Verification and Validation of Turbulent Flow around a Clark-Y Airfoil

Similar documents
Simulation of Turbulent Flow in an Asymmetric Diffuser

Verification and Validation of Turbulent Flow around a Clark-Y Airfoil

Verification of Laminar and Validation of Turbulent Pipe Flows

Simulation of Turbulent Flow over the Ahmed Body

Simulation of Turbulent Flow around an Airfoil

Simulation of Turbulent Flow around an Airfoil

Simulation of Laminar Pipe Flows

Simulation and Validation of Turbulent Pipe Flows

Simulation of Turbulent Flow over the Ahmed Body

Introduction to ANSYS CFX

Introduction to CFX. Workshop 2. Transonic Flow Over a NACA 0012 Airfoil. WS2-1. ANSYS, Inc. Proprietary 2009 ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.

Simulation of Flow Development in a Pipe

A B C D E. Settings Choose height, H, free stream velocity, U, and fluid (dynamic viscosity and density ) so that: Reynolds number

Strömningslära Fluid Dynamics. Computer laboratories using COMSOL v4.4

Analysis of an airfoil

Compressible Flow in a Nozzle

Appendix: To be performed during the lab session

Express Introductory Training in ANSYS Fluent Workshop 04 Fluid Flow Around the NACA0012 Airfoil

NUMERICAL 3D TRANSONIC FLOW SIMULATION OVER A WING

Module D: Laminar Flow over a Flat Plate

Modeling External Compressible Flow

TUTORIAL#3. Marek Jaszczur. Boundary Layer on a Flat Plate W1-1 AGH 2018/2019

TUTORIAL#4. Marek Jaszczur. Turbulent Thermal Boundary Layer on a Flat Plate W1-1 AGH 2018/2019

Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) for Built Environment

ANSYS FLUENT. Airfoil Analysis and Tutorial

Application of Wray-Agarwal Turbulence Model for Accurate Numerical Simulation of Flow Past a Three-Dimensional Wing-body

Debojyoti Ghosh. Adviser: Dr. James Baeder Alfred Gessow Rotorcraft Center Department of Aerospace Engineering

Computational Study of Laminar Flowfield around a Square Cylinder using Ansys Fluent

Lab 8: FLUENT: Turbulent Boundary Layer Flow with Convection

Adjoint Solver Workshop

and to the following students who assisted in the creation of the Fluid Dynamics tutorials:

Introduction to C omputational F luid Dynamics. D. Murrin

Flow in an Intake Manifold

Lab 9: FLUENT: Transient Natural Convection Between Concentric Cylinders

Supersonic Flow Over a Wedge

How to Enter and Analyze a Wing

Backward facing step Homework. Department of Fluid Mechanics. For Personal Use. Budapest University of Technology and Economics. Budapest, 2010 autumn

Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics Mech 122 D. Fabris, K. Lynch, D. Rich

Team 194: Aerodynamic Study of Airflow around an Airfoil in the EGI Cloud

Grid. Apr 09, 1998 FLUENT 5.0 (2d, segregated, lam) Grid. Jul 31, 1998 FLUENT 5.0 (2d, segregated, lam)

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS ANALYSIS OF ORIFICE PLATE METERING SITUATIONS UNDER ABNORMAL CONFIGURATIONS

Tutorial 1. Introduction to Using FLUENT: Fluid Flow and Heat Transfer in a Mixing Elbow

SimCafe. ANSYS WB - Airfoil - Setup (Physics) Added by Benjamin J Mullen, last edited by Benjamin J Mullen on Apr 29, :18

Computation of Velocity, Pressure and Temperature Distributions near a Stagnation Point in Planar Laminar Viscous Incompressible Flow

FLUENT Secondary flow in a teacup Author: John M. Cimbala, Penn State University Latest revision: 26 January 2016

Isotropic Porous Media Tutorial

Non-Newtonian Transitional Flow in an Eccentric Annulus

ANSYS AIM Tutorial Turbulent Flow Over a Backward Facing Step

CFD Analysis of 2-D Unsteady Flow Past a Square Cylinder at an Angle of Incidence

Usage of CFX for Aeronautical Simulations

Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Simulation in Air Duct Channels Using STAR CCM+

and to the following students who assisted in the creation of the Fluid Dynamics tutorials:

Using a Single Rotating Reference Frame

Modeling Flow Through Porous Media

The viscous forces on the cylinder are proportional to the gradient of the velocity field at the

