NEWCASTLE CLINICAL TRIALS UNIT STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

Similar documents
NEWCASTLE CLINICAL TRIALS UNIT STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY RESEARCH OFFICE STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE. Loughborough University (LU) Research Office SOP 1027 LU

Guidance for Quality Control (QC) of CTU Study Document(s)

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE SOP 815. Clinical Data Management System LOCKING AND UNLOCKING THE DATABASE. Joint Research Office

Standard Operating Procedure. Data Management. Adapted with the kind permission of University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust

Standard Operating Procedure. SOP effective: 06 February 2017 Review date: 06 February 2019

Version Control of Study Specific Documents

EUROPEAN MEDICINES AGENCY (EMA) CONSULTATION

Standard Operating Procedure. SOP full title: Sponsor processes for reporting Suspected Unexpected Serious Adverse Reactions

SOP-QA-32 V2. Document History Version Description of update Date Effective 1 Change of number for Q-Pulse

UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER, UNIVERSITY OF LOUGHBOROUGH & UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS OF LEICESTER NHS TRUST JOINT RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT OFFICE

Chapter 10: Regulatory Documentation

BioInformatics A Roadmap To Success. Data Management Plans. Wes Rountree Associate Director of Data Management Family Health International

Data Management Dr Evelyn Flanagan

INFORMATION SECURITY AND RISK POLICY

Standard Operating Procedure. Preparation, Review and Approval of Clinical Research Standard Operating Procedures and Work Instructions

Standard Operating Procedure Clinical Data Management

SOP08: Standard Operating Procedure for Archiving at Trial Closure

Guide for Researchers: Online Human Ethics Application Form

This is a controlled document. The master document is posted on the JRCO website and any print-off of this document will be classed as uncontrolled.

CTO Provincial Study Closure Form

Australian Standard. Records Management. Part 1: General AS ISO ISO

General Guidance for Maintaining a Regulatory Binder

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Information and documentation Records management Part 1: General

University of Pennsylvania Institutional Review Board

Data validation and database lock down for RFL sponsored studies Document Number: 037

Reviewed by ADM(RS) in accordance with the Access to Information Act. Information UNCLASSIFIED.

Policy. Business Resilience MB2010.P.119

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SECURITY POLICY

Cancer Clinical Trials Centre Standard Operating Procedure

ABB Limited. Table of Content. Executive Summary

WITH MODIFICATIONS ), S, PHONE NUMBERS OR OTHER FORMS, PLEASE VISIT THE IRB S WEBSITE AT:

Reviewers Guide on Clinical Trials

1. Document Control 2. Change Record Version Date Author(s) Comments 3. Reviewers Version Name Organisation 4. Distribution Version Date Name Status

How to write ADaM specifications like a ninja.

Data Encryption Policy

19 March Assessment Policy for Qualifications and Part Qualifications on the Occupational Qualifications Sub-Framework (OQSF)

Guidance for the format and content of the final study report of non-interventional post-authorisation safety studies

Australian Standard. Records Management. Part 2: Guidelines AS ISO ISO TR

Data management for funding applications. RDCS training, 17 th March, 2014

Provider Monitoring Process

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS ZONING ORDINANCE

ERMS Folder Development and Access Process

National Policing Community Security Policy

DATA PRESERVATION AND SHARING INITIATIVE. 1. Aims of the EORTC QLG Data Repository project

01.0 Policy Responsibilities and Oversight

User Guide 16-Mar-2018

Student Guide. Click here to log in. A: Log in

ENCePP Code of Conduct Implementation Guidance for Sharing of ENCePP Study Data

Scientific Research Data Management Policy

ELECTRONIC RESEARCH STUDY APPLICATION (ERSA) INITIAL APPLICATION GUIDEBOOK. (Version date 03/03/2006)

