The DPM metamodel detail

Similar documents
Taxonomy Summit, Modeling taxonomies using DPM, Andreas Weller/EBA and 3/22/2012

PUBLIC CONSULTATION ON EBA XBRL TAXONOMY V2.1 EBA/CP/2014/ March Consultation Paper

Data Points Structure Explanatory Documentation

Operational readiness for EBA Taxonomies

COREP DRAFT DATA POINT MODEL

Improving transparency in financial and business reporting Harmonisation topics Part 1: European data point methodology for supervisory reporting

COREP/FINREP XBRL Taxonomy v2.0.0

ECB Supervisory Reporting Update

Eurofiling Framework Taxonomy Architecture

Improving transparency in financial and business reporting Harmonisation topics Part 2: Guidelines for data point modelling

Digital Financial Reporting

BIRD Handbook. February 2017

CRD IV Technical Update. October, 2013

17th XBRL Europe Day Frankfurt, Eric JARRY, Derek De BRANDT

The MUSING Approach for Combining XBRL and Semantic Web Data. ~ Position Paper ~

Central Bank of Ireland

The ECB supervisory data quality framework

Financial Statements XBRL Utility v Release Notes

EIOPA Solvency II DPM Documentation

MICRODATA MANAGEMENT AT THE BANCO DE ESPAÑA

EIOPA Solvency II DPM Documentation

CRD IV XBRL File Upload User Guidelines Document

EXPLORING A SEMANTIC FRAMEWORK FOR INTEGRATING DPM, XBRL AND SDMX DATA. Roberto García. Associate Professor Universitat de Lleida

Axiom is pleased to respond to this consultation on the XBRL taxonomy.

Supervisory Working Group. Derek De Brandt Aguilonius (excused) Eric Jarry Banque de France (excused) Vincent Le Moal-Joubel Banque de France

Effective Risk Data Aggregation & Risk Reporting

Exchange and analysis of reporting data

APPLYING KNOWLEDGE BASED AI TO MODERN DATA MANAGEMENT. Mani Keeran, CFA Gi Kim, CFA Preeti Sharma

DLV02.01 Business processes. Study on functional, technical and semantic interoperability requirements for the Single Digital Gateway implementation

XBRL Taxonomy Generator Overview of features and interface

BRINGING DATA INTO FOCUS

The Structure of the COREP Template Taxonomies

XBRLS Architecture Specification

CRD IV STATUS AND ROADMAP OF XBRL REPORTING

EBA 2017 EU wide transparency exercise dataset

XBRL Design and Modeling Methodology in Practice

Kick-off Meeting DPIA Test phase

NZX Participant Compliance

Developer Guide FRC Taxonomies

FIBO Operational Ontologies Briefing for the Object Management Group

USER S GUIDE Version 1.0

Taxonomy Architecture Guidance Observation Document Version 1.0

What is a Data Model?

The Two Dimensions of Data Privacy Measures

Formula Meta Description

The Financial Industry Business Ontology

Key Concepts Sapient. All Rights Reserved.

Lasso Your Business Users by Designing Information Pathways to Optimize Standardized Reporting in SAS Visual Analytics

NZ Certificate in Credit Management (Level 4)

Vocabulary-Driven Enterprise Architecture Development Guidelines for DoDAF AV-2: Design and Development of the Integrated Dictionary

ISO/IEC INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Information technology Metadata registries (MDR) Part 3: Registry metamodel and basic attributes

Internet Printing Protocol (IPP): Production Printing Attributes Set1

Special Purpose Entities (SPE) - FVC and SPV

REGULATORY REPORTING FOR FINANCIAL SERVICES

Release Notes for Industry Models BFMDW/BDW/FMDW for m1

Updates on Solvency II XBRL Taxonomy. 5 May 2014, Rome XBRL Conference

A Model-driven Regulatory Compliance Framework

Information & Translation Technologies

T2S GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE BUSINESS FUNCTIONALITY

