Developing a Research Data Policy

Similar documents
Data Management Checklist

Data Management Plan Generic Template Zach S. Henderson Library

Scientific Research Data Management Policy

DIGITAL STEWARDSHIP SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION FORM

Swedish National Data Service, SND Checklist Data Management Plan Checklist for Data Management Plan

DRS Policy Guide. Management of DRS operations is the responsibility of staff in Library Technology Services (LTS).

Checklist and guidance for a Data Management Plan, v1.0

RPg procedures for Research Data Management (RDM)

NSF Data Management Plan Template Duke University Libraries Data and GIS Services

Science Europe Consultation on Research Data Management

UC Irvine LAUC-I and Library Staff Research

Research Data Management Procedures and Guidance

Legal Issues in Data Management: A Practical Approach

DATA SELECTION AND APPRAISAL CHECKLIST University of Reading Research Data Archive

Guidelines for Depositors

Intégrité scientifique: Data Research Management

Basic Requirements for Research Infrastructures in Europe

Collection Policy. Policy Number: PP1 April 2015

DataFlow and VIDaaS Workshop

Data Curation Handbook Steps

About Knowledge Convergence. e-infrastructures Austria an interdisciplinary case study concerning research resources and their management

Agenda. Bibliography

Forthcoming Deposit Agreement of FSD ARJA KUULA CES2012: DATA ACQUISITION AND LICENSE AGREEMENTS 5TH OCTOBER 2012, TAMPERE, FINLAND

Data Management Plans. Sarah Jones Digital Curation Centre, Glasgow

Open Data is a new paradigm in which research data are freely and openly shared, with full re-use rights. Open data ensures that research integrity

DATA PRESERVATION AND SHARING INITIATIVE. 1. Aims of the EORTC QLG Data Repository project

Data management Backgrounds and steps to implementation; A pragmatic approach.

Research Data Preserve, Share, Reuse, Publish, or Perish Mark Gahegan Director, Centre for eresearch 24 Symonds St

Document Title Ingest Guide for University Electronic Records

How to make your data open

Perspectives on Open Data in Science Open Data in Science: Challenges & Opportunities for Europe

Building a Digital Repository on a Shoestring Budget

4.2 Electronic Mail Policy

DRI: Preservation Planning Case Study Getting Started in Digital Preservation Digital Preservation Coalition November 2013 Dublin, Ireland

Survey of Research Data Management Practices at the University of Pretoria

Focus: Themes within Introduction and Context

Make your own data management plan

Scientific Data Policy of European X-Ray Free-Electron Laser Facility GmbH

SECURITY & PRIVACY DOCUMENTATION

Conducting a Self-Assessment of a Long-Term Archive for Interdisciplinary Scientific Data as a Trustworthy Digital Repository

How to share research data

The Data Management Plan: Putting policy into practice Suzanne Clarke Director, Information Resources

Session Two: OAIS Model & Digital Curation Lifecycle Model

28 September PI: John Chip Breier, Ph.D. Applied Ocean Physics & Engineering Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution

Horizon2020/EURO Coordination and Support Actions. SOcietal Needs analysis and Emerging Technologies in the public Sector

Research Data Edinburgh: MANTRA & Edinburgh DataShare. Stuart Macdonald EDINA & Data Library University of Edinburgh

Open Data Policy City of Irving

DRI: Dr Aileen O Carroll Policy Manager Digital Repository of Ireland Royal Irish Academy

Linda Strick Fraunhofer FOKUS. EOSC Summit - Rules of Participation Workshop, Brussels 11th June 2018

Research Data Management Procedures

Swissmeda Data Policy and Privacy Statement (Referred to as Swissmeda Data Policy )

Open Access & Open Data in H2020

Data Management Plan: OR Mooring - Ocean Acidification related measurements (Taken from NOAA Data Sharing Template and adapted for IOOS Certification)

National Data Sharing and Accessibility Policy-2012 (NDSAP-2012)

OPEN SCIENCE & SUPPORT ON AO PUBLISHING AND DATA MANAGEMENT

Survey of research data management practices at the University of Pretoria, South Africa: October 2009 March 2010

Research Data Management

Welcome to the Pure International Conference. Jill Lindmeier HR, Brand and Event Manager Oct 31, 2018

Data Management Planning

Importance of cultural heritage:

FRAMEWORK MAPPING HITRUST CSF V9 TO ISO 27001/27002:2013. Visit us online at Flank.org to learn more.

NEES Community and Communication (NEEScomm) Data Sharing and Archiving Policies and Guidelines, Version 1. December

The Materials Data Facility

GEOSS Data Management Principles: Importance and Implementation

Emory Libraries Digital Collections Steering Committee Policy Suite

Opus: University of Bath Online Publication Store

EU GDPR & ISO Integrated Documentation Toolkit integrated-documentation-toolkit

DIRECTIVE ON RECORDS AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT (RIM) January 12, 2018

Subcontracted Delivery Policy

Protecting Future Access Now Models for Preserving Locally Created Content

CISER Data Archive Collection Policy

Research Data Management: Edinburgh University Library s Approach Dominic Tate

How can CLARIN archive and curate my resources?

