FIELD RESEARCH CORPORATION

FIELD RESEARCH CORPORATION FOUNDED IN 1945 BY MERVIN FIELD 601 California Street San Francisco, California 94108 4153925763 Tabulations From a Field Poll Survey of California Likely Voters in the June 2016 Open Primary for U.S. Senate prepared for the Sacramento Bee and Capitol Alert October 9, 2015 1

Introduction This volume presents the statistical data developed from a Field Poll survey of registered voters in California conducted among 1,002 registered voters September 17October 4, 2015, of whom 694 were considered likely voters in the June 2016 primary about the election for U.S. Senate. The survey was administered by telephone in English and Spanish by live interviewers. Sampling Individual voters were sample at random from listings derived from the statewide voter registration rolls. Once a voter s name and telephone had been selected, interviews are attempted only with the specified voter. Interviews can be conducted on either the voter s landline or cell phone, depending on the source of the telephone listing from the voter file and the preference of the voter. Prior to the start of data collection, professionallytrained telephone interviewers were briefed with regard to the survey s proper calling and interviewing procedures by the Study Director. This session provided both interviewers and supervisors with an overview of the study and includes a questionbyquestion review of all items in the survey. Interviewers then completed survey interviews by telephone through the computerassisted telephone interviewing (TI) system. TI controls the telephone scripts read to individual respondents by displaying the appropriate questionnaire items and their valid response code alternatives in their proper sequence on computer screens at each interviewer's booth. The interviewer then reads each question aloud to the respondent from the screen and enters each respondent's precoded answer category through the keyboard directly to a computer disk. All answers are automatically stored in computer memory. In order to bring hardtoreach respondents into the survey, up to six attempts were made to each telephone number selected for inclusion into the sample. Callbacks were made at different times and on different days to increase the probability of finding voters available for the interview. Where possible, appointments are made at specified dates and times to maximize convenience. 2

Data Processing The data file resulting from TI interviewing is itself virtually errorfree. Even so, a final series of data checks were performed by means of a specially designed cleaning program that scrutinizes each respondent record for internally inconsistent information. Once the data were determined to be clean and errorfree, the overall sample was weighted to align it to its proper statewide proportions by demographic characteristics of the state s registered voter population. Guide to Reading the Tables The following is an explanation of the detailed statistical tabulations contained in this report: The question or questions upon which the data are based is shown at the top of each table. Tables are percentaged vertically with the raw percentage base appearing at the top of each column. The data have been weighted to known parameters of the statewide registered voter population. All percentages and frequencies reported in each table are therefore weighted tabulations. In instances where percentages are calculated on small bases (e.g., when the base is fewer than 100 respondents) the reader is urged to interpret the data with caution, since results are subject to larger levels of sampling error. Throughout the tables an asterisk is used to denote a value of less than 1/2 of 1%. A hyphen indicates zero value. On some tables the percentages may add to more than 100% due to multiple mentions. s of subgroups used in the tabulations may add to less than the total number of respondents due to some respondents not reporting that characteristic. 3

Subgroup Definitions The following are some of the definitions applicable to some of the voter subgroups reported in this volume: Southern California: Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Diego, Imperial, Santa Barbara, Ventura, Kern, and San Luis Obispo counties Northern California: all other 48 California counties Coastal Counties: Inland counties: Los Angeles: San Diego/Orange: So Cal: SF Bay Area: Central Valley: San Diego, Orange, Los Angeles, Ventura, Santa Barbara, San Luis Obispo, Monterey, Santa Cruz, San Mateo, San Francisco, Contra Costa, Alameda, Marin, Napa, Solano, Sonoma, Santa Clara, Mendocino, Humboldt and Del Norte counties all other 38 California counties Los Angeles County San Diego County and Orange counties San Bernardino, Riverside, Imperial, Ventura, Santa Barbara, and San Luis Obispo San Francisco, Marin, Napa, Sonoma, Solano, Contra Costa, Alameda, Santa Clara, San Mateo Butte, Colusa, Fresno, Glenn, Kern, Kings, Madera, Merced, Placer, Sacramento, San Joaquin, Shasta, Stanislaus, Sutter, Tehama, Tulare, Yolo, and Yuba Northern Cal: Alpine, Amador, Calaveras, Del Norte, El Dorado, Humboldt, Inyo, Lake, Lassen, Mariposa, Mendocino, Monterey, Modoc, Mono, Nevada, Plumas, San Benito, Santa Cruz, Sierra, Siskiyou, Trinity, and Tuolumne 4

