WORKPAPERS TO PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF DAVID BUCZKOWSKI ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES

Similar documents
WORKPAPERS TO PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF RAJAN AGARWAL ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

ORA DATA REQUEST ORA-SCG-DR-012-DAO SOCALGAS 2016 GRC A SOCALGAS RESPONSE DATE RECEIVED: NOVEMBER 24, 2014 DATE RESPONDED: DECEMBER 15, 2014

2018 General Rate Case. Transmission & Distribution (T&D) Volume 3 R System Planning

The Narragansett Electric Company. d/b/a National Grid (Rhode Island Reliability Project) RIPUC Dkt. No Testimony of. Todd G. Kopoyan, P.E.

ORA DATA REQUEST ORA-SCG-122-LMW SOCALGAS 2019 GRC A SOCALGAS RESPONSE DATE RECEIVED: FEBRUARY 6, 2018 DATE RESPONDED: FEBRUARY 23, 2018

Rocky Mountain Power Exhibit RMP (RTL-1) Docket No Witness: Rick T. Link BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF UTAH

APPLICATION No. To the ALBERTA ENERGY AND UTILITIES BOARD RE:

Figure 1: Summary Status of Actions Recommended in June 2016 Committee Report. Status of Actions Recommended # of Actions Recommended

Cereal Hudson. Tariffs. Anthony S. Campagiorni, Esq. Vice President, Regulatory & Governmental Affairs. Requested Revenue Increases

2018 General Rate Case

Memorandum. This memorandum requires Committee action.


BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) )

The Project Charter. Date of Issue Author Description. Revision Number. Version 0.9 October 27 th, 2014 Moe Yousof Initial Draft

From: Laura Manz, Vice President of Market & Infrastructure Development

2015 General Rate Case

SMALL BUSINESS UTILITY ADVOCATES DATA REQUEST SBUA-SEU-DR-001 SDG&E-SOCALGAS 2019 GRC A

Stem Beach Solar 1041 Application

SCGC-SEU DATA REQUEST-001 SDG&E-SOCALGAS 2019 GRC A /8 SEU SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE DATE RECEIVED: JANUARY 23, 2018 DATE ORIGINALLY RESPONDED:

10.1 BIBLIOGRAPHY Noise and Vibration Study Yard and

SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF RENE F. GARCIA (ADVANCED METERING INFRASTRUCTURE POLICY) November 2014

AGENDA Regular Commission Meeting Port of Portland Headquarters 7200 N.E. Airport Way, 8 th Floor August 13, :30 a.m.

Generation, Transmission, and End User Facilities

ADDENDUM # 3. To prospective Proposers on RFI # 55144: Solar Energy Development and Community Solar at JFK Long-Term Parking Lot:

UPDATES EPC Contract Signed August 2017

Small Generator Interconnection Facilities Study Report. Completed for. ( Interconnection Customer ) Proposed Interconnection Pavant substation

Port Moresby Power Grid Development Project.

Project Presentation April, 2017

Slide 1. Slide 2. Voisey s Bay Project Update

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) )

Los Anseles W Department of 5* Water & Power

To: Honorable Public Utilities Board Submitted by: /s/ Rebecca Irwin Assistant GM Customer Resources. From: Meredith Owens Approved by: /s/

Construct Chiller Plant, Phase I

12 Approval of a New PRESTO Agreement Between York Region and Metrolinx

A.I Task Order 1 - Technical and Analytical Services 1. SCOPE OF WORK. Deliverablc(s): CPUC Implementation Plan Filed. EXHIBIT A: Scope of Services

Interconnection and Transmission

Internal Audit Follow-Up Report. Multiple Use Agreements TxDOT Office of Internal Audit

January 22, The Honorable Kimberly D. Bose Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C.

