Standard operating procedure

Similar documents
Lead Author Approver Effective Date: 13-MAR-13 Name: Ana Rodriguez Sanchez Review Date: 13-MAR-16

Standard operating procedure

Work instructions. 1. Changes since last revision. 2. Records. 3. Instructions. Documents needed for this WIN

Standard operating procedure

Standard operating procedure

Standard operating procedure

Standard operating procedure

Standard operating procedure

Standard operating procedure

All the documents related to the EU-RMP Annex 1 activities are stored at the following locations:

All external requests for access to information as well as their responses are entered into the Queries database.

The WIN applies to the Vet Applications team in the Veterinary Regulatory and Organisational Support service (V-VM-ROS).

Title: Handling of Art. 29(1) referrals to the CMDh (60 day procedure) by the CMDh secretariat (incl. Article 13 referrals for variations)

Applies to: SA Administrative Assistant, SAWP Scientific Secretary and SA secretarial team in Scientific Advice Section

VARIATION FILING PROCEDURE IN EUROPE: A COMPLETE REVIEW

This is the production release of the second iteration of EudraCT 8.1. It includes the following main functional changes:

Standard operating procedure

COMMITTEE FOR PROPRIETARY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS (CPMP) GUIDELINE ON REQUIREMENTS FOR PLASMA MASTER FILE (PMF) CERTIFICATION

Multinational assessment teams

Title: Key activities when screening the electronic Reaction Monitoring Reports (ermrs) for new signals

Standard Operating Procedure. SOP full title: Sponsor processes for reporting Suspected Unexpected Serious Adverse Reactions

BEST PRACTICE GUIDE for The classification of unforeseen variations

EUROPEAN MEDICINES AGENCY (EMA) CONSULTATION

Standard operating procedure

esubmissions Web UI Release Notes

esubmission Gateway and Web Client Training on the use of XML delivery files for Veterinary submissions

esubmissions Web UI Release Notes

PSUR Repository and the EU single assessment

EudraVigilance Components & Functionality Introduction

User Guidance for submissions via esubmission Gateway / Web Client using xml delivery files

PSUR Repository Implementation Plan

Process description for managing duplicates in the context of the Medical Literature Monitoring (MLM) service

European Aviation Safety Agency

ENCePP Code of Conduct Implementation Guidance for Sharing of ENCePP Study Data

On-boarding of users to SPOR data services

Management of RMP for CAPs in postauthorisation

SUBMISSION OF COMMENTS ON Guideline on Real Time Release Testing (formerly Guideline on Parametric Release) Draft

European Medicines Agency Standard Operating Procedure

Vaccine data collection tool Oct Functions, Indicators & Sub-Indicators

EMA Common Repository: Questions and answers relating to practical and technical aspects of the implementation

NEWCASTLE CLINICAL TRIALS UNIT STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

SUBMISSION OF COMMENTS ON

Release Notes for TIGes ectd Guidance Comparison of version 2.0 with 1.0

Comments received from public consultation on good pharmacovigilance practices (GVP)

Mock-ups checklist - Guidance for checking mock-ups

Guidance for the format and content of the final study report of non-interventional post-authorisation safety studies

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

Guidance for submission and validation of electronic declaration of interests and electronic curriculum vitae

extended EudraVigilance Medicinal Product Dictionary (XEVMPD) e-learning

Version Control of Study Specific Documents

CMD(v)/BPG/006. BEST PRACTICE GUIDE For. Type II Variations. Edition 00. Edition date:

IRIS Quick guide to registration

User Guidance for National Competent Authorities for PSUR Repository

Chapter 5: Extended EudraVigilance Product Report Acknowledgement Message

3 September

EMA procedural updates

Cover note on XEVMPD substance controlled vocabulary following the quality control exercise

Request for Feedback. Manizhe Payton, MPH. Director Office of Clinical Site Oversight Division of AIDS February 22, 2017

LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY RESEARCH OFFICE STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE. Loughborough University (LU) Research Office SOP 1027 LU

Substance, Product, Organisation and Referential (SPOR) communication update

How to send submissions via the Web Client

Welcome to the portal. We are very pleased for your interest in our vacancies.

