WebBench performance on Intel- and AMD-processorbased servers running Red Hat Enterprise Linux v.4.4

Similar documents
Intel Pentium Dualcore processor E2160- based server. Quad-Core Intel Xeon processor X3220- based server

TEST REPORT. SEPTEMBER 2007 Linpack performance on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.1 and 3 AS Intel-based servers

64-bit Black-Scholes financial workload performance and power consumption on uniprocessor Intel-processor-based servers

AMD: WebBench Virtualization Performance Study

iscsi STORAGE ARRAYS: AND DATABASE PERFORMANCE

10Gb iscsi Initiators

How to deploy a Microsoft Windows 10 image to an AMD processor-based laptop or desktop

TEST REPORT. JUNE 2007 SPECjbb2005 performance and power consumption on Dell and HP blade servers

In our testing, we used the WMLS test tool to determine the maximum number of test video streams that each storage solution could handle acceptably.

TEST REPORT. MAY bit financial application-based workload performance on Intel- and AMD-processor-based server platforms.

Dell ImageDirect time savings evaluation

and 8 virtual machines, each one using four virtual processors and 2 GB of RAM to simultaneously execute the workload.

COMPARING DESKTOP DRIVE PERFORMANCE: SEAGATE SOLID STATE HYBRID DRIVE VS. HARD DISK DRIVES AND SEAGATE CLIENT SOLID STATE DRIVE

INCREASING DENSITY AND SIMPLIFYING SETUP WITH INTEL PROCESSOR-POWERED DELL POWEREDGE FX2 ARCHITECTURE

TEST REPORT. AUGUST 2006 SPECjbb2005 performance and power consumption on Intel Xeon 51xx processor-based servers

A PRINCIPLED TECHNOLOGIES TEST SUMMARY DELL REFERENCE CONFIGURATIONS: SCALABLE PERFORMANCE AND SIMPLICITY IN SETUP AUGUST 2012

DEPLOYING NEW DELL SOLUTIONS WITH DELL PRODEPLOY

TIME TO UPDATE FIRMWARE: DELL LIFECYCLE CONTROLLER 2 VS. HP INTELLIGENT PROVISIONING

BENCHMARK CPU TESTING OF 13-INCH-CLASS LAPTOPS

VIRTUALIZATION PERFORMANCE: VMWARE VSPHERE 5 VS. RED HAT ENTERPRISE VIRTUALIZATION 3

A Principled Technologies deployment guide commissioned by QLogic Corporation

Dell ImageDirect time savings evaluation

VIRTUALIZED BACKUP ADVANTAGES OF THE DELL POWERVAULT DL BACKUP TO DISK APPLIANCE POWERED BY SYMANTEC BACKUP EXEC 2010 R3

DATABASE PERFORMANCE OF INTEL CACHE ACCELERATION SOFTWARE

TEST REPORT SEPTEMBER 2009 SPECjbb2005 performance and price of the Dell PowerEdge R710 and HP ProLiant DL380 G6

VDI PERFORMANCE COMPARISON: DELL POWEREDGE FX2 AND FC430 SERVERS WITH VMWARE VIRTUAL SAN (ABRIDGED)

TEST REPORT OCTOBER 2008 SPECjbb performance and power consumption on multi-processor Intel- and AMD-based blade servers

Figure 2: Dell offers significant savings per chassis over HP and IBM in acquisition costs and 1-, 3-, and 5-year TCO.

Save time and IT effort resolving server hardware issues with ProSupport Plus and SupportAssist

A PRINCIPLED TECHNOLOGIES TEST REPORT DELL ACTIVE SYSTEM 800 WITH DELL OPENMANAGE POWER CENTER

BOOSTING YOUR STORAGE SERVER PERFORMANCE WITH THE INTEL XEON PROCESSOR E V2 PRODUCT FAMILY

HP ELITEPAD 1000 G2 POWERED BY INTEL IN HEALTHCARE

WHITE PAPER February Rich clients with thin client data security: a hybrid approach

Comparing battery life and boot performance in Microsoft Windows 10 S and Windows 10 Pro

NetXplorer. Installation Guide. Centralized NetEnforcer Management Software P/N D R3

