University of Texas Center for Space Research. ICESAT/GLAS CSR SCF Release Notes for Orbit and Attitude Determination

Similar documents
University of Texas Center for Space Research ICESAT/GLAS Document: CSR SCF Release Notes for Orbit and Attitude Determination

Geoscience Laser Altimeter System (GLAS) LASER FOOTPRINT LOCATION (GEOLOCATION) AND SURFACE PROFILES

Satellite Attitude Determination

PREPARATIONS FOR THE ON-ORBIT GEOMETRIC CALIBRATION OF THE ORBVIEW 3 AND 4 SATELLITES

On-Orbit Calibration of Photodiodes for Attitude Determination

Autonomous Navigation for Flying Robots

Astromechanics. 12. Satellite Look Angle

GYRO MISALIGNMENT AND SCALE FACTOR ERROR DETERMINATION IN MARS ORBITER MISSION

OHB System AG International Conference on Space Optics ICSO 2016 Prepared by Raffello MIGLIORE Date , Biarritz.

Terrestrial GPS setup Fundamentals of Airborne LiDAR Systems, Collection and Calibration. JAMIE YOUNG Senior Manager LiDAR Solutions

How to Use GOCE Level 2 Products

Satellite and Inertial Navigation and Positioning System

The Applanix Approach to GPS/INS Integration

Use of Image aided Navigation for UAV Navigation and Target Geolocation in Urban and GPS denied Environments

Navigational Aids 1 st Semester/2007/TF 7:30 PM -9:00 PM

Summary of Publicly Released CIPS Data Versions.

An Observatory for Ocean, Climate and Environment. SAC-D/Aquarius. MWR Geometric Correction Algorithms. Felipe Madero

DEVELOPMENT OF CAMERA MODEL AND GEOMETRIC CALIBRATION/VALIDATION OF XSAT IRIS IMAGERY

University of Technology Building & Construction Department / Remote Sensing & GIS lecture

APPLANIX PRODUCTS AND SOLUTIONS FOR MOBILE MAPPING AND POSITIONING CAPTURE EVERYTHING. POSPac MMS HYDRO 08 November 2008

Inertial Navigation Systems

ITRF2004 Strategy. Zuheir Altamimi Claude Boucher

Development of a Ground Based Cooperating Spacecraft Testbed for Research and Education

Error Simulation and Multi-Sensor Data Fusion

Characterization of ICESat/GLAS waveforms over terrestrial ecosystems: Implications for vegetation mapping

GEOG 4110/5100 Advanced Remote Sensing Lecture 4

IRS Large Offset Test

Geometric Rectification of Remote Sensing Images

Lecture 13.1: Airborne Lidar Systems

Strapdown inertial navigation technology

DEVELOPMENT OF ORIENTATION AND DEM/ORTHOIMAGE GENERATION PROGRAM FOR ALOS PRISM

Indoor navigation using smartphones. Chris Hide IESSG, University of Nottingham, UK

Data Processing Status

Performance Evaluation of Optech's ALTM 3100: Study on Geo-Referencing Accuracy

Evaluation of Clouds and the Earth s Radiant Energy System (CERES) scanner pointing accuracy using a coastline detection system

STEREO EVALUATION OF ALOS/PRISM DATA ON ESA-AO TEST SITES FIRST DLR RESULTS

MHS Instrument Pre-Launch Characteristics

Satellite Tracking System using Amateur Telescope and Star Camera for Portable Optical Ground Station

Stereo Imaging and Geolocation

Improvements to the GSC Processing and Impact on Geodetic Products

Satellite Laser Altimetry: On-Orbit Calibration Techniques for Precise Geolocation

Strapdown Inertial Navigation Technology

Introduction to Inertial Navigation (INS tutorial short)

SIMA Raw Data Simulation Software for the Development and Validation of Algorithms. Platforms

Reconfigurable Hardware-in-the-Loop Test Bench for the SHEFEX2 Hybrid Navigation System Experiment

ξ ν ecliptic sun m λ s equator

Strapdown Inertial Navigation Technology, Second Edition D. H. Titterton J. L. Weston

ANALYSIS OF SATELLITE LASER ALTIMETRY RANGE MEASUREMENTS OVER LAND TOPOGRAPHY USING GENERALIZED ATTITUDE PARAMETER EXTRACTION

navigation Isaac Skog

Simulation of GNSS/IMU Measurements. M. J. Smith, T. Moore, C. J. Hill, C. J. Noakes, C. Hide

