Network Working Group. Category: Informational January 2006

Similar documents
Network Working Group Internet-Draft October 27, 2007 Intended status: Experimental Expires: April 29, 2008

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 4424 February 2006 Updates: 4348 Category: Standards Track

Network Working Group. Category: Standards Track August Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6) Relay Agent Remote-ID Option

Network Working Group. Category: Standards Track June Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6) Relay Agent Subscriber-ID Option

Category: Standards Track June Requesting Attributes by Object Class in the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) Status of This Memo

Category: Standards Track October 2006

Category: Standards Track June 2006

Category: Standards Track September MIB Textual Conventions for Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs)

Request for Comments: 4393 Category: Standards Track March MIME Type Registrations for 3GPP2 Multimedia Files

Expires: October 9, 2005 April 7, 2005

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 3937 Category: Informational October 2004

Request for Comments: 4329 April 2006 Category: Informational

Network Working Group Internet-Draft August 2005 Expires: February 2, Atom Link No Follow draft-snell-atompub-feed-nofollow-00.

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 4573 Category: Standard Track July MIME Type Registration for RTP Payload Format for H.

Request for Comments: 5179 Category: Standards Track May 2008

Category: Standards Track December 2007

Category: Informational October Common Format and MIME Type for Comma-Separated Values (CSV) Files

Network Working Group. Intended status: Standards Track Columbia U. Expires: March 5, 2009 September 1, 2008

Network Working Group Internet-Draft January 25, 2006 Expires: July 29, Feed Rank draft-snell-atompub-feed-index-05.txt. Status of this Memo

Request for Comments: May 2007

Network Working Group Request for Comments: August Address-Prefix-Based Outbound Route Filter for BGP-4

Request for Comments: 5010 Category: Standards Track Cisco Systems, Inc. September 2007

Request for Comments: 4633 Category: Experimental August 2006

Updates: 2409 May 2005 Category: Standards Track. Algorithms for Internet Key Exchange version 1 (IKEv1)

Network Working Group. Category: Informational April A Uniform Resource Name (URN) Namespace for the Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC)

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 4143 Category: Standards Track Brandenburg November 2005

Request for Comments: 4680 Updates: 4346 September 2006 Category: Standards Track

Network Working Group Internet-Draft August 2005 Expires: February 2, Atom Link No Follow draft-snell-atompub-feed-nofollow-03.

Network Working Group. Category: Standards Track Cisco Systems May 2007

Network Working Group. Category: Informational May OSPF Database Exchange Summary List Optimization

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 4603 Category: Informational Cisco Systems July Additional Values for the NAS-Port-Type Attribute

Category: Standards Track Cisco Systems, Inc January The Secure Shell (SSH) Session Channel Break Extension

Category: Standards Track Cisco Systems, Inc. March 2005

Request for Comments: 3934 Updates: 2418 October 2004 BCP: 94 Category: Best Current Practice

Request for Comments: 3932 October 2004 BCP: 92 Updates: 3710, 2026 Category: Best Current Practice

Category: Experimental June 2006

Network Working Group. Category: Standards Track June 2005

Category: Standards Track October Vendor-Identifying Vendor Options for Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol version 4 (DHCPv4)

Network Working Group. Category: Informational October 2005

Network Working Group. Category: Standards Track Juniper Networks August 2008

Category: Standards Track Cisco H. Tschofenig Nokia Siemens Networks August 2008

Network Working Group. Category: Standards Track July 2007

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 4913 Category: Experimental July 2007

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 4869 Category: Informational May Suite B Cryptographic Suites for IPsec. Status of This Memo

Network Working Group. February 2005

Network Working Group Request for Comments: A. Zinin Alcatel-Lucent March 2007

Request for Comments: 4759 Category: Standards Track Neustar Inc. L. Conroy Roke Manor Research November 2006

Network Working Group Request for Comments: Cisco Systems, Inc. December 2005

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 4242 Category: Standards Track University of Southampton B. Volz Cisco Systems, Inc.

Network Working Group. Cisco Systems June 2007

Request for Comments: Category: Standards Track January 2008

vcard Extensions for Instant Messaging (IM)

Request for Comments: 3861 Category: Standards Track August 2004

C. Martin ipath Services February A Policy Control Mechanism in IS-IS Using Administrative Tags

Request for Comments: 5208 Category: Informational May 2008

Obsoletes: 2070, 1980, 1942, 1867, 1866 Category: Informational June 2000

Jabber, Inc. August 20, 2004

Request for Comments: K. Norrman Ericsson June 2006

September The Internet Assigned Number Authority (IANA) tel Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) Parameter Registry. Status of This Memo

Category: Standards Track October 2006

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 5138 Category: Informational February 2008

Request for Comments: 3968 Updates: 3427 December 2004 BCP: 98 Category: Best Current Practice

