MCE/EEC 647/747: Robot Dynamics and Control. Lecture 3: Forward and Inverse Kinematics

Similar documents
EE Kinematics & Inverse Kinematics

MEAM 520. More Denavit-Hartenberg (DH)

Robotics kinematics and Dynamics

MEAM 520. Denavit-Hartenberg (DH)

Forward kinematics and Denavit Hartenburg convention

3. Manipulator Kinematics. Division of Electronic Engineering Prof. Jaebyung Park

Jane Li. Assistant Professor Mechanical Engineering Department, Robotic Engineering Program Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Lecture 3.5: Sumary of Inverse Kinematics Solutions

Prof. Mark Yim University of Pennsylvania

EEE 187: Robotics Summary 2

Kinematics. Kinematics analyzes the geometry of a manipulator, robot or machine motion. The essential concept is a position.

Introduction to Robotics

ME5286 Robotics Spring 2013 Quiz 1

Inverse Kinematics of 6 DOF Serial Manipulator. Robotics. Inverse Kinematics of 6 DOF Serial Manipulator

Industrial Robots : Manipulators, Kinematics, Dynamics

MCE/EEC 647/747: Robot Dynamics and Control. Lecture 1: Introduction

Prof. Mark Yim University of Pennsylvania

This week. CENG 732 Computer Animation. Warping an Object. Warping an Object. 2D Grid Deformation. Warping an Object.

Inverse Kinematics Analysis for Manipulator Robot With Wrist Offset Based On the Closed-Form Algorithm

CALCULATING TRANSFORMATIONS OF KINEMATIC CHAINS USING HOMOGENEOUS COORDINATES

Matlab Simulator of a 6 DOF Stanford Manipulator and its Validation Using Analytical Method and Roboanalyzer

Robotics Prof. Dilip Kumar Pratihar Department of Mechanical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur

Development of Direct Kinematics and Workspace Representation for Smokie Robot Manipulator & the Barret WAM

Theory of Robotics and Mechatronics

ME5286 Robotics Spring 2015 Quiz 1

[2] J. "Kinematics," in The International Encyclopedia of Robotics, R. Dorf and S. Nof, Editors, John C. Wiley and Sons, New York, 1988.

Robot mechanics and kinematics

KINEMATIC ANALYSIS OF 3 D.O.F OF SERIAL ROBOT FOR INDUSTRIAL APPLICATIONS

SCREW-BASED RELATIVE JACOBIAN FOR MANIPULATORS COOPERATING IN A TASK

MTRX4700 Experimental Robotics

Robotics. SAAST Robotics Robot Arms

Kinematics, Kinematics Chains CS 685

The Denavit Hartenberg Convention

A Review Paper on Analysis and Simulation of Kinematics of 3R Robot with the Help of RoboAnalyzer

Homogeneous coordinates, lines, screws and twists

θ x Week Date Lecture (M: 2:05p-3:50, 50-N202) 1 23-Jul Introduction + Representing Position & Orientation & State 2 30-Jul

Robot mechanics and kinematics

Lecture Note 6: Forward Kinematics

Articulated Robots! Robert Stengel! Robotics and Intelligent Systems! MAE 345, Princeton University, 2017

ME5286 Robotics Spring 2014 Quiz 1 Solution. Total Points: 30

6. Kinematics of Serial Chain Manipulators

UNIVERSITY OF OSLO. Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences

Robot Inverse Kinematics Asanga Ratnaweera Department of Mechanical Engieering

Kinematic Model of Robot Manipulators

Jane Li. Assistant Professor Mechanical Engineering Department, Robotic Engineering Program Worcester Polytechnic Institute

IntroductionToRobotics-Lecture02

Planar Robot Kinematics

1. Introduction 1 2. Mathematical Representation of Robots

ME/CS 133(a): Final Exam (Fall Quarter 2017/2018)

INSTITUTE OF AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING

Robotics I. March 27, 2018

Index Terms Denavit-Hartenberg Parameters, Kinematics, Pick and place robotic arm, Taper roller bearings. III. METHODOLOGY

Inverse Kinematics. Given a desired position (p) & orientation (R) of the end-effector

Chapter 2 Kinematics of Mechanisms

Geometric Transformations

ROBOTICS 01PEEQW. Basilio Bona DAUIN Politecnico di Torino

Kinematics - Introduction. Robotics. Kinematics - Introduction. Vladimír Smutný

Basilio Bona ROBOTICA 03CFIOR 1

Fundamentals of Robotics Study of a Robot - Chapter 2 and 3

MDP646: ROBOTICS ENGINEERING. Mechanical Design & Production Department Faculty of Engineering Cairo University Egypt. Prof. Said M.