Exhibit Reference: SCG-39 Witness: Payan Subject: SCG-39 Gas Customer Forecast

FY 2014 Port Everglades Proposed Budget

Memorandum. This memorandum requires Board action. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

B-1-1. Janet L. Fraser Director, Regulatory Affairs Phone: Fax:

CITY OF VANCOUVER ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT

SUBJECT: PRESTO operating agreement renewal update. Committee of the Whole. Transit Department. Recommendation: Purpose: Page 1 of Report TR-01-17

SECTION 106 ACTIVITIES ANNUAL REPORT

ELECTIVE INTERCONNECTION FACILITIES

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PETITION OF PECO ENERGY COMPANY FOR APPROVAL OF ITS SMART METER UNIVERSAL DEPLOYMENT PLAN

University of Pittsburgh

2018 General Rate Case

Corridor Management Committee. January 12, 2017

Standard CIP Cyber Security Critical Cyber Asset Identification

Agenda Item No. AGENDA ITEM BRIEFING

Funding California Investor Owned Utilities Smart Grid Technologies & Deployments

NERC Transmission Availability Data System (TADS): Element Identifier Data Submission Addendum

STATE OF ALASKA RFP NUMBER 2516H009 AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE (1)

Standard CIP Cyber Security Critical Cyber Asset Identification

Small Hydro Regulatory and Permitting Requirements California

Critical Cyber Asset Identification Security Management Controls

VTA s BART Silicon Valley Phase II Extension Project San Jose Downtown Association

Southern California Edison. Leading the Way in Electricity TM

Discussion Guide. Benvoulin Substation Project.

Our Mission: To provide technology resources for the County and set the vision for future technology investments

ENMAX Power Corporation

Malibu Civic Center Stakeholders Meeting. October 25, 2012

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Voisey s Bay Project Supplier Participation Opportunities

July 1, 1999 PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENERGY DIVISION

SECTION 106 ACTIVITIES ANNUAL REPORT

ENMAX Generation Portfolio Inc.

Safe and Reliable Service at Just and Reasonable Rates: The Economics of Storm Hardening

Powered by TCPDF (

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. REPLY BRIEF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY (March 19, 2009)

Progress Report on the GCC Electricity Grid Interconnection in the Middle East

E-rate Program Applicant Training Fiber Options

Electrification - Infrastructure Construction activities in Segment 2:

Federal Data Center Consolidation Initiative (FDCCI) Workshop III: Final Data Center Consolidation Plan

RFP Attachment 13. January 2010

PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION:

Office for Capital Facilities Guidance Document

Subject: Request for Recovery of the Storage Integrity Management Program Balancing Account (SIMPBA) Balance

DHS Overview of Sustainability and Environmental Programs. Dr. Teresa R. Pohlman Executive Director, Sustainability and Environmental Programs

Preliminary 2010 Revenue Requirements. Appendix D. O&M Savings Report

GUIDE TO TRUE ZERO WASTE CERTIFICATION

2012 Innovation Awards Application

Q1 FY08 Highlights and Financial Guidance*

Planning for the Future

Marshall University Information Technology Council. Procedure ITP-16 IT INFRASTRUCTURE AUTHORIZATION PROCEDURE

Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company Public Sector - Federal

Federal Utilities, Postage and Communication Costs FY FY FY 2003 Request. FY 2002 Actual

MT. PROSPECT PARK DISTRICT REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL REQUEST FOR STATEMENTS OF INTEREST, QUALIFICATIONS, PERFORMANCE DATA AND COST PROPOSAL

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT SERVICES

INTERCONNECTION FACILITIES STUDY REPORT

REPORT 2015/149 INTERNAL AUDIT DIVISION

Bicycle Access & Parking Plan Project List Review

Physical Security Reliability Standard Implementation

Director of Public Works/City Engineer. Secretary. Word Processor. Streets and Facilities Supervisor. Traffic Signal Technician.

