Processed :36:54 Average Ground Sampling Distance (GSD) Time for Initial Processing (without report)

Similar documents
28 out of 28 images calibrated (100%), all images enabled. 0.02% relative difference between initial and optimized internal camera parameters

Quality Report Generated with Pro version

Near-Infrared Dataset. 101 out of 101 images calibrated (100%), all images enabled

Paris-Le Bourget Airport. 557 out of 557 images calibrated (100%), all images enabled

Laptop Generated Quality Report Phase 1 Time 00h:26m:45s Phase 2 Time 02h:30m:06s Phase 3 Time 01h:20m:19s Total Time All phases 04h:17m:10s

Quality Report Generated with Pix4Dmapper Pro version

Quality Report Generated with Pix4Dmapper Pro version

Quality Report Generated with Postflight Terra 3D version

Quality Report Generated with Pro version

Quality Report Generated with version

Quality Report Generated with Pix4Ddiscovery version

Quality Report Generated with version

Getting Started with Pix4D for Agriculture 3.3

Drone2Map: an Introduction. October 2017

Tutorial (Beginner level): Orthomosaic and DEM Generation with Agisoft PhotoScan Pro 1.3 (with Ground Control Points)

Introduction. Acute3D S.A.S. WTC Valbonne Sophia Antipolis. 120 route des Macarons.

Tutorial (Beginner level): Orthomosaic and DEM Generation with Agisoft PhotoScan Pro 1.3 (without Ground Control Points)

Geometry of Aerial photogrammetry. Panu Srestasathiern, PhD. Researcher Geo-Informatics and Space Technology Development Agency (Public Organization)

TRAINING MATERIAL HOW TO OPTIMIZE ACCURACY WITH CORRELATOR3D

2. POINT CLOUD DATA PROCESSING

Drone2Map for ArcGIS: Bring Drone Imagery into ArcGIS. Will

Generating highly accurate 3D data using a sensefly exom drone

Photogrammetric Performance of an Ultra Light Weight Swinglet UAV

Aerial Triangulation Report 2016 City of Nanaimo Aerial Mapping Project

GEOSYSTEMS... 2 UAV Workflow ERDAS IMAGINE UAV Feature Overview Section ERDAS IMAGINE UAV Feature... 2

Digital Photogrammetric System. Version 5.3 USER GUIDE. Processing of UAV data

New Features In TerraPhoto. What s New in Terrasolid v011? Webinar 15 February Feb 2011 What's New in Terrasolid v011? 2

Real-time Image-based Reconstruction of Pipes Using Omnidirectional Cameras

Producing Ortho Imagery In ArcGIS. Hong Xu, Mingzhen Chen, Ringu Nalankal

Multiray Photogrammetry and Dense Image. Photogrammetric Week Matching. Dense Image Matching - Application of SGM

DENSE 3D POINT CLOUD GENERATION FROM UAV IMAGES FROM IMAGE MATCHING AND GLOBAL OPTIMAZATION

Geomatica OrthoEngine Orthorectifying VEXCEL UltraCam Data

Simply powerful. Pix4Dmapper features the raycloud. Read more on Next generation aerial image processing software

SimActive and PhaseOne Workflow case study. By François Riendeau and Dr. Yuri Raizman Revision 1.0

Files Used in this Tutorial

Accuracy Assessment of POS AVX 210 integrated with the Phase One ixu150

RELEASE NOTES FOR PHOTOMESH 7.5.1

A step by step introduction to TopoFlight

Photogrammetry: DTM Extraction & Editing

Assessing 3D Point Cloud Fidelity of UAS SfM Software Solutions Over Varying Terrain

2018 SimActive Inc. All rights reserved.

Product information. Hi-Tech Electronics Pte Ltd

A Systems View of Large- Scale 3D Reconstruction

Camera Drones Lecture 3 3D data generation

Exterior Orientation Parameters

Automated Air Photo Orthorectification and Mosaicking Geomatica 2015 Tutorial

Automating Data Alignment from Multiple Collects Author: David Janssen Optech Incorporated,Senior Technical Engineer

ifp Universität Stuttgart Performance of IGI AEROcontrol-IId GPS/Inertial System Final Report

