Deadlocks. Bridge Crossing Example. The Problem of Deadlock. Deadlock Characterization. Resource-Allocation Graph. System Model

Similar documents
CS307 Operating Systems Deadlocks

The Deadlock Problem

Chapter 7: Deadlocks

Module 7: Deadlocks. The Deadlock Problem

Chapter 8: Deadlocks

Chapter 8: Deadlocks. The Deadlock Problem. System Model. Bridge Crossing Example. Resource-Allocation Graph. Deadlock Characterization

Chapter 7: Deadlocks. Chapter 7: Deadlocks. The Deadlock Problem. Chapter Objectives. System Model. Bridge Crossing Example

Chapter 7: Deadlocks

Chapter 7: Deadlocks. Operating System Concepts 8 th Edition,

CS307: Operating Systems

Module 7: Deadlocks. The Deadlock Problem. Bridge Crossing Example. System Model

Chapter 7: Deadlocks. Operating System Concepts 9 th Edition

Module 7: Deadlocks. System Model. Deadlock Characterization. Methods for Handling Deadlocks. Deadlock Prevention. Deadlock Avoidance

Chapter 7 : 7: Deadlocks Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne 2009 Operating System Concepts 8th Edition, Chapter 7: Deadlocks

Chapter 8: Deadlocks. The Deadlock Problem

Chapter 7: Deadlocks. Operating System Concepts with Java 8 th Edition

CSE Opera+ng System Principles

Chapter 7: Deadlocks

Deadlock Prevention. Restrain the ways request can be made. Mutual Exclusion not required for sharable resources; must hold for nonsharable resources.

Deadlocks. Deadlock Overview

UNIT-5 Q1. What is deadlock problem? Explain the system model of deadlock.

Lecture 7 Deadlocks (chapter 7)

Chapter 7: Deadlocks

Chapter 8: Deadlocks. Operating System Concepts with Java

CMSC 412. Announcements

Chapter 7: Deadlocks. Operating System Concepts 8 th Edition,! Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne 2009!

Principles of Operating Systems

System Model. Types of resources Reusable Resources Consumable Resources

Deadlocks. Jinkyu Jeong Computer Systems Laboratory Sungkyunkwan University

COP 4610: Introduction to Operating Systems (Spring 2016) Chapter 7 Deadlocks. Zhi Wang Florida State University

Deadlock. Concepts to discuss. A System Model. Deadlock Characterization. Deadlock: Dining-Philosophers Example. Deadlock: Bridge Crossing Example

Deadlock Risk Management

Chapter 7: Deadlocks. Operating System Concepts 9 th Edition

Principles of Operating Systems

The Deadlock Problem (1)

Operating Systems 2015 Spring by Euiseong Seo DEAD LOCK

Deadlocks. Operating System Concepts - 7 th Edition, Feb 14, 2005

Chapter 7: Deadlocks. Operating System Concepts 9th Edition DM510-14

Deadlocks. Prepared By: Kaushik Vaghani

Chapter 7: Deadlocks. Operating System Concepts 9 th Edition

CHAPTER 7: DEADLOCKS. By I-Chen Lin Textbook: Operating System Concepts 9th Ed.

ICS Principles of Operating Systems. Lectures Set 5- Deadlocks Prof. Nalini Venkatasubramanian

Bridge Crossing Example

The Slide does not contain all the information and cannot be treated as a study material for Operating System. Please refer the text book for exams.

Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne 2013! CPU cycles, memory space, I/O devices! " Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne 2013!

CHAPTER 7 - DEADLOCKS

CS420: Operating Systems. Deadlocks & Deadlock Prevention

Chapter 8: Deadlocks. The Deadlock Problem

The Deadlock Problem. Chapter 8: Deadlocks. Bridge Crossing Example. System Model. Deadlock Characterization. Resource-Allocation Graph

Chapter 7: Deadlocks. Operating System Concepts 9 th Edition! Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne 2013!