WORKSTATION HEAT AND POWER USAGE: LENOVO THINKSTATION P900 VS. DELL PRECISION T7910 WORKSTATION

Upgrade to Intel Optane memory and save time on everyday tasks

DELL POWEREDGE C4130 & INTEL XEON PHI COPROCESSOR 7120P

HP ProLiant DL585 server and HP StorageWorks EVA 4400 storage array. Dell PowerEdge R900 server and Dell EqualLogic PS5000 storage array

50 % fewer steps to resolution

Partner Pre-Install Checklist: Common Service Platform Collector (CSP-C) for Smart Portal 0.5

A PRINCIPLED TECHNOLOGIES TEST REPORT. CISCO UCS DELIVERS FASTER BLADE SERVER DEPLOYMENT THAN HP c-class BLADES WITH HP VIRTUAL CONNECT

Support high-performance business applications with a powerful Dell EMC, Nutanix, and Toshiba solution

DELL PREMIUM SUPPORT WITH SUPPORTASSIST TECHNOLOGY IMPROVES THE SUPPORT EXPERIENCE

Wired / Wireless IR IP Camera ICA-108 / ICA-108W. Quick Installation Guide

IBM Tivoli Access Manager for e-business v3.8 Performance Details. Detailed Extranet Results

Avid Configuration Guidelines HP Z640 Dual 8-Core / Dual 10-Core / Dual 12-Core CPU Workstation

SAP SD Benchmark with DB2 and Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 on IBM System x3850 M2

White Paper June 2004

Avid Configuration Guidelines HP Z440 Single 6-core / Single 8-Core CPU Workstation

Z400 / AVID Qualified Operating System choices: Microsoft Windows 7 Professional 64-bit Edition with Service Pack 1

Get more work done with a Chromebook powered by an Intel Core m3 processor

Save hands-on IT administrator time using the Dell EMC OpenManage Essentials profile mobility feature

TEST REPORT APRIL 2010

Workload. Singlebenchmark

for ColdFire Architectures V7.2 Quick Start

CPU PERFORMANCE COMPARISON: VMWARE VCLOUD AIR, MCROSOFT AZURE, AND AMAZON WEB SERVICES

Handle more online transactions with non-volatile memory module based storage

Performance Characteristics on Fast Ethernet and Gigabit networks

Data Sheet ESPRIMO P2550. Your immediately available Office PC ESPRIMO P2550

VMware VMmark V1.1 Results

Avid Configuration Guidelines HP Z640 Dual CPU Workstation Dual 8, 10, 12, 14 and 16 core

Z400 / AVID Qualified Operating System choices: Microsoft Windows 7 Professional 64-bit Edition with Service Pack 1

Avid Configuration Guidelines HP Z820 Dual Six-Core / Dual Eight-Core CPU Workstation

IBM BladeCenter H Type (14 blades) Figure 1: Performance/watt results for each server by blade configuration. Higher numbers are better.

TEST REPORT SEPTEMBER

Performance Characteristics on Gigabit networks

EMC CLARiiON CX3 Series FCP

Reference Architecture

Boost database performance in VMware vsan environments with Toshiba PX05S SAS SSDs and Dell EMC PowerEdge R740xd servers

TEST REPORT JANUARY 2009 Dell TM PowerEdge TM T605 with AMD Opteron TM 2384 and HP ProLiant ML370 G5 Server with Intel Xeon E5450 comparison

X300 Seven User Environment

Quad Quad Core Computer

HCL Infinity Orb K 6015 (Multimedia PC)

Newest generation of HP ProLiant DL380 takes #1 position overall on Oracle E-Business Suite Small Model Benchmark

Installing Service Pack Updater Archive for CodeWarrior Tools (Windows and Linux) Quick Start

Use your favorite Android apps on Chromebooks and spend less time waiting

MICROSOFT SHAREPOINT CONSOLIDATION AND TCO: DELL POWEREDGE R720 VS. HP PROLIANT DL380 G7

Performance and energy consumption of notebook PCs with Intel* and AMD* processors (Vendor 2)

TEST REPORT. DECEMBER 2007 SPECjbb2005 performance and power consumption on Dell, HP, and IBM blade servers

DELL POWEREDGE C6220 AND UBUNTU SERVER: A LAMP REFERENCE ARCHITECTURE

FASTER AND MORE EFFICIENT FLEX SYSTEM MANAGEMENT WITH LENOVO XCLARITY ADMINISTRATOR VS. HP ONEVIEW

Page 1 of 18 Dave Pimm Avid Technology Dec 6th, 2013 Rev B

Avigilon Control Center Server User Guide

Performance Characteristics on Gigabit networks

Avid Configuration Guidelines Dell T7600 Dual Six-Core / Dual Eight-Core CPU Workstation Media Composer 6.x Symphony 6.x NewsCutter 10.