PERFORMANCE OF LARGE-FORMAT DIGITAL CAMERAS

AIRPHEN. The Multispectral camera from HIPHEN

COMPARISON OF LASER SCANNING, PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND SfM-MVS PIPELINE APPLIED IN STRUCTURES AND ARTIFICIAL SURFACES

ADVANCING REALITY MODELING WITH CONTEXTCAPTURE

Agisoft PhotoScan Change Log

A New Protocol of CSI For The Royal Canadian Mounted Police

NAME :... Signature :... Desk no. :... Question Answer

NX Tutorial - Centroids and Area Moments of Inertia ENAE 324 Aerospace Structures Spring 2015

EVOLUTION OF POINT CLOUD

USE OF VERTICAL AERIAL IMAGES FOR SEMI-OBLIQUE MAPPING

Designing Horn Antenna utilizing FEM Symmetry Boundary Conditions

ADS40 Calibration & Verification Process. Udo Tempelmann*, Ludger Hinsken**, Utz Recke*

Files Used in this Tutorial

The use of different data sets in 3-D modelling

Mosaicking Software: A comparison of various software suites. Geosystems Research Institute Report 5071

arxiv: v1 [cs.cv] 28 Sep 2018

UAS to GIS Utilizing a low-cost Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) for Coastal Erosion Monitoring

Subpixel accurate refinement of disparity maps using stereo correspondences

Project 1, 467. (Note: This is not a graphics class. It is ok if your rendering has some flaws, like those gaps in the teapot image above ;-)

DERIVING PEDESTRIAN POSITIONS FROM UNCALIBRATED VIDEOS

Visualizing 2D Data in a 3D World

3D Computer Vision. Depth Cameras. Prof. Didier Stricker. Oliver Wasenmüller

OUTDOOR AND INDOOR NAVIGATION WITH MICROSOFT KINECT

COMBINED BUNDLE BLOCK ADJUSTMENT VERSUS DIRECT SENSOR ORIENTATION ABSTRACT

THE INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR CALIBRATION FOR ULTRACAM D

VOLUME COMPUTATION OF A STOCKPILE A STUDY CASE COMPARING GPS AND UAV MEASUREMENTS IN AN OPEN PIT QUARRY

Virtual and remote inspection methods

POINT CLOUD ANALYSIS FOR ROAD PAVEMENTS IN BAD CONDITIONS INTRODUCTION

3DReshaper Help 2017 MR1. 3DReshaper Beginner's Guide. Image

UAV s in Surveying: Integration/processes/deliverables A-Z. 3Dsurvey.si

Ingesting, Managing, and Using UAV (Drone) Imagery in the ArcGIS Platform

P h a s e O n e i X U - RS A c c u r a c y A n a l y s i s. T h e f o r e f r o n t o f a e r i a l p h o t o g r a p h y

PHOTOGRAMMETRIC SOLUTIONS OF NON-STANDARD PHOTOGRAMMETRIC BLOCKS INTRODUCTION

3D FeatureXtract User s Guide. Powered by the GeoSPHERIC v3.0 Common Code Foundation

Other approaches to obtaining 3D structure

XXV FIG International Congress KUALA LUMPUR Highly Detailed 3D Modelling of Mayan Cultural Heritage using an UAV

QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF COMBINED IMU/GNSS DATA FOR DIRECT GEOREFERENCING IN THE CONTEXT OF UAV-BASED MAPPING

On Grid: Tools and Techniques to Place Reality Data in a Geographic Coordinate System

Presented at the FIG Congress 2018, May 6-11, 2018 in Istanbul, Turkey

Introduction to Mobile Robotics Techniques for 3D Mapping

Chapters 1 9: Overview

Oblique Image Processing in SURE - First Experiments and Results

Determination of suitable requirements for Geometric Correction of remote sensing Satellite Images when Using Ground Control Points

MODEL DEFORMATION ACCURACY OF DIGITAL FRAME CAMERAS

AIT Inline Computational Imaging: Geometric calibration and image rectification

StereoCAD Professional software for inspection measure Draw 3D vectors INTRODUCTION FOR BASIC USAGE

RealWorks Software. A Powerful 3D Laser Scanning Office Software Suite

Hand-eye calibration with a depth camera: 2D or 3D?

