ROTATIONAL DEPENDENCE OF THE SUPERCONVERGENT PATCH RECOVERY AND ITS REMEDY FOR 4-NODE ISOPARAMETRIC QUADRILATERAL ELEMENTS

Similar documents

Guidelines for proper use of Plate elements

ENGINEERING TRIPOS PART IIA FINITE ELEMENT METHOD

Visualization of errors of finite element solutions P. Beckers, H.G. Zhong, Ph. Andry Aerospace Department, University of Liege, B-4000 Liege, Belgium

A STUDY ON ENERGY NORM AS AN ALTERNATE APPROACH TO MESH CONVERGENCE ON CIRCUMFERENTIAL DISK DOVETAIL OF AIRCRAFT ENGINE COMPRESSOR

Analysis of Distortion Parameters of Eight node Serendipity Element on the Elements Performance

TICAM - Texas Institute for Computational and Applied Mathematics. The University of Texas at Austin. Taylor Hall Abstract

Finite Element Method. Chapter 7. Practical considerations in FEM modeling

Similar Pulley Wheel Description J.E. Akin, Rice University

3D Finite Element Software for Cracks. Version 3.2. Benchmarks and Validation

LIGO Scissors Table Static Test and Analysis Results

Chapter 3 Analysis of Original Steel Post

Buckling Analysis of a Thin Plate

EDGE-BASED SMOOTHED POINT INTERPOLATION METHODS

PATCH TEST OF HEXAHEDRAL ELEMENT

NEW WAVE OF CAD SYSTEMS AND ITS APPLICATION IN DESIGN

CE Advanced Structural Analysis. Lab 4 SAP2000 Plane Elasticity

ISSN: ISO 9001:2008 Certified International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology (IJEIT) Volume 2, Issue 3, September 2012

APPLICATIONS OF DRILLING DEGREES OF FREEDOM FOR 2D AND 3D STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

3D Nearest-Nodes Finite Element Method for Solid Continuum Analysis

Module 1.3W Distributed Loading of a 1D Cantilever Beam

ANSYS AIM Tutorial Structural Analysis of a Plate with Hole

Investigation of the behaviour of single span reinforced concrete historic bridges by using the finite element method

ANSYS Workbench Guide

The Essence of Result Post- Processing

CHAPTER 4. Numerical Models. descriptions of the boundary conditions, element types, validation, and the force

A SIMPLE PATH-INDEPENDENT INTEGRAL FOR CALCULATING MIXED-MODE STRESS INTENSITY FACTORS

Elfini Solver Verification

Revision of the SolidWorks Variable Pressure Simulation Tutorial J.E. Akin, Rice University, Mechanical Engineering. Introduction

J. TINSLEY ODEN, and C. ARMANDO DUARTE y. Texas Inst. for Comput. and Appl. Math. The University of Texas at Austin. Taylor Hall 2.

Linear Bifurcation Buckling Analysis of Thin Plate

Revised Sheet Metal Simulation, J.E. Akin, Rice University

Post-Buckling Analysis of a Thin Plate

Application of Finite Volume Method for Structural Analysis

CITY AND GUILDS 9210 UNIT 135 MECHANICS OF SOLIDS Level 6 TUTORIAL 15 - FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS - PART 1

Solid and shell elements

Chapter 7 Practical Considerations in Modeling. Chapter 7 Practical Considerations in Modeling

Engineering Effects of Boundary Conditions (Fixtures and Temperatures) J.E. Akin, Rice University, Mechanical Engineering

SETTLEMENT OF A CIRCULAR FOOTING ON SAND

Recent Advances on Higher Order 27-node Hexahedral Element in LS-DYNA

An Introductory SIGMA/W Example

Tutorial 1: Welded Frame - Problem Description

Smooth finite elements

Bell Crank. Problem: Joseph Shigley and Charles Mischke. Mechanical Engineering Design 5th ed (New York: McGraw Hill, May 2002) page 87.

Module 1.5: Moment Loading of a 2D Cantilever Beam

Plane strain conditions, 20 mm thick. b a. Material properties: E aa= N/mm2 Interface properties: G IC=0.28 N/mm E =E 00 N/mm2.

A pipe bend is subjected to a concentrated force as shown: y All dimensions in inches. Material is stainless steel.