Netegrity SiteMinder 4.61 with Microsoft Active Directory AuthMark Performance Details

Avid Configuration Guidelines Dell T5610 Dual 6-Core, Dual 8-Core & Dual 12-Core CPU Media Composer Symphony NewsCutter 10.5.

CMOS/Mega-Pixel CMOS/CCD Internet Camera ICA-230 / ICA-M230 / ICA-501. Quick Installation Guide

XPC User Guide. For the : SH67H3/SH67H7

WORKSTATION HEAT, SOUND, AND POWER USAGE: LENOVO THINKSTATION S30 VS. HP Z420 WORKSTATION

Avid Configuration Guidelines Dell Precision T Core, CPU Workstation Media Composer Symphony NewsCutter 10.5.

Performance Characteristics on Fast Ethernet, Gigabit and 10 Gigabits networks

AMD NVMe/SATA RAID Quick Start Guide for Windows Operating Systems

NOTEBOOK COMPUTER PERFORMANCE: LENOVO THINKPAD T420 VS. THINKPAD T430

Netegrity SiteMinder 4.51 AuthMark Performance Details

Page 1 of 24 Joe Conforti Avid Technology May 1st, 2013 Z210 Workstation / Minitower Rev B Config Guide (Software only)

CISCO UCS: MEETING THE GROWING NEED FOR BANDWIDTH

L-series 30-user environment

Maximizing Six-Core AMD Opteron Processor Performance with RHEL

Transcription:

TEST REPORT FEBRUARY 2007 WebBench performance on Intel- and AMD-processorbased servers running Red Hat Enterprise Linux v.4.4 Executive summary Intel Corporation (Intel) commissioned Principled Technologies (PT) to measure the WebBench performance on the following dual-processor servers running Red Hat Enterprise Linux v.4.4: Supermicro A+ Server 2021M-T2R+V with dualcore AMD Opteron processor model 2220 SE Supermicro SuperServer 6025B-TR+V with Quad- Core Intel Xeon processor X5355 KEY FINDING The Supermicro SuperServer 6025B-TR+V with two Quad-Core Intel Xeon processor X5355s delivered almost 68 percent higher TEST REPORT FEBRUARY 2006 peak WebBench performance than the Supermicro A+ Server 2021M-T2R+V with two dual-core AMD Opteron processor model 2220 SEs (see Figure 1). Figure 1 shows the median WebBench dynamic CGI test suite peak results, in requests per second (rps), of the test servers. To obtain the median results, we performed three runs with each server and selected the middle peak result of each. A higher number of requests per second is better, because the more Web requests a server can handle, the better. The Supermicro SuperServer 6025B-TR+V with two Quad-Core Intel Xeon processor X5355s produced the highest result, 19,404.8 rps. This result is a 67.7 percent performance increase over the Supermicro A+ Server 2021M-T2R+V with two dual-core AMD Opteron processor model 2220 SEs, which achieved 11,572.5 rps. Workload WebBench 5.0 (128-bit US version) is an industry-standard benchmark for Web server software and hardware. It uses PC clients to send Web requests to the server under test. It generates performance results by incrementally increasing the number of clients making HTTP GET requests to the Web server; the result is a curve showing the performance of the server Requests per second 25000 20000 15000 10000 5000 WebBench results Supermicro A+ Server 2021M-T2R+V w ith dual-core AMD Opteron processor model 2220 SE Supermicro SuperServer 6025B-TR+V w ith Quad-Core Intel Xeon processor X5355 under test. The peak of that curve represents the peak throughput of the server. WebBench reports results in both the total number of requests per second the server handled and total throughput in bytes per second. To be certain that we found the true peak performance in our testing, we measured the processor utilization on the server and made sure that it reached or was extremely close to 100 percent during the test. 0 Processor Figure 1: Peak (dual-processor) performance of the test servers running WebBench 5.0. Higher numbers of requests per second are better.