TLS Parameters, Workflows and Field Methods

Evaluation of a GPS-Based Approach for Rapid and Precise Determination of Geodetic/Astronomical Azimuth

Updates on Operational Processing of ATMS TDR and SDR Products

Preliminary validation of Himawari-8/AHI navigation and calibration

"Fast, High-Fidelity, Multi-Spacecraft Trajectory Simulation for Space Catalogue Applications"

Autonomous on-orbit Calibration Of Star Trackers

OPTIMIZING 3D SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS DATA COLLECTION BY RE-USING THE DATA FOR PROJECT LEVEL ROAD DESIGN

Software for Hydrographic Data Processing

LANDSAT 7 (L7) IMAGE ASSESSMENT SYSTEM (IAS) GEOMETRIC ALGORITHM THEORETICAL BASIS DOCUMENT (ATBD)

TLS Parameters, Workflows and Field Methods

Repeat-pass SAR Interferometry Experiments with Gaofen-3: A Case Study of Ningbo Area

Beate Klinger and Torsten Mayer-Gürr Institute of Geodesy NAWI Graz, Graz University of Technology

TLS Parameters, Workflows and Field Methods

SENTINEL-3 PROPERTIES FOR GPS POD

Measuring Ground Deformation using Optical Imagery

Introduction to GAMIT/GLOBK

Working with M 3 Data. Jeff Nettles M 3 Data Tutorial at AGU December 13, 2010

The Determination of Telescope and Antenna Invariant Point (IVP)

Mapping Project Report Table of Contents

Modern Surveying Techniques. Prof. S. K. Ghosh. Department of Civil Engineering. Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee.

Selection and Integration of Sensors Alex Spitzer 11/23/14

Terrain correction. Backward geocoding. Terrain correction and ortho-rectification. Why geometric terrain correction? Rüdiger Gens

Using Data Fusion of DMARS-R-IMU and GPS Data for Improving Attitude Determination Accuracy

Embedded Navigation Solutions. VN-100 User Manual. Firmware v Document Revision UM001 Introduction 1

Technical Document Compensating. for Tilt, Hard Iron and Soft Iron Effects

National GNSS/BDS CORS Services in China

Monitoring of IR Clear-sky Radiances over Oceans for SST (MICROS) for Himawari-8 AHI

ATTEMPTS TO IMPROVE GOES IMAGE NAVIGATION

Assessing the performance of m footprint waveform lidar data collected in ICESat data corridors in Greenland

Mech 296: Vision for Robotic Applications. Today s Summary

Strapdown Inertial Navigation Technology. Second Edition. Volume 207 PROGRESS IN ASTRONAUTICS AND AERONAUTICS

Navigation for Future Space Exploration Missions Based on Imaging LiDAR Technologies. Alexandre Pollini Amsterdam,

Utilization of AGI STK and S-NPP Operational Data to Generate JPSS-1 Proxy Test Data

Updates An Introduction to the New ASPSuite

Calibration of HY-2A Satellite Scatterometer with Ocean and Considerations of Calibration of CFOSAT Scatterometer

DYNAMIC POSITIONING CONFERENCE September 16-17, Sensors

Development of Formation Flight and Docking Algorithms Using the SPHERES Testbed

Fast Star Tracker Centroid Algorithm for High Performance CubeSat with Air Bearing Validation. Matthew Knutson, David Miller. June 2012 SSL # 5-12

Responsive Flight Software Development & Verification Techniques for Small Satellites

LIDAR an Introduction and Overview

CBERS-2. Attitude Control and its Effects on Image Geometric Correction. Follow up to TCM-06 INPE CBERS TEAM

Line of Sight Stabilization Primer Table of Contents

Motion compensation and the orbit restitution

3.3 Analysis Coordinator

Mission Overview Cal Poly s Design Current and future work

NAVIGATION SYSTEM OF AN OUTDOOR SERVICE ROBOT WITH HYBRID LOCOMOTION SYSTEM

Embedded Navigation Solutions VN-100 User Manual

Inertial Measurement for planetary exploration: Accelerometers and Gyros

TES Algorithm Status. Helen Worden

Background Problem Statement Solution. Subsystem Videos Budget Timeline Remaining Tasks Responsibilities Special Thanks Questions

Transcription:

University of Texas Center for Space Research ICESAT/GLAS CSR SCF Notes for Orbit and Attitude Determination Charles Webb Tim Urban Bob Schutz Version 1.0 August 2006

