Broadband for Louisa County. Building the Future

Similar documents
Telecommunications Update 2/8/2017

Staff Subcommittee on Telecommunications

The State of Broadband in Virginia. Caroline Stolle Center for Innovative Technology

PROPONENT TESTIMONY BEFORE THE HOUSE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMITTEE HB402 Tuesday, January 23, 2018 JOSH MOTZER PUBLIC POLICY DIRECTOR CENTURYLINK

WIRELESS BROADBAND Supplemental Broadband Solution

Federal Funding for Broadband Access & Adoption: New Policy, New Market Dynamics

WHY DON T WE HAVE BETTER BROADBAND? What s Standing in the Way?

Person County Telecom Inventory Update

Broadband Opportunities and Challenges in the United States

FIBER OPTIC RESOURCE SHARING IN VIRGINIA

Broadband and Counties101 Abbey Bryduck

Broadband Strategies: Linking Wisconsin to the Global Marketplace

The Next Generation of Telecom. What does the future look like in 2030?

Improving Internet Connectivity in Rural West Virginia

Illinois Broadband Opportunity Partnership (IBOP) Monthly Summary. January 2014

Agricultural Outlook Forum February 21-22, 2008 U.S. Department of Agriculture

Broadband Availability and Adoption: A State Perspective

City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiber Optic Master Plan

MTA Company Overview. Formed in 1953 Over 10,000 Square Miles

Southern Tier Network, Inc.

Spectrum Scarcity: Fact or Fiction?

Rural Trends in Bridging the Digital Divide. NADO s Washington Policy Conference April 6, 2016 Jessica J. Golden

Sichuan Telecom. All-seeing with all-optical. Winners

Where we are now. How we got here. Future Options. Opportunities & Challenges

AEC Broadband Update 2018

Driving Canada s digital future

Seeking understanding of priorities and goals

Broadband Case Study: Anza Electric Cooperative

Memorandum. To: Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Staff. From: Fall River Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc. Date: 3/6/2014

Cable Franchise Fees and Other Telecommunications Revenue Sources. Council-Staff Topics May 3, 2018

LEVERAGE A WIRELESS BROADBAND INFRASTRUCTURE TO Open New Revenue Streams

Access from AT&T, CAFII and Small Cells

STATE BROADBAND ACTION PLAN MAY 2015 Nevada Economic Development Conference PREPARED BY CONNECT NEVADA AND THE NEVADA BROADBAND TASK FORCE

Shentel will ensure that rural communities have access to the same level of telecommunication services as those found anywhere else in the US.

Broadband Technology Opportunities Program (BTOP) Comprehensive Community Infrastructure (CCI) Grant Application

Dynamic Time Metered Delivery (DTMD): Potential Effect on the Goals of the Federal Communications Commission's National Broadband Plan!

fibre loop extensions to help mitigate the impact of accidental fibre cuts in rural and remote areas.

Delivering On Canada s Broadband Commitment Presentation to OECD/WPIE Public Sector Broadband Procurement Workshop December 4, 2002

Industry Update. View of the WISP Market. January, 2018

NATIONAL BROADBAND POLICY AND IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY. Task Team Leader

The Emerging World of Broadband Public Private Partnerships. February 24, 2016 Coalition for Local Internet Choice

Your network s path to its fiber future. Grow confidently with fiber solutions from an experienced partner

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF STATE UTILITY CONSUMER ADVOCATES. Resolution

Technology in Ohio: The Past, Present, and Future. Ice Miller LLP

Information Technology Paul Kronberger, Chief Information Officer

Next Generation Broadband South of Scotland and Highlands and Islands

Pulse Broadband: Making Rural Fiber Work By Mitch Shapiro

City of Ketchum Broadband Strategic Plan Executive Summary Report September 12, 2013

Dr. Brian Whitacre Professor and Extension Economist Oklahoma State University

2015 Governor s Northern Wisconsin Economic Development Summit

APPENDIX D SUMMARY OF FEDERAL AND PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT FUNDING FOR BROADBAND ACCESS

Frugal 5G : Connecting the Unconnected World!

Thinking differently: learning & bridging broadband gaps in rural areas

Business & Technology Advisory June 2018

MOFFAT COUNTY STRATEGIC BROADBAND PLAN

Where Can I Get My Internet? The difference between dark fiber, lit internet service, and who can use it.

Economic issues of (broadband) access networks. C. Courcoubetis

June 25, Ms. Marlene Dortch Secretary Federal Communications Commission th Street, SW Room TW-A325 Washington, D.C.

Prepared Testimony of. Bohdan R. Pankiw. Chief Counsel Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission. before the

BROADBAND TECHNOLOGY FOR RESIDENTS OF ACCOMACK AND NORTHAMPTON COUNTY A study commissioned by the Eastern Shore of Virginia Broadband Authority

Strategic Models for State & Regional Broadband Development. Internet2 Fall Member Meeting Raleigh, NC 5 October 2011

HABERSHAM COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Frugal 5G Test-bed: A Case Study of Palghar Experiment

FCC Form Carrier Annual Reporting Data Collection Form

Request for Proposal Retail Internet Service Providers for Open Access Network

Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Information Collection; Comment Request; Broadband Availability Data

Fiber Optics and Economic Development in Allegany County: presentation to the Chamber of Commerce. July 22, 2012

2014 NASCIO Recognition Award Nomination

Frenemies and Free Riders

NATIONAL BROADBAND PLANS COMMONWEALTH BROADBAND ASIA FORUM SEPTEMBER 2016

THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK

White Space in the Real World Update on Carlson TVWS Trials James Carlson, CEO

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

Request for Information. Services, Operations, and Maintenance of City-Built Fiber Optic Network. City of Westminster