Test results We ran WebBench s default dynamic CGI test suite, which generates non-secure static and dynamic HTTP 1.0 GET requests. WebBench incrementally increases the number of clients making the GET requests to the Web server. As the workload increases the number of clients, the Web server s processor utilization also increases, until the processors in the Web server are saturated with work. Each workload point with a fixed number of clients is a WebBench mix. The dynamic CGI test suite begins with a mix that involves one client, then a mix with four clients, and then increases the number of clients by four with each mix to a total of 60 clients. A standard WebBench run thus involves 16 mixes. A WebBench run reports the total requests per second a server can perform and the total throughput, in bytes per second, that the server delivered. WebBench reports these results for each mix. A graph of these results yields a performance curve with a peak at some number of clients. Figure 2 shows the WebBench peak results in requests per second and in throughput (bytes per second) of the test servers. Each result is the median of three runs. Server Supermicro A+ Server 2021M-T2R+V with dual-core AMD Opteron processor model 2220 SEs Supermicro SuperServer 6025B-TR+V with Quad-Core Intel Xeon processor X5355s Requests per second Throughput (bytes per second) 11,572.5 61,878,348.5 19,404.8 104,617,203.3 Figure 2: Median requests per second and throughput results for the servers running WebBench. Higher numbers are better. Figure 3 shows a graph of the WebBench requests per second results for both servers. This graph illustrates each server s performance under load for each of the 16 client mixes. As the number of clients increases, so does the load on the server and the number of requests per second the server must perform. During the first couple of mixes, the client count is low, so both servers can handle the load with capacity to spare. As the load increases, however, each server reaches its maximum capacity and the processor utilization becomes 100 percent (or very close to that). The curves in Figure 3 peak and flatten at those points. A higher peak indicates better performance, so the Supermicro SuperServer 6025B-TR+V with two Quad-Core Intel Xeon processor X5355s clearly yielded the better performance. 2

WebBench Results - Requests per Second 25000 Requests per Second 20000 15000 10000 5000 0 1 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 60 Number of Clients Supermicro A+ Server 2021M-T2R+V w ith dual-core AMD Opteron processor model 2220 SE Supermicro SuperServer 6025B-TR+V w ith Quad-Core Intel Xeon processor X5355 Figure 3: Line graph of the WebBench requests per second results for the test servers. A higher peak indicates better performance. Figure 4 shows the WebBench throughput results, in bytes per second, for both servers; a higher peak is better. Again, the Supermicro SuperServer 6025B-TR+V with two Quad-Core Intel Xeon processor X5355s clearly yielded the better performance. 3

WebBench Results - Throughput (Bytes per Second) 120000000 100000000 Bytes per Second 80000000 60000000 40000000 20000000 0 1 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 60 Number of Clients Supermicro A+ Server 2021M-T2R+V w ith dual-core AMD Opteron processor model 2220 SE Supermicro SuperServer 6025B-TR+V w ith Quad-Core Intel Xeon processor X5355 Figure 4: Line graph of the WebBench throughput results for the test servers. A higher peak indicates better performance. Test methodology Figure 5 summarizes some key aspects of the configurations of the server systems; Appendix A provides detailed configuration information. Server Supermicro A+ Server 2021M- T2R+V with two dual-core AMD Opteron processor model 2220 SEs Supermicro SuperServer 6025B-TR+V with two Quad- Core Intel Xeon processor X5355s Processor frequency (GHz) 2.8 GHz 2.66 GHz System bus 2000 MHz HyperTransport 1333 MHz Number of processor packages 2 2 Number of cores per processor package 2 4 Number of hardware threads per core 1 1 Motherboard Super H8DME-2 Supermicro X7DBE+ Chipset NVIDIA MCP55 Pro Intel 5000P Chipset RAM (8GB in each) PC2-5300 PC2-5300 FBDIMM Hard Drive NICs Figure 5: Summary of some key aspects of the server configurations. Intel configured and provided both servers. Western Digital WD740ADFD 74 GB 10,000 RPM NVIDIA MCP55 Pro Chipset Dual-Port Ethernet Controller (integrated) / 2 x Intel PRO/1000 PT Dual Port Server Adapters Western Digital WD740ADFD 74 GB 10,000 RPM Intel PRO/1000 EB Network Dual Port Network Connection (integrated) / 2 x Intel PRO/1000 PT Dual Port Server Adapters 4