CSR SCF Notes for Orbit and Attitude Determination Notes for,, and ancillary files reported by Includes descriptions of each ANC file type for each ANC release of each campaign Includes calibration level numbers used to determine the in the release naming convention for the elevation products GLA06 and GLA12-15. (See also YXX Number Convention document.) General Notes : ICRF to ITRF Transformation File The transformation between the International Celestial Reference Frame (ICRF) and the International Terrestrial Reference Frame (ITRF) depends on Earth orientation parameters provided by the International Earth Rotation Service (IERS). It is critical that the same values used in ICESat precision orbit determination (POD) are used in the geolocation algorithm. Thus, typically provides one product with the rapid POD products, generated during the laser operations campaign, and a second one with the final POD products, generated during data reprocessing after the completion of the campaign. : Precision Orbit Determination (POD) Ephemeris File The differences between the ICESat rapid and final POD products are entirely related to the inputs from external sources. The most significant of these are the orbits of the GPS satellites, as determined by the International GPS Service (IGS), which provides its own rapid and final solutions. To generate the ICESat rapid POD products (POD calibration level 1), uses the IGS rapid orbit solutions, along with preliminary IERS Earth orientation parameters (mentioned above), and rapid estimates of solar flux and geomagnetic indices obtained from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Space Environment Center. Unless otherwise noted, final POD products (POD calibration level 2) are generated using the final IGS orbit solutions for the GPS satellites, the final IERS Earth orientation parameters, and final estimates of solar flux and geomagnetic indices provided by the National Geophysical Data Center. : Precision Attitude Determination (PAD) File During the course of the ICESat mission, the determination of the laser-pointing direction for each transmitted pulse has evolved significantly. As a result, however, there have been, and continue to be, multiple releases of these precision attitude determination (PAD) solutions for each campaign (comprising PAD calibration levels 1 to 4). In general, during a laser campaign, computes instrument attitude solutions using an Extended Kalman Filter (EKF) to process gyro and uncorrected instrument star-tracker (IST) data, and then applies fixed laser biases to obtain the laser pointing directions. After a campaign concludes, applies calibration corrections to account for IST and laser motion with respect to the instrument. For different campaigns, these corrections have been based on: (1) direct observations made in the on-board Laser Reference Sensor 2

(LRS); (2) models using limited LRS data; (3) differencing of the EKF and batch-derived attitude solutions; and (4) ocean and around-the-world scan maneuvers. New campaigns will likely be limited to the rapid solutions described above (PAD calibration level 1), and the fully calibrated solutions (PAD calibration level 4), which combine the last two corrections. 3

Laser 1a (s) 18 17 11-13 8-10 20-Feb-2003 (051) 05-Mar-2003 (064) 20-Feb-2003 (051) 20-Feb-2003 (051) 21-Mar-2003 (080) 21-Mar-2003 (080) 21-Mar-2003 (080) 21-Mar-2003 (080) 2 2/2 11/3 3 2 2/2 8/2 2 2 2/2 2/1 1 10* 10*/1 10*/1 1 * 10 was incorrectly used to label products that were actually 1. 2 Generated during final POD solutions 10 (see footnote in table above) 2 (POD calibration level 2) Final POD solutions 10 (see footnote in table above) (POD calibration level 1) 4

11 (PAD calibration level 3) Applied 50-ms correction to gyro time tags and implemented gyro time-tag interpolation algorithm Added Laser Profiling Array (LPA) centroid (X,Y) and pulse orientation with respect to LPA X-axis at 40-Hz Applied 8 laser biases 8 (PAD calibration level 2) Applied modeled LRS corrections to compensate for IST motion with respect to the instrument Updated and applied laser biases to pre-launch alignment 2 (PAD calibration level 1) Tuned EKF parameters Changed LPA orientation to be measured with respect to topocentric North Added DEGRADE_INDEX_START and DEGRADE_INDEX_STOP keywords to file-specific header Applied additional laser biases to pre-launch alignment based on range-residual analysis of ocean scans 10 (see footnote in table above) (PAD calibration level 1) Used pre-launch estimate of laser alignment (no additional biases) 5

Laser 1b (s) 8-10 21-Mar-2003 (080) 29-Mar-2003 (088) 10* 10*/1 10*/1 1 * 10 was incorrectly used to label products that were actually 1. 10 (see footnote in table above) 10 (see footnote in table above) (POD calibration level 1) 10 (see footnote in table above) (PAD calibration level 1) Used pre-launch estimate of laser alignment (no additional biases) 6

