Prestack Workflows: Prestack Structure-Oriented Filtering. The Prestack Structure-Oriented Filtering Workflow. Introduction

Similar documents
Constructing a Geometric Attribute Workflow

PRESTACK STRUCTURE-ORIENTED FILTERING PROGRAM sof_prestack

Seismic imaging PROGRAM aaspi_azim_offset_mig

Interactive Velocity Analysis (aaspi_iva): Program: Precompute Velocity Semblance, Interactive Velocity Analysis, Velocity Interpolation

Iterative Fault Enhancement Workflow

(1B) Click Browse and select the AASPI-format file (*.H) that you want to display. After you browse the file, the Colorbar file name (1C), plot title

2D Seismic Utilities Programs: aaspi_segy_read_batch aaspi_2d_combine aaspi_pseudo3d_split aaspi_mega2d_split aaspi_segy_write_batch

COMPUTING APPARENT DIP AND AMPLITUDE GRADIENTS PROGRAM apparent_cmpt. Apparent curvature computation flow charts

Improving Dip Estimates Program filter_dip_components

STRUCTURE-ORIENTED FILTERING OF POSTSTACK DATA Program sof3d

Offset Scaling. Irfan Saputra. December 2008/CE8R3 SAMPLE IMAGE

MODULATING A POLYCHROMATIC IMAGE BY ONE PLOTTED AGAINST LIGHTNESS: PROGRAM hlplot

AASPI SOFTWARE PARALLELIZATION

Enhancing faults and axial planes Program fault_enhancement

y Input k y2 k y1 Introduction

Improved Imaging through Pre-stack Trace Interpolation for missing offsets of OBC data A case study from North Tapti area of West Coast, India

MULTIATTRIBUTE DISPLAY: PROGRAMS hlplot, hsplot, hlsplot, rgbplot, and crossplot

Program flatten reads in an input seismic or attribute volume as well as a picked horizon and generates a flattened output volume:

Well Log Utilities: Program LAS file importer

PSPRO AZIMUTHAL. Big Data Software for Interactive Analysis and Interpretation of Full-Azimuth Seismic Gathers. Power to Decide

Common-angle processing using reflection angle computed by kinematic pre-stack time demigration

P. Bilsby (WesternGeco), D.F. Halliday* (Schlumberger Cambridge Research) & L.R. West (WesternGeco)

Seismic Time Processing. The Basis for Modern Seismic Exploration

We LHR5 06 Multi-dimensional Seismic Data Decomposition for Improved Diffraction Imaging and High Resolution Interpretation

Anisotropy-preserving 5D interpolation by hybrid Fourier transform

Azimuth Moveout (AMO) for data regularization and interpolation. Application to shallow resource plays in Western Canada

Enhanced Imaging of Subsurface by Pre-Stack Merging of Multi-Vintage 3D Data Sets and its Prestack Time Migration A Case Study

Tu N Maximising the Value of Seismic Data for Continued Mature Field Development in the East Shetland Basin

Strategies to preserve the data fidelity at far offset Bo Zhang*, Tao Zhao, Jie Qi and Kurt J. Marfurt, The University of Oklahoma

Data Loading in CE8 SAMPLE IMAGE. Simon Voisey June 2008 Hampson-Russell London Written for CE8R1

P071 Land Data Regularization and Interpolation Using Azimuth Moveout (AMO)

G012 Scattered Ground-roll Attenuation for 2D Land Data Using Seismic Interferometry

Azimuth Moveout Transformation some promising applications from western Canada

FLATTENING AND GENERATING STRATAL SLICES PROGRAMS flatten, vector_flatten, stratal_slice, and vector_stratal_slice

A Short Narrative on the Scope of Work Involved in Data Conditioning and Seismic Reservoir Characterization

We ELI1 02 Evaluating Ocean-bottom Seismic Acquisition in the North Sea - A Phased Survey Design Case Study

Obstacles in the analysis of azimuth information from prestack seismic data Anat Canning* and Alex Malkin, Paradigm.

Using Similarity Attribute as a Quality Control Tool in 5D Interpolation

Downloaded 10/29/15 to Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at

Structurally oriented coherent noise filtering

5D leakage: measuring what 5D interpolation misses Peter Cary*and Mike Perz, Arcis Seismic Solutions

Computing seismic QC attributes, fold and offset sampling in RadExPro software Rev

Examples of GLOBE Claritas Processing

2D Inversions of 3D Marine CSEM Data Hung-Wen Tseng*, Lucy MacGregor, and Rolf V. Ackermann, Rock Solid Images, Inc.