High-Lift Aerodynamics: STAR-CCM+ Applied to AIAA HiLiftWS1 D. Snyder

CFD Best Practice Guidelines: A process to understand CFD results and establish Simulation versus Reality

Rotating Moving Boundary Analysis Using ANSYS 5.7

OpenFOAM GUIDE FOR BEGINNERS

DRAFT. Lab 8: FLUENT: Turbulent Boundary Layer Flow with Convection. Objective:

Studies of the Continuous and Discrete Adjoint Approaches to Viscous Automatic Aerodynamic Shape Optimization

Turbulencja w mikrokanale i jej wpływ na proces emulsyfikacji

SPC 307 Aerodynamics. Lecture 1. February 10, 2018

Transition Flow and Aeroacoustic Analysis of NACA0018 Satish Kumar B, Fred Mendonç a, Ghuiyeon Kim, Hogeon Kim

Research and Design working characteristics of orthogonal turbine Nguyen Quoc Tuan (1), Chu Dinh Do (2), Quach Thi Son (2)

The Spalart Allmaras turbulence model

Workbench Tutorial Flow Over an Airfoil, Page 1 ANSYS Workbench Tutorial Flow Over an Airfoil

Stream Function-Vorticity CFD Solver MAE 6263

Tutorial 17. Using the Mixture and Eulerian Multiphase Models

Step 1: Create Geometry in GAMBIT

FEMLAB Exercise 1 for ChE366

Extension and Validation of the CFX Cavitation Model for Sheet and Tip Vortex Cavitation on Hydrofoils

Investigation of mixing chamber for experimental FGD reactor

Solution Recording and Playback: Vortex Shedding

CFD VALIDATION FOR SURFACE COMBATANT 5415 STRAIGHT AHEAD AND STATIC DRIFT 20 DEGREE CONDITIONS USING STAR CCM+

This tutorial illustrates how to set up and solve a problem involving solidification. This tutorial will demonstrate how to do the following:

STAR-CCM+ User Guide 6922

Calculate a solution using the pressure-based coupled solver.

Modeling Unsteady Compressible Flow

STAR-CCM+: Wind loading on buildings SPRING 2018

Investigation of cross flow over a circular cylinder at low Re using the Immersed Boundary Method (IBM)

CFD Analysis of a Fully Developed Turbulent Flow in a Pipe with a Constriction and an Obstacle

Chapter 1 Introduction

Driven Cavity Example

Workbench Tutorial Minor Losses, Page 1 Tutorial Minor Losses using Pointwise and FLUENT

SIMULATION OF PROPELLER-SHIP HULL INTERACTION USING AN INTEGRATED VLM/RANSE SOLVER MODELING.

Middle East Technical University Mechanical Engineering Department ME 485 CFD with Finite Volume Method Fall 2017 (Dr. Sert)

Flow and Heat Transfer in a Mixing Elbow

Comparison Between Numerical & PIV Experimental Results for Gas-Solid Flow in Ducts

Multi-Mesh CFD. Chris Roy Chip Jackson (1 st year PhD student) Aerospace and Ocean Engineering Department Virginia Tech

ITTC Recommended Procedures and Guidelines

Drag and Lift Validation of Wing Profiles

Verification and Validation in CFD and Heat Transfer: ANSYS Practice and the New ASME Standard

Tutorial 2. Modeling Periodic Flow and Heat Transfer

ANSYS AIM Tutorial Steady Flow Past a Cylinder

Estimation of Flow Field & Drag for Aerofoil Wing

Modeling Supersonic Jet Screech Noise Using Direct Computational Aeroacoustics (CAA) 14.5 Release

Modeling Evaporating Liquid Spray

Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis of an Idealized Modern Wingsuit

An Introduction to SolidWorks Flow Simulation 2010

Transcription:

Verification and Validation of Turbulent Flow around a Clark-Y Airfoil 1. Purpose 58:160 Intermediate Mechanics of Fluids CFD LAB 2 By Tao Xing and Fred Stern IIHR-Hydroscience & Engineering The University of Iowa C. Maxwell Stanley Hydraulics Laboratory Iowa City, IA 52242-1585 The Purpose of CFD Lab 2 is to simulate turbulent airfoil flows following CFD process by an interactive step-by-step approach and conduct verifications using CFD Educational Interface (FlowLab 1.2). Students will have hands-on experiences using FlowLab to conduct verification and validation for lift coefficient and pressure coefficient distributions, including effect of numerical scheme. Students will manually generate the O type and C type meshes and investigate the effect of domain size and effect of angle of attack on simulation results. Students will analyze the differences between CFD and EFD, analyze possible source of errors, and present results in the CFD Lab report. Geometry Physics Mesh Solve Report Post-processing Heat Transfer? Incompress -ible? Flow Properties Viscous Models Boundary Conditions Initial Conditions Select geometry Select domain Chord length Angle of attack Unstructured Structured Density and viscosity Laminar Turbulen Inviscid Clarky NACA12 LS(1) 0417 Import Profile One Eq. Two Eq. Automatic Manual SA k-e k-w Coarse Medium Iterations Convergent. Limit Precisions Contours Vectors Streamlines Flow Chart for ISTUE Teaching Module for Airfoil Flow (red color illustrates the options you will use in CFD Lab 2) Fine Single Double 1 st order 2 nd order QUICK Steady/ Unsteady? Numerical Schemes Wall shear stress Skin friction Factor Coefficient of lift XY plots Verification and validation Residuals Coefficient of drag Pressure coef. Distri. Shear stress Distri. Airfoil Y plus 1

2. Simulation Design The problem to be solved is that of turbulent flows around a Clark-Y airfoil. Reynolds number is 143,000 based on the inlet velocity and airfoil chord length. The following figures show the illustrations for C type and O type meshes. (Note: the figures are not in the exact scale as the true size of the domain and airfoil, as you will see in FlowLab). In CFD Lab2, Boundary conditions for C type of meshes will be inlet, outlet, symmetry, and airfoil, as described later. Boundary conditions for O type of meshes will be inlet, outlet, and airfoil. Uniform flow was specified at inlet. For outlet, zero gradients are fixed for all velocities and pressure is constant. No-slip boundary condition will be used on the airfoil. Symmetric boundary condition will be applied on the symmetry. All EFD data for turbulent airfoil flow in this Lab can be downloaded from class website. 3. CFD Process Step 1: (Geometry) 2

1. Select Geometry: Clark-Y 2. Chord length (0.3048 m) 3. Angle of attack (0 or 6, refer to exercises for details) 4. Circle Radius (5 meters except for exercise 1, where effect of domain size is studied) 5. Radius (Rc) for C mesh (5 meters) 6. Down stream length (Lo) for C mesh (12 meters). Click <<Create>>, after you see the airfoil geometry created in the graphic window, click <<Next>>. Step 2: (Physics) (1). With or without Heat Transfer? No thermal effects are considered in this lab, switch the <<Heat Transfer >> button OFF, which is the default setup. (2). Incompressible or compressible Choose Incompressible, which is the default setup. (3). Flow Properties 3

Use the values shown in the above figure. Input the values and click <<OK>>. (4). Viscous Model Choose turbulent model (k-e). (5). Boundary Conditions At Inlet, we use constant pressure and fix the velocity to 7.04m/s for turbulent airfoil flow. Use default values for k and e. At Outlet, FlowLab uses magnitude for pressure and zero gradients for axial and radial velocities. Input 0 for the Gauge pressure and click <<OK>>. On Airfoil, if flow is turbulent, FlowLab uses no-slip boundary conditions for velocities and zeropressure gradient. Turbulent quantities k and e are also specified to be zero. Read all the values and click <<OK>>. 4

For C type mesh, there is one additional boundary condition, i.e., Symmetry. (6). Initial Conditions Use the default setup for initial conditions. After specifying all the above parameters, click <<Compute>> button and FlowLab will automatically calculate the Reynolds number based on the inlet velocity and the airfoil chord length you specified. Click <<Next>>. This takes you to the next step, Mesh. Step 3: (Mesh) For CFD Lab 2, Structured meshes will be generated using either Automatic or Manual generations (see exercises at the end of this document for details). For Automatic generation, just choose the mesh density: coarse, medium or fine, and click <<Create>>, FlowLab will automatically create the mesh you required. For manually generation, you should first choose the Manual button, and then the following panel will be shown: 5