WIMAX. WIMAX (Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access ): Field of application:

Lakeland FLORIDA S FIRST. Human Resources GIGABIT CITY WHY? Keith Merritt Commissioner February 16, 2015

EMERGING ISSUES IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF A NATIONAL BROADBAND PLAN

Leveraging the Regulatory Data Into Tomorrow s Environments. Sponsored by the Associate Member Committee

Mapping to the National Broadband Plan

Regional Meeting for the Asia-Pacific LDCs Towards Graduation: A Focus on Broadband and Connectivity

Oregon Universal Service Fund How the OUSF Currently Functions

Broadband is a Crucial Ingredient

Broadband via Satellite

THE ECONOMIC CASE FOR BRINGING BROADBAND TO THE RURAL US

California s Public Libraries and CENIC: Frequently Asked Questions

RURAL CONNECTIVITY IN AFRICA. Nicolas BARAVALLE Director Line of Business Data

New York State Broadband Public Informational Meeting. December 12, 2017

York Region Telecom Policy Update

Telecom Workshop Board of Commissioners Jefferson County PUD. Joel Paisner Ascent Law Partners, LLP August 9, 2016

Broadband Case Study: Roanoke Electric Cooperative

Understanding the Japanese Broadband Miracle

Broadband Deployment Data - Moving Beyond Form 477

Gram Marg: Enabling Rural Connectivity

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

In public safety, ESInets are a game changer

How to Succeed In Wireless Backhaul. A Whitepaper: State of the Industry and Suggestions for Success

Indosat Company Profile. Investor Relations & Corporate Secretary

Hampton Roads Regional Broadband Strategy Briefing to Virginia Beach City Council Aug 15, Dave Hansen City Manager

Connecticut Department of Department of Administrative Services and the Broadband Technology Opportunity Program (BTOP) 8/20/2012 1

Executive Summary. Background. DATE: March 5, Kit Carson Electric Cooperative. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Staff

Transcription:

Broadband for Louisa County Building the Future

How Rural is Louisa? Louisa County 34,000 residents 14,000 households 511 square miles Fairfax County 1.1 million residents 400,000 households 406 square miles Density outside of population centers: < 60 residents per square mile Population density: 2,750 residents per square mile

Broadband Research and Planning Possible broadband distribution technologies: Possible business models: Fiber optic cable (in-ground or aerial) Wireless distribution options Existing telephone and cable TV cabling New coaxial cabling Power lines Passive investor Infrastructure provider Direct service provider

Broadband Research and Planning Possible broadband distribution technologies: Fiber optic cable (in-ground or aerial) Wireless distribution options Possible business models: Infrastructure provider

Fiber and Wireless Fiber Technological lifetime: 30 years Data capacity: very large (>10,000 Mbps) Middle-mile cost: $15,000 - $65,000/mile Last-mile cost: very high (linear) Wireless Technological lifetime: 5 years Data capacity: large (300-1,000 Mbps) Middle-mile cost: $1,000/mile Last-mile cost: low (non-linear)

Potential Partners Federal Grants (FCC, Senator Warner, etc.) State Grants (VHDA, DHCD, etc.) Private Grants Commercial Firms

Louisa Must Build Phase One Universal feedback from Federal, State, and Private entities

What is Phase One? Ten distribution towers: Middle-mile transport service: 180 height Power Network equipment Up to 10 vertical locations Downlink capability for wireline 3-mile local service radius Distribution service to local towers beyond 3 miles 300 Mbps initial capacity Expandable to 1,000 Mbps

Direct Return on Investment Direct revenues Minimal returns for co-location on towers Small returns for transport service Adequate to offset continued maintenance and operation Does not provide a direct investment return to Louisa County

Indirect Return on Investment Rural Louisa does not have Internet service Reduced desirability for prospective residents and businesses Loss of educational, commercial, and job opportunities for citizens Internet analogous to roads - 21 st century distribution Electronic textbooks B2B and B2C transactions Telecommuting Citizen engagement

Phase One Costs $1.1 million Capital Expense for construction

Phase One Projections Projected Annual Operational Expenses: $53,000 Projected Annual Revenues: $45,000 - $60,000

Phase One Bottom Line Wireless backhaul and lease revenues will not return the initial infrastructure investment to Louisa County

What about LCPS fiber? Louisa County Public Schools have requested federal funding for fiber construction between schools. If approved, LCBA could include fiber in their construction at a greatly-reduced cost. However, all construction costs associated with Phase One remain for last-mile distribution to consumers. Therefore, we do not consider fiber backhaul deployment a criticalpath Phase One step.

What is Phase Two? Option I: Wireless Provider Adoption: high Wired Provider Adoption: some Phase Two: Grant funding for fiber Option II: Wireless Provider Adoption: high Wired Provider Adoption: none Phase Two: Grant funding for fiber backhauls; use revenues to build local towers Option III: Wireless Provider Adoption: low Wired Provider Adoption: none Phase Two: Seek grants and publicprivate partnerships to increase wireless rollouts Option IV: Wireless Provider Adoption: minimal Wired Provider Adoption: none Phase Two: Seek grants and funding to provide service directly to residents and businesses in Louisa

What is Phase One? Proof-of-Commitment for federal, state, and private grants Middle-mile transport (backhaul) service from ten locations capable of blanketing Louisa County so that all residents can have access Flexible technological solution that incorporates potential service expansion from LCPS efforts and private entities Minimum Viable Investment Louisa County can make to reach Phase Two

Louisa County Broadband Authority We plan to request Phase One funding of $1.1 million from the Louisa County Board of Supervisors. Our charter is to increase access to broadband Internet for citizens of Louisa County. Our goal today is to ensure that the Board of Supervisors has the information it needs to make a funding decision.