Simulation and Modeling of 6-DOF Robot Manipulator Using Matlab Software

10/25/2018. Robotics and automation. Dr. Ibrahim Al-Naimi. Chapter two. Introduction To Robot Manipulators

Kinematics Fundamentals CREATING OF KINEMATIC CHAINS

Design & Kinematic Analysis of an Articulated Robotic Manipulator

ÉCOLE POLYTECHNIQUE DE MONTRÉAL

DOUBLE CIRCULAR-TRIANGULAR SIX-DEGREES-OF- FREEDOM PARALLEL ROBOT

Modelling of mechanical system CREATING OF KINEMATIC CHAINS

Chapter 2 Mechanisms Abstract

Reaching and Grasping

Math background. 2D Geometric Transformations. Implicit representations. Explicit representations. Read: CS 4620 Lecture 6

Coordinate Frames and Transforms

Solution of inverse kinematic problem for serial robot using dual quaterninons and plucker coordinates

Serial Manipulator Statics. Robotics. Serial Manipulator Statics. Vladimír Smutný

MEM380 Applied Autonomous Robots Winter Robot Kinematics

Kinematic Model of Anthropomorphic Robotics Finger Mechanisms

ON THE RE-CONFIGURABILITY DESIGN OF PARALLEL MACHINE TOOLS

Forward Kinematic Analysis, Simulation & Workspace Tracing of Anthropomorphic Robot Manipulator By Using MSC. ADAMS

DIMENSIONAL SYNTHESIS OF SPATIAL RR ROBOTS

A Tool for Kinematic Error Analysis of Robots/Active Vision Systems

3D Transformations. CS 4620 Lecture 10. Cornell CS4620 Fall 2014 Lecture Steve Marschner (with previous instructors James/Bala)

Kinematic Synthesis. October 6, 2015 Mark Plecnik

Differential Kinematics. Robotics. Differential Kinematics. Vladimír Smutný

-SOLUTION- ME / ECE 739: Advanced Robotics Homework #2

Using Algebraic Geometry to Study the Motions of a Robotic Arm

Kinematic Analysis of MTAB Robots and its integration with RoboAnalyzer Software

METR 4202: Advanced Control & Robotics

Advanced Robotics. Lecture 1

Lecture Note 2: Configuration Space

A Full Analytical Solution to the Direct and Inverse Kinematics of the Pentaxis Robot Manipulator

Transformation. Jane Li Assistant Professor Mechanical Engineering & Robotics Engineering

Inverse Kinematics Solution for Trajectory Tracking using Artificial Neural Networks for SCORBOT ER-4u

Automatic Extraction of DH Parameters of Serial Manipulators using Line Geometry

Lecture «Robot Dynamics»: Kinematic Control

Synthesis of Spatial RPRP Loops for a Given Screw System

Lecture «Robot Dynamics»: Kinematics 3

ME 115(a): Final Exam (Winter Quarter 2009/2010)

A New Algorithm for Measuring and Optimizing the Manipulability Index

Simulation-Based Design of Robotic Systems

Lecture 3. Planar Kinematics

PPGEE Robot Dynamics I

Transcription:

MCE/EEC 647/747: Robot Dynamics and Control Lecture 3: Forward and Inverse Kinematics Denavit-Hartenberg Convention Reading: SHV Chapter 3 Mechanical Engineering Hanz Richter, PhD MCE503 p.1/12 Aims of Lecture 3 Our goals in this chapter are: To be able to find the link-wise and overall homogeneous transformation matrices for a variety of manipulators with 1 dof joints. To understand and apply the simplifications introduced by the Denavit-Hartenberg convention. To gain understanding of the solution strategies available for the inverse kinematics problem and their use in the open-loop control (non-servo) of manipulators. This chapter is a brief and quick overview, enough understand the following topics, which are more relevant to this course. MCE503 p.2/12

