Cardinality Lectures

Similar documents
Cardinality of Sets MAT231. Fall Transition to Higher Mathematics. MAT231 (Transition to Higher Math) Cardinality of Sets Fall / 15

9.5 Equivalence Relations

Cardinality of Sets. Washington University Math Circle 10/30/2016

THREE LECTURES ON BASIC TOPOLOGY. 1. Basic notions.

MATH 271 Summer 2016 Assignment 4 solutions

Lecture 17: Continuous Functions

Solutions to Some Examination Problems MATH 300 Monday 25 April 2016

Functions. How is this definition written in symbolic logic notation?

MATHEMATICS 191, FALL 2004 MATHEMATICAL PROBABILITY Outline #1 (Countability and Uncountability)

EDAA40 At home exercises 1

TOPOLOGY, DR. BLOCK, FALL 2015, NOTES, PART 3.

Functions. Def. Let A and B be sets. A function f from A to B is an assignment of exactly one element of B to each element of A.

2. Functions, sets, countability and uncountability. Let A, B be sets (often, in this module, subsets of R).

CONNECTED SPACES AND HOW TO USE THEM

MATH 22 MORE ABOUT FUNCTIONS. Lecture M: 10/14/2003. Form follows function. Louis Henri Sullivan

Cantor-Schröder-Bernstein Theorem, Part 1

Functions 2/1/2017. Exercises. Exercises. Exercises. and the following mathematical appetizer is about. Functions. Functions

Comparing sizes of sets

Generell Topologi. Richard Williamson. May 6, 2013

MA651 Topology. Lecture 4. Topological spaces 2

1KOd17RMoURxjn2 CSE 20 DISCRETE MATH Fall

Material from Recitation 1

Functions. Jason Filippou UMCP. Jason Filippou UMCP) Functions / 19

Section 1.7 Sequences, Summations Cardinality of Infinite Sets

Section 2.4 Sequences and Summations

Infinity and Uncountability. Countable Countably infinite. Enumeration

CSE 20 DISCRETE MATH. Fall

CSE 20 DISCRETE MATH. Winter

Lecture 0: Reivew of some basic material

Cantor s Diagonal Argument for Different Levels of Infinity

Lecture 15: The subspace topology, Closed sets

A B. bijection. injection. Section 2.4: Countability. a b c d e g

13 th Annual Johns Hopkins Math Tournament Saturday, February 19, 2011 Automata Theory EUR solutions

CS3102 Theory of Computation Solutions to Problem Set 1, Spring 2012 Department of Computer Science, University of Virginia

T. Background material: Topology

Point-Set Topology 1. TOPOLOGICAL SPACES AND CONTINUOUS FUNCTIONS

MC 302 GRAPH THEORY 10/1/13 Solutions to HW #2 50 points + 6 XC points

6c Lecture 3 & 4: April 8 & 10, 2014

Technische Universität München Zentrum Mathematik

In this chapter, we define limits of functions and describe some of their properties.

MAT 3271: Selected Solutions to the Assignment 6

CHAPTER 8. Copyright Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Topology Homework 3. Section Section 3.3. Samuel Otten

An Investigation of the Planarity Condition of Grötzsch s Theorem

MATH 54 - LECTURE 4 DAN CRYTSER

2 A topological interlude

CSC Discrete Math I, Spring Sets

Lecture : Topological Space

Final Exam, F11PE Solutions, Topology, Autumn 2011

Generell Topologi. Richard Williamson. May 27, 2013

2. Metric and Topological Spaces

3. Determine whether f is a function from the set of all bit strings to the set of integers if

Chapter 1. Preliminaries

Introduction to Sets and Logic (MATH 1190)

COMPUTABILITY THEORY AND RECURSIVELY ENUMERABLE SETS

Homework Set #2 Math 440 Topology Topology by J. Munkres

MATH 1A MIDTERM 1 (8 AM VERSION) SOLUTION. (Last edited October 18, 2013 at 5:06pm.) lim

It is important that you show your work. There are 134 points available on this test.

Bounded subsets of topological vector spaces

Function f. Function f -1

MATH 54 - LECTURE 10

ON THE EMPTY CONVEX PARTITION OF A FINITE SET IN THE PLANE**

Point-Set Topology II

Slides for Faculty Oxford University Press All rights reserved.