With the following exceptions, we used the default BIOS settings on each server: on the Supermicro A+ Server 2021M-T2R+V with two dual-core AMD Opteron processor model 2220 SEs server we changed the OS installation option to Linux. We began by installing a fresh copy of Red Hat Enterprise Linux v.4.4 on both servers. We installed each system with the default operating system (OS) installation options. Installing Zeus Web Server WebBench requires a Web server, so we installed the Zeus Web Server with the following procedure: 1. Type the following commands: a. cd /root/zws b. tar -zxvf Zeus_43r3_Linux-x86_64.tgz c. cd Zeus_43r3_Linux-x86_64 d../zinstall 2. When the installation software prompts you, type accept, and then press Enter to accept the license agreement. 3. Choose installation option 1, and press Enter. 4. Enter the key filename, /root/zws/key.txt or leave it blank for unlicensed mode, then press Enter. 5. When the installation software prompts you to choose a password for the admin server, type password, and then press Enter. 6. When the installation software prompts you to re-enter your password, again type password, then press Enter. 7. When the installation software asks if you want to enable SNMP support for the Web package, select N, then press Enter. 8. Choose a UNIX user for the Web process to run as nobody, then press Enter. 9. Choose a UNIX group for the Web process to run as nobody, then press Enter. 10. When the installation software asks if you would like Zeus to start at system boot, select Y, then press Enter. Deploying WebBench data WebBench includes data that must reside on the server and that the Web server must use. We loaded that data and set the Web server to use it with the following procedure: Type the following commands: 1. mkdir /var/wwwroot 2. cp wbtree.tar.gz /var/wwwroot/ 3. cd /var/wwwroot 4. tar -zxvf wbtree.tar.gz Compiling the CGI application for WebBench WebBench includes a simgic.c source file that you must compile before you can use it for testing. We compiled it with the following procedure: Type the following commands: 1. mkdir /var/wwwroot/cgi-bin 2. cp /var/wwwroot/wbtree/simcgi.c /var/wwwroot/cgi-bin/ 3. cd /var/wwwroot/cgi-bin 4. cc simcgi.c -o sim.cgi Configuring Zeus Web Server We configured the Zeus Web Server as follows: 5

1. Add 2 options to the config file "/usr/local/zeus/web/global.cfg" by typing the following: tuning!modules!cgi!minuid 98 tuning!modules!cgi!mingid 98 2. Set folder permisions by typing the following: chown -R nobody /var/wwwroot/ chgrp -R nobody /var/wwwroot/ 3. Disable firewall by typing the following: chkconfig iptables off Setting up Zeus Web Server Zeus offers a graphical interface to set up the Web Server. We set up the Zeus Web Server using the following steps: 1. Open a Web browser, and navigate to http://server:9090/. a. For the username, type admin. b. For the password, type password. 2. At the Zeus Virtual Server page, enter the following information: a. Virtual Server Name: WebBench b. Host Name and Port: server 80 c. Document Root: /var/wwwroot d. Enabling Customized Error Pages: disabled e. Enabling Statistics Gathering: disabled f. Bind address: (IP addresses) Network test bed configuration To generate the WebBench workload, we used a network with 60 client PCs. Each PC contained an Intel Pentium 4 3.0 GHz with HT Technology (or faster) processor, 512 MB of system memory, a 40 GB hard drive, and a Gigabit Ethernet network adapter. We configured each client with Windows XP Professional with Service Pack 2 and all critical updates available as of January 3, 2006. We split the 60 clients into four segments, or subnets, of 15 clients each. We connected each segment to the server under test via one NETGEAR GS724T Gigabit Smart Switch. To balance the load on the server and to prevent a network throughput bottleneck, we connected each segment to a separate port of the Intel PRO/1000 PT Dual Gigabit Server adapters. Figure 6 illustrates the test bed configuration. 6

Figure 6: Illustration of the test network we used to generate the WebBench workload. 7

