Access network systems for future mobile backhaul networks

Similar documents
Visionary Technology Presentations

Examining the Fronthaul Network Segment on the 5G Road Why Hybrid Optical WDM Access and Wireless Technologies are required?

The path toward C-RAN and V-RAN: benefits and challenges from operator perspective

Phase Synchronisation the standards and beyond

Timing & Synchronization in Wireless Infrastructure

Connected World. Connected Experiences. Fronthaul Technologies in vran

Front-Haul challenges for future radio access

5G: an IP Engineer Perspective

Examining The C-RAN Business Case For Mobile Operators. RAN & Backhaul Networks, Berlin May 20, 2015

Towards 5G RAN Virtualization Enabled by Intel and ASTRI*

INTRODUCING THE 5G-PPP 5G-XHAUL PROJECT

The Impact of 5G Air Interfaces on Converged Fronthaul/Backhaul. Jens Bartelt TU Dresden / 5G-XHaul

Synchronous Ethernet based mobile backhaul integrated transport and synchronization management

Challenges in Data-Center Technologies for Distributed Radio Signal Processing. Raymond Knopp EURECOM, Communication Systems Department

ITSF 2007 overview of future sync applications and architecture challenges

Fronthaul architecture towards 5G

ITSF - TIMING FOR 5G SYNCHRONISATION REQUIREMENTS FOR 5G

Optical Solutions for 4G LTE Networks and Beyond

China Mobile s View on Next Generation Fronthaul Interface

NETWORK SYNCHRONIZATION TRAINING COURSE

Planning for time - deploying Telecoms Boundary Clocks

Double Migration of Packet Clocks

Testing Timing Over Packet With The Ixia Anue 3500

Time Sync distribution via PTP

xran and C-RAN Integration in M-CORD

Heterogeneous Mobile Network

G Telecom Profile

EPoC System Level Synchronization Transport 802.3bn Interim meeting - Phoenix

Tales from the Base Station to the Substation. Delivering Phase ITSF 2013

ITU-T. Technical Report GSTR-TN5G. Transport network support of IMT-2020/5G. (9 February 2018)

NG Fronthaul Network Requirements and Architecture. Tony Tam Fujitsu Network Communications Peter K. Cho Actus Networks/HFR, Inc

Examples of Time Transport

Special Articles on PREMIUM 4G Introduction of LTE Advanced. large-capacity, and low-delay to improve

Flexible Access System Architecture: FASA

Flexible and cost efficient optical 5G transport Paolo Monti

G Telecom Profile

Small and Macro Cell deployment Mobile Operator- A case Study. Anil K Reddy Director BD APAC

Considerations on synchronization in next generation CRAN fronthaul architecture. Lv Bo, Hu Changjun, Lu Yang CAICT

Delivering Time and Phase for LTE Networks

Cambium Networks LTE Program. EMEA Partner Event Budapest, July 2018

5G-oriented Optical Transport Network Solution

Asia pacific analyst forum. Beijing 15 september 2011

ITU-T. G Amendment 1 (08/2015) 40-Gigabit-capable passive optical networks (NG-PON2): General requirements

Dali Matrix. The Next Generation Platform for Wireless Coverage and Capacity

INTRODUCING THE 5G-PPP 5G-XHAUL PROJECT Daniel Camps (i2cat) Bristol 5G city testbed with 5G-XHaul extensions

The Ever-Changing Wireless Landscape. How It Will Impact Your Venue

Connect & Go with WDM PON Ea 1100 WDM PON

ecpri Transport Network V1.0 ( )

Management Support for Automatic Measurement of Link Delay Asymmetry

IEEE 1588 Packet Network Synchronization Solution

PoC of Structure agnostic Radio over Ethernet. Peter K. Cho, A. Kim, J. Choi Actus Networks/HFR, Inc

OSA 5410 Series. PTP grandmaster, GNSS receiver and sync probe. Your benefits

Dali virtual Fronthaul Solution. Virtualizing the Fronthaul for 5G

CALNEX PARAGON-X. Testing 1588v2 PTP

IEEE 1914 NGFI (xhaul): efficient and scalable fronthaul transport for 5G

Bidirectional 10&40 km Optical PHY for 50GbE. Xinyuan Wang Huawei Technologies

Future Service Adaptive Access/Aggregation Network Architecture

Transport Requirements for a 5G Broadband Use Case. Vishwanath Ramamurthi Thomas Tan Shankar Venkatraman Verizon

Outdoor LTE-Advanced Pico Base Station optimized for street-level deployments, hot-spots and coverage in-fill

