Introduction to MPLS. What is MPLS? 1/23/17. APNIC Technical Workshop January 23 to 25, NZNOG2017, Tauranga, New Zealand. [201609] Revision:

Similar documents
Introduction to MPLS APNIC

Configuring MLPPP. Finding Feature Information

Segment Routing MPLS OAM Support

MPLS LSP Ping Traceroute for LDP TE and LSP Ping for VCCV

MPLS LSP Ping/Traceroute for LDP/TE, and LSP Ping for VCCV

MPLS for R&S CCIE Candidates

MPLS EM MPLS LSP Multipath Tree Trace

Table of Contents Chapter 1 MPLS Basics Configuration

MPLS Point-to-Multipoint Traffic Engineering Support for Static Pseudowires

MPLS VPN. 5 ian 2010

HP Routing Switch Series

Computer Network Architectures and Multimedia. Guy Leduc. Chapter 2 MPLS networks. Chapter 2: MPLS

HP 5920 & 5900 Switch Series

Table of Contents. Cisco MPLS FAQ For Beginners

Multiprotocol Label Switching Virtual Private Network

MPLS Ping and Traceroute for BGP and IGP Prefix-SID

Using Segment Routing OAM

Securizarea Calculatoarelor și a Rețelelor 32. Tehnologia MPLS VPN

Segment Routing MPLS OAM Support

Cisco. Maintaining Cisco Service Provider VPNs and MPLS Networks (MSPVM)

HP MSR Router Series. MPLS Configuration Guide(V7) Part number: Software version: CMW710-R0106 Document version: 6PW

SDN Workshop. Contact: WSDN01_v0.1

MPLS etc.. MPLS is not alone TEST. 26 April 2016 AN. Multi-Protocol Label Switching MPLS-TP FEC PBB-TE VPLS ISIS-TE MPƛS GMPLS SR RSVP-TE OSPF-TE PCEP

Multi Protocol Label Switching (an introduction) Karst Koymans. Thursday, March 12, 2015

MPLS, THE BASICS CSE 6067, UIU. Multiprotocol Label Switching

AToM (Any Transport over MPLS)

Label Distribution Protocol and Basic MPLS Configuration. APNIC Technical Workshop October 23 to 25, Selangor, Malaysia Hosted by:

LARGE SCALE IP ROUTING LECTURE BY SEBASTIAN GRAF

Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) on Cisco Routers

Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS)

2D1490 p MPLS, RSVP, etc. Olof Hagsand KTHNOC/NADA

MPLS Intro. Cosmin Dumitru March 14, University of Amsterdam System and Network Engineering Research Group ...

MPLS MULTI PROTOCOL LABEL SWITCHING OVERVIEW OF MPLS, A TECHNOLOGY THAT COMBINES LAYER 3 ROUTING WITH LAYER 2 SWITCHING FOR OPTIMIZED NETWORK USAGE

Pseudowire Concepts and troubleshooting

Troubleshooting LSP Failure in MPLS VPN

MPLS etc.. 9 May 2017 AN

PrepAwayExam. High-efficient Exam Materials are the best high pass-rate Exam Dumps

Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) on Cisco Routers

HP MSR Router Series. MPLS Configuration Guide(V5) Part number: Software version: CMW520-R2513 Document version: 6PW

MPLS опорни мрежи MPLS core networks

Ahmed Benallegue RMDCN workshop on the migration to IP/VPN 1/54

MPLS LSP Ping, Traceroute, and AToM VCCV

MPLS Multi-protocol label switching Mario Baldi Politecnico di Torino (Technical University of Torino)

سوي يچينگ و مسيريابي در شبكه

Configuring MPLS L2VPN

Configuring MPLS L2VPN

H3C S7500E-XS Switch Series

HP A-MSR Router Series MPLS. Configuration Guide. Abstract

MPLS Multi-Protocol Label Switching

MPLS. 9 March 2018 AN

What You Will Learn By the end of this appendix, you should know and be able to explain the following:

Implementing MPLS Forwarding

MPLS Introduction. (C) Herbert Haas 2005/03/11

Introduction to Multi-Protocol Label

ENTERPRISE MPLS. Kireeti Kompella

MPLS LDP. Agenda. LDP Overview LDP Protocol Details LDP Configuration and Monitoring 9/27/16. Nurul Islam Roman

Configuring MPLS L2VPN

Vendor: Alcatel-Lucent. Exam Code: 4A Exam Name: Alcatel-Lucent Multiprotocol Label Switching. Version: Demo

MPLS MPLS. Basically: 9 March 2018 AN. Multi-Protocol Label Switching. A bit of history. Multi-Protocol Label Switching.