February T11 Network Address Authority (NAA) Naming Format for iscsi Node Names

Network Working Group Request for Comments: Cisco Systems, Inc. June 2006

Intended status: Standards Track August 15, 2008 Expires: February 16, 2009

Expires in six months 24 October 2004 Obsoletes: RFC , , 3377, 3771

Network Working Group. Juniper Networks January Maximum Transmission Unit Signalling Extensions for the Label Distribution Protocol

Category: Best Current Practice February Early IANA Allocation of Standards Track Code Points

Request for Comments: 5079 Category: Standards Track December Rejecting Anonymous Requests in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)

Network Working Group. N. Williams Sun Microsystems June 2006

Network Working Group Request for Comments: February 2006

Network Working Group. Updates: 3463, 4468, 4954 June 2008 Category: Best Current Practice. A Registry for SMTP Enhanced Mail System Status Codes

Request for Comments: January 2007

Network Working Group. Category: Standards Track Cisco Systems, Inc. April 2004

Request for Comments: 4255 Category: Standards Track SPARTA January Using DNS to Securely Publish Secure Shell (SSH) Key Fingerprints

Category: Standards Track May Transport Layer Security Protocol Compression Methods

Request for Comments: 4142 Category: Standards Track Nine by Nine November 2005

Category: Experimental April BinaryTime: An Alternate Format for Representing Date and Time in ASN.1

Category: Standards Track March Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) Transport Over TCP

Network Working Group. J. Lee Samsung Electronics T. Iwata Nagoya University August 2006

Network Working Group. February Media Gateway Control Protocol (MGCP) Redirect and Reset Package

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 4558 Category: Standards Track Cisco Systems D. Papadimitriou Alcatel June 2006

Network Working Group. M. Duckett T. Anschutz BellSouth J. Moisand Juniper Networks September 2006

Mounting Web Distributed Authoring and Versioning (WebDAV) Servers

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 4432 March 2006 Category: Standards Track

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 5235 January 2008 Obsoletes: 3685 Category: Standards Track

Isode Limited March 2008

Request for Comments: 4571 Category: Standards Track July 2006

Network Working Group. Category: Standards Track Samsung S. Kumar Tech Mahindra Ltd S. Madanapalli Samsung May 2008

Category: Informational Woven Systems May 2008

Network Working Group Request for Comments: A. Zinin Alcatel-Lucent March OSPF Out-of-Band Link State Database (LSDB) Resynchronization

Network Working Group Request for Comments: December 2004

Network Working Group. BCP: 131 July 2007 Category: Best Current Practice

Request for Comments: 3764 Category: Standards Track April enumservice registration for Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Addresses-of-Record

Network Working Group Request for Comments: September IANA Considerations for the IPv4 and IPv6 Router Alert Options

Request for Comments: 4509 Category: Standards Track May Use of SHA-256 in DNSSEC Delegation Signer (DS) Resource Records (RRs)

Ericsson D. Willis. Cisco Systems. April 2006

Request for Comments: 4715 Category: Informational NTT November 2006

Request for Comments: 3905 Category: Informational September A Template for IETF Patent Disclosures and Licensing Declarations

Request for Comments: 5156 Category: Informational April 2008

Transcription:

Network Working Group G. McCobb Request for Comments: 4374 IBM Corporation Category: Informational January 2006 Status of This Memo The application/xv+xml Media Type This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. Copyright Notice Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006). Abstract This document describes the registration of the MIME sub-type application/xv+xml. This sub-type is intended for use as a media descriptor for XHTML+Voice multimodal language documents. 1. Introduction XHTML+Voice is a member of the XHTML family of document types, as specified by XHTML Modularization [4]. XHTML+Voice extends XHTML 1.1 [5] with a modularized subset of VoiceXML 2.0 [9], XML Events [7], and a few extensions to both XHTML and VoiceXML 2.0. XHTML 1.1, VoiceXML 2.0, and XML Events are W3C Recommendations. The language integration defined by XHTML+Voice supports all modules defined by XHTML Modularization and adds voice interaction to XHTML elements in order to enable multimodal applications. The defined document type for XHTML+Voice is XHTML Host language document type conformant. XHTML+Voice 1.2 [8] is maintained by the VoiceXML Forum, at URI location <http://www.voicexml.org/specs/multimodal/x+v/12/>. 1.1. application/xv+xml Usage The application/xv+xml media type is intended to be a media descriptor for XHTML+Voice multimodal documents. It is used to inform applications that additional markup for running a voice browser component and activating handlers for DOM Level 2 events [6] via XML Events [7] can be processed. McCobb Informational [Page 1]