Keele Clinical Trials Unit

DISCOVR-e USER MANUAL. Vanderbilt University Human Research Protection Program

Vaccine data collection tool Oct Functions, Indicators & Sub-Indicators

JRO RMG RSS SOP 12. Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for Study Closedown and Archiving

9 March Assessment Policy for Qualifications and Part Qualifications on the Occupational Qualifications Sub-Framework (OQSF)

CRITERIA FOR CERTIFICATION BODY ACCREDITATION IN THE FIELD OF RISK BASED INSPECTION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS

EA-7/05 - EA Guidance on the Application of ISO/IEC 17021:2006 for Combined Audits

Virginia State University Policies Manual. Title: Information Security Program Policy: 6110

European Medicines Agency Standard Operating Procedure

Request for Feedback. Manizhe Payton, MPH. Director Office of Clinical Site Oversight Division of AIDS February 22, 2017

Welcome Membership Update Sub-group / Initiatives update Investigator TMF Clarifications Sub-artifacts Observational Studies Exchange Mechanism

Internal Audit Follow-Up Report. Multiple Use Agreements TxDOT Office of Internal Audit

IRB News : Addition of a new application type for submitting reliance agreements

Version 11, JAN2017. Regulatory Document Approval Parameters for WebDCU TM POINT. People Document Collection REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS

Guide for Researchers: Online Human Ethics Application Form

ISO/IEC INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Software engineering Software measurement process. Ingénierie du logiciel Méthode de mesure des logiciels

Standard operating procedure

Certification Body Audit Resources

Audit Report. Mineral Products Qualifications Council (MPQC) 31 March 2014

Common Protocol Template (CPT) Frequently Asked Questions

Request the Creation and Changes to Security Access Groups

ELECTRONIC SITE DELEGATION LOG (esdl) USER MANUAL

Complaints Management

IRMA Researcher User Guide v2 DRAFT. IRMA Researcher User Guide

CONTINUOUS PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT (CPD) POLICY

IEEE-SA Standards Board Project Authorization Request (PAR) Form (2002)

Final Project Report

Timber Products Inspection, Inc.

VOCATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS ENTRY CODES 2017/18. ocr.org.uk

Research Data Management Procedures and Guidance

University of California, San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center Policy and Procedure. PRMS Amendment Submission Policy

Department of Veterans Affairs VA DIRECTIVE April 17, 2006 WEB PAGE PRIVACY POLICY

MNsure Privacy Program Strategic Plan FY

Common Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) Frequently Asked Questions

IRBManager Quick Start Guide INITIAL APPLICATION - OVERVIEW

Informed Consent and the Consent Form

Development of Requirement Specifications for Computer Systems

IRMA Human Ethics Researcher User Guide

Schedule Identity Services

Summary of PIC/S Guidance Good Practices for Data Management and Integrity in Regulated GMP/GDP Environments

Information Security Incident

1. STRATEGIC PLANNING

CALIFORNIA INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATOR CORPORATION FERC ELECTRIC TARIFF FIRST REPLACEMENT VOLUME NO. II Original Sheet No. 727 METERING PROTOCOL

Standard Setting and Revision Procedure

All you need to know about new processes for data submission (almost)

Online Reliance System FAQs

Introduction. Lesson 1 Access and Basic Navigation

BCS Higher Education Qualifications. Diploma in IT. Professional Issues in Information Systems Practice Syllabus

Transcription:

SOP details SOP title: Protocol development SOP number: TM 010 SOP category: Trial Management Version number: 03 Version date: 16 December 2016 Effective date: 16 January 2017 Revision due date: 16 January 2020 NEWCASTLE CLINICAL TRIALS UNIT STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES SOP author details Author name: Author position: Author signature: Date: Jill Peacock Quality Assurance Manager This electronic version is uncontrolled. The signed controlled copy is held in the Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit. SOP authoriser details Authoriser name: Authoriser position: Authoriser signature: Date: Professor Mark Walker Interim Director, Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit This electronic version is uncontrolled. The signed controlled copy is held in the Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit. STATEMENT This is a controlled document. The master document is held within NCTU with a controlled copy posted on the NCTU website: http://www.ncl.ac.uk/nctu/ Any print off of this document will be classed as uncontrolled and should not be filed. The reader is responsible for regularly checking the NCTU website for more recent versions. SOP NCTU: TM 010 Version: 03 Version date: 16 DEC 2016 Page 1 of 6