Estimates of Sampling Error In any survey based on a sampling, there is some sampling error introduced into the data by the process of sampling itself. When the sample has been drawn using random processes, it is possible to apply probability principles to determine the potential range of such error. While survey samples of human populations rarely, if ever, meet all of the criteria theoretically required for the application of these principles, it is customary to use them as an approximation of error that is introduced as a result of sampling. The table below shows the range of error associated with samples of various sizes at the 95% confidence level, which is customary for most public opinion surveys. For example, if 30% of the overall sample of 694 likely voters in the June 2016 primary voters answered yes to a specific question, this statistic would have a sampling error of plus or minus 3.5 percentage points at the 95% confidence level. This means that there is a 95% chance that had the overall population of registered voters statewide been interviewed using the same questionnaire and methods, the results of such a census would yield a result between 26.5% and 33.5%. The same procedure can be used to estimate the sample error ranges of any other statistic contained in this report. Approximate percentage distribution of replies to question Sample size 10% 30% 50% 70% 90% 100 +/ 6.0 +/ 9.2 +/ 10.0 +/ 9.2 +/ 6.0 300 +/ 3.5 +/ 5.3 +/ 5.8 +/ 5.3 +/ 3.5 500 +/ 2.7 +/ 4.1 +/ 4.5 +/ 4.1 +/ 2.7 700 +/ 2.3 +/ 3.5 +/ 3.8 +/ 3.5 +/ 2.3 1000 +/ 1.9 +/ 2.9 +/ 3.2 +/ 2.9 +/ 1.9 There are many other possible sources of error other than sampling variability in this and any other public opinion survey. The overall design and execution of the survey minimized the potential for these other sources of error. 5

Questions Asked U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer has announced that she will not be seeking another term as U.S. Senator next year. I am going to read the names of some people who are likely to run for U.S. Senate in California in 2016. As I read each name, please tell me whether your opinion of that person is favorable, unfavorable or whether you don t know enough about that person to have an opinion. (NAMES AND TITLES READ IN RANDOM ORDER) Is your opinion of (LAST NAME) favorable or unfavorable? (SEE RELEASE FOR NAMES AND TITLES READ) The California primary election for U.S. Senate next June will be an open primary. In an open primary, the candidates from all parties Democrats, s and others will be listed together on the same ballot and voters can choose any candidate from any party. Suppose the open primary election for U.S. Senate were being held today and the candidates were (NAMES AND PARTIES OF ALL NDIDATES READ IN RANDOM ORDER), who would be your first choice? 6

Q19a (Banner 1) UN Southern Northern Region Area Party Registration Coastal counties Inland counties L.A. County San Diego/ Orange So. Central Valley SF Bay Area Northern Democrat No party pref./ others Primary election voter #1 #2 White non Hispanic Q19{QLetter}. Is your opinion of Congresswoman Loretta Sanchez, Democrat, favorable or unfavorable? 694 416 278 504 190 178 143 95 103 134 41 323 206 165 694 485 410 160 58 83 700 408 292 507 194 179 134 95 105 150 37 317 214 170 700 486 420 159 56 82 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 236 145 92 185 51 78 36 31 25 56 10 153 32 51 236 151 108 77 31 30 33.8% 35.5% 31.3% 36.6% 26.3% 43.5% 26.9% 32.4% 23.5% 37.6% 28.1% 48.3% 15.0% 30.2% 33.8% 31.1% 25.7% 48.3% 55.6% 36.6% 177 124 53 118 59 45 44 35 30 19 4 29 110 38 177 138 133 25 7 13 25.3% 30.3% 18.3% 23.4% 30.3% 24.9% 33.1% 36.6% 29.0% 12.4% 11.4% 9.1% 51.4% 22.5% 25.3% 28.3% 31.7% 16.0% 12.8% 16.0% 287 140 147 203 84 57 53 30 50 75 23 135 72 80 287 198 179 57 18 39 41.0% 34.2% 50.4% 40.0% 43.4% 31.6% 40.0% 31.0% 47.5% 49.9% 60.6% 42.6% 33.5% 47.3% 41.0% 40.6% 42.6% 35.7% 31.7% 47.4% Ethnicity Latino Black Asian/ Pacific Isle () Field Research Corporation Table 70 7

Q19a (Banner 2) UN Gender Age Political Ideology Tea Party identification Male Female 1829 3039 4049 5064 65 or older Strongly conservative Moderately conservative Middle of the road Moderately liberal Strongly liberal A Lot/ some Registered All s Born again Christian Q19{QLetter}. Is your opinion of Congresswoman Loretta Sanchez, Democrat, favorable or unfavorable? 694 356 338 108 82 118 209 177 127 55 271 83 144 204 119 85 165 529 700 320 380 94 96 116 217 178 134 54 279 75 145 212 125 87 165 535 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 236 98 138 32 33 46 77 49 22 12 97 32 70 40 10 30 47 189 33.8% 30.6% 36.4% 33.7% 34.1% 39.3% 35.6% 27.7% 16.3% 22.4% 34.7% 43.6% 48.1% 18.9% 8.3% 34.2% 28.7% 35.3% 177 102 75 13 21 28 61 54 74 21 62 3 11 100 70 30 59 118 25.3% 31.7% 19.8% 14.0% 22.2% 24.0% 27.9% 30.6% 55.4% 38.9% 22.1% 4.5% 7.3% 47.2% 56.0% 34.6% 36.0% 22.0% 287 121 166 49 42 43 79 74 38 21 120 39 65 72 45 27 58 229 41.0% 37.6% 43.8% 52.3% 43.7% 36.7% 36.4% 41.8% 28.4% 38.6% 43.2% 51.9% 44.7% 33.9% 35.7% 31.2% 35.3% 42.7% Yes, born again No, not born again Field Research Corporation Table 71 8

