Teen Driving & Distracted Driving. Strategies To Save Lives. NCSL December 9, 2010

Similar documents
PRESS RELEASE. Manteca Police Department to Step Up Enforcement for Distracted Drivers

Distracted Driving Accident Claims Involving Mobile Devices Special Considerations and New Frontiers in Legal Liability

Why driving while using hands-free cell phones is risky behavior. Drivers through Better Training

Alaska no no all drivers primary. Arizona no no no not applicable. primary: texting by all drivers but younger than

STATEMENT OF AAA NEW YORK STATE BEFORE THE SENATE STANDING COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION ALBANY, NEW YORK FEBRUARY 13, 2012

Model State Driver Distraction Plan. Ford Motor Company

Amy Schick NHTSA, Occupant Protection Division April 7, 2011

Cell Phone Use & Driving Impact on Employee Safety, Productivity and Employer Liability

Don t Drive Distracted. Attorney Joe Troy

Instructions For Cell Phone Use While Driving In Illinois Law Prohibiting

Review of distracted driving factors. George Yannis, Associate Professor, NTUA

AVOID DISTRACTIONS WHILE DRIVING

Nashville MTA: Distracted Driving Bob Baulsir. Metropolitan Transit Authority General Manager of Administration Nashville, TN

A Study of Distracted Driving in New Jersey 2016

4/11/2014 OVERVIEW LIFESAVERS CONFERENCE NASHVILLE, TN Speaking With Teens About Distracted Driving

Driver interactions with mobile phones. Driving performance and safety implications

Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance DISTRACTIVE DRIVING

Distracted Driving: Avoid Becoming A Statistic

ITSMR RESEARCH NOTE EFFECTS OF CELL PHONE USE AND OTHER DRIVER DISTRACTIONS ON HIGHWAY SAFETY: 2006 UPDATE. Introduction SUMMARY

DISTRACTION & INJURY: HOLDING BACK THE TIDE DISCLOSURE & ACCREDITATION

DISTRACTED DRIVING. The Biggest Issue in Driving Today

Distracted Driving. Applicable Regulations. Introduction/Overview

J.D. Power and Associates Reports: Overall Wireless Network Problem Rates Differ Considerably Based on Type of Usage Activity

Distracted Driving Education for High School Students. Despina Stavrinos, PhD & Benjamin McManus

ITSMR Research Note. Crashes Involving Cell Phone Use and Distracted Driving KEY FINDINGS ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION. Crash Analyses.

Distracted Driving & Voice-to-Text Overview. Christine Yager Texas A&M Transportation Institute

Cell Phones & Distracted Driving

UC Berkeley Research Reports

Distracted Driving. EMEA Claims Conference EMEA Claims Conference Rüschlikon, March 6th & 7th 2018 Marion Villalobos, Constanze Brand

CHART BOOK: HAND-HELD MOBILE DEVICE USE TRENDS FOR MISSISSIPPI ADULTS

A STUDY OF NEW JERSEY DISTRACTED DRIVING

Cell Phones & Distracted Driving

C.A.S.E. Community Partner Application

Distracted Driving Accident Claims Involving Mobile Devices Special Considerations and New Frontiers in Legal Liability

ITSMR Research Note KEY FINDINGS. Crash Analyses: Ticket Analyses:

Objectives DISCLOSURE INFORMATION

Driver Distraction: Problems, Progress, Priorities Mike Perel

MSMC PRESENTS. Distracted Driving Laws in Michigan Talking to Our Kids. (800)

If you knew the #1 killer in American teenagers, would you try to stop it?

Distracted Driving Community Presentation

Manufactured Home Production by Product Mix ( )

Gregory M. Fitch, Ph.D. AAMVA AIC August 22, 2011

Global Road Safety Partnership

Road and Street Maintenance Supervisors Conference

Driving While Distracted

Chart 2: e-waste Processed by SRD Program in Unregulated States

Georgia Struck-By Alliance presents Highway Work Zone Safety Stand Down. Work Zone Safety: We re All in This Together

Summary of the State Elder Abuse. Questionnaire for Hawaii

Along for the Ride Reducing Driver Distractions

Changing Employee Behavior: Distracted Driving. Del Lisk Vice President, Safety Services Lytx, Inc.

Driver Distraction Recent Results: 100 Car Re-Analysis / Teen / Commercial Truck Studies

THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN CELL PHONE RESTRICTIONS AND YOUNG DRIVERS SELF REPORTED CELL PHONE USE

37 FAQs ABOUT CELLCONTROL ASKED BY PARENTS OF NEW DRIVERS

Minimizing Unintended Risks From Today's Mobile Workforce

Oklahoma Economic Outlook 2015

Summary of the State Elder Abuse. Questionnaire for Alaska

Zendrive s 2018 Distracted Driving Snapshot

Distracted Driving- A Review of Relevant Research and Latest Findings

Kutztown University of Pennsylvania PASSHE Alumni Satisfaction Survey Results Population: Alumni who graduated in

User Experience Task Force

Wireless Network Data Speeds Improve but Not Incidence of Data Problems, J.D. Power Finds

Oklahoma Economic Outlook 2016

Traffic Safety Facts Research Note


Ted C. Jones, PhD Chief Economist

AVOID DISTRACTED DRIVING!

