Cisco Media Origination System

TotalCode Studio. Professional desktop encoding for digital distribution and over the top services NEW FEATURES

Part III: Survey of Internet technologies

Цепочка доставки UHD. Boris Yurin Account manager TV and Media

IPv6 Migration Framework Case of Institutions in Ethiopia

HSTP-IPTV-GUIDE.1 IPTV

ZEN / ZEN Vision Series Video Encoding Guidelines

Watching the Olympics live over the Internet?

ACCELERATING HEVC ADOPTION

Lecture 27 DASH (Dynamic Adaptive Streaming over HTTP)

White Paper: HTML5 Streaming (Plug-in Free Web Viewer) hanwhasecurity.com

White Paper Scalable Infrastructures supporting OTT and IPTV in Hospitality, Health Care, and Corporate Networks

Comparison of Electronic Signature between Europe and Japan: Possibiltiy of Mutual Recognition

End-to-end IPTV / OTT Solution

Figure 1. The IP network

Adaptive Video Acceleration. White Paper. 1 P a g e

LIN MEDIA Northeast Broadcast Center Launches New Spot Upload Server. January 2011

SamKnows test methodology

Connected. DLNA: Connecting The FUTURE of COMMERCIAL Content

HLS Authoring Update. Media #WWDC17. Eryk Vershen, AVFoundation Engineer

The Frozen Mountain irtc White Paper Series

2017 Windows 10 Enterprise Impact Survey Windows 10 Enterprise Impact Survey

THE STATE OF MEDIA SECURITY HOW MEDIA COMPANIES ARE SECURING THEIR ONLINE PROPERTIES

802.11ac! Breaking the Gigabit Barrier

SubTech 1. Short intro on different subtitle standards ISOBMFF, MPEG-DASH, DVB-DASH, DASH-IF, CMAF, HLS

Choosing a CDN by Kirk Harnack, The Telos Alliance

COMPUTING. SharpStreamer Platform. 2U Video Transcode Acceleration Appliance

Experience. A New Modular E-Learning Platform Integrating an Enhanced Multimedia. Doctoral Program in Computer and Control Engineering (XXX Cycle)

Course Overview and Agenda

Emerging Internet Television Standards

October 26, 2016 Streaming Media West Booth 101

A Pain-Free Way to Build Live, Multi-Screen Video Delivery Networks

The Nielsen Comparable Q2 2016

A Case Study on Cloud Based Hybrid Adaptive Mobile Streaming: Performance Evaluation

Extraordinary TV for Everyone

Modular End-to-End IPTV Solution

COMPANY OVERVIEW. ANEVIA 79 rue Benoît Malon Gentilly, France

Fraunhofer FOKUS. Fraunhofer Institute for Open Communication Systems Kaiserin-Augusta-Allee Berlin, Germany.

ANSI/SCTE

Shifting value with Operators Profile

Networking Applications

MPEG-4 aacplus - Audio coding for today s digital media world

Audio Visual: Introduction to Audio Visual Technology

The OTT Challenge. Daryl Collins Senior Network Architect Akamai Technologies 2017 AKAMAI FASTER FORWARD TM

What s the magic of real-time video streaming with hyper-low latency?

BECOMING A DATA-DRIVEN BROADCASTER AND DELIVERING A UNIFIED AND PERSONALISED BROADCAST USER EXPERIENCE

A TV platform jelen kihívásai és a fejlődés iránya. Horváth Ede 2017 October 05.

Solid State Storage: Trends, Pricing Concerns, and Predictions for the Future

MULTI SCREEN ENCODER/TRANSCODER AND

ADAPTIVE STREAMING AND CONVERGED MANAGEMENT STRATEGY IN MULTISCREEN VIDEO SERVICE IMPLEMENTATION Duncan Potter, Goran Appelquist Edgeware AB

HTTP Adaptive Streaming

Polycom RealPresence Access Director System

Transcription:

Survey of European Broadcasters on MPEG-DASH DASH Industry Forum- May 2013 Introduction At the EBU s BroadThinking 2013 event (http://tech.ebu.ch/broadthinking2013) in March 2013, the DASH Industry Forum (DASH-IF) conducted a survey of European broadcasters on MPEG-DASH (DASH). Thirteen major broadcasters responded to the survey. This report summarizes the results and examines if the DASH IF s activities and focus is aligned with the needs expressed in the survey. Survey Results Figure 1 demonstrates the DASH deployment plans by the broadcasters. These results show that DASH will be adopted by nearly all European broadcasters taking the survey. Much of this adoption is expected to take place under the HbbTV 1.5 standard. It is worth noticing that over 75% of the deployments are projected to occur between the second half of 2013 and the first half of 2014. Figure 1 DASH Deployment Plans According to Figure 2, European broadcasters believe that client availability is the biggest concern by far for deployment of DASH. Figure 3 shows that the availability of DASH clients for all major platforms (including support in browsers) is desired by the broadcasters. Availability of content packaging tools is the second biggest concern. Since several DASH-IF members are currently developing DASH-IF clients for various platforms, we believe that the first concern will be addressed in a timely manner. DASH-IF is also Survey of European Broadcasters on MPEG-DASH 1 DASH-IF May 2013

implementing a DASH open source reference client in JavaScript to be used out-of-the box with browsers and/or to assist the DASH client implementers to implement clients for other platforms. DASH- IF encoder members are also offering DASH encoding and packaging tools that address the European broadcasters second concern. Figure 2 DASH deployment hurdles Figure 3 Desired platform support Survey of European Broadcasters on MPEG-DASH 2 DASH-IF May 2013