Q19a (Banner 3) H.S. or less Some college/ trade school Education Household Income Religion Marital Status College Post work Under $20,000 $20,000 $40,000 $40,000 $60,000 Protestant/ $60,000 More than other $100,000 $100,000 Christian Catholic religion No preference Married/ Not married living together Widow/ separated/ divorced Never married Parent/ Guardian of child under 18 Q19{QLetter}. Is your opinion of Congresswoman Loretta Sanchez, Democrat, favorable or unfavorable? 694 119 212 204 155 80 108 93 149 191 249 155 122 146 412 125 150 184 502 700 118 209 216 154 77 108 93 154 192 251 157 120 150 421 132 140 195 499 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 236 44 70 76 46 29 46 36 55 51 62 70 42 56 135 42 57 70 164 33.8% 37.0% 33.5% 35.4% 30.0% 37.3% 42.6% 38.7% 35.4% 26.5% 24.5% 44.8% 35.1% 37.5% 32.0% 32.2% 40.5% 36.1% 32.8% 177 30 59 48 38 10 24 20 48 61 85 41 22 23 124 33 19 53 123 UN 25.3% 25.3% 28.1% 22.4% 24.9% 13.4% 22.1% 21.1% 31.0% 31.6% 34.0% 26.1% 18.6% 15.7% 29.5% 25.2% 13.3% 27.2% 24.6% 287 45 80 91 70 38 38 37 52 80 104 46 56 70 162 56 65 72 212 41.0% 37.7% 38.4% 42.2% 45.1% 49.3% 35.4% 40.2% 33.6% 41.9% 41.4% 29.1% 46.3% 46.8% 38.4% 42.5% 46.2% 36.7% 42.6% Yes No Field Research Corporation Table 72 9

Q19b (Banner 1) UN Southern Northern Region Area Party Registration Coastal counties Inland counties L.A. County San Diego/ Orange So. Central Valley SF Bay Area Northern Democrat No party pref./ others Primary election voter #1 #2 White non Hispanic Q19{QLetter}. Is your opinion of Assemblyman Rocky Chavez,, favorable or unfavorable? 694 416 278 504 190 178 143 95 103 134 41 323 206 165 694 485 410 160 58 83 700 408 292 507 194 179 134 95 105 150 37 317 214 170 700 486 420 159 56 82 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 75 59 16 54 21 24 21 14 6 6 4 18 41 16 75 50 40 28 2 8 10.8% 14.4% 5.6% 10.7% 10.8% 13.3% 15.5% 15.0% 5.6% 4.3% 10.7% 5.8% 19.0% 9.7% 10.8% 10.4% 9.6% 17.9% 3.4% 9.3% 158 85 73 121 37 46 23 16 23 44 7 101 30 27 158 106 80 41 23 21 22.6% 20.8% 25.1% 23.9% 19.1% 25.5% 17.3% 16.9% 21.9% 29.1% 18.1% 31.8% 14.0% 16.1% 22.6% 21.8% 19.0% 25.6% 41.8% 25.4% 467 264 203 331 136 110 90 65 76 100 27 198 143 126 467 330 300 90 31 53 66.7% 64.8% 69.3% 65.4% 70.1% 61.2% 67.2% 68.1% 72.5% 66.6% 71.2% 62.4% 67.0% 74.2% 66.7% 67.8% 71.4% 56.5% 54.9% 65.3% Ethnicity Latino Black Asian/ Pacific Isle () Field Research Corporation Table 73 10

Q19b (Banner 2) UN Gender Age Political Ideology Tea Party identification Male Female 1829 3039 4049 5064 65 or older Strongly conservative Moderately conservative Middle of the road Moderately liberal Strongly liberal A Lot/ some Registered All s Born again Christian Q19{QLetter}. Is your opinion of Assemblyman Rocky Chavez,, favorable or unfavorable? 694 356 338 108 82 118 209 177 127 55 271 83 144 204 119 85 165 529 700 320 380 94 96 116 217 178 134 54 279 75 145 212 125 87 165 535 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 75 36 40 9 13 14 24 16 26 6 37 3 3 39 26 13 28 47 10.8% 11.1% 10.4% 9.3% 13.5% 11.9% 11.2% 8.8% 19.1% 11.3% 13.4% 4.5% 2.2% 18.7% 20.9% 15.4% 17.0% 8.8% 158 80 78 18 11 27 65 38 23 13 50 20 49 28 11 18 36 123 22.6% 25.1% 20.4% 18.7% 11.7% 23.2% 29.9% 21.1% 17.1% 23.7% 17.8% 26.5% 33.7% 13.4% 8.6% 20.3% 21.6% 22.9% 467 204 263 68 71 75 128 124 85 35 192 51 93 144 88 56 101 366 66.7% 63.8% 69.1% 72.0% 74.8% 64.8% 59.0% 70.1% 63.8% 65.0% 68.9% 69.0% 64.1% 67.9% 70.5% 64.3% 61.4% 68.3% Yes, born again No, not born again Field Research Corporation Table 74 11