Introduction to ALM, UFT, VuGen, and LoadRunner

Data Management Plan

Digital Preservation Policy. Principles of digital preservation at the Data Archive for the Social Sciences

Writing a Data Management Plan A guide for the perplexed

Introduction to SURE

Best Practice Guidelines for the Development and Evaluation of Digital Humanities Projects

Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Peanut (Peanut Innovation Lab) Data Management Plan Version:

Data Curation Profile Human Genomics

Consolidated Privacy Notice

Data Management Plan: Port Radar, Oregon State University (Taken from NOAA Data Sharing Template and adapted for IOOS Certification)

ICS-ACI Policy Series

The Data Curation Profiles Toolkit: Interview Worksheet

SHARING YOUR RESEARCH DATA VIA

Data Management Dr Evelyn Flanagan

Common approaches to management. Presented at the annual conference of the Archives Association of British Columbia, Victoria, B.C.

Big Data infrastructure and tools in libraries

Checklist for a Data Management Plan (v3.0, 17 March 2011)

TARGET2-SECURITIES INFORMATION SECURITY REQUIREMENTS

Implementation of the Data Seal of Approval

DataSTORRE Deposit Guide

RDM through a UK lens - New Roles for Librarians?

Research Data Management: lessons learned - and still to learn

Sparta Systems TrackWise Digital Solution

"Charting the Course... Certified Information Systems Auditor (CISA) Course Summary

Trusted Digital Repositories. A systems approach to determining trustworthiness using DRAMBORA

Privacy Policy on the Responsibilities of Third Party Service Providers

DATA MANAGEMENT PLANS Requirements and Recommendations for H2020 Projects. Matthias Razum April 20, 2018

Transcription:

Developing a Research Data Policy Core Elements of the Content of a Research Data Management Policy This document may be useful for defining research data, explaining what RDM is, illustrating workflows, describing benefits and informing about funder requirements. Additionally, legal and ethical issues are considered, as well as the relationship with publishers. Elements Content Issues that may be addressed Definitions of Research Data Roles Define the scope of the policy and the definition of data according to the definition of the institution Institutional elements / aspects Role of: The institution / The University IT services Scientific Library Research Support Service Legal services The researcher / the PI Data scientist Students in PhD degree Funding body Consider the elements of this list: Raw data Primary data Inconclusive results Negative results Positive results Processed data Released data Shared data Published data Open access published data The policy could define roles, in order to foster / promote the scientific process. Concerning the University, consider these issues: The University will provide training, support, advice, and when appropriate, guidelines and templates for the research data management and research data management plans. The University will provide procedures, mechanisms and services for storage, backup, registration, deposit and retention of research data assets to support current and future access, during Page 1 of 9

and after completion of research projects. Consider also these issues: Any data stored externally, for example in an international data service or domain repository should be registered with the University. Research data management plans must ensure that research data are available for access and re-use where appropriate and under appropriate policies and conditions. Should the University / the funding body maintain ownership of all data produced by its own researchers within its own frame? Concerning the IT-Services, consider these issues: Maintenance of the system(s) Access to the system(s) Preserving integrity of data Authenticity of data Ensure access according to the needs of data provider & rights management system Provide appropriate tools Concerning the Repository management, consider these issues: Preservation of data Management of data Access to data Extraction of data Reuse of data Visualization of data Concerning the Libraries, consider these issues: How can Libraries offer a stable environment in order to support research data management? How can they contribute in expanding digital collections and developing digital infrastructures for research data? Page 2 of 9

How can libraries have a central role in coordinating the implementation of data management policies and procedures in institutions? Concerning the funding body, consider these issues: Requirements of the Funder Costs related to long term archiving (deposit) of research data Costs related to further reuse of data (setting of interfaces and visualization issues) Concerning the data producer / PI, consider these issues: Ensure quality of content Organization of data Clear file structure Consistent file naming and version control Choice of format Documentation of data & metadata Responsibility for research data management through a sound research data management plan during any research project or program lies primarily with the Principal Investigators (PIs). Research Data Lifecycle Creation of Data Preparation and Preservation planning Ingest and Deposit Management Assignment of PI Integrity Storage Backup Registration Retention Future access Sharing Extraction Publication Further reuse Page 3 of 9

Appropriate storage systems for long term preservation Legal compliance Legal and Ethical issues Who is providing the mechanisms and services for storage, backup, registration, deposit and retention of research data in support of current and future access? Who is responsible for legal compliance and security along all phases of research data lifecycle? This concerns data, metadata, related applications as well as technical systems. Checklist of relevant issues: Data loss Recovery strategies Training The legitimate interests of the subjects of research data must be protected. Exclusive rights to reuse or publish research data should not be handed over to commercial publishers or agents without retaining the rights to make the data openly available for re-use, unless this is a condition of funding. Checklist of relevant issues: Copyright issues Distribution rights Exploitation rights (rights to reuse, rights to publish, etc.) Privacy issues Employee protection Consider also these issues: Who is in charge of negotiations with publishers? Who is in charge of negotiations with funders? Who is providing licensing mechanisms and models (licenses)? Sensitive data Who is responsible? Consider anonymization issues: Disclosure agreements Privacy issues Focus on: The issue of re-use of data The long-term preservation issue Page 4 of 9

