GRAPHS WITH 1-FACTORS

Similar documents
A THREE AND FIVE COLOR THEOREM

Fundamental Properties of Graphs

Simultaneous Diagonal Flips in Plane Triangulations

The Restrained Edge Geodetic Number of a Graph

Two Characterizations of Hypercubes

Number Theory and Graph Theory

K 4 C 5. Figure 4.5: Some well known family of graphs

Matching Theory. Figure 1: Is this graph bipartite?

CLAW-FREE 3-CONNECTED P 11 -FREE GRAPHS ARE HAMILTONIAN

Discrete Applied Mathematics. A revision and extension of results on 4-regular, 4-connected, claw-free graphs

University of Twente. Faculty of Mathematical Sciences. Construction of cycle double covers for certain classes of graphs

Section 3.1: Nonseparable Graphs Cut vertex of a connected graph G: A vertex x G such that G x is not connected. Theorem 3.1, p. 57: Every connected

Hamiltonian cycles in bipartite quadrangulations on the torus

A study on the Primitive Holes of Certain Graphs

COLORING EDGES AND VERTICES OF GRAPHS WITHOUT SHORT OR LONG CYCLES

VIZING S THEOREM AND EDGE-CHROMATIC GRAPH THEORY. Contents

Chapter 4. square sum graphs. 4.1 Introduction

Zero-Sum Flow Numbers of Triangular Grids

On the Relationships between Zero Forcing Numbers and Certain Graph Coverings

THE RESTRAINED EDGE MONOPHONIC NUMBER OF A GRAPH

Non-zero disjoint cycles in highly connected group labelled graphs

THE THICKNESS OF THE COMPLETE MULTIPARTITE GRAPHS AND THE JOIN OF GRAPHS

Perfect Matchings in Claw-free Cubic Graphs

Binding Number of Some Special Classes of Trees

Discrete Mathematics. Elixir Dis. Math. 92 (2016)

2 1 GRAPHS WITH FORBIDDEN SUBGRAPHS

PACKING DIGRAPHS WITH DIRECTED CLOSED TRAILS

The Edge Fixing Edge-To-Vertex Monophonic Number Of A Graph

Bipartite Roots of Graphs

We need the following Theorems for our further results: MAIN RESULTS

Coloring edges and vertices of graphs without short or long cycles

Enumerating Perfect Matchings in a Ring of Diamonds

On the Geodetic Number of Line Graph

Math 776 Graph Theory Lecture Note 1 Basic concepts

Edge-disjoint Spanning Trees in Triangulated Graphs on Surfaces and application to node labeling 1

Advanced Combinatorial Optimization September 17, Lecture 3. Sketch some results regarding ear-decompositions and factor-critical graphs.

The Lower and Upper Forcing Edge-to-vertex Geodetic Numbers of a Graph

Matching Algorithms. Proof. If a bipartite graph has a perfect matching, then it is easy to see that the right hand side is a necessary condition.

Rigidity, connectivity and graph decompositions

Non-extendible finite polycycles

Forced orientation of graphs

G.B. FAULKNER and D.H. YOUNGER

AN ALGORITHM FOR A MINIMUM COVER OF A GRAPH

Graph Connectivity G G G

GEODETIC DOMINATION IN GRAPHS

Winning Positions in Simplicial Nim

V10 Metabolic networks - Graph connectivity

Characterizations of graph classes by forbidden configurations

CONNECTIVITY AND NETWORKS

Applied Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 5, 2011, no. 49, Július Czap

Abstract. 1. Introduction

ANNALES DE L I. H. P., SECTION B

Bounds for the m-eternal Domination Number of a Graph

and Heinz-Jürgen Voss

Double Vertex Graphs and Complete Double Vertex Graphs. Jobby Jacob, Wayne Goddard and Renu Laskar Clemson University April, 2007

