Lecture 11. LiDAR, RADAR

Similar documents
An Introduction to Lidar & Forestry May 2013

CLASSIFICATION OF NONPHOTOGRAPHIC REMOTE SENSORS

Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR)

Airborne Laser Scanning: Remote Sensing with LiDAR

Course Outline (1) #6 Data Acquisition for Built Environment. Fumio YAMAZAKI

LIDAR an Introduction and Overview

Airborne LiDAR Data Acquisition for Forestry Applications. Mischa Hey WSI (Corvallis, OR)

LIDAR and Terrain Models: In 3D!

Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) Radiohead House of Cards

9/14/2011. Contents. Lecture 3: Spatial Data Acquisition in GIS. Dr. Bo Wu Learning Outcomes. Data Input Stream in GIS

N.J.P.L.S. An Introduction to LiDAR Concepts and Applications

Learning Objectives LIGHT DETECTION AND RANGING. Sensing. Blacksburg, VA July 24 th 30 th, 2010 LiDAR: Mapping the world in 3-D Page 1

Mayden VP of Business Development Surdex Corporation

LiDAR and its use for the enhanced forest inventory

Leica - Airborne Digital Sensors (ADS80, ALS60) Update / News in the context of Remote Sensing applications

Lidar Sensors, Today & Tomorrow. Christian Sevcik RIEGL Laser Measurement Systems

Best practices for generating forest inventory attributes from airborne laser scanning data using the area-based approach

ENY-C2005 Geoinformation in Environmental Modeling Lecture 4b: Laser scanning

LIDAR MAPPING FACT SHEET

LiDAR data pre-processing for Ghanaian forests biomass estimation. Arbonaut, REDD+ Unit, Joensuu, Finland

ALS40 Airborne Laser Scanner

LiForest Software White paper. TRGS, 3070 M St., Merced, 93610, Phone , LiForest

Remote Sensing Sensor Integration

Terrain Modeling and Mapping for Telecom Network Installation Using Scanning Technology. Maziana Muhamad

Chapter 1: Overview. Photogrammetry: Introduction & Applications Photogrammetric tools:

Overview of the Trimble TX5 Laser Scanner

FOR 474: Forest Inventory. Plot Level Metrics: Getting at Canopy Heights. Plot Level Metrics: What is the Point Cloud Anyway?

Terrestrial GPS setup Fundamentals of Airborne LiDAR Systems, Collection and Calibration. JAMIE YOUNG Senior Manager LiDAR Solutions

Investigating the Structural Condition of Individual Trees using LiDAR Metrics

CE 59700: LASER SCANNING

MODELLING FOREST CANOPY USING AIRBORNE LIDAR DATA

Airborne Laser Survey Systems: Technology and Applications

Third Rock from the Sun

Chapters 1 9: Overview

Mapping with laser scanning

LiDAR & Orthophoto Data Report

LiDAR Applications in Surveying and Engineering

Voxelised metrics for forest inventory. Grant Pearse Phenotype Cluster Group Meeting April 2018

UAS based laser scanning for forest inventory and precision farming

The Applanix Approach to GPS/INS Integration

MONITORING COASTAL INSTABILITY USING AIRBORNE AND TERRESTRIAL LIDAR

High resolution survey and orthophoto project of the Dosso-Gaya region in the Republic of Niger. by Tim Leary, Woolpert Inc.

Leica Systems Overview

A QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF AIRBORNE LASER SCANNER DATA

The use of different data sets in 3-D modelling

SIMULATED LIDAR WAVEFORMS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF LIGHT PROPAGATION THROUGH A TREE CANOPY

Introduction Photogrammetry Photos light Gramma drawing Metron measure Basic Definition The art and science of obtaining reliable measurements by mean

Processing LiDAR data: Fusion tutorial

Lecture 5. Relief displacement. Parallax. Monoscopic and stereoscopic height measurement. Photo Project. Soft-copy Photogrammetry.