Appendix A Test server configuration information This appendix provides detailed configuration information about each of the test server systems, which we list in alphabetical order. Systems Supermicro A+ Server 2021M- T2R+V with two dual-core AMD Opteron processor model 2220 SEs General processor setup Number of processor packages 2 2 Number of cores per processor package 2 4 Number of hardware threads per core 1 1 CPU Vendor AMD Intel Supermicro SuperServer 6025B-TR+V with two Quad- Core Intel Xeon processor X5355s Name dual-core AMD Opteron processor model 2220 SE Stepping 2 7 Socket type F LGA 771 Core frequency (GHz) 2.8 GHz 2.66 GHz Front-side bus frequency (MHz) 2000 MHz HyperTransport 1333 MHz L1 Cache 64 KB + 64 KB (per core) 32 KB + 32 KB (per core) L2 Cache Platform Vendor and model number 2 x 1 MB dual-core AMD Opteron processor model 2220 SE-based server Quad-Core Intel Xeon processor X5355 2 x 4MB (each 4MB shared by 2 cores) Quad-Core Intel Xeon processor X5355-based server Motherboard model number Super H8DME-2 Supermicro X7DBE+ Motherboard chipset NVIDIA MCP55 Pro Intel 5000P Chipset Motherboard revision number A2 92 Motherboard serial number Q5785G16010104 TM66S06520 BIOS name and version American Megatrends Inc. AMIBIOS 08.00.14 11/28/06 Phoenix BIOS DB8A026 Rev 1.1c BIOS settings OS installation Linux Default Memory module(s) Vendor and model number Hynix HYMP525P72BP4-Y5 Kingston KVR667D2D4F5/2G Type PC-5300 PC2-5300 FBDIMM Speed (MHz) 667 MHz 667 MHz Speed in the system currently running 667 MHz 667 MHz @ (MHz) Timing/Latency (tcl-trcd-irptrasmin) 5-5-5-15 5-5-5-15 Size 8186 MB 8196 MB Number of RAM modules 4 4 Chip organization Double-Sided Double-Sided Hard disk Vendor and model number Western Digital Raptor Western Digital Raptor WD740ADFD WD740ADFD Number of disks in system 1 1 Size 74 GB 74 GB 8

Buffer Size 8 MB 8 MB RPM 10,000 10,000 Type SATA SATA Controller NVIDIA MCP55 Pro SATA2 Intel 3100 Chipset SATA Controller Controller Controller driver sata_nv Ata_piix Operating system Name Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 Advanced Server Advanced Server Build number v.4.4 v.4.4 File system Ext3 Ext3 Kernel 2.6.9-42.ELsmp 2.6.9-42.ELsmp Language English English Graphics Vendor and model number ATI ES1000 ATI ES1000 Chipset ATI ES1000 PCI ATI ES1000 PCI Type Integrated Integrated Resolution 1024 x 768 1024 x 768 Driver ATI ES1000 ATI ES1000 Network card/subsystem Vendor and model number NVIDIA MCP55 Pro Chipset Dual- Port Ethernet Controller (integrated) / 2 x Intel PRO/1000 PT Dual Port Server Adapters Intel PRO/1000 EB Network Dual Port Network Connection (integrated) / 2 x Intel PRO/1000 PT Dual Port Server Adapters Type Integrated Integrated Driver eth0 eth0 Optical drive Vendor and model number Matshita DVD-ROM SR-8178 Matshita DVD-ROM SR-8178 Type DVD-ROM CD/DVD Interface Internal Internal Dual/Single layer Single Single USB ports Number 4 4 Type USB 2.0 USB 2.0 Figure 7: Detailed configuration information for the test servers. 9