CSE101: Design and Analysis of Algorithms. Ragesh Jaiswal, CSE, UCSD

8 Matroid Intersection

Technische Universität München Zentrum Mathematik

M3P1/M4P1 (2005) Dr M Ruzhansky Metric and Topological Spaces Summary of the course: definitions, examples, statements.

Logic and Discrete Mathematics. Section 2.5 Equivalence relations and partitions

Indicate the option which most accurately completes the sentence.

Pebble Sets in Convex Polygons

Chapter 3. Set Theory. 3.1 What is a Set?

QED Q: Why is it called the triangle inequality? A: Analogue with euclidean distance in the plane: picture Defn: Minimum Distance of a code C:

Notes for Recitation 8

1 Matchings in Graphs

Propositional Logic. Andreas Klappenecker

INTRODUCTION TO TOPOLOGY

Lecture 7: the quotient topology

Johns Hopkins Math Tournament Proof Round: Point Set Topology

Metric and metrizable spaces

Topology Proceedings. COPYRIGHT c by Topology Proceedings. All rights reserved.

Topology. Min Yan. May 17, 2002

Lecture 11 COVERING SPACES

2. Sets. 2.1&2.2: Sets and Subsets. Combining Sets. c Dr Oksana Shatalov, Fall

A GRAPH FROM THE VIEWPOINT OF ALGEBRAIC TOPOLOGY

Lecture - 8A: Subbasis of Topology

γ(ɛ) (a, b) (a, d) (d, a) (a, b) (c, d) (d, d) (e, e) (e, a) (e, e) (a) Draw a picture of G.

Continuous functions and homeomorphisms

Math 5801 General Topology and Knot Theory

The set consisting of all natural numbers that are in A and are in B is the set f1; 3; 5g;

A greedy, partially optimal proof of the Heine-Borel Theorem

.Math 0450 Honors intro to analysis Spring, 2009 Notes #4 corrected (as of Monday evening, 1/12) some changes on page 6, as in .

Lecture 4: examples of topological spaces, coarser and finer topologies, bases and closed sets

4. Definition: topological space, open set, topology, trivial topology, discrete topology.

Let A(x) be x is an element of A, and B(x) be x is an element of B.

Lecture 6: Faces, Facets

Topology problem set Integration workshop 2010

Math 102A Hw 3 P a (2 points)

Topology 550A Homework 3, Week 3 (Corrections: February 22, 2012)

PS Geometric Modeling Homework Assignment Sheet I (Due 20-Oct-2017)

Transcription:

Cardinality Lectures Enrique Treviño March 8, 014 1 Definition of cardinality The cardinality of a set is a measure of the size of a set. When a set A is finite, its cardinality is the number of elements of the set, usually denoted by A. When the set is infinite, comparing if two sets have the same size is a little different. Georg Cantor in the late 1800s came out with the following idea to compare infinite sets: Definition 1. Let A and B be sets. We say A = B if and only if there exists a bijective function f : A B. Note that the definition also works for finite sets, because if A and B are finite sets and f : A B is a bijection, then A = B. Here are two other definitions that work for finite and infinite sets: Definition. Let A and B be sets. We say A B if and only if there exists an onto function f : A B or B is empty). Definition 3. Let A and B be sets. We say A B if there exists a one-to-one function f : A B or if A is empty). These definitions extend naturally to the following: A > B if A B and A B, i.e., there exists an onto function from A to B, but no bijection exists from A to B. A < B if A B and A B, i.e., there exists a one-to-one function from A to B, but no bijection exists from A to B. Note: For simplicity, in the rest of the article we will avoid considering the empty set. Adding an extra line to prove things for the empty set is easy in all the coming propositions and theorems, but to be brief I will refrain from adding those lines in the proofs. 1

Infinite sets versus finite sets Let s check if our definitions pass the eyeball-test by checking if an infinite set is indeed larger than a finite set: Proposition 1. Let A be an infinite set and B be a finite set. Then A > B. Proof. To prove the proposition we need to show that an onto function exists from A to B, yet there is no bijection from A to B. Let s start by building an onto function. Since B is finite, B = n for some n N, therefore B = {b 1, b,..., b n } for some b 1, b,... b n. Since A is infinite, it has at least n elements, label these n elements a 1, a,... a n. Let f : A B be defined as b i if a = a i for i = 1,,..., n fa) = otherwise. b 1 Clearly f is a function and its image is B, so f is onto. This proves that A B. Now, let s prove that A = B. For the sake of contradiction, suppose A = B, i.e., suppose that there exists a bijection g : A B. Since A is infinite, then it has at least n + 1 elements, label these a 1, a,..., a n, a n+1. Since g is one-to-one, then ga 1 ), ga ),... ga n+1 ) are all different, so the size of B must be at least n + 1. But the size of B is n. This contradicts our assumption that A = B. Since cardinality tries to measure size, it would be nice to show that a subset of another set has smaller cardinality. That s what the next proposition says: Proposition. If A and B are sets and A B, then A B. Proof. Let f : A B be the function fa) = a for a A. f is one-to-one because fa) = fb) = a = b. Since f is one-to-one by definition A B.