RELIABILITY OF THE FEM CALCULATIONS OF THE FRACTURE MECHANICS PARAMETERS

Generative Part Structural Analysis Fundamentals

Finite Element Course ANSYS Mechanical Tutorial Tutorial 4 Plate With a Hole

Finite Element Analysis Prof. Dr. B. N. Rao Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras. Lecture - 36

Simulation of rotation and scaling algorithm for numerically modelled structures

Stiffened Plate With Pressure Loading

CHAPTER 4 INCREASING SPUR GEAR TOOTH STRENGTH BY PROFILE MODIFICATION

Latch Spring. Problem:

Static and Dynamic Analysis Of Reed Valves Using a Minicomputer Based Finite Element Systems

Deep Beam With Web Opening

A spectral boundary element method

Fatigue Crack Growth Simulation using S-version FEM

Stress analysis of toroidal shell

A meshfree weak-strong form method

Exercise 1. 3-Point Bending Using the GUI and the Bottom-up-Method

Finite Element Course ANSYS Mechanical Tutorial Tutorial 3 Cantilever Beam

FOUNDATION IN OVERCONSOLIDATED CLAY

Using three-dimensional CURVIC contact models to predict stress concentration effects in an axisymmetric model

An optimization method for generating self-equilibrium shape of curved surface from developable surface

An Explanation on Computation of Fracture Mechanics Parameters in ANSYS

Beams. Lesson Objectives:

Tekla Structures Analysis Guide. Product version 21.0 March Tekla Corporation

Stress Analysis of thick wall bellows using Finite Element Method

Transient Response of a Rocket

Stress due to surface load

PARAMETRIC EQUATIONS AND POLAR COORDINATES

SHAPE SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS INCLUDING QUALITY CONTROL WITH CARTESIAN FINITE ELEMENT MESHES

Effective adaptation of hexahedral mesh using local refinement and error estimation

Linear Buckling Analysis of a Plate

Aufgabe 1: Dreipunktbiegung mit ANSYS Workbench

Shell-to-Solid Element Connector(RSSCON)

Multi-Step Analysis of a Cantilever Beam

Module 1.7W: Point Loading of a 3D Cantilever Beam

Reinforced concrete beam under static load: simulation of an experimental test

Extraction of Strut and Tie Model From 3D Solid Element Mesh Analysis

Computational Simulation of Cylindrical Pressure Loading

Design and Analysis of Control Bay Used in Guided Missile

FINITE ELEMENT SIMULATION OF ELASTIC AND QUASI STATIC CRACK PROPAGATION UNDER MIXED MODE LOADING CONDITIONS

Example 24 Spring-back

Computer Life (CPL) ISSN: Finite Element Analysis of Bearing Box on SolidWorks

Elastic Analysis of a Deep Beam with Web Opening

Abaqus CAE Tutorial 1: 2D Plane Truss

MODELING MIXED BOUNDARY PROBLEMS WITH THE COMPLEX VARIABLE BOUNDARY ELEMENT METHOD (CVBEM) USING MATLAB AND MATHEMATICA

Stress Concentration Factors

Linear Static Analysis of a Simply-Supported Stiffened Plate

OpenGL Graphics System. 2D Graphics Primitives. Drawing 2D Graphics Primitives. 2D Graphics Primitives. Mathematical 2D Primitives.

SSR Polygonal Search Area

COMPUTER AIDED ENGINEERING. Part-1

Module 1.7: Point Loading of a 3D Cantilever Beam

PREDICTION OF CRACK PROPAGATION DIRECTION FOR HOLES UNDER QUASI-STATIC LOADING

Study of Convergence of Results in Finite Element Analysis of a Plane Stress Bracket

Module 1.6: Distributed Loading of a 2D Cantilever Beam

GBTUL 1.0. Buckling and Vibration Analysis of Thin-Walled Members USER MANUAL. Rui Bebiano Nuno Silvestre Dinar Camotim

Transcription:

COMMUNICATIONS IN NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING Commun. Numer. Meth. Engng, 15, 493±499 (1999) ROTATIONAL DEPENDENCE OF THE SUPERCONVERGENT PATCH RECOVERY AND ITS REMEDY FOR 4-NODE ISOPARAMETRIC QUADRILATERAL ELEMENTS HYUNG-SEOK OH AND R. C. BATRA* Department of Engineering Science and Mechanics, MC-0219, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA SUMMARY The superconvergent patch recovery (SPR) with bilinear interpolation functions usually gives good values of recovered stresses in an element patch. However, when 4-node quadrilateral elements meeting at a node are rigidly rotated with the essential and natural boundary conditions unchanged, the recovered stresses obtained by the SPR change and depend upon the local rotation of the patch. This can be remedied either by including higher-order terms in the polynomials for the assumed stress distribution in an element patch, or by using linear interpolation functions, which gives inferior accuracy of the recovered stresses near the boundaries of the domain. Additional sampling points are suggested to compute the higher-order terms. Copyright # 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. KEY WORDS Zienkiewicz-Zhu's error; quadrilateral elements; nodal stresses; plane elastic problems 1 INTRODUCTION The superconvergent patch recovery 1±3 (SPR) technique, proposed by Zienkiewicz and Zhu, improves the accuracy of nodal stresses in linear and higher-order nite elements. These recovered stresses when used in Zienkiewicz±Zhu's error estimate 2,4,5 also improve the accuracy of the error estimate. 2 In the SPR, an element patch consists of all elements sharing a node. A polynomial is assumed to represent the distribution of a stress component in the element patch, and the unknown parameters in the polynomial are calculated by the least-squares t to the values of the stress component at sampling points in the patch. Thus, the accuracy of recovered stresses usually depends on the degree of the assumed polynomial. For example, for a `regular mesh' discretized with bilinear isoparametric quadrilateral elements, an element patch usually consists of four elements, the assumed polynomial is a bilinear form and each element has one sampling point coincident with the optimal stress point. However, as the local mesh is rotated without changing the boundary conditions and the applied loading, global stresses obtained by the SPR change signi cantly and their calculation becomes impossible for an angle of rotation of 45 degrees. This is because the number of terms in the assumed polynomial for nodal stresses is not enough to fully represent the local rotation of the mesh. This occurs both in a regular and an irregular mesh. * Correspondence to: R. C. Batra, Department of Engineering Science and Mechanics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University, Mail Code 0219, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA. CCC 1069±8299/99/070493±07$17.50 Received 6 August 1998 Copyright # 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Accepted 17 November 1998

494 H.-S. OH AND R. C. BATRA This phenomenon can be avoided either by approximating the stress distribution in an element patch with a polynomial of order high enough to represent the rotation, or low enough to exclude the rotation. Additional sampling points are suggested to determine unknown parameters associated with the higher-order polynomial. 2 THE SPR INDEPENDENT OF MESH ROTATION Figure 1 shows a typical element patch and the associated sampling points in a regular mesh discretized with bilinear quadrilateral elements. Each component s* p of the stress eld in the patch is expressed as where For simplicity, we write (1) as s* p ˆ Pa 1 P ˆ 1 x y xyš; a ˆ a 1 a 2 a 3 a 4 Š T 2 s* p ˆ f 1; x; y; xy 3 Then, as the nite element mesh is locally rotated through an angle y without any change of the loading and boundary conditions, the stress component in the rotated co-ordinates becomes s* p ˆ ~f 1; x 0 ; y 0 ; x 0 y 0 ; x 02 ; y 02 4 because x 0 ˆ x cos y y sin y and y 0 ˆ x sin y y cos y. If one uses the locally rotated mesh and computes recovered stresses by using (1), then these would di er signi cantly from those Figure 1. Element patch and sampling points

SUPERCONVERGENT PATCH RECOVERY 495 obtained by using a regular mesh because of the absence of terms involving x 2 and y 2. In general, then, the polynomial P in (1) should be a complete polynomial of degree 2; namely, P ˆ 1 x y xy x 2 y 2 Š 5 Better accuracy of recovered stresses is expected in an arbitrary mesh because of added higherorder terms. However, the polynomial (5) has six terms. Thus six unknowns are to be determined, and we need at least two additional sampling points. However, four additional sampling points, shown in Figure 1, are employed for symmetry in this paper. Each additional sampling point is located on the common side between two adjoining elements where the line joining two interior sampling points intersects it. Stress values at these additional sampling points can be easily obtained by applying the SPR in one dimension. For example, in order to obtain stress values at the additional sampling point A in Figure 1, the SPR technique is applied to points B and C; it is equivalent to interpolating stresses at A from those at B and C. Alternatively, one could omit the term xy in the polynomial P; however, the recovered stresses lose some accuracy near the boundaries of the body. 3. NUMERICAL EXAMPLES We illustrate for two example problems the e ect of employing the conventional and additional sampling points in the SPR, and the lower-order polynomial in P. In each case, Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio are set to 10 and 0.3, respectively. Figure 2 shows a nite element mesh for a cantilever beam with height/length equal to 0.2. In Figure 3, we have plotted contours of the Figure 2. Cantilever beam subjected to uniform pressure at the end face Figure 3. Contours of the bending stress obtained by the SPR technique with linear and bilinear interpolation functions