For each use case, the business need, usage scenario and derived requirements are stated. 1.1 USE CASE 1: EXPLORE AND SEARCH FOR SEMANTIC ASSESTS

John Snare Chair Standards Australia Committee IT/12/4

T2S GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE BUSINESS FUNCTIONALITY

DATA Act Information Model Schema (DAIMS) Architecture. U.S. Department of the Treasury

DPM ARCHITECT RELATIONAL DATABASE BACK-END

BBK3253 Knowledge Management Prepared by Dr Khairul Anuar

Update on the XBRL Architecture, Taxonomies and DPM Eurofiling Conference. Frankfurt, 12 November 2012

Introduction The content of the IFRS Taxonomy is designed to accurately reflect the presentation and disclosure requirements of IFRS Standards as

A New Data Structure and Codification for Balance of Payments. Rodrigo Oliveira-Soares and René Piche SDMX Conference, Washington DC 2 May 2011

Credit data collection. Description of electronic reporting

Introduction to Relational Databases. Introduction to Relational Databases cont: Introduction to Relational Databases cont: Relational Data structure

Guidelines for a flexible and resilient statistical system: the architecture of the new Portuguese BOP/IIP system

Agenda Paper 3B: Draft guide for review by members of the IFRS

MATLAB-Based Policy Simulator

Chapter No. 2 Class modeling CO:-Sketch Class,object models using fundamental relationships Contents 2.1 Object and Class Concepts (12M) Objects,

BLU AGE 2009 Edition Agile Model Transformation

Semantics in the Financial Industry: the Financial Industry Business Ontology

NOTES ON OBJECT-ORIENTED MODELING AND DESIGN

ALGORITHMIC TRADING AND ORDER ROUTING SERVICES POLICY

CEN/ISSS WS/eCAT. Terminology for ecatalogues and Product Description and Classification

FINANCIAL REGULATORY REPORTING ACROSS AN EVOLVING SCHEMA

Solvency II Taxonomy technical description. Sample version dated

GEP Certificate Database System - User Manual Contents

Intelligence. Peachtree Business Intelligence Report Writing Best Practices

PRINCIPLES AND FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS

REPORTING RECLASSIFICATION RETURNS TO

Answer: D. Answer: B. Answer: B

Export Desktop Motion Analyzer profiles to Motion Analyzer Online: SolidWorks Motion Study Move Profile

Database Management System. Fundamental Database Concepts

MDA & Semantic Web Services Integrating SWSF & OWL with ODM

Credit data collection. Description of electronic reporting

Clean energy for NDCs: scaling up private financing

CONTENTS. TESTING INSTRUCTIONS Appendix 1 to the Stakeholder testing plan. Project to establish the National Incomes Register 1(13)

Data driven transformation of the public sector Tallinn, Estonia Head of unit 22 September 2016 European Commission

European Single Electronic Format (ESEF) Eurofiling workshop 8 June 2017

Reporting instructions for the «AnaCredit» report

Enterprise Architect. User Guide Series. Maintenance

TARGET2-SECURITIES INFORMATION SECURITY REQUIREMENTS

The Data Organization

3. What is the name of the organisation that runs your business registry?

FIBO Shared Semantics. Ontology-based Financial Standards Thursday Nov 7 th 2013

Transcription:

The DPM metamodel detail The EBA process for developing the DPM is supported by interacting tools that are used by policy experts to manage the database data dictionary. The DPM database is designed as a metamodel, whose objects represent the data point modelling concepts (e.g. Module, Template, Data point,,, ) and relationships. Thus, the concrete DPM elements are stored as metadata content describing the concrete instances of these objects (e.g. Module: FinRep, Template: F01.00, cell: F01r30c10, : Base, : Assets ) and their relationships. New EBA Technical Standards and Guidelines usually add new content and introduce changes as well. This gives rise to new versions of templates with a different structure, and new versions of data points with a different categorisation. Other technical amendments resulting from the Single Rulebook Q&A process lead to dimensional modelling corrections and enhancements. The database fully supports the DPM change management process, keeping track of the history of templates and data point versions across successive ITS releases. This is a fundamental feature of a data dictionary supporting data warehousing and time series analysis. The complete structure of the DPM database includes a high number of tables and relationships. While it can be difficult to understand the whole structure at first, the initial approach to the DPM can be facilitated by focusing just on the core parts of the meta-model, which include only a relatively small number of concepts: Framework Report Type Template Taxonomy Module Table Table Group Domain Cell Axis Hierarchy Data Point Ordinate Data Point Version Dim Context Validation Rule In the following sections, the core meta-model will be broken down into different subject areas for a more detailed presentation. 1

Report structures The reporting requirements are organised in Frameworks according to different regulatory areas (e.g. COREP for own funds, FINREP for financial reporting). Frameworks are further broken down into Report Types (a.k.a. Conceptual Modules), covering more specific regulatory subjects (e.g. Own Funds, Large Exposures, Liquidity), which define the comprehensive set of data to be submitted in each report file instance. Each report type consists of a set of Templates that are designed by regulation experts to define the concrete reporting requirements (i.e. what should be reported). The Templates are also used as the unit for defining the reporting obligations (i.e. who should report what), and, therefore, are a very central element of the Technical Standards. While in most cases Templates can be modelled without a problem, sometimes, they may have to be split into different Tables due to a more complicated structure. A Table is either directly equivalent to a Template (e.g. Template C 01.00 becoming Table C 01.00), or is a part of it (e.g. Template C 09.01 originating Tables C 09.01.a and C 09.01.b). Across the successive ITS releases, templates might remain unchanged or they may have to undergo alterations due to restructuring or different reporting requirements. The history of different versions of a template, or part of a template, is kept in the DPM as s, with an associated validity period (from date, to date). Framework Report Type Template Taxonomy Module Table Table Group Each Taxonomy represents a version of a Framework for a certain DPM release. Similarly, each Module (a.k.a. entry point in XBRL terminology) represents a version of a Report Type (a.k.a Conceptual Module ) in a DPM release. Therefore, both Taxonomies and Modules have also a validity period, and since a report instance refers to a specific point in time (reference date), it should be produced according to the correct Module, or otherwise it will be invalid. Within each report type, Templates are organised in intermediate groups for different subject areas (e.g. Capital Adequacy, Credit Risk, and Market Risk). Both Report Types and Tables are standalone versioned, and, therefore, the resulting many-to-many relationship was established in the DPM between s and Modules, via Table Groups. 2

Templates layout Templates consist of a grid of Cells organised in rows, columns, and sheets. Their layout is defined in the DPM by means of an Axis and Axis Ordinate. Each Axis represent one of three possible directions ( X for columns, Y for rows, and Z for sheets), and Ordinates represent the individual rows, columns, or sheets. There are Cells at the intersection of rows, columns, and sheets. Therefore, the position of each Cell can be defined by three ordinates on different axes or two ordinates only, for single-sheet templates that do not require a z-axis. Because of the aforementioned complicated and changing layout of templates, the DPM defines Axis and Ordinates for each and Cells are generated in the database by crossing the Ordinates of the axes of s. Cell Axis Ordinate Core vocabulary The core vocabulary contains all the metadata elements used in the data point modelling to give a precise meaning to each individual cell in the framework. These are classified as Domains, s, s, Hierarchies, and s. Domain Hierarchy Domains and s are similar concepts representing categories of data of the same nature (e.g. Type of Risk ), while s are the actual instances of those categories (e.g. Credit Risk ). The difference between Domains and s is that the first is just used to group s of the same semantic nature, while the later takes into account the role played by the members play in the model, which means that multiple s (e.g. Currency of the collateral, Currency of the exposure ) can take their s from the same Domain ( Currency ). Some Domains in the DPM are "open", i.e. they do not have a predefined list of s because it is not possible to enumerate all their possible instances (e.g. Legal entity ). 3