Chapter 7: Deadlocks. Operating System Concepts 8 th Edition,

Roadmap. Safe State. Deadlock Avoidance. Basic Facts. Safe, Unsafe, Deadlock State. Tevfik Koşar. CSC Operating Systems Spring 2007

Chapter 7: Deadlocks. Operating System Concepts 9 th Edition

Roadmap. Deadlock Prevention. Deadlock Prevention (Cont.) Deadlock Detection. Exercise. Tevfik Koşar. CSE 421/521 - Operating Systems Fall 2012

The Deadlock Problem

The Deadlock Problem

Chapter 7: Deadlocks. Operating System Concepts 8th Edition, modified by Stewart Weiss

The Deadlock Problem. A set of blocked processes each holding a resource and waiting to acquire a resource held by another process in the set.

Chapter 8: Deadlocks. The Deadlock Problem

Chapter 7: Deadlocks. Operating System Concepts 9 th Edition

Module 6: Deadlocks. Reading: Chapter 7

CSC Operating Systems Fall Lecture - XII Deadlocks - III. Tevfik Ko!ar. Louisiana State University. October 6 th, 2009

Operating Systems. Designed and Presented by Dr. Ayman Elshenawy Elsefy

Deadlocks. Minsoo Ryu. Real-Time Computing and Communications Lab. Hanyang University.

Deadlocks. Dr. Yingwu Zhu

Chapter 7: Deadlocks CS370 Operating Systems

Chapter 7: Deadlocks. Chapter 7: Deadlocks. Deadlock Example. Chapter Objectives

Chapter 7: Deadlocks. Chapter 7: Deadlocks. System Model. Chapter Objectives

Chapter 7: Deadlocks

Unit-03 Deadlock and Memory Management Unit-03/Lecture-01

Deadlock Risk Management

Chapter 8: Deadlocks. Bridge Crossing Example. The Deadlock Problem

CS370 Operating Systems

Potential Deadlock Example

University of Babylon / College of Information Technology / Network Department. Operating System / Dr. Mahdi S. Almhanna & Dr. Rafah M.

COMP 3713 Operating Systems Slides Part 3. Jim Diamond CAR 409 Jodrey School of Computer Science Acadia University

Deadlock. Operating Systems. Autumn CS4023

Deadlock. Chapter Objectives

CS370 Operating Systems

Chapter - 4. Deadlocks Important Questions

Deadlocks. The Deadlock Problem. Bridge Crossing Example. Topics

OPERATING SYSTEMS. Prescribed Text Book. Operating System Principles, Seventh Edition. Abraham Silberschatz, Peter Baer Galvin and Greg Gagne

UNIT-3 DEADLOCKS DEADLOCKS

The deadlock problem

Introduction to Deadlocks

TDDB68 + TDDD82. Lecture: Deadlocks

Deadlocks. Jin-Soo Kim Computer Systems Laboratory Sungkyunkwan University

Deadlock. A Bit More on Synchronization. The Deadlock Problem. Deadlock Characterization. Operating Systems 2/7/2005. CSC 256/456 - Spring

Operating Systems. Deadlock. Lecture 7 Michael O Boyle

OPERATING SYSTEMS. Deadlocks

CS370 Operating Systems

Deadlocks. System Model

Fall 2015 COMP Operating Systems. Lab 06

Final Exam Review. CPSC 457, Spring 2016 June 29-30, M. Reza Zakerinasab Department of Computer Science, University of Calgary

CS370 Operating Systems

Roadmap. Tevfik Koşar. CSE 421/521 - Operating Systems Fall Lecture - XI Deadlocks - II. University at Buffalo. Deadlocks. October 6 th, 2011

Maximum CPU utilization obtained with multiprogramming. CPU I/O Burst Cycle Process execution consists of a cycle of CPU execution and I/O wait

Resource Allocation and Deadlock Handling

CSC 539: Operating Systems Structure and Design. Spring 2005

Operating systems. Lecture 5. Deadlock: System Model. Deadlock: System Model. Process synchronization Deadlocks. Deadlock: System Model

Transcription:

CS07 Bridge Crossing Example Deadlocks Fan Wu Department of Computer Science and Engineering Shanghai Jiao Tong University Spring 2016 Traffic only in one direction Each section of a bridge can be viewed as a resource A deadlock occurs when two cars get on the bridge from different directions at the same time 2 The Problem of Deadlock Deadlock Characterization Example System has 2 disk drives P 1 and P 2 each hold one disk drive and each needs another one Example semaphores S and Q, initialized to 1 P 0 P 1 1 wait (S); 2 wait (Q); wait (Q); 4 wait (S); Deadlock: A set of blocked processes each holding some resources and waiting to acquire the resources held by another process in the set Deadlock can arise if four conditions hold simultaneously. Mutual exclusion: only one process at a time can use a resource Hold and wait: a process holding at least one resource is waiting to acquire additional resources held by other processes No preemption: a resource can be released only voluntarily by the process holding it, after that process has completed its task Circular wait: there exists a set {P 0, P 1,, P n } of waiting processes such that P 0 is waiting for a resource that is held by P 1, P 1 is waiting for a resource that is held by P 2,, P n 1 is waiting for a resource that is held by P n, and P n is waiting for a resource that is held by P 0. 4 System Model Resource-Allocation Graph Processes P 1, P 2,, P n Deadlocks can be identified with system resourceallocation graph. Resource types R 1, R 2,..., R m e.g., CPU, memory space, I/O devices Each resource type R i has W i instances. Each process utilizes a resource as follows: request use A set of vertices V and a set of edges E. V is partitioned into two types: P = {P 1, P 2,, P n }, the set consisting of all the processes in the system R = {R 1, R 2,, R m }, the set consisting of all resource types in the system P i R j release E has two types: P i request edge directed edge P i R j R j assignment edge directed edge R j P i P i Rj 5 6 1

Example of a Resource Allocation Graph Resource Allocation Graph With A Deadlock P = {P 1, P 2, P } R = {R 1, R 2, R, R 4 } A cycle P 1 R 1 P 2 R P R 2 P 1 Resource instances: W 1 =W =1 W 2 =2 W 4 = E = {P 1 R 1, P 2 R, R 1 P 2, R 2 P 2, R 2 P 1, R P } 7 8 Resource Allocation Graph With A Deadlock Graph With A Cycle But No Deadlock Two cycles P 1 R 1 P 2 R P R 2 P 1 P 2 R P R 2 P 2 9 10 Basic Facts Methods for Handling Deadlocks If graph contains no cycles no deadlock If graph contains a cycle if only one instance per resource type, then deadlock if several instances per resource type, possibility of deadlock Question: Can you find a way to determine whether there is a deadlock, given a resource allocation graph with several instances per resource type? Ensure that the system will never enter a deadlock state Deadlock prevention Deadlock avoidance Allow the system to enter a deadlock state and then recover Deadlock detection Deadlock recovery 11 12 2

Deadlock Prevention Deadlock Prevention (Cont.) Restrain the ways request can be made Mutual Exclusion not required for sharable resources; must hold for non-sharable resources Hold and Wait must guarantee that whenever a process requests a resource, it does not hold any other resources Require process to request and be allocated all its resources before it begins execution Or allow process to request resources only when the process has none (has released all its resources) Low resource utilization; starvation possible No Preemption If a process that is holding some resources requests another resource that cannot be immediately allocated to it, then all resources currently being held are preempted Preempted resources are added to the list of resources for which the process is waiting Process will be restarted only when it can regain its old resources, as well as the new ones that it is requesting Circular Wait impose a total ordering of all resource types, and require that each process requests resources in an increasing order of enumeration 1 14 Deadlock Avoidance Safe State Requires that the system has some additional a priori information available Requires that each process declare the maximum number of resources of each type that it may need The deadlock-avoidance algorithm dynamically examines the resource-allocation state to ensure that there can never be a circular-wait condition Resource-allocation state is defined by the number of available and allocated resources, and the maximum demands of the processes When a process requests an available resource, system must decide if immediate allocation leaves the system in a safe state System is in safe state if there exists a safe sequence <P 1, P 2,, P n > of ALL the processes in the systems such that for each P i, the resources that P i can still request can be satisfied by currently available resources + resources held by all the P j, with j < i That is: If P i s resource needs are not immediately available, then P i can wait until all P j have finished When all P j are finished, P i can obtain needed resources, execute, return allocated resources, and terminate When P i terminates, P i +1 can obtain its needed resources, and so on Otherwise, system is in unsafe state 15 16 Safe, Unsafe, Deadlock State If a system is in safe state no deadlocks If a system is in unsafe state possibility of deadlock Avoidance ensure that a system will never enter an unsafe state. P 1 4 2 2 Safe sequence:? 17 18

