Standards Driven Innovation

Similar documents
Semantic Technologies and CDISC Standards. Frederik Malfait, Information Architect, IMOS Consulting Scott Bahlavooni, Independent

CDISC Standards End-to-End: Enabling QbD in Data Management Sam Hume

Improving Metadata Compliance and Assessing Quality Metrics with a Standards Library

CDISC Standards and the Semantic Web

CDASH MODEL 1.0 AND CDASHIG 2.0. Kathleen Mellars Special Thanks to the CDASH Model and CDASHIG Teams

Why organizations need MDR system to manage clinical metadata?

CDASH Standards and EDC CRF Library. Guang-liang Wang September 18, Q3 DCDISC Meeting

Semantic Technology and CDISC Standards

Out-of-the-box %definexml

Now let s take a look

Paper DS07 PhUSE 2017 CDISC Transport Standards - A Glance. Giri Balasubramanian, PRA Health Sciences Edwin Ponraj Thangarajan, PRA Health Sciences

Sandra Minjoe, Accenture Life Sciences John Brega, PharmaStat. PharmaSUG Single Day Event San Francisco Bay Area

PharmaSUG 2014 PO16. Category CDASH SDTM ADaM. Submission in standardized tabular form. Structure Flexible Rigid Flexible * No Yes Yes

BUSINESS-BASED VALUE IN AN MDR

CDISC Public Webinar Standards Updates and Additions. 26 Feb 2015

Taming Rave: How to control data collection standards?

Hanming Tu, Accenture, Berwyn, USA

Lex Jansen Octagon Research Solutions, Inc.

How a Metadata Repository enables dynamism and automation in SDTM-like dataset generation

SAS offers technology to facilitate working with CDISC standards : the metadata perspective.

Standards Metadata Management (System)

Legacy to SDTM Conversion Workshop: Tools and Techniques

Best Practices for E2E DB build process and Efficiency on CDASH to SDTM data Tao Yang, FMD K&L, Nanjing, China

Dataset-XML - A New CDISC Standard

Advantages of a real end-to-end approach with CDISC standards

ODM The Operational Efficiency Model: Using ODM to Deliver Proven Cost and Time Savings in Study Set-up

An Alternate Way to Create the Standard SDTM Domains

Study Composer: a CRF design tool enabling the re-use of CDISC define.xml metadata

Introduction to Define.xml

Implementing CDISC Using SAS. Full book available for purchase here.

Edwin Ponraj Thangarajan, PRA Health Sciences, Chennai, India Giri Balasubramanian, PRA Health Sciences, Chennai, India

Managing CDISC version changes: how & when to implement? Presented by Lauren Shinaberry, Project Manager Business & Decision Life Sciences

R1 Test Case that tests this Requirement Comments Manage Users User Role Management

Data Science Services Dirk Engfer Page 1 of 5

From ODM to SDTM: An End-to-End Approach Applied to Phase I Clinical Trials

Automated Creation of Submission-Ready Artifacts Silas McKee, Accenture, Pennsylvania, USA Lourdes Devenney, Accenture, Pennsylvania, USA

EDC Training: Rave Architect Lite. Participant Guide 2.0 [30 Mar 11]

From SDTM to displays, through ADaM & Analyses Results Metadata, a flight on board METADATA Airlines

PhUSE Paper SD09. "Overnight" Conversion to SDTM Datasets Ready for SDTM Submission Niels Mathiesen, mathiesen & mathiesen, Basel, Switzerland

Creating Define-XML v2 with the SAS Clinical Standards Toolkit 1.6 Lex Jansen, SAS

Clinical Metadata Metadata management with a CDISC mindset

PharmaSUG. companies. This paper. will cover how. processes, a fairly linear. before moving. be carried out. Lifecycle. established.

The Wonderful World of Define.xml.. Practical Uses Today. Mark Wheeldon, CEO, Formedix DC User Group, Washington, 9 th December 2008

Traceability Look for the source of your analysis results

CDISC SDTM and ADaM Real World Issues

Beyond OpenCDISC: Using Define.xml Metadata to Ensure End-to-End Submission Integrity. John Brega Linda Collins PharmaStat LLC

Paper FC02. SDTM, Plus or Minus. Barry R. Cohen, Octagon Research Solutions, Wayne, PA

PhUSE Protocol Representation: The Forgotten CDISC Model

From raw data to submission: A metadata-driven, repository-based process of data conversion to CDISC models

How to review a CRF - A statistical programmer perspective

Submission-Ready Define.xml Files Using SAS Clinical Data Integration Melissa R. Martinez, SAS Institute, Cary, NC USA

Taming Rave: How to control data collection standards?

Lex Jansen Octagon Research Solutions, Inc.

From Implementing CDISC Using SAS. Full book available for purchase here. About This Book... xi About The Authors... xvii Acknowledgments...

An Efficient Solution to Efficacy ADaM Design and Implementation

SCDM 2017 ANNUAL CONFERENCE. September I Orlando

How to handle different versions of SDTM & DEFINE generation in a Single Study?