SOP revision record Version number Date Reason for revision 01 1 March 2013 Document release 02 14 th January 2014 Document revision 03 16 December 2016 Move onto new template, inclusion of NCTU standard protocol template and update Table of Contents 1. BACKGROUND... 3 2. PURPOSE... 3 3. SCOPE... 3 4. ROLES & RESPONSIBILITES... 3 5. ACRONYMS... 3 6. PROCEDURE... 4 6.1 Protocol development team membership... 4 6.2 Protocol authorship... 4 6.3 Content and format of the protocol... 4 6.4 Protocol development and version control... 5 6.5 Protocol sign off... 5 6.6 Protocol amendments... 5 7. REVIEW AND MONITORING OF THIS DOCUMENT... 6 8. ASSOCIATED DOCUMENTS... 6 SOP NCTU: TM 010 Version: 03 Version date: 16 DEC 2016 Page 2 of 6

1. BACKGROUND The protocol is the key document in a study and describes the objectives, design, methodology, statistical considerations, and organisation of a clinical study. The protocol is the responsibility of the research sponsor however the development of the protocol is frequently delegated to the Chief Investigator (CI). The CI may request the input of a multidisciplinary team of individuals to form a protocol development team to provide input into specific areas of the protocol according to the individual areas of expertise. 2. PURPOSE The purpose of this Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) is to describe the process for generating a clinical study protocol. 3. SCOPE This SOP applies to all Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit (NCTU) personnel involved in the development of a study protocol, in particular trial management and database management personnel. The SOP must be followed when NCTU are responsible for inputting into the development of a study protocol. 4. ROLES & RESPONSIBILITES The senior trial manager and trial manager are responsible for ensuring that the appropriate NCTU protocol template is used. Trial management personnel may provide guidance on all trial management aspects of the study to ensure compliance with the appropriate regulatory requirements. Specific input will be required regarding safety reporting, study monitoring, data protection and participant confidentiality as well as the definition of end of study. Database management personnel are responsible for the provision of guidance regarding the handling of study data including appropriate methods of data collection, provision of data for analysis and the archiving of the study database. The study statistician(s) are responsible for the provision of guidance regarding the statistical aspects of the study including sample size, endpoints and analyses. The CI should retain final responsibility for the quality check of the protocol and consistency with other study documentation e.g. participant information sheet and informed consent form, Case Report Forms (CRF) etc. 5. ACRONYMS CI CRF NCTU Chief Investigator Case Report Form Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit SOP NCTU: TM 010 Version: 03 Version date: 16 DEC 2016 Page 3 of 6

PDF SOP TMF TMG Portable Document Format Standard Operating Procedure Trial Master File Trial Management Group 6. PROCEDURE 6.1 Protocol development team membership The size and constitution of the protocol development team will depend on the nature, complexity and size of the clinical study and the expertise of the team members. The team will comprise the CI and personnel representing other disciplines as appropriate (including but not limited to trial manager, statistician, health economist, qualitative researcher etc.). A representative of the Sponsor and other external personnel may be involved, as appropriate. 6.2 Protocol authorship The protocol development team shall select a lead author to be responsible for the writing and production of the protocol. This is usually the CI for the study. The lead author shall collate relevant study information from the protocol development team members and present such information in the agreed format. 6.3 Content and format of the protocol The content of the protocol will vary according to the nature, complexity and size of the clinical study. For some studies it may be appropriate to develop a protocol synopsis prior to full protocol development for the purposes of funding applications and feasibility assessments. Once the research idea has been established, the protocol development team shall develop a draft protocol synopsis for review and approval. The synopsis may contain some or all of the following information: brief rationale for the study primary and secondary endpoints participant population and proposed recruitment numbers treatment schedule. The application to the funder will usually serve as the protocol synopsis. The protocol development team shall then use the approved synopsis as the basis for a full clinical study protocol. The NCTU protocol template must be used to ensure that all required sections are included in the protocol. Each protocol template is accompanied by a guidance document to describe the purpose and appropriate content for each section. The templates and associated guidance has consideration for the Health Research Authority guidance and SPIRIT recommendations therefore should not be amended unless within the remit of the template e.g. removal of the blinding section for open label studies. In the event that the NCTU protocol template cannot be used (e.g. where the funder or sponsor dictates the use of their SOP NCTU: TM 010 Version: 03 Version date: 16 DEC 2016 Page 4 of 6