P 1 4 4 0 1 5 Safe sequence: P 1 Safe sequence: P 1 19 20 P 0 10 10 0 0 P 0 10 -- -- 10 Safe sequence: P 1 P 0 Safe sequence: P 1 P 0 21 22 P 0 10 -- -- P 2 9 9 0 P 0 10 -- -- P 2 9 -- -- 12 Safe sequence: P 1 P 0 P 2 Safe sequence: P 1 P 0 P 2 2 24 4

P 1 4 2 2 P 2 9 6 2 P 2 9 6 4 Safe sequence:? Safe sequence: P 1? 25 26 Avoidance Algorithms Resource-Allocation-Graph Algorithm Avoidance algorithms ensure that the system will never deadlock. Whenever a process requests a resource, the request is granted only if the allocation leaves the system in a safe state. Two avoidance algorithms Single instance of a resource type Use a resource-allocation graph Multiple instances of a resource type Use the banker s algorithm Claim edge P i R j indicates that process P j may request resource R j ; represented by a directed dashed line Resources must be claimed a priori in the system Claim edge converts to request edge when a process requests a resource Request edge converted to an assignment edge when the resource is allocated to the process When a resource is released by a process, assignment edge reconverts to a claim edge (the edge is removed if the process finishes) 27 28 Resource-Allocation Graph Algorithm Banker s Algorithm Suppose that process P i requests a resource R j The request can be granted only if converting the request edge to an assignment edge does not result in the formation of a circle in the resource allocation graph Multiple instances Each process must a priori claim maximum use When a process requests a resource it may have to wait When a process gets all its resources it must return them in a finite amount of time Can we grant P 2 s request for R 2? Circle! Therefore, P 2 s request cannot be granted, and P 2 needs to wait. 29 0 5

Data Structures for the Banker s Algorithm Safety Algorithm Let n = number of processes, and m = number of resources types. : Vector of length m. If available[j] = k, there are k instances of resource type R j available Max: n x m matrix. If Max[i,j] = k, then process P i may request at most k instances of resource type R j Allocation: n x m matrix. If Allocation[i,j] = k then P i is currently allocated k instances of R j Need: n x m matrix. If Need[i,j] = k, then P i may need k more instances of R j to complete its task Need[i,j] = Max[i,j] Allocation[i,j] 1. Let Work and Finish be vectors of length m and n, respectively. Initialize: Work = Finish [i] = false, for i = 0, 1,, n- 1 2. Find an i such that both: (a) Finish [i] = false (b) Need i Work If no such i exists, go to step 4. Work = Work + Allocation i Finish[i] = true go to step 2 4. If Finish [i] == true for all i, then the system is in a safe state 1 2 Resource-Request Algorithm for Process P i Example of Banker s Algorithm Request i = request vector for process P i. If Request i [j] = k then process P i wants k instances of resource type R j 1. If Request i Need i, go to step 2. Otherwise, raise error condition, since process has exceeded its maximum claim 2. If Request i, go to step. Otherwise P i must wait, since resources are not available. Pretend to allocate requested resources to P i by modifying the state as follows: = Request i ; Allocation i = Allocation i + Request i ; Need i = Need i Request i ; If safe the resources are allocated to P i If unsafe P i must wait, and the old resource-allocation state is restored 5 processes P 0 through P 4 ; resource types: A (10 instances), B (5 instances), and C (7 instances) Snapshot at time T 0 : P 0 7 5 0 1 0 7 4 2 P 1 2 2 2 0 0 1 2 2 P 2 2 2 2 1 1 0 1 1 Is the system in safe state? 4 Applying Safety Algorithm Applying Safety Algorithm P 0 7 5 0 1 0 7 4 2 5 1 12 P 0 7 5 0 1 0 7 4 57 2 4 21 P 1 2 2 2 02 02 10 20 20 P 2 2 2 2 1 1 0 1 1 P 2 2 2 2 12 12 0 10 10 Safe sequence: P 1 Safe sequence: P 1 P 5 6 6