Helping The Define.xml User

Standards Implementation: It Should be Simple Right? Thursday January 18, 2018

Pharmaceuticals, Health Care, and Life Sciences. An Approach to CDISC SDTM Implementation for Clinical Trials Data

Taming the SHREW. SDTM Heuristic Research and Evaluation Workshop

Leveraging Study Data Reviewer s Guide (SDRG) in Building FDA s Confidence in Sponsor s Submitted Datasets

How to write ADaM specifications like a ninja.

Application of SDTM Trial Design at GSK. 9 th of December 2010

PhUSE EU Connect Paper PP15. Stop Copying CDISC Standards. Craig Parry, SyneQuaNon, Diss, England

Optimizing the Use of Data Standards CSS Summary

Improving CDISC SDTM Data Quality & Compliance Right from the Beginning

Cost-Benefit Analysis of Retrospective vs. Prospective Data Standardization

The development of standards management using EntimICE-AZ

Data Governance for the Connected Enterprise

Material covered in the Dec 2014 FDA Binding Guidances

Automate Analysis Results Metadata in the Define-XML v2.0. Hong Qi, Majdoub Haloui, Larry Wu, Gregory T Golm Merck & Co., Inc.

edify Requirements for Evidence-based Templates in Electronic Case Report Forms Marco Schweitzer, Stefan Oberbichler

Creating Define-XML version 2 including Analysis Results Metadata with the SAS Clinical Standards Toolkit

Study Data Reviewer s Guide. FDA/PhUSE Project Summary

Customizing SAS Data Integration Studio to Generate CDISC Compliant SDTM 3.1 Domains

Bay Area CDISC Network: PhUSE Working Group for Inspection Site Selection Data Standards

Doctor's Prescription to Re-engineer Process of Pinnacle 21 Community Version Friendly ADaM Development

SAS Clinical Data Integration 2.4

esource Initiative ISSUES RELATED TO NON-CRF DATA PRACTICES

EDC integrations. Rob Jongen Integration Technology & Data Standards

SAS Clinical Data Integration 2.6

Managing your metadata efficiently - a structured way to organise and frontload your analysis and submission data

When Communities of Interest Collide: Harmonizing Vocabularies Across Operational Areas C. L. Connors, The MITRE Corporation

Dictionary Driven Exchange Content Assembly Blueprints

CDISC Migra+on. PhUSE 2010 Berlin. 47 of the top 50 biopharmaceu+cal firms use Cytel sofware to design, simulate and analyze their clinical studies.

Rave Architect Lite. Instructor: [Name] About this Course. Audience. Prerequisites. Agenda. Purpose of the Course

CDISC Variable Mapping and Control Terminology Implementation Made Easy

Codelists Here, Versions There, Controlled Terminology Everywhere Shelley Dunn, Regulus Therapeutics, San Diego, California

What is high quality study metadata?

Dealing with changing versions of SDTM and Controlled Terminology (CT)

Implementing the Army Net Centric Data Strategy in a Service Oriented Environment

Aquila's Lunch And Learn CDISC The FDA Data Standard. Disclosure Note 1/17/2014. Host: Josh Boutwell, MBA, RAC CEO Aquila Solutions, LLC

PhUSE US Connect 2019

Clinical Metadata A complete metadata and project management solu6on. October 2017 Andrew Ndikom and Liang Wang

From Data to Knowledge: Semantics and Implementations

Automation of SDTM Programming in Oncology Disease Response Domain Yiwen Wang, Yu Cheng, Ju Chen Eli Lilly and Company, China

The Submission Data File System Automating the Creation of CDISC SDTM and ADaM Datasets

Study Data Reviewer s Guide Completion Guideline

A Successful Meta- Data Repository (MDR) - It s About Managing Relationships. Phil Giangiulio & Melanie Paules June, 2018

Transcription:

Standards Driven Innovation PhUSE Annual Conference 2014 Frederik Malfait IMOS Consulting GmbH, Hoffmann-La Roche AG

Managing Standards 2

Data Standards Value Proposition Standards are increasingly mandated You have to do it anyway You can as well make the best of it Define once, use many times When submitting data and analysis results, standards can ensure Compliance Consistency Correctness Have a repeatable process, do things faster Make data semantically meaningful Precisely define models and content Store semantics with the data, so it can be remembered Supports understanding and transparency of the data Semantically align and integrate data from differen^t sources Standards based automation Store data standards in a Metadata Registry Workflow automation 3

Pieces of the Puzzle Content Management Standards Management Standards Governance Information Architecture Standards MDR Standards Automation 4

Models and Standards M3: Meta-Meta-Model M2: Meta-Model M1: Model M0: Model Runtime RDF ISO 11179 CDISC Data 5