UTILIZACIÓN DE DATOS LIDAR Y SU INTEGRACIÓN CON SISTEMAS DE INFORMACIÓN GEOGRÁFICA

Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Polarimetry for Wetland Mapping & Change Detection

REMOTE SENSING LiDAR & PHOTOGRAMMETRY 19 May 2017

About LIDAR Data. What Are LIDAR Data? How LIDAR Data Are Collected

Industrial 2D LASER SCANNER LMS-Q120ii

Advanced point cloud processing

Dot-to-dot recent progress in UAS LiDAR: calibration, accuracy assessment, and application

VALIDATION OF A NEW 30 METER GROUND SAMPLED GLOBAL DEM USING ICESAT LIDARA ELEVATION REFERENCE DATA

Terrestrial Laser Scanning: Applications in Civil Engineering Pauline Miller

Using Lidar and ArcGIS to Predict Forest Inventory Variables

Laser scanners with echo digitization for full waveform analysis

Integration of airborne LiDAR and hyperspectral remote sensing data to support the Vegetation Resources Inventory and sustainable forest management

RIEGL LMS-Q780. The Versatile, High Altitude Airborne LIDAR Sensor

EXTRACTING SURFACE FEATURES OF THE NUECES RIVER DELTA USING LIDAR POINTS INTRODUCTION

Using Mobile LiDAR To Efficiently Collect Roadway Asset and Condition Data. Pierre-Paul Grondin, B.Sc. Surveying

QUANTIFICATION OF AVAILABLE SOLAR IRRADIATION ON ROOFTOPS USING ORTHOPHOTOGRAPH AND LIDAR DATA

Data Acquisition; Maintenance, and Dissemination

Introduction to Remote Sensing

James Van Rens CEO Riegl USA, Inc. Mining Industry and UAV s combined with LIDAR Commercial UAV Las Vegas October 2015 James Van Rens CEO Riegl USA

Drones for research - Observing the world in 3D from a LiDAR-UAV

RIEGL VQ 880 G Laser Scanner System for Topo Bathymetric Surveying. IR laser scanner channel OCTOBER 2015

IDENTIFYING STRUCTURAL CHARACTERISTICS OF TREE SPECIES FROM LIDAR DATA

LiDAR Remote Sensing Data Collection: Yaquina and Elk Creek Watershed, Leaf-On Acquisition

RIEGL LMS-Q780. The Versatile, High Altitude Airborne LIDAR Sensor

Mapping Project Report Table of Contents

AIRBORNE GEIGER MODE LIDAR - LATEST ADVANCEMENTS IN REMOTE SENSING APPLICATIONS RANDY RHOADS

APPENDIX E2. Vernal Pool Watershed Mapping

WADDENZEE SPRING SURVEY

Geometry of Aerial photogrammetry. Panu Srestasathiern, PhD. Researcher Geo-Informatics and Space Technology Development Agency (Public Organization)

Measuring the potential impact of offshore mining on coastal instability through integrated time-series laser scanning and photography

Open Pit Mines. Terrestrial LiDAR and UAV Aerial Triangulation for. Figure 1: ILRIS at work

Technical Considerations and Best Practices in Imagery and LiDAR Project Procurement

High Resolution Laserscanning, not only for 3D-City Models

Derivation of Structural Forest Parameters from the Fusion of Airborne Hyperspectral and Laserscanning Data

Aerial and Mobile LiDAR Data Fusion

Lecture 8. Vector Data Analyses. Tomislav Sapic GIS Technologist Faculty of Natural Resources Management Lakehead University

Overview. 1. Aerial LiDAR in Wisconsin (20 minutes) 2. Demonstration of data in CAD (30 minutes) 3. High Density LiDAR (20 minutes)

Development of Methodology to Identify the Areas where Buildings are Broken down by Earthquake using Airborne Laser Technology

Small-footprint full-waveform airborne LiDAR for habitat assessment in the ChangeHabitats2 project

LiDAR data overview. Dr. Keiko Saito Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery (GFDRR)

MODEL DEFORMATION ACCURACY OF DIGITAL FRAME CAMERAS

Multi-temporal LIDAR data for forestry an approach to investigate timber yield changes