PHOTOGRAMMETRIC METHOD:

BE INSPIRED.

Introduction. Prerequisites. Ballbar - QC20-W - Analysis LAST UPDATED: 12/01/2018

STEP-BY-STEP GUIDE. To produce high-quality results, consider the following best practices before starting processing:

Transcription:

Important: Click on the different icons for: Dronedata Back Office Server Generated Quality Report Phase 1 Time 07h:33m:02s Phase 2 Time 02h:58m:08s Phase 3 Time Not Applicable Total Time All Phases 10h:31m:08s Generated with Pix4Dmapper Pro - TRIAL version 2.0.104 Help to analyze the results in the Quality Report Additional information about the sections Click here for additional tips to analyze the Quality Report Summary Project Bridge Column Inspection Processed 2016-02-11 02:36:54 Average Ground Sampling Distance (GSD) 0.1 cm / 0.03 in Time for Initial Processing (without report) 07h:33m:02s Quality Check Images Dataset Camera Optimization Matching Georeferencing median of 39660 keypoints per image 151 out of 151 images calibrated (100%), all images enabled 0.06% relative difference between initial and optimized internal camera parameters median of 20413.9 matches per calibrated image, no 3D GCP Calibration Details Number of Calibrated Images 151 out of 151 Number of Geolocated Images 151 out of 151 Initial Image Positions Figure 2: Top view of the initial image position. The green line follows the position of the images in time starting from the large blue dot.

Computed Image/GCPs/Manual Tie Points Positions Figure 3: Offset between initial (blue dots) and computed (green dots) image positions as well as the offset between the GCPs initial positions (blue crosses) and their computed positions (green crosses) in the top-view (XY plane), front-view (XZ plane), and side-view (YZ plane). Bundle Block Adjustment Details Number of 2D Keypoint Observations for Bundle Block Adjustment 2922816 Number of 3D Points for Bundle Block Adjustment 899382 Mean Reprojection Error [pixels] 0.179289 Internal Camera Parameters exom_8.0_7152x5368(ex-00-24144) (RGB). Sensor Dimensions: 10.013 [mm] x 7.515 [mm] EXIF ID: exom_8.0_7152x5368 Focal Length Principal Point x Principal Point y R1 R2 R3 T1 T2 Initial Values 5672.979 [pixel] 7.942 [mm] 3576.000 [pixel] 5.006 [mm] 2684.000 [pixel] 3.758 [mm] 0.242-0.643 0.506 0.000 0.001 Optimized Values 5676.646 [pixel] 7.947 [mm] 3589.868 [pixel] 5.026 [mm] 2702.188 [pixel] 3.783 [mm] 0.247-0.667 0.533 0.000 0.000

The number of Automatic Tie Points (ATPs) per pixel averaged over all images of the camera model is color coded between black and white. White indicates that, in average, more than 16 ATPs are extracted at this pixel location. Black indicates that, in average, 0 ATP has been extracted at this pixel location. Click on the image to the see the average direction and magnitude of the reprojection error for each pixel. Note that the vectors are scaled for better visualization. 2D Keypoints Table Number of 2D Keypoints per Image Number of Matched 2D Keypoints per Image Median 39660 20414 Min 20298 2249 Max 72678 33393 Mean 39183 19356 3D Points from 2D Keypoint Matches Number of 3D Points Observed In 2 Images 515118 In 3 Images 163696 In 4 Images 79707 In 5 Images 45810 In 6 Images 28160 In 7 Images 18110 In 8 Images 11808 In 9 Images 8408 In 10 Images 6339 In 11 Images 4861 In 12 Images 3669 In 13 Images 2999 In 14 Images 2261 In 15 Images 1765 In 16 Images 1447 In 17 Images 1079 In 18 Images 858 In 19 Images 716 In 20 Images 563 In 21 Images 396 In 22 Images 367 In 23 Images 290 In 24 Images 260 In 25 Images 223 In 26 Images 152 In 27 Images 120 In 28 Images 75 In 29 Images 54 In 30 Images 32 In 31 Images 18 In 32 Images 7 In 33 Images 12 In 34 Images 1 In 35 Images 1 2D Keypoint Matches