Northern Virginia Transportation Authority

Report. Diemer Plant Improvements Program Audit Report. Internal Audit Report for January 2011

LADWP POWER INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN

Approval of Navy Yard Chiller Joint Development Agreement

Transcription:

Application of SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS ) COMPANY for authority to update its gas ) requirement and base rates ) effective January 1, 2019 (U 904-G) ) Application No. 17-10- Exhibit No.: (SCG-11-CWP) WORKPAPERS TO PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF DAVID BUCZKOWSKI ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OCTOBER 2017

DIRECT COST, INDIRECT COST, and SCHEDULE WORKPAPERS Witness: D. Buczkowski Aliso Canyon Turbine Replacement Project Capital Direct Costs Project Summary Central Compressor Station Substation & Electrical Infrastructure Environmental Buildings Other Costs Company Labor Capital Indirect Costs Overheads AFUDC Property Taxes Other Cost Savings Corresponding Tables Workpaper Page SCG 11 CWP 01 SCG 11 CWP 02 SCG 11 CWP 03 SCG 11 CWP 04 SCG 11 CWP 05 SCG 11 CWP 06 SCG 11 CWP 07 SCG 11 CWP 08 SCG 11 CWP 09 SCG 11 CWP 10 SCG 11 CWP 11 SCG 11 CWP 12 SCG 11 CWP i

Summary of ACTR Total Cost by Year IN SERVICE DATE 11/30/2017 Forecast August 2017 Project s 2006 through July 2017 through 2018 ($ in Millions) 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2017 Forecast 2018 Forecast Total Direct Capital $0.8 $0.4 $0.1 $0.9 $0.5 $2.5 $1.8 $4.7 $77.1 $53.2 $51.8 $12.1 $6.1 $0.7 $212.6 Total Indirect Capital $0.1 $0.2 $0.2 $0.4 $0.5 $0.9 $1.0 $2.0 $6.8 $12.6 $18.9 $10.1 $8.8 $0.5 $62.9 Total Capital Cost $0.9 $0.6 $0.3 $1.3 $1.0 $3.4 $2.8 $6.7 $83.9 $65.7 $70.7 $22.1 $14.9 $1.2 $275.4 The main objectives of the Project are to reduce the potential for interruptions in the ability to store gas in the Aliso Canyon Storage Field by: (1) replacing the obsolete TDC compressor station; (2) replacing the TDCs and expanding the overall injection capacity at the field in a timely manner; (3) converting the TDC compression units within the Storage Field from natural gas to electric power; (4) designing and constructing a new electric compressor station and all necessary related electrical infrastructure; (5) providing improved vehicle access and security to the Storage Field to facilitate project construction and operation of the new compressor station by building a new guard house; (6) relocating and replacing offices in close proximity to the current TDC station and Storage Field facilities; (6) perserving other on site facilities and minimizing changes to Storage Field facilities where feasible and practicable; and (7) utilizing recent engineering and technological advances. SCG 11 CWP 01

ACTR Central Compressor Station IN SERVICE DATE 11/30/2017 Forecast August 2017 Project s 2006 through July 2017 through 2018 DIRECT LABOR DIRECT NON LABOR $702 $341 $90 $229 $66 $440 $265 $649 $58,116 $37,147 $37,573 $7,162 $3,619 $200 $146,600 TOTAL DIRECT CAPITAL $702 $341 $90 $229 $66 $440 $265 $649 $58,116 $37,147 $37,573 $7,162 $3,619 $200 $146,600 The Central Compressor Station included three gas compressors, three 22,000HP gas compressor motors, three 600HP mechanical clutches pony motors, seal gas system, compressor discharge cooler system, surge control system, TDC inlet filter separators, compressor suction scrubbers, fluid coupling/gear, instrument/utility air compressor package, overhead crane, and building to house the equipment. Construction activities for the Central Compressor Station involved clearing and grading; construction of building and equipment foundations; ground surface preparation at access points within the equipment area; erection of structures to house the compressors and associated control equipment; installation of equipment and piping; and cleanup and restoration of the site. Tie in activities were performed by SoCalGas. Cost Element Costs Forecasted Spend ($ in Thousands) Labor Non Labor Total ETC Preliminary Engineering $ $1,700 $1,700 $0 $1,700 EPC Contract $ $132,247 $132,247 $1,990 $134,237 Owner's Engineer and Other Engineering Services $ $4,924 $4,924 $1,450 $6,374 Other Costs $ $3,910 $3,910 $379 $4,289 Subtotal Central Compressor Station Direct Cost $ $142,781 $142,781 $3,819 $146,600 Project execution is ongoing, including construction punchlist items, testing, commissioning, and closeout operations. basis assumes central compressor station in service in November 2017. ETC Forecast Cost The 2017 and 2018 ETC costs include estimated and known future costs associated with the EPC vendor and the owner's engineer. EPC scope includes remaining milestone payments such as performance testing and demobilization. Owner's engineer remaining scope includes assisting SoCalGas with close out operations. Remaining items in Other Costs include inspection services. SCG 11 CWP 02