Alberta's LiDAR Experience Lessons Learned Cosmin Tansanu

FOR 274: Surfaces from Lidar. Lidar DEMs: Understanding the Returns. Lidar DEMs: Understanding the Returns

Defining Remote Sensing

Orthophotography and LiDAR Terrain Data Collection Rogue River, Oregon Final Report

ICC experiences on Inertial / GPS sensor orientation. A. Baron, W.Kornus, J.Talaya Institut Cartogràfic de Catalunya, ICC

Hamilton County Enhances GIS Base Mapping with 1-foot Contours

Case Study for Long- Range Beyond Visual Line of Sight Project. March 15, 2018 RMEL Transmission and Planning Conference

THE RANGER-UAV FEATURES

Integrated Multi-Source LiDAR and Imagery

Transcription:

NRMT 2270, Photogrammetry/Remote Sensing Lecture 11 Calculating the Number of Photos and Flight Lines in a Photo Project LiDAR, RADAR Tomislav Sapic GIS Technologist Faculty of Natural Resources Management Lakehead University

Scale vs. GSD Ground sampling distance (GSD) of an image states the width of the ground represented by an image cell (pixel). The concept of scale has been traditionally applied to hard copy photos and maps. Because of easy zooming in and out of digital images in a digital, GIS, environment, and because of easy printout enlargement the concept of scale does not fit well digital images -- GSD (spatial resolution) is preferred. Rather than asking At what scale should I fly this digital imagery?, one today asks At what GSD should I fly this digital imagery? But when it comes to calculating the number of photos required to cover an area and the frequency of taking them during the flight so that a targeted end overlap (i.e., ~60%) is achieved, then scale becomes useful again.

Calculate the Number of Photos for a Flight Project Flight project ground area: 7 km * 5.5 km Required sensor scale for the project (enlarged printouts will be later created from the digital image): S = 1 : 42,000 (27.3 cm ground sampling distance (GSD) at 6.5 μm sensor pixel size) Camera CCD sensor: 24 * 35 mm Camera ƒ length: 24 mm linear Flying height: 1008 m Dimension of ground coverage per sensor laterally, G lt : G lt = 42,000 * 0.035 m = 1470 m lateral 24 mm 35 mm Dimension of ground coverage per sensor linearly, G ln : G ln = 42000 * 0.024 m = 1008 m Lateral advance per strip: W = 0.7 * G lt (at 30 percent of side lap) = 0.7 * 1470 m = 1029 m Distance of first and last flight lines inside their respective north and south project boundaries: 1/2 G lt 0.3*G lt = 735 m 441 m = 294 m Number of flight lines = Adjusted spacing between flight lines for integral number of flight lines:

Calculate the Number of Photos for a Flight Project (cont d) Linear advance per sensor (air base): B = 0.4 * G ln = 0.4 * 1008 m = 403.2 m Number of photos per flight line = 7000 m / 403.2 m + 2 + 2 = 21.4 (use 22) Total number of photos: 22 photos per flight line * 6 flight lines = 132 Assuming the aircraft flies at a velocity of 220 km/h, the intervalometer (a device that counts intervals on time on the camera) setting necessary to obtain the desired end lap is: Intervalometer setting =

1/2G lt = 735 m 0.3G lt = 441 m 294 m Project boundary 1 5.5 km 7 km 2 3 4 982 m 294 m 5 6 0.3G lt = 441 m Limits of coverage

Active Remote Sensing Systems Photo cameras are passive remote sensing systems the recorded energy is produced by the sun and captured by the remote sensing system (camera). As opposed to passive remote sensing systems, active remote sensing systems both produce (emit) and record energy. Two of such systems are LiDAR, which is rapidly and increasingly applied in forest and natural resources related sciences and economical sectors, and RADAR, which is applied to a lesser degree.

LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) LiDAR sensor emits energy in the form of a laser pulse and measures the time it takes for the energy to be reflected back to the sensor. Range (m) = (Speed of Light x Time of Flight)/ 2 If we know the position and orientation of the sensor we can also calculate the x,y,z position of the reflecting (intercepting) object. LiDAR sensors can be aerial (Aerial Laser Sensor) or terrestrial (TLS). An ALS system includes an opto-mechanical scanner; control, monitoring, and recording units; a GPS; and an IMU. The opto-mechanical scanner moves the laser across the flight pat, within a user-specified angle (corresponds to aerial photo camera s Field of View). Source: White et al. (2013)

LiDAR ALS systems used for forest inventory purposes typically emit laser pulses at nearnadir incidence angles (<25 ) and with high pulse repetition frequencies (50-200 khz). The laser pulses are: very short (3-10 ns) narrow-beam width (0.15-2.0 mrad) infrared (0.8 1.55 µm) In general, at flying heights of ~ 500-3000 m, ALS systems generate 0.5 20 pulses/m 2 with a small ground footprint of < 1 m. Source: White et al. (2013)

LiDAR In terms of the recording of the returns of the emitted energy, there are two types of ALS systems, discrete and full waveform. Discrete return systems convert returned portions (groups of photons!) of the emitted waveform energy into positions (points, targets) referenced in time (first, second, last) as up to five returns are recorded. Full waveform ALS systems record the reflected energy from a each pulse as a single, continuous signal. Lower spatial resolution but more detailed information on vertical structure is captured and the true ground is more accurately detected (US Forest Service (2016)) Discrete return systems are more commonly used in forest inventory. White et al. (2013) Source: www.nrcs.usda.gov Source: www.e-education.psu.edu

LiDAR Returns in a discrete ALS system become points with x,y,z coordinates that can be displayed in a 3D space, together or separately. Aboveground heights for the points are calculated by determining the height of the ground (lowest last and single returns) and subtracting it from the points heights. Source: Woods (2015)

ALS data are used to: LiDAR Measure tree height, tree density, stand basal area, forest biomass, forest volume. Measure and describe forest structure. Estimate wood fuel volumes. Create DEMs Source: White et al. (2013) Source: Treitz et al. (2016)

LiDAR Forest volume estimates can be done by combining ALS metrics (e.g., mean height, standard deviation of heights, height deciles, maximum height, density), field data measurements and FRI. Source: White et al. (2013)

LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) Terrestrial LiDAR Used to measure forest structure, crown and branch size, trunk taper, etc. FPInnovations: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=- VmAy6rxt-U

RADAR (Radio Detection And Ranging) Similar to LiDAR, in a radar system, the transmitter generates short pulses of energy, in this case microwave (from just under a mm to 1 m em wavelength), at regular intervals which are focused by the antenna into a beam. The radar beams are sent at an oblique angle and the receiver antenna receives a portion of the transmitted energy reflected (backscattered echo ). By measuring the time delay between the transmission and reception the distance range to the objects is calculated. NRC (2016). Source: NRC (2016) Some of the major applications of radar are: Forest structure measurement. Flood and wetland mapping. Soil moisture mapping. Ice structure and type. NRC (2016). An advantage of radar compared to LiDAR and aerial photography, is that radar beams pass through clouds because of the relatively long em waves.

References: Natural Resources Canada (NRC). 2016. Radar Basics. http://www.nrcan.gc.ca/earth-sciences/geomatics/satelliteimagery-air-photos/satellite-imagery-products/educational-resources/9355 NRC (2016). Viewed March 2016. Treitz P., M. Woods, K. Lim, V. Thomas, H. McCaughey. 2016. LiDAR remote sensing for natural resource management. http://www.queensu.ca/sbc/images/presentations/treitz_p.pdf Viewed March 2016. US Forest Service. 2016. Introduction to LiDAR. http://www.fs.fed.us/eng/rsac/lidar_training/introduction_to_lidar/player.html. Viewed March 2016. White, J. C., M. A. Wulder, A. Varhola, M. Vastaranta, N. C. Coops, B. D. Cook, D. Pitt, and M. Woods. 2013. A best practices guide for generating forest inventory attributes from airborne laser scanning data using an area-based approach. Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Canadian Wood Fibre Centre. Woods, M. 2015. Introduction to cloud points. Developing area-based forest inventories using LiDAR or photogrammetric point clouds and the LTK software workshop. Thunder Bay, Nov 25, 2015.