What's Next for Clean Water Act Jurisdiction

TEXTING WHILE DRIVING

WHAT CAN BE DONE? MICHIGAN TRANSPORTATION PLANNERS ASSOCIATION 2011 CONFERENCE JIM SANTILLI EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AT THE TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION

CITY OF DUBUQUE ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY REVISED OCTOBER 24, 2011 RETROACTIVE TO JANUARY 1, 2011

Managing Transportation Research with Databases and Spreadsheets: Survey of State Approaches and Capabilities

Distracted Driving. Trends, Challenges, Solutions. Georgia House Distracted Driving Committee Atlanta, GA August 28, 2017

California s Hands-Free Law: Will It Make a Difference? Jed Kolko

Summary of the State Elder Abuse. Questionnaire for Nebraska

VEHICLE SAFETY. MBMA Lunch and Learn Webinar December 13 th 12:00PM CST Presenter: MBMA Safety Committee

Alaska ATU 1 $13.85 $4.27 $ $ Tandem Switching $ Termination

4/25/2013. Bevan Erickson VP, Marketing

DATES OF EVENT: Conference: March 31 April 2, 2009 Exhibits: April 1 3, Sands Expo & Convention Center, Las Vegas, NV

Arizona does not currently have this ability, nor is it part of the new system in development.

Summary of the State Elder Abuse. Questionnaire for Texas

Instructions For Cell Phone Use In School Zone Arkansas Laws

Alaska ATU 1 $13.85 $4.27 $ $ Tandem Switching $ Termination

Texting and driving. Texting and Driving Report Angel Reyes

the New York Public Transit

N.J. drivers continue to roll the dice with safety

Telephone Appends. White Paper. September Prepared by

Levels of Measurement. Data classing principles and methods. Nominal. Ordinal. Interval. Ratio. Nominal: Categorical measure [e.g.

12/3/2018 MOTOR VEHICLE CRASHES A BIG DEAL CELL PHONE USE & DRIVING CRITICAL REASONS FOR CRASHES DRIVING DISTRACTIONS

"DISTRACTED DRIVING"

Policing our Roads Together

Crop Progress. Corn Emerged - Selected States [These 18 States planted 92% of the 2016 corn acreage]

DATES OF EVENT: Conference: March 23 March 25, 2010 Exhibits: March 24 March 26, Sands Expo & Convention Center, Las Vegas, NV

MapMarker Standard 10.0 Release Notes

Mobile Apps - Privacy and Policy Issues

Reporting Child Abuse Numbers by State

Investigating Driver Distraction and Drowsiness using Naturalistic Driving Data

Is your standard BASED on the IACA standard, or is it a complete departure from the. If you did consider. using the IACA

Panel Discussion Elements of Model Distracted Driving Programs

THE CCPA AND PREPARING FOR STATE PRIVACY LEGISLATION. Nathan Taylor Morrison & Foerster LLP

Commission Rate Schedule

Transcription:

Teen Driving & Distracted Driving Strategies To Save Lives NCSL December 9, 2010

National Safety Council 18,000 Organizational Members at 54,000 locations 38 state and local chapters 20,000 training agencies Mission: Save lives by preventing injuries and deaths at work, in homes and communities, and on the roads through leadership, research, education and advocacy.

Teen Driving

NSC and Teen Driving NSC sponsored International Symposia on Graduated Driver Licensing in 2002 and 2007. NSC and its chapters have been engaged in legislative activity in several states. NSC member companies are educating their employees/parents of teen drivers about GDL. NSC currently building state coalitions in 14 states.

Teen Driving-Related Deaths Includes teen drivers, their passengers and third parties 9000 Annual teen driving-related deaths declined 36% from 2003-2009. 8000 7000 6000 5000 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Graduated Driver Licensing: Maximizes experience and minimizes risks 1 st Stage Learners Permit (12 months) Minimum hours of supervised practice driving. 2 nd Stage Intermediate (6 months) Night driving and passenger restrictions. Belt use, zero tolerance for alcohol use, total ban on all cell phone use 3 rd Stage Full License through age 18 Belt use, zero tolerance for alcohol use, total ban on all cell phone use

7 Elements of Comprehensive GDL Learners permit period of at least nine months. Minimum of required practice driving hours. Restriction on night driving after 10 pm during first year of licensure. Restriction on passengers for first year of licensure. Prohibition on all cell phone use while driving. Primary enforcement of seat belt laws. Zero tolerance for alcohol use.

GDL: A Proven Vaccine Impact of GDL Laws on Teen Crashes Moving from 0 to 1 GDL element: 4% crash reduction 1 to 2: 6.25% reduction 2 to 3: 0% reduction 3 to 4 GDL: 12% reduction 4 to 5 or more: 21% crash reduction Net Effect: States with Comprehensive GDL have up to 43% fewer teen crashes than states with no GDL.

What Parents Think About GDL North Carolina Survey 96% overall opinion of GDL is approve or highly approve 87% agree with 9 pm night time restriction. 86% agree with 12 month learners permit period.