Q19b (Banner 3) H.S. or less Some college/ trade school Education Household Income Religion Marital Status College Post work Under $20,000 $20,000 $40,000 $40,000 $60,000 Protestant/ $60,000 More than other $100,000 $100,000 Christian Catholic religion No preference Married/ Not married living together Widow/ separated/ divorced Never married Parent/ Guardian of child under 18 Q19{QLetter}. Is your opinion of Assemblyman Rocky Chavez,, favorable or unfavorable? 694 119 212 204 155 80 108 93 149 191 249 155 122 146 412 125 150 184 502 700 118 209 216 154 77 108 93 154 192 251 157 120 150 421 132 140 195 499 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 75 17 26 20 13 8 13 10 17 21 30 29 7 8 47 7 22 27 48 10.8% 14.4% 12.2% 9.3% 8.2% 10.9% 12.2% 10.5% 11.3% 10.9% 12.1% 18.3% 5.9% 5.1% 11.1% 5.3% 15.4% 13.8% 9.7% 158 28 43 50 37 16 27 21 42 36 56 36 29 32 94 31 32 42 114 UN 22.6% 23.5% 20.4% 23.0% 24.1% 20.6% 25.5% 22.8% 26.9% 18.6% 22.3% 22.8% 24.5% 21.1% 22.4% 23.6% 22.6% 21.6% 22.9% 467 74 141 146 104 53 67 62 95 135 165 92 83 110 280 94 87 126 336 66.7% 62.1% 67.3% 67.7% 67.7% 68.5% 62.3% 66.7% 61.7% 70.5% 65.6% 58.9% 69.5% 73.7% 66.5% 71.1% 61.9% 64.6% 67.4% Yes No Field Research Corporation Table 75 12

Q19c (Banner 1) UN Southern Northern Region Area Party Registration Coastal counties Inland counties L.A. County San Diego/ Orange So. Central Valley SF Bay Area Northern Democrat No party pref./ others Primary election voter #1 #2 White non Hispanic Q19{QLetter}. Is your opinion of State Attorney General Kamala (KAHMAHLAH) Harris, Democrat, favorable or unfavorable? 694 416 278 504 190 178 143 95 103 134 41 323 206 165 694 485 410 160 58 83 700 408 292 507 194 179 134 95 105 150 37 317 214 170 700 486 420 159 56 82 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 282 153 129 225 57 82 40 31 30 80 19 191 33 57 282 207 154 62 38 33 40.3% 37.4% 44.2% 44.4% 29.4% 45.9% 29.8% 32.1% 28.9% 53.5% 50.1% 60.3% 15.5% 33.9% 40.3% 42.5% 36.6% 38.9% 68.5% 40.8% 163 91 72 106 57 35 32 24 34 33 5 22 106 36 163 130 122 28 5 11 23.2% 22.2% 24.7% 20.9% 29.3% 19.3% 24.3% 24.8% 32.8% 21.9% 13.0% 6.8% 49.5% 20.9% 23.2% 26.8% 29.0% 17.5% 9.2% 13.8% 256 165 91 175 80 62 61 41 40 37 14 104 75 77 256 149 145 69 12 37 36.5% 40.4% 31.1% 34.6% 41.4% 34.8% 45.9% 43.1% 38.3% 24.5% 36.9% 32.9% 35.0% 45.2% 36.5% 30.7% 34.4% 43.5% 22.3% 45.4% Ethnicity Latino Black Asian/ Pacific Isle () Field Research Corporation Table 76 13

Q19c (Banner 2) UN Gender Age Political Ideology Tea Party identification Male Female 1829 3039 4049 5064 65 or older Strongly conservative Moderately conservative Middle of the road Moderately liberal Strongly liberal A Lot/ some Registered All s Born again Christian Q19{QLetter}. Is your opinion of State Attorney General Kamala (KAHMAHLAH) Harris, Democrat, favorable or unfavorable? 694 356 338 108 82 118 209 177 127 55 271 83 144 204 119 85 165 529 700 320 380 94 96 116 217 178 134 54 279 75 145 212 125 87 165 535 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 282 123 159 29 40 50 87 77 12 12 112 37 106 38 10 29 49 233 40.3% 38.3% 42.0% 30.4% 41.7% 43.1% 40.0% 43.2% 8.6% 22.6% 40.2% 49.1% 73.2% 18.2% 7.7% 33.3% 29.5% 43.6% 163 96 67 9 18 26 60 50 74 16 55 4 6 95 72 23 59 103 23.2% 30.0% 17.5% 9.1% 19.1% 22.5% 27.5% 28.3% 55.3% 30.2% 19.8% 5.8% 4.3% 45.0% 57.7% 26.6% 36.0% 19.3% 256 102 154 57 37 40 70 51 48 25 111 34 33 78 43 35 57 199 36.5% 31.7% 40.5% 60.5% 39.2% 34.4% 32.5% 28.5% 36.1% 47.3% 40.0% 45.1% 22.5% 36.9% 34.6% 40.1% 34.5% 37.1% Yes, born again No, not born again Field Research Corporation Table 77 14