3 Examples of bijections between infinite sets Proposition 3. The interval 0, 1) has the same cardinality as the interval 0, 7). Proof. Let f : 0, 1) 0, 7) be defined by fx) = 7x. Let s prove f is a bijection. To prove that f is a bijection we must show a) that f is one-to-one, and b) that f is onto. Let s show that f is one-to-one: Let fa) = fb), then 7a = 7b, so a = b. Therefore f is one-to-one. Let s show that f is onto: Suppose b 0, 7). Let a = b/7, then fa) = 7b/7) = b and a 0, 1), so b is in the image of f. Since b is arbitrary, then f is onto. Since f is one-to-one and f is onto, f is a bijection. Since f is a bijection, the intervals 0, 1) and 0, 7) have the same cardinality. Proposition 4. The interval π, π ) has the same cardinality as R. Proof. To prove that the sets have the same cardinality we must find a bijec- tion between them. I claim that fx) = tanx is a bijection from π, π ) to R. Let s start by showing it is one-to-one. Suppose fa) = fb). Then tan a = tan b where a and b are in the interval π, π ). Therefore a and b are angles between π/ and π/. Since tan a = tan b and they are angles with that restriction, then a = b. Now let s show f is onto. Let x be a real number. We need to show there exists an a π, π ) such that fa) = x, i.e., such that tan a = x. Let a = arctan x. Then tan a = x. We need only verify that a is between π/ and π/. But the arctan function has range π, π ), so a must be between π/ and π/. This concludes the proof. A more illustrative proof is the graph of fx) = tan x Figure 1). 3

Figure 1: Note that in the graph, any horizontal line intersects the graph at most once, which means the function is one-to-one. Also note that every horizontal line intersects the graph, so every y value has at least one x value. This means the function is onto. Proposition 5. The set of even integers has the same cardinality as the set of integers. Proof. Let Z be the set of even integers. Let f : Z Z be the function fn) = n. f is one-to-one because if fm) = fn), then m = n and hence m = n. f is onto because if n is an even integer, then n = m for some integer m by the definition of even integer) and hence fm) = n. So all even integers are in the image of f, so f is onto. 4

4 Cardinality is an equivalence relation In this section we will prove that the cardinality relation is an equivalence relation. We say two sets A and B are related by cardinality if A = B. First note that any set A satisfies A = A, because f : A A defined by fa) = a is a bijection. Therefore the cardinality relation is reflexive. That cardinality is symmetric is not obvious, but it s not hard to prove. Suppose A = B, therefore there exists a bijection f : A B. Since f is one-to-one then f 1 : Imf) A is a bijection it s one-to-one and onto by definition of f 1 ). Since f is onto, then Imf) = B, therefore f 1 is a bijection from B to A. Therefore B = A. Transitivity is a bit harder to prove. Proving transitivity boils down to showing that given a bijection from A to B and another bijection from B to C, there exists a bijection from A to C. We prove that in the following proposition where we go even further and prove that the composition of two bijections is a bijection): Proposition 6. Let f : A B and g : B C be bijections, then g f : A C is a bijection. Proof. Let s start by proving that g f is one-to-one. Suppose g fa) = g fb). Then gfa)) = gfb)). Since g is one-to-one, this implies fa) = fb). Since f is one-to-one, a = b. Therefore g f is one-to-one. Let s now prove that g f is onto. Suppose c C. Since c C and g is onto, there exists b B such that gb) = c. Since b B and f is onto, there exists an a A such that fa) = b. Therefore gfa)) = c, i.e., g fa) = c. Since g f is one-to-one and onto, it is a bijection. Since cardinality is reflexive, symmetric and transitive, then it is an equivalence relation. 5