ITU-T. Technical Report GSTR-TN5G. Transport network support of IMT-2020/5G. (19 October 2018)

5G Transport Network Requirements, Architecture and Key Technologies

Multi-Layer and Cloud-Ready Radio Evolution Towards 5G

Multi-access Edge Computing & Openshift

Green Evolution of Mobile Communications (CMCC Perspective)

Randomized User-Centric Clustering for Cloud Radio Access Network with PHY Caching

1 Overview of C-RAN. Chih-Lin I, Jinri Huang, and Ran Duan. 1.1 Introduction

Implementation Agreement MEF Mobile Backhaul Phase 3 - Amendment 1: Time Synchronization. November, 2016

Converged Ethernet for Next- Generation x-haul

Wireless Backhaul Synchronization

ITU-T G /Y

Mobile Backhaul Synchronization

Testing SyncE with Xena s Advanced Timing Test Modules

G Telecom Profile

5G-XHaul Dynamic Reconfigurable Optical-Wireless Backhaul / Fronthaul for 5G Small Cells and Cloud-RANs

5G/IMT2020 Transport Requirements Considerations and Next Steps

Applicability of OTN for NGFI / CPRI Fronthaul. Scott Wakelin Richard Tse Steve Gorshe - Microsemi

iaccess Multi-Service Platform-DM In Band Managed Multi-Service Platform-FRM220 Series

Fiber in the backhaul : Powering mobile Broadband

Synchronization Network Migration with focus on coherent network Primary Reference Time Clocks (cnprtc)

Air4G Innovative. Compact. All-outdoor. Integrated WiMAX and LTE multi-platform base station exceeding the extremes in cost-efficiency

ITU-T Q13/15, Network synchronization and time distribution performance Supporting 5G mobile transport and fronthaul

TIMING; The Key To Unlocking The Benefits Of LTE-A Timing & Security Considerations for Evolved IP Backhaul

Unified Synchronization Solution for Mobile Backhaul

Converged backhaul and fronthaul considerations. Jouni Korhonen Broadcom Ltd. 10/26-28/2016 IEEE TF

Implementation of Software-based EPON-OLT and Performance Evaluation

FRONT-HAUL COMPRESSION FOR EMERGING C- RAN AND SMALL CELL NETWORKS

Guaranteed Service Ethernetbased DWDM co-hauling

LTE-FDD and APTS support over Existing Cable Networks

Turn Up and Maintain Cell Towers Quickly, Safely, and Efficiently

Common Public Radio Interface

The Path to 5G. Market and Technology drivers 3GPP standards CRAN + SDN + NFV Reality or Hype??

Packet-based fronthaul - a critical enabler of 5G

Graph-based Framework for Flexible Baseband Function Splitting and Placement in C-RAN

Evaluating 1588v2 Performance

Opportunities and Challenges Driving C-RAN Forward Monday October 17th. 2016

Next Generation EPON Considerations of ODN, Coexistence and Transmission Speed

RNV Vehicular Communications Part II Radio Networks for Vehicular Communications Roberto Verdone

Testing Timing Synchronization for IP/Ethernet Mobile Backhaul. Nov 2011

The CORD reference architecture addresses the needs of various communications access networks with a wide array of use cases including:

High Capacity Outdoor LTE-Advanced Pico Base Station with Integrated Wireless Backhaul and Carrier Wi-Fi

Transcription:

Access network systems for future mobile backhaul networks Nov. 6, 2012 Seiji Yoshida NTT Network Technology Laboratories NTT Corporation 1

Outline Mobile Traffic Growth in Japan Future Mobile Base Station Configurations Development of Synchronous Access Network Systems 10G-EPON Aggregated Media Converters Frequency Synchronization Characteristics Temperature Cycling Test Time/Phase Synchronization Characteristics Summary 2

Mobile traffic growth in Japan Launches of LTE services and rapid spread of smart phones and tablet devices have accelerated mobile traffic growth in Japan. Total mobile traffic (PB/month) 80 60 40 20 0 Downstream Upstream Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun / 2010 / 2011 / 2012 Month/Year 2.21 times/year 2.27 times/year 3 Data from information & communications Statistics database By Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications in Japan

Future mobile base station configuration To increase spatial capacity, planned cell size will decrease along with small cells over-laid on traffic hot spot areas. Today s mobile base station configuration Future mobile base station configuration X10 # of base stations in urban areas HetNet configuration Densified Macro cells (planned) Cell size BS Overlaid Small cells (Micro, Pico, Femto) (unplanned) 4