Math 170- Graph Theory Notes

Graphs That Are Randomly Traceable from a Vertex

Independence and Cycles in Super Line Graphs

Math 777 Graph Theory, Spring, 2006 Lecture Note 1 Planar graphs Week 1 Weak 2

V~.31, Cutpoints in the conjunction of two graphs

[8] that this cannot happen on the projective plane (cf. also [2]) and the results of Robertson, Seymour, and Thomas [5] on linkless embeddings of gra

On total domination and support vertices of a tree

Induced-universal graphs for graphs with bounded maximum degree

A note on the saturation number of the family of k-connected graphs

Subdivisions of Graphs: A Generalization of Paths and Cycles

Problem Set 2 Solutions

DO NOT RE-DISTRIBUTE THIS SOLUTION FILE

The strong chromatic number of a graph

EDGE MAXIMAL GRAPHS CONTAINING NO SPECIFIC WHEELS. Jordan Journal of Mathematics and Statistics (JJMS) 8(2), 2015, pp I.

Some Upper Bounds for Signed Star Domination Number of Graphs. S. Akbari, A. Norouzi-Fard, A. Rezaei, R. Rotabi, S. Sabour.

Basics of Graph Theory

Definition For vertices u, v V (G), the distance from u to v, denoted d(u, v), in G is the length of a shortest u, v-path. 1

CHARACTERIZING SYMMETRIC DIAMETRICAL GRAPHS OF ORDER 12 AND DIAMETER 4

[Ramalingam, 4(12): December 2017] ISSN DOI /zenodo Impact Factor

The upper open monophonic number of a graph

Introduction to Graph Theory

Chromatic Transversal Domatic Number of Graphs

A generalization of zero divisor graphs associated to commutative rings

1 Matchings with Tutte s Theorem

Problem Set 3. MATH 776, Fall 2009, Mohr. November 30, 2009

SANDRA SPIROFF AND CAMERON WICKHAM

The following is a summary, hand-waving certain things which actually should be proven.

A Reduction of Conway s Thrackle Conjecture

(Received Judy 13, 1971) (devised Nov. 12, 1971)

Partitioning Complete Multipartite Graphs by Monochromatic Trees

Vertex-Colouring Edge-Weightings

The crossing number of K 1,4,n

Weighted Geodetic Convex Sets in A Graph

Vertex 3-colorability of claw-free graphs

Spanning eulerian subgraphs in N 2 -locally connected claw-free graphs

Complexity Results on Graphs with Few Cliques

arxiv: v1 [math.co] 28 Nov 2016

8 Colouring Planar Graphs

THE WORD AND CONJUGACY PROBLEMS FOR THE KNOT GROUP OF ANY TAME, PRIME, ALTERNATING KNOT

Key Graph Theory Theorems

Math 443/543 Graph Theory Notes 11: Graph minors and Kuratowski s Theorem

Adjacent: Two distinct vertices u, v are adjacent if there is an edge with ends u, v. In this case we let uv denote such an edge.

Department of Mathematical Sciences University of Nevada, Las Vegas Las Vegas, NV

A note on isolate domination

GLOBAL GEOMETRY OF POLYGONS. I: THE THEOREM OF FABRICIUS-BJERRE

Transcription:

proceedings of the american mathematical society Volume 42, Number 1, January 1974 GRAPHS WITH 1-FACTORS DAVID P. SUMNER Abstract. In this paper it is shown that if G is a connected graph of order 2n (n> 1) not containing a 1-factor, then for each k, Kk^n, there exists an induced, connected subgraph of order 2k which also fails to possess a 1-factor. Several other sufficient conditions for a graph to contain a 1-factor are presented. In particular, it is seen that the connected even order line graphs and total graphs always contain a 1-factor. In this paper all graphs will be finite, undirected and without loops or multiple edges. A \-factor of a graph is a spanning subgraph which is regular of degree one. Tutte [5] has characterized graphs which contain 1-factors. Beineke and Plummer [1] proved that every block with a 1- factor always contains at least one more, and a result due to Petersen [4] showed that every cubic graph with no bridges contains a 1-factor. Our purpose in this paper is to show (Theorem 2) that for any connected graph of order 2«which does not contain a 1-factor and for each integer k, Kk^n, there is an induced, connected subgraph of order 2k which also fails to possess a 1-factor. Moreover, several other sufficient conditions for a graph to contain a 1-factor are given. In particular, we see that the connected, even order line graphs and total graphs must always contain a 1-factor. Our terminology will conform to that in Harary [3]. Definition. If x is an endpoint of the graph G and x is adjacent to z, then we will say that z is the joint of x. If x and y are two endpoints of G which have the same joint, then we will call x and y coincident endpoints. We note that no graph with coincident endpoints can possess a 1-factor. Lemma 1. If G is a connected, nontrivial graph with no coincident endpoints, then there exist adjacent points x, yeg such that G {x,y} is connected. Proof. Since the lemma clearly holds for complete graphs, we assume that G has diameter d^.2. Let a, y e G be points of G which are a distance d apart and let D=a xy be a path of length rf joining a and v. Suppose Received by the editors September 5,1.972. AMS (MOS) subject classifications (1970). Primary 05C99. 8 American Mathematical Society 1974

GRAPHS. WITH 1-FACTORS 9 that G*=G {x, y} is not a connected graph. Let A be the component of G* that contains a. We note that since D is a diameter of G, every point in G* A is adjacent to x. Thus ifg* A contains a nontrivial component B, then for any b,c e B which are adjacent, every point in G {è, c} is joined to x by a path, and hence G {b, c) is connected. Similarly, if there exists a point e e G* A which is adjacent to v, then G {e,y} is connected. Hence we may suppose that G* A contains only isolated points and each of these points is adjacent only to x. Thus every point in G* A is an endpoint of G with joint x. Therefore since G has no coincident endpoints, G* A must consist of a single isolated point/. If y were an endpoint of G, then/and y would be coincident endpoints. Hence we may assume that y is adjacent to some element of A, and so G {/, x} is connected. Theorem 1. If G is a connected graph of even order, then G2 has a l-factor. Proof. Noting that the result holds for graphs of low order, we proceed by induction. Suppose that G is connected of even order and that the theorem holds for graphs of smaller order. By Lemma 1 we may find points x, y e G such that d(x,y)^2 and G {x, v} is connected (for we may either choose x and y to be coincident endpoints or, if none such exist, we may. take x and y to be the points guaranteed by Lemma 1). Thus (G {x, v})2 has a 1-factor, which together with the edge xy of G2 yields a 1-factor for G2. D Thus since the total graph T(G) of a graph G satisfies T(G)=[S(G)]2 (Behzad [2]) where S(G) is the subdivision graph of G, we have Corollary 1. Every connected, total graph of even order has a l-factor. Theorem 2. If G is a connected graph of order In (n> 1) and k is an integer, Kk^n, such that every induced, connected subgraph of order 2k has a 1-factor, then G has a l-factor. Proof. We proceed by induction. The theorem is easily checked for n=2, 3. Suppose that it holds for some n 1 (w^4). Let G be a connected graph of order 2/z and suppose k is such that 1 <k^n and every induced, connected subgraph of order 2k contains a 1-factor. Clearly we may assume that k^n l, the case k=n being trivial. If G contained two coincident endpoints, then we could extend the graph consisting of these two points and their common joint to a connected, induced subgraph of order 2k which has no 1-factor. Hence G does not contain two coincident endpoints and thus by Lemma 1, there exist adjacent points x, yeg such that G {x, v} is connected. Thus by our inductive assumption, G {x,y} has a 1-factor which together with the edge xy constitutes a 1-factor for G.