own template) or there is a strong requirement to deviate from the template then this decision must be agreed by the Trial Management Group (TMG) and documented in the Trial Master File (TMF). 6.4 Protocol development and version control The protocol development team shall agree the content of the protocol through face to face meetings, conference calls and/or email communications. The lead author shall collate comments and changes to the protocol throughout the development cycle. Comments on the protocol will normally be provided to the author as tracked changes within the document or via email correspondence. The lead author will be responsible for collating reviewer comments and resolving any conflicting comments. The lead author shall incorporate the consolidated comments and the protocol shall be circulated for further review as necessary. When a consensus has been reached the protocol will be finalised and signed off. The protocol shall be stored on the assigned project specific drive thus ensuring the document is backed up on a regular basis. The file name structure should follow the requirements of the sponsor or those of NCTU if the sponsor does not have a specific naming convention. It is recommended that the protocol first submitted to the ethics committee/regulatory authority is documented as version 01 or 1.0. Therefore drafts prior to the first submission must be numbered as version 0.1, 0.2 etc. All draft versions must be retained in an electronic format, e.g. as Portable Document Format (PDF), in the specific trial folder in the NCTU shared drive. The lead author is responsible for document control, i.e. shall always be considered to have the latest version of the protocol document, and for implementing any changes to the document that may be required during the development process. Further information on document control is included in NCTU SOP GE 003. 6.5 Protocol sign off When finalised, the protocol must be signed off by a representative of the sponsor to demonstrate the sponsor authorisation of the protocol and the CI as confirmation of their agreement to comply with the protocol. The NCTU protocol template requires that the following key members of the protocol development team sign the protocol: Senior or Trial Statistician Trial Manager Database Manager Additional key members of the protocol development team may also sign the protocol (e.g. the senior trial manager, health economist etc.) as negotiated and agreed by the TMG. 6.6 Protocol amendments It is sometimes necessary to amend the protocol after finalisation. A protocol amendment may be required following regulatory or ethical review or if information or study procedures contained within the protocol change. Any amendments to the clinical trial protocol SOP NCTU: TM 010 Version: 03 Version date: 16 DEC 2016 Page 5 of 6

following sign off shall be incorporated into the protocol by the lead author, or other agreed member of the protocol development team. All changes to the protocol must be documented either as tracked changes within a new version of the protocol or tabulated in a separate document. The amended protocol shall be reviewed and signed off as described above. The current version of the protocol and all superseded versions shall be filed in the TMF. 7. REVIEW AND MONITORING OF THIS DOCUMENT This SOP will be reviewed every three years unless there is a change to the applicable legislation or significant revision to the process contained in the SOP. The use of this SOP will be monitored by the senior trial managers working on individual studies. It will also be monitored by the Quality Assurance Manager through the annual internal audit schedule. 8. ASSOCIATED DOCUMENTS NCTU SOP GE 003 Document Control NCTU Protocol Templates NCTU Protocol Template Guidance documents SOP NCTU: TM 010 Version: 03 Version date: 16 DEC 2016 Page 6 of 6