Cloud RAN (C-RAN) C-RAN is architectural goal towards BBU consolidation, which could effectively reduce CAPEX/OPEX and power consumption. Today s mobile fronthaul/backhaul architecture Mobile Network C-RAN architecture Mobile Network Mobile Backhaul enodeb BBU RRU BBU BBU Access Network Access Network Optical MUX/DEMUX BBU BBU consolidation Mobile Fronthaul ~20 km Dark Fiber Digital RoF WDM-PON etc 1 Digital RoF 2 N 3 RRU RRU RRU RRU RRU RRU RRU RRU RRH RRH RRH: Remote Radio Head RRU: Remote Radio Unit BBU: Baseband Unit RoF: Radio over Fiber 5

Access network for small cell base stations Requirements for future mobile fronthaul will be different for different types of base station architecture. Type (A): C-RAN Mobile Backhaul Mobile Fronthaul EPC PSN (Carrier Ethernet, etc.) BBU Dark fiber / RRH UE IP packet signal enodeb/ BBU pool Digital RoF signal Type (B): Distributed APs (antennas) with BBU Mobile Backhaul Mobile Fronthaul EPC PSN: Packet Switched Network PON: Passive Optical Network EPC: Evolved Packet Core PSN (Carrier Ethernet, etc.) IP packet signal enodeb Proxy/ GW Act as proxy in place of APs against EPC 6 PSN (Carrier Ethernet, PON etc) IP packet signal BBU AP BBU BBU AP: Access Point GW: Gateway UE

Mobile fronthaul for small cell base stations Mainly applicable cell type Signal type Architecture (toady s technologies) Requirement for transmission delay Effectiveness of BBU consolidation CoMP Options Type (A) C-RAN Macro Cell Digital RoF (CPRI/OBSAI) Dark fiber WDM-PON OTN, etc Severe both in delay and delay variation High NW-MIMO Joint Transmission, etc Type (B) Distributed APs with BBUs Small Cell Packet-based signal (IP, Ethernet) PSN (Ethernet, TDM-PON, etc) relaxed Low Joint Transmission, etc Cost challenge CPRI transceiver SoC (MPU&DSP) CPRI: Common Public Radio Interface CoMP: Coordinated Multi-Point transmission and reception 7 OBSAI: Open Base Station Architecture Initiative

Technical Challenges C-RAN Increasing bandwidth of digital RoF segments in accordance with wireless bandwidth increment towards LTE-advanced. e.g. LTE 10MHz 2x2 MIMO 1.2 Gbps DRoF signal Bandwidth compression of CPRI signal. Limitation of distance between BBU and RRHs. CPRI transmission over public networks. - CPRI could not be electrically multiplexed as in PSN. Redundancy of CPRI transmission path. Distributed APs Distribution of time/frequency to APs over PSN. Transmission latency reduction. Enhancement of cost effectiveness. - SoCs will be key devices for cost reduction. Vendor lock-in. 8

Our Scope We expect future mobile fronthaul/backhaul architecture will be a mixture of Types (A) & (B). Applying synchronous Ethernet technologies (Sync-E & PTP) to access network systems as short-term (STEP-1) solutions to provide phase/time & frequency synchronization to mobile base stations for PSN-based mobile fronthaul/backhaul architecture. In C-RAN, transmitting DRoF signals from each RRH to BBU might be important issue. Cost-effective measures other than using dark fibers require further study. Sync-E: Synchronous Ethernet PTP: Precision Time Protocol (IEEE1588v2) PSN: Packet Switched Network 9

Synchronous Access Network Systems Sync-E and PTP are applied only for access networks in first stage, while core network infrastructures remain unchanged. GPS Synchronized to CSN Clock Signal Clock Signal Synchronized to CSN Clock Supply Networks BTS etc. Carrier Ethernet Networks BTS etc. Correction of Transmission delay Access (Synchronous) Core (Asynchronous) Access (Synchronous) GPS: Global Positioning System BTS: Base Transceiver Station : Optical Line Terminal : Optical Network Unit 10

