Semantic Query: Solving the Needs of a Net-Centric Data Sharing Environment

Similar documents
Automapper: Relational Database Semantic Translation using OWL and SWRL

Limitations of the WWW

Semantic Queries and Mediation in a RESTful Architecture

MDA & Semantic Web Services Integrating SWSF & OWL with ODM

Implementing the Army Net Centric Data Strategy in a Service Oriented Environment

Semantic Web Programming

Semantic Web Systems Web Services Part 2 Jacques Fleuriot School of Informatics

Army Data Services Layer (ADSL) Data Mediation Providing Data Interoperability and Understanding in a

WHY WE NEED AN XML STANDARD FOR REPRESENTING BUSINESS RULES. Introduction. Production rules. Christian de Sainte Marie ILOG

Grounding OWL-S in SAWSDL

Extracting Ontologies from Standards: Experiences and Issues

Semantic Web. Semantic Web Services. Morteza Amini. Sharif University of Technology Spring 90-91

Semantic Web. Semantic Web Services. Morteza Amini. Sharif University of Technology Fall 94-95

Structure of This Presentation

Semantic Web. Lecture XIII Tools Dieter Fensel and Katharina Siorpaes. Copyright 2008 STI INNSBRUCK

MDA & Semantic Web Services Extending ODM with Service Semantics

Reasoning with the Web Ontology Language (OWL)

Toward a Standard Rule Language for Semantic Integration of the DoD Enterprise

DAML Integration and Transition BBN Technologies

Efficient Querying of Web Services Using Ontologies

1 Copyright 2011, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.

Realizing the Army Net-Centric Data Strategy (ANCDS) in a Service Oriented Architecture (SOA)

Easing the Definition of N Ary Relations for Supporting Spatio Temporal Models in OWL

SADI Semantic Web Services

The Model-Driven Semantic Web Emerging Standards & Technologies

Advanced Topics in the Semantic Web: Semantic Services for Business Process Management

WSDL versioning. Facts Basic scenario. WSDL -Web Services Description Language SAWSDL -Semantic Annotations for WSDL and XML Schema

1. Introduction to SWRL

Integration of the Semantic Web with Meta Object Facilities

Rule System Interoperability on the Semantic Web with SWRL

RuleML and SWRL, Proof and Trust

Deep integration of Python with Semantic Web technologies

Semantic Technologies and CDISC Standards. Frederik Malfait, Information Architect, IMOS Consulting Scott Bahlavooni, Independent

Semantic Web Rules. - Tools and Languages - Holger Knublauch. Tutorial at Rule ML 2006, Athens, GA

Semantic Web. Ontology and OWL. Morteza Amini. Sharif University of Technology Fall 95-96

A Tool for Storing OWL Using Database Technology

The Web Mashup Scripting Language Profile

A Review and Comparison of Rule Languages and Rule-based Inference Engines for the Semantic Web

Table of Contents. iii

An overview of RDB2RDF techniques and tools

Ontologies and OWL. Riccardo Rosati. Knowledge Representation and Semantic Technologies

The OWL API: An Introduction

Genea: Schema-Aware Mapping of Ontologies into Relational Databases

Extracting knowledge from Ontology using Jena for Semantic Web

CHAPTER 7. Observations, Conclusions and Future Directions Observations 7.2. Limitations of the Model 7.3. Conclusions 7.4.

Web Ontology Language for Service (OWL-S) The idea of Integration of web services and semantic web

Services Breakout: Expressiveness Challenges & Industry Trends. Co-Chairs: David Martin & Sheila McIlraith with Benjamin Grosof October 17, 2002

Contents. G52IWS: The Semantic Web. The Semantic Web. Semantic web elements. Semantic Web technologies. Semantic Web Services

Usability, Databases and Ontologies

Ontological Modeling: Part 15

logic importance logic importance (2) logic importance (3) specializations of logic Horn logic specializations of logic RDF and OWL

Rules in the Semantic Web Services Language (SWSL): An Overview for Standardization Directions

CSc 8711 Report: OWL API

Deriving OWL Ontologies from UML Models: an Enterprise Modelling Approach.