MODULATING A POLYCHROMATIC IMAGE BY A 2 ND IMAGE PLOTTED AGAINST SATURATION AND A 3 RD IMAGE PLOTTED AGAINST LIGHTNESS: PROGRAM hlsplot

Azimuthal binning for improved fracture delineation Gabriel Perez*, Kurt J. Marfurt and Susan Nissen

Seismic Attributes on Frequency-enhanced Seismic Data

Attribute Expression of the Mississippi Lime. Attribute expression of the Mississippi Lime

Tu N Internal Multiple Attenuation on Radial Gathers With Inverse-scattering Series Prediction

Internal Multiple Attenuation on Radial Gathers With Inverse- Scattering Series Prediction

Computation flow chart

Residual Moveout Analysis in a 3D dataset from Amplitude Variations with Offfset

VISTA. Desktop seismic data processing software

Seismic Reflection Method

Pre-Stack Seismic Data Analysis with 3D Visualization A Case Study*

Prestack Seismic Data Analysis with 3D Visualization A Case Study

INTERPOLATION. Stitch_Prep and Stitch modules

A MATLAB version of Equivalent Offset Migration (EOM)

GG450 4/5/2010. Today s material comes from p and in the text book. Please read and understand all of this material!

Missing trace interpolation and its enhancement of seismic processes

Considerations in 3D depth-specific P-S survey design

2010 SEG SEG Denver 2010 Annual Meeting

SeisSpace Software. SeisSpace enables the processor to be able focus on the science instead of being a glorified data manager.

Introduction. Surface and Interbed Multtple Elimination

Chapter 4: Programming with MATLAB

SUMMARY. denoise the original data at each iteration. This can be

Lessons in Spatial Sampling Or... Does Anybody Know the Shape of a Wavefield?

What s New and Where to Find It in V6.8

COMPUTING APPARENT CURVATURE PROGRAM euler_curvature. Euler curvature computation flow chart. Computing Euler curvature

Petrel TIPS&TRICKS from SCM

P068 Case Study 4D Processing OBC versus Streamer Example of OFON filed, Block OML102, Nigeria

Producing a Depth-Converted Seismic Horizon in Z-map

Coherent partial stacking by offset continuation of 2-D prestack data

3-D vertical cable processing using EOM

Fresnel-based infill analysis and image quality

Seamless Pre-Stack Integration of Streamer Datasets with Q-Marine Dataset A Case Study from Eastern Coast of India

Application of 3D source deghosting and designature to deep-water ocean bottom node data Xu Li*, Jing Yang, Hui Chen, Melanie Vu, and Ping Wang (CGG)

Hampson-Russell A CGGVeritas Company Release Notes - Software Release CE8/R1.2 (Last Revision: July 16, 2007) Software Release Date: July 16, 2007

Petrel TIPS&TRICKS from SCM

Spectral Attributes Program spec_cmp. COMPUTING SPECTRAL COMPONENTS USING A COMPLEX MATCHING PURSUITE ALGORITHM PROGRAM spec_cmp

Th SRS3 07 A Global-scale AVO-based Pre-stack QC Workflow - An Ultra-dense Dataset in Tunisia

Summary. Figure 1: Simplified CRS-based imaging workflow. This paper deals with the boxes highlighted in green.

Software Installation: AASPI Windows Installation

Release Notes Software Release HRS-9 / R-1.1

G009 Multi-dimensional Coherency Driven Denoising of Irregular Data

Volumetric Attributes: Computing Texture Attributes Program glcm3d

Design of Surface Seismic Programs for CO2 Storage Monitoring. WesternGeco North America Geophysics Manager Houston

Th Towards Improved Time-lapse Seismic Repetition Accuracy by Use of Multimeasurement Streamer Reconstruction

High definition tomography brings velocities to light Summary Introduction Figure 1:

Efficient Beam Velocity Model Building with Tomography Designed to Accept 3d Residuals Aligning Depth Offset Gathers

About This Version ParkSEIS 2.0

Multicomponent wide-azimuth seismic data for defining fractured reservoirs

MAXIMUM ENTROPY SPECTRAL ANALYSIS PROGRAM spec_max_entropy

Which curvature is right for you? Part - 1

A short antenna optimization tutorial using MMANA-GAL, Part 2

Can we correct for azimuthal variations of residual move-out in land WAZ context, using depth non-linear slope tomography? An imaging case history.

Pre Stack Migration Aperture An Overview

TMSEEG Tutorial. Version 4.0. This tutorial was written by: Sravya Atluri and Matthew Frehlich. Contact:

An implementable alternate survey geometry design for ideal Land 3D Seismic Acquisition

AASPI Software Structure

Transcription:

The Prestack Structure-Oriented Filtering Workflow. Introduction Structure-Oriented Filtering (SOF) involve many programs in AASPI software. Particularly, prestack SOF is tedious and time-consuming. To make the task more automatic, we designed a workflow GUI similar to AASPI geometric attribute workflow. How to run The AASPI Prestack Structure-Oriented Filtering Workflow GUI can be invoked from the aaspi_util_prestack as shown above or by typing in aaspi_sof_prestack_workflow separately in the terminal window. The following workflow GUI will then pop up. Attribute-Assisted Seismic Processing and Interpretation - 18 December 2015 Page 1