Applying Safety Algorithm Applying Safety Algorithm P 0 7 5 07 15 0 70 40 0 7 0 54 0 0 10 71 5 5 P 2 9 0 2 9 0 2 60 0 0 Safe sequence: P 1 P P 0 Safe sequence: P 1 P P 0 P 2 7 8 Applying Safety Algorithm Example: P 1 Request (1,0,2) Check that Request (that is, (1,0,2) (,,2) true) 10 6 2 545 7 P 4 4 04 0 2 40 0 10 Safe sequence: P 1 P P 0 P 2 P 4 P 0 7 5 0 1 0 7 4 2 02 P 1 2 2 2 0 20 01 2 02 P 2 2 2 2 1 1 0 1 1 Executing safety algorithm shows that sequence < P 1, P, P 0, P 2, P 4 > satisfies safety requirement 9 40 Example: P 0 Request (0,2,0) Pop Quiz Check that Request (that is, (0,2,0) (2,,0) true) P 0 7 5 0 1 0 7 42 2 1 0 P 1 2 2 0 2 0 2 0 P 2 2 2 2 1 1 0 1 1 Does there a safe sequence exist? No 5 processes P 0 through P 4 ; resource types: A (10 instances), B (5 instances), and C (7 instances) Snapshot at time T 0 : P 0 7 5 0 1 0 7 4 2 P 1 2 2 2 0 0 1 2 2 P 2 2 2 2 1 1 0 1 1 Can P4 s request (2, 1, 0) be granted? Can P4 s next request (2, 1, 1) be granted? 41 42 7

Deadlock Detection Allow system to enter deadlock state Detection algorithm Recovery scheme Single Instance of Each Resource Type Maintain wait-for graph Nodes are processes P i P j if P i is waiting for P j Periodically invoke an algorithm that searches for a cycle in the graph. If there is a cycle, there exists a deadlock Resource-Allocation Graph Corresponding wait-for graph 4 44 Several Instances of a Resource Type Detection Algorithm : A vector of length m indicates the number of available resources of each type. Allocation: An n x m matrix defines the number of resources of each type currently allocated to each process. Request: An n x m matrix indicates the current request of each process. If Request[i][j] = k, then process P i is requesting k more instances of resource type R j. 1. Let Work and Finish be vectors of length m and n, and initialize: (a) Work = (b) For i = 1,2,, n, if Allocation i 0, then Finish[i] = false; otherwise, Finish[i] = true 2. Find an index i such that both: (a) Finish[i] == false (b) Request i Work If no such i exists, go to step 4. Work = Work + Allocation i Finish[i] = true go to step 2 4. If Finish[i] == false, for some i, 1 i n, then the system is in deadlock state. Moreover, if Finish[i] == false, then P i is deadlocked 45 46 Example of Detection Algorithm Example (Cont.) Five processes P 0 through P 4 ; three resource types A (7 instances), B (2 instances), and C (6 instances) Snapshot at time T 0 : Allocation Request A B C A B C A B C P 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P 1 2 0 0 2 0 2 P 2 0 0 0 0 P 2 1 1 1 0 0 P 4 0 0 2 0 0 2 Sequence <P 0, P 2, P, P 1, P 4 > will result in Finish[i] = true for all i P 2 requests an additional instance of type C State of system? Allocation Request A B C A B C A B C P 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P 1 2 0 0 2 0 2 P 2 0 0 0 1 P 2 1 1 1 0 0 P 4 0 0 2 0 0 2 Can reclaim resources held by process P 0, but insufficient resources to fulfill other processes requests Deadlock exists, consisting of processes P 1, P 2, P, and P 4 47 48 8

Detection-Algorithm Usage Recovery from Deadlock When, and how often, to invoke depends on: How often a deadlock is likely to occur? How many processes will need to be rolled back? one for each disjoint cycle Process Termination abort one or more processes to break the circular wait Resource Preemption preempt some resources from one or more of the deadlocked processes 49 50 Process Termination Resource Preemption Abort all deadlocked processes Abort one process at a time until the deadlock cycle is eliminated In which order should we choose to abort? Priority of the process How long process has computed, and how much longer to completion Resources the process has used Resources process needs to complete How many processes will need to be terminated Is process interactive or batch? Selecting a victim minimize cost Rollback return to some safe state, restart process from that state Starvation same process may always be picked as victim, include number of rollback in cost factor 51 52 Homework Reading Chapter 7 Exercise See course website 5 9