CCIE R&S Techtorial MPLS

Configuration Guide - MPLS

Multi Protocol Label Switching

MPLS Embedded Management LSP Ping/Traceroute and AToM VCCV

CONTENTS. Introduction

Segment Routing Commands

Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS)

H3C S9500 Series Routing Switches

BrainDumps.4A0-103,230.Questions

CCIE Service Provider Sample Lab. Part 2 of 7

Syed Mehar Ali Shah 1 and Bhaskar Reddy Muvva Vijay 2* 1-

Multiprotocol Label Switching Overview

Trafffic Engineering 2015/16 1

Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) on Cisco Routers

MIT International Journal of Electrical and Instrumentation Engineering Vol. 3, No. 1, Jan. 2013, pp

MPLS Core Networks Николай Милованов/Nikolay Milovanov

Ping, tracert and system debugging commands

COMP9332 Network Routing & Switching

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Obsoletes: 4379, 6424, 6829, 7537

Configuring MPLS, MPLS VPN, MPLS OAM, and EoMPLS

Operation Manual MPLS. Table of Contents

Practice exam questions for the Nokia NRS II Composite Exam

MPLS Troubleshooting. Contents. Prerequisites. Document ID: Requirements. Components Used

Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS)

February Detecting Multi-Protocol Label Switched (MPLS) Data Plane Failures

Testking.4A0-103,249.QA 4A Alcatel-Lucent Multi Protocol Label Switching

Multi-Protocol Label Switching

Multiprotocol Label Switching

Multiprotocol Label Switching

L2VPN Interworking. Finding Feature Information

Configuring Static MPLS

Next Generation MULTICAST In-band Signaling (VRF MLDP: Profile 6)

LARGE SCALE IP ROUTING LECTURE BY SEBASTIAN GRAF

H3C SR6600 Routers. MPLS Configuration Guide. Hangzhou H3C Technologies Co., Ltd.

Module 11a MPLS VPWS Configuration Lab (LDP)

Concepts and Operation of MPLS VPNs. Francisco Bolanos

Configuring MPLS Transport Profile

Exam : Title : Implementing Cisco MPLS Exam (MPLS) Ver :

MPLS Forwarding Commands

MPLS/Tag Switching. Background. Chapter Goals CHAPTER

Troubleshooting End-to-End MPLS

Transcription:

Introduction to MPLS APNIC Technical Workshop January 23 to 25, 2017. NZNOG2017, Tauranga, New Zealand. Issue Date: [201609] Revision: [01] What is MPLS? 2 1

Definition of MPLS Multi Protocol Label Switching Multiprotocol, it supports ANY network layer protocol, i.e. IPv4, IPv6, IPX, CLNP, etc. A short label of fixed length is used to encapsulate packets Packets are forwarded by label switching instead of by IP switching 3 Initial Motivation of MPLS In mid 1990s, IP address lookup was considered more complex and taking longer time. -- Logical AND && -- Longest matching IP Forwarding Table Address Prefix I/F 128.89/16 171.69/16 1 0 IP Forwarding Table Address Prefix I/F 128.89/16 171.69/16 0 1 IP Forwarding Table Address Prefix I/F 128.89/16 171.69/16 0 1 128.89 1 0 128.89.25.4 Data 128.89.25.4 Data 128.89.25.4 Data 0 128.89.25.4 Data A label-swapping protocol was the need for speed. 4 2