Some Important Assumptions A manipulator is made up of links and joints (kinematic chain). The links are rigid and the joints are 1 dof, regardless of type (revolute or prismatic). We can always accomodate multi-dof (universal-type) joints by thinking that a link of length 0 sits between degrees of freedom (d = 0 in H). There are n + 1 links, numbered from 0 to n, 0 being the base (assumed fixed in this course), and n being the end effector. There are n joints, numbered from 1 to n. Joint i connects link i 1 to link i. When joint i is actuated, link i moves. Consistently with the numbering, nothing moves link 0. To each joint there corresponds a single joint variable, q i, which is either the angle of rotation (revolute joint) or the displacement (prismatic joint). MCE503 p.3/12 The Transformation Matrix The transformation matrix between frames (think joints) i and j is denoted T i j (to go from j to i according to pi = T i j pj ). When i < j, this matrix corresponds to a composition of individual transformations: Tj i = A i+1 A i+2...a j 1 A j Are the A s taken w.r.t. current or fixed frames? Each A i is a variable matrix, due to link motion. However, each is a function of a single parameter, that is, A i = A i (q i ). We are particularly interested in Tn, 0 called simply H in SHV. H = Tn 0 = A 1 (q 1 )A 2 (q 2 )...A n (q n ) Note that the superscript is dropped, since we know that the A i connects consecutive frames. MCE503 p.4/12

The Transformation Matrix... Each A i is a homogeneous matrix: A i = Ri 1 i o i 1 i 0 1 The vector o i 1 i is, of course, the one starting at o i 1 and ending in o i, with components expressed in frame i 1 coordinates. Note Eq. (3.7) in SHV. It says that instead of multiplying the A s, we can multiply the rotational parts and also use Eq.(3.9) to find a total o i j. MCE503 p.5/12 The Denavit-Hartenberg Convention A single A i homogeneous matrix contains, in general, 6 independent parameters (3 rotational dof and 3 translational dof). The D-H convention establishes 2 additional constraints on the relative orientation of consecutive frames (suppose frame 0 and frame 1): 1. The axis x 1 is perpendicular to the axis z 0 (DH1) 2. The axis x 1 intersects the axis z 0 (DH2) MCE503 p.6/12

The D-H Convention... With DH1 and DH2, the number of free parameters is reduced to 4. Any individual homogeneous transformation A i can now be resolved as the product of 4 actions: A i = Rot z,θi Trans z,di Trans x,ai Rot x,αi See Eq. (3.10) for the entries of each matrix and the resulting multiplication. The 4 parameters receive certain names: a i is the link length α i is the link twist d i is the link offset, and θ i is the joint angle Note that only one is variable (q i ). The rest are constant and depend on arm geometry. MCE503 p.7/12 Assigning Coordinate Frames Sign convention: See Fig.3.3. A positive angle must result in a positive advance along the rotation axis when using the right-hand rule. Attach the axes z 0, z 1...z n 1 to each joint, directed along the axis of actuation. Note that z i is the axis of actuation of joint i + 1 (reflect on numbering system). Establish the remaining axes of the base frame (x 0 and y 0 ) arbitrarily, but respecting right-hand rule. We define frame i using frame i 1. Three cases appear. MCE503 p.8/12

Summary of Coord. Frame Assignment Please read Sect. 3.2.2. on your own. If z i 1 and z i cross without intersecting and are not parallel (not coplanar), find the shortest line which intersects both (this line is unique). Let this line become x i, with o i being the intersection of x i with z i. Choose any positive sense for x i and complete with y i to form a right-handed frame. If z i 1 and z i are parallel, choose o i anywhere on z i. Choose x i to be the line joining o i 1 to o i (any positive sense). Then complete as before. If o i is chosen to be the intersection of the normal to z i 1 through o i 1 we get d i = 0. Note that α i = 0 always in this case. If z i 1 and z i intersect, choose x i to be the common normal passing through the point of intersection (any positive sense). Usually, o i is taken to be the point of intersection. Note that a i = 0 always in this case. MCE503 p.9/12 End Frame Assignment The coordinate system for the end frame is more conveniently assigned according to end effector features The origin o n is placed in the middle of the tool/gripper a is the approach direction s is the sliding direction n is the normal direction MCE503 p.10/12

Examples 3.1 In class 3.4 In class Follow all other examples on your own. Think about alternative solutions. Homework 2: 3-10 MCE503 p.11/12 Notes Forward kinematics: Suppose time histories are given for all joint variables (q i (t) given). Also, a point p n is given (for instance the middle of the gripper: p n = o n = 0). Find the trajectory of p n in world coordinates (find p 0 (t)). Once Tn 0 is determined, all we have to do is substitute the values of q i (t) and evaluate for all desired time instants. Inverse kinematics: The reverse problem (p 0 (t) given). We will not cover the details of the solution method. Discussion: Exact model inversions are of little value when considering feedback controls. The values of the joint variables (control inputs) are not explicit functions of time, but rather function of certain sensed variables. These inputs are determined by the control algorithm, on the basis of the dynamic model (future lectures). MCE503 p.12/12