Hierarchies are used to organise s of a Domain and indicate how s relate to each other. They can also define the aggregations from lower to upper levels in the Hierarchy. Hierarchies are sometimes simply used to define subsets of s (subdomains). s are the s of a special that must be applied to all Data Points and also provide additional meaning to the Data Points by being associated to a Data Type, and having a stock / flow property. al modeling The regulation experts model each Template by assigning a set of / pairs to each Ordinate (row, column, or sheet) that fully categorises it. Axis Ordinate Domain The manual dimensional categorisation of Ordinates is the input to an automated process that generates the full categorisation of each individual Cell, starting from the categorisation of the Ordinates of the Cell in the table Axis. Multiple validations apply to check the quality model, and the process might undergo a number of iterations before the model is considered correct from a formal technical perspective. Each table Cell (not considering the grey-shaded ones) corresponds to a single Data Point. There are, however, some Data Points represented in multiple table Cells. In the latter case, the twin Cells refer to the same data, and should, therefore, share the same categorisation in the DPM. Cell Data Point Data Point Version Dim Context A Data Point represents an elementary reporting requirement item. Because the categorisation of a Data Point might change from one DPM version to another (due to improved data modelling), new Data Point Versions are created as a result of a different categorisation. However, in order to preserve the traceability of data across time (and enable time series analysis), all versions of the 4

same data point, which are valid for consecutive periods of time, are linked to the single Data Point to indicate that all relate to the same business concept whose meaning has not changed. Because of its special role, s are separated from the full categorisation of data point versions. Some Data Points might have the same categorisation except of the (equivalent to the XBRL primary item ). In the latter case, they share the same al Context (equivalent to the XBRL scenario ). Validation rules Data Validation Rules are also represented in the Data Point Model database in a semi-structured format able to support automatic processing. Some Validation Rules are explicitly (manually) defined by business experts, while others are first derived (automatically) from implicit rules in members Hierarchies. Business experts should then whether these rules are applicable or not. Open tables representation The model contains two major types of Tables: The closed tables where each Axis of the tables has all its required values explicitly listed, and therefore the precise size of the reported table is known, and The open tables - where one or more Axes are open (allowing a variable number of entries, chosen either from a restricted list (e.g. Counterparty sectors ), or of a particular type (e.g. Integer ). Closed Tables fall into two main types: those with X-axes and Y-axes only (which are simply plain Tables), and those that also specify a Z-axis. Such tables are also made up of multiple sheets, each with a complete copy of the Table, one for each Ordinate on the Z-axis. Open Tables also fall into two types: list tables and tables with optional sheets. Tables with optional sheets are simply normal Tables with an open z-axis, for which a copy of the table should be completed for each applicable value. The open Z-axis for these Tables typically allows values chosen from an explicit Domain (e.g. a sheet per currency or per country where significant exposures are present etc.). List tables are slightly more complex as they represent a Table where a series of rows with identical columns must be entered, one for each reported item of a particular kind (e.g. a row per entity in a banking group, a row per security held, a row per transaction etc.). These Tables have an open Y- axis. For both open Y-axis and open Y-axis tables, the unknown number of entries on the Axis is represented in the DPM database by an Axis Ordinate with an ordinate code of 999. 5

For open Y-axis tables, the anticipated rendering involves a special column, into which the identifier of each particular row is entered. In many cases, this identifier will simply be a meaningless number (e.g. a line number). In the database, this is represented by the row Axis Ordinate ( 999 ) associated with an open dimension, which describes the nature of this identifier (such as the code of the security or obligor grade), and by a member with ID 999 (to indicate that the entire row is associated with aunknown value from the dimension). 6