This media type registration is not intended for e-mail usage. 2. IANA Registration To: ietf-types@iana.org Subject: Registration of MIME media type application/xv+xml MIME media type name: application MIME subtype name: xv+xml Required parameters: none Optional parameters: charset: has the same semantics as the charset parameter of the "application/xml" media type specified in [1]. Encoding considerations: XHTML+Voice has the same media type encoding considerations specified in Section 3.2 of [1]. Security considerations: XHTML+Voice is an extension of XHTML and has the same security issues as XHTML. These include interpreting anchors and forms in XHTML documents, and scripting languages and other dynamic interactive capabilities. See Section 7 of [2]. In addition, the scripting language can be accessed by both the XHTML and the VoiceXML 2.0 markup embedded in the XHTML+Voice document. See Section 1.3.1.5 of [8]. XML-Events [7] allows an author to attach a handler to any node in the document. The handler that is activated in response to a specified event may be either a voice dialog or a script that can be in either the same or an external document. Interoperability considerations: Because XHTML+Voice is built upon W3C standard recommendations, it is designed to be interoperable across a wide range of platforms and client devices. Because the extensions to XHTML are identified by their namespaces, all browsers that have namespace support can run an XHTML+Voice document as an XHTML document without voice interaction. Published specification: The latest published version of XHTML+Voice is [8]. McCobb Informational [Page 2]

Applications which use this media type: XHTML+Voice documents are intended to be deployed on the World Wide Web and rendered by multimodal browsers that support the visual and voice modes of interaction. Because XHTML+Voice is an application of XML, authors can expect XHTML+Voice user agents to be conformant XML 1.0 [3] processors. See section 2 of [2]. Additional information: Magic number(s): There is no single string that is always present. File extension(s): mxml, xhvml, xvml, xvm Macintosh File Type Code(s): TEXT Person & e-mail address to contact for further information: Gerald McCobb mccobb@us.ibm.com Intended usage: LIMITED USE Author/Change controller: Gerald McCobb Further information: 3. Fragment Identifiers See Section 3 of [2]. Following [2], fragment identifiers for XHTML+ Voice documents designate the element with the corresponding ID attribute value (see [3], Section 3.3.1). While XHTML+Voice adds new ID attributes with fragment identifier namespaces that are not in the same namespace as XHTML, uniqueness of the ID attribute values is preserved within the document. See sections 1.3.1 and 5.3 of [8]. 4. Recognizing XHTML+Voice files Because XHTML+Voice is XML, an XHTML+Voice document (optionally) starts with an XML declaration that begins with "<?xml" and has a DOCTYPE declaration "<!DOCTYPE html". XHTML+Voice 1.2 has the following DOCTYPE declaration: <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//VoiceXML Forum//DTD XHTML+Voice 1.2//EN" "http://www.voicexml.org/specs/multimodal/x+v/12/dtd/xhtml+voice12.dtd"> Because XHTML+Voice is in the XHTML family of languages, the root element of an XHTML+Voice document is html, and <html can be found near the top of the document. McCobb Informational [Page 3]

5. Security Considerations Security considerations for this media type are discussed in the MIME type registration that appears in Section 2. 6. IANA Considerations As described in Section 2, this document specifies the registration of a MIME type for XHTML+Voice documents according to [1]. 7. Normative References [1] Murata, M., St. Laurent, S., and D. Kohn, "XML Media Types", RFC 3023, January 2001. [2] Baker, M. and P. Stark, "The application/xhtml+xml Media Type", RFC 3236, January 2002. [3] Bray, T. and others, "Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0", W3C Recommendation, http://www.w3.org/tr/rec-xml", February 2004. [4] Dooley, S. and others, "Modularization of XHTML", W3C Recommendation, http://www.w3.org/tr/xhtml-modularization", April 2001. [5] Altheim, M. and S. McCarron, "XHTML 1.1 - Module-based XHTML", W3C Recommendation, http://www.w3.org/tr/xhtml11/, May 2001. [6] Pixley, T., "Document Object Model Level 2 Events Specification", W3C Recommendation, http://www.w3.org/tr/dom-level-2-events/, November 2000. [7] Pemberton, S., Raman, T., and S. McCarron, "XML Events - An events syntax for XML", W3C Recommendation, http://www.w3.org/tr/xml-events/, January 2002. [8] Axelsson, J. and others, "XHTML+Voice Profile 1.2", http://www.voicexml.org/specs/multimodal/x+v/12/, March 2004. [9] McGlashan, S. and others, "Voice Extensible Markup Language (VoiceXML)", W3C Recommendation, http://www.w3.org/tr/voicexml20/, March 2004. McCobb Informational [Page 4]

Author s Address Gerald McCobb International Business Machines Corporation 8051 Congress Ave. Boca Raton, FL 33487 USA Phone: +1 561 862 2109 EMail: mccobb@us.ibm.com McCobb Informational [Page 5]

Full Copyright Statement Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006). This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights. This document and the information contained herein are provided on an "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Intellectual Property The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in this document or the extent to which any license under such rights might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be found in BCP 78 and BCP 79. Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at http://www.ietf.org/ipr. The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at ietf-ipr@ietf.org. Acknowledgement Funding for the RFC Editor function is provided by the IETF Administrative Support Activity (IASA). McCobb Informational [Page 6]