Q19c (Banner 3) H.S. or less Some college/ trade school Education Household Income Religion Marital Status College Post work Under $20,000 $20,000 $40,000 $40,000 $60,000 Protestant/ $60,000 More than other $100,000 $100,000 Christian Catholic religion No preference Married/ Not married living together Widow/ separated/ divorced Never married Parent/ Guardian of child under 18 Q19{QLetter}. Is your opinion of State Attorney General Kamala (KAHMAHLAH) Harris, Democrat, favorable or unfavorable? 694 119 212 204 155 80 108 93 149 191 249 155 122 146 412 125 150 184 502 700 118 209 216 154 77 108 93 154 192 251 157 120 150 421 132 140 195 499 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 282 30 80 92 79 30 44 39 60 77 81 66 52 74 170 55 52 78 200 40.3% 25.5% 38.2% 42.4% 51.5% 39.0% 40.6% 42.1% 39.0% 40.0% 32.2% 42.2% 43.5% 49.7% 40.4% 41.6% 37.2% 40.3% 40.0% 163 26 59 48 29 10 17 23 38 60 81 35 22 20 106 34 21 47 114 UN 23.2% 22.1% 28.2% 22.1% 18.5% 12.8% 16.2% 24.7% 24.9% 31.1% 32.2% 22.3% 18.2% 13.3% 25.2% 25.8% 15.2% 24.3% 22.8% 256 62 70 76 46 37 47 31 56 56 89 56 46 55 145 43 67 69 186 36.5% 52.4% 33.6% 35.4% 29.9% 48.1% 43.3% 33.3% 36.1% 29.0% 35.6% 35.4% 38.3% 37.0% 34.4% 32.6% 47.5% 35.5% 37.3% Yes No Field Research Corporation Table 78 15

Q19d (Banner 1) UN Southern Northern Region Area Party Registration Coastal counties Inland counties L.A. County San Diego/ Orange So. Central Valley SF Bay Area Northern Democrat No party pref./ others Primary election voter #1 #2 White non Hispanic Q19{QLetter}. Is your opinion of former state Party chair Duf Sundheim,, favorable or unfavorable? 694 416 278 504 190 178 143 95 103 134 41 323 206 165 694 485 410 160 58 83 700 408 292 507 194 179 134 95 105 150 37 317 214 170 700 486 420 159 56 82 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 89 52 37 50 39 15 22 15 21 10 6 15 55 19 89 66 63 16 2 9 12.6% 12.7% 12.6% 9.8% 20.0% 8.3% 16.3% 16.0% 20.2% 6.6% 15.3% 4.6% 25.8% 11.1% 12.6% 13.7% 15.0% 9.9% 4.2% 10.5% 172 93 80 132 40 48 23 21 23 51 6 106 31 35 172 124 97 40 21 18 24.6% 22.7% 27.2% 26.1% 20.5% 26.8% 17.4% 22.3% 22.0% 33.8% 15.9% 33.3% 14.7% 20.7% 24.6% 25.6% 23.0% 24.9% 38.3% 21.5% 440 264 176 324 115 116 89 59 61 89 26 197 127 116 440 296 261 104 32 56 62.8% 64.6% 60.2% 64.0% 59.5% 64.9% 66.3% 61.7% 57.9% 59.7% 68.7% 62.1% 59.5% 68.2% 62.8% 60.8% 62.0% 65.2% 57.5% 68.0% Ethnicity Latino Black Asian/ Pacific Isle () Field Research Corporation Table 79 16

Q19d (Banner 2) UN Gender Age Political Ideology Tea Party identification Male Female 1829 3039 4049 5064 65 or older Strongly conservative Moderately conservative Middle of the road Moderately liberal Strongly liberal A Lot/ some Registered All s Born again Christian Q19{QLetter}. Is your opinion of former state Party chair Duf Sundheim,, favorable or unfavorable? 694 356 338 108 82 118 209 177 127 55 271 83 144 204 119 85 165 529 700 320 380 94 96 116 217 178 134 54 279 75 145 212 125 87 165 535 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 89 46 42 11 6 14 36 21 38 10 35 1 1 53 38 15 35 53 12.6% 14.5% 11.1% 11.5% 6.0% 12.2% 16.8% 12.0% 28.4% 17.8% 12.6% 1.5% 0.5% 25.0% 30.3% 17.2% 21.4% 10.0% 172 84 88 14 18 30 68 42 22 13 49 25 59 38 16 22 35 137 24.6% 26.2% 23.2% 14.9% 18.8% 26.1% 31.5% 23.4% 16.5% 24.7% 17.6% 33.9% 40.6% 17.9% 12.6% 25.4% 21.5% 25.5% 440 190 250 69 72 71 112 115 74 31 194 48 86 121 71 50 94 345 62.8% 59.3% 65.7% 73.6% 75.2% 61.7% 51.8% 64.5% 55.1% 57.5% 69.8% 64.5% 58.9% 57.2% 57.0% 57.4% 57.1% 64.5% Yes, born again No, not born again Field Research Corporation Table 80 17