Decoupling Routing and Forwarding MPLS can allow core routers to switch packets based on some simplified header. 128.89 1 0 1 0 128.89.25.4 Data 20 128.89.25.4 Data 30 128.89.25.4 Data 128.89.25.4 Data 0 But, hardware of routers became better and looking up longest best match was no longer an issue. More importantly, MPLS de-couples forwarding from routing, and support multiple service models. 1 5 MPLS vs IP over ATM 10.1.1.1 10.1.1.1 10.1.1.1 10.1.1.1 10.1.1.1 10.1.1.1 10.1.1.1 IP over ATM Layer 2 topology may be different from Layer 3 topology, resulting in suboptimal paths. Layer 2 devices have no knowledge of Layer 3 routing virtual circuits must be manually established. 10.1.1.1 L=3/1 L=2/4 L=4/8 10.1.1.1 MPLS Layer 2 devices run a Layer 3 routing protocol and establish virtual circuits dynamically based on Layer 3 information. MPLS provides a virtual full mesh topology. 6 3

MPLS VPN VPN B Site 1 CE PE P P PE CE VPNA Site 1 VPNA Site 2 CE PE P MPLS Core PE CE VPN B Site 2 MPLS Layer 3/ Layer 2 VPN CE VPN B Site 3 7 Optimal Traffic Engineering Tunnel 1 R3 R1 R2 R6 Tunnel 2 R4 R5 IP TE Shortest path Equal cost load balancing MPLS TE Determines the path at the source based on additional parameters (available resources and constraints, etc.) Load sharing across unequal paths can be achieved. 8 4

MPLS QoS MPLS does NOT define a new QoS architecture. Similar parts with IP DiffServ: functional components and where they are used.(such as marking and traffic policing at network edge, etc) Difference: packets are differentiated by MPLS Traffic Class bits MPLS Header Traffic Class DSCP - Packet VPN Site IP Domain CE PE P P MPLS Domain QoS in MPLS VPN Architecture 9 Technology Comparison IP Native Ethernet MPLS Forwarding Destination address based Forwarding table learned from control plane TTL support Destination address based Forwarding table learned from data plane No TTL support Label based Forwarding table learned from control plane TTL support Control Plane Routing protocols Ethernet loop avoidance Routing protocols Label distribution protocols Packet Encapsulation IP header 802.3 header MPLS Header QoS 8 bit TOS in IP header 3 bit 802.1p in VLAN tag 3 bit TC in label OAM IP Ping, traceroute E-OAM MPLS Ping, traceroute 10 5

Evolution of MPLS Technology Evolution and Main Growth Areas 1996, Ipsilon, Cisco and IBM announced label switching plans, till now, there are over 280 RFCs of MPLS tech. Optimize MPLS for Cloud Today Optimize MPLS for packet transport Optimize MPLS for video Complete base MPLS portfolio Bring MPLS to Market Large Scale First MPLS L3VPN &TE Deployed First L2VPN Deployments L2VPN Deployments Large Scale Large Formation of the IETF MPLS working group First MPLS RFCs Released L3VPN Deployments Scale MPLS TE Deployed First LSM Deployme nts First MPLS TP Deployments 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 11 MPLS Application Scenario MPLS CORE L3VPN TE Main Path for PE1-PE3 Enterprise Enterprise PE1 P P PE3 Enterprise L2VPN P P L2VPN PE2 TE Backup Path for PE1-PE3 PE4 Enterprise QoS Operations : Traffic marking, police, shaping QoS Operations: Congestion management, congestion avoidance QoS Operations: Traffic marking, police, shaping 12 6

Questions? MPLS Technology Basics 14 7

MPLS Architecture Routing Information Exchange with other routers IP Routing Protocols Label Binding and Exchange with other routers Control Plane Routing Information Base (RIB) Label Distribution Protocols Label Information Base (LIB) Data Plane Incoming Forwarding Information Base (FIB) Label Forwarding Information Base (LFIB) Incoming Labeled Packet 15 MPLS Topology MPLS Domain Label Label Label IP Domain Edge Edge IP Domain (Label Switch Router) is a router that supports MPLS. LER (Label Edge Router), also called edge, is an that operates at the edge of an MPLS network. LSP (Label Switched Path) is the path through the MPLS network or a part of it that packets take. 16 8