Appendix B Test network configuration This appendix provides configuration information about the test network we used to run WebBench 5.0 against the servers under test. Client # Make/Model Processor Speed Memory Size/Type Segment/Subnet 1 Client 1 Intel Desktop Board D915GMH Intel Pentium 4 3.0GHz w/ht 512MB PC3200 Client 2 Intel Desktop Board D915GMH Intel Pentium 4 3.0GHz w/ht 512MB PC3200 Client 3 Intel Desktop Board D915GMH Intel Pentium 4 3.0GHz w/ht 512MB PC3200 Client 4 Intel Desktop Board D915GMH Intel Pentium 4 3.0GHz w/ht 512MB PC3200 Client 5 Intel Desktop Board D915GMH Intel Pentium 4 3.0GHz w/ht 512MB PC3200 Client 6 Intel Desktop Board D915GMH Intel Pentium 4 3.0GHz w/ht 512MB PC3200 Client 7 Intel Desktop Board D915GMH Intel Pentium 4 3.0GHz w/ht 512MB PC3200 Client 8 Intel Desktop Board D915GMH Intel Pentium 4 3.0GHz w/ht 512MB PC3200 Client 9 Intel Desktop Board D915GMH Intel Pentium 4 3.0GHz w/ht 512MB PC3200 Client 10 Intel Desktop Board D915GMH Intel Pentium 4 3.0GHz w/ht 512MB PC3200 Client 11 Intel Desktop Board D915GMH Intel Pentium 4 3.0GHz w/ht 512MB PC3200 Client 12 Intel Desktop Board D915GMH Intel Pentium 4 3.0GHz w/ht 512MB PC3200 Client 13 Custom built Intel Pentium 4 3.2GHz w/ht 512MB PC2-5300 Client 14 HP d4100y Intel Pentium D 3.2GHz (DC) 1GB PC2-4300 Client 15 Dell Optiplex GX280 Intel Pentium 4 3.4GHz w/ht 512MB PC3200 Segment/Subnet 2 Client 16 Intel Desktop Board D915GMH Intel Pentium 4 3.0GHz w/ht 512MB PC3200 Client 17 Intel Desktop Board D915GMH Intel Pentium 4 3.0GHz w/ht 512MB PC3200 Client 18 Intel Desktop Board D915GMH Intel Pentium 4 3.0GHz w/ht 512MB PC3200 Client 19 Intel Desktop Board D915GMH Intel Pentium 4 3.0GHz w/ht 512MB PC3200 Client 20 Intel Desktop Board D915GMH Intel Pentium 4 3.0GHz w/ht 512MB PC3200 Client 21 Intel Desktop Board D915GMH Intel Pentium 4 3.0GHz w/ht 512MB PC3200 Client 22 Intel Desktop Board D915GMH Intel Pentium 4 3.0GHz w/ht 512MB PC3200 Client 23 Intel Desktop Board D915GMH Intel Pentium 4 3.0GHz w/ht 512MB PC3200 Client 24 Intel Desktop Board D915GMH Intel Pentium 4 3.0GHz w/ht 512MB PC3200 Client 25 Intel Desktop Board D915GMH Intel Pentium 4 3.0GHz w/ht 512MB PC3200 Client 26 Intel Desktop Board D915GMH Intel Pentium 4 3.0GHz w/ht 512MB PC3200 Client 27 Intel Desktop Board D915GMH Intel Pentium 4 3.0GHz w/ht 512MB PC3200 Client 28 Custom built Intel Pentium 4 3.2GHz w/ht 512MB PC3200 Client 29 HP a750y Intel Pentium 4 3.2GHz w/ht 512MB DDR2-400 Client 30 Custom built Intel Pentium 4 3.6GHz w/ht 512MB PC2-4300 Segment/Subnet 3 Client 31 Intel Desktop Board D915GMH Intel Pentium 4 3.0GHz w/ht 512MB PC3200 Client 32 Intel Desktop Board D915GMH Intel Pentium 4 3.0GHz w/ht 512MB PC3200 Client 33 Intel Desktop Board D915GMH Intel Pentium 4 3.0GHz w/ht 512MB PC3200 Client 34 Intel Desktop Board D915GMH Intel Pentium 4 3.0GHz w/ht 512MB PC3200 Client 35 Intel Desktop Board D915GMH Intel Pentium 4 3.0GHz w/ht 512MB PC3200 Client 36 Intel Desktop Board D915GMH Intel Pentium 4 3.0GHz w/ht 512MB PC3200 Client 37 Intel Desktop Board D915GMH Intel Pentium 4 3.0GHz w/ht 512MB PC3200 Client 38 Intel Desktop Board D915GMH Intel Pentium 4 3.0GHz w/ht 512MB PC3200 Client 39 Intel Desktop Board D915GMH Intel Pentium 4 3.0GHz w/ht 512MB PC3200 Client 40 Intel Desktop Board D915GMH Intel Pentium 4 3.0GHz w/ht 512MB PC3200 Client 41 Intel Desktop Board D915GMH Intel Pentium 4 3.0GHz w/ht 512MB PC3200 Client 42 Intel Desktop Board D915GMH Intel Pentium 4 3.0GHz w/ht 512MB PC3200 10