Q19d (Banner 3) H.S. or less Some college/ trade school Education Household Income Religion Marital Status College Post work Under $20,000 $20,000 $40,000 $40,000 $60,000 Protestant/ $60,000 More than other $100,000 $100,000 Christian Catholic religion No preference Married/ Not married living together Widow/ separated/ divorced Never married Parent/ Guardian of child under 18 Q19{QLetter}. Is your opinion of former state Party chair Duf Sundheim,, favorable or unfavorable? 694 119 212 204 155 80 108 93 149 191 249 155 122 146 412 125 150 184 502 700 118 209 216 154 77 108 93 154 192 251 157 120 150 421 132 140 195 499 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 89 19 28 26 14 6 18 14 16 27 46 24 10 6 53 20 15 27 61 12.6% 16.2% 13.6% 12.2% 9.0% 8.0% 17.0% 15.6% 10.4% 14.2% 18.4% 15.3% 8.6% 4.0% 12.7% 14.9% 10.6% 13.6% 12.3% 172 31 51 44 45 26 27 22 39 40 51 44 28 44 97 36 38 50 120 UN 24.6% 26.1% 24.4% 20.4% 29.5% 34.1% 24.9% 23.3% 25.5% 20.9% 20.3% 28.1% 23.6% 29.6% 22.9% 27.6% 27.2% 25.8% 24.1% 440 68 130 146 95 45 63 57 99 125 154 89 81 99 272 76 87 118 318 62.8% 57.7% 62.0% 67.4% 61.5% 57.9% 58.1% 61.1% 64.0% 65.0% 61.3% 56.6% 67.8% 66.4% 64.4% 57.5% 62.1% 60.6% 63.6% Yes No Field Research Corporation Table 81 18

Q19e (Banner 1) UN Southern Northern Region Area Party Registration Coastal counties Inland counties L.A. County San Diego/ Orange So. Central Valley SF Bay Area Northern Democrat No party pref./ others Primary election voter #1 #2 White non Hispanic Q19{QLetter}. Is your opinion of former state Party chair Tom Del Beccaro (BAHRROH),, favorable or unfavorable? 694 416 278 504 190 178 143 95 103 134 41 323 206 165 694 485 410 160 58 83 700 408 292 507 194 179 134 95 105 150 37 317 214 170 700 486 420 159 56 82 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 72 45 27 45 27 16 17 13 13 7 6 15 43 14 72 52 46 17 5 6 10.3% 11.1% 9.1% 8.8% 13.9% 8.9% 12.5% 13.2% 12.7% 4.8% 16.1% 4.7% 20.2% 8.1% 10.3% 10.8% 10.9% 10.5% 8.4% 7.7% 188 98 90 145 43 54 24 20 28 52 10 123 28 37 188 130 101 47 27 20 26.9% 24.1% 30.7% 28.7% 22.0% 30.4% 18.0% 20.8% 26.6% 34.4% 27.2% 38.9% 13.1% 21.8% 26.9% 26.6% 24.0% 29.4% 48.5% 24.7% 440 265 176 316 124 109 93 63 64 91 21 179 143 119 440 304 273 96 24 55 62.9% 64.8% 60.2% 62.4% 64.1% 60.7% 69.5% 65.9% 60.7% 60.8% 56.7% 56.4% 66.7% 70.1% 62.9% 62.6% 65.0% 60.2% 43.1% 67.6% Ethnicity Latino Black Asian/ Pacific Isle () Field Research Corporation Table 82 19

Q19e (Banner 2) UN Gender Age Political Ideology Tea Party identification Male Female 1829 3039 4049 5064 65 or older Strongly conservative Moderately conservative Middle of the road Moderately liberal Strongly liberal A Lot/ some Registered All s Born again Christian Q19{QLetter}. Is your opinion of former state Party chair Tom Del Beccaro (BAHRROH),, favorable or unfavorable? 694 356 338 108 82 118 209 177 127 55 271 83 144 204 119 85 165 529 700 320 380 94 96 116 217 178 134 54 279 75 145 212 125 87 165 535 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 72 34 38 8 12 13 21 18 30 12 26 1 3 48 30 19 18 53 10.3% 10.6% 10.0% 8.2% 13.0% 11.3% 9.7% 9.9% 22.1% 23.3% 9.3% 1.5% 1.9% 22.8% 23.7% 21.5% 11.2% 10.0% 188 88 101 20 14 30 72 52 17 12 65 25 64 29 12 17 38 151 26.9% 27.3% 26.5% 20.9% 14.2% 26.0% 33.3% 29.5% 12.9% 23.0% 23.4% 33.8% 43.8% 13.9% 9.7% 20.0% 22.8% 28.1% 440 199 241 67 70 73 124 108 87 29 188 48 79 134 83 51 109 332 62.9% 62.1% 63.5% 70.9% 72.8% 62.7% 57.0% 60.6% 65.0% 53.7% 67.3% 64.8% 54.3% 63.3% 66.6% 58.5% 66.0% 61.9% Yes, born again No, not born again Field Research Corporation Table 83 20

Q19e (Banner 3) H.S. or less Some college/ trade school Education Household Income Religion Marital Status College Post work Under $20,000 $20,000 $40,000 $40,000 $60,000 Protestant/ $60,000 More than other $100,000 $100,000 Christian Catholic religion No preference Married/ Not married living together Widow/ separated/ divorced Never married Parent/ Guardian of child under 18 Q19{QLetter}. Is your opinion of former state Party chair Tom Del Beccaro (BAHRROH),, favorable or unfavorable? 694 119 212 204 155 80 108 93 149 191 249 155 122 146 412 125 150 184 502 700 118 209 216 154 77 108 93 154 192 251 157 120 150 421 132 140 195 499 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 72 12 30 21 8 9 8 9 19 21 29 20 10 12 49 12 11 29 43 10.3% 10.3% 14.5% 9.7% 5.4% 12.0% 7.5% 9.5% 12.1% 10.8% 11.5% 12.7% 8.0% 8.2% 11.6% 8.9% 8.1% 14.7% 8.7% 188 35 53 54 46 25 34 23 44 40 57 45 38 39 100 45 40 48 138 UN 26.9% 29.2% 25.2% 24.9% 30.1% 32.3% 31.9% 24.3% 28.7% 20.9% 22.7% 29.0% 31.6% 26.1% 23.8% 34.1% 28.8% 24.8% 27.6% 440 72 126 141 100 43 65 61 91 131 165 91 72 98 272 75 89 118 318 62.9% 60.6% 60.3% 65.3% 64.6% 55.7% 60.7% 66.2% 59.2% 68.3% 65.8% 58.3% 60.4% 65.7% 64.6% 57.0% 63.2% 60.5% 63.7% Yes No Field Research Corporation Table 84 21