ACTR Electrical Substation IN SERVICE DATE 11/30/2017 Forecast August 2017 Project s 2006 through July 2017 through 2018 DIRECT LABOR DIRECT NON LABOR $0 $50 $0 $35 $130 $1,232 $201 $2,721 $9,213 $4,885 $4,570 $547 $300 $0 $23,883 TOTAL DIRECT CAPITAL $0 $50 $0 $35 $130 $1,232 $201 $2,721 $9,213 $4,885 $4,570 $547 $300 $0 $23,883 Design and construction of a 56 MVA substation on approximately 300ft x 155ft lot. The substation consists of two 38.8 MVA 66/12 KV transformers, a six position 66KV switch rack with two incoming 66 KV lines, two 14.4 MVAR 66 KV capacitor bank, an 8 position 12KV distribution service rack with 4 12 KV circuits and 12 KV compensated revenue metering. Forecasted Spend ($ in Cost Cost Element Thousands) Labor Non Labor Total ETC Substation* $ $13,320 $13,320 $0 $13,320 Site Preparation $ $5,224 $5,224 $0 $5,224 Plant Powerline $ $5,039 $5,039 $300 $5,339 Total Electrical Substation Direct Costs $ $23,583 $23,583 $300 $23,883 Project construction is ongoing. is directly related to the central compressor station schedule. ETC Forecast Cost The 2017 ETC costs include estimated and known future costs associated with the plant powerline vendor. Notes The 2017 ETC costs include estimated and known future costs associated with the plant powerline vendor. SCG 11 CWP 03

ACTR Environmental Costs IN SERVICE DATE 11/30/2017 Forecast August 2017 through Project s 2006 through July 2017 2018 DIRECT LABOR DIRECT NON LABOR $0 $0 $0 $471 $124 $466 $598 $494 $2,880 $2,557 $2,793 $1,243 $1,389 $0 $13,016 TOTAL DIRECT CAPITAL $0 $0 $0 $471 $124 $466 $598 $494 $2,880 $2,557 $2,793 $1,243 $1,389 $0 $13,016 The environmental costs cover CPUC and SCG consultant costs to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) including development of Proponents Environmental Assessment (PEA) and Environmental Impact Report (EIR), as well as surveying, monitoring and reporting during project execution for the compressor station site, substation site and access road, office building and guard station, multiple fill sites, parking areas, temporary office sites and staging areas. In addition, environmental costs also include mitigation fees for Santa Paula Creek Coastal Sage Scrub Habitat, oak trees and air emissions. Cost Element Cost Forecasted Spend ($ in Thousands) Labor Non Labor Total ETC CPUC Monitoring $ $2,328 $2,328 $0 $2,328 SCG Monitoring $ $8,615 $8,615 $1,315 $9,930 Mitigation Fees $ $684 $684 $74 $758 Total Environmental Direct Costs $ $11,627 $11,627 $1,389 $13,016 Project construction is ongoing. is directly related to any project construction activity requiring environmental monitoring and mitigation. ETC Forecast The ETC forecast includes additional SoCalGas environmental monitoring required for the remaining construction activities. The amount of environmental monitoring is expected to reduce as remaining activities become less environmentally impactful. SCG 11 CWP 04