Keele Clinical Trials Unit

ICH Topic M 4 Common Technical Document for the Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use Organisation CTD. Step 5

IRIS Quick guide to the portal for Orphan Industry users

Isabella Marta, Head of Marketing Authorization Department Italian Medicines Agency

esubmission Gateway Web Client

Date: May 19, Dear Dr. Domingo,

ISO : Competence Requirements Clause 7

Measures for Article 57 Data Quality Assurance

User guide on how to generate PDF versions of the product information - veterinary

NEWCASTLE CLINICAL TRIALS UNIT STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE SOP 815. Clinical Data Management System LOCKING AND UNLOCKING THE DATABASE. Joint Research Office

EudraVigilance Release Notes v.1.13

Citrix Remote Access

SOP-QA-32 V2. Document History Version Description of update Date Effective 1 Change of number for Q-Pulse

BEST PRACTICE GUIDE for Type IB Variations. CMD(v)/BPG/005. Edition 00. Edition date: Implementation date:

Rev 2 May Health and Safety Authority. Function and Scope of REACH and CLP Helpdesk

Pre-notification check for type IB Variations 1

Topics Raised by EFPIA. Webinar on Policy Jun 2017, FINAL. Presentation

Variations in ectd format Q&A document

EudraCT release notes

Issues that Matter Notification and Escalation

IVDR Breakout. Copyright 2017 BSI. All rights reserved.

MEDICAL DEVICES REGULATIONS 2002: REGULATIONS 19 and 30 FORM RG2

PMS Iteration 1: analysis of the data efforts & value results and recommendation on the scope

EMA esubmission Gateway and Web Client: Questions and answers on Veterinary Applications

The Role of the QP in MA Compliance

Change Control Process for European ectd Standards Version 1.1. December 2006

Report of the Working Group on mhealth Assessment Guidelines February 2016 March 2017

RMS & OMS Industry on-boarding to SPOR Webinar with Industry Change Liaisons

1. STRATEGIC PLANNING

BEST PRACTICE GUIDE. For Type IB Variations. CMDv/BPG/005 Edition 05. Edition date: 10 April 2015

Annex IX: E-SUBMISSION THROUGH THE COMMON EUROPEAN PORTAL (CESP)

Regulating Cyber: the UK s plans for the NIS Directive

September 2015 Ginas Meeting Highlights

Session 4. Workshop on the implementation of ISO standard for ICSRs. Testing with EMA new process

Dated 3 rd of November 2017 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING SIERRA LEONE NATIONAL ehealth COORDINATION HUB

CDISC in Europe. CDISC Interchange Japan, Tokyo, July 20, 2010

Common Protocol Template (CPT) Frequently Asked Questions

Transcription:

Standard operating procedure Title: Procedure for liaising between the EMA, the CHMP and the CTFG on the potential CHMP negative opinion, pre-opinion or post-authorisation withdrawal, suspension or revocation of a Marketing Authorisation with impact on EU clinical trials Status: PUBLIC Document no.: SOP/INSP/2033 Lead author Approver Effective date: 29-FEB-12 Name: Ana Rodriguez Sanchez Name: Fergus Sweeney Review date: 28-FEB-15 Beato Signature: On file Signature: On file Supersedes: n/a Date: 24-FEB-12 Date: 24-FEB-12 TrackWise record no.: 3209 1. Purpose Early dialogue between the Agency/CHMP (Co)-Rapporteurs/ Clinical Trials Facilitation Group (CTFG)/National Competent Authorities (NCA) is essential in case CHMP/(Co)-Rapporteurs identify safety issues or lack of efficacy that could lead to a regulatory action with potential impact on any ongoing/completed/future clinical trials. These safety or lack of efficacy issues may be identified during the initial evaluation and could lead to a negative opinion or a withdrawal of a Marketing Authorization Application (MAA) or can be identified in the post-authorisation phase and lead to referral opinion, a suspension, revocation or withdrawal of a Marketing Authorization (MA), urgent safety restrictions or a negative opinion or a withdrawal for a variation or line extension This dialogue should be maintained throughout the scientific review process through the Agency and its scientific committees up to the finalisation of the CHMP opinion and beyond (e.g. to address the complete removal of the medicinal product from the market or the lifting of the suspension of the marketing authorisation). A procedure is therefore needed on the way to communicate between the Agency, the CHMP/Pharmacovigilance Working Party (PhVWP) and the CTFG/NCA and to clarify the scope, the roles and responsibilities of the people involved, the means to communicate, the nature of the information to be communicated and the steps to be taken to facilitate this communication. 7 Westferry Circus Canary Wharf London E14 4HB United Kingdom Telephone +44 (0)20 7418 8400 Facsimile +44 (0)20 7418 8416 E-mail info@ema.europa.eu Website www.ema.europa.eu An agency of the European Union European Medicines Agency, 2012. Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged.