Q20a (Banner 1) State Attorney General Kamala Harris, Democrat Congresswoman Loretta Sanchez, Democrat Assemblyman Rocky Chavez, former state Party chair Tom Del Beccaro, former state Party chair Duf Sundheim, OTHER UNDECIDED Southern Northern Region Area Party Registration Coastal counties Inland counties L.A. County San Diego/ Orange So. Central Valley SF Bay Area Northern Democrat No party pref./ others Primary election voter #1 #2 White non Hispanic Q20a. Suppose the open primary election for U.S. Senate were being held today and the candidates were (READ NAMES), who would be your first choice? 694 416 278 504 190 178 143 95 103 134 41 323 206 165 694 485 410 160 58 83 700 408 292 507 194 179 134 95 105 150 37 317 214 170 700 486 420 159 56 82 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 209 103 106 169 40 56 23 24 21 74 11 155 18 36 209 160 124 27 32 29 29.8% 25.3% 36.1% 33.3% 20.8% 31.5% 17.0% 25.3% 19.7% 49.2% 30.2% 49.0% 8.2% 21.3% 29.8% 33.0% 29.5% 17.1% 57.1% 36.0% 117 85 32 84 33 40 26 19 16 11 5 68 17 32 117 65 47 55 9 9 16.7% 20.8% 11.0% 16.6% 16.9% 22.2% 19.3% 20.1% 15.3% 7.6% 12.7% 21.4% 8.0% 19.0% 16.7% 13.4% 11.1% 34.5% 15.2% 11.6% 61 45 16 40 20 11 20 15 9 6 1 9 43 9 61 42 38 19 1 4 8.7% 11.1% 5.3% 8.0% 10.4% 6.0% 14.7% 15.4% 8.4% 3.8% 2.9% 2.7% 20.1% 5.3% 8.7% 8.6% 9.0% 12.0% 2.2% 4.5% 40 24 16 24 16 4 12 8 7 6 3 2 28 11 40 28 32 5 5 5.8% 5.9% 5.6% 4.8% 8.3% 2.3% 8.8% 8.4% 6.5% 4.3% 8.6% 0.7% 12.9% 6.3% 5.8% 5.7% 7.6% 3.3% 6.5% 22 11 11 10 12 3 4 4 8 3 3 17 3 22 19 18 3 1 3 3.2% 2.7% 3.9% 2.1% 6.1% 1.6% 3.2% 4.0% 7.7% 2.2% 0.8% 7.8% 1.9% 3.2% 3.8% 4.2% 1.9% 1.7% 3.5% 9 3 5 6 3 1 1 2 1 4 1 2 3 4 9 7 4 2 2 1 1.3% 0.9% 1.9% 1.2% 1.5% 0.4% 0.7% 1.9% 1.0% 2.5% 1.7% 0.7% 1.4% 2.1% 1.3% 1.4% 1.1% 1.0% 4.1% 0.8% 242 137 106 173 70 65 48 24 44 46 16 78 89 75 242 166 158 48 11 30 34.6% 33.5% 36.1% 34.1% 36.0% 36.0% 36.2% 24.9% 41.5% 30.4% 43.8% 24.7% 41.6% 44.2% 34.6% 34.1% 37.6% 30.2% 19.6% 37.1% Ethnicity Latino Black Asian/ Pacific Isle () Field Research Corporation Table 85 22