ACTR Buildings IN SERVICE DATES 6/3/2015 & 12/30/2016 Project s 2006 through July 2017 Forecast August 2017 through 2018 DIRECT LABOR DIRECT NON LABOR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $111 $207 $327 $3,668 $2,521 $5,142 $1,435 $60 $0 $13,471 TOTAL DIRECT CAPITAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $111 $207 $327 $3,668 $2,521 $5,142 $1,435 $60 $0 $13,471 The Buildings cost component includes relocation of the guard house and replacement of the office trailers with new office buildings. The scope included relocation of existing office trailers, relocating the existing guard house, widening of the existing road from one lane to two lanes in and one lane out. Cost Element New Office Buildings Guard House Relocation Total Buildings Direct Costs Cost Forecasted Spend ($ in Thousands) Labor Non Labor Total ETC $ $11,514 $11,514 $60 $11,574 $ $1,897 $1,897 $0 $1,897 $0 $13,411 $13,411 $60 $13,471 Project construction was completed for this scope of work in June 2015 and December 2016. ETC Forecast The ETC forecast is based on 2017 actuals through July of actual spend and anticipated effort known at the time of the forecast. This includes the temporary trailer rentals used by the company labor project management team. SCG 11 CWP 05

ACTR Other Costs IN SERVICE DATE 11/30/2017 Forecast August 2017 Project s 2006 through July 2017 through 2018 DIRECT LABOR DIRECT NON LABOR $14 $0 $0 $12 $61 $11 $193 $70 $2,204 $4,417 $238 $920 $250 $0 $8,390 TOTAL DIRECT CAPITAL $14 $0 $0 $12 $61 $11 $193 $70 $2,204 $4,417 $238 $920 $250 $0 $8,390 The Fill Sites work included the costs with preparing, filling, compacting, maintaining, and restoring the soil fill sites used on the project. Other costs include the work scopes associated project controls support, other consultants, minor electrical work, office furniture, and other costs that did not fit in to the main project elements. Fill Sites Other Construction Total Cost Element Cost Forecasted Spend ($ in Thousands) Labor Non Labor Total ETC $ $5,413 $5,413 $0 $5,413 $ $2,727 $2,727 $250 $2,977 $ $8,140 $8,140 $250 $8,390 The fill site work was completed once excavation and grading of soil was completed. The remaining other costs include project support such as project controls and assistance with reasonbleness review ETC Forecast The ETC forecast includes ongoing project support calculated based on recent project actuals incurred by the project during 2017 SCG 11 CWP 06

ACTR Company Labor Forecast August 2017 through Project s 2006 through July 2017 2018 DIRECT LABOR $37 $18 $15 $158 $146 $263 $325 $421 $1,053 $1,627 $1,439 $783 $462 $462 $7,210 DIRECT NON LABOR TOTAL DIRECT CAPITAL $37 $18 $15 $158 $146 $263 $325 $421 $1,053 $1,627 $1,439 $783 $462 $462 $7,210 Company labor for ACTR include technical and management personnel at the construction site as well as support from the home office working on the design, procurement for services and material, contract management, project controls and closeout activities. Cost Center Labor (s $ in Thousands) Forecasted ETC Forecasted Core Project Management Team $3,406 $805 $4,210 Project Controls $238 $119 $357 Document Control $298 $0 $298 Engineering $761 $0 $761 Storage $830 $0 $830 Environmental $550 $0 $550 Other $204 $0 $204 ACTR Company Labor $6,286 $924 $7,210 The remaining schedule for company labor includes project management throughout construction and associated project closeout. ETC Forecast The ETC forecast includes ongoing project support calculated based on recent project actuals incurred by the project during 2017. SCG 11 CWP 07

Aliso Canyon Project PEA Project Award Environmental Resource Analysis Review Draft and Final 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Variation CPCN Submittal and Approval 4 Years SoCalGas EPC RFP RFP Compilation Job Walks/Bid Evaluations SoCalGas EPC Award EPC Contract Engineering Procurement Construction Commissioning and Start UP SCEdison EPC 66kV Line and Sub 1 Year 1.25 Years 2 Years 1.25 years SCG 11 CWP 08