The RuleML Family of Web Rule Languages

Automatic Transformation of Relational Database Schema into OWL Ontologies

Semantic Technologies

The Semantic Web. INF5100 Autumn 2007 Norun C. Sanderson

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

Main topics: Presenter: Introduction to OWL Protégé, an ontology editor OWL 2 Semantic reasoner Summary TDT OWL

Readme file for Oracle Spatial and Graph and OBIEE Sample Application (V305) VirtualBox

<Insert Picture Here> Click to edit Master title style

OWL a glimpse. OWL a glimpse (2) requirements for ontology languages. requirements for ontology languages

DAML Tools for Rules Next-Phase Plan

DEVELOPING AN OWL ONTOLOGY FOR E- TOURISM

Ontological Modeling: Part 14

Publishing OWL ontologies with Presto

Rei and Rules. Tim Finin, UMBC Lalana Kagal, MIT

The ISO D approach

An Introduction to the Semantic Web. Jeff Heflin Lehigh University

Expressive Querying of Semantic Databases with Incremental Query Rewriting

Presented By Aditya R Joshi Neha Purohit

Standardization of Ontologies

Chapter 3 Research Method

SHARE Repository Framework: Component Specification and Ontology. Jean Johnson and Curtis Blais Naval Postgraduate School

Rules, RIF and RuleML

Page 1. Oracle9i OLAP. Agenda. Mary Rehus Sales Consultant Patrick Larkin Vice President, Oracle Consulting. Oracle Corporation. Business Intelligence

OWL and tractability. Based on slides from Ian Horrocks and Franz Baader. Combining the strengths of UMIST and The Victoria University of Manchester

ONTOLOGY LIBRARIES: A STUDY FROM ONTOFIER AND ONTOLOGIST PERSPECTIVES

DIONE. (DAML Integrated Ontology Evolution Tools) Ontology Versioning in Semantic Web Applications. ISX Corporation Lehigh University

Enterprise Information Integration using Semantic Web Technologies:

Web Ontology Language: OWL

MetaMatrix Enterprise Data Services Platform

Data Governance for the Connected Enterprise

Scaling the Semantic Wall with AllegroGraph and TopBraid Composer. A Joint Webinar by TopQuadrant and Franz

Web Ontology Language (OWL)

FHIR RDF Sample side by side comparisons

SEMANTIC SOLUTIONS FOR OIL & GAS: ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

Flexible Tools for the Semantic Web

JENA: A Java API for Ontology Management

BaseVISor: A Triples-Based Inference Engine Outfitted to Process RuleML and R-Entailment Rules

The Web Mashup Scripting Language Profile Marwan Sabbouh, Jeff Higginson, Caleb Wan, Salim Semy, Danny Gagne

MASON: A Proposal For An Ontology Of Manufacturing Domain

SEMANTIC WEB AND COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF INFERENCE ENGINES

Demystifying the Semantic Web

The ICENI Semantic Service Adaptation Framework

H1 Spring B. Programmers need to learn the SOAP schema so as to offer and use Web services.

12th ICCRTS. On the Automated Generation of an OWL Ontology based on the Joint C3 Information Exchange Data Model (JC3IEDM)

IEEE P1900.B: Representation of Contextual/Policy Information & Information Recovery Date:

Teiid Designer User Guide 7.5.0

Transcription:

Semantic Query: Solving the Needs of a Net-Centric Data Sharing Environment Slides available at www.asio.bbn.com/2007/05/stc/stc2007.ppt www.asio.bbn.com/2007/05/stc/stc2007.pdf Matthew Fisher mfisher@bbn.com Mike Dean mdean@bbn.com 23 May 2007

Agenda Problem Federated Semantic Queries Background Semantic Query Architecture Components Process Flow DoD 8320.02-G Directive Demonstration 2

Advanced technology research and development firm, principal offices in Cambridge, MA and Washington, DC area ~670 employees Who is BBN Technologies? Known for taking risks and challenging conventions in pursuit of new and fundamentally better solutions Problems on the edge of doable Integrator for DARPA Agent Markup Language (DAML) program Developer of various Semantic Web tools/apps Involvement in W3C Semantic Web Activity RDF Core WG OWL SWRL RIF WG