MPLS Label MPLS Label Encapsulation Datalink Layer Header MPLS Label Layer 2/ Layer 3 Packet 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 Label - 20bits TC S TTL-8bits TC = Traffic Class: 3 Bits;; S = Bottom of Stack: 1 Bit;; TTL = Time to Live 17 MPLS Label Stacking LAN MAC Label Header MAC Header Label S Label S Layer 3 Packet S=0 S=1 Bottom of Stack Bit Set MPLS Label Stack Multiple labels can be used for MPLS packet encapsulation. network. This is done by packing the labels into a stack. Some MPLS applications (VPN, etc.) actually need more than one labels in the label stack to forward the labeled packets. 18 9

LSP Setup Overview Before forwarding packets, labels must be allocated to establish an LSP. Protocols for label distribution: LDP, RSVP-TE, MP-BGP. Upstream To 100.1.1.1/32 Label=100 To 100.1.1.1/32 Label=200 To 100.1.1.1/32 Label=300 Downstream LSP R1 R2 R3 R4 Establishing an LSP Labels are allocated from downstream s to upstream s. 100.1.1.1/32 19 Basic Concepts of MPLS Forwarding FEC Forwarding Equivalence Class, is a group or flow of packets that are forwarded along the same path and are treated the same with regard to the forwarding treatment. For example, packets with Layer 3 destination IP address matching a certain prefix. Push A new label is added to the packet between the Layer 2 header and the IP header or to the top of the label stack. Swap The top label is removed and replaced with a new label. Pop The top label is removed. The packet is forwarded with the remaining label stack or as an unlabeled packet. 20 10

MPLS Forwarding Operations Local Label Null Local Label 100 Local Label 200 Local Label 300 Out Interface E1 Out Interface E1 Out Interface E1 Out Interface -- Out Label 100 Out Label 200 Out Label 300 Out Label -- Operation Push Operation Swap Operation Swap Operation POP 100 IP:100.1.1.1 200 IP:100.1.1.1 300 IP:100.1.1.1 Push Swap Swap Pop E1 E0 E1 E0 E1 E0 R1 R2 R3 R4 100.1.1.1/32 21 Why Penultimate Hop Popping? Review what R4 has done: Local Label Null Local Label 100 Local Label 200 1. First, lookup the label in the LFIB;; Out Interface E1 Out Interface E1 Out Interface E1 Remove the label Out Label 100 Out Label 200 Out Label 300 2. Then, IP lookup and forward IP packet. Operation Push Operation Swap Operation Swap Local Label 300 Out Interface -- Out Label -- Operation POP Is the first lookup 100 IP:100.1.1.1 necessary? Can we simplify it? 200 IP:100.1.1.1 300 IP:100.1.1.1 Push Swap Swap Pop E1 E0 E1 E0 E1 E0 R1 R2 R3 R4 100.1.1.1/32 22 11

Penultimate Hop Popping Local Label Null Local Label 100 Local Label 200 Local Label imp-null Out Interface E1 Out Interface E1 Out Interface E1 Out Interface -- Out Label 100 Out Label 200 Out Label imp-null Out Label -- Operation Push Operation Swap Operation Pop Operation -- 100 IP:100.1.1.1 200 IP:100.1.1.1 IP:100.1.1.1 Push Swap Pop E1 E0 E1 E0 E1 E0 R1 R2 R3 R4 100.1.1.1/32 The implicit NULL label is the label that has a value of 3, the label 3 will never be seen as a label in the label stack of an MPLS packet. 23 MPLS TTL Processing (1) Only the TTL in the top level decreased Decreased & Copied Decreased & Copied TTL=251 TTL=250 TTL=250 TTL=249 TTL=250 TTL=248 TTL=247 IP Domain Edge Edge IP Domain MPLS Domain MPLS processes the TTL to prevent loops and implement traceroute. By default, TTL propagation is enabled as above. 24 12