Figure 4 shows that both live and on-demand services will be offered by almost all European broadcasters, while time-shifted content delivery will be deployed by half of them. The DASH-AVC/264 Implementation Guidelines (DASH-AVC/264) support the combination of DASH profiles that are most suitable for deploying live, on-demand and time-shifted services and therefore seem well matched to the broadcaster s requirements. Figure 5 shows the broadcasters desired end-to-end delay for the live services. Note that a significant majority of the broadcasters desire an end-to-end delay of 10 seconds or less. DASH and more specifically DASH-AVC/264 are designed to be able to achieve these end-to-end delay goals. Figure 4 Target services Figure 5 Desired live services latency Survey of European Broadcasters on MPEG-DASH 3 DASH-IF May 2013

Figure 6 demonstrates the popularity of content protection schemes among various broadcasters. Note that while some content will be delivered without content protection, a variety of different DRM schemes are desired by the broadcasters. DASH-AVC/264, which recommends the use of DASH and Common Encryption together, allows delivery of both non-protected content and common encrypted content that can be used with multiple concurrent DRM schemes. Also note that according to Figure 7, both entire segment encryption as well as the HTTPS protocol will be used for service level protection. Delivery of content without any service level protection will be used in 60% of the deployments. Figure 6 Content protection needs Figure 7 Content service protection Survey of European Broadcasters on MPEG-DASH 4 DASH-IF May 2013

Figure 8 shows that broadcasters intend to deploy services that use both single and multiple audio and video tracks. As anticipated, single track video with single/multi-track audio will be the most popular service in Europe. Figure 9 indicates that stereo and 5.1 multichannel audio are projected to be the dominant audio channel configurations in the services offered by these broadcasters. Figure 8 Single or multiple track media Figure 9 Multi-Channel Audio According to Figure 10, various models of advertising are of interest to the broadcasters. They plan to deploy services with no advertisements, with server side linear non-targeted advertisements, with server side targeted advertisements and with client-side targeted advertisements. Note that DASH enables the above use cases both for live and on-demand applications. Survey of European Broadcasters on MPEG-DASH 5 DASH-IF May 2013

Figure 10 Desired ad-insertion scenarios Internet streaming quality aspects of delivery are important to the broadcasters for over the top services as indicated in Figure 11. The most important factor is the content visual quality and the user s quality of experience. Other important factors include the overall performance and consistency of clients, support for content protection and ad-insertion. DASH is designed to support all of these aspects, which the survey shows is important for a successful OTT service. Figure 11 Relevant business aspects of DASH Figure 12 indicates the intentions of broadcasters to augment and replace their existing services with DASH. The survey does not indicate whether the augmentation is to provide a smooth transition to DASH or whether the existing proprietary formats will also be offered in the long-term. Survey of European Broadcasters on MPEG-DASH 6 DASH-IF May 2013

Figure 12 DASH as the replacement of existing solution? Figure 13 shows that, in terms of new video formats and services, broadcasters are mainly interested in deploying the HEVC video codec and in delivering content to companion screens with their OTT services. DASH-IF is currently working on interoperability points, test cases and test vectors for combining HEVC with DASH, and based on this will develop DASH-HEVC similar in spirit to the already published DASH- AVC/264. Figure 13 New formats and services Survey of European Broadcasters on MPEG-DASH 7 DASH-IF May 2013

Figure 14 indicates that functional verification of the clients is the most important certification aspect to the broadcasters, i.e., over 60% of broadcasters would expect functional certification. Figure 14 also shows that although some broadcasters would accept uncertified clients, others would expect at least minimum performance certification from clients. Figure 14 Client certification Figure 15 evaluates the benefits of DASH to broadcasters. Stability and openness of the DASH international standard, anticipated broad client support, broad availability of encoding tools and reduced content publishing costs are the most important benefits to the broadcasters. Ability of supporting different ad-insertion paradigms as was multiple-drm support are other benefits. This survey shows that broadcasters would benefit from all the main features of DASH compared to proprietary solutions. Figure 15 Benefits of DASH to broadcasters Survey of European Broadcasters on MPEG-DASH 8 DASH-IF May 2013

Finally, Figure 16 shows that the broadcasters need white papers, specifications, test vectors, conformance and reference software as well as licensing information to design and deploy DASH services. DASH-IF is focusing on these issues. For example, DASH-AVC/264 provides a first basic set of detailed implementation guidelines. DASH-IF is also providing the test cases, test procedures and test vectors upon which DASH-AVC/264 is based. Additional white papers on application scenarios such as ad-insertion will be provided by DASH-IF in the future. DASH-IF is also in the process of developing additional implementation guidelines, for example for support of enhanced audio and for support of HEVC. Figure 16 Needed support for DASH deployment Conclusion In summary, the survey indicates that most European broadcasters who answered the survey plan to deploy DASH between the second half of 2013 and the first half of 2014. Their biggest challenge is the availability of DASH clients, expected to be largely available in the second half of 2013. The survey indicates that live, on-demand and time-shifted services will be widely supported. Furthermore, the efforts of the DASH-IF to provide DASH-AVC/264, as well as the associated test cases, test vectors, conformance software and reference client software will assist the European Broadcasters in deploying such services. Survey of European Broadcasters on MPEG-DASH 9 DASH-IF May 2013