The Need! Deliver information: as a single response that is trustworthy and up-to-date from all necessary data sources in a timely fashion with minimal or no human assistance without having intimate knowledge of data sources 4

The Problem Data is inaccessible Not a data federation issue Data is spread over more than a single repository Data is available but in varying, sometimes proprietary, formats requires special access, APIs, systems, etc RDBMS XML CSV OODBMS 5

The Problem Data and its semantics are known to a subset of key personnel Widespread organizational threat Data is currently aggregated but requires manual intervention Resource intensive Error prone Depends on experienced personnel 6

Traditional Solutions Data Warehousing Data Mining Business Intelligence (BI) artifacts On Line Analytical Processing (OLAP) Enterprise Application Integration (EAI) Multi-dimensional Databases Very Large Databases (VLDB) 7

A Federated Semantic Solution Asio Semantic Distributed Query Developed in Java Incorporates standards-based languages OWL, SWRL, SPARQL Integration of three Asio tools Semantic Query Decomposition (SQD) Semantic Bridge for Relational Databases (SBRD) Semantic Bridge for Web Services (SBWS) 8

SDQ Architecture 1 Query: SPARQL Query Result Set 6 SWRL Rules Asio Cartographer Backwards Rule Chaining 5 Semantic Query Decomposition (SQD) 2 3 Query Decomposition Generation of Sub Queries Automapper Mapping Ontology Data Source Ontology OWL Semantic Bridge Database OWL Semantic Bridge Web Service Semantic Bridge Database 4 Data Access RDBMS SOAP WS RDBMS 9

Asio Tools Semantic Query Decomposition (SQD) Responsible for query division, bridge invocation, aggregating bridge result sets, returning domain-based response Semantic Bridge Responsible for taking SPARQL query, translating it to native language, executing query and returning query results (data source ontology) 10

OWL DL Semantic Languages Reasoning, computational tractability SWRL Semantic Web Rule Language Horn-like rules Use of antecedents and consequents Combination OWL DL/Lite, Unary/Binary Datalog RuleML languages Allows new statements to be added based on the assertion of other statements 11

SWRL Semantic Languages (con t) W3C Member Submission May 2004 SWRL/RDF Allows storage with ontology, data Sample tool support: Pellet: UMD DL-safe rules Jena: HP via SweetRules translation Protégé: rule engine agnostic, editor & execution RacerPro: Germany, based on Racer Bossam: South Korea 12

Semantic Languages (con t) SPARQL SPARQL Protocol and RDF Query Language Query RDF graphs via pattern matching Reasonably familiar to SQL users Query forms: SELECT CONSTRUCT Support for DESCRIBE ASK Blank nodes (non-distinguishing vars) RDF Collections FILTERs OPTIONALs UNIONs 13

Name SBRD Example Staffing Table Project Department ID Hours Role MattF Alpha 1 100.5 Developer MikeD Alpha 2 50.2 Tech Lead MattG Beta 1 92.0 Architect DaveK Beta 1 120.0 Developer MikeD Beta 2 30.8 Consultant DaveK Alpha 1 87.8 Indagator Departments Table ID Name 1 System Solutions 2 Research and Development 3 Management Primary Key 14

Automapper (1/2) Uses JDBC to retrieve schema of database Creates the data source ontology Tables owl:class Columns owl:datatypeproperty, owl:objectproperty Restrictions: owl:maxcardinality owl:functionalproperty owl:allvaluesfrom Inverse Functionality (via SWRL) Based on primary key(s) Class-specific owl:cardinality 15