496 H.-S. OH AND R. C. BATRA Figure 4. Contours of the bending stress obtained by the SPR with only the conventional sampling points as the mesh is locally rotated bending stress recovered by using the linear and the bilinear interpolation functions in the SPR technique. Even though there is no rotational dependence exhibited by the SPR technique with a linear interpolation function, the accuracy of the recovered stresses near the two edges of the beam is less than that obtained with the bilinear interpolation function. Figure 4 depicts contours of the bending stress obtained by the SPR with only the conventional sampling points for di erent angles of rotation of the mesh. For the regular mesh of Figure 2, as expected, the magnitude of the bending stress is symmetrical about the horizontal centroidal axis, but this symmetry disappears when the mesh is rotated through 15, 30 and 44.9 degrees. However, when additional sampling points are also considered the contours of the bending stress are independent of the rotation of the mesh. Figure 5 shows the bending stresses at the point P obtained by the SPR with conventional sampling points only and with conventional and additional sampling points; these are normalized by the bending stress at point P for no rotation of the mesh. It is clear that the bending stress obtained with the conventional sampling points strongly depends on

SUPERCONVERGENT PATCH RECOVERY 497 Figure 5. Bending stress at point P vs. the angle of rotation of the mesh the rotation of the mesh. The slope of the curve rapidly increases when the angle of rotation is close to 458, and we cannot calculate the bending stress for an angle of rotation of 458 because then the matrix P T P is singular. However, the stresses obtained with the conventional and additional sampling points do not depend on the angle of rotation of the mesh. Figure 6 exhibits a nite element model of a circular plate with a circular hole at its centre and subjected to a uniform pressure on the inner surface of the hole. For this problem, the solution should be independent of the angular position of a point. The distribution of the maximum principal stress recovered by the SPR technique with linear and bilinear interpolation functions is plotted in Figure 7. As for the beam problem (cf. Figure 3), the SPR technique with the bilinear interpolation functions gives more accurate values of the principal stresses near the boundaries. Figure 8 evinces, for di erent angles of rotation of the mesh, the distribution of the maximum principal stress obtained by the SPR technique with conventional and additional sampling points. The stress obtained with the conventional sampling points shows non-uniform Figure 6. Finite element model and boundary condition for an annular circular plate

498 H.-S. OH AND R. C. BATRA Figure 7. Contours of the maximum principal stress in the circular plate obtained by the SPR technique with linear and bilinear interpolation functions Figure 8. Contours of the maximum principal stress in the circular plate obtained by the SPR with conventional, and with conventional and additional sampling points distribution along the circumference of the outer boundary, but that obtained by using the conventional and additional sampling points in the SPR is uniformly distributed in the circumferential direction. Figure 9 shows the distribution of the Zienkiewicz±Zhu error energy norm. 2,4,5 When using only the conventional sampling points in the SPR, the error distribution is unreasonable, since the error in the shaded element near the middle of the free boundary is larger than that in the shaded element near the hole. The inaccuracy of the recovered stress shown in Figure 8 yields this incorrect estimate of Zienkiewicz±Zhu's error. However, by using the conventional and additional sampling points, the computed Zienkiewicz±Zhu errors vary only in the radial direction as expected.

SUPERCONVERGENT PATCH RECOVERY 499 Figure 9. Distribution of Zienkiewicz±Zhu's error energy norm in the circular plate 4 CONCLUDING REMARKS We have shown for two commonly encountered example problems that the SPR technique employing bilinear interpolation functions with conventional sampling points for bilinear quadrilateral elements gives an incorrect distribution of stresses as the mesh is locally rotated. However, when either a linear polynomial for recovered stresses or a higher-order polynomial expression for the recovered stresses and additional sampling points suggested herein are used, the recovered stresses are independent of the orientation of the mesh with respect to the global axes. The proposed modi ed SPR technique can be easily extended to the 8-noded brick element. REFERENCES 1. O. C. Zienkiewicz and J. Z. Zhu, `The superconvergent patch recovery and a posteriori error estimates. Part 1: the recovery technique', Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 33, 1331±1364 (1992). 2. O. C. Zienkiewicz and J. Z. Zhu, `The superconvergent patch recovery and a posteriori error estimates. Part 2: error estimates and adaptivity', Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 33, 1365±1382 (1992). 3. O. C. Zienkiewicz, J. Z. Zhu and J. Wu, `Superconvergent patch recovery technique Ð some further tests', Commun. Numer. Methods Eng., 9, 251±258 (1993). 4. O. C. Zienkiewicz and R. L. Taylor, The Finite Element Method, Vol. 1, 4 Edn, McGraw-Hill, 1989. 5. H. S. Oh and J. K. Lim, `Modi ed h-method with directional error estimate for nite element stress analysis', Comput. Struct., 65(2), 191±204 (1997).