MPLS TTL Processing (2) After disabled TTL propagation Decreased Set 255 Only the TTL in the top level decreased Decreased TTL=251 TTL=255 TTL=250 TTL=254 TTL=250 TTL=249 TTL=248 IP Domain Edge Edge IP Domain MPLS Domain TTL propagation can be disabled to hide the MPLS network topology. Disabling TTL propagation makes routers set the value 255 into the TTL field of the label when an IP packet is labeled. 25 MPLS LSP Ping R1#ping mpls ipv4 4.4.4.4/32 Sending 5, 100-byte MPLS Echos to 4.4.4.4/32, timeout is 2 seconds, send interval is 0 msec: Codes: '!' - success, 'Q' - request not sent, '.' - timeout, 'L' - labeled output interface, 'B' - unlabeled output interface, 'D' - DS Map mismatch, 'F' - no FEC mapping, 'f' - FEC mismatch, 'M' - malformed request, 'm' - unsupported tlvs, 'N' - no label entry, 'P' - no rx intf label prot, 'p' - premature termination of LSP, 'R' - transit router, 'I' - unknown upstream index, 'l' - Label switched with FEC change, 'd' - see DDMAP for return code, 'X' - unknown return code, 'x' - return code 0 Type escape sequence to abort.!!!!! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 12/14/16 ms Total Time Elapsed 128 ms Cisco IOS MPLS Echo Request MPLS Domain 4.4.4.4/32 R1 R2 R3 MPLS Echo R4 Reply 26 13

MPLS LSP Trace R1#traceroute mpls ipv4 4.4.4.4/32 Tracing MPLS Label Switched Path to 4.4.4.4/32, timeout is 2 seconds Codes: '!' - success, 'Q' - request not sent, '.' - timeout, 'L' - labeled output interface, 'B' - unlabeled output interface, 'D' - DS Map mismatch, 'F' - no FEC mapping, 'f' - FEC mismatch, 'M' - malformed request, 'm' - unsupported tlvs, 'N' - no label entry, 'P' - no rx intf label prot, 'p' - premature termination of LSP, 'R' - transit router, 'I' - unknown upstream index, 'l' - Label switched with FEC change, 'd' - see DDMAP for return code, 'X' - unknown return code, 'x' - return code 0 Type escape sequence to abort. 0 12.1.1.1 MRU 1500 [Labels: 200 Exp: 0] L 1 12.1.1.2 MRU 1500 [Labels: 19 Exp: 0] 16 ms L 2 23.1.1.2 MRU 1504 [Labels: implicit-null Exp: 0] 12 ms! 3 34.1.1.2 12 ms Cisco IOS MPLS Domain 4.4.4.4/32 R1 R2 R3 R4 27 IP MTU MTU indicates the maximum size of the IP packet that can still be sent on a data link, without fragmenting the packet. TCP MSS IP Header TCP Header IP MTU Ethernet MTU Payload 20 byte 20 byte 1460 byte size=1500 DF=1 PASS PASS PASS R1 R2 R3 R4 MTU=1500 MTU=1500 MTU=1500 IP Domain 28 14

MPLS MTU Issue In MPLS L3VPN network, 2 labels are added into the packet, the labeled packets are slightly bigger than the IP packets. This would lead to the need to fragment the packet. IP MTU Ethernet MTU TCP MSS LDP Label VPN Label 4 byte 4 byte IP Header TCP Header Payload 20 byte 20 byte 1460 byte Labeled Packet size=1508 DF=1 DROP R1 R2 R3 R4 MTU=1500 MTU=1500 MTU=1500 MPLS Domain 29 How to Optimize Fragmentation? Solution 1. Change MPLS MTU: Make sure that you configure this value on all the links in the path so that the packets are not dropped. (on Cisco IOS) R1(config)#interface ethernet1/0 R1(config-if)#mpls mtu 1508 R1#show mpls interfaces Ethernet 1/0 detail Interface Ethernet1/0: IP labeling enabled LSP Tunnel labeling not enabled BGP labeling not enabled MPLS not operational MTU = 1508 Solution 2. Change the TCP MSS to be smaller: R1(config)#interface ethernet 1/0 R1(config-if)#ip tcp adjust-mss 1452 30 15

Questions? 16