Number of matches 25 222 444 666 888 1111 1333 1555 1777 2000 Figure 5: Top view of the image computed positions with a link between matching images. The darkness of the links indicates the number of matched 2D keypoints between the images. Bright links indicate weak links and require manual tie points or more images. Geolocation Details Absolute Geolocation Variance 0 out of 151 geolocated and calibrated images have been labeled as inaccurate. Min Error [m] Max Error [m] Geolocation Error X [%] Geolocation Error Y [%] Geolocation Error Z [%] - -9.60 0.00 0.00 3.97-9.60-7.68 0.00 0.00 4.64-7.68-5.76 1.32 0.00 8.61-5.76-3.84 4.64 2.65 15.23-3.84-1.92 22.52 7.95 18.54-1.92 0.00 18.54 39.07 11.26 0.00 1.92 35.10 41.06 15.23 1.92 3.84 13.25 9.27 5.96 3.84 5.76 4.64 0.00 3.97 5.76 7.68 0.00 0.00 1.32 7.68 9.60 0.00 0.00 11.26 9.60-0.00 0.00 0.00 Mean [m] -0.140306-0.004822-1.157862 Sigma [m] 2.513917 1.582153 5.080582 RMS Error [m] 2.517829 1.582161 5.210850 Min Error and Max Error represent geolocation error intervals between -1.5 and 1.5 times the maximum accuracy of all the images. Columns X, Y, Z show the percentage of images with geolocation errors within the predefined error intervals. The geolocation error is the difference between the intial and computed image positions. Note that the image geolocation errors do not correspond to the accuracy of the observed 3D points. Relative Geolocation Variance Relative Geolocation Error Images X [%] Images Y [%] Images Z [%] [-1.00, 1.00] 76.82 96.03 60.26 [-2.00, 2.00] 100.00 100.00 84.11 [-3.00, 3.00] 100.00 100.00 95.36 Mean of Geolocation Accuracy [m] 3.293768 3.293768 4.396477 Sigma of Geolocation Accuracy [m] 0.849930 0.849930 1.169825

Images X, Y, Z represent the percentage of images with a relative geolocation error in X, Y, Z. Geolocation Orientational Variance RMS [degree] Omega 34.875906 Phi 41.146388 Kappa 24.394406 Processing Options Geolocation RMS error of the orientation angles given by the difference between the initial and computed image orientation angles. Hardware Operating System Camera Model Name Image Coordinate System Output Coordinate System CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5410 @ 2.33GHz RAM: 32GB GPU: RDPUDD Chained DD (Driver: unknown) Windows Server 2012 R2 Standard, 64-bit exom_8.0_7152x5368(ex-00-24144) (RGB) WGS84 WGS84 / UTM zone 32N (egm96) Keypoints Image Scale Full, Image Scale: 1 Advanced: Matching Image Pairs Advanced: Matching Strategy Advanced: Keypoint Extraction Advanced: Calibration Free Flight or Terrestrial Use Geometrically Verified Matching: no Targeted Number of Keypoints: Automatic Calibration Method: Standard, Internal Parameters Optimization: All, External Parameters Optimization: All, Rematch: Point Cloud Densification details Processing Options Image Scale multiscale, 1/2 (Half image size, Default) Point Density Optimal Minimum Number of Matches 3 3D Textured Mesh Generation, Maximum Number of Triangles: 1000000, Texture Size: 8192x8192 Advanced: Matching Window Size 9x9 pixels Advanced: Image Groups group1 Advanced: Use Densification Area Advanced: Use Annotations Advanced: Limit Camera Depth Automatically Time for Point Cloud Densification 02h:32m:46s Time for 3D Textured Mesh Generation 25m:22s Results Number of Generated Tiles 7 Number of 3D Densified Points 38362882 Average Density (per m 3 ) 4.16029e+06