Q20a (Banner 2) State Attorney General Kamala Harris, Democrat Congresswoman Loretta Sanchez, Democrat Assemblyman Rocky Chavez, former state Party chair Tom Del Beccaro, former state Party chair Duf Sundheim, OTHER UNDECIDED Gender Age Political Ideology Tea Party identification Male Female 1829 3039 4049 5064 65 or older Strongly conservative Moderately conservative Middle of the road Moderately liberal Strongly liberal A Lot/ some Registered All s Born again Christian Q20a. Suppose the open primary election for U.S. Senate were being held today and the candidates were (READ NAMES), who would be your first choice? 694 356 338 108 82 118 209 177 127 55 271 83 144 204 119 85 165 529 700 320 380 94 96 116 217 178 134 54 279 75 145 212 125 87 165 535 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 209 91 118 20 28 39 65 58 6 9 84 26 81 13 2 11 28 181 29.8% 28.3% 31.1% 20.7% 29.1% 33.7% 29.9% 32.5% 4.4% 16.4% 30.2% 34.9% 56.1% 6.4% 1.7% 13.1% 16.8% 33.8% 117 53 64 16 18 15 44 24 7 9 46 16 36 24 3 21 38 79 16.7% 16.4% 16.9% 17.2% 18.4% 12.9% 20.2% 13.7% 5.1% 17.0% 16.6% 22.1% 25.1% 11.5% 2.7% 24.3% 22.9% 14.8% 61 33 27 5 7 17 18 13 25 5 28 2 1 44 32 11 25 35 8.7% 10.4% 7.2% 5.7% 7.5% 14.5% 8.2% 7.6% 18.8% 10.0% 10.0% 2.1% 0.5% 20.6% 25.9% 13.1% 15.3% 6.6% 40 20 21 5 7 2 13 13 17 7 14 1 2 23 18 6 11 30 5.8% 6.1% 5.4% 4.8% 7.6% 1.7% 6.2% 7.4% 12.5% 13.0% 4.9% 1.0% 1.6% 11.0% 14.2% 6.4% 6.5% 5.5% 22 11 12 4 1 3 8 7 10 10 2 15 14 1 6 16 3.2% 3.3% 3.1% 3.7% 0.9% 2.7% 3.7% 3.8% 7.1% 3.4% 1.1% 7.1% 11.0% 1.4% 3.7% 3.0% 9 6 3 1 1 1 4 2 2 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 1 8 1.3% 1.7% 0.9% 1.4% 1.2% 0.6% 1.9% 1.0% 1.2% 1.7% 0.9% 1.5% 0.6% 0.9% 0.7% 1.3% 0.5% 1.5% 242 108 134 44 34 39 65 60 68 22 95 29 22 90 55 35 57 185 34.6% 33.7% 35.3% 46.3% 35.2% 33.9% 30.0% 34.1% 50.9% 41.8% 34.0% 38.4% 15.2% 42.4% 43.9% 40.4% 34.4% 34.6% Yes, born again No, not born again Field Research Corporation Table 86 23

Q20a (Banner 3) State Attorney General Kamala Harris, Democrat Congresswoman Loretta Sanchez, Democrat Assemblyman Rocky Chavez, former state Party chair Tom Del Beccaro, former state Party chair Duf Sundheim, OTHER UNDECIDED H.S. or less Education Household Income Religion Marital Status Some college/ trade school College Post work $20,000 Under $20,000 $40,000 $40,000 $60,000 $60,000 $100,000 More than $100,000 Protestant/ other Christian Catholic religion No preference Married/ Not married living together Widow/ separated/ divorced Never married Parent/ Guardian of child under 18 Q20a. Suppose the open primary election for U.S. Senate were being held today and the candidates were (READ NAMES), who would be your first choice? 694 119 212 204 155 80 108 93 149 191 249 155 122 146 412 125 150 184 502 700 118 209 216 154 77 108 93 154 192 251 157 120 150 421 132 140 195 499 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 209 10 56 76 65 14 29 32 52 63 62 39 36 66 122 44 39 51 155 29.8% 8.7% 26.8% 35.3% 42.5% 18.0% 27.0% 34.1% 33.8% 32.6% 24.9% 24.6% 30.2% 44.0% 29.0% 33.8% 27.4% 26.0% 31.1% 117 40 31 32 13 25 26 11 25 19 33 38 25 17 67 26 24 36 81 16.7% 33.9% 14.7% 14.9% 8.7% 32.7% 24.1% 12.0% 16.5% 10.1% 13.2% 24.4% 21.1% 11.7% 15.9% 19.7% 16.8% 18.4% 16.1% 61 5 24 15 17 2 13 9 16 17 33 17 4 6 45 8 7 22 38 8.7% 4.4% 11.3% 7.1% 10.7% 2.1% 11.7% 9.9% 10.7% 8.9% 13.0% 11.1% 3.4% 4.1% 10.7% 6.4% 5.1% 11.0% 7.7% 40 4 15 15 6 1 8 4 11 13 19 9 5 5 20 15 5 10 31 5.8% 3.7% 7.1% 6.8% 4.2% 1.8% 7.5% 4.4% 7.1% 6.7% 7.7% 5.6% 4.5% 3.6% 4.8% 11.4% 3.7% 5.0% 6.1% 22 2 7 10 3 1 3 5 3 7 9 4 1 8 12 4 6 3 20 3.2% 2.0% 3.2% 4.7% 2.0% 0.9% 2.8% 5.7% 1.7% 3.7% 3.7% 2.6% 1.0% 5.2% 2.9% 3.1% 4.3% 1.4% 3.9% 9 1 1 4 3 1 1 6 4 2 1 2 4 3 1 3 6 1.3% 0.9% 0.3% 2.0% 1.9% 0.7% 0.5% 2.9% 1.4% 1.1% 0.9% 1.7% 1.1% 2.4% 1.0% 1.6% 1.2% 242 55 77 63 46 34 29 31 46 67 91 48 47 45 151 31 59 71 169 34.6% 46.4% 36.6% 29.3% 29.9% 44.4% 26.8% 33.2% 29.7% 35.0% 36.2% 30.5% 38.9% 29.8% 35.7% 23.2% 41.7% 36.6% 33.8% Yes No 24