Data Management Plans Who is developing DMPs? Who is reviewing the DMPs? Who is in charge of the institutional DMPs? Who is responsible for DMP training? Introduce guidelines for submission of project proposals. Should all new research proposals (from date of adoption) include research data management plans or protocols that explicitly address data capture, management, integrity, confidentiality, retention, sharing and publication? Metadata complex Who will run the first level support? Consider also: Information concerning the metadata Contextual information Provenance Relations between datasets Annotations Intellectual property rights of metadata Technical issues Terminology issues E-accessibility issues Standards Who is responsible for the standardization of processes? Research data may be managed to the highest standards throughout the research data lifecycle as part of the University s commitment to research excellence. Checklist of relevant issues: Quality assurance Metadata Technical processes Visualization models Who is responsible: for the definition of visualization models? for the extraction of data? for the implementation of the visualization? Academic based teaching Who is in charge of academic based teaching related to online learning platforms concerning research data? Is this an issue at the institutions (concerning research data management and the re-use of research data)? Page 5 of 9

Traditional knowledge Further issues Who is in charge of safeguarding traditional knowledge of the institution? Content provider entities Consider the integration of the organization s culture and traditions. Research data of future historical interest and all research data that represent records of the University, including data that substantiate research findings, will be offered and assessed for storage and retention in an appropriate national or international data service or domain repository, or a University repository. Quality of content of data Who is responsible? Usually the Principal Investigator (the data producer). Quality of metadata of research data Who is responsible? Usually the Principal Investigator (the data producer). Data access Who is responsible? Consider various levels: from restricted access to open access Checklist of relevant issues: Legal and ethical issues Data sharing Who is responsible? Checklist of relevant issues: Legal and ethical aspects Technical aspects Management aspects (e.g. metadata) Data release Who is responsible? Checklist of relevant issues: Legal and ethical aspects Technical aspects Management aspects Selection of Long Term Archiving /Sharing / Release Who is responsible? Who will take care of this data? Focus on the issue of re-use and future visualization of data. Who will hand over this data to whom/where? Who will decide about sharing and releasing? Who will decide about the forms of visualization? Page 6 of 9

Re-use Who is responsible: Consider the hand over to: for the assignment of correct metadata? for clearing licenses of use? for ethical issues? re-using party additional software applications for further use (for example: Digital Humanities, E-learning systems, visualization and representation tools) for technical issues? Data retention Data preservation Who will decide about data retention? Who will take care of the preservation processes? Who is responsible for the technical support? General topics concerning technical and non-technical aspects Format quality and preservation Quality assurance Concerning the management of the format : Who is responsible for it? Who is responsible for the digital objects / data during the different phases of the life cycle of the object from the technical and non-technical points of view? Are there any formats or content models recommended by the policy? See also the phases of a Digital Workflow Model (Image I: Model of Workflow) representing the phases and describing the different roles (production, preparation, pre-ingest, ingest, management inside an archiving system, extraction, export, visualization) Page 7 of 9

Image I: Model of Workflow by Raman Ganguly (http://phaidra.univie.ac.at/o:387249) This graph shows a digital workflow model starting at the left side with the content producer and ending on the right side with the visualization of the content. Data management plans accompany the processes along the entire life cycle. Phases of the Data Preservation Process Pre-Ingest: In this step, the responsibility lies on the Content Creator. In this phase will be determined which data is to be archived, their quality, and under what user license will be granted their re-use. Ingest: In this step, the Repository Manager takes over the responsibility. To be able to archive the data, a data conversion process needs to take place first. The conversion process should not affect the quality of the data. Management: Ensures security and access to the data, in the quality required for their reusability. Re-Use: Delivery to external applications specialized on reusing the data provided. The data can be used in e-learning systems, Presentations, or any other additional research processes. Here the responsibility goes to the Content Provider of the external applications. Image II: Data from Research Processes: from raw data to open access published data, by Raman Ganguly (http://phaidra.univie.ac.at/o:387241) Levels and Layers of Data Raw Data: Primary data derived from the research processes Processed Data: Data derived from analytical processes. These processes could provide results, including negative or inconclusive results. Shared Data: Data that will be shared with others. Published Data: Publicly available data Open Access Published Data: Publications under any Open Access modality. Page 8 of 9

Useful links and further related documents: The following list of useful links and further related documents has been created in order to deepen knowledge about Research Data Management. It comprehends references to Research Data Management policies, Data Management Plans. The University of Edinburgh Research Data Management Policy The list is work in progress Page 9 of 9