Laser 2a (s) 26 21,24 19 18 14,17 12 25-Sep-2003 (268) 25-Sep-2003 (268) 25-Sep-2003 (268) 25-Sep-2003 (268) 25-Sep-2003 (268) 25-Sep-2003 (268) 18-Nov-2003 (322) 18-Nov-2003 (322) 18-Nov-2003 (322) 18-Nov-2003 (322) 18-Nov-2003 (322) 18-Nov-2003 (322) 2 (v2) 4/2 25/4 4 2 (v2) 4/2 15/4 4 2 (v2) 4/2 13/3 3 2 (v2) 4/2 9/3 3 2 (v1) 3/1 6/2 2 2 (v1) 3/1 2/1 1 2 (v2) Generated during final POD solutions Maintained release number, but incremented version to 2 2 (v1) 4 (POD calibration level 2) Final POD solutions Changed gravity field from GRACE31 to GGM01C 3 (POD calibration level 1) Changed gravity field from GRACE31 to GGM01C 7

25 (PAD calibration level 4) Updated Laser Profiling Array (LPA) spot characteristics to reflect 1/e 2, rather than fixed, cutoff in intensity values 15 (PAD calibration level 4) Applied scan-maneuver calibrations Removed pre-launch laser alignment and subsequent biases 13 (PAD calibration level 3) Applied de-distortion map (L2a Version 1) to IST data Applied 6 laser biases 9 (PAD calibration level 3) Applied 50-ms correction to gyro time tags and implemented gyro time-tag interpolation algorithm Added LPA centroid (X,Y) and pulse orientation with respect to LPA X-axis to each 40-Hz record Applied 6 laser biases 6 (PAD calibration level 2) Applied direct LRS corrections to compensate for IST motion with respect to the instrument Corrected star catalog precession error Updated and applied laser biases to pre-launch alignment Removed incorrect adjustment of laser biases to account for velocity aberration 2 (PAD calibration level 1) Tuned EKF parameters Changed LPA orientation to be measured with respect to topocentric North Added DEGRADE_INDEX_START and DEGRADE_INDEX_STOP keywords to file-specific header Applied Laser 1 2 laser biases 8

Laser 2b (s) 26 22 15-17 17-Feb-2004 (048) 17-Feb-2004 (048) 17-Feb-2004 (048) 21-Mar-2004 (081) 21-Mar-2004 (081) 21-Mar-2004 (081) 2 (v2) 6/2 23/4 4 2 (v2) 6/2 20/3 3 2 (v1) 3/1 6/1 1 2 (v2) Generated during final POD solutions Maintained release number, but incremented version to 2 2 (v1) 6 (POD calibration level 2) Final POD solutions Changed zenith delay parameter estimation strategy for short passes 3 (POD calibration level 1) Changed gravity field from GRACE31 to GGM01C 9

23 (PAD calibration level 4) Applied scan-maneuver calibrations Removed pre-launch laser alignment and subsequent biases Updated LPA spot characteristics to reflect 1/e 2, rather than fixed, cutoff in intensity values 20 (PAD calibration level 3) Replaced direct LRS corrections with batch-ekf corrections to compensate for IST motion with respect to the instrument Applied de-distortion map (L2a Version 1) to IST data Updated and applied laser biases to pre-launch alignment 6 (PAD calibration level 1) Applied direct LRS corrections to compensate for IST motion with respect to the instrument Corrected star catalog precession error Applied Laser 2a 6 laser biases Removed incorrect adjustment of laser biases to account for velocity aberration 10

Laser 2c (s) 17 18-May-2004 (139) 21-Jun-2004 (173) 2 (v1) 3/1 7/1 1 2 (v1) 3 (POD calibration level 1) Changed gravity field from GRACE31 to GGM01C 7 (PAD calibration level 1) Applied Laser 2b 6 laser biases 11

Laser 3a (s) 23 22 18 03-Oct-2004 (277) 03-Oct-2004 (277) 03-Oct-2004 (277) 08-Nov-2004 (313) 08-Nov-2004 (313) 08-Nov-2004 (313) 2 (v2) 6/2 19/4 4 2 (v2) 6/2 17/3 3 2 (v1) 5/1 12/1 1 2 (v2) Generated during final POD solutions Maintained release number, but incremented version to 2 2 (v1) 6 (POD calibration level 2) Final POD solutions Changed zenith delay parameter estimation strategy for short passes 5 (POD calibration level 1) Changed zenith delay parameter estimation strategy for short passes 12