ISO 11179 Standard for Metadata Registry (MDR) 6

RDF Meta-Model Schema 7

RDF CDISC Schema 8

Model Instantiation: SDTM 9

Example - SDTM 10

Example - SDTM 11

Example - SDTM 12

Example - SDTM 13

Roche Implementation Integrated data standards Roche and Genentech 2010 MDR with operational metadata Enterprise level application, fully validated system First production release 2011 MDR components Browser, web services, search, item level versioning MDR concepts Prepared first half of 2013 To be integrated in standards development over the next few weeks Model driven capabilities (2014-2015): use RDF to specify Model driven read/write web servies + XSLT engine Model driven search Model driven validation rules Model driven UI Model driven security MDR used by other parties in Roche Master data management Configuration of integrated document managment systems 14

PhUSE CSS Semantic Technology WG Existing CDISC Standards in RDF CDASH SDTM SEND ADaM Controlled Terminology Protocol and Schedule of Activities in RDF Analysis Results Metadata in RDF Link to EHR Co-lead from CDISC Regulatory Guidance in RDF Co-lead from FDA 15

MDR Driven Study Workflow Automation (SWA) 16

Clinical Data Future State Standards & Metadata Repository: Integrated Workflow Clinical Development Plan Study Design Protocol External Knowledge Sources Data Analysis Plan Standards & Metadata Repository Data Collection Design Data Collection Data Tabulation Submission Clinical Study Report Data Analysis 17

Building out the vision, step by step Standards can help drive automation of key clinical processes Clinical Development Plan Study Design Protocol Data Analysis Plan Roadmap Information Standards Extension Study Workflow Automation Standards & Metadata Repository Data Collection Design Data Collection MDR SoA EDC Build Experiments Data Tabulation SDTMv Submission Clinical Study Report Data Analysis Key Benefit Automate existing information flow 18

SWA Experiments Status Experiment Set A: Creating a machine-readable SOA Experiment Description Status Exp. 1 Create a schema for a machine-readable SOA. Complete. Exp. 2 Upload a SOA into the GDSR. Complete. Includes representation of SOA in Word and HTML. Experiment Set B: Leveraging Global Data Standards Exp. 3 Exp. 4 Exp. 5 Use the GDSR to generate an operational annotated ecrf of the Global Data Standards. Use the GDSR to generate submission-ready annotated ecrfs of the Global Data Standards. Use the GDSR to generate ALS templates including edit checks of the Global Data Collection Standards. Complete. Complete. Complete (excluding edit checks). Exp. 6 Develop a tool that will produce a mapping specification and corresponding programming environment-independent SAS program that transforms collected data to SDTMv. Ongoing. - Code list alignment opportunity identified. - Reuse of data element mappings across forms - Potential to generate SDTMv annotations from mappings. - Platform-independent 19

SWA Experiments Status Experiment Set C: Expedite the Study Build Experiment Description Status Exp. 7 Exp. 8 Exp. 9 Exp. 10 Exp. 11 Design an interface that will enable the definition ecrfs from Global Data Standards or definition of new ecrfs. Design an interface that will enable the definition a non-crf File Format Specification. Design an interface that will enable the definition of a Visit Form Matrix. Use the GDSR to generate a study-specific ALS template from study-level metadata. Use the GDSR to generate a non-crf File Format Specification from study-level metadata. First SME workshop completed. Process analysis ongoing. First SME workshop completed. Process analysis ongoing. First SME workshop completed. Process analysis ongoing. First SME workshop completed. Process analysis ongoing. First SME workshop completed. Process analysis ongoing. 20

Schedule of Activities - SDM XML 21

Schedule of Activities Web Service Schedule of Activities 22

Operational CRF and Submission CRF Data Collection Web Service 23

Rave Architect Loader Spreadsheet Data Collection Web Service 24

Edit Checks Data Collection 25

SDTM Transformations Data Collection SDTM Mappings Data Tabulation Web Service Source Data Target Data Mappings 26

SDTM Transformations Reuse of existing data standards Rave source data elements SDTM target data elements Generate easy to understand SAS code Maximize platform independent code Support multiple target platforms Possible extensions Generate mapping specifications Generate conformance checks 27

Schedule of Activities 28

Arms and Epochs 29

Planned Activites 30

Time Points and Timing 31

SoA Instance 32

SoA Instance 33

Findings Full protocol too large to attack at once Schedule of Activities key for downstream automation Move data collection standards from forms to modules, research concepts, and data elements Hard, but necessary for first release Handle protocol amendments Integrate with data standard request process for new items Enterprise integration (App, MDR, EDC, data platform, CTMS etc,) Business value Less on the protocol side Massive on automated EDC build Massive on automated SDTM transformations Later stages Link SoA to cost information Integrate endpoints and data analysis standards Component based authoring 34

Protocol and SoA Concepts TransCelerate Common Protocol Template Human readable protocol Endpoints Technology sub-team CDISC Protocol Concept List Excel list, need to accellerate progress Started with concept comparisons in different settings PhUSE Prepared first half of 2013 Integrated in standards development, second half of 2014 All these activities complement each other Concept Management is a key component to be successfull End to end standards Create CDISC standards for TA endpoints and activities Link activities to data collection collection standards and metadata Link endpoints to data analysis standards and metadata 35

Questions? 36