What Parents Think About GDL Iowa Survey of 1,065 parents of 16 & 17-year old drivers 97% support bans on texting while driving. 90% support bans on all cell phone use while driving. 82% support moving the night time restriction from 12 am to 10 pm. 79% support restricting teen drivers to no more than 1 passenger (with exceptions for relatives). 57% support extending the supervised practice period from 6 to 12 months.

Urban vs. Rural North Carolina, Iowa, Kansas No significant difference in parental support for GDL between urban and rural parents. Majority of rural parents and urban parents in every state support every element of GDL in their states.

Teens Also Support GDL North Carolina teen survey 81% agree or strongly agree with 9 pm. night driving restriction. 59% have overall positive opinion of GDL.

States Adoption of Comprehensive GDL 8 states have 5 or more elements. These states have generally seen reductions in teen crashes of 20-45%. 34 states have 3 or fewer elements.

National Safety Council Taking Action Active in 12+ states to educate and engage parents, teens and advocates, earn media interest, build support for GDL. Allstate-funded coalitions: California, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas. CDC-funded coalitions in Florida and Ohio, plus support other CDC coalitions in Iowa, New Hampshire, North Dakota, South Dakota. NSC legislative advocacy in Iowa, Florida, Pennsylvania, +1.

National Safety Council Taking Action Advocating for Federal GDL bill to provide incentives to states. Raising $10 million for teen driving strategies to include national parent education initiative to reach far more parents than are currently being reached.

Distracted Driving

NSC and Distracted Driving Beginning in 2001, NSC members and volunteers became concerned with research showing risks of cell phone use while driving. Consistency of research from multiple research methods and convergence of data led NSC members in the transportation industry to propose an official policy. Representatives of all industry groups involved. In January 2009, NSC became first national organization to call for total bans on all cell phone use while driving. Today, 500+ NSC members have their own total bans covering nearly 2 million employees.

Types of Driver Distractions Visual Eyes off road Most are for short durations of 1-2 seconds (billboards, dashboard glances, GPS maps, scenery). Generally low crash risk of 0-1.5x. Mechanical Hand off wheel Most do not significantly affect driving (eating, drinking, tuning radio). Low crash risk of 0-1.6x. Combinations of Visual & Mechanical Moderately increased risk (handling or retrieving object, such as CD, mobile device, personal grooming). Crash risk of up to 3.8x.

Types of Driver Distractions Cognitive Distraction Mind off driving Higher risk than hands off wheel or eyes off road due to brain overload and selective attention. Principal deficiencies in driving are slower response times, following distance, and missed traffic signals. Higher crash risk: Cell phone use while driving -- 4x crash risk. Combinations of Visual, Mechanical & Cognitive Generally highest crash risks of 8x up to 23x, associated with activities like reading and texting.

Measuring Cognitive Distraction Simulator studies have identified specific impairment related to inattention blindness and tunnel vision. A study in a community-like driving range showed drivers on cell phones had higher rates of missed traffic signals and poor recognition of their behavior. A naturalistic study of 56,000 drivers at intersections showed that drivers on cell phones (hand-held and hands-free) missed 2x more traffic signals than people not on phones.

Translating Risk Into Crashes While some activities are higher risk than others, they do not necessarily cause more crashes, injuries or deaths. How many crashes occur due to a specific behavior is a function of the level of risk and the prevalence of the activity. Risk: How risky is it? Prevalence: How many people are doing it for what period of time?

Texting: Risk + Prevalence Risk: Increased risk of injury from texting while driving: 8x up to 23x. Prevalence: 0.6% of drivers at any one time are manipulating hand-held devices. The number texting is lower than that. Result: Minimum of 100,000 crashes, or 2% of all crashes, involve texting.

Cell Phone Use: Risk + Prevalence Risk: Increased risk of injury from using a cell phone while driving: 4x Prevalence: 10% of drivers at any one time, or more than 700,000 drivers, observed using handheld devices. The number engaged in conversations is likely higher as hands-free is not measured in observation surveys. Result: 1.2 million crashes/year or 21% of all crashes, involve cell phone use.

63% of Voters Support Laws Banning All Cell Phone Use While Driving

National Safety Council Taking Action Advocating for state laws. Advocating for inclusion of distracted driving research and incentives to states in Transportation Reauthorization. Working with employers to enact policies and measure their impact. Evaluating technology solutions that manage all incoming/outgoing calls and messages without driver involvement.

Conclusions 1. Strong laws, vigorously enforced, are essential to reduce crashes, prevent injuries and save lives on our roads. For a majority of Americans Education, by itself, does not change behavior. 2. A significant majority of American voters support most traffic safety laws (drunk driving, primary seat belt laws, motorcycle helmets). A majority also supports GDL and total cell phone bans. 3. Despite public support, 42 states do not have comprehensive GDL and no state has a total ban on cell phone use while driving.

How Can We Be Helpful? How can advocacy groups help legislators enact necessary safety legislation that saves lives? How can state coalitions of businesses, health and safety groups, victims advocates and others be helpful?