Client 43 HP dc5100mt Intel Pentium 4 3.2GHz w/ht 512MB PC4200 Client 44 HP m1050y Intel Pentium 4 3.2GHz w/ht 1GB PC3200 Client 45 HP Dc7100CMT Intel Pentium 4 3.4GHz w/ht 512MB PC3200 Segment/Subnet 4 Client 46 Intel Desktop Board D915GMH Intel Pentium 4 3.0GHz w/ht 512MB PC3200 Client 47 Intel Desktop Board D915GMH Intel Pentium 4 3.0GHz w/ht 512MB PC3200 Client 48 Intel Desktop Board D915GMH Intel Pentium 4 3.0GHz w/ht 512MB PC3200 Client 49 Intel Desktop Board D915GMH Intel Pentium 4 3.0GHz w/ht 512MB PC3200 Client 50 Intel Desktop Board D915GMH Intel Pentium 4 3.0GHz w/ht 512MB PC3200 Client 51 Intel Desktop Board D915GMH Intel Pentium 4 3.0GHz w/ht 512MB PC3200 Client 52 Intel Desktop Board D915GMH Intel Pentium 4 3.0GHz w/ht 512MB PC3200 Client 53 Intel Desktop Board D915GMH Intel Pentium 4 3.0GHz w/ht 512MB PC3200 Client 54 Intel Desktop Board D915GMH Intel Pentium 4 3.0GHz w/ht 512MB PC3200 Client 55 Intel Desktop Board D915GMH Intel Pentium 4 3.0GHz w/ht 512MB PC3200 Client 56 Intel Desktop Board D915GMH Intel Pentium 4 3.0GHz w/ht 512MB PC3200 Client 57 Dell Optiplex GX270 Intel Pentium 4 3.2GHz w/ht 512MB PC2700 Client 58 Custom built Intel Pentium 4 3.0GHz w/ht 1GB PC3200 Client 59 IBM ThinkCentre 842243U Intel Pentium 4 3.4GHz w/ht 512MB PC3200 Client 60 Custom built Intel Pentium 4 3.6GHz w/ht 512MB PC2-4300 Figure 8: Configuration information about the test network. Principled Technologies is a registered trademark of Principled Technologies, Inc. All other product names are the trademarks of their respective owners Principled Technologies, Inc. 1007 Slater Road, Suite 250 Durham, NC 27703 www.principledtechnologies.com info@principledtechnologies.com Disclaimer of Warranties; Limitation of Liability: PRINCIPLED TECHNOLOGIES, INC. HAS MADE REASONABLE EFFORTS TO ENSURE THE ACCURACY AND VALIDITY OF ITS TESTING, HOWEVER, PRINCIPLED TECHNOLOGIES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS ANY WARRANTY, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, RELATING TO THE TEST RESULTS AND ANALYSIS, THEIR ACCURACY, COMPLETENESS OR QUALITY, INCLUDING ANY IMPLIED WARRANTY OF FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE. ALL PERSONS OR ENTITIES RELYING ON THE RESULTS OF ANY TESTING DO SO AT THEIR OWN RISK, AND AGREE THAT PRINCIPLED TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ITS EMPLOYEES AND ITS SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL HAVE NO LIABILITY WHATSOEVER FROM ANY CLAIM OF LOSS OR DAMAGE ON ACCOUNT OF ANY ALLEGED ERROR OR DEFECT IN ANY TESTING PROCEDURE OR RESULT. IN NO EVENT SHALL PRINCIPLED TECHNOLOGIES, INC. BE LIABLE FOR INDIRECT, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES IN CONNECTION WITH ITS TESTING, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. IN NO EVENT SHALL PRINCIPLED TECHNOLOGIES, INC. S LIABILITY, INCLUDING FOR DIRECT DAMAGES, EXCEED THE AMOUNTS PAID IN CONNECTION WITH PRINCIPLED TECHNOLOGIES, INC. S TESTING. CUSTOMER S SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE REMEDIES ARE AS SET FORTH HEREIN. 11