2. Scope This procedure covers the communication between the Agency, the CHMP/PhVWP and the CTFG in the context of the centralised procedure or a referral during the following situations and when an impact on EU clinical trials is envisaged due to safety issues or lack of efficacy: Negative opinion or pre-opinion withdrawal of a MAA Negative opinion or pre-opinion withdrawal for a variation or line extension of a MA Suspension of a MA or lifting of a suspension of a MA Revocation of a MA Withdrawal of a MA Urgent Safety Restrictions As consequence of these types of outcomes or regulatory actions, the CTFG/NCAs involved in the authorisation of clinical trials with the medicinal product/active substance concerned, may decide on the suspension, premature ending, modification of ongoing clinical trials, or preclude any new clinical trials from commencing. Issues related to the quality of the Investigational Medicinal Product falls under the Quality Defects Procedure and therefore outside of the scope of this procedure. 3. Responsibilities The responsibility for the execution of a particular part of this procedure is identified in the right-hand column of section 9. The main key players to ensure that this procedure is adhered to are the PTMs in the P-CI-CNC section, the PTLs handling the procedure (H-SE and H-QM for centralised procedures and P-R-CP for referrals and Article 20 procedures) and the P-MI-PIN SH in the medical information sector. 4. Changes since last revision New SOP. 5. Documents needed for this SOP N/A 6. Related documents SOP/H/3193 Master Files for referrals SOP/PDM/1004 Core master files of medicinal products for human and veterinary use following the centralised procedure SOP/H/3052 Urgent Safety Restrictions 7. Definitions CHMP Committee for Medicinal Products of Human Use CT Clinical trials SOP/INSP/2033, 29-FEB-12 Page 2/6

CTFG Clinical Trials Facilitation Group EudraCT EU database on clinical trials H-QM Quality of Medicines Sector in the Human Medicines Development and Evaluation Unit H-SE Safety and Efficacy of Medicines Sector in the Human Medicines Development and Evaluation Unit MA Marketing authorisation MAA Marketing authorisation application NCA National Competent Authority P-CI-CNC Clinical and Non-clinical Compliance Section in the Patient Health Protection Unit PhVWP Pharmacovigilance Working Party P-MI-PIN Public Information and Stakeholders Networking Section in the Medical InformationSector PTL Product team leader handling the procedure (which leads to negative opinion, preopinion or post-authorisation withdrawal, suspension or revocation of a MA) PTM Product team member P-R-CP Community Procedures Section in the Patient Health Protection Unit SH Section Head SOP/INSP/2033, 29-FEB-12 Page 3/6

8. Process map(s)/ flow chart(s) START 1. Inform and provide any background information to the [and cc the GCP mailbox] from the first moment the PTL is aware of a discussion on a potential regulatory action. 2. Are timelines for the actions to be taken very short? yes 2.1 Inform the CTFG as soon as possible via the CTFG mailbox. no 3. Invite the P-CI-CNC PTM responsible to the relevant discussions. 4. Does the CTFG chair or vice-chair confirm the need of a teleconference? no yes 5. Prepare and circulate draft agenda for teleconference. 6. Support CTFG chair and vice-chair to arrange teleconference with NCAs concerned. 7. Circulate any Press Release and Q&A document. 8. Post Press Release and Q&A document to CTFG mailbox. 9. Inform about lifted suspension. 10. Post information to CTFG mailbox END SOP/INSP/2033, 29-FEB-12 Page 4/6