Synchronous Access Network Systems We have developed two types of synchronous access systems (10G-EPON and aggregated media converters), which can be applied for both consumer and enterprise network services. Coherent/Incoherent hybrid sync operation (Sync-E / PTP, Sync-E / 802.1AS) used to achieve highly precise time/phase sync. Support of multiple reference clock/timing sources. (PRC/PRTC, GPS, and Ether-IF) Target accuracy is ±100 ns for phase/time synchronization. - Assuming application for LTE-advanced CoMP (co-operative multi-cell multiuser MIMO). Clock card redundancy. Holdover capability for both time/phase & frequency. UNI for providing frequency and phase/time synchronization to CPEs. - Ethernet-IF (Sync-E, PTP) and 1PPS/ToD/Clock interface. SSM (ESMC) is supported at UNI as well as inside access systems. PRC: Primary Reference Clock PRTC: Primary Reference Time Clock PPS: Pulse per second ToD: Time of day ESMC: Ethernet Synchronization Message Channel 11

Overview of Synchronous Access Network Systems PTP MC PRC/PRTC switching Clock/Timing Supply network Ethernet GPS Receiver GPS ToD 1PPS Ext. Clock SNI #1 #0 Clock Card OSU #2 OSU #1 Redundant clock cards conduct Holdover operation OSU #N Ether-IF 10MHz 1PPS Phase/time & frequency synchronization at Ethernet UNI UNI Network synchronization via SNI Control Card Synchronous operation management Compensation of timing offset due to transmission delay ToD Dedicated interface for frequency & phase/time synchronization 12

Hybrid sync operation of Sync-E & PTP/802.1AS Coherent Hybrid Operation Central Office GPS Receiver 10 MHz 1PPS /ToD GPS receiver GPS receiver Network PRTC PTP/Sync-E Ethernet Network Incoherent Hybrid Operation PRC Clock supply networks GPS Receiver 64 khz + 8 khz Composite clock 1PPS /ToD Clock Supply GPS receiver PTP/Sync-E GPS Receiver Ethernet 1PPS /ToD 13 Network GPS receiver

10G-EPON Correction of timing offset in access line Multi-Point Control Protocol (MPCP) Ref. Time LocalTimer Gate LocalTimer Report IEEE802.1AS Ref. Time LocalTimer TimeSync message LocalTimer Aggregated media converter Precision Time Protocol (PTP) Ref. Time LocalTimer Sync message Delay req. Delay response LocalTimer 14

PTP Implementation Synchronous access network systems works as PTP boundary clock. In aggregated media converters, PTP is also used for timing offset correction in access line. 10G-EPON IEEE802.1AS PTP S PON IF PON IF PTP M UNI CPE PTP S Aggregated media converters PTP S PTP M PTP PTP S PTP M UNI CPE PTP S media converter media converter 15

10G-EPON Access Systems 10G-EPON 10G-EPON Front view Rear view ANI ToD 1PPS 10 MHz UNI (GbE) UNI (10 GbE) D-sub 9pin (NMEA-0183) 16

Aggregated media converters access systems Control card 10 MHz 1PPS ToD DCS PTP/Sync-E OSU card Clock Card #0 Clock Card #1 D-sub 9pin (NMEA-0183) 17

Frequency Synchronization Characteristics MTIE(s) 10 1 G.823 SEC Mask 50 ppb G.811 PRC Mask 0.1 ppb 100 n Measured data 0.001 ppb 10 n 20 ns 1 n 100 m 1 10 100 1k 10 k 100 k Observation interval(seconds) Long-term TIE is around 20 ns and FFO is < 0.001 ppb. PTP sync messages need to be exchanged only once in 10 5 seconds to achieve +-100-ns phase/time accuracy in hybrid operation. FFO: Fractional Frequency Offset TIE: Time Interval Error MTIE: Maximum Time Interval Error 18

Temperature cycling test Temp. cycling pattern 40ºC 0ºC 3.0 h 1.0 h 3.0 h 1.0 h (1) Access transmission line(optical fiber) (2) Thermostatic chamber Thermostatic chamber SMF 20 km (31ps/km/ºC) Temp. (ºC) 40 Temp. (ºC) 0 40 TIE 0 TIE 10ns /div 10ns /div 0 12 24 36 48 60 Elapsed Time(hours) SMF: Single Mode Fiber 19 0 8 16 24 30 Elapsed Time(hours)

Time/Phase Synchronization Characteristics [10G-EPON/802.1AS] *10 5 times overwriting Phase shift < 60 ns GPS output (Trigger) 0-km output 20-km output 10 ns/div 20

Time Synchronization Characteristics [Media converter/ptp] Phase shift 10 ns 10 ns 100 ns 100 min. Elapsed Time 21

Summary Issues to be considered in future mobile networks were discussed. We developed two types of synchronous access network systems,10g-epon and aggregated media converters. Sync-E/PTP and Sync-E/802.1AS hybrid operation was implemented and highly accurate phase/time synchronization (<100 ns) was achieved. 22