2 1 3 4 5 2 6 Step 1: Save the workflow environment parameters In step 1 we need to input the prestack migrated seismic data and set up the project name and the MPI parameters which will be used for all the MPI processes. The seismic amplitude file is selected first (Arrow 1). Enter the project name and the suffix (Arrow 2). Verbose can be selected if required (Arrow 3). It is recommended to use MPI because except euler_curvature all the other processes run on MPIs (Arrow 4). Mention the processors per nodes and the node list. In this case, we use the local machine with 8 processors, so we set the number of processors per node to be 8 (Arrow 5) and the node list to be localhost by default (Arrow 6). After entering out all the parameters these parameters are saved (Green Arrow) which will be subsequently used for all the processes. Note that initially all the steps will be disabled. When the Save Environment parameters is clicked the prestack_mute and the stack buttons will be enabled as shown. These two takes in only the seismic amplitude as inputs and are thus activated. The subsequent buttons will be activated after their input file criterions are met. Attribute-Assisted Seismic Processing and Interpretation - 18 December 2015 Page 2

Enabled Enabled Step 2: Save the parameters for each program In this step each of the program is opened and their parameters are saved. The buttons are activated only when their input criterion are met. For example the dip3d gets activated only after we open and save the stack parameters. The next figure shows the GUIs for prestack_mute, stack, dip3d, filter_dip_component, similarity3d, and sof_prestack programs as an example. For the prestack_mute program, the user need to specify muting times and offsets by clicking Offset_Vs_Time Table button (Arrow 1). Up to 5 offset bin-time pairs can be defined for the top mute (red box). The top mute is linearly interpolated between those pairs. Offset bin is not in distance unit (ft, m), but rather an axis specifically designed for AASPI-migrated data set. The user can determine the offset bin-time pairs simply by displaying the migrated gather and left-clicking on the position where a mute point is prefered. The offset bin time pair is displayed in the bottom of the plot (blue arrow). These pairs must be listed in increasing order of offset bin. If less than 5 pairs are needed, make sure the unused pairs are blank (i.e. do NOT put zeros there). After the Attribute-Assisted Seismic Processing and Interpretation - 18 December 2015 Page 3

table is set up, click Execute button (Arrow 2) and close the offset-vs-time table GUI (Arrow 3), then save parameters for prestack_mute (green arrow). 1 2 Attribute-Assisted Seismic Processing and Interpretation - 18 December 2015 Page 4

For the stack program, it is required that the result is fully stacked (i.e. stacked in both offset and azimuth direction). Thus, make sure all the Stack along axis x are checked (yellow arrow). Then hit save parameters (green arrow). Attribute-Assisted Seismic Processing and Interpretation - 18 December 2015 Page 5

= 2x inline interval = 2x xline interval = 5x sample interval For the dip3d program, it is recommended to set up inline and crossline windows radii (under extended tab) to be twice as much as cdp and line intervals (red box). This will further enhance the filter while only moderately increase computational effort. After that, go back to typical tab. Recommended dip window height is 5x sample interval. Next, save parameter for dip3d (green arrow). Attribute-Assisted Seismic Processing and Interpretation - 18 December 2015 Page 6

For the filter_dip_component program, it is recommended to use LUM filter type in order to preserve edges (such as faults). Also, it is a good practice to set window length, width, and height to be the same with dip3d program (red box). Then hit save parameters (green arrow). Similarly, for the similarity3d program, windows length, width, and height should be kept the same as in dip3d (red box). The recommended similarity for SOF filter is energy ratio similarity (yellow arrow), but the user can choose different type of similarities. Note that if multiple similarity types are selected, only the highest-priority similarity volume is used for SOF filter. The priority is listed in decreasing order, from energy ratio, outer product, to sobel filter similarities. In this case, only energy ratio similarity is used by sof_prestack program. Attribute-Assisted Seismic Processing and Interpretation - 18 December 2015 Page 7

1 2 For the sof_prestack program, again, windows length, width, and height should be consistent with dip3d program. Since it is very computationally intensive for the program to filter along offset direction, it is recommended that maximum offset windows radius is 1 (red box). The user can choose to smooth along azimuthal direction, but it is not recommended for survey that exhibits anisotropy because we want to preserve the azimuthal displacement caused by anisotropy. If the user want to see the difference between original data and filtered data, compute rejected noise should be turned on (Arrow 1). It is also recommended to output LUM-filtered data instead of PCfiltered data to preserve edges (Arrow 2). Next, hit save parameters (green arrow). Attribute-Assisted Seismic Processing and Interpretation - 18 December 2015 Page 8

Step 3: Execute the geometric attribute workflow After all the parameters are set up for all the sub programs, click the execute button to start the workflow (green arrow). If the user want to reset parameter settings, click Reset selections button (orange arrow) and start over again. Attribute-Assisted Seismic Processing and Interpretation - 18 December 2015 Page 9