9. Procedure Step Action Responsibility 1 Inform and provide any background information to the P-CI-CNC PTM [and cc the GCP mailbox (GCP@ema.europa.eu)] from the first moment the PTL is aware of a discussion on a potential regulatory action, as indicated below, due to safety issues or lack of efficacy: PTL Negative opinion or pre-opinion withdrawal of a MAA Negative opinion or pre-opinion withdrawal for a variation or line extension of a MA Suspension of a MA or lifting of a suspension of a MA Revocation of a marketing authorisation Withdrawal of a marketing authorisation Urgent Safety Restrictions 2 Discuss the issue with the PTL /PTM-S/E for centralised procedures or P-R-CP PTL for referrals in order to have better understanding of the potential impact on EU clinical trials, the information to be requested to the MAH/applicant (e.g. list of their clinical trials ongoing, actions taken with respect to clinical trials and the communication to the NCAs concerned) and on the timelines for the actions to be taken in order to decide on the communication strategy to be followed: If the timelines the actions to be taken are expected to be very short (e.g. few days) or there is an urgency for immediate notification for serious safety reasons, proceed with step 2.1 If longer timelines are expected, because more discussion within the CHMP and/or with experts groups is recommended, proceed with step 3 2.1 Inform the CTFG as soon as possible via the CTFG mailbox (AllHumanCTFG@ema.europa.eu) and copy the PTL, P-MI-PIN SH Rapporteurs and GCP mailbox (GCP@ema.europa.eu). Include in that communication a report from EudraCT with the information on the clinical trials (commercial and non-commercial) ongoing with the product used as a test or comparator in order to estimate the impact that the regulatory action decided might have on the clinical trials running in the EU in conjunction with any additional background information provided by the PTL. Then continue from step 6 or 7, as applicable. 3 Invite the responsible for that product to the relevant discussions held before the CHMP decides on the actions to be taken for its further communication to the CTFG. PTL SOP/INSP/2033, 29-FEB-12 Page 5/6

Step Action Responsibility 4 Inform the CTFG chair and vice-chair about the matter of concern (including the EudraCT report mentioned in step 2.1) and discuss with them the need or not to set up a teleconference involving the Rapporteurs, the PTL, the and other relevant people, as appropriate. If T-con is required, go to step 5 If T-con is not required, communicate to the CTFG as indicated in step 2.1. 5 Prepare and circulate to all parties involved in the teleconference a draft agenda which shall cover, among others topics, the following: Update on the case and CHMP/PhVWP discussions Impact on ongoing clinical trials Communication to Member States & sponsors Advice to investigators on patient discontinuation and treatment follow-up Need for additional clinical data Agreement on further communications (i.e. T-con as step 5 or via CTFG mailbox as step 2.1, as needed) 6 Support the CTFG in arranging further teleconference(s), for the chairman and vice-chairman to discuss the case directly with the NCAs concerned, for their decision making process on the actions to be taken with respect to the clinical trials ongoing at Member State level. P-CI CNC secretary 7 Provide to the any Press Release and Questions & Answers (Q&A) document about the case of concern. P-MI-PIN SH 8 Post the information provided in step 7 in the CTFG mailbox (AllHumanCTFG@ema.europa.eu) for information and cc GCP mailbox (GCP@ema.europa.eu). 9 Inform the when a suspension of a MAA is lifted. PTL 10 Post that information in the CTFG mailbox (AllHumanCTFG@ema.europa.eu) and cc GCP mailbox (GCP@ema.europa.eu). PC-I-CNC PTM 10. Records The product mailbox will be copied in all correspondence reflecting this communication to ensure that records of these exchanges are maintained. Product related information will be saved in the respective product folder/referral folder in DREAM as normal practice. SOP/INSP/2033, 29-FEB-12 Page 6/6