Automapper (1/2) Data Source Ontology dsont:owled.departments a owl:class; rdfs:subclassof [ a owl:restriction ; owl:onproperty dsont:owled.departments.id ; owl:allvaluesfrom xsd:decimal ], [ a owl:restriction ; owl:onproperty dsont:owled.departments.id ; owl:maxcardinality "1"^^xsd:nonNegativeInteger ]. dsont:owled.staffing a owl:class; rdfs:subclassof [ a owl:restriction ; owl:onproperty dsont:owled.staffing.name ; owl:maxcardinality "1"^^xsd:nonNegativeInteger ], [ a owl:restriction ; owl:onproperty dsont:owled.staffing.name ; owl:allvaluesfrom xsd:string ], [ a owl:restriction ; owl:onproperty dsont:owled.staffing.deptid.object ; owl:maxcardinality "1"^^xsd:nonNegativeInteger ]. dsont:owled.departmentssameindividual a ruleml:imp ; ruleml:body ( [ a swrl:classatom ; swrl:argument1 :A ; swrl:classpredicate dsont:owled.departments ] [ a swrl:classatom ; swrl:argument1 :B ; swrl:classpredicate dsont:owled.departments ] [ a swrl:datavaluedpropertyatom ; swrl:argument1 :A ; swrl:argument2 :Var0 ; swrl:propertypredicate dsont:owled.departments.id ] [ a swrl:datavaluedpropertyatom ; swrl:argument1 :B ; swrl:argument2 :Var0 ; swrl:propertypredicate dsont:owled.departments.id ] ) ; ruleml:head ( [ a swrl:sameindividualatom ; swrl:argument1 :A ; swrl:argument2 :B ] ). 16

Automapper (2/2) Generates mapping data Transform data from database to data source ontology Based on D2RQ mapping ontology Removed :AdditionalProperty :join Added :constraint :KeyConstraint (Foreign Key equality) 17

Automapper (2/2) Mapping Data :OWLED.STAFFING.DEPTID.OBJ a map:objectpropertybridge; map:constraint [ a map:keyconstraint; map:objectcolumnoperand "ID"; map:operator map:equalsoperator; map:subjectcolumnoperand "DEPTID" ]; map:objectclassmap dsont:owled.departments; map:property dsont:owled.staffing.deptid.object. :OWLED.DEPARTMENTS.ID a map:datatypepropertybridge; map:column "ID"; map:datatype xsd:decimal; map:language "en"; map:property dsont:owled.departments.id. :Owled.Departments a map:classmap; map:datatypepropertybridge :OWLED.DEPARTMENTS.ID, :OWLED.DEPARTMENTS.NAME; map:table "DEPARTMENTS"; map:type dsont:owled.departments; map:uripattern "http://asio.bbn.com/2007/05/stc/ds-ont#owled.departments@@id@@". 18

Putting it all together SWRL rules allow data source statements to be translated into domain ontology statements Data integration without modifying ontologies Customized Domain User Defined Operational Picture Example?s dsont:department.id 1 =>?s dom:hasdepartment :SystemSolutions 19

Correlation Configuration Registry Personalized workspace that determines the ontologies, rules used by SDQ architecture Loaded once at initialization Workspace is based on a configuration ontology 20

SBWS Conceptual Example Similar to SBRD WSDL is foundational artifact for data source ontology Data accessibility remains in the control of owner/maintainer Use of OWL-S Interfacing via SOAP to web service Transform results to RDF 21

OWL-S Semantic Web Service Enables automated discovery, invocation, composition, monitoring W3C Member Submission November 2004 Potential Alternatives: SAWSDL, WSMO, SWSF Simple description of a web service Presents Service Profile Supports Service Grounding DescribedBy Service Model 22

DoD 8320.02-G Directive Released April 2006 Assisting DoD IT departments with supporting the net-centric vision Defines COIs: roles and responsibilities COI formation, evolution, execution Identify information key to mission success and ensure information is visible, accessible, understandable and promotes trust 23

8320 Information Directives Visible Identify Policy Guidelines Metadata Discovery services Accessible Using network-based methods Humans and Machines Pull on Demand Standards vs. proprietary APIs Promoting Trust Pedigree/Provenance Embedded in Metadata Security Labels Understandable Informational Context DoD Metadata Registry Semantics! Taxonomies, Ontologies 8320 Standard aligns very well with the Semantic Web 24

Current Availability Part of BBN s Asio Suite www.asio.bbn.com Reusable Semantic Web Tools Developed with a focus as standalone component Successful fusion of tools 25

Demonstration 26

Q & A Slides available at www.asio.bbn.com/2007/05/stc/stc2007.ppt www.asio.bbn.com/2007/05/stc/stc2007.pdf Contact Information Matthew Fisher mfisher@bbn.com Mike Dean mdean@bbn.com 27