1. O mesh generation: to generate an O type mesh, you need to specify the number of intervals and the first length in grid spacing for NA1, NA2, NA3 and NA4, which are the four curves that form the airfoil geometry. Then choose the number of intervals and the grid spacing near airfoil for the edge NC1, which lays from the airfoil surface to the far-field. Finally choose Uniform distribution for NF1, NF2, NF3, and NF4, which are the four curves that form the far field circumference. Click <<Create>> after you input the parameters for each edge and then click <<Create>> in the mesh step window to generate the whole mesh. 2. C mesh generation: to generate a C type mesh, you need to specify NA1, NA2, NA3, RC, Symmetry, and inlet. For details on setting up those parameters, see exercises on C mesh generation. NOTE: When specifying parameters for NA1, NA2, NA3, NA4, you have to use the zoom in order to visualize the mesh distribution near the airfoil. Step 4: (Solve) In this Lab, both 1 st order and 2 nd order numerical schemes will be used (read exercises for details). 6

The flow is steady, so turn ON the Steady option. Specify the iteration number and convergence limit to be 10000 and 10-5, respectively. Choose Double precision with 1 st or 2 nd order scheme, based on which exercise you are working on. Use New calculation for this Lab. Then click <<Iterate>> and FlowLab will begin the calculation. Whenever you see the window, Solution Converged, click <<OK>>. NOTE: FlowLab stops a calculation when the maximum number of iterations or the convergence limit is reached, whatever happens first. In the first case, the Iterations complete window will be shown. In the second case, the Solution Converged window will be displayed. The iterative history of residuals for continuity equation, x and y momentum equations, and k and epsilon equations (for turbulent flow) will be shown automatically. 7

Step 5: (Reports) Reports first provides you the information on wall shear stress, skin friction factor, coefficient of lift, and coefficient of drag. XY plots provide plots for residuals, pressure distribution, pressure coefficient, and Shear Stress Distribution, etc. In this Lab, only XY plots for residuals and pressure coefficient are required. XY Plots provides the following options: 8

To import the EFD data and plot it on top of the above CFD results, just click <<File>> button and use the browse button to locate the file you want and click <<Import>>. Details have been described in previous CFD Lab 1 for pipe flow. In this Lab: 1. EFD data for pressure coefficient distribution for angle of attack of zero and six degrees can be downloaded from class website: http://css.engineering.uiowa.edu/~me_160, in the names of Pressure-coef-attack0.xy and Pressure-coef-attack06.xy, respectively. Verification and Validation In CFD Lab 2, you will conduct Verification and Validation studies using the manually mesh generation options (see exercise notes for details). The V&V panel is shown below. Whenever you manually create a mesh, that mesh will be automatically used as the default fine mesh for verification. 9

First input the refinement ratio used to create the coarse and medium meshes from the fine mesh. <<Monitor location>> is used to specify the locations for line monitors (for axial velocity profile only). In this Lab, we will do validation for pressure coefficient only, so, leave Monitor location as it was. The locations for the pressure coefficient have been hard coded in the software so you don t need to specify them by yourself. Click <<Run>> and FlowLab will conduct the simulation in the order of fine mesh medium mesh coarse mesh. The information on which mesh is being solved now will be displayed in the left bottom window. Whenever the V&V completed, you can select which variables you want to be shown for verification results. In this Lab, you will choose either lift coefficient or pressure coefficient. For lift coefficient, choose lift coef. under button <<Select Variables>>, then click Show Verification, you will get two tables: verification results table and the mesh convergence table. You need to save both. You can use <<Alt+printScreen>> to copy the active window and then paste it into a WORD document. To estimate how many iterations will be enough, you can click <<Calculate ei>> button and will see the following panel: 10

Choose <<Fine>> mesh and click <<Display>>, you will see the XY plot showing the lift coefficient as a function of iteration number. For pressure coefficient monitors, choose pressure coef. Monitor under <<Select Variables>>, and click <<Show Validation>>, then the following panel is shown, specify the experimental data uncertainty to be 42% (from EFD data). Click <<Import exp data>>, then 29 pressure coefficients will be shown. To make it simple, we have made the default values in the software same as the experimental data, so you do not need change them. 11

The locations of all 29 pressure transducers are shown below: Click <<Do Validation>>, the figures similar to the following will be shown: You can use the concepts of validation presented in the CFD lecture to explain which points are validated and which points are not and explain why. 12