ACTR Overheads Project s 2006 through July 2017 Forecast August 2017 through 2018 INDIRECT CAPITAL COST $89 $44 $29 $233 $205 $413 $439 $557 $1,865 $2,151 $3,179 $927 $581 $514 $11,225 TOTAL INDIRECT CAPITAL $89 $44 $29 $233 $205 $413 $439 $557 $1,865 $2,151 $3,179 $927 $581 $514 $11,225 The ACTR total project costs include overhead allocations based on direct capital costs, consistent with their classification as company labor, contract labor, or purchased services and materials. Overhead allocations are those activities and services that are associated with direct costs and benefits, such as payroll taxes and pension and benefits, or costs that cannot be economically direct charged, such as administrative and general overheads. The overhead allocations adhere to the methodology proposed by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and were derived using the same methodology approved in SoCalGas most recent GRC filing. Overheads will continue to affect project costs until the project is closed out, estimated during 2018. ETC Forecast The forecasted amount of overheads during 2017 and 2018 is estimated from the estimated capital cost estimated in the direct cost ETC forecasts. SCG 11 CWP 09

ACTR AFUDC INDIRECT CAPITAL COST $15 $108 $128 $183 $293 $451 $564 $1,269 $4,456 $9,282 $13,915 $8,052 $7,228 $0 $45,943 TOTAL INDIRECT CAPITAL $15 $108 $128 $183 $293 $451 $564 $1,269 $4,456 $9,282 $13,915 $8,052 $7,228 $0 $45,943 The total project costs authorized by the Commission include an estimate of AFUDC and was based on the estimated direct capital cost, estimated overhead costs and proposed project schedule. The AFUDC allocations adhere to the methodology derived using the same methodology approved in SoCalGas most recent GRC filing. AFUDC will continue to affect project costs until the project is put in to service, estimated 11/30/2017. Project s 2006 through July 2017 ETC Forecast The forecasted amount of AFUDC during 2017 is estimated from the estimated capital cost estimated in the direct cost ETC forecasts. Forecast August 2017 through 2018 SCG 11 CWP 10

ACTR Property Taxes Project s 2006 through July 2017 Forecast August 2017 through 2018 INDIRECT CAPITAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $197 $488 $1,146 $1,834 $1,074 $967 $0 $5,706 TOTAL INDIRECT CAPITAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $197 $488 $1,146 $1,834 $1,074 $967 $0 $5,706 The Code of Federal Regulations specifies that ad valorem taxes on physical property during a period of construction shall be included in the capital construction costs. Property Tax will continue to affect project costs until the project is put in to service, estimated 11/30/2017. ETC Forecast The forecasted amount of property tax during 2017 is estimated from the estimated property tax for the facility. SCG 11 CWP 11

Cost Savings ACTR Facility Savings Projected CPCN Application 2011 2012 2013 2014 Savings Variance 3rd Party O&M $375 $300 $387 $289 $292 $317 $58 Direct Labor O&M $220 $155 $65 Air Emission Fees $114 $236 $249 $176 $175 $209 $95 O&M Avoided Costs $709 $681 $28 SoCalGas AFA Cost Increase $266 $347 $81 Total Net O&M Savings $443 $334 $109 Air Emissions Savings Projected CPCN Application Savings Variance Reclaim NOx RTC* $650 $656 $6 Greenhouse Gas Savings $ $861 $861 Air Emissions Total Cost/(Savings) $650 $1,517 $867 Capital Savings Projected Cost CPCN Application 2011 2012 2013 2014 Savings Variance Capital Maintenance $512 $2,948 $1,608 $1,100 $1,623 $1,820 $1,308 Total Capital Cost Savings $512 $1,820 $1,308 The cost savings associated with eliminating maintenance related to the old gas compressors, operations and maintenance costs and benefits associated with decreased charges from third parties, reduction in internal labor costs, and other associated fees. The additional cost is due to the SCE added facilities agreement due to the electrical infrastructure upgrades required by the project. Savings will be ongoing. Savings Forecast The facility costs table above is calculated using 4 year averages from 2011 2014 where shown, the direct labor O&M was calculated using annual salary. The air emissions table is an updated estimate for savings in 2019. The SCE AFA cost is calculated using an invoice from January 1, 2017 to February 1, 2017 from SCE. SCG 11 CWP 12