10 D. P. SUMNER [January Corollary 2. If G is a connected graph of even order with no induced K13, Proof. The only connected graph of order four which does not have a 1-factor is K13. Thus (except in the trivial case where G is K2) the corollary is the special case of the theorem with k=2. Since no line graph can contain K13 as an induced subgraph, we obtain Corollary 3. Every connected line graph of even order has a \-factor. A 1-factor of a graph may be viewed as a partition of the points into two-element subsets in such a way that the elements of each set are adjacent. As a result of Corollary 3, we see that it is always possible to form a similar partition of the edges as long as there are an even number of them. Similarly, as a result of Corollary 1, if a graph contains an even number of elements (i.e., points and lines), then we may partition the elements into subsets of order two so that the elements of each subset are either adjacent or incident. As another immediate consequence of Corollary 2 we have Corollary 4. Every connected cubic graph in which every point lies in a triangle has a l-factor. Remark. An alternate proof of Corollary 4 is obtained by noting that in any such graph other than K4 the collection of those edges that lie in an even number of triangles constitutes a 1-factor. As an example, consider the graph in Figure 1. The edges which are numbered determine such a 1-factor. Figure 1 Our next result is an extension of Theorem 2. By an end-block we mean one which contains exactly one cutpoint. Theorem 3. Let G be a connected graph of even order. If (i) G has exactly one block of even order, and (ii) for each block B of G, there exists an integer k, 3<k^\B\ such that every induced, connected subgraph of B having order k contains a 1-factor,

1974] GRAPHS WITH 1-FACTORS 11 Proof. If G has exactly one block, then G has a 1-factor by Theorem 2. Suppose G is a graph satisfying the conditions (i) and (ii) such that the theorem holds for graphs with fewer blocks. Since G has at least two endblocks, there exists an end-block B of odd order. Let b e B be the unique cutpoint of G lying in B, and let k be the integer associated with B. Then B {b) is connected of even order and every induced, connected subgraph of B {b} having order k has a 1-factor (note k^\b\ 1 since \B\ is odd). Thus B {b) has a 1-factor by Theorem 1. Also (G 5)U{ } has fewer blocks than G and satisfies (i) and (ii) and hence has a 1-factor. Thus we obtain a 1-factor for G. The next theorem may be proven in a similar manner. Theorem 4. If G is a connected graph of even order such that (i) G has exactly one block of even order, and (ii) no block of G contains an induced K13, Theorem 5. If G is a connected graph of even order and every induced K13 contains a bridge whose deletion results in two components of even order, Proof. We induct on the number of points in G noting that the result holds for small orders. Let G be a graph satisfying the hypotheses of the theorem and such that the theorem holds for graphs with fewer points than G. If G has no induced K13, then G has a 1-factor by Corollary 2. If G does not contain an induced K13, let e=ab be an edge of this K13 such that the deletion of e results in a graph having the two even components A and B with ae A and b e B. Suppose A contains an induced K13. Let/be an edge of this subgraph such that G {/} contains two components of even order. Since both endpoints of/lie in A, A {f} consists of two components Cand D. We may assume ae D. Then C is one of the components of G {/} and hence has even order (as must D also). Thus A satisfies the conditions of the theorem and so must have a 1-factor. Similarly, B contains a 1-factor which together with that for A produces a 1-factor for G. D Since this paper was submitted, we have learned that our Theorem 1, Corollary 1, and Corollary 3 were discovered independently by G. Chartrand, A. Polimeni, and J. Stewart and occur in their paper The existence of a \-factor in line graphs, squares, and total graphs, which is to appear in Indagationes Mathematicae. Acknowledgment. Thanks are due to Frank R. Bernhart for pointing out to me an error in a previous version of this paper.

12 D. P. SUMNER References 1. L. W. Beineke and M. D. Plummer, On the 1-factors of a nonseparable graph, J. Combinatorial Theory 2 (1967), 285-289. MR 35 #1499. 2. M. Behzad, A criterion for the planarity of the total graph of a graph, Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 63 (1967), 679-681. MR 35 #2771. 3. F. Harary, Graph theory, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1969. MR 41 #1566. 4. J. Petersen, Die Theorie der regulären Graphen, Acta Math. (1891), 193-220. 5. W. T. Tutte, The factorizations of linear graphs, J. London Math. Soc. 22 (1947), 107-111. MR 9, 297. Department of Mathematics, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina 29208