Step 6: (Post-processing) Use the contour, vector buttons to show pressure contours and velocity vectors. All the details on how to plot those figures have been explained in details in CFD Lab 1 and the workshop. The following shows some sample results. To plot streamlines, first <<Deactivate>> contour and velocity vector, then click Streamline and <<Activate>>. Click <<Modify>> button and the contour variable will be stream-function. Usually, the default stream-function values range from the minimum to maximum through the whole domain. To illustrate the streamlines close to the airfoil surface, we need re-specify the range of stream-function values. Click <<Edit>>, using <<Lines>> instead of <<Bands>>. Specify appropriate contour intervals and minimum and maximum stream function values, then you can zoom in the region close to airfoil surface to show the streamlines, as you see in the figure below. 13

4. Exercises You need to complete the following assignments and present results in your lab report following the lab report instructions Verification and Validation of Turbulent Flow around a Clark-Y Airfoil You can save each case file for each exercise using file save as Except for exercise 5, all the cases must run with the turbulent model. Otherwise stated, use the parameters shown in the instruction. Otherwise stated (exercise 2), use 2 nd order scheme. 1. Effect of domain size: using the default values shown in the instruction, and choose automatic coarse mesh, run 5 simulations using five different domain sizes (as listed in the following table) for O meshes. Fill the table with lift coefficient with their relative difference between two successive meshes. If the relative change between two successive domain sizes should be less than 1%, then which domain sizes will be enough large to make the CFD simulation results to be independent of the domain size? Circle radius (m) 1 2 3 4 5 Lift Coefficient Relative change N/A ( )% ( )% ( )% ( )% Figures to be saved: None. Data to be saved: the above table with values. 14

2. Effect of numerical scheme on Verification study for lift coefficient and validation of pressure coefficient: Use O type geometry with 0 degree angle of attack. Use the parameters shown in the following table to manually generate the O mesh. For this exercise only, find one partner in the class to form a group, one student will run V&V using first order upwind scheme, the other will use 2 nd order upwind scheme. Then, you must borrow the figures/data from the other student and present in your lab report. NA1 NA2 NA3 NA4 NC1 NF1 NF2 NF3 NF4 Intervals 67 135 135 67 168 Uniform First 3.35e-4 1 2.2237e-3 1 2.2237e-3 3.35e-4 1.19e-4 length 2 2.2237e-4 2 2.2237e-4 Based on verification results for lift coefficient, which numerical scheme is closer to the asymptotic range? Which numerical scheme has a lower grid uncertainty? Discuss the validation figure. For which locations of 29 points the CFD simulation has been validated? For which locations the CFD simulation has not been validated? For iterative history of lift coefficient, what is the minimum iteration number for you to determine the lift coefficient has been converged to a constant value? NOTE: (1). You must create the mesh manually. The calculation time for a complete V&V could take around 40 minutes, depending on the computer you are using. (2). For V&V for lift coefficient and pressure coefficient, you don t need to specify line monitor locations. FlowLab has hard coded the pressure tap locations. Figures to be saved (only for the numerical scheme you used, but you must also present the figures for the calculations from your partner): 1. The O mesh you generated. 2. FlowLab Mesh Convergence panel and Verification panel for lift coefficient. 3. Validation figures for pressure coefficient. 4. Iterative history for lift coefficients on fine mesh. Data to be saved: None. 3. C mesh generation: Use C type domain and zero degree angle of attack for geometry and use the following parameters for mesh generation. Other parameters are the same as the values in the instruction part. NA1 NA2 NA3 Symmetry RC Inlet Intervals 40 30 30 40 75 Uniform 1 0.001 1 0.01 1 0.01 0.005 1.19e-4 2 0.001 2 0.006 2 0.006 Figures to be saved: C mesh generated by yourself. Data to be saved: converged lift coefficient. First length 4. Effect of angle of attack on airfoil flow: Using O, automatic coarse meshes, run two simulations using angle of attack 0 degrees and 6 degrees, respectively. Analyze the difference of flow fields. Which case has a higher lift coefficient, which has a higher drag coefficient? 15

Figures to be saved (for both attack angles): 1. pressure contours, 2. comparisons with EFD on pressure coefficient distribution, 3. velocity vectors near airfoil surface, 4. streamlines near the airfoil surface. Data need to be saved (for both attack angles): lift and drag coefficients. 5. Questions need to be answered when writing CFD report: 5.1. Answer all the questions in exercises 1 to 4 5.2. Analyze the difference between CFD/EFD and possible error sources. 16