19 (PAD calibration level 4) Applied scan-maneuver calibrations Removed pre-launch laser alignment and subsequent biases 17 (PAD calibration level 3) Applied batch-ekf corrections to compensate for IST motion with respect to the instrument Applied de-distortion map (L3a Version 1) to IST data Updated and applied laser biases to pre-launch alignment 12 (PAD calibration level 1) Applied additional laser biases to pre-launch alignment based on range-residual analysis of ocean and around-the-world scans 13

Laser 3b (s) Y28 19 17-Feb-2005 (048) 17-Feb-2005 (048) 24-Mar-2005 (083) 24-Mar-2005 (083) 2 (v2) 8/2 28/4 4 2 (v1) 5/1 16/1 1 2 (v2) Generated during final POD solutions Maintained release number, but incremented version to 2 2 (v1) 8 (POD calibration level 2) Final POD solutions Corrected geomagnetic computation for low solar-flux periods 5 (POD calibration level 1) Changed zenith delay parameter estimation strategy for short passes 14

28 (PAD calibration level 4) Applied batch-ekf corrections to compensate for IST motion with respect to the instrument Applied scan-maneuver calibrations Removed pre-launch laser alignment and subsequent biases Updated LPA spot characteristics to reflect 1/e 2, rather than fixed, cutoff in intensity values 16 (PAD calibration level 1) Applied de-distortion map (L3a Version 1) to IST data Applied additional laser biases to pre-launch alignment based on range-residual analysis of ocean and around-the-world scans 15

Laser 3c (s) 22 20-May-2005 (140) 22-Jun-2005 (173) 2 (v1) 5/1 18/1 1 2 (v1) 5 (POD calibration level 1) Changed zenith delay parameter estimation strategy for short passes 18 (PAD calibration level 1) Applied de-distortion map (L3a Version 1) to IST data Applied additional laser biases to pre-launch alignment based on range-residual analysis of ocean and around-the-world scans 16

Laser 3d (s) 26 25 21-Oct-2005 (294) 21-Oct-2005 (294) 24-Nov-2005 (328) 24-Nov-2005 (328) 2 (v2) 6/2 22/4 4 2 (v1) 5/1 21/1 1 2 (v2) Generated during final POD solutions Maintained release number, but incremented version to 2 2 (v1) 6 (POD calibration level 2) Final POD solutions Changed zenith delay parameter estimation strategy for short passes Used preliminary solar flux and geomagnetic index data 5 (POD calibration level 1) Changed zenith delay parameter estimation strategy for short passes 17

22 (PAD calibration level 4) Applied batch-ekf corrections to compensate for IST motion with respect to the instrument Applied scan-maneuver calibrations Removed pre-launch laser alignment and subsequent biases Updated LPA spot characteristics to reflect 1/e 2, rather than fixed, cutoff in intensity values 21 (PAD calibration level 1) Applied arctangent correction to GLA04 IST data Applied additional laser biases to pre-launch alignment based on range-residual analysis of ocean and around-the-world scans 18

Laser 3e (s) 27, Y28 26 22-Feb-2006 (053) 22-Feb-2006 (053) 28-Mar-2006 (087) 28-Mar-2006 (087) 2 (v2) 8/2 27/4 4 2 (v1) 5/1 24/1 1 2 (v2) Generated during final POD solutions Maintained release number, but incremented version to 2 2 (v1) 8 (POD calibration level 2) Final POD solutions Corrected geomagnetic computation for low solar-flux periods 5 (POD calibration level 1) Changed zenith delay parameter estimation strategy for short passes 19

27 (PAD calibration level 4) Applied batch-ekf corrections to compensate for IST motion with respect to the instrument Applied scan-maneuver calibrations Removed pre-launch laser alignment and subsequent biases Updated LPA spot characteristics to reflect 1/e 2, rather than fixed, cutoff in intensity values 24 (PAD calibration level 1) Applied arctangent correction to GLA04 IST data Applied additional laser biases to pre-launch alignment based on range-residual analysis of ocean and around-the-world scans Updated LPA spot characteristics to reflect 1/e 2, rather than fixed, cutoff in intensity values 20

Laser 3f (s) 26 24-May-2006 (144) 26-Jun-2006 (177) 2 (v1) 7/1 26/1 1 2 (v1) 8 (POD calibration level 1) Corrected geomagnetic computation for low solar-flux periods 26 (PAD calibration level 1) Applied arctangent correction to GLA04 IST data Applied additional laser biases to pre-launch alignment based on range-residual analysis of ocean and around-the-world scans Updated LPA spot characteristics to reflect 1/e 2, rather than fixed, cutoff in intensity values 21